Completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England

Bailout Distal Internal Carotid Artery Stenting after Carotid Endarterectomy: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Distal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenting may be employed as a bailout maneuver when an inadequate end point or clamp injury is encountered at the time of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in a surgically inaccessible region of the distal ICA. We sought to characterize the indications, technique, and outcomes for this infrequently encountered clinical scenario.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent distal ICA stenting at the time of CEA at our institution between September 2008 and July 2022. Procedural details and postoperative follow-up were reviewed for each patient.

RESULTS

Six patients were identified during the study period. All were male with an age range of 63 to 82 years. Five underwent carotid revascularization for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, and one patient was treated for amaurosis fugax. Three patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy preoperatively, whereas 2 were on aspirin monotherapy, and one was on aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban. Five patients underwent CEA with patch angioplasty, and one underwent eversion CEA. The indication for stenting was distal ICA dissection due to clamp or shunt injury in 2 patients and an inadequate distal ICA end point in 4 patients. In all cases, access for stenting was obtained under direct visualization within the common carotid artery, and a standard carotid stent was deployed with its proximal aspect landing within the endarterectomized site. Embolic protection was typically achieved via proximal common carotid artery and external carotid artery clamping for flow arrest with aspiration of debris before restoration of antegrade flow. There was 100% technical success. Postoperatively, 2 patients were found to have a cranial nerve injury, likely occurring due to the need for high ICA exposure. Median length of stay was 2 days (range 1-7 days) with no instances of perioperative stroke or myocardial infarction. All patients were discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy with no further occurrence of stroke, carotid restenosis, or reintervention through a median follow-up of 17 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal ICA stenting is a useful adjunct in the setting of CEA complicated by inadequate end point or vessel dissection in a surgically inaccessible region of the ICA and can minimize the need for high-risk extensive distal dissection of the ICA in this situation.

An international, multispecialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document on controversial issues in the management of patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Despite the publication of various national/international guidelines, several questions concerning the management of patients with asymptomatic (AsxCS) and symptomatic (SxCS) carotid stenosis remain unanswered. The aim of this international, multi-specialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document was to address these issues to help clinicians make decisions when guidelines are unclear.

METHODS

Fourteen controversial topics were identified. A three-round Delphi Consensus process was performed including 61 experts. The aim of Round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions regarding these unresolved topics. In Round 2, clarifications were asked from each participant. In Round 3, the questionnaire was resent to all participants for their final vote. Consensus was reached when ≥75% of experts agreed on a specific response.

RESULTS

Most experts agreed that: (1) the current periprocedural/in-hospital stroke/death thresholds for performing a carotid intervention should be lowered from 6% to 4% in patients with SxCS and from 3% to 2% in patients with AsxCS; (2) the time threshold for a patient being considered "recently symptomatic" should be reduced from the current definition of "6 months" to 3 months or less; (3) 80% to 99% AsxCS carries a higher risk of stroke compared with 60% to 79% AsxCS; (4) factors beyond the grade of stenosis and symptoms should be added to the indications for revascularization in AsxCS patients (eg, plaque features of vulnerability and silent infarctions on brain computed tomography scans); and (5) shunting should be used selectively, rather than always or never. Consensus could not be reached on the remaining topics due to conflicting, inadequate, or controversial evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The present international, multi-specialty expert-based Delphi Consensus document attempted to provide responses to several unanswered/unresolved issues. However, consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting areas requiring future research.

Impact of Routine Intracerebral Completion Angiography on Outcomes After TransCarotid Artery Revascularization

OBJECTIVES

Completion intracerebral angiography (CIA) following transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) aims to identify distal embolization after stenting and serve as a measure of intraoperative quality control. Nevertheless, there is no general evidence regarding the benefit of performing routine CIA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential risk and benefit of routine CIA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database for transcarotid artery revascularization between 2016-2021. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with no CIA performed and those with completion angiography performed. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Secondary outcomes included stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI) and return to the operating room (RTOR). Clinically relevant and statistically significantly variables on univariable analysis were added to a logistic regression model clustered by center identifier.

RESULTS

A total of 18,155 patients who underwent TCAR were identified, 63.7% of them had routine CIA performed. Patients who had routine CIA were more likely to have contralateral carotid occlusion and general anesthesia. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found no difference in the risk of stroke or death (aOR): 1.03, 95%CI (0.8-1.3), P=.820), stroke/TIA (aOR, 1, 95%CI (0.8-1.3), P=.998), stroke (aOR: 1.1, 95%CI (0.8-1.4), P=.452), death (aOR: 0.98, 95%CI (0.6-1.6), P=.953), MI (aOR: 0.78, 95%CI (0.5-1.2), P=.240), or RTOR (aOR: 1.5, 95%CI (0.6-3.8), P=.412) between patients who had CIA compared to those who did not. A sub-analysis of patients who had new occlusion detected on CIA (69 patients, 0.6%; 19 not treated and 50 treated) indicated higher risk of stroke or death in patients with treated new occlusions (OR: 7.1, 95%CI (2.9-17.3), P<.001) and stroke/TIA (aOR, 5.8, 95%CI (2.3-14.7), P<.001) compared to patients who had no CIA. However, no difference in stroke/death (OR: 3.3, 95%CI (0.37-29.5), P=.283) or stroke/TIA (aOR, 3.1, 95%CI (0.3-29.4), P=.327) was found in patients with non-treated new occlusions compared to patients who had no CIA.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, routine performance of completion cerebral angiography was not beneficial with no significant differences in in-hospital stroke or death detected. Detection of new lesions on completion cerebral angiography was rare. Moreover, identifying new occlusions following intracranial angiography was associated with higher odds of stroke or death when these new lesions are treated. Further studies are needed to define the etiology of worse outcomes in patients undergoing intervention for lesions discovered on completion cerebral angiogram and delineate optimal timing for further imaging and intervention.

Completion Arteriogram Following Carotid Endarterectomy Yields Lower Perioperative Stroke Rate

Introduction: Completion imaging following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains controversial. We present our experience performing routine completion arteriography (CA). Methods: A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained institutional database was performed for patients undergoing isolated CEA. Results: 1439 isolated CEAs with CA were performed on 1297 patients. CEA was for asymptomatic lesions in 70% (1003) of cases. There were no complications related to arteriography. An abnormal arteriogram documented significant abnormalities in the internal carotid artery (ICA) and prompted revision in 1.7% (24/1439) of cases: 20 unsatisfactory distal endpoints of the endarterectomy (12 residual stenoses, 7 intimal flaps, and 1 dissection), 3 kinks or stenoses within the body of the patch, and 1 thrombus. Of the 20 distal endpoint lesions, stent deployment was used in 17 cases and patch revision in 3 cases. The other 4 cases were treated by patch angioplasty (3) or thrombectomy (1). None suffered a perioperative stroke. The overall 30-day stroke, death, and combined stroke/death rate for the 1439 patients in our series was 1.5% (22), .5% (7), and 1.9% (27), respectively. The combined stroke/death rate for asymptomatic lesions was 1.1% (11/1003) and for symptomatic lesions was 2.5% (11/436). Of the 22 strokes in the entire series (all with normal CA), 15 were non-hemorrhagic strokes ipsilateral to the CEA; 14 were confirmed to have widely patent endarterectomy sites by CT-A (13) or re-exploration and repeat arteriography (1). The occluded site was re-explored and underwent thrombectomy, but no technical problems were identified. The remaining strokes were hemorrhagic (4 reperfusion syndrome and 1 surgical site bleeding) or contralateral to the CEA (2). Conclusion: Although not all patients in this series who underwent intraoperative revision due to abnormal CA might have suffered a stroke, performing this simple and safe study may have halved our overall perioperative stroke rate from 3.2% to 1.5%.

Intraoperative completion studies in carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Declining perioperative stroke and death rates over the past 3 decades have been paralleled by an increasing use of intraoperative completion studies (ICS) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Techniques applied include angiography, intraoperative duplex ultrasound (IDUS), flowmetry, and angioscopy. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming on providing an overview of techniques and corresponding outcomes.

METHODS

A PubMed based systematic literature review comprising the years 1980 through 2020 was performed using predefined keywords to identify articles on different ICS techniques. Pooled analyses and meta-analyses estimating risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed to compare outcomes of different ICS modes to nonapplication of any ICS. I2 values were assessed to quantify study heterogeneities.

RESULTS

Identification of 34 studies including patients undergoing CEA with angiography (n=53,218), IDUS (n=20,030), flowmetry (n=16,812), and angioscopy (n=2,291). Corresponding rates of perioperative stroke were 1.5%, 1.8%, 3.6%, and 1.5%, perioperative stroke or death occurred in 1.7%, 1.9%, 2.2%, and 2.0%. Intraoperative surgical revision rates were 6.2%, 5.9%, and 7.9% after CEA with angiography, IDUS, and angioscopy, respectively. Compared to nonapplication of any ICS, the pooled analysis revealed angiography to be significantly associated with lower rates of stroke (RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62; P<0.0001) and stroke or death (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.83; P<0.0001). IDUS was significantly associated with lower rates of stroke (RR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.73; P<0.0001) and stroke or death (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P=0.0018), whereas angioscopy showed a significant association with a lower stroke rate (RR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.033-0.68; P=0.0001), but no effect on the combined stroke or death rate. Angioscopy was associated with a higher intraoperative revision rate compared to angiography (RR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54; P=0.006). The meta-analyses confirmed lower perioperative stroke or death rates for angiography (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91) and IDUS (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98) compared to non-application of any ICS, whereas flowmetry showed no significant association.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first systematic literature review and meta-analysis on usage of ICSs in CEA. Data strongly indicate a significant beneficial effect of angiography, IDUS, and angioscopy on perioperative CEA outcomes. Any carotid surgeon should consider implementation of ICSs in his routine armamentarium.

Applications of intraoperative Duplex ultrasound in vascular surgery: a systematic review

Objective

This review aims to summarise the contemporary uses of intraoperative completion Duplex ultrasound (IODUS) for the assessment of lower extremity bypass surgery (LEB) and carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA).

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search using the databases of MEDLINE. Eligible studies evaluated the use of IODUS during LEB or CEA.

Results

We found 22 eligible studies; 16 considered the use of IODUS in CEA and 6 in LEB. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies in terms of intervention, outcome measures and follow-up. In the assessment of CEA, there is conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of completion imaging. However, analysis from the largest study suggests a modest reduction in adjusted risk of stroke/mortality when using IODUS selectively (RR 0.74, CI 0.63–0.88, p = 0.001). Evidence also suggests that uncorrected residual flow abnormalities detected on IODUS are associated with higher rates of restenosis (range 2.1% to 20%). In the assessment of LEB, we found a paucity of evidence when considering the benefit of IODUS on patency rates or when considering its utility as compared to other imaging modalities. However, the available evidence suggests higher rates of thrombosis or secondary intervention in grafts with uncorrected residual flow abnormalities (up to 36% at 3 months).

Conclusions

IODUS can be used to detect defects in both CEA and LEB procedures. However, there is a need for more robust prospective studies to determine the best scanning strategy, criteria for intervention and the impact on clinical outcomes.

Practice patterns in the use of completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

The use of intraoperative completion imaging (completion carotid duplex ultrasound or angiography) to confirm the technical adequacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains a matter of controversy. The purpose of this study was to describe vascular surgeons' practice patterns in the use of completion imaging after CEA and to study the association between completion imaging and postoperative stroke/death and high-grade restenosis (>70%).

METHODS

Patients who underwent CEA without concomitant procedures in the Vascular Quality Initiative database between 2003 and 2018 were included. Surgeons' practice patterns were defined on the basis of the distribution of completion imaging use among annual CEA cases per surgeon. Multivariable and Cox proportional hazards models were used to study the association between different practice patterns of completion imaging and perioperative and 1-year outcomes after CEA.

RESULTS

Of 98,055 CEA cases, 26,716 (27.3%) were performed with completion imaging. Compared with cases in which completion imaging was not performed, completion imaging was associated with increased rates of immediate re-exploration (3.5% vs 0.9%; odds ratio [OR], 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.74-5.38; P < .001), overall return to the operating room (RTOR; 1.6% vs 1.2%; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.42; P < .01), and longer operative time (median [interquartile range], 105 minutes [82-132] vs 119 minutes [92-148]; P < .001). Of 1920 surgeons in our cohort, 45% never performed completion imaging, whereas 26% rarely performed completion imaging (for ≤20% of annual CEA cases), 9.5% performed it selectively (21%-79% of annual CEAs), and 19.6% used completion imaging routinely (≥80% of annual CEAs). Rarely performing completion imaging had higher rates of immediate re-exploration (6.5% vs 0.9%; OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 5.7-9.2; P < .001), in-hospital stroke (4.0% vs 1.1%; adjusted OR [aOR], 3.4; 95% CI, 2.6-4.6; P < .001), RTOR for bleeding (1.9% vs 0.9%; aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5-2.9; P < .001), and neurologic events (1.5% vs 0.4%; aOR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2-5.9; P < .001) compared with not performing completion imaging. It was also associated with increased stroke/death and repeated revascularization at 30 days and significant restenosis at 1 year. On the other hand, performance of selective and routine completion imaging was associated with increased immediate re-exploration (selective: aOR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.9-5.5; P < .001]; routine: aOR, 3.7 [95% CI, 2.5-5.6; P < .001]) without any increase in in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year adverse outcomes compared with cases performed without completion imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of selective or routine completion imaging during CEA is safe and is not associated with increased adverse events compared with not using intraoperative completion imaging. However, rarely performing completion imaging is associated with a significant increase in the odds of perioperative stroke/death and RTOR, possibly because of unnecessary re-exploration for minor defects. The operator's experience and establishing a criterion for fixing residual defects are important to avoid unnecessary re-exploration.

Completion imaging techniques and their clinical role after carotid endarterectomy: Systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Completion imaging has been suggested for the intraoperative quality control assessment of the carotid endarterectomy technical success, in order to immediately resolve pathologic findings and accordingly improve patients' outcome. The aim of this study was to present existing evidence of different completion imaging techniques after carotid endarterectomy and their role on clinical outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed searching in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases including studies reporting on completion imaging techniques after carotid endarterectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 12,378 patients in 35 studies (20 retrospective and 15 prospective) underwent a completion imaging technique after carotid endarterectomy: in 19 studies, 5340 patients underwent arteriography; in 5 studies, 2095 angioscopy; in 21 studies, 5722 DUS; and in 2 studies, 150 patients underwent transcranial Doppler. Ten studies assessed > 1 imaging technique. The mean age was 67 ± 7 years old (69% males) with common co-morbidities to be hypertension (74%), smoking (64%), and hyperlipidemia (54%). Almost half of the patients (4949; 44%) were treated for symptomatic disease. In 1104 (9.7%) patients, a major defect was identified intra-operatively, while in 329 patients (2.9%), a minor defect. Common pathological findings were the presence of mural thrombus, carotid dissection, residual stenosis, and intimal flaps. An immediate re-intervention was undertaken in 75% (790/1053) of the patients to treat a major intra-operative imaging finding. In patients with re-intervention, only 2.3% (14/609) had an intra-operative stroke and 0.8% (5/609), a transient ischemic attack, while only 1.4% (8/575) had a stroke and 0.2% a transient ischemic attack (1/575) during 30-day post-operative period. No intra-operative death was reported. In the same period, the restenosis rate of internal and common carotid artery was 0.5% (3/575) and 0.2% (1/575), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Completion imaging techniques can detect defects in almost 10% of patients that may lead to immediate intra-operative surgical revision with low intra-operative stroke/transient ischemic attack rate and low early carotid restenosis. During the 30-day follow-up period, in those patients, the incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attack may be low but present. This review cannot provide any evidence on which completion imaging technique is better, and the clinical impact conferred by each technique in the absence of a randomized control studies.

[Intraoperative completion diagnostics in open vascular surgery]

Intraoperative imaging diagnostics during open vascular surgical procedures aim to enhance diagnostic certainty during the operation, ensure quality control documentation and reduce avoidable complications; however, the evidence for the various diagnostic imaging procedures with respect to improvement of perioperative outcome is not confirmed for carotid endarterectomy or for infrainguinal bypass surgery. Nevertheless, an intraoperative diagnostic control is principally recommended. The advantage of intraoperative imaging is confirmed and essential for the surgical reconstruction of bypass occlusions and acute thromboembolic occlusions.

Outcomes and Risk Factors Associated with Prolonged Intubation after EVAR

BACKGROUND

Time to discharge has decreased for aortic surgery since the advent of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), partially due to improved perioperative management. We aimed to investigate outcomes and risk factors associated with prolonged intubation following EVAR.

METHODS

The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) database was queried to select all patients who underwent elective EVAR between January 2003 and December 2014. Patients who were not extubated in the operating room were classified as having prolonged intubation. Patients requiring prolonged intubation were compared with those extubated in the operating room using t-test and chi-square statistics. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses estimated all-cause mortality. Independent predictors associated with prolonged intubation, including postoperative pneumonia or respiratory failure, were examined using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 3,979 patients were identified within the elective EVAR VSGNE data set, among whom 5.2% required prolonged intubation. Patients with prolonged intubation were older, more frequently female, non-Hispanic, had larger aneurysms, and had a more frequent diagnoses of diabetes, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, ejection fraction < 50%, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (all P < 0.05). Respiratory complications occurred in 25.5% of patients with prolonged intubation vs. 1.8% of patients who were extubated in the operating room (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates suggested patients requiring prolonged intubation after EVAR had significantly lower survivals than those who extubated in the operating room (P < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, independent risk factors associated with prolonged intubation included subjective lack of fitness for open procedure (OR: 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.5-8.7), ejection fraction < 50% (1.8, 1.3-2.8), and ASA class >3 (1.5, 1.1-1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged intubation following EVAR is associated with increased risk of postoperative respiratory complications, as well as decreased long-term survival. High-risk patients for prolonged intubation, including those deemed subjectively unfit for an open procedure, ejection fraction < 50% and ASA class >3, may not benefit from an elective EVAR.

Carotid Endarterectomy in the Southern California Vascular Outcomes Improvement Collaborative

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to examine the variation in practice patterns and associated outcomes for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within the Southern California Vascular Outcomes Improvement Collaborative (So Cal VOICe), a regional quality group of the Vascular Quality Initiative.

METHODS

All cases entered in the CEA registry by the So Cal VOICe were included in the study.

RESULTS

From September 2010 through September 2015, 1,110 CEA cases were entered by 9 centers in the So Cal VOICe. Six hundred seventy-seven patients (61%) were male with mean age of 73 years. Nine hundred eighty-eight (89%) were hypertensive, 655 (59%) were prior or current smokers, 389 (35%) were diabetics, and 233 (21%) had coronary artery disease. Eight hundred twenty-one (74%) patients were asymptomatic (no history of ipsilateral neurologic event). The percentage of asymptomatic patients varied across the 9 centers from 57% to 91%. Preoperatively, 344 (31%) underwent cardiac stress test, center variation 13-75%, 500 (45%) underwent only duplex, center variation 11-72%. Intraoperatively, 600 (54%) underwent routine shunting, whereas 67 (6%) were shunted for an indication, and 444 (40%) were not shunted. Wound drainage was used in 422 (38%) cases, center variation 2-98%. Completion imaging by duplex and/or angiogram was performed in 766 (69%) cases, center variation 0-100%. Postoperatively, 11 (1%) patients had a new ipsilateral postoperative neurologic event, center variation 0-1.3%, 6 (0.5%) had a postoperative myocardial infarction, center variation 0-1.3%, and 8 (0.7%) required return to operating room for bleeding, center variation 0-1.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite wide variation in practice patterns surrounding CEA in the So Cal VOICe, postoperative complications were uniformly low. Further work will focus on identifying practices that can be modified to improve cost-effectiveness while maintaining excellent outcomes.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography Angiography: A Novel Completion Imaging Modality for Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative computed tomography angiography (ICTA) is a novel completion imaging modality for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). No studies exist in the literature describing ICTA use in CEA.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ICTA as a method of immediately evaluating the technical results of CEA.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive CEAs were performed by a single neurosurgeon over an 8-month period. Of this series, 12 utilized ICTA for completion imaging, 10 utilized duplex ultrasonography (US), and 1 utilized no intraoperative completion imaging. Electronic medical records were reviewed to assess demographics, CTA results, US results, and need for revisions.

RESULTS

Patients included 13 men (62%) and 8 women (38%). All patients had symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch angioplasty was used in 16 cases (70%). Average operative times were comparable between cases that utilized CTA and US, 180 and 175 min, respectively. Major technical defects were identified in one of the 12 cases utilizing ICTA and none of the 10 cases utilizing intraoperative US. The technical defect was revised without subsequent neurological complication. One patient had a postoperative intracerebral hemorrhage requiring surgical evacuation. Fifteen patients were followed for up to 3 months with no postoperative stroke or transient ischemic attacks.

CONCLUSION

ICTA is a potentially safe and effective completion imaging modality compared to traditional alternatives, enabling the identification of technical deficits intraoperatively. While no statistically significant difference in operative times were noted between intraoperative CTA and US use, numerous steps must be taken to maximize the efficiency of ICTA.

Intraoperative Completion Studies, Local Anesthesia, and Antiplatelet Medication Are Associated With Lower Risk in Carotid Endarterectomy

Background and Purpose—

In Germany, all surgical and endovascular procedures on the carotid bifurcation must be documented in a statutory nationwide quality assurance database. We aimed to analyze the association between procedural and perioperative variables and in-hospital stroke or death rates after carotid endarterectomy.

Methods—

Between 2009 and 2014, overall 142 074 elective carotid endarterectomy procedures for asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were documented in the database. The primary outcome of this secondary data analysis was in-hospital stroke or death. Major stroke or death, stroke, and death, each until discharge were secondary outcomes. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were assessed by multivariable multilevel regression analyses.

Results—

The primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of patients, with a rate of 1.4% in asymptomatic and 2.5% in symptomatic patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, lower risks of stroke or death were independently associated with local anesthesia (versus general anesthesia: RR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–0.95), carotid endarterectomy with patch plasty compared with primary closure (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52–0.97), intraoperative completion studies by duplex ultrasound (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63–0.88) or angiography (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71–0.90), and perioperative antiplatelet medication (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.97). No shunting and a short cross-clamp time were also associated with lower risks; however, these are suspected to be confounded.

Conclusions—

Local anesthesia, patch plasty compared with primary closure, intraoperative completion studies by duplex ultrasound or angiography, and perioperative antiplatelet medication were independently associated with lower in-hospital stroke or death rates after carotid endarterectomy.

Intraoperative sonography during carotid endarterectomy: normal appearance and spectrum of complications

Carotid endarterectomy is a commonly performed procedure for prevention of stroke related to carotid stenosis. Intraoperative sonography is used to identify potentially correctable technical defects during carotid endarterectomy. The main risk of endarterectomy is perioperative stroke, and great effort has been put into trying to reduce this risk through various surgical techniques and evaluation of the surgical bed. Postoperative carotid thrombosis, or thombo-embolization from the arterectomy site, remains a common cause of perioperative stroke and is often related to technical defects in the arterial reconstruction procedure. Re-exploration and repair of any imperfections have the potential to improve outcomes. Intraoperative imaging can identify potentially occult lesions, provide the option for correction, and thus reduce chance of stroke. Familiarity with the spectrum of intraoperative sonographic findings helps correctly identify residual intimal dissection flaps, plaque, thrombi, and stenosis, which may require immediate surgical revision. Our objective is to illustrate the spectrum of intraoperative findings and their importance.

Asymptomatic dissecting intimal lesions of common carotid arteries after carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

Carotid endarterectomy is a standard treatment for symptomatic high-degree internal carotid artery stenosis. The aim of this article is to present possible intimal lesions after carotid endarterectomy. These lesions could be manifested as intimal flaps, intimal steps or dissections with or without occlusion or stenosis of the artery.

METHODS

The evaluation of the frequency and characteristics of the asymptomatic dissecting intimal lesions of the common carotid arteries was performed in a sample of 100 patients who underwent endarterectomy for symptomatic high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery.

RESULTS

We found five patients with asymptomatic dissecting intimal lesions of the common carotid arteries.

CONCLUSION

The most common causes of these intimal lesions were shunting and prolongation of the clamping time. Routine carotid ultrasound follow-up exams are necessary because of the potential need for a change in the antithrombotic therapy or due to a need to perform an endovascular treatment.

Clinical relevance of cranial nerve injury following carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

The benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may be diminished by cranial nerve injury (CNI). Using a quality improvement registry, we aimed to identify the nerves affected, duration of symptoms (transient vs. persistent), and clinical predictors of CNI.

METHODS

We identified all patients undergoing CEA in the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) between 2003 and 2011. Surgeon-observed CNI rate was determined at discharge (postoperative CNI) and at follow-up to determine persistent CNI (CNIs that persisted at routine follow-up visit). Hierarchical multivariable model controlling for surgeon and hospital was used to assess independent predictors for postoperative CNI.

RESULTS

A total of 6,878 patients (33.8% symptomatic) were included for analyses. CNI rate at discharge was 5.6% (n = 382). Sixty patients (0.7%) had more than one nerve affected. The hypoglossal nerve was most frequently involved (n = 185, 2.7%), followed by the facial (n = 128, 1.9%), the vagus (n = 49, 0.7%), and the glossopharyngeal (n = 33, 0.5%) nerve. The vast majority of these CNIs were transient; only 47 patients (0.7%) had a persistent CNI at their follow-up visit (median 10.0 months, range 0.3-15.6 months). Patients with perioperative stroke (0.9%, n = 64) had significantly higher risk of CNI (n = 15, CNI risk 23.4%, p < .01). Predictors for CNI were urgent procedures (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1, p < .01), immediate re-exploration after closure under the same anesthetic (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.0, p < .01), and return to the operating room for a neurologic event or bleeding (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8, p < .01), but not redo CEA (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-1.9, p = .90) or prior cervical radiation (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-2.5, p = .80).

CONCLUSIONS

As patients are currently selected in the VSGNE, persistent CNI after CEA is rare. While conditions of urgency and (sub)acute reintervention carried increased risk for postoperative CNI, a history of prior ipsilateral CEA or cervical radiation was not associated with increased CNI rate.