Linguistic Adaptation, Reliability, Validation, and Responsivity of the Chinese Version of Reflux Symptom Index

Association of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis

ObjectiveThe current study was conducted to explore the association between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (RCRS), and to reveal the potential role of LPRD in the development of RCRS.MethodsA total of 104 patients diagnosed as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and hospitalized, as well as 50 healthy participants were enrolled into this study. Among patients enrolled, 53 were RCRS and 51 were CRS. All participants were assessed with reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS). Patients with RSI >13 and/or RFS >7 were diagnosed as LPRD. In addition, pepsin in the nasal secretions from the middle meatus tract complex at fasting in the morning was analyzed using ELISA. Patients with pepsin concentration of >75 ng/ml was considered as positive, and confirmed as LPRD.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, sex, height, and weight among RCRS, CRS, and control groups. The positive rates of RSI and RFS scores were 39.6% in the RCRS and 52.9% in the CRS, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of the control group (14.0%, P < 0.05), respectively. Significantly higher positive rate of pepsin assay was also observed for RCRS(43.4%) and CRS(64.7%) when compared with the control group (18.0%, P < 0.05). The positive rate of pepsin assay was strongly associated with the positive rate of RSI or RFS (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe present findings have important implications that RSI and RFS score was highly associated with pepsin assay result in the patients with RCRS or CRS. We confirmed the importance of RSI and RFS scoring system as well as pepsin test, which may offer insight for clinical screening for LPRD among CRS patients.

The influence of saliva pepsin concentration on subjective severity of seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUNDS

Some studies believe that there is a correlation between larygopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and allergic rhinitis (AR). Salivary pepsin concentration (SPC) test is a gradually accepted objective examination method for LPRD in recent years.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of coexisting LPRD on subjective severity of seasonal AR and the potential role of pepsin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adult patients with seasonal AR were prospectively enrolled. Subjective severity of AR was assessed using the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Potential LPRD was assessed using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and SPC measurements.

RESULTS

No significant correlation was found between the RSI value and the TNSS and VAS values (both p > .05). In contrast, the SPC value was found to be significantly associated with both of TNSS and VAS values (p < .05). Among the symptoms included in the TNSS, the SPC value was significantly and positively associated with nasal congestion and runny nose (both p < .05), but not with sneezing and nasal itching (both p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Coexisting LPRD may aggravates seasonal AR symptoms. SPC could be used to examine whether AR patients have combined LPRD and to determine the necessity of anti-reflux treatment.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Clinic: An Epidemiological Survey

Background and Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) has been implicated in the etiology of many laryngeal disorders and is also closely related to the occurrence and progression of a variety of throat diseases, including chronic cough, leukoplakia of the larynx, dysphonia, and even laryngeal tumors. LPRD can significantly reduce the quality of life of patients and cause substantial medical and economic burdens to the society. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), a self-administered 9-item outcomes instrument for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), has been widely used to screen for LPRD, but there is a lack of feasibility studies on the use of RSI for LPRD screening and alternative diagnostic tools in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) clinics. To study the incidence, clinical characteristics, diagnostic status, and influencing factors of LPRD at OHNS clinics, RSI as an alternative diagnostic tool has also been studied. LPRD was defined as RSI > 13. Methods: Systematic collection of data by the RSI questionnaire was used to identify patients in the outpatient clinic suffering from LPRD; in addition, the personal history of participants was collected. Follow-up observation was carried out for 6 months for patients with suspected LPRD (RSI > 13), including whether they were treated with standardized anti-reflux therapy, and the questionnaire based on RSI was completed again after treatment. Results: The LPRD rate was 7.92% (94/1187) in this survey. The proportions of LPRD patients with smoking history (vs no smoking) and alcohol consumption history (vs. no alcohol consumption) were significantly higher (χ2 values: 7.025 and 4.562, and P values: .008 and .033; respectively). Smoking significantly increased the risk of LPRD (OR: 2.140, 95% CI: 1.058-4.331, P = .034). Among patients with LPRD positive, the incidence of "foreign body sensation in the throat" (symptom 8) score equal to 5 was the highest (19.15%). The severity of "excess mucus in the throat or postnasal drip" (symptom 3) contributed mostly to the total RSI score in patients with LPRD (r = .409, P < .001). ROC curve analysis showed that RSI ≥ 14 had a sensitivity of 72.9% and a specificity of 71.4% for the diagnosis of LPRD, with AUC = 0.797 (95% CI: 0.577-0.884, P < .001). Conclusions: The incidence of LPRD was high in patients we examined in OHNS clinics. We recommend that RSI can be used by otolaryngologists as a reliable tool for screening and diagnosing LPRD in OHNS clinics, which is beneficial for clinical practice.

Risk Factor-Related Lifestyle Habits of Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

OBJECTIVE

The role of lifestyle habits in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is comparatively underexplored. We aim to examine the specific lifestyle habits in patients with LPRD.

METHODS

Systematic sampling was applied to select respondents aged 18 through 80 years in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) clinics in Nan Fang Hospital during August 2017-July 2018, 1658 eligible participants were included by a systematic sampling method. Subjects with RSI score>13 were considered as LPRD patients. The risk of reflux symptoms was estimated and multivariate calculated as odds ratios in relation to exposure to tobacco smoking, alcohol, coffee, tea, carbonated drinks, chocolate, spicy food, night sleep time, dinner-to-bed time, subjective sleep quality, and physical exercise.

RESULTS

There was a significant dose-response association between carbonated beverage and LPRD. Among people who had drinking carbonated drinks the odds ratio was 1.76 (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.24-2.50, P = .002) compared with non-carbonated drinker. A similar positive association was found for poor subjective sleep quality and shorter night sleeping time, the odds ratio for reflux was 1.58 (95% CI 1.14 to 2.18) among those who always have poor subjective sleep quality compared with those whose have good subjective sleep quality. The odds ratio for reflux was 2.29 (95% CI 1.23-4.28, P = .015) among those who always sleep 3-5 hours every night compared with those who sleep more than 8 hours every night. Beyond that, we found high BMI may have a negative correlation with LPRD, the odds ratio for reflux was .61 (95% CI 0.39 to .95, P = .054) among those whose BMI >25 kg/m2 compared with those BMI ≤ 20 kg/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LPRD may have certain lifestyle habits, avoid carbonated beverage, poor subjective sleep quality, and lack of sleep should be advised in treatment of LPRD.

The Revised Reflux Symptom Index (R-RSI): Development, Internal and External Validation Study

INTRODUCTION

This study proposes a revised version of the Reflux Symptom Index (R-RSI), a seventeen-item questionnaire that was revised to increase the suspicion of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

METHODS

Internal validation involved 213 participants, comprising 160 subjects without a previous LPRD diagnosis and 53 subjects with a self-reported previous diagnosis of LPRD with or without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were calculated. For the external validation, 56 patients (independent from the previous cohort) were enrolled to explore the R-RSI screening properties and determine a cutoff using 24-h MII-pH as the gold standard.

RESULTS

R-RSI test-retest reliability was high, both for the total score (ICC: 0.970) and for each item (ranging from 0.876 to 0.980). Cronbach's alpha was 0.910, indicating excellent internal consistency of the questionnaire. Participants with a previous self-reported diagnosis scored significantly higher (mean 24.94 ± 7.4; median 26, IQR 20-29) than those without a previous diagnosis (mean 4.66 ± 5.3; median 4, IQR 1-6) (p value <0.0001). Participants with both previous LPRD and GERD diagnoses had higher scores (27.20 ± 7.8) compared to those with only LPRD (21.77 ± 5.5) (p value = 0.003). Using 24-h MII-pH diagnosis as a gold standard, the optimal R-RSI cutoff point was determined to be 18, with a sensitivity of 84.5% and a specificity of 81.8%, positive predictive value of 95%, and negative predictive value of 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the R-RSI may be useful to suspect LPRD, with or without GERD. The R-RSI is a self-administered patient-reported outcome questionnaire that demonstrates excellent reliability and high screening properties. Employing a cutoff of ≥18 in the R-RSI can assist in diagnosing and monitoring LPRD.

Adaptation and Validation of Reflux Symptom Index into Hindi Language (RSI-H®)

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Reflux Symptomatic Index in the Hindi language. Secondly, we aimed to compare its outcomes between normal individuals and people suffering from laryngopharyngeal reflux.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study design.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The original Reflux Symptom Index was translated into Hindi language using the forward-backward translation method. A total of 192 participants were included in the study. Among 192 participants, 57 were healthy controls, and 135 were individuals with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and clinical validity were measured.

RESULTS

The majority of the population reported the presence of globus sensation. Results revealed that the Hindi version of the Reflux Symptom Index exhibited an excellent internal consistency (ie, 0.829). A significant difference was found between the mean scores of both groups, and the excellent test-retest reliability score (ie, 0.94 & 0.96) was obtained.

CONCLUSION

We can conclude that the Hindi version of the Reflux Symptom Index exhibited a similar psychometric functional property as the Original version of the Reflux Symptom Index. So, the developed tool is a quick, reliable, and valid tool to assess laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Translation and validation of the Korean Version of the Reflux Symptom Score

OBJECTIVES

To assess the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the reflux symptom score (K-RSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The English version of the RSS was translated into Korean and completed by 77 people (44 and 33 people in the patient group and control group, respectively). They completed the K-RSS (K-RSS-1) and reflux symptom index (RSI) questionnaires and answered questions about age, sex, underlying disease, smoking history, and alcohol and coffee consumption. They completed the K-RSS once more (K-RSS-2) after 1 - 2 weeks. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). External validity was evaluated using the Spearman rank test between the RSI and K-RSS. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess internal validity by comparing the K-RSS-1 scores between the patient and control groups.

RESULTS

The most common symptoms were globus sensation, throat clearing, and throat pain. The K-RSS reported high internal consistency (α = 0.894). The ICC for the total score was 0.883, indicating excellent test-retest reliability. According to the Spearman analysis, there was a significant correlation between the total score of the K-RSS and that of the RSI (rs = 0.902; P < 0.001), demonstrating strong external validity. Furthermore, the patient group showed significantly higher values than the control group in all K-RSS scores, suggesting high internal validity.

CONCLUSION

The K-RSS is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire with excellent criterion-referenced validity and ideal reliability.

Characteristics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients of Different Genders and Ages

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the differences in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) characteristics between gender and age groups based on the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS) scale and 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (HEMII-pH) monitoring.

METHODS

The enrolled were patients with LPR symptoms completed the 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring and divided into two gender groups (male and female) and elderly group (>60 years), middle-aged group (41-60 years) and young group (18-40 years). The total RSI and RFS scores of individuals were counted. Various potential differences as well as incidence of each type of LPR events between gender and age groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 420 patients were included, with 333 (79.3%) diagnosed with LPR confirmed by 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring. Females (n=49) had a statistically higher LPR positivity (91.0% vs. 76.6%, P < 0.01) than males (n=342). Female patients with LPR had significantly higher RSI scores (14.08 ± 6.72 vs. 11.08 ± 4.82, P < 0.001) than male patients. The positive rate of LPR were 82.6%, 80.7% and 63.3% in the elderly, middle-aged and young groups. The Elderly group had significantly lower RSI scores (10.20 ± 4.06 vs. 12.80 ± 6.58, 12.24 ± 5.57, P < 0.001) but higher RFS scores (9.37 ± 3.25 vs. 8.16 ± 3.34, 8.57 ± 2.58, P < 0.05) than the other two groups. The number of acid hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) and distal esophageal acid reflux were significantly higher in elderly than in young patients. Except for non-acid gas HREs, the positive rates of other types of HREs were increasing from young to middle-aged to the elderly group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients with suspected LPR symptoms had a higher positive rate of LPR and RSI score than males. The prevalence of LPR and the number of acid reflux were progressively increasing with age, but the perception of reflux symptoms may diminish.

Awareness about laryngopharyngeal reflux disease among Chinese otolaryngologists: a nationwide survey

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the status of the current knowledge about laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) among Chinese otolaryngologists.

DESIGN

Multi-centre cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

220 medical centres in different regions of China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2254 otolaryngologists from 220 medical centres in China who were successfully on-site surveyed between November 2019 and December 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Awareness about LPRD included knowledge about risk factors, symptoms, laryngoscope signs, related diseases, current diagnostic methods and treatments.

RESULTS

The percentage of participants who had heard of LPRD was 96.4%, with academic conferences as the most common source of information (73.3%). The most commonly known risk factor, symptom, laryngoscope sign, related disease, diagnostic method and treatment were alcohol consumption (44.0%), pharyngeal foreign body sensation (66.9%), hyperaemia (52.4%), pharyngolaryngitis (54.8%), pH monitoring (47.6%) and medication (82.1%), respectively. Only 28.3% of all participants knew that 24 h pH or multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring was the most accurate diagnostic test. As many as 73.1% of all participants knew that proton pump inhibitors were the first-line treatment drugs. An analysis of the overall status of awareness using a scoring system suggested that otolaryngologists were better aware owing to more access, working at 3A hospitals, and postgraduate or above educational background (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although the majority of Chinese otolaryngologists had heard of LPRD, their overall awareness about the disease was not encouraging. More efforts are needed to increase the knowledge about LPRD among this group of physicians.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900025581.

An epidemiological survey of gastroesophageal reflux disease at the digestive endoscopy center in Guangzhou

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the detection rates, common symptoms and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) at the digestive endoscopy center.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional survey conducted at three hospitals and a total of 565 eligible participants were enrolled. All the patients completed routine ENT examination, gastroscopy, gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire (GerdQ), reflux symptom index (RSI) and a self-designed 25-item symptoms table survey.

RESULTS

Among the 565 eligible participants, the detection rates of GERD and LPRD were 18.41% (104/565) and 9.91% (56/565), respectively. The detection rate of GERD combined with LPRD was 3.19% (18/565). Among GERD and LPRD patients, males (vs. females), middle-aged and elderly patients (vs. young people), BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m² (vs. BMI < 24.0 kg/m²), with current smoking history (vs. no smoking), and current drinking history (vs. no drinking), lying down immediately after meal (vs. no lying down immediately after meal) were significantly higher (all p < 0.05). The most common extraesophageal symptoms in patients with GERD were dry mouth (66.35%), globus sensation (56.73%), dry throat and pharyngeal itching (55.77%). The most common extraesophageal symptoms in patients with LPRD were globus sensation (91.07%), dry throat and pharyngeal itching (83.93%), and dry mouth (82.14%).

CONCLUSION

GERD and LPRD had a high detection rate at the digestive endoscopy center in Guangzhou, China. Older age, BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m², smoking and drinking history were risk factors for both GERD and LPRD. Neither GerdQ nor RSI scores included common extraesophageal symptoms.

Adaptation and Validation of Reflux Symptom Index Into Kannada Language

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to translate, validate the Reflux Symptom Index in Kannada language and to compare its outcomes between normal individuals and individuals with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross sectional study design MATERIALS AND METHOD: : The English version of Reflux Symptom Index was translated into Kannada language using standard procedures. A total of 162 participants participated in the study, 81 with laryngopharyngeal reflux and 81 controls. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and clinical validity were calculated.

RESULTS

Results revealed that the Kannada Reflux Symptom Index exhibited an excellent internal consistency (α = 0.87). The average intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.90 and 0.92, indicating excellent test-retest reliability. Independent sample t test revealed a statistically significant difference between the total scores of both the groups, thereby exhibiting good clinical validity of RSI-K (t = 42.71, df = 158, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Kannada Reflux Symptom Index is a reliable and valid tool for use in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. It can be used as a quick tool to assess laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Linguistic Adaptation, Reliability, and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Reflux Symptom Index

INTRODUCTION

The reflux symptom index (RSI) has been designed to raise the clinical suspicion of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients presenting with ear, nose, and throat symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a Turkish version of the RSI (Tr-RSI) and to evaluate its internal consistency, reliability, and clinical validity METHODS: The RSI was translated into Turkish. A total of 44 asymptomatic control subjects without LPR and 62 patients with LPR were enrolled into this study. The patients were treated with diet and behavioral modifications combined with 20 mg of rabeprazole twice daily for 3 months. All individuals were asked to fill the Tr-RSI. Participants in the control group were asked to refill the Tr-RSI after 1 week, whereas those in the patient group after treatment. Test-retest reliability, validity, and internal consistency were computed.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha value of Tr-RSI was 0.959, indicating excellent internal consistency. The single-measurement intra-class correlation coefficient absolute agreement was 0.948 (with 95% confidence interval of 0.907-0.971), indicating good test-retest reliability. The Tr-RSI scores for total and each item were significantly higher in the LPR patient group than in the control group (P < 0.001). In the LPR patient group, the posttreatment Tr-RSI scores for each item and total were significantly lower than the pretreatment scores (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Tr-RSI was successfully created. It can be used with strong internal consistency, high test-retest reliability, and optimal clinical validity.

Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Evaluation of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Scale: Psychometric Properties using Optimal Scaling Techniques

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the psychometric properties of the reflux symptom index (RSI) as short screening approach for the diagnostic of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with confirmed diagnosed regarding the 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH).

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2018, 56 patients with LPR symptoms and 71 healthy individuals (control group) were prospectively enrolled. The LPR diagnosis was confirmed through MII-pH results. All subjects (n = 127) fulfilled RSI and the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) was performed through flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. The sensitivity and the specificity of RSI was assessed by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15 LPR patients (26.8%) of the clinical group met MII-pH diagnostic criteria. Among subjects classified as positive for MII- pH diagnoses, RSI and RFS mean scores were respectively 20 (SD ± 10.5) and 7.1 (SD ± 2.5), values not significantly different compared to the negative MII-pH group. The metric analysis of the items led to the realization of a binary recoding of the score. Both versions had similar psychometric properties, α was 0.840 for RSI original version and 0.836 for RSI binary version. High and comparable area under curve (AUC) values indicate a good ability of both scales to discriminate between individuals with and without LPR pathology diagnosis. Based on balanced sensitivity and specificity, the optimal cut-off scores for LPR pathology were ≥ 5 for RSI binary version and ≥ 15 for RSI original version. Both version overestimated LPR prevalence. The original version had more sensitivity and the RSI Binary version had more specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

It would be necessary to think about modifying the original RSI in order to improve its sensitivity and specificity (RSI binary version, adding or changing some items), or to introduce new scores in order to better frame the probably affected of LPR patient.

An epidemiological survey of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease at the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics in China

PURPOSE

Using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), this nationwide study aimed to investigate the incidence, diagnostic status, risk factors, and common symptoms of adult laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) at otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) clinics in China.

METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional survey began at the different institutions ranged from July to October 2017, and the duration was 12 months. A total of 90,440 eligible patients were finally enrolled from 72 medical institutions in China. All these patients completed the questionnaire based on RSI. In this study, LPRD was defined as RSI > 13.

RESULTS

There were 9182 with LPRD among the 90,440 eligible participants (10.15%). However, only 1294 had a history of LPRD diagnosis among those with LPRD (14.09%). There were regional differences in the frequency of LPRD (P < 0.001). The proportions of patients with LPRD in males (vs. females), middle- and old-aged patients (vs. young), with current smoking history (vs. no smoking), and current drinking history (vs. no drinking) were significantly higher (all P < 0.001). Middle and old age, current smoking, and drinking history were independent predictors of LPRD (all P < 0.001, OR 1.240, 1.261, and 1.481, respectively). "Sensations of something stuck in throat or a lump in throat", "clearing throat", and "excess throat mucus or postnasal drip" were the most frequent clinical symptoms in patients with LPRD.

CONCLUSIONS

LPRD has a high incidence at the OHNS clinics in China. However, the diagnostic status of this disease is not optimistic. Older age, smoking, and drinking history were risk factors for LPRD.

Knowledge of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease among otolaryngologists in 3A hospitals in Beijing

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate knowledge of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) among otolaryngologists in 3A hospitals in Beijing.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of LPRD knowledge was conducted with otolaryngologists in 40 3A hospitals in Beijing. A response rate of <80% was obtained from one hospital, so data from 331 valid questionnaires from the other 39 hospitals were analysed.

RESULTS

The most common source of LPRD knowledge was academic lectures (80.1%). The most commonly known risk factors, symptoms, clinical signs and associated diseases were unhealthy eating habits (49.2%), foreign body sensation in the pharynx (71.0%), hyperaemia (42.3%) and pharyngolaryngitis (63.7%), respectively. Only 57.7% of otolaryngologists knew about 24-hour pH monitoring as a gold standard diagnostic test for LPRD. The most commonly known treatment option was medication (93.1%). Most physicians (86.7%) had made a clinical diagnosis of LPRD; however, only 59.9% of them had followed up the treatment outcomes. The most common treatment provided was medication (82.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of LPRD among otolaryngologists in 3A hospitals in Beijing was insufficient. Educational programs are needed to increase the knowledge of LPRD among otolaryngologists.

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Reproducibility of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Reflux Symptom Index

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux is controversial. There is currently no gold standard, so it relies mainly on suspicious clinical symptoms and videolaryngoscopic findings. Unfortunately these signs and symptoms are common to other causes of chronic laryngitis. Scoring systems have been proposed to reduce subjectivity in clinical diagnosis. The most widely used and accepted is the Reflux Symptom Index, which has already been translated into over 10 other languages.

OBJECTIVE

Study the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Reflux Symptom Index (Índice de Sintomas de Refluxo - ISR).

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four adults, 88 with laryngopharyngeal reflux and 66 healthy controls, were studied over a 6-month period, responding to the ISR after thoroughly investigated on possible other causes of chronic laryngitis and the presence of gastroesophageal disease. Test and retest reliability was addressed by reapplying the score to a random subgroup of 101 subjects.

RESULTS

The ISR of subjects was significantly higher than that of controls (Student t test for independent samples, P < 0.001). The ISR also showed high temporal stability and reproducibility (ICC of 0.988 with a confidence interval of 0.982-0.992). The ISR at a cutoff of 13 points presented a sensitivity of 78.4%, a specificity of 95.4%, a false negative of 4.55%, a false positive of 21.59%, a positive predictive value of 95.83%, and a negative predictive value of 86.93%.

CONCLUSION

The ISR proved to be a valid and reliable diagnostic tool.

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Reflux Symptom Index

OBJECTIVE

To validate and assess reliability of the Turkish Reflux Symptom Index (T-RSI).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional case-control study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Turkish version of the original American English RSI was developed. One hundred thirty-two patients with a Reflux Finding Score (RFS) > 7, and 162 healthy controls (HC) with RFS ≤7 were included in the study. To assess reliability, the T-RSI was scored twice, within a 7-14 day window. For construct validity, the scores obtained in the study group were compared to the scores from the HC group. A correlation between RSI and RFS was assessed to determine content validity. Finally, sensitivity and specificity of the index was calculated using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

The T-RSI showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach`s α = 0.912). Item-total correlation coefficients ranged between 0.572 and 0.773. The Pearson product-moment correlation test indicated that the T-RSI is a reliable tool (r = 0.931, n = 107, P < 0.001). There were significant difference between the study group and the HC group for the mean RSI scores (18.15 ± 7.31 and 7.88 ± 5.32, P < 0.001 respectively). The mean RFS score in the patients was 12.57 and the correlation between RFS score and RSI score was high (r = 0.704). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis the area under curve of the T-RSI was 0.892. The optimal cut-off value was 12.5 with a sensitivity of 82.6% and a specificity of 84.6%.

CONCLUSION

The T-RSI is an easily administered, reliable, and valid instrument for assessing symptoms thought to be related to laryngopharyngeal reflux. A score of T-RSI greater than 12.5 is similar to an RSI score of >13 considered symptomatic for laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Diagnosis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Using the Pepsin Salivary Test

Background: To investigate the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) employing the salivary pepsin concentration method. To compare the results of pepsin concentration with the severity of the pathology. Methods: Seventy-five OSA patients (44 males, 31 females) were enrolled in the study. For each patient, the AHI (apnea–hypopnea index) and the BMI (body mass index) were initially evaluated. All the patients enrolled were assessed using the reflux symptom index (RSI) and the reflux finding score (RFS) in order to perform a clinical diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. In all patients a salivary sample was taken to estimate the presence of pepsin and its concentration. Results: The incidence of LPR (laryngopharyngeal reflux) in OSA patients, evaluated using the salivary pepsin concentration test (PEP-test), was found to be 32% of cases. Linear regression testing did not show any correlation between AHI and pepsin concentration in salivary samples (p = 0.1). Conclusion: A high number of patients with OSA seem to show positivity for salivary pepsin, correlated to an LPR. There does not appear to be a correlation between the severity of apnea and the grade of salivary pepsin reflux. On the other hand, direct correlation between BMI and the value of pepsin in salivary specimens was observed.

Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom score

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To develop and validate the Reflux Symptom Score (RSS), a self-administered patient-reported outcome questionnaire for patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective controlled study.

METHODS

A total of 113 patients with LPR were enrolled and treated with diet and 3 months of pantoprazole, alginate, and/or magaldrate depending on the LPR characteristics (acid, nonacid, or mixed). Eighty asymptomatic individuals completed the study. Patients and controls completed the RSS twice within a 7-day period to assess test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α for the RSS items in patients and controls. Validity was assessed by comparing the baseline RSS with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Seventy-seven patients completed the RSS at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment to assess responsiveness to change. The RSS cutoff for determining the presence and absence of LPR was examined by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability (r_s = 0.921) and internal consistency reliability (α = 0.969) were high. RSS exhibited high external validity indicated by a significant correlation with the RSI (r_s = 0.831). Internal validity was excellent based on the higher RSS in patients compared with controls (P = .001). RSS, RSI, and VHI scores significantly improved from pre- to posttreatment, indicating a high responsiveness to change. RSS >13 can be considered suggestive of LPR-related symptoms. RSS was not influenced by the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, LPR subtypes, or patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

RSS is a self-administered patient-reported outcome questionnaire that demonstrates high reliability and excellent criterion-based validity. RSS can be used in diagnosing and monitoring LPR disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b Laryngoscope, 130:E98-E107, 2020.

Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature on LPR epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment was conducted. Using the PRISMA statement, 3 authors selected relevant publications to provide a critical analysis of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The important heterogeneity across studies in LPR diagnosis continues to make it difficult to summarize a single body of thought. Controversies persist concerning epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. No recent epidemiologic study exists regarding prevalence and incidence with the use of objective diagnostic tools. There is no survey that evaluates the prevalence of symptoms and signs on a large number of patients with confirmed LPR. Regarding diagnosis, an increasing number of authors used multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, although there is no consensus regarding standardization of the diagnostic criteria. The efficiency of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy remains poorly demonstrated and misevaluated by incomplete clinical tools that do not take into consideration many symptoms and extralaryngeal findings. Despite the recent advances in knowledge about nonacid LPR, treatment protocols based on PPIs do not seem to have evolved.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The development of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and pepsin and bile salt detection should be considered for the establishment of a multiparameter diagnostic approach. LPR treatment should evolve to a more personalized regimen, including diet, PPIs, alginate, and magaldrate according to individual patient characteristics. Multicenter international studies with a standardized protocol could improve scientific knowledge about LPR.