1
|
Larach DB, Waljee JF, Bicket MC, Brummett CM, Bruehl S. Perioperative opioid prescribing and iatrogenic opioid use disorder and overdose: a state-of-the-art narrative review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:602-608. [PMID: 37931982 PMCID: PMC11070448 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE Considerable attention has been paid to identifying and mitigating perioperative opioid-related harms. However, rates of postsurgical opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose, along with associated risk factors, have not been clearly defined. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the evidence connecting perioperative opioid prescribing with postoperative OUD and overdose, compare these data with evidence from the addiction literature, discuss the clinical impact of these conditions, and make recommendations for further study. EVIDENCE REVIEW State-of-the-art narrative review. FINDINGS Nearly all evidence is from large retrospective studies of insurance claims and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data. Incidence rates of new OUD within the first year after surgery ranged from 0.1% to 0.8%, while rates of overdose events ranged from 0.01% to 0.8%. Higher rates were seen among VHA patients, which may reflect differences in data completeness and/or risk factors. Identified risk factors included those related to substance use (preoperative opioid use; non-opioid substance use disorders; preoperative sedative, anxiolytic, antidepressant, and gabapentinoid use; and postoperative new persistent opioid use (NPOU)); demographic attributes (chiefly male sex, younger age, white race, and Medicaid or no insurance coverage); psychiatric comorbidities such as depression, bipolar disorder, and PTSD; and certain medical and surgical factors. Several challenges related to the use of administrative claims data were identified; there is a need for more granular retrospective studies and, ideally, prospective cohorts to assess postoperative OUD and overdose incidence with greater accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Retrospective data suggest an incidence of new postoperative OUD and overdose of up to 0.8% during the first year after surgery, but prospective studies are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Larach
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jennifer F Waljee
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Mark C Bicket
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Chad M Brummett
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Stephen Bruehl
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thao V, Helfinstine DA, Sangaralingham LR, Yonekawa Y, Starr MR. Hospitalization, Overdose, and Mortality After Opioid Prescriptions Tied to Ophthalmic Surgery. Ophthalmology 2024; 131:943-949. [PMID: 38280654 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Opioid prescriptions continue to carry significant short- and long-term systemic risks, even after ophthalmic surgery. The goal of this study was to identify any association of opioid prescription, after ophthalmic surgery, with postoperative hospitalization, opioid overdose, opioid dependence, and all-cause mortality. DESIGN Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing an ophthalmic surgery in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. METHODS We used deidentified administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse to create 3 cohorts of patients for analysis from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2022. The first cohort consisted of 1-to-1 propensity score-matched patients who had undergone ophthalmic surgery and had filled a prescription for an opioid and not filled a prescription for an opioid. The second cohort consisted of patients who were considered opioid naïve and had filled a prescription for an opioid matched to patients who had not filled a prescription for an opioid. The last cohort consisted of opioid-naïve patients matched across the following morphine milligram equivalents (MME) groups: ≤ 40, 41-80, and > 80. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Short- and long-term risks of hospitalization, opioid overdose, opioid dependency/abuse, and death were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS We identified 1 577 692 patients who had undergone an ophthalmic surgery, with 312 580 (20%) filling an opioid prescription. Among all patients, filling an opioid prescription after an ophthalmic surgery was associated with increased mortality (hazard rate [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.31; P < 0.001), hospitalization (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.49-1.53; P < 0.001), opioid overdose (HR, 7.31; 95% CI, 6.20-8.61, P < 0.001), and opioid dependency (HR, 13.05; 95% CI, 11.48-14.84; P < 0.001) compared with no opioid prescription. Furthermore, we found that higher MME doses of opioids were associated with higher rates of mortality, hospitalization, and abuse/dependence. CONCLUSIONS Patients who filled an opioid prescription after an ophthalmic surgery experienced higher rates of mortality, hospitalization, episodes of opioid overdose, and opioid dependence compared with patients who did not fill an opioid prescription. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viengneesee Thao
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - David A Helfinstine
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lindsey R Sangaralingham
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yoshihiro Yonekawa
- The Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew R Starr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Staniorski CJ, Yu M, Sharbaugh D, Stencel MG, Myrga JM, Davies BJ, Yabes JG, Jacobs B. Predictors of persistent opioid use in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: A SEER-Medicare analysis. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:220.e21-220.e29. [PMID: 38565428 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate patient and provider characteristics that predict persistent opioid use following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer including non-opioid naïve patients. METHODS Patients undergoing cystectomy between July 2007 and December 2015 were identified using the SEER-Medicare database. Opioid exposure was identified before and after cystectomy using Medicare Part D data. Multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of the primary outcomes: persistent opioid use (prescription 3-6 months after surgery) and postoperative opioid prescriptions (within 30 days of surgery). Secondary outcomes included physician prescribing practices and rates of persistent opioid use in their patient cohorts. RESULTS A total of 1,774 patients were included; 29% had prior opioid exposure. Compared to opioid-naïve patients, non-opioid naïve patients were more frequently younger, Black, and living in less educated communities. The percentage of persistent postoperative use was 10% overall and 24% in non-opioid naïve patients. Adjusting for patient factors, opioid naïve individuals were less likely to develop persistent use (OR 0.23) while a 50-unit increase in oral morphine equivalent per day prescribed following surgery nearly doubled the likelihood of persistent use (OR 1.98). Practice factors such as hospital size, teaching affiliation, and hospital ownership failed to predict persistent use. 29% of patients filled an opioid prescription postoperatively. Opioid naïve patients (OR 0.13) and those cared for at government hospitals (OR 0.59) were less likely to fill an opioid script along with those residing in the Northeast. Variability between physicians was seen in prescribing practices and rates of persistent use. CONCLUSIONS Non-opioid naïve patients have higher rates of post-operative opioid prescription than opioid-naïve patients. Physician prescribing practices play a role in persistent use, as initial prescription amount predicts persistent use even in non-opioid naïve patients. Significant physician variation in both prescribing practices and rates of persistent use suggest a role for standardizing practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Staniorski
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
| | - Michelle Yu
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Danielle Sharbaugh
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Michael G Stencel
- Department of Urology, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3100 MacCorkle Ave Se Suite 602, Charleston, WV 25304
| | - John M Myrga
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Benjamin J Davies
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Jonathan G Yabes
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 1218 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261
| | - Bruce Jacobs
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Butler I, Taheri P, Khanna P, Gereta S, Hariprasad K, Ancha N, Charles Osterberg E. Decreased Opioid Prescription With Low Pain Scores After Urethroplasty: Using a Simplified, Multimodal, Opioid Minimization Pain Protocol. Urology 2024; 186:24-30. [PMID: 38367712 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To implement a simplified, opioid-minimized, multimodal pain management (MPM) protocol and assess its effectiveness of reducing opioid dispersion while maintaining low postoperative complications, patient-reported pain, and patient-reported interference with quality of life (QOL) for men undergoing urethroplasty. METHODS Ninety-five men at a single academic center from October 2020 to October 2023 received a urethroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the prior standard pain management (SPM) cohort before August 2021, then prospectively studied the MPM cohort after August 2021. For the SPM cohort, we collected postoperative day (POD) 1 pain scores from our Electronic Medical Record (EMR). For the MPM cohort, we obtained a validated pain and QOL assessment in the early postoperative period. The SPM cohort's POD 1 pain scores were compared with the MPM cohort's POD 2 pain scores. Opioid dispensation records were queried from the Prescription Monitoring Program. RESULTS Seventy-five morphine milligram equivalent fewer opioids in the MPM cohort were prescribed than the SPM cohort (0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-0) vs 75 (IQR:0-150), P < .001, respectively). Patients with opioid discharge prescriptions fell from 50% in the SPM cohort to 11% in the MPM cohort (P < .001). Early postoperative pain scores remained low and showed no significant difference between the cohorts. Pain's interference with QOL measures remained low. Complications were rare across both cohorts. CONCLUSION This simplified, multimodal analgesia protocol effectively decreases postoperative pain and opioid dispersion without affecting QOL outcomes after urethroplasty. This pain regimen can be easily adopted to decrease the use of postoperative opioids in men undergoing urethroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imani Butler
- Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
| | - Pegah Taheri
- Dell Medical School, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Division of Urology, Austin, TX
| | - Prachi Khanna
- Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Sofia Gereta
- Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | | | - Nirupama Ancha
- Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Edward Charles Osterberg
- Dell Medical School, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Division of Urology, Austin, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ditonno F, Franco A, Licari LC, Bologna E, Manfredi C, Katz DO, Huang JH, Latchamsetty KC, Coogan CL, Cherullo EE, Chow AK, Vourganti S, Autorino R. Implementation of single-port robotic urologic surgery: experience at a large academic center. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:119. [PMID: 38492003 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01884-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
The Single-Port (SP) robotic system is increasingly being implemented in the United States, allowing for several minimally invasive urologic procedures to be performed. The present study aims to describe our single-center experience since the adoption of the SP platform. We retrospectively collected and analyzed consecutive SP cases performed at a major teaching hospital in the Midwest (Rush University Medical Center) from December 2020 to December 2023. Demographic variables were collected. Surgical and pathological outcomes were analyzed in the overall cohort and for each type of procedure. The study timeframe was divided into two periods to assess the evolution of SP technical features over time. In total, 160 procedures were performed, with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) being the most common (49.4%). Overall, 54.4% of the procedures were extraperitoneal, with a significantly higher adoption of this approach in the second half of the study period (30% vs 74.3%, p < 0.001). A "plus one" assistant port was adopted in 38.1% of cases, with a shift towards a "pure" single-port surgery in the most recent procedures (21.1% vs 76.7%, p < 0.001). The median LOS was 33.5 h (30-48), with a rate of any grade and CD ≥ 3 postoperative complications of 9.4% and 2.5%, respectively, and a 30-day readmission rate of 1.9%. SP robotic surgery can be safely and effectively implemented for various urologic procedures. With increasing experience, the SP platform allows shifting away from transperitoneal procedures, potentially minimizing postoperative pain, and shortening hospital stay and postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Leslie Claire Licari
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Eugenio Bologna
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - David O Katz
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Jonathan H Huang
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Kalyan C Latchamsetty
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Christopher L Coogan
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Edward E Cherullo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Alexander K Chow
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Srinivas Vourganti
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Foppiani J, Alvarez AH, Stearns SA, Taritsa IC, Weidman AA, Valentine L, Escobar-Domingo MJ, Foster L, Schuster KA, Ho OA, Rinker B, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Utilization of patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery clinical trials: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 90:215-223. [PMID: 38387418 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have evolved to validated questionnaires assessing health-related quality of life. This systematic review evaluates the utilization of PROs in United States plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) clinical trials (CTs). METHODS A medical librarian conducted a search strategy for PRS CTs from 2012 to 2022. CTs were identified and assessed for PRO utilization. Summary statistics were performed, and Fisher's exact test was used for subgroup analysis. RESULTS Of the 3609 studies initially identified, 154 were PRS CTs. Approximately half (80 studies) employed PROs, encompassing 13,190 participants, 95% (12,229) of whom were female. Among the CTs, 37 (48%) were in the field of reconstruction, while 25 (32%) were cosmetic. Pain (35%) and patient satisfaction (24%) were the most common primary outcomes. Validated PROs were the main outcome in 61% of these trials, with the visual analog scale (19%) and BREAST-Q (15%) as the top instruments. Funding was primarily private (34%) or not reported (49%). No significant trend in validated PRO usage was observed over the examined decade. CONCLUSIONS The use of PROs is relevant for healthcare delivery and improvement as they provide insight into the efficacy of treatments from a patient-centered viewpoint. PROs are reported in just over half of PRS CTs, and within those CTs, the use of validated questionnaires is inconsistent. Therefore, emerging CTs should strive to incorporate PRO measures and utilize the existing validated tools to assess novel interventions and ensure that the data reported is objective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Foppiani
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Angelica Hernandez Alvarez
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen A Stearns
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Iulianna C Taritsa
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allan A Weidman
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren Valentine
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria J Escobar-Domingo
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lacey Foster
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kirsten A Schuster
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olivia A Ho
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Brian Rinker
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Bernard T Lee
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel J Lin
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cabo JJS, Miller NL. Nonopioid Pain Management Pathways for Stone Disease. J Endourol 2024; 38:108-120. [PMID: 38009214 DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: New opioid dependency after urologic surgery is a serious adverse outcome that is well-described in the literature. Patients with stone disease often require multiple procedures because of recurrence of disease and hence are at greater risk for repeat opioid exposures. Despite this, opioid prescribing after urologic surgery remains highly variable and in an emergency setting, opioids are still used commonly in management of acute renal colic. Methods: Two literature searches were performed using PubMed. First, we searched available literature concerning opioid-sparing pathways in acute renal colic. Second, we searched available literature for opioid-sparing pathways in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Abstracts were reviewed for inclusion in our narrative review. Results: In the setting of acute renal colic, multiple randomized control trials have shown that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) attain greater reduction in pain scores, decreased need for rescue medications, and decreased vomiting events in comparison with opioids. NSAIDs also form a core component in management of postureteroscopy pain and have been demonstrated in randomized trials to have equivalent to improved pain control outcomes compared with opioids. Multiple opioid-free pathways have been described for postureteroscopy analgesia with need for rescue narcotics falling under 20% in most studies, including in patients with ureteral stents. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols after percutaneous nephrolithotomy are less well described but have yielded a reduction in postoperative opioid requirements. Conclusions: In select patients, both acute renal colic and after kidney stone surgery, adequate pain management can usually be obtained with minimal or no opioid medication. NSAIDs form the core of most described opioid-sparing pathways for both ureteroscopy and PCNL, with the contribution of other components to postoperative pain outcomes limited because of lack of head-to-head comparisons. However, medications aimed specifically at targeting stent-related discomfort form a key component of most multimodal postsurgical pain management pathways. Further investigation is needed to develop pathways in patients unable to tolerate NSAIDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson J S Cabo
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nicole L Miller
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khargi R, Yaghoubian AJ, Blake RM, Ricapito A, Connors C, Gallante B, Khusid JA, Atallah W, Gupta M. Opioid-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an initial experience. World J Urol 2023; 41:3113-3119. [PMID: 37733089 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04600-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The opioid epidemic in the United States is an ongoing public health crisis that is in part fueled by excessive prescribing by physicians. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a procedure that conventionally involves opioid prescriptions for adequate post-operative pain control. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a non-opioid pain regimen by evaluating post-operative outcomes in PCNL patients discharged without opioids. MATERIALS AND METHODS As a quality improvement measure to reduce opioid consumption our department began routinely prescribing oral ketorolac instead of oxycodone-acetaminophen for pain control after PCNL. We retrospectively compared patients undergoing PCNL who had received ketorolac prescriptions (NSAID) to those who received oxycodone-acetaminophen prescriptions (NARC). Demographic, operative, and post-operative factors were obtained and compared in both groups. Peri-operative factors and demographics were compared using either Chi-squared tests, Mann-Whitney U tests. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups using Chi-squared tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether ketorolac use was an independent predictor of post-surgical pain-related encounters. Primary outcome was unplanned pain-related healthcare encounters inclusive of office phone calls, unscheduled office visits, and emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary outcome measures were non-pain-related healthcare encounters, hospital readmissions, pain-related rescue medications prescribed, and post-op complications. RESULTS There were similar demographics and peri-operative characteristics amongst patients in both cohorts. There was no significant difference identified between NSAID and NARC regarding unplanned pain-related encounters (8/70, 11.4% vs. 10/70, 14.3%, p = 0.614). However, NARC experienced more unplanned phone calls (42, 60% vs. 24, 34.3%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed only prior stone surgery was predictive of pain-related encounters after PCNL (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION Our results show that there were no significant differences in pain-related encounters between those who received ketorolac and oxycodone-acetaminophen following PCNL. A non-opioid pathway may mitigate the potential risk associated with opioid prescription without compromising analgesia. Prospective comparative studies are warranted to confirm feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Khargi
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Ryan M Blake
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Ricapito
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Blair Gallante
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - William Atallah
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mantu Gupta
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prebay ZJ, Foss H, Ebbott D, Li M, Chung PH. Oxycodone prescription after inflatable penile prosthesis has risks of persistent use: a TriNetX analysis. Int J Impot Res 2023:10.1038/s41443-023-00760-y. [PMID: 37679464 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00760-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
We sought to evaluate the impact of Oxycodone prescriptions on short-term patient outcomes and long-term Oxycodone use following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. We queried the TriNetX research database for all adult patients undergoing IPP. Cohorts included opioid naïve patients prescribed postoperative Oxycodone against propensity score-matched patients without a prescription. We compared return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 14 and 90 days of surgery, a diagnosis of opioid abuse or dependence disorder 6 months or later after surgery and persistent Oxycodone use 9-15 months after surgery. After matching, there were 2433 patients in each group. There was an increase in 90-day ED visits based on receipt of Oxycodone (6.8% of patients vs 5.0%, risk ratio (RR) 1.4 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.1, 1.7]). Groups had similar 14-day ED visits (3.7% of patients vs 2.9%, RR 1.3, 95% CI [0.95, 1.7]). Patients prescribed Oxycodone (5.1% of patients vs 2.7%, RR 1.9, 95% CI [1.4, 2.6]) were more likely to have persistent Oxycodone use at 9-15 months. There were low instances of diagnosis of opioid dependence or abuse for both groups limiting comparison. Oxycodone prescription after IPP has risks of persistent use and withholding Oxycodone does not appear to increase postoperative healthcare utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary J Prebay
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Halle Foss
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Ebbott
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Li
- Center for Digital Health and Data Science, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul H Chung
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Toprak H, Başaran B, Toprak ŞS, Et T, Kumru N, Korkusuz M, Bilge A, Yarımoğlu R. Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block for Quality of Recovery in Bariatric Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg 2023; 33:2640-2651. [PMID: 37488349 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06748-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain management after bariatric surgery is difficult due to different physiological properties and high sensitivity toward opioids in patients with obesity. It has been reported that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) contributes to postoperative analgesia when applied together with multimodal analgesia. METHODS Eighty patients were randomized either bilateral ESPB (group E) each side or no block (group C). Our primary aim was to evaluate the effects of ESPB on the quality of recovery 24 h postoperatively in bariatric surgery by using 40-item Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire. Postoperative pain assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), time of additional analgesic requirement, analgesic consumption, side effects, sedation, mobilization time, and postoperative complications were evaluated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS Postoperative mean QoR-40 scores were found to be higher in group E (175.02 ± 11.25) than in group C (167.78 ± 18.59) at the postoperative 24th hour (P < 0.05). Pain scores at rest and during movement were higher in group C than in group E. At the postoperative 24th hour, NRS mean SD scores at rest for group C and group E were 3.25 ± 1.32 and 2.40 ± 0.96, respectively. NRS mean SD scores during movement for groups C and E were 3.88 ± 1.49 and 3.12 ± 1.30, respectively. The total amount of tramadol consumed in the first 24 h in group C and group E were mean SD: 86.40 ± 69.60 and 40.00 ± 46.96, respectively; P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS ESPB improved postoperative quality of recovery, reduced NRS scores, and total analgesic consumption in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05020379.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatice Toprak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Yunus Emre Campus, 70200, Karaman, Turkey.
| | - Betül Başaran
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Yunus Emre Campus, 70200, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Şükrü S Toprak
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Yunus Emre Campus, 70200, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Tayfun Et
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Yunus Emre Campus, 70200, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Nuh Kumru
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Karaman Training and Research Hospital, University Mh. Martyr Ömer Halis, Demir Caddesi Blok No: 7 No: 1, 70200, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Korkusuz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Yunus Emre Campus, 70200, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Ayşegül Bilge
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Yunus Emre Campus, 70200, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Rafet Yarımoğlu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Karaman Training and Research Hospital, University Mh. Martyr Ömer Halis, Demir Caddesi Blok No: 7 No: 1, 70200, Karaman, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sandbrink F, Murphy JL, Johansson M, Olson JL, Edens E, Clinton-Lont J, Sall J, Spevak C. The Use of Opioids in the Management of Chronic Pain: Synopsis of the 2022 Updated U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:388-397. [PMID: 36780654 DOI: 10.7326/m22-2917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
DESCRIPTION In May 2022, leadership within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) approved a joint clinical practice guideline for the use of opioids when managing chronic pain. This synopsis summarizes the recommendations that the authors believe are the most important to highlight. METHODS In December 2020, the VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group assembled a team to update the 2017 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain. The guideline development team included clinical stakeholders and conformed to the National Academy of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. The guideline team developed key questions to guide a systematic evidence review that was done by an independent third party and distilled 20 recommendations for care using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The guideline team also created 3 one-page algorithms to help guide clinical decision making. This synopsis presents the recommendations and highlights selected recommendations on the basis of clinical relevance. RECOMMENDATIONS This guideline is intended for clinicians who may be considering opioid therapy to manage patients with chronic pain. This synopsis reviews updated recommendations for the initiation and continuation of opioid therapy; dose, duration, and taper of opioids; screening, assessment, and evaluation; and risk mitigation. New additions are highlighted, including recommendations about the use of buprenorphine instead of full agonist opioids; assessing for behavioral health conditions and factors associated with higher risk for harm, such as pain catastrophizing; and the use of pain and opioid education to reduce the risk for prolonged opioid use for postsurgical pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friedhelm Sandbrink
- National Pain Management, Opioid Safety, and Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, Veterans Health Administration, Washington DC VA Medical Center, and Department of Neurology, George Washington University, Washington, DC (F.S.)
| | - Jennifer L Murphy
- Pain Management, Opioid Safety, and Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC (J.L.M.)
| | - Melanie Johansson
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (M.J.)
| | | | - Ellen Edens
- Opioid Reassessment Clinic, Yale Addiction Psychiatry Service, National TeleMental Health Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut (E.E.)
| | | | - James Sall
- Evidence Based Practice, Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC (J.S.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chang C, Nikolavsky D, Ong M, Simhan J. Pain management strategies in urethral reconstruction: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2022; 11:1442-1451. [PMID: 36386256 PMCID: PMC9641060 DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Few investigations explore pain recovery comprehensively following urethral reconstruction, and understanding pain pathways that lead to discomfort following reconstruction has posed challenges. Options for pain control aside from opioids continue to be in the early forms of investigation, and remain an important strategy to combat the well-documented burden of the opioid epidemic. We conduct a detailed assessment of pain pathways in patients undergoing urethral reconstruction and further outline non-narcotic based pain management strategies in those undergoing urethroplasty. METHODS We performed a literature review to describe pain pathways involved in urethral reconstruction with buccal graft, and postoperative pain recovery. We searched for pain management techniques performed by fields similar to urology, and those being utilized in urethroplasty with buccal graft. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS Innervation of the penoscrotal areas and mouth are well-defined, but understanding postoperative pain after urethroplasty remains a challenge. Preventative analgesia, nerve blocks, and multimodal analgesia have been employed by colorectal and gynecological surgeons. Urologists have utilized similar techniques for patients undergoing urethral reconstruction with buccal graft. CONCLUSIONS Few investigations explore pain recovery comprehensively following urethral reconstruction, but we believe that utilizing a combination of preventative analgesia, nerve blocks, and multimodal analgesia will have acceptable outcomes in post-surgical patients undergoing recovery. Additional work is required to further explore how combined pain management strategies can optimally reduce postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrystal Chang
- Division of Urologic Oncology and Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dmitriy Nikolavsky
- Department of Urology, State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Melody Ong
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Jay Simhan
- Division of Urologic Oncology and Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Iida H, Yamaguchi S, Goyagi T, Sugiyama Y, Taniguchi C, Matsubara T, Yamada N, Yonekura H, Iida M. Consensus statement on smoking cessation in patients with pain. J Anesth 2022; 36:671-687. [PMID: 36069935 PMCID: PMC9666296 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-022-03097-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Smoking is closely associated with the development of various cancers and tobacco-related illnesses such as cardiovascular and respiratory disorders. However, data are scarce on the relationship between smoking and both acute and chronic pain. In addition to nicotine, tobacco smoke contains more than 4000 different compounds. Although nicotine is not the sole cause of smoking-induced diseases, it plays a critical role in pain-related pathophysiology. Despite the acute analgesic effects of nicotine, long-term exposure leads to tolerance and increased pain sensitivity due to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization and neuronal plastic changes. The purpose of smoking cessation interventions in smoking patients with pain is primarily not only to reduce their pain and associated limitations in activities of daily living, but also to improve the outcomes of underlying pain-causing conditions and reduce the risks of tobacco-related disorders. This statement aims to summarize the available evidence on the impact of smoking on pain and to inform medical professionals of the significance of smoking cessation in patients with pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Iida
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan. .,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan. .,Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, Central Japan International Medical Center, 1-1 Kenkonomachi, Minokamo, Gifu, 505-8510, Japan.
| | - Shigeki Yamaguchi
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Toru Goyagi
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Yoko Sugiyama
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Woman Doctor Active Support in Perioperative Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.,Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, Central Japan International Medical Center, 1-1 Kenkonomachi, Minokamo, Gifu, 505-8510, Japan
| | - Chie Taniguchi
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan.,College of Nursing, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Takako Matsubara
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe , Japan
| | - Naoto Yamada
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Iwate, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yonekura
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mami Iida
- Working Group on the Role of Smoking Cessation in Pain Relief, The Japan Society of Pain Clinicians (JSPC), Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jones CA, Pekala KR, Armann KM, Maganty A, Yabes JG, Bandari J, Yu M, Davies BJ, Jacobs BL. Opioid-Free Ureteroscopy: Are Academic Urologists Lagging Behind Private Practice? Urology 2022; 167:56-60. [PMID: 35780945 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine overall trends in opioid prescribing after ureteroscopy and compared opioid use between private and academic practice settings. We also analyzed the potential for spillover effect from an unrelated opioid-reduction initiative for major oncologic surgery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of all ureteroscopies performed within our system at four distinct time points from 2016-2019. We recorded the type and number of opioid pills prescribed and calculated oral morphine equivalents. Analysis included comparison between community and academic hospitals as well as pre- and post-initiative. RESULTS 555 patients undergoing ureteroscopy and 29 attending surgeons were included in the analysis. The median prescription size per ureteroscopy decreased throughout the study period in both the private and academic settings. From 2016-2017, median oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) decreased from 60 to 0 in the private setting and remained at 0 for the duration of the study period. Opioid reduction in the academic setting lagged behind private practitioners but median OMEs did steadily decrease to 0 in 2019. No significant spillover effect was observed. CONCLUSION Since 2016, opioid prescribing following ureteroscopy has decreased in both the private and academic practice settings. Notably, private practice urologists achieved a median of 0 opioids 2 years prior to academic urologists. These data suggest that, in some circumstances, academic institutions may have been slower to respond to the opioid epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kody M Armann
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Jonathan G Yabes
- Center for Research on Health Care, Pittsburgh, PA; UPMC Division of General Internal Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bamberger JN, Gallante B, Khusid JA, Yaghoubian A, Sadiq A, Shimonov R, Zampini AM, Chandhoke RA, Atallah W, Gupta M. A prospective randomized study evaluating the necessity of narcotics following ureteroscopy for urinary stone disease. World J Urol 2022; 40:2567-2573. [PMID: 35915267 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04099-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of non-narcotic analgesics and preoperative counseling in managing postoperative pain and narcotic use following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URS). METHODS Adult patients at a single academic center undergoing URS for nephrourolithiasis were recruited. After informed consent, subjects were randomized into three groups: NARC-15 tablets oxycodone-acetaminophen 5/325 mg (A-OXY), 2. NSAID-15 tablets ibuprofen (IBU) 600 mg, 3. CNSL-15 tablets A-OXY, 15 tablets IBU, and preoperative counseling from the surgeon to avoid narcotic if possible. Patients who did not receive an intraoperative stent were excluded. At the time of stent removal subjects completed the Universal Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), and a pill count was performed. USSQ pain indices were the primary study endpoint. RESULTS Of 115 patients enrolled, 104 met the primary endpoint and were included in the analysis. No significant differences were noted in patient demographic, clinical, or operative characteristics. No differences were noted in median USSQ pain indices. The CNSL group used a significantly lower median number of A-OXY pills compared to the NARC group (2.4 vs. 5.4, p = 0.001) and less IBU compared to the NSAID group (3.1 vs. 5.9, p = 0.008). No differences in median total pill count, office calls, medication requests, nor ED visits were noted. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that patients can achieve equivalent postoperative analgesic satisfaction with non-narcotics compared to opiates following URS. Further, counseling patients on postoperative pain before surgery can reduce the total number of postoperative narcotic and non-narcotic medications taken. We suggest surgeons strongly consider omission of narcotic prescriptions following non-complicated URS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob N Bamberger
- SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, 425 West 59th Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY, 10019, USA.
| | - Blair Gallante
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Johnathan A Khusid
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Alan Yaghoubian
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Areeba Sadiq
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Roman Shimonov
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | | | | | - William Atallah
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Mantu Gupta
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine: (1) incidence of "opioid never events" (ONEs), defined as the development of opioid dependence or overdose in an opioid-naive surgical patient who is prescribed opioids postoperatively and (2) risk factors predicting ONEs. BACKGROUND Patients receiving opioids after surgery are at risk of experiencing life-threatening opioid-related adverse events. METHODS An electronic medical record review identified surgical patients at an academic medical center between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, followed through March 31, 2020. ONEs were determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/10th Revision (ICD-9/10) codes, and electronic medical record review. RESULTS A total of 35,335 opioid-naive surgical patients received a perioperative opioid prescription. The median follow-up was 3.47 years (range: 1.25-5.25 years). ONEs occurred in 0.19% (67/35,335) of patients. The ONE rate was 5.6 per 10,000 person-years of follow-up. Ten of 67 ONE patients overdosed on opioids. The median time to ONE was 1.6 years; the highest ONE rate was observed 1 to 2 years after surgery. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving opioid prescriptions 90 to 180 or 90 to 360 days after surgery had the highest risk of developing ONEs [hazard ratio (HR)=6.39, confidence interval (CI): 3.72-10.973; HR=6.87, CI: 4.24-11.12, respectively]. Surgical specialty (HR=5.21, 2.65-0.23) and patient age (HR=4.17, CI: 2.50-6.96) were also risk factors for ONEs. Persistent opioid use 90 to 360 days after surgery was present in 45% of patients developing ONEs. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative opioid dependence or overdose is a significant health problem, affecting roughly 2 per 1000 opioid-naive surgical patients prescribed an opioid and followed for 5 years. Risk factors for the development of ONEs include opioid use 3 to 12 months after surgery, patient age, and surgical procedure.
Collapse
|
17
|
Patient Factors Associated with High Opioid Consumption after Common Surgical Procedures Following State-Mandated Opioid Prescription Regulations. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:1033-1043. [PMID: 35703794 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND State regulations have decreased prescribed opioids with more than 25% of patients abstaining from opioids. Despite this, 2 distinct populations of patients exist who consume "high" or "low" amounts of opioids. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with postoperative opioid use after common surgical procedures and develop an opioid risk score. STUDY DESIGN Patients undergoing 35 surgical procedures from 7 surgical specialties were identified at a 620-bed tertiary care academic center and surveyed 1 week after discharge regarding opioid use and adequacy of analgesia. Electronic medical record data were used to characterize postdischarge opioids, complications, demographics, medical history, and social factors. High opioid use was defined as >75th percentile morphine milligram equivalents for each procedure. An opioid risk score was calculated from factors associated with opioid use identified by backward multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 1,185 patients were enrolled between September 2017 and February 2019. Bivariate analyses revealed patient factors associated with opioid use including earlier substance use (p < 0.001), depression (p = 0.003), anxiety (p < 0.001), asthma (p = 0.006), obesity (p = 0.03), migraine (p = 0.004), opioid use in the 7 days before surgery (p < 0.001), and 31 Clinical Classifications Software Refined classifications (p < 0.05). Significant multivariates included: insurance (p = 0.005), employment status (p = 0.005), earlier opioid use (odds ratio [OR] 2.38 [95% CI 1.21 to 4.68], p = 0.01), coronary artery disease (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.86], p = 0.02), acute pulmonary embolism (OR 9.81 [95% CI 3.01 to 32.04], p < 0.001), benign breast conditions (OR 3.42 [95% CI 1.76 to 6.64], p < 0.001), opioid-related disorders (OR 6.67 [95% CI 1.87 to 23.75], p = 0.003), mental and substance use disorders (OR 3.80 [95% CI 1.47 to 9.83], p = 0.006), headache (OR 1.82 [95% CI 1.24 to 2.67], p = 0.002), and previous cesarean section (OR 5.10 [95% CI 1.33 to 19.56], p = 0.02). An opioid risk score base was developed with an area under the curve of 0.696 for the prediction of high opioid use. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative patient characteristics associated with high opioid use postoperatively were identified and an opioid risk score was derived. Identification of patients with a higher need for opioids presents an opportunity for improved preoperative interventions, the use of nonopioid analgesic therapies, and alternative therapies.
Collapse
|
18
|
Strategies aimed at preventing long-term opioid use in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:238. [PMID: 35277150 PMCID: PMC8917706 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05044-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Long-term opioid use, which may have significant individual and societal impacts, has been documented in up to 20% of patients after trauma or orthopaedic surgery. The objectives of this scoping review were to systematically map the research on strategies aiming to prevent chronic opioid use in these populations and to identify knowledge gaps in this area.
Methods
This scoping review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. We searched seven databases and websites of relevant organizations. Selected studies and guidelines were published between January 2008 and September 2021. Preventive strategies were categorized as: system-based, pharmacological, educational, multimodal, and others. We summarized findings using measures of central tendency and frequency along with p-values. We also reported the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations presented in clinical guidelines.
Results
A total of 391 studies met the inclusion criteria after initial screening from which 66 studies and 20 guidelines were selected. Studies mainly focused on orthopaedic surgery (62,1%), trauma (30.3%) and spine surgery (7.6%). Among system-based strategies, hospital-based individualized opioid tapering protocols, and regulation initiatives limiting the prescription of opioids were associated with statistically significant decreases in morphine equivalent doses (MEDs) at 1 to 3 months following trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Among pharmacological strategies, only the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and beta blockers led to a significant reduction in MEDs up to 12 months after orthopaedic surgery. Most studies on educational strategies, multimodal strategies and psychological strategies were associated with significant reductions in MEDs beyond 1 month. The majority of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines were of low level of evidence.
Conclusions
This scoping review advances knowledge on existing strategies to prevent long-term opioid use in trauma and orthopaedic surgery patients. We observed that system-based, educational, multimodal and psychological strategies are the most promising. Future research should focus on determining which strategies should be implemented particularly in trauma patients at high risk for long-term use, testing those that can promote a judicious prescription of opioids while preventing an illicit use, and evaluating their effects on relevant patient-reported and social outcomes.
Collapse
|
19
|
Patel AB, Satarasinghe PN, Valencia V, Wenzel JL, Webb JC, Wolf JS, Osterberg EC. Opiate Prescriptions Vary among Common Urologic Procedures: A Claims Dataset Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11051329. [PMID: 35268419 PMCID: PMC8911322 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to better understand differences in the total days’ supply and fills of common opiates following urologic procedures. Materials and Methods: The Truven Health MarketScan® database was used to extract CPT codes from adults 18 years or older who underwent a urologic procedure with 90-day follow-up from 2012−2015 within the Austin−Round Rock, Texas metropolitan service area. A multivariate analysis and first hurdle modeling with a logistic outcome for any opiates was used to (1) assess differences in opioid prescribing patterns, (2) investigate opioid prescription outcomes, and (3) explore variability among opiate prescription patterns across seven urologic procedure categories. Results: Among the 2312 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 23.7% received an opiate, with an average total day’s supply of 6.20 (range 2.61−10.59). The proportion of patients receiving opiates varied significantly by procedure type (p = 0.028). Patients that had reconstructive procedures had the highest proportion of any opiates and the highest number of mean opiate prescriptions among the seven procedure categories (42% received opiates, p = 0.028, mean opiate prescriptions were 1.0 among all patients, p = 0.026). After adjustments, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing reconstructive procedures filled more opiate prescriptions (odds ratio (OR) = 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00−3.50, p = 0.05) compared to other subcategories. Of those that received opiates, reconstructive patients had a shorter time to fills (mean −18.4 days, CI −8.40 to −28.50, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients undergoing reconstructive procedures are prescribed and fill more opiates compared to other common urological procedures. The standardization and implementation of postoperative pain regimens may help curtail this variability.
Collapse
|
20
|
Butler C, Mmonu N, Cohen AJ, Rios N, Huang CY, Breyer BN. Pre-Operative Assessment Tool To Predict Post-operative Pain and Opioid Use in Outpatient Urologic Surgery. Urology 2021; 161:19-24. [PMID: 34929239 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better understand the pain requirements of urologic patients in the post-operative outpatient setting. Healthcare providers are one of the leading contributors to the current opioid epidemic. Understanding opioid prescribing practices and patients' narcotic requirements while not over-prescribing opioids is a public health priority. METHODS We conducted a prospective study to examine opioid consumption among adult patients who presented for outpatient urologic surgery at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and Zuckerberg San Francisco General (ZSFG) hospitals. We administered a Pre-Operative Pain Requirement Assessment Tool (POPRAT) electronically via text message 3 days prior to surgery to identify objective factors that may predict post-operative pain and opioid requirements. Patients were followed for 7 days post-operatively, in a similar fashion, to assess daily pain and opioid use. RESULTS 264 participants were eligible for the study and 211 completed the study. Urology patients undergoing outpatient elective procedures used a mean of 5 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (SD=14.9) in a 7-day period. Women and patients less than 45 years of age had the highest opioid use. Based on the POPRAT, major predictors of post-operative pain were pre-operative anxiety (0.34 estimate, p value < 0.001) and anticipated pain (0.34 estimate, p value < 0.001). Anticipated opioid use, however, did not predict actual opioid use. CONCLUSIONS Urologic outpatient surgeries require minimal opioids for pain management. The POPRAT may help identify which patients may experience more pain after surgery. Certain factors such as age and gender may need to be considered when prescribing opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi Butler
- University of California San Francisco; Oregon Health and Science University.
| | - Nnenaya Mmonu
- New York University; University of California San Francisco
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Beksac AT, Wilson CA, Lenfant L, Kim S, Aminsharifi A, Zeinab MA, Kaouk J. Single-Port Mini-Pfannenstiel Robotic Pyeloplasty: Establishing a Non-Narcotic Pathway Along with A Same-Day Discharge Protocol. Urology 2021; 160:130-135. [PMID: 34710396 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the feasibility of a same day discharge protocol following SP robotic pyeloplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS From a single institution series, 23 patients (12 multi-port (MP), 11 single-port (SP)) who underwent primary robotic dismembered pyeloplasty between February 2018 and March 2021 were analyzed. The association between baseline and perioperative characteristics with functional outcome was analyzed using, chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann Whitney U and t-tests. RESULTS All SP cases were completed using the mini Pfannenstiel incision without the need for conversion or additional ports. Baseline characteristics were comparable. No intraoperative complications were seen. Only one patient in the SP group had a Clavien II complication. All patients in the MP group had a drain placed, whereas drain was not placed in the SP group. Length of stay was shorter in the SP group (11.4 vs. 42.6 hours, p<0.001). Although visual analog pain score was comparable at discharge (p=0.633), the SP group had lower opioid usage (morphine milligram equivalent) in the hospital (p<0.001) and a lower rate of opioid prescription during discharge (18.2% vs. 91.7% p<0.001). At a median follow-up of 8 months, no patients had flank pain and all patients had good kidney drainage on follow-up images. CONCLUSIONS Single-port robotic dismembered pyeloplasty through a mini-Pfannenstiel access allows a same-day discharge protocol with minimal opiate use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alp Tuna Beksac
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Clark A Wilson
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Louis Lenfant
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Soodong Kim
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ali Aminsharifi
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mahmoud Abou Zeinab
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hacker EC, Pere MM, Yu M, Gul ZG, Jacobs BL, Davies BJ. Large Variation in International Prescribing Rates of Opioids After Robotic Prostatectomy. Urology 2021; 159:93-99. [PMID: 34678308 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare international opioid prescribing patterns for patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess international opioid prescribing trends among urologists. METHODS An anonymous Web-based survey assessing the frequency and quantity of opioid prescriptions for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy was designed using Qualtrics software. The survey was distributed to urologists internationally via Twitter and email in early 2021. Prescribing patterns were analyzed based on country of practice in three groups: United States, Canada, and all other countries. RESULTS 160 participants from 26 countries completed the survey including the United States (51%), Greece (19%), Canada (9%), Israel (3.1%). The percentage of providers prescribing post-discharge opioids significantly differed between Canada, the United States, and other countries (86%, 63%, and 11%, respectively, P <.0001). There was a significant difference between years of experience in those who provide opioids compared to those who do not (8 years vs 5 years, P = .0004). The average morphine milligram equivalents (MME) provided in those who did prescribe opioids was greatest in the United States but was not significantly different between groups (mean MME: United States 58 mg, Canada 46 mg, all others 54 mg; P = .63). Attending physicians prescribed more MME than trainees (residents, fellows) on average (attending mean MME = 75 mg, trainee mean MME = 40 mg, P = .017). CONCLUSION Opioid prescriptions after robotic assisted prostatectomy are common in North America and used sparingly in the rest of the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Hacker
- University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - Maria M Pere
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Urology, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Michelle Yu
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Urology, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Zeynep G Gul
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Urology, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Bruce L Jacobs
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Urology, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Benjamin J Davies
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Urology, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
DeWitt-Foy ME, Gao T, Schold J, Abouassaly R. Stones and Moans: Higher Number of Nephrolithiasis Related Encounters Increases the Odds of Opioid Misuse. Urology 2021; 160:75-80. [PMID: 34653430 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between kidney stones and risk of subsequent opioid misuse. METHODS The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) inpatient, ambulatory, and emergency department databases from 4 states were queried to identify associations with a primary diagnosis code related to kidney stones followed by a diagnosis of opioid abuse, dependence, or overdose between 2005, and 2015. Logistic regression was performed to determine the strength and significance of the relationship between number of primary kidney stone episodes and subsequent diagnosis of opioid misuse. RESULTS The final cohort included 783,929 patients across 4 states. On multivariable analysis the number of primary stone encounters (PSE) was strongly associated with the risk of developing an opioid-related disorder (ORD) when adjusting for relevant covariates (odds ratio 1.3). Patients seen in the emergency department (OR 1.4) and those treated in Iowa (OR 2.9) were at higher risk for ORD than those seen in different contexts or states. Younger age increased the strength of this association. Higher income (OR 0.7) and non-white race (OR 0.7) reduced the risk of ORD, while a diagnosis of chronic pain (OR 3.5) increased risk. CONCLUSION Risk of subsequent diagnosis of ORD is increased in patients who have multiple episodes of care related to kidney stones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly E DeWitt-Foy
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH.
| | | | - Jesse Schold
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Robert Abouassaly
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Opioid Prescribing Patterns for Ulcerative Keratitis. Cornea 2021; 41:484-490. [PMID: 34620771 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to characterize rates of opioid prescription for different ulcerative keratitis types. METHODS This cohort study included patients diagnosed with ulcerative keratitis according to the University of Michigan electronic health record data between September 1, 2014 and December 22, 2020. Ulcerative keratitis was categorized by etiologic type (bacterial, fungal, viral, acanthamoeba, inflammatory, polymicrobial, or unspecified) using rule-based data classification that accounted for billing diagnosis code, antimicrobial or antiinflammatory medications prescribed, laboratory results, and manual chart review. Opioid prescriptions were converted to morphine milligram equivalent and summed over 90 days from diagnosis. Opioid prescription rate and amount were compared between ulcerative keratitis types. RESULTS Of 3322 patients with ulcerative keratitis, 173 (5.2%) were prescribed at least 1 opioid for pain management within 90 days of diagnosis. More patients with acanthamoeba (32.4%), fungal (21.1%), and polymicrobial (25.0%) keratitis were treated with opioids compared with bacterial (6.7%), unspecified (2.9%), or viral (1.8%) keratitis (all Bonferroni adjusted P < 0.05). For the 173 patients who were prescribed opioids, a total of 353 prescriptions were given within 90 days of diagnosis, with half given within the first week after diagnosis. The quantity of opioid prescribed within 90 days from diagnosis was not significantly different between ulcerative keratitis types (P = 0.6559). Morphine milligram equivalent units prescribed ranged from 97.5 for acanthamoeba keratitis to 112.5 for fungal keratitis. CONCLUSIONS The type of ulcerative keratitis may influence the opioid prescription rate. Providers can better serve patients needing opioids for pain management through improved characterization of pain and development of more tailored pain management regimens.
Collapse
|
25
|
Butler C, Kornberg Z, Copp HL. Practitioner counseling associated with improved opioid disposal among families of postoperative pediatric patients. J Pediatr Urol 2021; 17:634.e1-634.e7. [PMID: 34479805 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Death from opioid-related overdose has doubled in recent years. Interestingly, there has been a similar increase in the number of opioid prescriptions. Medical providers, unfortunately, have contributed towards this rise in prescriptions. To combat the opioid epidemic, numerous efforts have been made to focus on the medical field and its role in the opioid epidemic. Proposed solutions for reduction of circulating opioids have included such measures as education, monitoring programs, alternative pain management strategies, and improved opioid disposal. OBJECTIVES We aimed to assess if counseling is associated with proper opioid disposal among families of post-operative pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a cross-sectional, convenience sample study of families of post-surgical, pediatric patients at a single academic institution. Participants completed a survey during their postoperative visit assessing opioid requirements, storage and disposal during and after the postoperative period, and if they were counseled by any medical professional on proper disposal methods. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between the independent variables and the primary outcome. RESULTS We enrolled 180 participants, mean age of 8 years. Thirty-four percent reported having no opioid medication remaining at follow up because the medication was either consumed or the prescription was not filled. Sixty-six percent had leftover medication at the time of follow up. Sixty-six percent of participants knew the proper opioid disposal methods. However, only 22% of patients with leftover medication properly disposed of the medication. Patients who were counseled about proper opioid disposal were 3 times more likely to practice proper disposal practices than those who were not (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION Our study uniquely look at opioid consumption, disposal rates, and the effect of counseling in a diverse post-surgical pediatric population. Our findings confirm similar observations in the literature with regards to low opioid consumption, but in a larger, more surgically diverse cohort with a 100% response rate. Limitations included a lack of demographic diversity and lack of data measuring the impact of timing or frequency of counseling on opioid disposal practices. Further research goals would be to evaluate the effectiveness of counseling on proper opioid disposal, and the influence of timing and various counseling methods. CONCLUSIONS Most patients do not use all of their opioid medication prescription. Proper opioid disposal counseling by a medical professional may play an important role in adherence to recommended opioid disposal practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi Butler
- University of California San Francisco, 1825 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Zachary Kornberg
- University of California San Francisco, 1825 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA; Stanford University, 300 Pastuer Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Hillary L Copp
- University of California San Francisco, 1825 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nadeau SE, Wu JK, Lawhern RA. Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2021; 2:721357. [PMID: 35295493 PMCID: PMC8915556 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.721357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted an analytic review of the clinical scientific literature bearing on the use of opioids for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in the United States. There is substantial, albeit not definitive, scientific evidence of the effectiveness of opioids in treating pain and of high variability in opioid dose requirements and side effects. The estimated risk of death from opioid treatment involving doses above 100 MMED is ~0.25%/year. Multiple large studies refute the concept that short-term use of opioids to treat acute pain predisposes to development of opioid use disorder. The prevalence of opioid use disorder associated with prescription opioids is likely <3%. Morbidity, mortality, and financial costs of inadequate treatment of the 18 million Americans with moderate to severe chronic pain are high. Because of the absence of comparative effectiveness studies, there are no scientific grounds for considering alternative non-pharmacologic treatments as an adequate substitute for opioid therapy but these treatments might serve to augment opioid therapy, thereby reducing dosage. There are reasons to question the ostensible risks of co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. As the causes of the opioid crisis have come into focus, it has become clear that the crisis resides predominantly in the streets and that efforts to curtail it by constraining opioid treatment in the clinic are unlikely to succeed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen E. Nadeau
- Research Service and the Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center and the Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
- *Correspondence: Stephen E. Nadeau
| | | | - Richard A. Lawhern
- Independent Researcher and Patient Advocate, Fort Mill, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wackerbarth JJ, Ham SA, Aizen J, Richgels J, Faris SF. Persistent Opioid Usage After Urologic Intervention and the Impact of Tramadol. Urology 2021; 157:114-119. [PMID: 34333038 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if patients who receive tramadol are as likely to develop persistent usage compared to other opioids after urologic surgery and procedures. METHODS We identified adults 18 to 64 years old who underwent a urologic procedure in the years 2014 to 2017 using the Truven MarketScan database and subsequently filled an opioid prescription within two weeks of discharge. Patients were excluded if they had any previous opioid prescriptions in the year before surgery. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to estimate influence of type of opioid on discharge and various comorbidities on persistent use to determine if persistent use was related to the choice of discharge opioid. We also compared these rates to a 1:3 comorbidities matched, non-surgical cohort of patients from the general population. RESULTS Overall, 115,687 patients were included. After 1 year, 14.8% of the urologic surgery cohort had persistent opioid usage compared to 10.8% in the opioid naïve matched non-surgical cohort (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.35-1.39). Discharge with tramadol was associated with a higher odd of persistent usage compared to class II opioids controlling for type of urologic surgery, age, gender, and pain related comorbidities (OR = 1.23 95% CI 1.13-1.35). The odds of persistent usage varied slightly by type of urologic procedure, but all were higher than matched non-surgical cohort. CONCLUSION Patients developed persistent opiate usage after urologic surgery compared to a comorbidity matched non-surgical cohort. In this model, tramadol specifically was associated with higher odds of novel persistent opioid usage compared to other opioids. Urologists should not consider tramadol to be a safer choice with regard to developing persistent usage and consider prospective validation of these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sandra A Ham
- Center for Health and the Social Services, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Joshua Aizen
- Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - John Richgels
- Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Sarah F Faris
- Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Winoker JS, Koo K, Alam R, Matlaga B. Opioid-sparing analgesic effects of peripheral nerve blocks in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. J Endourol 2021; 36:38-46. [PMID: 34314232 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multimodal analgesia regimens incorporating peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have demonstrated reduced postoperative pain, opioid use, and recovery time in various disease states. However, this remains a subject of limited investigation in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) domain. In the face of an ongoing opioid epidemic and collective push to enhance prescribing stewardship, we sought to examine the potential opioid-sparing effect of PNB in PCNL. METHODS A systematic review of Embase and PubMed was performed to identify all randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of a PNB with general anesthesia (GA) versus GA alone for pain control following PCNL. Studies evaluating neuraxial (epidural and spinal) anesthesia and those without GA as the control arm were excluded. RESULTS Seventeen trials evaluating 1012 procedures were included. Five different blocks were identified and evaluated: paravertebral (n=8), intercostal nerve (n=3), quadratus lumborum (n=2), transversus abdominis plane (n=1), and erector spinae (n=3). 9/16 (56%) studies observed lower pain scores with PNB use throughout the 24-hour postop period. By comparison, improved pain scores with PNB were limited to the early (<6 hours) recovery period in 5 studies and 2 found no difference. Total analgesia and opioid requirements were significantly higher in the GA control arm in nearly all studies (12/14, 86%). Operative times were similar and there were no differences in rates of intercostal access or nephrostomy tube insertion between study arms in any trial. CONCLUSION While greater analgesic use with GA alone likely minimizes or obscures differences in patient-reported pain scores, PNB may offer a significant opioid-sparing analgesic effect during postoperative recovery after PCNL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared S Winoker
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1500, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205-2105;
| | - Kevin Koo
- Mayo Clinic, 6915, 200 First St SW, Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905;
| | - Ridwan Alam
- Johns Hopkins University James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, 117539, 600 N. Wolfe St., Marburg 134, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287;
| | - Brian Matlaga
- Johns Hopkins University, Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
The American opioid epidemic has led to one of the worse public health crises in recent history, and emerging evidence has highlighted the role of healthcare professionals in exposing patients and communities to potent opioid drugs. Surgeons, in treating postoperative pain, are at the forefront of this epidemic. In Urology, investigators are beginning to establish how patients handle and consume opioids following common urologic procedures in an effort to limit excess prescribing. However, there is a paucity of data to define acceptable amounts of opioid medications to adequately treat postoperative pain after urologic surgery. Many common urologic procedures are now routinely performed with robotic technology. Robotic, minimally-invasive approaches decrease incision size and accelerate postoperative recovery, thereby presenting a unique opportunity to curb excessive opioid prescribing in the postoperative patient. Herein, we explore the roots of the current crisis, outline current literature guiding pain control after surgery, and review the current, though sparse, literature that may guide urologists in decreasing opioid use after robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchika Talwar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shreyas S Joshi
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Prescribing Trends in Post-operative Pain Management After Urologic Surgery: A Quality Care Investigation for Healthcare Providers. Urology 2021; 153:156-163. [PMID: 33497720 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess prescribing and refilling trends of narcotics in postoperative urology patients at our institution. Although the opioid epidemic remains a public health threat, no series has assessed prescribing patterns across urologic surgery disciplines following discharge. METHODS All urologic surgeries were retrospectively reviewed from May 2017-April 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative pain management strategies were analyzed. Narcotics usage following surgery were reported in total morphine equivalents (TME). Opioid refill rate was characterized by medical specialty and stratified by urologic discipline. RESULTS 817 cases were reviewed. Mean age and TME at discharge was 57±15.6 years and 35.43±19.5 mg, respectively. 13.6% (mean age 55±15.9) received a narcotic refill following discharge (mean TME/refill 37.7±28.9 mg). A higher proportion of patients with a pre-operative opioid prescription received a refill compared to opioid naïve patients (38.2% vs 21.6%, P < .01). Refill rate did not differ between urologic subspecialties (P = .3). Urologists were only responsible for 20.4% of all refills filled, despite all patients continuing follow-up with their surgeon. Procedures with the highest rates of post-operative refills were in oncology, male reconstruction/trauma and endourology. Patients with a history of chronic pain (OR 1.9, CI 1.1-3.3) preoperative narcotic prescription (OR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.6), and higher ASA score (OR 1.8, CI 1.6-2.8) were more likely to obtain a postoperative opioid prescription refill. CONCLUSION Approximately 1 in 7 postoperative urology patients receive a postoperative narcotics refill; however, nearly two-thirds receive refills exclusively from non-urologic providers. Attempts to avoid overprescribing of postoperative narcotics need to account for both surgeon and nonsurgeon sources of opioid refills.
Collapse
|
31
|
Britton CJ, Findlay BL, Parikh N, Kohler T, Helo S, Ziegelmann MJ. Long-acting liposomal bupivacaine and postoperative opioid use after Peyronie's disease surgery: a pilot study. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:174-183. [PMID: 33532307 PMCID: PMC7844478 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Novel strategies have been proposed to minimize postoperative opioid use, yet many patients experience significant pain after penile surgery. Our objective was to evaluate postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing penile ring block with long-acting liposomal bupivacaine (LB; Exparel) during surgery for Peyronie's disease (PD). Methods We identified patients who underwent tunica albuginea plication (TAP) and plaque excision/grafting (PEG) for PD between July 2019 and September 2020. Intraoperatively, a ring block was administered at the penile base penis with 20 cc of LB. Patients were instructed to use over the counter pain medications as first line treatment for postoperative pain, and opioids were available for severe breakthrough pain as needed [7.5 oral morphine equivalents (OME) =5 mg oxycodone]. Opioid use was assessed during the first five days postoperatively. Results In total, 28 patients met inclusion criteria including 18/28 (64%) who underwent TAP and 10/28 (36%) who underwent PEG. Median patient age was 56 years (IGR 51;61). Median postoperative 10-point visual analogue pain score was 0 (range 0-3). Duration of penile anesthesia ranged from 1.5-4 days. In total, 9/28 patients (32%) utilized opioids during the first five days postoperatively (range 7.5-75 OME). Two patients (7%) required opioids during the first two days after surgery. 27/28 (96%) were satisfied or highly satisfied with postoperative pain control. Conclusions Intraoperative penile ring block with LB resulted in excellent pain control with local anesthetic duration of 1.5-4 days. The majority of patients did not require any opioids during the early postoperative period. Further study comparing outcomes with shorter-acting local anesthetics is necessary to balance pain control benefits with additional cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Niki Parikh
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tobias Kohler
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sevann Helo
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hameed BMZ, S. Dhavileswarapu AVL, Naik N, Karimi H, Hegde P, Rai BP, Somani BK. Big Data Analytics in urology: the story so far and the road ahead. Ther Adv Urol 2021; 13:1756287221998134. [PMID: 33747134 PMCID: PMC7940776 DOI: 10.1177/1756287221998134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has a proven record of application in the field of medicine and is used in various urological conditions such as oncology, urolithiasis, paediatric urology, urogynaecology, infertility and reconstruction. Data is the driving force of AI and the past decades have undoubtedly witnessed an upsurge in healthcare data. Urology is a specialty that has always been at the forefront of innovation and research and has rapidly embraced technologies to improve patient outcomes and experience. Advancements made in Big Data Analytics raised the expectations about the future of urology. This review aims to investigate the role of big data and its blend with AI for trends and use in urology. We explore the different sources of big data in urology and explicate their current and future applications. A positive trend has been exhibited by the advent and implementation of AI in urology with data available from several databases. The extensive use of big data for the diagnosis and treatment of urological disorders is still in its early stage and under validation. In future however, big data will no doubt play a major role in the management of urological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. M. Zeeshan Hameed
- Department of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India KMC Innovation Centre, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India iTRUE (International Training and Research in Uro-Oncology and Endourology) Group
| | | | - Nithesh Naik
- Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India
- iTRUE (International Training and Research in Uro-Oncology and Endourology) Group
| | - Hadis Karimi
- Department of Pharmacy, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Padmaraj Hegde
- Department of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Bhavan Prasad Rai
- iTRUE (International Training and Research in Uro-Oncology and Endourology) Group Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Bhaskar K. Somani
- Department of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
- iTRUE (International Training and Research in Uro-oncology and Endourology) Group Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chua ME, Zuckerman JM, Strehlow R, Virasoro R, DeLong JM, Tonkin J, McCammon KA. Liposomal Bupivacaine Local Infiltration for Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site Pain Control: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology 2020; 145:269-274. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
34
|
Abstract
An interdisciplinary pain team was established at our institution to explore options for improving pain control in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery by identifying traits that put a patient at increased risk for inadequate pain control postoperatively.
Collapse
|
35
|
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Substance Use and Association with Opioid Use Disorder in Patients with Non-malignant and Cancer Pain: a Review. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-020-00415-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
36
|
Ramírez-Maestre C, Reyes-Pérez Á, Esteve R, López-Martínez AE, Bernardes S, Jensen MP. Opioid Pain Medication Prescription for Chronic Pain in Primary Care Centers: The Roles of Pain Acceptance, Pain Intensity, Depressive Symptoms, Pain Catastrophizing, Sex, and Age. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17176428. [PMID: 32899359 PMCID: PMC7503487 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background: Psychological factors of patients may influence physicians’ decisions on prescribing opioid analgesics. However, few studies have sought to identify these factors. The present study had a double objective: (1) To identify the individual factors that differentiate patients who had been prescribed opioids for the management of chronic back pain from those who had not been prescribed opioids and (2) to determine which factors make significant and independent contributions to the prediction of opioid prescribing. Methods: A total of 675 patients from four primary care centers were included in the sample. Variables included sex, age, pain intensity, depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, and pain acceptance. Results: Although no differences were found between men and women, participants with chronic noncancer pain who were prescribed opioids were older, reported higher levels of pain intensity and depressive symptoms, and reported lower levels of pain-acceptance. An independent association was found between pain intensity and depressive symptoms and opioid prescribing. Conclusions: The findings suggest that patient factors influence physicians’ decisions on prescribing opioids. It may be useful for primary care physicians to be aware of the potential of these factors to bias their treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Ramírez-Maestre
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Facultad de Psicología, Andalucía Tech, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; (Á.R.-P.); (R.E.); (A.E.L.-M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-952-13-23-89
| | - Ángela Reyes-Pérez
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Facultad de Psicología, Andalucía Tech, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; (Á.R.-P.); (R.E.); (A.E.L.-M.)
| | - Rosa Esteve
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Facultad de Psicología, Andalucía Tech, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; (Á.R.-P.); (R.E.); (A.E.L.-M.)
| | - Alicia E. López-Martínez
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Facultad de Psicología, Andalucía Tech, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; (Á.R.-P.); (R.E.); (A.E.L.-M.)
| | - Sonia Bernardes
- Instituto Universitario de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Cis-IUL, Av. das Forças Armadas, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Mark P. Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Palumbo SA, Adamson KM, Krishnamurthy S, Manoharan S, Beiler D, Seiwell A, Young C, Metpally R, Crist RC, Doyle GA, Ferraro TN, Li M, Berrettini WH, Robishaw JD, Troiani V. Assessment of Probable Opioid Use Disorder Using Electronic Health Record Documentation. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2015909. [PMID: 32886123 PMCID: PMC7489858 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Electronic health records are a potentially valuable source of information for identifying patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether proxy measures from electronic health record data can be used reliably to identify patients with probable OUD based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5) criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed individuals within the Geisinger health system who were prescribed opioids between December 31, 2000, and May 31, 2017, using a mixed-methods approach. The cohort was identified from 16 253 patients enrolled in a contract-based, Geisinger-specific medication monitoring program (GMMP) for opioid use, including patients who maintained or violated contract terms, as well as a demographically matched control group of 16 253 patients who were prescribed opioids but not enrolled in the GMMP. Substance use diagnoses and psychiatric comorbidities were assessed using automated electronic health record summaries. A manual medical record review procedure using DSM-5 criteria for OUD was completed for a subset of patients. The analysis was conducted beginning from June 5, 2017, until May 29, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the prevalence of OUD as defined by proxy measures for DSM-5 criteria for OUD as well as the prevalence of comorbidities among patients prescribed opioids within an integrated health system. RESULTS Among the 16 253 patients enrolled in the GMMP (9309 women [57%]; mean [SD] age, 52 [14] years), OUD diagnoses as defined by diagnostic codes were present at a much lower rate than expected (291 [2%]), indicating the necessity for alternative diagnostic strategies. The DSM-5 criteria for OUD can be assessed using manual medical record review; a manual review of 200 patients in the GMMP and 200 control patients identifed a larger percentage of patients with probable moderate to severe OUD (GMMP, 145 of 200 [73%]; and control, 27 of 200 [14%]) compared with the prevalence of OUD assessed using diagnostic codes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These results suggest that patients with OUD may be identified using information available in the electronic health record, even when diagnostic codes do not reflect this diagnosis. Furthermore, the study demonstrates the utility of coding for DSM-5 criteria from medical records to generate a quantitative DSM-5 score that is associated with OUD severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A. Palumbo
- Department of Biomedical Science, Schmidt College of Medicine of Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Colt Young
- Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Raghu Metpally
- Department of Molecular and Functional Genomics, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard C. Crist
- Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Glenn A. Doyle
- Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Thomas N. Ferraro
- Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey
| | - Mingyao Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Wade H. Berrettini
- Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
- Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Janet D. Robishaw
- Department of Biomedical Science, Schmidt College of Medicine of Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton
| | - Vanessa Troiani
- Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
- Department of Imaging Science and Innovation, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
- Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
- Department of Basic Sciences, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Opiates prescribed for acute renal colic are associated with prolonged use. World J Urol 2020; 39:2183-2189. [PMID: 32740804 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03386-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients presenting with acute renal colic may be at risk of opiate abuse. We sought to analyze prescribing patterns and identify risk factors associated with prolonged opiate use during episodes of acute renal colic. METHODS Retrospective study of patients presenting with both a stone confirmed on imaging and an acute pain episode from 6/2017-2/2020. Opiate prescription data was obtained from a statewide prescribing database. Primary outcome was an opiate refill or new opiate prescription prior to resolution of the stone episode (either passage or surgery). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was performed. RESULTS A total of 271 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 52 years and 48% had a history of nephrolithiasis. 180 (66%) patients filled a new opiate prescription during their acute stone episode. Thirty-eight (14%) patients had an existing opiate prescription within 3 months of their stone episode. Seventy-four (27%) patients refilled an opiate prescription prior to stone passage or surgery. Larger stone size, need for surgery, prolonged time to treatment, existing opiate prescription, new opiate prescription at presentation, and greater initial number of pills prescribed were associated with increased risk of requiring a refill prior to stone resolution. CONCLUSIONS Patients prescribed new opiates for acute nephrolithiasis and those with an existing opioid prescription are likely to require refills before resolution of the stone episode. Larger stones that require surgery (not spontaneous passage) also increase the risk. Timely treatment of these patients and initial treatment with non-narcotics may reduce the risk of prolonged opiate use.
Collapse
|
39
|
Powell CR, Tachibana I. Opioid Use in Urologic Practice. CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-020-00576-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
40
|
Lawal OD, Gold J, Murthy A, Ruchi R, Bavry E, Hume AL, Lewkowitz AK, Brothers T, Wen X. Rate and Risk Factors Associated With Prolonged Opioid Use After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e207367. [PMID: 32584407 PMCID: PMC7317603 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Prolonged opioid use after surgery may be associated with opioid dependency and increased health care use. However, published studies have reported varying estimates of the magnitude of prolonged opioid use and risk factors associated with the transition of patients to long-term opioid use. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the rate and characteristics of patient-level risk factors associated with increased risk of prolonged use of opioids after surgery. DATA SOURCES For this systematic review and meta-analysis, a search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar from inception to August 30, 2017, was performed, with an updated search performed on June 30, 2019. Key words may include opioid analgesics, general surgery, surgical procedures, persistent opioid use, and postoperative pain. STUDY SELECTION Of 7534 articles reviewed, 33 studies were included. Studies were included if they involved participants 18 years or older, evaluated opioid use 3 or more months after surgery, and reported the rate and adjusted risk factors associated with prolonged opioid use after surgery. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. Two reviewers independently assessed and extracted the relevant data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The weighted pooled rate and odds ratios (ORs) of risk factors were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS The 33 studies included 1 922 743 individuals, with 1 854 006 (96.4%) from the US. In studies with available sex and age information, participants were mostly female (1 031 399; 82.7%) and had a mean (SD) age of 59.3 (12.8) years. The pooled rate of prolonged opioid use after surgery was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.5%-9.8%) but decreased to 1.2% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.9%) in restricted analyses involving only opioid-naive participants at baseline. The risk factors with the strongest associations with prolonged opioid use included preoperative use of opioids (OR, 5.32; 95% CI, 2.94-9.64) or illicit cocaine (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.50-12.58) and a preoperative diagnosis of back pain (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.63-2.58). No significant differences were observed with various study-level factors, including a comparison of major vs minor surgical procedures (pooled rate: 7.0%; 95% CI, 4.9%-9.9% vs 11.1%; 95% CI, 6.0%-19.4%; P = .20). Across all of our analyses, there was substantial variability because of heterogeneity instead of sampling error. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings suggest that prolonged opioid use after surgery may be a substantial burden to public health. It appears that strategies, such as proactively screening for at-risk individuals, should be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwadolapo D. Lawal
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston
| | - Justin Gold
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston
| | - Amala Murthy
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston
| | - Rupam Ruchi
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Egle Bavry
- Pain Medicine Section, Anesthesiology Service, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Anne L. Hume
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston
- Department of Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Adam K. Lewkowitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence
| | - Todd Brothers
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston
- Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Xuerong Wen
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Michaud JM, Zhang T, Shireman TI, Lee Y, Wilson IB. Hazard of Cervical, Oropharyngeal, and Anal Cancers in HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Medicaid Beneficiaries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:1447-1457. [PMID: 32385117 PMCID: PMC7334054 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human immunodeficiency virus-infected (HIV+) individuals are disproportionately at risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers, but the magnitude of risk estimates varies widely. We conducted a retrospective study using a large U.S.-based cohort to describe the relationship between HIV infection and incident cervical, oropharyngeal, and anal cancers. METHODS Using 2001-2012 U.S. Medicaid data from 14 states, we matched one HIV+ to three HIV-uninfected (HIV-) enrollees on sex, race, state, age, and year, and followed persons for up to 10 years. We developed Cox proportional hazards models comparing HIV+ to HIV- for time to cancer diagnosis adjusted for demographic and comorbidity attributes. RESULTS Our cohorts included 443,592 women for the cervical cancer analysis, and 907,348 and 906,616 persons for the oropharyngeal and anal cancer analyses. The cervical cancer cohort had a mean age of 39 years and was 55% Black. The oropharyngeal and anal cancer cohorts were 50% male, had a mean age of 41 years, and were 51% Black. We estimated the following HRs: cervical cancer, 3.27 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.82-3.80]; oropharyngeal cancer, 1.90 (95% CI, 1.62-2.23; both sexes), 1.69 (95% CI, 1.39-2.04; males), and 2.55 (95% CI, 1.86-3.50; females); and anal cancer, 18.42 (95% CI, 14.65-23.16; both sexes), 20.73 (95% CI, 15.60-27.56; males), and 12.88 (95% CI, 8.69-19.07; females). CONCLUSIONS HIV+ persons were at an elevated risk for HPV-associated cancers, especially anal cancer. IMPACT Medicaid claims data corroborate previous estimates based on registries and clinical cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne M Michaud
- Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
| | - Tingting Zhang
- Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Yoojin Lee
- Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ira B Wilson
- Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Surgeons have played a significant role in the current opioid epidemic through overprescribing practices in the postoperative setting. However, contemporary efforts have helped to decrease opioid excess, particularly in the field of urology. Minimally invasive surgery offers a unique avenue to address overuse of narcotics in the postoperative period given its emphasis on enhanced recovery. RECENT FINDINGS Historically, the majority of the literature characterizing postoperative opioid use and its reduction has focused on non-urological surgery. However, recent studies have shown that patients undergoing urologic procedures are prescribed opioids in a similar manner as patients in other surgical specialties. Reduction strategies have been implemented through the use of regional anesthesia, enhanced recovery after surgery pathways, and the development of procedure-specific opioid prescription recommendations. Patients undergoing urologic surgery experience the same risk of opioid misuse and abuse as patients undergoing other types of surgery. However, the wide use of minimally invasive urological surgeries including robotic surgery offers a unique opportunity to reduce postoperative opioid use through multimodal and interdisciplinary protocols and standardizing guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Serna
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Jordan Medical Education Center, 6th Floor, 3400 Civic Center Blvd., Building 421, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Ruchika Talwar
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel J Lee
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Siglin J, Sorkin JD, Namiranian K. Incidence of Postoperative Opioid Overdose and New Diagnosis of Opioid Use Disorder Among US Veterans. Am J Addict 2020; 29:295-304. [PMID: 32202000 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.13022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Perioperative exposure to opioids is associated with adverse outcomes. We aim to determine the associations between surgery and subsequent opioid overdose, an acute event, and a new diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD), a chronic relapsing disease, in parallel. METHODS This retrospective cohort study of US veterans used surgery as exposure and the two outcomes were (1) occurrence of overdose and (2) new diagnosis of OUD in the first postoperative year. Surgical group was matched to the reference controls based on the propensity score of having surgery, and matched logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS A total of 261 208 surgical patients were matched to 479 531 controls. Overdose occurred in 1893 (0.7%) of the surgical patients and in 518 (0.1%) of the matched controls in the first postoperative year (OR, 6.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.80-7.75; P < .001). Among patients with no history of OUD, surgery was also associated with a new diagnosis of OUD in the first postoperative year (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.24; P = .015). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The postoperative period is strongly associated with opioid overdose, but only weakly associated with new diagnosis of OUD. This is likely due to the difficulty of diagnosing OUD in the postoperative period. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE This is the first study that has examined opioid overdose and new-onset OUD in the postoperative period in parallel. Our analysis suggests different risk factors for each, as well as different strengths of association with surgery. More sensitive diagnostic criteria for postoperative OUD are needed to promptly diagnose and treat this condition. (Am J Addict 2020;00:00-00).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Siglin
- VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland.,School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - John D Sorkin
- VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland.,Baltimore VA Medical Center, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland.,Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Khodadad Namiranian
- VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.,VA Central California Health Care System, Fresno, California
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Malik KM, Imani F, Beckerly R, Chovatiya R. Risk of Opioid Use Disorder from Exposure to Opioids in the Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10:e101339. [PMID: 32337175 PMCID: PMC7158240 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.101339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Opioid use disorder, a major source of morbidity and mortality globally, is regularly linked to opioids given around the time of surgery. Perioperative period, however, is markedly heterogeneous, with the diverse providers using opioids distinctively, and the various drivers of opioid misuse at-play dissimilarly, throughout the perioperative period. The risk of opioid use disorder may, therefore, be different from opioids given at the various phases of perioperative care, and the ensuing recommendations for their use may also be dissimilar. Systematic search and analysis of the pertinent literature, following the accepted standards, showed an overall increased risk of misuse from the perioperative opioids. However, the analyzed studies had significant methodological limitations, and were constrained mainly to the out-patient phase of the perioperative period. Lacking any data, this risk, therefore, is unknown for intraoperative and postoperative recovery periods. Consequently, no firm recommendations can be extended to anesthesia providers generally managing these perioperative stages. Furthermore, with significant methodological limitations, the current recommendations for opioid use after surgery are also arbitrary. Thus, though proposals for perioperative opioid use are formulated in this article, substantive recommendations would require clear delineation of these risks, while avoiding the limitations noted in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid M Malik
- College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA. Tel: +1-3124852938,
| | - Farnad Imani
- Pain Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Corresponding Author: Pain Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Rena Beckerly
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
| | - Rani Chovatiya
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kent ML, Hurley RW, Oderda GM, Gordon DB, Sun E, Mythen M, Miller TE, Shaw AD, Gan TJ, Thacker JKM, McEvoy MD. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative-4 Joint Consensus Statement on Persistent Postoperative Opioid Use: Definition, Incidence, Risk Factors, and Health Care System Initiatives. Anesth Analg 2020; 129:543-552. [PMID: 30897590 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Persistent postoperative opioid use is thought to contribute to the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States. However, efforts to study and address the issue have been stymied by the lack of a standard definition, which has also hampered efforts to measure the incidence of and risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use. The objective of this systematic review is to (1) determine a clinically relevant definition of persistent postoperative opioid use, and (2) characterize its incidence and risk factors for several common surgeries. Our approach leveraged a group of international experts from the Perioperative Quality Initiative-4, a consensus-building conference that included representation from anesthesiology, surgery, and nursing. A search of the medical literature yielded 46 articles addressing persistent postoperative opioid use in adults after arthroplasty, abdominopelvic surgery, spine surgery, thoracic surgery, mastectomy, and thoracic surgery. In opioid-naïve patients, the overall incidence ranged from 2% to 6% based on moderate-level evidence. However, patients who use opioids preoperatively had an incidence of >30%. Preoperative opioid use, depression, factors associated with the diagnosis of substance use disorder, preoperative pain, and tobacco use were reported risk factors. In addition, while anxiety, sex, and psychotropic prescription are associated with persistent postoperative opioid use, these reports are based on lower level evidence. While few articles addressed the health policy or prescriber characteristics that influence persistent postoperative opioid use, efforts to modify prescriber behaviors and health system characteristics are likely to have success in reducing persistent postoperative opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Kent
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert W Hurley
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Gary M Oderda
- College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Debra B Gordon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Eric Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Monty Mythen
- University College London National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy E Miller
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew D Shaw
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tong J Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Julie K M Thacker
- Division of Advanced Oncologic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew D McEvoy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Paravertebral block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. World J Urol 2020; 38:2963-2969. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03093-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
47
|
Opioid prescription use in patients with interstitial cystitis. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 31:1215-1220. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04214-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
48
|
Kidney stones and the opioid epidemic: recent developments and review of the literature. Curr Opin Urol 2019; 30:159-165. [PMID: 31834080 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A public health emergency has been declared in response to rising opioid addiction and opioid-related deaths in the United States. As kidney stones have been identified as an important source of initial and repeated opioid exposures, this review seeks to describe the scope of the problem and report relevant alternatives to opioid analgesia for stones. RECENT FINDINGS Recent literature summarizing the extent of opioid use among those with stones is reviewed. A number of opioid-minimizing strategies and analgesic regimens have been proposed and studied. A review of these modifications and alternatives is provided. SUMMARY Both symptomatic renal colic and surgical interventions to address stones may prompt need for analgesia. Reducing prescribed opioids reduces both patient use and risk of diversion. Modifications in surgical technique, administration of local anesthetics, and use of systemic nonopioid analgesics have all been successfully employed.
Collapse
|
49
|
Namiranian K, Siglin J, Sorkin JD, Norris EJ, Aghevli M, Covington EC. Postoperative opioid misuse in patients with opioid use disorders maintained on opioid agonist treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 2019; 109:8-13. [PMID: 31856954 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients recovering from opioid use disorders (OUD) may be prone to relapse and opioid misuse in the postoperative period due to re-exposure to prescription opioids for pain control. This retrospective study analyzed the incidence of confirmed opioid misuse in the postoperative period in patients with OUDs enrolled in an opioid agonist treatment (OAT) program. METHODS The study population was US veterans with a diagnosis of OUD who enrolled in the OAT program at VA Maryland Health Care System (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2016. The patients were excluded if they were enrolled in OAT for less than a year, or if they had surgery within the first 180 days after OAT admission. The surgical group consisted of veterans who had surgery or an invasive procedure during their enrollment in the OAT program. The control (reference) group consisted of enrolled veterans who did not have any invasive procedure. The primary outcome was the first opioid misuse within 365 days after surgery date in the surgical group or a randomly assigned sham surgery date in controls. Opioid misuse was defined as either inappropriate use of opioids detected via urinalysis or admission with a diagnosis of an opioid overdose. RESULTS From a total of 1352 patients enrolled in the OAT program, 413 were excluded because they were enrolled for less than a year, and 26 were excluded because they had surgery within the first 180 days after admission to the OAT program. Of the 923 eligible patients, 87 had surgery while enrolled and 836 did not. Using propensity scores, all 87 of the surgical cases were matched to 249 of the control cases. In the matched groups, surgery was positively associated with postoperative opioid misuse (odds ratio (OR) of 1.91, 95% CI 1.05-3.48, p = 0.034) in logistic regression. CONCLUSION Among patients with a history of opioid use disorders, the postoperative period was associated with an increased risk of opioid misuse. Moreover, opioid misuse among patients in an opioid agonist treatment program may well be considered a surgical hazard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khodadad Namiranian
- VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| | - Jonathan Siglin
- School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - John David Sorkin
- Baltimore VA Medical Center Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Edward J Norris
- VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Minu Aghevli
- VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Edward C Covington
- Neurological Institute (Emeritus), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Youn B, Shireman TI, Lee Y, Galárraga O, Wilson IB. Trends in medication adherence in HIV patients in the US, 2001 to 2012: an observational cohort study. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22:e25382. [PMID: 31441221 PMCID: PMC6706701 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is essential to reduce HIV-related morbidity and mortality as well as the risk of virological failure and HIV transmission. We determined the trends in ART adherence during the periods of therapeutic advances, wider use of ART and greater attention to ART adherence. To understand the general trends in medication adherence, we compared ART adherence with medications for other common chronic conditions. METHODS A retrospective cohort study using Medicaid claims between 2001 and 2012 from 14 US states with the highest HIV prevalence. Medicaid is the largest source of care for HIV patients in the US. We identified Medicaid beneficiaries with HIV who initiated ART between 2001 and 2010 (n=23,343). Comparison groups included (1) HIV- persons who initiated a statin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB), or metformin and (2) HIV+ persons who initiated these control medications while on and not on ART. We estimated adjusted odds of >90% medication implementation during the two years following initiation. RESULTS The proportion of HIV+ persons with >90% ART implementation increased from 33.5% in those who initiated in 2001 to 46.4% in 2005 and 52.4% in 2010. ART initiators in 2007 to 2010 had 53% increased odds of >90% implementation compared to those in 2001 to 2003 (adjusted OR 1.53, 99% CI: 1.34 to 1.75). Older age, male, White race, newer ART regimens and absence of substance use indicators were also associated with increased odds of >90% ART implementation. No or minimal improvements were found in the implementation of control medications in HIV- persons. For HIV- persons, the adjusted ORs comparing 2007-2010 to 2001-2003 were 1.06, 1.01 and 1.19 for statins, ACEI/ARB, metformin respectively. HIV+ persons who were on ART had, on average, 15.0 (SD: 4.2) and 16.1 (SD: 3.4) percentage points higher >90% implementation rates of concurrent statins, ACEI/ARB or metformin compared to HIV- persons and HIV+ persons who were not on ART respectively. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to ART substantially improved between 2001 and 2012. Nevertheless, the absolute rates of >90% implementation were low for all groups examined. Substantial disparities by age, sex and race were present, drawing attention to the need to continue to enhance medication adherence. Further studies are required to examine whether these trends and disparities persist in the most recent period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bora Youn
- Department of Health Services, Policy & PracticeBrown University School of Public HealthProvidenceRIUSA
| | - Theresa I Shireman
- Department of Health Services, Policy & PracticeBrown University School of Public HealthProvidenceRIUSA
| | - Yoojin Lee
- Department of Health Services, Policy & PracticeBrown University School of Public HealthProvidenceRIUSA
| | - Omar Galárraga
- Department of Health Services, Policy & PracticeBrown University School of Public HealthProvidenceRIUSA
| | - Ira B Wilson
- Department of Health Services, Policy & PracticeBrown University School of Public HealthProvidenceRIUSA
| |
Collapse
|