Predisposing factors, management, and prognostic evaluation of acute carotid blowout syndrome

The Clinical Outcome of Carotid Blowout Syndrome Showing Non-bleeding Angiography

OBJECTIVE

Patient with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) may demonstrated non-bleeding digital subtraction angiography (DSA) without identifying pseudoaneurysm or contrast extravasation. Our objective is to evaluate the clinical outcomes for this specific subset of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on 172 CBS patients who received DSA for evaluation of transarterial embolization (TAE) between 2005 and 2022, of whom 19 patients had non-bleeding DSA and did not undergo TAE.

RESULTS

The age (55.2 ± 7.3 vs. 54.8 ± 11.1), male sex (17/19 vs. 135/153), tumor size (5.6 ± 2.4 vs. 5.2 ± 2.2), cancer locations were similar (P > 0.05) between both groups; except for there were more pseudoaneurysm/active bleeding (85.6% vs. 0%) and less vascular irregularity (14.4% vs. 94.7%) in the TAE group (P < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression model adjusting for age, sex, and tumor size, non-bleeding DSA group was independently associated with recurrent bleeding compared to TAE group (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-6.4, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the presence of vascular irregularity was associated with segmental recurrent bleeding (adjusted HR = 8.0, 95% CI 2.7-23.3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patient showing non-bleeding DSA thus not having TAE had higher risk of recurrent bleeding, compared to patient who received TAE. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case Series.

Carotid blowout into the trachea: unusual entity with unexpected management outcome

We present a case report of a patient with a history of aggressive thyroid cancer managed by surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation to the neck. A year later, he presented with hemoptysis. Endobronchial ultrasound showed a pulsatile vessel; however, a CT scan and conventional angiogram were negative. Three days later, a repeat angiogram revealed a pseudoaneurysm arising from the right common carotid artery. Carotid sacrifice was performed after passing balloon test occlusion. Three years later the patient presented with coil herniation into the trachea. The carotid stump was closed with a vascular plug to prevent rebleeding from coil removal. Four months later the patient experienced an intractable cough and underwent laryngoscopy-assisted removal of the residual coil mass. This case report discusses the rare scenario of a carotid blowout into the trachea and the subsequent course of events.

Incidence of Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer after Radiation Therapy: A Cohort Study

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a rare yet life-threatening complication that occurs after radiation therapy (RT). This study aimed to determine the incidence of CBS in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing contemporary RT and to explore potential discrepancies in the risk of CBS between nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and non-NPC patients. A total of 1084 patients with HNC who underwent RT between 2013 and 2023 were included in the study. All patients were under regular follow-ups at the radio-oncology department, and underwent annual contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging for cancer recurrence surveillance. Experienced neuroradiologists and vascular neurologists reviewed the recruited patients' images. Patients were further referred to the neurology department for radiation vasculopathy evaluation. The primary outcome of this study was CBS. Patients were categorized into NPC and non-NPC groups and survival analysis was employed to compare the CBS risk between the two groups. A review of the literature on CBS incidence was also conducted. Among the enrolled patients, the incidence of CBS in the HNC, NPC, and non-NPC groups was 0.8%, 0.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between the NPC and non-NPC groups (p = 0.34). Combining the findings for our cohort with those of previous studies revealed that the cumulative incidence of CBS in patients with HNC is 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after both surgery and RT, 4% (95% CI = 2-6%) after surgery alone, and 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after RT alone. Our findings indicate a low incidence of CBS in patients with HNC undergoing contemporary RT. Patients with NPC may have a CBS risk close to that of non-NPC patients. However, the low incidence of CBS could be a potentially cause of selection bias and underestimation bias.

Clinical aspects of oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in South and Southeast Asia

BACKGROUND

Oral cancer and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMD) are major health problems in South and Southeast Asia.

AIMS

To describe and discuss the clinical aspects of Oral Cancer and OPMD in South and Southeast Asia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review of concepts and data over the last four decades.

DISCUSSION

Asian countries account for about two-thirds of new cases of oral cancer (OC) globally, with the highest burden in the South and Southeast Asian countries, including Pakistan and India. Habits, dietary patterns, socioeconomic status, and access to routine dental care play a crucial role in defining the demographics and clinical presentation of OC in these regions and significantly influence the morbidity and mortality of the disease. This region sees the use of different types of tobacco with or without areca nut (AN), such as pan masala, gutka, gul, snuff, mawa, and mishri. Tobacco use is high among men in Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Maldives, Bangladesh, Nepal, India and Bhutan. Areca nut is the fourth most common addictive substance globally and is frequently used in South and Southeast Asian countries, including Southeast China, Hainan Island, India, Taiwan, and the Pacific Islands, and immigrants from these regions in Africa, Europe, and North America. The use of these products results in mucosal alterations with varied clinical presentation of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs) and OC. We discuss here the different types of OPMD and OC, the diagnostic aids and their relevance in clinical practice, and factors that influence their prognosis.

Brain abscesses following carotid blowout syndrome: a case report

We report a case of intracranial abscesses development in a patient with head and neck cancer after emergent treatment of carotid blowout syndrome with coil embolization. Our patient is a 60-year-old male who presented with hemoptysis and hematemesis, which raised concerns for impending carotid blowout syndrome. Endovascular occlusion was successfully achieved, and the patient was discharged in stable condition. Ten days later, the patient reported headaches and right facial pain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple intracranial abscesses. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were administered, leading to a variable response with some abscesses decreasing in size and others increasing. Seven weeks from discharge, the patient had no neurological deficits, and all abscesses had decreased in size.

Outcomes Following Treatment for Carotid Blowout in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine outcomes after interventional radiology treatment of carotid blowout.

METHODS

Patients with head and neck cancer and who received interventional radiology treatment for carotid blowout between 2000 and 2022 were included. Pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment variables were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients met inclusion criteria. Eleven patients (78.6%) had a history of radiation. Twelve (85.7%) blowouts occurred within 6 months of recent intervention. Initial treatment was with stenting (n = 9, 64.3%), coil embolization (n = 4, 28.6%), or both (n = 1, 7.1%). Six patients (42.9%) underwent subsequent carotid bypass. Morbidity following treatment included stroke (n = 1) and rebleeding (n = 4). Six-month survival was 57.1%. Of the patients who survived past six months, 5/8 were treated with carotid bypass and coverage. Four patients died of cancer progression, three of rebleeding, and three of medical complications.

CONCLUSION

The majority of carotid blowout occurs within 6 months of surgery or radiation. Many who survive will die of cancer progression or medical illness. Carotid bypass with flap coverage may be a worthwhile treatment for carotid blowout and should be considered as an adjunct to endovascular treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:695-700, 2024.

Surgical treatment of carotid blowout syndrome after radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors: a single-center experience

To explore the treatments for and manifestations of carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) and to further explore the critical role of high-flow bypass combined with parent artery isolation. The clinical data of nine patients with radiotherapy-related CBS who were admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Relevant literature was reviewed. From March 2020 to March 2023, nine CBS patients were admitted to Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, including eight males and one female. Digital subtraction angiography was performed for all the patients; all the pseudoaneurysms were located at the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery. A balloon occlusion test was performed on four patients, which was tolerated by all patients. CT and MRI scans showed seven cases of osteonecrosis combined with infection and two cases of tumor recurrence. Emergency permanent parent artery occlusion was performed on six patients, aneurysm embolization was completed in one case, covered stent implantation was performed in one patient, and three cases were treated by cerebral bypass surgery (including two patients with failed interventional treatment). Rebleeding was found in two patients, and no rebleeding was found in the bypass group. Paralysis was found in three patients, and asymptomatic cerebral infarction without permanent neurologic impairment was found in three patients. Two patients died due to tumor progression. Emergency occlusion surgery is lifesaving in the acute phase of CBS. Endovascular therapy cannot prevent the progression of pseudoaneurysms or lower the recurrence rate of bleeding events. High-flow bypass combined with parent artery isolation is a safe and effective method that may facilitate further surgical treatment. Further research is warranted.

The Extent of Tumor Invasion and Therapeutic Embolization Are Associated with Recurrent Hemorrhage in Patients with External Carotid Artery Blowout Syndrome

PURPOSE

To explore the optimal strategies of therapeutic embolization for patients with carotid blowout syndrome in the external carotid artery (ECA), who may also present with arterial tumor invasion or necrosis extending to the internal carotid artery (ICA) or common carotid artery (CCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 110 patients with ECA blowout between 2005 and 2022. Antecedent cross-sectional imaging features were examined, including tumor size, extent of arterial invasion, and air-containing necrosis. Patients were divided into Groups 1 (n = 53, simultaneous ICA/CCA invasion + ECA therapeutic embolization), 2 (n = 18, simultaneous ICA/CCA invasion + ECA-ICA/CCA therapeutic embolization), and 3 (n = 39, no ICA/CCA invasion + ECA therapeutic embolization). Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations of clinical, imaging, and therapeutic embolization characteristics with recurrent bleeding.

RESULTS

Multivariable Cox regression revealed that Group 1 was independently associated with a higher risk of recurrent bleeding than that in Group 2 (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.7‒23.4; P = .005) and Group 3 (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.8‒8.3; P = .001). In the subgroup with simultaneous ICA/CCA invasion, air-containing necrosis around the ICA/CCA was independently associated with recurrent bleeding after therapeutic embolization of the ECA (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8‒13.6; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ECA blowout treated with therapeutic embolization, there was a lower risk of recurrent bleeding when the extents of arterial invasion and therapeutic embolization were concordant. Air-containing necrosis around the ICA/CCA was associated with recurrent bleeding, so extensive therapeutic embolization to the ICA/CCA should be evaluated in such patients.

A Treatment Approach for Carotid Blowout Syndrome and Soft Tissue Reconstruction after Radiotherapy in Patients with Oral Cancer: A Report of 2 Cases

BACKGROUND

This retrospective case series study aims to demonstrate a salvage technique for the treatment of carotid blow-out syndrome (CBS) in irradiated head and neck cancer patients with a vessel-depleted neck.

METHODS

Between October 2017 and October 2021, two patients (N = 2) with CBS were treated at our institution in a multidisciplinary approach together with the Department of Vascular Surgery. Patients were characterized based on diagnoses, treatment procedures, and the subsequent postoperative course.

RESULTS

Surgical emergency intervention was performed in both cases. The transition zone from the common carotid artery (CCA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA) was resected and reconstructed with a xenogic (case 1) or autogenic (case 2) interposition (end-to-end anastomosis). To allow reconstruction of the vascular defect, an additional autologous vein graft was anastomosed to the interposition graft in an end-to-side technique, allowing arterial anastomosis for a free microvascular flap without re-clamping of the ICA. Because of the intraoperative ICA reconstruction, none of the patients suffered a neurological deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

The techniques presented in the form of two case reports allow for acute bleeding control, cerebral perfusion, and the creation of a vascular anastomosis option in the vessel-depleted neck.

Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Management of Patients At Risk for CBS

OBJECTIVES

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an acute, rare life-threatening hemorrhage that occurs in patients with a history of head and neck cancer and radiation therapy. The primary objective of this review was to identify risk factors and assess treatment and survival outcomes following CBS.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature was performed. Information including risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of CBS were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 49 articles and 2220 patients were included in the systematic review. Risk factors for developing CBS included a history of radiation therapy, wound complications, and advanced tumor stage. The initial management of CBS included establishing a stable airway, gaining hemostasis, and repletion of blood loss. Endovascular and surgical procedures treat CBS with infrequent rates of rebleeding and periprocedural complications. Short-term survival following treatment of CBS shows high survival rates when considering CBS-related complications and underlying disease, however, long-term survival related to the underlying disease demonstrated high mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying patients at risk for CBS enables practitioners to counsel patients on life-saving interventions and expected outcomes following treatment of CBS. Treatment of CBS is associated with high short-term survival, although long-term survival related to underlying disease is low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 133:576-587, 2023.

Head and Neck Reconstruction With 2-Stage External Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Transfer

BACKGROUND

In head and neck surgery cases where skin is severely scarred or adhered to surrounding tissue, reconstruction can be difficult to perform using microsurgical tissue or conventional pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) transfer given the risks, which include damage to major vessels when manipulating scarred skin. For such cases, we perform a 2-stage external PMMF transfer, whereby the PMMF is directly sutured to the defect over the neck skin (without manipulation the hardened skin), and the flap division is then performed secondarily.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients who had histories of radiotherapy (60-70 Gy) and prior neck dissection received the 2-stage external PMMF transfer procedure. Indications for the flaps included pharyngeal fistula closure in 12 patients, reconstruction for mandibular necrosis after radiotherapy in 8 patients, salvage surgery for partial or total necrosis of the free flap in 4 patients, and simultaneous reconstruction after tumor excision in 6 patients. Two patients underwent a second external PMMF transfer from the contralateral side because of postoperative complications, yielding a total of 32 flap transfers.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine flaps showed complete flap survival, whereas 3 had partial necrosis. Other complications, despite complete flap survival, included large fistulas requiring additional surgery for fistula closure (1 patient) and small fistulas that were closed without requiring reoperation (7 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

External PMMF transfer offers a safe, simple, and effective option in cases where free flap surgery is considered difficult or the risks associated with neck manipulation are high.

Risk factors for rebleeding and long-term outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer bleeding: a multicenter study

Background

Acute, catastrophic bleeding in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is challenging and also a burden for their families and frontline physicians. This study analyzed the risk factors for rebleeding and long-term outcomes in these patients with HNC.

Methods

Patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with HNC bleeding were enrolled in this study (N = 231). Variables of patients with or without rebleeding were compared, and associated factors were investigated using Cox’s proportional hazard model.

Results

Of the 231 patients enrolled, 112 (48.5%) experienced a recurrent bleeding event. The cumulative rebleeding incidence rate was 23% at 30 days, 49% at 180 days, and 56% at 1 year. Multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that overweight-to-obesity (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.98, p = 0.043), laryngeal cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–4.23, p = 0.031), chemoradiation (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.001–2.94, p = 0.049), and second primary cancer (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.13–2.70, p = 0.012) are significant independent predictors of rebleeding, and the prognostic factors for overall survival included underweight (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.22–2.93, p = 0.004), heart rate > 110 beats/min (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.04–2.39, p = 0.032), chemoradiation (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.18–4.52, p = 0.015), and local recurrence (HR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.14–2.67, p = 0.011).

Conclusions

Overweight-to-obesity is a protective factor, while laryngeal cancer, chemoradiation and a second primary cancer are risk factors for rebleeding in patients with HNC. Our results may assist physicians in risk stratification of patients with HNC bleeding.

Management of Double Carotid Blow Out with Definitive Repair After Temporizing Stent Graft Placement

Carotid blowout syndrome is a life-threatening complication for patients with head and neck cancer. Temporizing stent graft procedures improve short-term survival and can be the definitive treatment for various reasons, including a poor oncologic prognosis, unsuitability for definitive reconstruction, or a lack of operative options. A second carotid blowout will often be fatal. Preventing such events requires multidisciplinary strategic planning because of a hostile reoperative field. We have described a case of a 44-year-old man with a history of laryngeal cancer who had experienced a carotid blowout. Treated with a stent graft, the patient had experienced a second event 6 weeks later. Treatment involved excision and suture ligation with rotational muscle flap coverage.

Carotid blowout syndrome caused by chronic infection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) refers to rupture of the extracranial carotid artery and its branches; as a severe complication, it usually occurs after surgery or radiotherapy for malignant tumours of the head and neck. We present a case of CBS caused by chronic infection of the external carotid artery (ECA). In this case, we did not find any evidence of head and neck tumours.

CASE SUMMARY

A 42-year-old man was referred to the Emergency Department with a complaint of a lump found on the left side of his neck with pain and fever for 4 d. We diagnosed the condition as neck infection with abscess formation based on physical examination, routine blood examination, ultrasound examination and plain computed tomography (CT) and decided to perform emergency surgery. During the operation, 30 mL of grey and smelly pus was drained from the deep surface of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The second day after the operation, the patient suddenly exhibited a large amount of haemoptysis and incision bleeding. The enhanced CT showed distal occlusion of the left ECA and irregular thickening of the broken ends of the artery encased in an uneven enhancement of soft tissue density. Infected ECA occlusion and rupture were considered. The patient was transferred to a vascular unit for transcatheter ECA embolization and recovered well.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons need to pay attention to vascular lesions caused by chronic infection that may develop into acute CBS.

Recurrent Carotid artery blow out in a head & neck patient

Introduction and importance

Carotid artery blowout syndrome is a rare complication of head and neck cancer treatment. It defines a rupture of the carotid artery wall through vessel wall necrosis. This is typically precipitated by radiotherapy, direct tumour invasion, or a combination of these factors. We describe a rare case of three consecutive carotid artery blowouts in a head and neck cancer patient.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old man with a history of T3NO hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with chemotherapy and radiation presented with a four-month history of progressive dysphagia and right sided neck pain. Flexible nasendoscopy revealed laryngeal oedema and slough. A panendoscopy and biopsy showed no evidence of tumour recurrence. The patient was discharged and represented with worsening dyspnoea. He subsequently experienced a large volume hemorrhage necessitating ligation of his right external carotid artery. He underwent pharyngolaryngectomy indicated due to the extent of laryngeal radiation necrosis. Thereafter he suffered two additional acute carotid bleeds from his right common carotid necessitating ligation in theatre.

Clinical discussion and conclusion

This case report illustrates the key issues to be considered in patients with locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and subsequent management of acute carotid blowout syndrome, which without prompt management, can be fatal.

•

Carotid artery rupture, or blowout, has a high morbidity and mortality.

•

Carotid blowout is a rare consequence of head and neck cancer treatment.

•

Radiotherapy is the main predisposing risk factor.

•

Acute carotid blowout requires prompt resuscitation and bleeding source control.

•

Definitive treatment includes endovascular occlusion, stenting or surgical ligation.

Carotid Blowout Syndrome in the Emergency Department: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an infrequent but dangerous oncologic emergency that must be recognized due to a mortality rate that approaches 40% and neurologic morbidity that approaches 60%. Patients present with a variety of symptoms ranging from asymptomatic to frank hemorrhage, and appropriate recognition and management may improve their outcomes.

CASE REPORT

A man in his late 60s with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx presented to the emergency department (ED) with hemoptysis and several episodes of post-tussive emesis with large clots. He had been cancer free for multiple years after treatment with chemotherapy and radiation to the neck. Evaluation revealed a necrotic tumor on the posterior pharynx on bedside laryngoscopy and an external carotid pseudoaneurysm that was stented by interventional radiology. The patient experienced recurrent hemorrhage several months later and opted for palliative measures and expired of massive hemorrhage in the ED on a subsequent visit. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: CBS can be fatal, and early suspicion and recognition are key to ensure that a threatened or impending carotid blowout are appropriately managed. Once carotid blowout is suspected, early resuscitation and consultation with interventional radiology and vascular surgery is warranted.

In-Hospital and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Bleeding

Background and Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) bleeding and to analyze the risk factors for mortality. Materials and Methods: We included patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with HNC bleeding. Variables of patients who survived and died were compared and associated factors were investigated by logistic regression and Cox’s proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 125 patients were enrolled in the present study. Fifty-nine (52.8%) patients experienced a recurrent bleeding event. The in-hospital mortality rate was 16%. The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 48%, 41% and 34%, respectively. The median survival time was 9.2 months. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that risk factors for in-hospital mortality were inotropic support (OR = 10.41; Cl 1.81–59.84; p = 0.009), hypopharyngeal cancer (OR = 4.32; Cl 1.29–14.46; p = 0.018), and M stage (OR = 5.90; Cl 1.07–32.70; p = 0.042). Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicate that heart rate >110 (beats/min) (HR = 2.02; Cl 1.16–3.51; p = 0.013), inotropic support (HR = 3.25; Cl 1.20–8.82; p = 0.021), and hypopharygneal cancer (HR = 2.22; Cl 1.21–4.06; p = 0.010) were all significant independent predictors of poorer overall survival. Conclusions: HNC bleeding commonly represents the advanced disease stage. Recognition of associated factors aids in the risk stratification of patients with HNC bleeding.

Carotid blowout syndrome: endovascular management of a lesser known oncological emergency: case report

Background

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) refers to a fatal hemorrhagic complication of cervical carotid arteries that occurs due to rupture of the extracranial carotid artery or one of its major branches in patients treated for head and neck malignancy. In this article, we will discuss two different spectrum of CBS and endovascular approach.

Case presentation

Two cases of per oral bleeding presented in the emergency department. After patients were hemodynamically stabilized, CT angiography was done which showed type II CBS and type III CBS, respectively. This was followed by transfemoral supra-aortic digital subtraction angiogram coil embolization with scaffolding and anchoring technique, respectively, for the patients.

Conclusions

Early recognition of the predictors of CBS by a multidisciplinary team is critical. The endovascular treatment approach is relatively safe and effective with low rates of morbidity and mortality compared to surgical approach in CBS.

Lymph Node Dissection: Principles and Postoperative Imaging

The management of neck nodes in head and neck cancer is critical, given a markedly increased poor prognosis in patients with nodal metastasis. The surgical management of neck nodes has undergone radical changes secondary to a paradigm shift from curative surgery to nonsurgical organ and function-preserving options, such as radiation therapy. In the neck after treatment, radiologists should be familiar with imaging findings in various types of neck dissections and post-chemoradiation changes, along with signs of residual or recurrent disease. A multidisciplinary approach is essential with well-designed evidence-based surveillance imaging protocols and standardized reporting.

Extracranial/Intracranial Vascular Bypass in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer - Related Carotid Blowout Syndrome

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

To investigate the endovascular intervention or extracranial/intracranial (EC/IC) vascular bypass in the management of patients with head and neck cancer-related carotid blowout syndrome (CBS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical data of patients with head and neck cancer-related CBS treated by endovascular intervention and/or EC/IC vascular bypass, analysis of its bleeding control, neurological complications, and survival results.

RESULTS

Thrity-seven patients were included. Twenty-five were associated with external carotid artery (ECA); twelve were associated with internal or common carotid artery (ICA/CCA). All patients with ECA hemorrhage were treated with endovascular embolization. Of the 12 patients with ICA/CCA hemorrhage, 9 underwent EC/IC bypass, 1 underwent endovascular embolization, and 3 underwent endovascular stenting. For patients with ECA-related CBS, the median survival was 6 months, and the 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were 67.1%, 44.7%, and 33.6%, respectively; the estimated rebleeding risk at 1-month, 6-month, and 2-year was 7.1%, 20.0%, and 31.6%, respectively. For patients with ICA/CCA-related CBS, the median survival was 22.5 months, and the 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were 92.3%, 71.8%, and 41.0%, respectively; the estimated rebleeding risk at 1 month, 6 months, and 2 years is 7.7%,15.4%, and 15.4%, respectively. ICA/CCA-related CBS patients have significantly longer survival time and lower risk of rebleeding, which may be related to the more use of EC/IC vascular bypass as a definite treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with ICA/CCA-related CBS, if there is more stable hemodynamics, longer expected survival, EC/IC vascular bypass is preferred.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:1548-1556, 2021.

Embolization for Carotid Blowout in Head and Neck Cancer: Case Report of Five Patients

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is defined as a rupture of common carotid artery or its branches. Endovascular intervention has been advocated as first line of treatment for CBS. This Case Report describes 5 patients with prior history of head and neck cancer who presented with CBS. Two patients presented as acute, 2 as impending, and one as threatened CBS. The lesions found were pseudoaneurysm and focal vascular irregularities involving the common carotid artery, cervical internal carotid artery and lingual artery. Embolization and occlusion with detachable coils of the artery was used in all patients. Technical success and immediate hemostasis were achieved in all patients. One patient presented transient cranial nerve palsy. No recurrent CBS was reported during the follow-up. In our experience, coil embolization, if possible, is a safe and efficient technique in treatment of CBS secondary to head and neck cancers.

Transarterial Embolization for Bleeding in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Who Benefits?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of transarterial embolization (TAE) for bleeding in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and to evaluate the prognostic factors after TAE.

STUDY DESIGN

Outcome study.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 31 consecutive patients (27 men and 4 women; median age, 61 years) who presented uncontrollable hemorrhage associated with HNC and underwent emergency TAE at our institution during a 10-year period (January 2011-December 2020). This corresponded to 40 TAE procedures, including 27 cases with an unstable status (circulatory and/or respiratory insufficiency) and 10 cases with carotid blowout syndrome. The technical success rate and adverse events were analyzed on a per-procedure basis. The rebleeding and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed on a per-patient basis, and the factors related to OS were evaluated.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. As an adverse event, cerebral infarction was found in three cases with carotid blowout syndrome. The rebleeding rate at 30 days after TAE and in the follow-up period (range, 9-3,004 days) was 17.2% and 35.5%, respectively. The median survival time was 263 days (95% confidence interval: 124.0-402.0 days). In the log-rank test, complete remission (CR) of the primary cancer at the time of the first TAE was identified as a significant influencing factor of survival.

CONCLUSION

TAE is effective for the treatment of hemorrhage associated with HNC even in patients with an unstable status. Patients with CR can gain a long life span.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Clinical efficacy of bypass grafting in recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with internal carotid artery invasion

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of bypass grafting in recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with internal carotid artery invasion.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed involving 51 patients either operated by bypass grafting (n = 22) or treated with repeated chemo-radiotherapy (n = 29).

RESULTS

Four patients in the bypass grafting group died 3-5 months after the operation due to epistaxis and pulmonary infection (4/22, 18.2%), and three more patients exhibited a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥ 2 during the follow-up (3/22, 13.6%). In the repeated chemo-radiotherapy group, 8 patients died (8/29, 27.6%), including seven patients dying within 2-3 months due to epistaxis and pulmonary infection (7/29, 24.1%). One more patient died of epistaxis after 9 months. The difference in mortality between the two treatment groups within 3 months of treatment was statistically significant (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebrovascular reconstruction after detailed collateral flow assessment is an effective treatment for recurrent NPC patients with internal carotid artery invasion.

Extracranial vertebral artery to middle cerebral artery bypass in therapeutic internal carotid artery occlusion for epipharyngeal carcinoma: A technical case report

Background:

Vertebral artery (VA) to middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass is a rarely selected technique because a complex expanded dissection is required, and often, a better donor artery than VA exists. A good indication for VA-MCA bypass is the treatment of head-and-neck malignancies with the sacrifice of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or for carotid artery rupture.

Methods:

A 23-year-old man with epipharyngeal carcinoma, treated by ligating the carotid artery with a VAMCA bypass before chemoradiotherapy, was reported. Radiographic findings showed that the bone of the carotid canal was dissolved, and the right ICA was engulfed by the tumor. As epipharyngeal carcinoma is hypersensitive to radiation, in cases where the tumor rapidly disappears, ICA may dangle in the pharynx and rupture may occur. In addition, to irradiate sufficiently, the ICA may become an obstacle. Hence, we decided to perform carotid ligation with a VA-MCA bypass before radiation and chemotherapy for the primary lesion. We selected the V3 portion of the VA as the donor on the ipsilateral side, as it can supply high-flow cerebral blood flow, which is not influenced by carcinoma and less influenced by irradiation for the epipharynx.

Results:

The VA-MCA bypass was completed without complications followed by endovascular occlusion of the ICA. Induction chemotherapy was initiated for the patient 2 weeks after surgery. The patient achieved a complete response following chemoradiotherapy.

Conclusion:

ICA ligation with VA-MCA high-flow bypass earlier than chemoradiotherapy is useful for epipharyngeal carcinoma as it prevents carotid artery rupture and allows radical intervention.

Risk factors and nomogram for predicting carotid blowout syndrome based on computed tomography angiography

OBJECTIVES

To identify independent factors for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) and construct a nomogram to predict risk of CBS preoperatively based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

From January 2010 to July 2020, 73 HNC patients who had surgery in hospitalization and underwent CTA examination for head and neck region were included in this study. Vascular alterations and the relationship between carotid artery (CA) and tumor were evaluated in CTA. Clinical and CTA imaging features were distinguished by logistic regression analysis and used to perform receiver operating curve analysis. Nomogram was created to predict risk of CBS and assessed by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve.

RESULTS

Three independent risk factors were identified, including radical neck dissection, CA surrounded by tumor, and CA invaded by tumor without clear boundary. Area under curve of the combination of 3 variables was 0.836 (95% CI, 0.72-0.952, p < 0.001). The C-index of nomogram was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94), and the calibration plot showed a good fitting between prediction and observation.

CONCLUSIONS

We established a useful nomogram based on CTA imaging, which showed a satisfied efficacy for evaluating risk of CBS in HNC patients preoperatively.

Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Internal Carotid Artery Blowout Syndrome Caused by Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a treatment strategy for internal carotid artery blowout syndrome caused by nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a case series was performed.

SETTING

Carotid blowout syndrome is a catastrophic complication caused by malignant tumor of the skull base.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis based on 69 patients with internal carotid artery blowout syndrome admitted to our center between April 2018 and January 2020 was performed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: an EBBA (internal carotid artery embolization + bypass based on American Society of Intervention and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology [ASITN/SIR]) group and an embolization/stent group. The follow-up time was 6 to 9 months.

RESULTS

In the EBBA group, 41 patients (41/49, 83.7%) survived. Forty patients had a satisfactory quality of life after 3 months. No death occurred within 3 months. Nonoperative death occurred in 8 cases (8/49, 16.3%). The rate of mortality and disability was 18.4% (9/49). In the embolization/stent group, 16 patients (16/20, 80%) survived. Nonoperative death occurred in 4 cases (4/20, 20%), 3 of which occurred within 1 to 3 months. Four cases reported Modified Rankin Scale ≥2 after 3 months. The rate of mortality and disability was 40% (8/20).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive revascularization strategy for internal carotid artery (ICA) embolization and intracranial and extracranial bypass grafting based on ASITN/SIR score for ICA blowout syndrome patients not only can prolong the patient survival but also greatly improve the survival probability and quality of life as well as reduce their rate of mortality or disability.

Carotid Blowout Management in the Endovascular Era

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a potential complication of head and neck cancer, and its therapy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in endovascular techniques have improved patient outcomes. In this study, we report outcomes of emergent endovascular intervention for CBS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained neurovascular database and identified 38 consecutive endovascular procedures for CBS from 2008-2019 at our institution. Data collection was performed on patient demographics, type of cancer, previous cancer treatments, type of CBS, location of bleed, diagnostic workup, endovascular treatment, and procedural outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 38 consecutive endovascular procedures for CBS were performed from 2008-2019 at our single academic institution. Technical success was achieved in 100% of endovascular procedures. Procedural stroke occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, procedural mortality occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, recurrent CBS occurred in 4 (10.5%) procedures, and fatal rehemorrhage occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure. Regarding secondary outcomes, delayed stroke/transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, whereas there were no cases of delayed infectious complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The endovascular treatment of CBS is safe and effective with relatively low rates of morbidity and mortality compared with other currently available treatment modalities. However, the overall rate of complications demands attention and sheds light on the need for further improvement in management.

Multistep and Multidisciplinary Management for Post-irradiated Carotid Blowout Syndrome in a Young Patient With Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome is a severe complication of head and neck cancer, associated with high mortality and morbidity.

METHODS

We present a case of acute hemorrhage from the carotid artery of a 59-year-old man with a history of chemoradiotherapy for lingual base and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The case was managed by a staged multidisciplinary approach of open arterial reconstruction, after initial endovascular hemorrhage control using stent graft.

RESULTS

The patient was discharged to home with patent carotid artery, no sign of infection or bleeding, and autonomous ambulation. A CT/PET scan performed 6 months later confirmed healing and absence of tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach involving vascular surgeons, ENT surgeons, plastic and maxillofacial surgeons is particularly appropriate in the management of carotid blowout syndrome to warrant a durable and effective repair of all the anatomical structures involved.

Transcarotid Mechanical Thrombectomy for Embolic Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion after Endovascular Deconstructice Embolization for Carotid Blowout Syndrome

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a fatal complication of head and neck cancer. Endovascular treatment, particularly deconstructive embolization, is effective for CBS, but it might result in thromboembolic events. We report the case of a 57-year-old man with underlying recurrent head and neck cancer who had CBS. The patient received endovascular embolization of the right internal, external, and common carotid arteries. Right internal carotid artery to middle cerebral artery embolic occlusion was noted immediately after the procedure, and left-sided weakness and facial palsy were found. Ipsilateral suprabulbar cervical internal carotid artery puncture was performed under fluoroscopic guidance, and rescue suction thrombectomy was successful. The patient had no significant neurological sequela. Transcarotid intraarterial thrombectomy is a reasonable method for managing postembolization large vessel occlusion, even in the neck, after irradiation.

Intervening in the Acute Phase of Postradiation Carotid Blowout Syndrome

Introduction  Acute carotid blowout syndrome (aCBS) is a severe complication of head and neck cancer (HNC). It can be defined as a rupture of the extracranial carotid arteries, or one of their branches, that causes life-threatening hemorrhage, and which nowadays can be treated with urgent endovascular intervention.

Objective  We retrospectively evaluate the endovascular management of aCBS and its outcome in years of survival.

Methods  Retrospectively, we describe our experience with endovascular control of aCBS in patients treated for HNC. We review the characteristics, pathology, endovascular treatment and morbidity and assess the gain in life years.

Results  Nine individuals were included in this study. Four patients had been previously diagnosed with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), one with paranasal SCC, one with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and three with oral or maxillary adenocarcinoma. All subjects underwent radiotherapy and surgical excision to different extents. Twelve endovascular procedures were performed for injuries to the internal carotid artery ( n  = 3; 25%), external carotid artery ( n  = 1; 7%) or one of their branches ( n  = 8; 67%). Deconstructive methods were used in nine procedures, and three procedures were mainly reconstructive with deployment of covered stents. Total control of bleeding was achieved in all individuals with no intraprocedural complications.

Conclusion  Endovascular therapy is an effective alternative for the management of exsanguinating CBS. In our series, this palliative therapy increased the overall patient survival by an estimated 9 months.

Carotid blowout syndrome: modern trends in management

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) refers to rupture of the carotid artery and is an uncommon complication of head and neck cancer that can be rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis and intervention. CBS develops when a damaged arterial wall cannot sustain its integrity against the patient’s blood pressure, mainly in patients who have undergone surgical procedures and radiotherapy due to cancer of the head and neck, or have been reirradiated for a recurrent or second primary tumor in the neck. Among patients irradiated prior to surgery, CBS is usually a result of wound breakdown, pharyngocutaneous fistula and infection. This complication has often been fatal in the past, but at the present time, early diagnosis and modern technology applied to its management have decreased morbidity and mortality rates. In addition to analysis of the causes and consequences of CBS, the purpose of this paper is to critically review methods for early diagnosis of this complication and establish individualized treatment based on endovascular procedures for each patient.

Verification of bleeding points in carotid blowout syndrome using guidewire manipulation

PURPOSE

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a catastrophic complication of aggressive treatment of head and neck cancer. Early detection of bleeding points with embolization is a life-saving procedure; however, some bleeding points may be difficult to identify. Our aim was to determine whether guidewire manipulation (GWM) could be used to verify bleeding point locations in patients with CBS.

METHODS

Of the 92 patients with CBS referred for embolization in a 5-year period, 14 men and one woman (mean age 58 years) had bleeding points at locations that could not be definitely determined. We used GWM to verify the presence of these bleeding points. We assessed the anatomy of the ruptured arteries, technical details of GWM, and the angiographic and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Bleeding points were difficult to detect because of the presence of small arterial pouches (n = 6) or multiple small arterial pouches (n = 9) in the unilateral or bilateral carotid arteries. Bleeding point locations were accurately identified using GWM in the internal carotid artery (n = 7), carotid bulb (n = 4), or common carotid artery (n = 4). Balloon-assisted GWM was applied in one patient. Fiber coils (n = 15) and/or liquid adhesives (n = 2) were used to occlude the affected artery. Endovascular management was technically successful in all patients and resulted in immediate cessation of hemorrhage without recurrence in a mean 22-month clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

GWM is a simple and effective method for verifying bleeding points in ruptured arteries and preventing erroneous occlusion by embolization.

Outcome of carotid and subclavian blowout syndrome in patients with pharynx- and larynx carcinoma passing a standardized multidisciplinary treatment

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is one of the most feared emergencies in the head and neck surgery and tends to occur in patients with head and neck cancer, wound complications, pharyngocutaneous fistulas, or after radio(chemo)therapy. CBS is always life threatening and associated with a 50% mortality/morbidity rate.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2015, a total of 51 patients who developed CBS caused by the tumour masses or after radio(chemo)therapy were included. All patients underwent a standardised bleeding management.

RESULTS

In 86% of patients, CBS was associated with manifest carcinoma. Fifty three percent of patients were treated by transcervical surgery, in 36% of these cases surgery was supplemented by endovascular approaches. Severe complications such as re-bleeding or cerebral ischemia occurred infrequently. Seven patients died because of the acute bleeding.

CONCLUSION

CBS associated with head and neck cancer carries poor mid and long-term prognoses. An interdisciplinary standardised treatment path dramatically reduced overall morbidity and mortality.

Contemporary management of carotid blowout syndrome utilizing endovascular techniques

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To illustrate complex interdisciplinary decision making and the utility of modern endovascular techniques in the management of patients with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS).

STUDY DESIGNS

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Patients treated with endovascular strategies and/or surgical modalities were included. Control of hemorrhage, neurological, and survival outcomes were studied.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2014, 33 patients had 38 hemorrhagic events related to head and neck cancer that were managed with endovascular means. Of these, 23 were localized to the external carotid artery (ECA) branches and five localized to the ECA main trunk; nine were related to the common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA), and one event was related to the innominate artery. Seven events related to the CCA/ICA or innominate artery were managed with endovascular sacrifice, whereas three cases were managed with a flow-preserving approach (covered stent). Only one patient developed permanent hemiparesis. In two of the three cases where the flow-preserving approach was used, the covered stent eventually became exposed via the overlying soft tissue defect, and definitive management using carotid revascularization or resection was employed to prevent further hemorrhage. In cases of soft tissue necrosis, vascularized tissues were used to cover the great vessels as applicable.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of modern endovascular approaches for management of acute CBS yields optimal results and should be employed in a coordinated manner by the head and neck surgeon and the neurointerventionalist.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 2016 127:383-390, 2017.

Outcomes of interventions for carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes of a patient cohort undergoing intervention for carotid blowout syndrome associated with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Patients with head and neck cancer who presented with carotid distribution bleeding from 2000 to 2014 were identified in the medical record. Primary outcomes were short- and midterm mortality and recurrent bleeding. Standard statistical methods and survival analysis were used to analyze study population characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.1 ± 11.4 years (74% male). All malignancies were squamous cell type, stage IV, in a variety of primary locations: 32% oral cavity, 24% larynx, 16% superficial neck, with the remainder in the oropharynx, nasopharynx, and hypopharynx. Fifty-one percent of bleeds were of common carotid, 29% external carotid, and 19% internal carotid origin. Among the patients, 68% presented with acute hemorrhage, 24% with impending bleed, and 8% with threatened bleed. All patients underwent intervention: 38% received endovascular coil embolization, 30% stent grafts, 22% surgical ligation, and 10% primary vessel repair or bypass grafting. Although major complications were rare, 10.8% of patients had perioperative stroke. Sixteen recurrent bleeding episodes involving 12 arteries occurred in 11 patients (29.73%). Median rebleeding time was 7 days (interquartile range, 6-49). Estimated recurrent bleeding risk at 30 days and 6 months was 24% and 34%, respectively. Of the patients, 91.9% survived to hospital discharge. The 90-day and 1-year estimated survivals were 60.9% and 36.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid blowout syndrome associated with head and neck cancer carries poor mid- and long-term prognoses; however, mortality may be related more to the advanced stage of disease rather than carotid involvement or associated intervention. Both surgical and endovascular approaches may be efficacious in cases of acute hemorrhage but carry a significant risk of periprocedural stroke and recurrent bleeding.

Endovascular Management of Post-Irradiated Carotid Blowout Syndrome

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the clinical and technical factors related to the outcomes of endovascular management in patients with head-and-neck cancers associated with post-irradiated carotid blowout syndrome (PCBS).

Materials and Methods

Between 2000 and 2013, 96 patients with PCBS underwent endovascular management. The 40 patients with the pathological lesions located in the external carotid artery were classified as group 1 and were treated with embolization. The other 56 patients with the pathological lesions located in the trunk of the carotid artery were divided into 2 groups as follows: group 2A comprised the 38 patients treated with embolization, and group 2B comprised the 18 patients treated with stent-graft placement. Fisher’s exact test was used to examine endovascular methods, clinical severities, and postprocedural clinical diseases as predictors of outcomes.

Results

Technical success and immediate hemostasis were achieved in all patients. The results according to endovascular methods (group 1 vs 2A vs 2B) were as follows: technical complication (1/40[2.5%] vs 9/38[23.7%] vs 9/18[50.0%], P = 0.0001); rebleeding (14/40[35.0%] vs 5/38[13.2%] vs 7/18[38.9%]), P = 0.0435). The results according to clinical severity (acute vs ongoing PCBS) were as follows: technical complication (15/47[31.9%] vs 4/49[8.2%], P = 0.0035); rebleeding (18/47[38.3%] vs 8/49[16.3%], P = 0.0155). The results according to post-procedural clinical disease (regressive vs progressive change) were as follows: alive (14/21[66.7%] vs 8/75[10.7%], P<0.0001); survival time (34.1±30.6[0.3–110] vs 3.6±4.0[0.07–22] months, P<0.0001).

Conclusion

The outcomes of endovascular management of PCBS can be improved by taking embolization as a prior way of treatment, performing endovascular intervention in slight clinical severity and aggressive management of the post-procedural clinical disease.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as predictor of mortality and morbidity in cardiovascular surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an emerging biomarker of inflammation and predicts poorer outcome in cancer surgery. The prognostic value of NLR in cardiovascular surgery is unclear.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of in cardiovascular surgical patients were conducted to assess the role of perioperative NLR in predicting post-operative mortality and morbidity. Electronic searches were conducted on Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews for all prospective clinical studies reporting on NLR and post-operative morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular surgical patient population. Our primary end point was all-cause post-operative mortality and the secondary end point was post-operative morbidity. Mortality outcome from prospective studies were pooled for a meta-analysis using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Of the 999 citations identified, five studies with 3487 patients met the inclusion criteria. In a pooled analysis of three prospective studies of 3108 patients, a preoperative increase in NLR (>3.3 in cardiac surgery, >5 in vascular surgery) was associated with increased mortality at a mean follow-up of 34.8 months (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.46-2.36; P < 0.00001). Raised NLR value was also associated with increased cardiac mortality, amputation in vascular operations and raised risk of post-operative re-intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated NLR were associated with increased long-term mortality and morbidity after major cardiac and vascular surgery. NLR may guide perioperative management and risk-stratification of patients.

Impending Carotid Blowout Stabilization Using an LT-D Tube

Adequate stabilization of a patient presenting with a carotid blowout is one of the most challenging issues an on-call ENT surgeon can be confronted with. Reducing the bleeding and securing the airway are essential before more definitive management. We present the case of a 72-year-old patient with head and neck cancer who arrived at the emergency room with a carotid blowout and who was successfully stabilized using a King LT-D ventilation tube.