Distal anastomotic vein adjunct usage in infrainguinal prosthetic bypasses

Long-Term Outcomes of Vein Adjuncts in Distal Infrainguinal Bypass

BACKGROUND

Autologous vein is recommended for infrainguinal bypass due to improved freedom from occlusion compared to prosthetic graft. In patients without adequate vein, a vein adjunct at the distal anastomosis has been suggested to improve patency in small studies. This study aimed to determine if performance of a distal vein adjunct was associated with improved freedom from occlusion in below-knee popliteal and tibial bypasses compared to prosthetic bypass alone.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the Vascular Quality Initiative Infrainguinal Bypass database was conducted. Patients undergoing prosthetic-only and prosthetic with vein adjuncts were compared. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, and bypass to below-knee popliteal or tibial vessels. Exclusion criteria included autologous vein conduits and prior interventions. Groups were further divided into below-knee popliteal and tibial subgroups.

RESULTS

A cohort of 3,939 patients underwent bypass to the below-knee popliteal artery, with 287 (7.3%) receiving vein adjuncts. More patients were male (68.8 vs. 57.8%, P < 0.001) and had higher rates of congestive heart failure (21.1 vs. 16.0%, P = 0.040) within the below-knee popliteal group. Two-year bypass occlusion was decreased in patients receiving vein adjuncts (11.6 vs. 17.1%, P = 0.004). A cohort of 2,378 patients underwent tibial bypass, with 473 (19.9%) receiving vein adjuncts. Within the tibial group, patients were similar in age, body mass index, race, comorbidities, and indications. Bypass occlusion (24.8 vs. 17.6%, P = 0.005) and amputation (20.5 vs. 15.9%, P = 0.048) rates at 2 years were worse for patients who did not receive a distal vein adjunct to tibial arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal vein adjuncts are associated with improved freedom from occlusion, amputation, major adverse limb events, and overall survival when compared to bypasses performed with prosthetic graft alone for tibial bypasses within the Vascular Quality Initiative. A vein adjunct was not associated with improved freedom from occlusion in below-knee popliteal bypasses. Consideration should be given to utilization of a distal vein adjunct to improve prosthetic bypass longevity and limb salvage for patients requiring tibial bypasses.

Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on peripheral artery disease

Patients with peripheral artery disease and generalized atherosclerosis are at high risk of cardiovascular and limb complications, affecting both quality of life and longevity. Lower limb atherosclerotic disease is associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and adequate management is founded on treatments involving patient-dependent factors, such as lifestyle changes, and physician-dependent factors, such as clinical treatment, endovascular treatment, or conventional surgery. Medical management of peripheral artery disease is multifaceted, and its most important elements are reduction of cholesterol level, antithrombotic therapy, control of arterial blood pressure, control of diabetes, and smoking cessation. Adhesion to this regime can reduce complications related to the limbs, such as chronic limb-threatening ischemia, that can result in amputation, and the systemic complications of atherosclerosis, such as stroke and myocardial infarction.

Outcomes of Prosthetic and Biological Grafts Compared to Arm Vein Grafts in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

OBJECTIVES

The optimal conduit for infrainguinal bypass (IIB) is single segment great saphenous vein (GSV). Unfortunately, GSV is not always available in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). Other graft choices include arm vein grafts (AV), prosthetic grafts (PG) or biologic grafts (BG). Current data regarding the durability and limb salvage rates of those options is scarce, hence we aimed to investigate the impact of alternative graft types on post-operative and long-term outcomes on IIB in patients with CLTI.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was queried for patients undergoing IIB from January 2003 to April 2024. Patients were stratified into three groups: arm vein (cephalic, basilic), prosthetic grafts [Dacron, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)], and biologic grafts (cadaveric, homograft, or xenograft). Saphenous vein grafts (greater and lesser saphenous) were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed postoperative outcomes: 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), graft occlusion, prolonged length of stay >7days (PLOS), packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion >2 units, and infection. Cox Regression was used to report one-year outcomes: mortality, major amputation (above-ankle), and major adverse limb events (MALE defined as major amputation, thrombectomy or reintervention).

RESULTS

A total of 9165 IIB procedures have been analyzed: AV 417 (4.55%); PG 7520 (82.05%); BG 1228 (13.40%). Compared to AV, patients receiving PG had higher odds of infection (aOR 2.89, p=0.045) and higher hazard of one-year mortality (aHR 1.51, p=0.035). On the other hand, patients receiving BG had higher risk of graft occlusion (aOR 4.55, p=0.040) and infection (aOR 2.78, p=0.046) as well higher hazard of one-year mortality (aHR 1.53, p=0.040), amputation (aHR 1.72, p=0.019) and amputation or death (aHR 1.52, p=0.005) compared to AV. After stratifying by bypass configuration, AV had the highest overall survival and amputation-free survival among the three alternative conduits in below-knee popliteal and tibial bypass targets.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large multi-institutional study investigating alternative conduits to GSV, AV are found to be the most resistant to infections and are associated with the best overall survival and limb salvage outcomes compared to PG and BG particularly in below-knee distal targets. In cases where no GSV is available, AV and PG are acceptable alternatives with comparable one-year amputation-free survival and MALE-free survival rates. On the other hand, BG are associated with higher risk of graft occlusion and lower freedom from major amputation and death compared to AV.

Alternative Conduits for Lower Extremity Bypass

While single-segment great saphenous vein (GSV) remains the gold-standard conduit for infrainguinal bypass, several alternative options are available for use when GSV is absent in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia requiring infrainguinal revascularization including alternative autologous vein, prosthetic conduits, and cryopreserved vein grafts.

Predictors of amputation-free survival and wound healing after infrainguinal bypass with alternative conduits

OBJECTIVE

Inadequate vein quality or prior harvest precludes use of autologous single segment greater saphenous vein (ssGSV) in many patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Predictors of patient outcome after infrainguinal bypass with alternative (non-ssGSV) conduits are not well-understood. We explored whether limb presentation, bypass target, and conduit type were associated with amputation-free survival (AFS) after infrainguinal bypass using alternative conduits.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study (2013-2020) was conducted of 139 infrainguinal bypasses performed for CLTI with cryopreserved ssGSV (cryovein) (n = 71), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (n = 23), or arm/spliced vein grafts (n = 45). Characteristics, Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage, and outcomes were recorded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and classification and regression tree analysis modeled predictors of AFS.

RESULTS

Within 139 cases, the mean age was 71 years, 59% of patients were male, and 51% of cases were nonelective. More patients undergoing bypass with cryovein were WIfI stage 4 (41%) compared with PTFE (13%) or arm/spliced vein (27%) (P = .04). Across groups, AFS at 2 years was 78% for spliced/arm, 79% for PTFE, and 53% for cryovein (adjusted hazard ratio for cryovein, 2.5; P = .02). Among cases using cryovein, classification and regression tree analysis showed that WIfI stage 3 or 4, age >70 years, and prior failed bypass were predictive of the lowest AFS at 2 years of 36% vs AFS of 58% to 76% among subgroups with less than two of these factors. Although secondary patency at 2 years was worse in the cryovein group (26% vs 68% and 89% in arm/spliced and PTFE groups; P < .01), in patients with tissue loss there was no statistically significant difference in wound healing in the cryovein group (72%) compared with other bypass types (72% vs 87%, respectively; P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CLTI lacking suitable ssGSV, bypass with autogenous arm/spliced vein or PTFE has superior AFS compared with cryovein, although data were limited for PTFE conduits for distal targets. Despite poor patency with cryovein, wound healing is achieved in a majority of cases, although it should be used with caution in older patients with high WIfI stage and prior failed bypass, given the low rates of AFS.

Tapered reinforced graft and vein cuff in the distal anastomosis as adjunct strategies for infrapopliteal prosthetic bypass graft in chronic limb-threatening ischemia: A case report

The great saphenous vein is the optimal conduit for infrapopliteal bypass surgery in chronic limb-threatening ischemia. A prosthetic bypass graft is an acceptable option when the autologous vein is unavailable and the anatomy is not favorable for endovascular therapy. However, the low patency rate of prosthetic grafts calls for adjunct strategies to improve the outcomes. Tapered reinforced grafts and vein cuffs are proposed measures. We herein present a case of a 78-year-old man with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and an extensive necrotic lesion on the dorsum of the left foot. He was successfully treated with a prosthetic bypass using two adjunct strategies to help improve patency: a tapered reinforced graft and a vein cuff in the distal anastomosis. After debridement and partial skin grafting, the wound healed completely in 2 months. The bypass graft was patent for 1 year.

Non-reversed bifurcated vein graft improves time to healing in ischemic patients undergoing lower limb distal bypass

BACKGROUND

Bifurcated vein grafts have been described in reconstructive microsurgery. No comparative studies have been published in lower limb arterial revascularization. The aim of this study was to compare non-reversed bifurcated vs. single vein graft in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing lower limb distal bypass.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2021 193 CLTI patients have been treated at our center with vein bypass, and distal anastomosis on infrapopliteal vessels; 137 patients (71%) received a single graft (Group SIN), and 56 patients (29%) had a bifurcated bypass (Group BIF). Primary outcomes measures were time to healing, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage. Two-year outcomes according to Kaplan-Meier curves were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Both groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic data, preoperative risk factors, and clinical presentation except for an elderly age in Group BIF (77.5 vs. 71.5 years; P<0.001). Intraoperative technical success was achieved in all patients. Overall median duration of follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range 9-36). Wound healing did not differ between the two groups (77.4% Group SIN vs. 73.2% Group BIF; P=0.33). Mean time to healing was faster in Group BIF (2.4 vs. 6.8 months; P<0.001). At 2-year follow-up there were no differences between the two groups in terms of primary patency (71.4% Group SIN vs. 54% Group BIF; P=0.10), primary assisted patency (81.7% Group SIN vs. 76.4% Group BIF; P=0.53), secondary patency (85.1% Group SIN vs. 80.9% Group BIF; P=0.79), and limb salvage (92.3% Group SIN vs. 87.2% Group BIF; P=0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Bifurcated graft improved time to healing in CLTI patients undergoing infrapopliteal non-reversed vein bypass. Two-year overall patencies and limb salvage did not differ accordingly to vein graft configuration (single vs. bifurcated).

Comparison of arterial and venous allograft bypass in chronic limb-threatening ischemia

INTRODUCTION

Femoro-popliteal bypass with autologous vascular graft is a key revascularization method in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, the lack of suitable autologous conduit may occur in 15-45% of the patients, necessitating the implantation of prosthetic or allogen grafts. Only little data is available on the outcome of allograft use in CLTI.

AIMS

Our objective were to evaluate the long term results of infrainguinal allograft bypass surgery in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and compare the results of arterial and venous allografts.

METHODS

Single center, retrospective study analysing the outcomes of infrainguinal allograft bypass surgery in patients with CLTI between January 2007 and December 2017.

RESULTS

During a 11-year period, 134 infrainguinal allograft bypasses were performed for CLTI [91 males (67.9%)]. Great saphenous vein (GSV) was implanted in 100 cases, superficial femoral artery (SFA) was implanted in 34 cases. Early postoperative complications appeared in 16.4% of cases and perioperative mortality (<30 days) was 1.4%. Primary patency at one, three and five years was 59%, 44% and 41%, respectively, while secondary patency was 60%, 45% and 41%, respectively. Primary patency of the SFA allografts was significantly higher than GSV allografts (1 year: SFA: 84% vs. GSV: 51% p = 0,001; 3 years: SFA: 76% vs. GSV: 32% p = 0,001; 5 years: SFA: 71% vs. GSV: 30% p = 0.001). Both primary and secondary patency of SFA allograft implanted in below-knee position were significantly higher than GSV bypasses (p = 0.0006; p = 0.0005, respectively). Limb salvage at one, three and five years following surgery was 74%, 64% and 62%, respectively. Long-term survival was 53% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Allograft implantation is a suitable method for limb salvage in CLTI. The patency of arterial allograft is better than venous allograft patency, especially in below-knee position during infrainguinal allograft bypass surgery.

Alternative autologous and biologic conduits have worse outcomes than prosthetic grafts for infrainguinal bypass in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Single segment great saphenous vein (GSV) is the preferred conduit in infrainguinal bypass. Alternative autologous conduits (AAC) and nonautologous biologic conduits (NABC) are thought to be a better alternative to traditional prosthetic conduits (PC) in the absence of GSV. In this study we analyzed the outcomes of these alternative conduits in lower extremity bypasses (LEB) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative LEB database from 2003 to 2020 was queried for this study, to identify LEB in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Primary outcomes were graft patency, major adverse limb events (MALE), and MALE-free survival at 1 year. Standard statistical methods were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 22,671 LEB procedures (12,810 GSV, 6002 PC, 1907 AAC, and 1952 NABC). Compared with the GSV group, the other conduit patients were significantly older, had more comorbidities, had an increased rate of prior lower extremity interventions, had a higher rate of infrageniculate bypass targets, and were less ambulatory at baseline. The PC, AAC, and NABC groups had significantly higher rates of postoperative morbidity compared with the GSV group. The PC group had a higher 30-day mortality compared with the GSV, AAC, and NABC groups (3% PC vs 2% GSV, 2% AAC, 2% NABC; P = .049). Both PC and NABC had higher 1-year mortality compared with GSV and AAC (13% PC and 13% NABC vs 10% GSV, 10% AAC; P = .02). In an adjusted Cox regression model (stratified by infrageniculate target and adjusted for age, comorbidities, and prior vascular interventions) PC was not significantly different from GSV, but AAC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.67; P < .001) and NABC (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.61-2.25; P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of loss of primary patency. A similar association with MALE was observed: both AAC (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.15-1.58; P < .001) and NABC (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.53-2.11; P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of MALE compared with GSV; PC was not significantly different from GSV.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of GSV, alternative conduits (autologous or nonautologous biologic) do not confer a benefit with regard to graft patency or MALE compared with PCs. Increased operating time or costs associated with the use of these conduits is not justified based on this study.

Distal vein patch use and limb events after infragenicular prosthetic bypasses

OBJECTIVE

In the absence of suitable autologous vein, the use of prosthetic grafts for infragenicular bypasses in peripheral arterial disease has become standard practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether creating a vein patch at the distal anastomosis would further improve patency and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALEs). Furthermore, we sought to investigate whether the use of a distal vein patch (DVP) was associated with lower rates of acute limb ischemia (ALI) for those presenting with occluded prosthetic bypass graft.

METHODS

The cases of all patients undergoing infragenicular prosthetic bypass grafts between January 2009 and July 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics of the patients, clinical data, and outcomes (graft patency and MALEs) were collected. Patients were compared according to treatment group (DVP vs no DVP). A Cox regression analysis was used to analyze follow-up results.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 373 patients underwent infragenicular bypass at our institution; of those, 93 (24.9%) had prosthetic grafts (DVP, 39; no DVP, 54). Overall, 92 (98.9%) patients were male; the mean age was 63.3 ± 6.6 years and did not differ between the two groups. Patients undergoing prosthetic bypass with DVP were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (38.5% vs 14.8%; P = .009) and less likely to have chronic kidney disease (2.6% vs 20.4%; P = .011). Follow-up data were available for all patients for a median of 7.8 months (range, 1-89 months). After adjustment for differences in demographics and clinical data between the two groups, when outcomes were analyzed, MALEs were significantly lower in the DVP group (35.9% vs 57.4%; odds ratio [OR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.9; P = .041). Similarly, reintervention rates were significantly lower in the DVP group (30.8% vs 50.0%; OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; P = .044). There was a trend toward higher primary patency in the DVP group (46.2% vs 35.2%; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.7-3.5; P = .206) and lower rates of ALI after bypass occlusion (30.0% vs 42.9%; OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.8; P = .345). A Cox regression time-to-event analysis revealed late separation of freedom from MALEs for DVP relative to no DVP (log rank, P = .269).

CONCLUSIONS

In this evaluation of infragenicular prosthetic bypass grafts, the creation of a vein patch at the distal anastomosis was associated with lower reintervention rates and a trend toward improved primary patency and MALEs. Furthermore, for those presenting with occluded prosthetic bypass graft, the use of a DVP was associated with a trend toward lower rates of ALI.

Alternative conduit for infrageniculate bypass in patients with critical limb ischemia

BACKGROUND

Autologous great saphenous vein (GSV) has always been considered the gold standard conduit for infrainguinal revascularization. When GSV is inadequate or unavailable, alternative conduits have been used. In this study, we compared modern outcomes of different conduit types used in lower extremity bypass (LEB) for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

METHODS

The Vascular Study Group of New England database (2003-2014) was queried for patients who underwent infrageniculate bypass originating from the femoral arteries. Conduit types were categorized as single-segment GSV, alternative autologous conduit (AAC), and nonautologous conduit (NAC). Primary outcomes were 1-year freedom from major adverse limb event (MALE), MALE-free survival, and primary graft patency. Multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities.

RESULTS

LEB was performed in 2148 patients, of which 1125 were to below-knee popliteal (BK-Pop) and 1023 to infrapopliteal artery (IPA) targets. The baseline characteristics differed among the conduit groups: Patients in the GSV group were younger and had fewer comorbidities than in the AAC groups. Patients undergoing BK-Pop bypass with NAC had higher rates of postoperative myocardial infarction (7.1%) and postoperative (5.8%) and 1-year death (40.8%) than in those with GSV (3.1%, 2%, and 31.7%, respectively) and AAC (0%, 0%, and 25%, respectively). In multivariable analysis, conduit type did not make a difference in 1-year MALE, MALE-free survival, or primary graft patency for BK-Pop bypasses. For IPA bypasses, NAC use was associated with higher rates of postoperative (6.4%) and in-hospital death (4.5%) compared with GSV (2.5% and 1.4%, respectively) and AAC (2.9% and 1.9%, respectively). In adjusted analysis, NAC was associated with higher risk of MALE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.20; P = .036) and primary patency loss (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.91-1.89), and lower MALE-free survival (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.03-2.09; P = .035) compared with GSV. There was no difference between the NAC and AAC groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Conduit type does not affect outcomes in BK-Pop bypass. In the absence of single-segment GSV, the use of AAC for IPA bypass does not appear to confer any additional benefit of MALE, MALE-free survival, or graft patency compared with prosthetic grafts at 1-year follow-up.