Intermediate-term EVAR outcomes in octogenarians

The Safety and Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) increases with age. Previous trials confirm that elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an effective intervention for AAA. However, few elderly patients were recruited into randomized trials, whereas in contemporary clinical practice, elective repair is commonly performed on octogenarians. We evaluated the safety and outcome of elective EVAR in elderly patients to inform clinical practice and vascular service provision.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting risk of complications and death in patients undergoing elective EVAR was performed (PROSPERO CRD: 42022308423). Observational studies and interventional arms of randomized trials were included if the outcome rates or raw data were provided. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were longer-term mortality, 30-day major adverse events, and aneurysm-related mortality. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between octogenarians and non-octogenarians. Exclusion criteria were emergency procedures, non-infrarenal aneurysms, and lack of octogenarian data.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies were eligible from 10 099 citations, including 10 national and 5 international registries, 26 retrospective studies, and our own prospective cohort. The analysis included 208 997 non-octogenarians (mean age=70.19 [SD=0.62]) and 106 188 octogenarians (mean age=83.75 [SD=0.35]). The 30-day mortality post-elective EVAR was higher in octogenarians (1.08% in non-octogenarians, 2.31% in octogenarians, odds ratio [OR]=2.27 [2.08-2.47], p<0.0001). Linear regression demonstrated a 0.83% increase in 30-day mortality for every 10-year age increase above 60 years old. Mortality for octogenarians increased significantly during follow-up: 11.35% (OR=1.87 [1.65-2.13], p<0.001), 22.80% (OR=1.89 [1.52-2.35], p<0.001), 32.00% (OR=1.98 [1.66-2.37], p<0.001), 47.53%, and 51.08% (OR=2.40 [1.90-3.03], p<0.001) at 1-through-5-year follow-up, respectively. The 30-day major adverse events after elective EVAR were higher in octogenarians (OR=1.75-2.83, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarians experience higher but acceptable peri-operative morbidity and mortality compared with younger patients. However, 3-year to 5-year survival is very low among octogenarians. Our findings challenge the notion of routine intervention in elderly patients and support very careful selection for elective EVAR. Many octogenarians with peri-threshold (<6 cm) AAAs may derive no benefit from EVAR due to limited 3-year to 5-year overall survival and low risk of aneurysm rupture with conservative management. An adjusted threshold for intervention in octogenarians may be warranted.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Octogenarians with infra-renal AAA are increasingly managed with elective EVAR. Previous studies have demonstrated that EVAR is safer than open repair for octogenarians, with lower peri-operative mortality and major adverse events. However, randomised trials, on which much of contemporary evidence is based, recruited a relatively younger population of participants. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a contemporary synthesis of the literature comparing outcomes in octogenarians to younger patients. The results of this analysis, together with low rupture rates amongst octogenarians in existing literature, question the benefit of routine elective intervention for peri-threshold aneurysms and an adjusted threshold for intervention in octogenarians may be warranted.

Preoperative risk score for mortality within 3 years of visceral segment fenestrated endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to create a risk score for the event of mortality within 3 years of complex fenestrated visceral segment endovascular aortic repair utilizing variables existing at the time of preoperative presentation.

METHODS

After exclusions, 1916 patients were identified in the Vascular Quality Initiative who were included in the analysis. The first step in development of the risk score was univariable analysis for the primary outcome of mortality within 3 years of surgery. χ2 analysis was performed for categorical variables, and comparison of means with independent Student t-test was performed for ordinal variables. Variables that achieved a univariable P value less than 0.1 were then placed into Cox regression multivariable time dependent analysis for the development of mortality within 3 years. Variables that achieved a multivariable significance of less than 0.1 were utilized for the risk score, with point weighting based on the beta-coefficient. Variables with a beta coefficient of 0.25 to 0.49 were assigned 1 point, 0.5 to 0.74 2 points, 0.75 to 0.99 3 points, and 1.0 to 1.25 4 points. A cumulative score for each patient was then summed, the percentage of patients at each score experiencing mortality within 3 weeks was then calculated, and a comparison of score outcomes was conducted with binary logistic regression. Area under the curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The primary outcome of mortality within 3 years of surgery occurred in 12.8% of patients (245/1916). The mean age for the study population was 73.35 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.26 years). The mean maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter was 60.43 mm (SD, 10.52 mm). The mean number of visceral vessels stented was 3.3 (SD, 0.76). Variables present at the time of surgery that were included in the risk score were: hemodialysis (3 points); age >87, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, AAA diameter >77 mm (all 2 points); and body mass index <20 kg/m2, female sex, congestive heart failure, active smoking, chronic renal insufficiency, age 80 to 87 years, and AAA diameter 67 to 77 mm (all 1 point). BMI >30 kg/m2 (mean, 34.46 kg/m2) and age <67 years were protective (-1 point). Testing the model resulted in an area under the curve of 0.706. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test for logistic regression utilizing the 15 different risk score total groups revealed a model predictive accuracy of 87.3%. Significant escalations in 3-year mortality were noted to occur at scores of 6 and greater. Mean AAA diameter was significantly larger for patients who had higher risk scores (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel risk score for mortality within 3 years of fenestrated visceral segment aortic endograft has been developed that has excellent accuracy in predicting which patients will survive and derive the strongest benefit from intervention. This facilitates risk-benefit analysis and counseling of patients and families with realistic long-term expectations. This potentially enhances patient-centered decision-making.

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM IN PATIENTS OVER 80 YEARS. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOME ASPECTS ACCORDING TO THE DATA OF RYAZAN (RUSSIA) AND DUSHANBE (TAJIKISTAN)

Highlights

No studies have been published comparing the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in residents of the Central Asian region and Russia ≥80 years of age. Differences in the number of emergency and planned operations in the studied countries have been revealed. Thus, despite the predominance of planned operations in the total structure, the frequency of emergency operations related to AAA rupture is extremely high, which is associated with a large aneurysm diameter. In Tajikistan there is no difference in mortality between patients of different age groups, while in the Russian Federation this indicator is higher among persons up to and including 79 years of age. The number of comorbidities is high in both countries.

 

Abstract

Aim. To analyse the demography, the structure of comorbidity and mortality in the treatment of patients with AAA with an age priority of study up to 79 and over 80 years old in Russia and Tajikistan.

Methods. A retrospective, comparative study of patients with infrarenal AAA who underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EAAA) or open AAA reconstruction during the period from 2011 to 2015 at the clinic of Russian State Medical University named after N.N. acad. I.P. Pavlov in Ryazan, Russia and in the RSCCS, Dushanbe, Tajikistan (2011–2017). The study included 226 patients, 60 from Dushanbe (Tajikistan) and 166 from Ryazan (Russia). The study examined age, gender, comorbidities: diabetes, coronary heart disease (CHD), hypertension, COPD, smoking, as well as abdominal aortic diameter and 30-day mortality.

Results. There are significantly more male patients with AAA in both countries. The number of comorbidities (CHD, hypertension, COPD, diabetes) per patient reaches 2.30 in Russia and 2.35 in Tajikistan. The number of patients older than 80 years in Russia was 11.4% and in Tajikistan 23.7% of the total number of patients operated on for AAA. In all countries, patients with AAA, inclusive, up to 79 years of age are statistically significantly more than patients 80 years of age or older. There are statistically significantly more patients under 79 in Russia. The age of patients after 80 is statistically significantly higher among patients from Russia. The number of emergency operations in all countries is significantly lower than elective operations, but still emergency operations were performed in almost one third of cases. In the group of patients up to 79 years old, the smallest number of emergency operations due to aneurysm ruptures was found in Russia. In the group of patients aged 80 years old and over, the smallest number of elective surgeries was found in Russia. The AAA diameter in patients from the two countries did not differ statistically significantly and amounted to 60.0 [48.0; 75.0] and 57.0 [54.0; 61.5] mm. in RF and RT, respectively (p > 0.05). In the age category up to 79 years old, there were statistically significantly fewer men in Tajikistan than in Russia. However, in the category after 80 years old there are statistically significantly fewer men in Russia than in Tajikistan. In Tajikistan, there was no difference in mortality between ages, however, in the Russian Federation it is higher in patients up to 79 years of age inclusive.

Conclusion. As the results of the study showed, the average age of all patients with AAA was elderly, and the number of patients older than 80 years was 11.4% and 23.4% in Russia and Tajikistan, respectively. The group of patients over 80 years of age, according to the criterion of average age, was older among patients from Russia. It is important that the number of emergency operations in all countries is significantly lower than planned, but emergency operations were performed in almost one third of cases. In addition, the number of high-risk comorbidities is high in both countries.

Outcomes of EVAR Conversion in Octogenarians Treated at a High-Volume Aorta Center

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair(EVAR) is the dominant treatment strategy for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms(AAA) but is especially preferred among octogenarian(age ≥80-years) patients due to concerns surrounding comorbidity severity and physiological frailty. Correspondingly, EVAR failure resulting in subsequent open conversion(EVAR-c) has been increasingly reported in older patients but there is a paucity of literature focusing on outcomes in this subgroup. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate our experience with EVAR-c in octogenarians(≥80-years) compared to younger patients(age <80-years).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all non-mycotic EVAR-c procedures(2002-2020) at a single high-volume academic hospital with a dedicated aorta center(https://www.uf-health-aortic-disease-center) was performed. Patients(n=162) were categorized into octogenarian(age ≥80; n=43) and non-octogenarian(age<80; n=119) cohorts and subsequently compared. The primary end-point was 30-day mortality. Secondary end-points included complications, 90-day mortality, and overall survival. Cox regression determined effects of selected covariates on mortality risk. Kaplan-Meier methodology estimated survival.

RESULTS

No difference in pre-admission EVAR re-intervention rates was present(octogenerians-42% vs. non-octogenerians-43%;p=1) although time to first re-intervention was greater in octogenarians(41 vs. non-octogenarians, 15-months;p=.01). Concordantly, time to EVAR-c was significantly longer among octogenarian patients(61 vs. non-octogenarians, 39-months;p<.01). No difference in rupture presentation was evident(14% vs. 10%;p=.6); however, elective EVAR-c occurred less frequently(octogenerians-42% vs. non-octogenerians-59%;p=.07). AAA diameter was significantly larger for elective octogenarian EVAR-c(7.8±1.9cm vs. non-octogenarians, 7.0±1.5cm;p=.02) and type 1a endoleak was the most common indication overall(58%;n=91). Among all presentations, a trend in higher 30-day mortality was evident for octogenarian patients(16% vs. non-octogenarians, 7%;p=.06). Similarly 90-day mortality was greater among octogenarians(26% vs. non-octogenarians, 10%;p=.02). However, incidence of any complication(56% vs. 49%;p=.5), readmission(12% vs. 6%;p=.3), unplanned re-operation(10% vs. 5%;p=.5) and LOS(11 vs. 9 days;p=.3) was not significantly different. Age ≥80 was predictive of short-term mortality after non-elective but not elective cases; however, increasing comorbidity number, non-elective admission and renal/mesenteric revascularization had the strongest association with mortality risk. One- and three-year survival was not different between groups when comparing all patients after the first 90-days postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Although higher unadjusted peri-operative mortality occurred among octogenarian patients, risk-adjusted elective outcomes were comparable to younger EVAR-c subjects when treated at a high-volume aortic surgery center. This underscores the importance of appropriate patient selection and modulation of operative complexity when feasible to achieve optimal results. Providers caring for octogenarian patients with EVAR failure should consider timely elective referral to high-volume aorta centers to reduce resource utilization and frequency of non-elective presentations.

Assessment of EVAR Complications using CIRSE Complication Classification System in the UK Tertiary Referral Centre: A ∼6-Year Retrospective Analysis (2014-2019)

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyse complications in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) interventions and evaluate if the CIRSE (Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe) complication classification system is appropriate as a standardized classification tool for EVAR patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic, procedural and complication data in 719 consecutive patients undergoing EVAR at one institution from January 2014 to October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data (imaging reports, procedural reports, nurse notes, discharge summary reports) were collected consulting the electronic patient record system (EPR) of the hospital and cleaned and stored in a Microsoft Excel database. All the procedures were analysed in consensus by two interventional radiology consultants and a resident radiologist and if an intra- , peri- or post-procedural complication occurred, a grade (1-6) was assigned using the CIRSE grading complication classification system.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were excluded from the analysis because of invalid or incomplete data. The final population was made up of 694 patients (mean age 75,4 y.o., 616 male/78 female, min age 23 y.o., max age 97 y.o.). Complications emerged in 211 patients (30,4% of cases, 22 female/189 male). The number of patients with CIRSE grade I, II, III, IV, V and VI complications was 36 (17%), 17 (8%), 121 (57,3%), 15 (7,1%), 3 (1,4%), 19 (9%). Nineteen (2,6%) patients succumbed after EVAR. Thirty-four complications (16,1%) were related to vascular access.

CONCLUSION

The CIRSE complication classification system represents a broadly applicable and feasible approach to evaluate the severity of complications in patients following EVAR. However, some deficit may be considered relevant and as starting standing-point for future improvements.

Outcome of elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians

AIM

The need to adjust the indications of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair among patients with a limited life-span deserves a specific evaluation for octogenarians. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative results and the long-term survival after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic and/or iliac aneurysms (EVAR) in octogenarians compared with patients under 80 years of age.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 241 consecutive patients who underwent an elective EVAR between 2000 and 2017. EVAR was not considered among patients with clear life-limiting conditions. Patients receiving other than commercially standard infra-renal endoprostheses were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (29.0%) were octogenarians. They had a lower rate of active smoking (10.0% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of previous cerebrovascular disease (21.4% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.055) than younger patients. Thirty-day/in-hospital complication and mortality rates were not significantly higher among octogenarians when compared with younger patients (24.3% vs. 16.9% and 2.9% vs. 2.4%, respectively). Octogenarians had a lower long-term survival at 1, 3 and 5 years (92.6% vs. 93.3%, 67.7% vs. 78.0% and 39.3% vs. 60.6%, P = 0.039) in the bivariate analysis. However, an age ≥ 80 years per se was not an independent predictor of survival after adjustment for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

An age above 80 years was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications or long-term mortality. Our results suggest that EVAR can be considered in elderly patients without a clear life-limiting condition and with a suitable aneurysm anatomy. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 392-397.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians: clinical outcomes and complications

Background

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and mortaliy in comparison with open repair, and thus octagenarians are traditionally offered EVAR given their age and medical comorbidities. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes and predictors of complications associated with EVAR in octogenarians.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients aged 80 years and older who received an EVAR between August 2010 and January 2017 at a single centre in Toronto, Ontario. We conducted univariate comparisons and then completed logistic regression to determine predictors of complications. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to explore survival times.

Results

A total of 154 octogenarians underwent an EVAR during the study period for an infrarenal aneurysm with a mean size of 64.8 (standard deviation [SD] 12.7) mm. The mean age of the patients was 84.1 (SD 3.7) years, and most patients (81%) were men. Eighteen patients presented with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Ninety-five (62%) patients sustained a complication. Fifty percent of patients experienced an intraoperative complication. A majority of these (77%) resulted in an endoleak, with type II endoleaks requiring no further intervenion being the most common (58%, n = 45). The remaining complications (n = 70) occurred postoperatively, with myocardial ischemia (n = 24) and dysrhythmias (n = 10) being the most common. Past aortic surgery (χ2 = 8.62, p = 0.014, Cramer V = 0.27) was found to be a multivariate predictor of complications. Most patients (88%) continued follow-up to an average of 20.9 months. Twenty-one patients (13%) died. Nine of these deaths (43%) occurred during the index admission and involved a ruptured AAA. Past aortic surgery was the only predictor of vascular complications. The mean survival time after EVAR was 57.63 months for patients without events.

Conclusion

Endovascular aneurysm repair in octogenarians is a suitable form of therapy with acceptable short- and long-term results in the elective setting. Past aortic surgery was a predictor of complications in this population.

Analysis of Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Octogenarians From the ENGAGE Registry

PURPOSE

To assess periprocedural results and secondary endovascular procedure outcomes over 5 years in patients aged ≥80 vs <80 years undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global post-market registry (ENGAGE) were used for the analyses. A total of 1263 consecutive patients were enrolled in the prospective, observational, single-arm registry and divided into 2 groups according to age: ≥80 years (290, 22.9%) and <80 years (973, 77.1%). Baseline patient characteristics, risk scores according to the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, quality of life assessments [EuroQol 5 (EQ5D) index], and treatment outcomes, including all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related mortality, major adverse events, secondary endovascular procedures, and endoleaks were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Octogenarians were classified into the highest category of the SVS risk stratification system; however, this did not result in a significant difference in the 30-day mortality [1.4% (4/290) vs 1.2% (12/973) for controls; p=0.85] or major adverse event rates [5.2% (15/290) vs 3.6% (35/973), p=0.23]. Multivariable analysis confirmed that age ≥80 years, pulmonary disease, large aneurysm diameter, and renal insufficiency were significantly associated with all-cause mortality, whereas diameter was the only parameter associated with increased aneurysm-related mortality. The differences in freedom from secondary endovascular procedures over 5 years between octogenarians and controls did not reach statistical significance (88.5% vs 83.2%, p=0.07).

CONCLUSION

EVAR can be performed in individuals aged ≥80 years with no statistically significant difference in midterm aneurysm-related deaths compared with younger patients. The findings in this elderly patient cohort show that EVAR can be safely performed with acceptable morbidity rates in octogenarians.

Survival After Uncomplicated EVAR in Octogenarians is Similar to the General Population of Octogenarians Without an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

Long term survival after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in octogenarians remains unclear. This was evaluated by comparing octogenarians after EVAR with a matched group of octogenarians without an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from the Rotterdam Study (RS). The influence of complications after EVAR on survival was also studied with the aim of identifying risk factors for the development of complications in octogenarians.

METHODS

Using propensity score matching (PSM), 83 EVAR octogenarians were matched for comorbidities with 83 octogenarians from the RS, and survival was compared between these two groups using Cox proportional hazard analysis. Then, complications were studied, defined as cardiac or pulmonary, renal deterioration, access site bleeding, acute limb ischaemia or bowel ischaemia, within 30 days of surgery between 83 EVAR octogenarians and 475 EVAR non-octogenarians. Also, the difference in baseline characteristics between the octogenarians with and without complications after EVAR were studied, and survival was compared between the RS controls and the complicated and uncomplicated EVAR octogenarians separately.

RESULTS

The total EVAR octogenarian population did not show an increased mortality risk compared with RS octogenarian controls (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.97). Post-operative complications occurred in 22 octogenarians (27%) and 59 non-octogenarians (12.4%, p < .001), mainly cardiac, pulmonary, and bleeding complications. All baseline characteristics were similar in the complicated EVAR octogenarians compared with the uncomplicated EVAR octogenarians. After uncomplicated EVAR, octogenarians had a similar survival compared with the RS controls (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68-1.77), but after complicated EVAR their mortality risk increased significantly (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.06-3.54).

CONCLUSION

After standard EVAR, the life expectancy of octogenarians is the same as that of a matched group from the general population without an AAA, provided they do not develop early post-operative complications. Patient selection and meticulous peri-operative care are key.

Development of novel patient selection criteria for a short stay endovascular aneurysm repair pathway: Improving patient selection for short stay endovascular aneurysm repair

Objectives

A short-stay endovascular aneurysm repair (SS-EVAR) pathway for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms offers the potential to improve service efficiency and patient satisfaction by reducing the hospital length of stay. This study aimed to determine whether the implementation of a novel set of patient selection criteria for a theoretical SS-EVAR pathway could facilitate an expansion of the proportion of suitable patients, whilst maintaining patient safety and limiting unplanned emergency readmissions.

Methods

Two SS-EVAR selection criteria (low and high risk) were generated based upon patient pre-operative comorbidities. The low risk criteria essentially selected fit and healthy individuals, whereas the high risk criteria included patients with a range of comorbidities that could still theoretically enable enrolment onto a SS-EVAR pathway. A retrospective analysis, whereby both criteria were applied to all elective EVARs recorded in the National Vascular Registry between 2013 and 2016 at a single tertiary vascular unit was performed. Rates and timings of postoperative complications, reinterventions and unplanned readmissions for patients meeting each criteria were assessed.

Results

In total, 188 patients were included (92% male, mean age 75.4 ± 7.2 years). Twenty-nine patients (15%) met the low risk criteria. Two (7%) of these experienced an inpatient complication which were both detected within 24 h of operation (including one who required reintervention), and no patients in this group had an unplanned readmission within 30 days. One-hundred and ten patients (59%) met our high risk criteria and 19 (17%) experienced an inpatient complication, with 4 (4%) of these occurring beyond 24 h post-EVAR (three urinary problems and one acute on chronic kidney injury). Six (6%) of these patients required a reintervention; however, all of these complications were detected within 24 h. Two (2%) high risk cohort patients required unplanned readmission within 30 days for a femoral pseudoaneurysm and musculoskeletal back pain.

Conclusions

With high risk patient selection criteria and appropriate post-operative safeguards, up to 60% of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms patients could be safely enrolled onto a next-day discharge SS-EVAR pathway with minimal readmissions, thus allowing more effective resource utilisation.

Prospective cohort 20 years after endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

To describe the factors associated with survival 20 years after endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a single center.

METHODS

Prospective cohort of asymptomatic patients with an infrarenal aortic aneurysm treated with a bifurcated endovascular graft (Talent) between June 1997 and August 2008. Cox proportional hazard multivariable regression was used for analysis of independent risk factors for survival. Kaplan-Meier curves were done with the long-rank test. P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

We followed 229 patients, 184 without an endoleak and 45 with an endoleak. Ages ranged between 52 and 89 years, and the mean diameter of the aneurysm was 59.51 ± 14.6 mm. Implantation of the endovascular graft was possible in 99% of the patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.4%. In the Cox regression, age <73 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.64), aneurysm size ≤55 mm (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95), male sex (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.52), American Society of Anesthesiologists surgical risk category I and II vs III and IV (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.75), and aneurysm size reduction ≤3 mm after treatment (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.11-4.51) were significantly correlated with the survival of the patients followed in this long-term case series.

CONCLUSIONS

This 20-year prospective cohort included patients with an AAA treated with a bifurcated endovascular graft (Talent) at a university hospital in Brazil. This study supports that sex, age, aneurysm size, aneurysm size reduction, and American Society of Anesthesiologists surgical risk category are significantly correlated with patient survival after endovascular treatment of the AAA.

Outcomes of endovascular and open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is becoming the preferred treatment modality for patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Although the survival advantage of EVAR over open aortic repair (OAR) has been shown in some studies, it is unclear whether this benefit extends to elderly patients. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of rAAA repair in octogenarians.

METHODS

We reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) data set (2005-2014) to identify patients older than 80 years who were treated with EVAR and OAR for rAAA. Procedural trends were evaluated during the course of the study period. Perioperative outcomes including mortality, morbidity, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared. Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of perioperative mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

Among 1048 elderly patients who underwent rAAA repair, 450 (43%) and 598 (57%) were treated with EVAR and OAR, respectively. The use of EVAR to treat rAAA had increased significantly in this population of patients (0% in 2005 vs 56% in 2014; P < .001). The overall 30-day mortality rate among octogenarians was 41%. The mortality rate was significantly higher among those treated with OAR compared with EVAR (47% vs 33%; P < .001). Pneumonia (21% vs 10%; P < .001), reintubation (14% vs 9%; P < .001), and >48-hour ventilator dependence (43% vs 21%; P < .001) were significantly higher in patients undergoing OAR. Hospital LOS (13 vs 10 days; P < .001) was also longer in the OAR cohort. Compared with EVAR, OAR was independently predictive of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.2; P < .001), pneumonia (AOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.6; P < .001), >48-hour ventilator dependence (AOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.3; P < .001), and longer LOS (adjusted mean ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients have significant but acceptable perioperative mortality and morbidity after rAAA repair. Use of endovascular repair in the elderly population has increased and is associated with better perioperative survival and 30-day outcomes compared with traditional open repair in this study.

Aortic aneurysm trials in octogenarians: Are we really measuring the outcomes that matter?

Purpose

This study is a systematic review to determine the types of outcomes reported in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) studies of patients aged 80 and over. Specifically, it determines the types of patient-centered outcomes reported.

Method

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 2000 to 2014 for studies on AAA surgery with outcome data on patients aged 80 and over. Outcomes were categorized according to Donabedian’s framework for health quality indicators, with further classification as procedural, complication, resource or patient-centered outcome indicators.

Findings

Forty studies were reviewed. Patient-centered outcomes were infrequently reported (13%, n=5), with limited outcomes specifically relevant to older patients. No studies reported physical function, activities of daily living or cognition using validated assessment methods. Short-term mortality (95%, n=38) and complications (85%, n=34) were reported most frequently.

Conclusion

Reporting of aortic surgery outcomes in patients aged 80 and over requires a focus upon outcomes of primary importance to people of this age.

Novel Risk Score Model for Prediction of Survival Following Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify significant predictors of long-term mortality after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

We included all cases with elective EVAR based on a national data set from the Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization. Clinical and anatomic variables were analyzed with a Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression model to determine predictors of mortality and develop a score equation to categorize patients into low, medium, and high long-term mortality risk.

RESULTS

A total of 5678 patients with EVAR were included with an average age of 73.6 ± 8.2 years. The majority were male (81.6%) with a history of smoking (86.1%). There were 3 deaths within 30 days (0.1%). Several factors were associated with poor survival: unstable angina (hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; P = .008), dialysis (HR, 3.7; P < .001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 (HR, 1.7; P = .044), eGFR 30 to 59 (HR, 1.4; P = .002), age >80 (HR, 3.2; P < .001), age 75 to 79 (HR, 2.2; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on oxygen (HR, 3.3; P < .001), aortic diameter >5.8 cm (HR, 1.2; P = .043), and high risk for surgery (HR, 1.4; P = .043). Preoperative aspirin use and body mass index 25 to 35 were both found to be protective (HR, 0.78; P = .017 and HR, 0.8; P = .024, respectively). With our scoring model, 5- and 10-year survival rates for patients with low, medium, and high risk were 89.2%, 80.7%, and 64.1% and 77.2%, 60.1%, and 40.1%, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Ten-year survival following EVAR in patients with a high-risk score utilizing the model provided was 40.1%. Patients with multiple comorbidities at risk for decreased long-term survival can be identified with our model, which is more applicable for high-volume contemporary institutions.

Elective endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the operative mortality and short-term and midterm outcomes of treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Japanese patients over 80 years of age.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2011, 207 patients underwent elective repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comorbidities, operative morbidity and mortality, midterm outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The average age (endovascular aneurysm repair, 84.4 ± 0.3; open, 82.8 ± 0.3, P < 0.01) and the percentage of hostile abdomen (endovascular aneurysm repair, 22.2%; open repair, 11.1%, P < 0.05) were higher in the endovascular aneurysm repair group. Percentage of outside IFU was higher in open repair (endovascular aneurysm repair, 38.5%; open repair, 63.3%, P < 0.01). The cardiac complication (endovascular aneurysm repair, 0%; open repair, 5.6%, P < 0.01) and length of postoperative hospital stay (endovascular aneurysm repair, 10.3 ± 0.8 days; open, 18.6 ± 1.6 days, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in the endovascular aneurysm repair group. There were no differences in operative mortality (endovascular aneurysm repair, 0%; open, 1.1%, P = 0.43) and the aneurysm-related death was not observed. The rate of secondary interventions (EVAR, 5.1%; open repair, 0%, P < 0.01) and midterm mortality rate were much higher in the endovascular aneurysm repair group.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular aneurysm repair is less invasive than open repair and useful for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians; however, open repair can be acceptable treatment in the inappropriate case treated by endovascular aneurysm repair.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the geriatric population

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relatively common pathology among the elderly. More people above the age of 80 will have to undergo treatment of an AAA in the future. This review aims to summarize the literature focusing on endovascular repair of AAA in the geriatric population. A systematic review of the literature was performed, including results from endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) registries and studies comparing open repair and EVAR in those above the age of 80. A total of 15 studies were identified. EVAR in this population is efficient with a success rate exceeding 90% in all cases, and safe, with early mortality and morbidity being superior among patients undergoing EVAR against open repair. Late survival can be as high as 95% after 5 years. Aneurysm-related death over long-term follow-up was low after EVAR, ranging from 0 to 3.4%. Endovascular repair can be offered safely in the geriatric population and seems to compare favourably with open repair in all studies in the literature to date.

Safety of elective management of synchronous aortic disease with simultaneous thoracic and aortic stent graft placement

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous treatment of multilevel aortic disease is controversial due to the theoretic increase in morbidity. This study was conducted to define the outcomes in patients treated electively with simultaneous thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) and abdominal aortic endovascular endografting for synchronous aortic pathology.

METHODS

Patients treated with simultaneous TEVAR and endovascular aneurysm repair (T&E) at the University of Florida were identified from a prospectively maintained endovascular aortic registry and compared with those treated with TEVAR alone (TA). The study excluded patients with urgent or emergency indications, thoracoabdominal or mycotic aneurysm, and those requiring chimney stents, fenestrations, or visceral debranching procedures. Demographics, anatomic characteristics, operative details, and periprocedural morbidity were recorded. Mortality and reintervention were estimated using life-table analysis.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2011, 595 patients underwent TEVAR, of whom 457 had elective repair. Twenty-two (18 men, 82%) were identified who were treated electively with simultaneous T&E. Mean ± standard deviation age was 66 ± 9 years, and median follow-up was 8.8 months (range, 1-34 months). Operative indications for the procedure included dissection-related pathology in 10 (45%) and various combinations of degenerative etiologies in 12 (55%). Compared with TA, T&E patients had significantly higher blood loss (P < .0001), contrast exposure (P < .0001), fluoroscopy time (P < .0001), and operative time (P < .0001). The temporary spinal cord ischemia rate was 13.6% (n = 3) for the T&E group and 6.0% for TA (P = .15); however, the permanent spinal cord ischemia rate was 4% for both groups (P = .96). The 30-day mortality for T&E was 4.5% (n = 1) compared with 2.1% (n = 10) for TA. Temporary renal injury (defined by a 25% increase over baseline creatinine) occurred in two T&E patients (9.1%), with none requiring permanent hemodialysis; no significant difference was noted between the two groups (P = .14). One-year mortality and freedom from reintervention in the T&E patients were 81% and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable short-term morbidity and mortality can be achieved with T&E compared with TA, despite longer operative times, greater blood loss, and higher contrast exposure. There was a trend toward higher rates of renal and spinal cord injury, so implementation of strategies to reduce the potential of these complications or consideration of staged repair is recommended. Short-term reintervention rates are low, but longer follow-up and greater patient numbers are needed to determine procedural durability and applicability.