1
|
Baril DT. Early graft failure following lower extremity bypass. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2024; 10:101642. [PMID: 39525483 PMCID: PMC11546452 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Donald T. Baril
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peng Y, Rossi R, Falkenhain A, Bose S, Williams M, Wittgen C, Han D, Smeds MR. Factors Associated With Tobacco Cessation Advice Recall and Quit Rates in Vascular Surgery Patients. A Single Center Study. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2024; 58:714-722. [PMID: 38877384 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241259224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Smoking is an important modifiable risk factor in all vascular diseases and verbal advice from providers has been shown to increase rates of tobacco cessation. We sought to identify factors that will improve tobacco cessation and recall of receiving verbal cessation advice in vascular surgery patients at a single institution. METHODS The study is a retrospective cohort study. Patients seen in outpatient vascular surgery clinic who triggered a tobacco Best Practice Advisory (BPA) during their office visits over a 10-month period were contacted post-clinic and administered surveys detailing smoking status, cessation advice recall, and validated scales for nicotine dependence and willingness to quit smoking. This BPA is a "hard stop" that requires providers to document actions taken. Charts were reviewed for tobacco cessation documentation. Nine-digit zip-codes identified the area deprivation index, a measure of socioeconomic status. Univariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with cessation and advice recall. RESULTS One hundred out of 318 (31.4%) patients responded to the survey. Epic Slicer Dicer found 97 BPA responses. To dismiss the BPA, 89 providers (91.8%) selected "advised tobacco cessation" and "Unable to Advise" otherwise. Of the 318 patients, 115 (36.1%) had cessation intervention documented in their provider notes and 151 (47.5%) received written tobacco cessation advice. Of survey respondents, 70 recalled receiving verbal advice, 27 recalled receiving written advice, 28 reported receiving offers of medication/therapy for cessation. 55 patients reported having tobacco cessation plans, and among those 17 reported having quit tobacco. Recall of receiving written advice (P < .001) and recall of receiving medication/therapy (P = .008) were associated with recall of receiving verbal cessation advice. CONCLUSIONS Providing patients with tobacco cessation medication/therapy and written tobacco cessation education during office visits is associated with increased patients' recall of tobacco cessation advice. Vascular surgeons should continue to provide directed tobacco cessation advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanzun Peng
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ryan Rossi
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alec Falkenhain
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Saideep Bose
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, SSM Saint. Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael Williams
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, SSM Saint. Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Catherine Wittgen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, SSM Saint. Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - David Han
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, SSM Saint. Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew R Smeds
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, SSM Saint. Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gornik HL, Aronow HD, Goodney PP, Arya S, Brewster LP, Byrd L, Chandra V, Drachman DE, Eaves JM, Ehrman JK, Evans JN, Getchius TSD, Gutiérrez JA, Hawkins BM, Hess CN, Ho KJ, Jones WS, Kim ESH, Kinlay S, Kirksey L, Kohlman-Trigoboff D, Long CA, Pollak AW, Sabri SS, Sadwin LB, Secemsky EA, Serhal M, Shishehbor MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Wilkins LR. 2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:2497-2604. [PMID: 38743805 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
AIM The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate. STRUCTURE Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gornik HL, Aronow HD, Goodney PP, Arya S, Brewster LP, Byrd L, Chandra V, Drachman DE, Eaves JM, Ehrman JK, Evans JN, Getchius TSD, Gutiérrez JA, Hawkins BM, Hess CN, Ho KJ, Jones WS, Kim ESH, Kinlay S, Kirksey L, Kohlman-Trigoboff D, Long CA, Pollak AW, Sabri SS, Sadwin LB, Secemsky EA, Serhal M, Shishehbor MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Wilkins LR. 2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2024; 149:e1313-e1410. [PMID: 38743805 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
AIM The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate. STRUCTURE Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Moras E, Khan MI, Song DD, Syed M, Prabhakaran SY, Gandhi KD, Lavie CJ, Alam M, Sharma R, Krittanawong C. Pharmacotherapy and revascularization strategies of peripheral artery disease. Curr Probl Cardiol 2024; 49:102430. [PMID: 38309544 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
The global epidemiological transition of atherosclerotic vascular diseases is witnessing a rapid redistribution of its burden, shifting from high-income to low- and middle-income countries. With a wide clinical spectrum, spanning from intermittent claudication to more complex critical limb threatening ischemia, nonhealing ulcers, gangrene as well as acute limb ischemia, peripheral artery disease is often faced with the challenges of under-diagnosis and under-treatment despite its high prevalence. The management of peripheral arterial disease in patients with multiple comorbidities presents a formidable challenge and remains a pressing global health concern. In this review, we aim to provide an in-depth overview of the pathophysiology of peripheral artery disease and explore evidence-based management strategies encompassing pharmacological, lifestyle, interventional, and surgical approaches. By addressing these challenges, the review contributes to a better understanding of the evolving landscape of peripheral artery disease, offering insights into effective and holistic management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Errol Moras
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside- West, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, USA
| | - Mohammad Ishrak Khan
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside- West, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, USA
| | - David D Song
- Department of Medicine/Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and the Marie-Josée Henry R. Kravis Cardiovascular Health Center, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA
| | - Moinuddin Syed
- Department of Medicine/Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and the Marie-Josée Henry R. Kravis Cardiovascular Health Center, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kruti D Gandhi
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside- West, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, USA
| | - Carl J Lavie
- John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Mahboob Alam
- The Texas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Raman Sharma
- Department of Medicine/Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and the Marie-Josée Henry R. Kravis Cardiovascular Health Center, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patel RJ, Zarrintan S, Jagadeesh V, Vootukuru NR, Gaffey A, Malas MB. Long-term outcomes after lower extremity bypass in the actively smoking claudicant. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:1003-1011. [PMID: 37327952 PMCID: PMC10528269 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Smoking is known to increase complications, including poor wound healing, coagulation abnormalities, and cardiac and pulmonary ramifications. Across specialties, elective surgical procedures are commonly denied to active smokers. Given the base population of active smokers with vascular disease, smoking cessation is encouraged but is not required the way it is for elective general surgery procedures. We aim to study the outcomes of elective lower extremity bypass (LEB) in actively smoking claudicants. METHODS We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network LEB database from 2003 to 2019. In this database we found 609 (10.0%) never smokers (NS), 3388 (55.3%) former smokers (FS), and 2123 (34.7%) current smokers (CS) who underwent LEB for claudication. We performed two separate propensity score matches without replacement on 36 clinical variables (age, gender, race, ethnicity, obesity, insurance, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, previous coronary artery bypass graft, carotid endarterectomy, major amputation, inflow treatment, preoperative medications and treatment type), one of FS to NS and a second analysis of CS to FS. Primary outcomes included 5-year overall survival (OS), limb salvage (LS), freedom from reintervention (FR), and amputation-free survival (AFS). RESULTS Propensity score matches resulted in 497 well-matched pairs of NS and FS. In this analysis we found no difference in terms of OS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.70-1.24; P = .61), LS (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.63-1.82; P = .80), FR (HR, 0.9; 95% CI,0.71-1.21; P = .59), or AFS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI,0.71-1.22; P = .62). In the second analysis, we had 1451 well-matched pairs of CS and FS. There was no difference in LS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI,0.94-1.97; P = .11) or FR (HR, 1.02; 95% CI,0.88-1.19; P = .76). However, we did find a significant increase in OS (HR, 1.37; 95% CI,1.15-1.64, P <.001) and AFS (HR, 1.38; 95% CI,1.18-1.62; P < .001) in FS compared with CS. CONCLUSIONS Claudicants represent a unique nonemergent vascular patient population that may require LEB. Our study found that FS have better OS and AFS when compared with CS. Additionally, FS mimic nonsmokers at 5-year outcomes for OS, LS, FR, and AFS. Therefore, structured smoking cessation should be a more prominent part of vascular office visits before elective LEB procedures in claudicants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Vasan Jagadeesh
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Ann Gaffey
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kler A, Khambalia H, Pondor Z, Donne R, Giuffrida G, Augustine T, Campbell B, van Dellen D. Smoking is associated with a higher complication and failure rate in arteriovenous grafts for haemodialysis: A multi-centre experience. J Vasc Access 2023; 24:747-753. [PMID: 34727765 DOI: 10.1177/11297298211054634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Arteriovenous grafts (AVG) for haemodialysis (HD) access are recommended as a second line modality due to higher morbidity and mortality rates than arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). Smoking is already established as a risk factor in lower extremity bypass graft failure used for peripheral vascular disease, but its effect on AVGs remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the relationship of smoking on AVG outcomes. METHODS A 3 year (01/08/2015-01/08/2018) multi-centre retrospective study was carried out on patients receiving an AVG for HD. Data included patient demographics, medical history, operation, type of graft, postoperative course and primary and secondary patency rates. Statistical analyses performed were Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox's proportional hazard regression. RESULTS Fifty-five AVGs were performed (1052 AVF performed) in this period. The most common complication was thrombosis (38.9%). Primary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months were 55%, 45% and 44% respectively. Secondary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months were 63%, 56% and 54% respectively. Smoking was found to be a poor prognostic factor for primary (HR 3.734 (1.818-7.668 95% CI) p < 0.001) and secondary patency (HR 6.238 (2.729-14.257) p < 0.001). Smoking was also significantly associated with graft thrombosis (HR 5.741 (2.380-13.848 95% CI) p < 0.001). DISCUSSION Primary patency rates are lower than previous reports whilst secondary patency is equivalent. Smoking results in a greater risk of thrombosis and poorer primary and secondary patency. This is recognised in vascular surgical grafts, but has not been previously described in AVGs for HD access. Smoking is a modifiable risk factor and as AVGs are typically used for end-stage vascular access patients. Pre-operative strategies to promote smoking cessation, including patient education and prehabilitation should be employed to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Kler
- Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Hussein Khambalia
- Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Zulfikar Pondor
- Department of Nephrology, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rosie Donne
- Department of Nephrology, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Giuseppe Giuffrida
- Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Titus Augustine
- Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Babatunde Campbell
- Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - David van Dellen
- Manchester Centre for Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oleru OO, Shah NV, Zhou PL, Sedaghatpour D, Mistry JB, Wham BC, Kurtzman J, Mithani SK, Koehler SM. Recent Smoking History Is Not Associated with Adverse 30-Day Standardized Postoperative Outcomes following Microsurgical Reconstructive Procedures of the Upper Extremity. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2023; 31:61-69. [PMID: 36755815 PMCID: PMC9900040 DOI: 10.1177/22925503211024755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Upper extremity (UE) microsurgical reconstruction relies upon proper wound healing for optimal outcomes. Cigarette smoking is associated with wound healing complications, yet conclusions vary regarding impact on microsurgical outcomes (replantation, revascularization, and free tissue transfer). We investigated how smoking impacted 30-day standardized postoperative outcomes following UE microsurgical reconstruction. Methods: Utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, all patients who underwent (1) UE free flap transfer (n = 70) and (2) replantation/revascularization (n = 270) were identified. For each procedure, patients were stratified by recent smoking history (current smoker ≤1-year preoperatively). Baseline demographics and standardized 30-day complications, reoperations, and readmissions were compared between smokers and nonsmokers. Results: Replantation/revascularization patients had no differences in sex, race, or body mass index between smokers (n = 77) and nonsmokers. Smokers had a higher prevalence of congestive heart failure (5.2% vs 1.0%, P = .036) and nonsmokers were more often on hemodialysis (15.6% vs 10.4%, P = .030). Free flap transfer patients had no differences in age, sex, or race between smokers (n = 14) and nonsmokers. Smokers had a longer length of stay (6.6 vs 4.2 days, P = .001) and a greater prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD; 7.1% vs 0%, P = .044). Recent smoking was not associated with increased odds of any 30-day minor and major standardized surgical complications, readmissions, or reoperations following UE microsurgical reconstruction via free flap transfer or replantation/revascularization. Baseline diagnosis of COPD was also not a predictor of adverse 30-day outcomes following free flap transfer. Conclusion: Recent smoking history was not associated with any 30-day adverse outcomes following UE microsurgical reconstruction via replantation/revascularization or free flap transfer. In light of these findings, further investigation is warranted, with particular focus on adverse events specific to free flaps and replantation/revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olachi O. Oleru
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY)
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Neil V. Shah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY)
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Peter L. Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY)
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Dillon Sedaghatpour
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY)
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jaydev B. Mistry
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY)
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Bradley C. Wham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY)
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Joey Kurtzman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY)
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Suhail K. Mithani
- Department of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Reconstructive
Surgery, Duke University Medical
Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Steven M. Koehler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY)
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim Y, Thangappan K, DeCarlo CS, Jessula S, Majumdar M, Patel SS, Zacharias N, Mohapatra A, Dua A. Outcomes of Femoropopliteal Bypass for Lifestyle-Limiting Claudication in the Endovascular Era. J Surg Res 2022; 279:323-329. [PMID: 35809357 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outcomes after femoropopliteal bypass for intermittent claudication (IC) remain unclear in the endovascular era. METHODS A multi-institutional database was retrospectively queried for all femoropopliteal bypass procedures performed between 1995 and 2020. Demographics, operative details, and outcomes were documented. A statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards ratios (HR). RESULTS A total of 282 patients underwent femoropopliteal bypass surgery for IC. Median age was 68 y (interquartile range, 61-73 y). Bypass conduits included great saphenous vein (GSV) (48.2%), prosthetic grafts (48.9%), and non-GSV autogenous grafts (2.8%). Distal bypass target was above-knee in 62.1% and below-knee in 37.9% of patients. The most common postoperative complications were wound infections (14.2%) followed by unplanned 30-d hospital readmissions (12.4%). Mortality rates were low at 0.4% (30 d) and 3.2% (1 y). Five-year primary patency rates trended highest for claudicants undergoing above-knee bypass with GSV conduit (log-rank P = 0.065). Five-year amputation-free survival rates were highest using GSV conduit regardless of distal bypass target (log-rank P = 0.017). On a multivariable analysis, age (HR 1.02 [1.00-1.04], P = 0.023) and active smoking (HR 1.48 [1.06-2.06], P = 0.021) were identified as risk factors for diminished primary graft patency. Risk factors for amputation-free survival included age (HR 1.03 [1.01-1.05], P < 0.001) and GSV conduit type (HR 0.65 [0.46-0.90], P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Femoropopliteal bypass among claudicants is associated with high rates of wound infection and hospital readmission. Active smoking portends worse outcomes in this population. These data may inform clinical decision-making regarding surgical intervention for claudication in the endovascular era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Kim
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karthik Thangappan
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Charles S DeCarlo
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samuel Jessula
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Monica Majumdar
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shiv S Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nikolaos Zacharias
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abhisekh Mohapatra
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anahita Dua
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patra V, Mehra R, Dhillan R, Jha RK, Thupakula SR, Merkhed R. Vascular Graft Infections: a Decade’s Clinical Experience in Indian Population. Indian J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-021-02733-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
11
|
Reitz KM, Althouse AD, Meyer J, Arya S, Goodney PP, Shireman PK, Hall DE, Tzeng E. Association of Smoking With Postprocedural Complications Following Open and Endovascular Interventions for Intermittent Claudication. JAMA Cardiol 2021; 7:45-54. [PMID: 34613348 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Smoking is a key modifiable risk factor in the development and progression of peripheral artery disease, which often manifests as intermittent claudication (IC). Smoking cessation is a first-line therapy for IC, yet a minority of patients quit smoking prior to elective revascularization. Objective To assess if preprocedural smoking is associated with an increased risk of early postprocedural complications following elective open and endovascular revascularization. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used nearest-neighbor (1:1) propensity score matching of 2011 to 2019 data from the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including all cases with a primary diagnosis of IC and excluding emergent cases, primary procedures that were not lower extremity revascularization, and patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia within 30 days of the intervention. All data were abstracted June 18, 2020, and analyzed from July 26, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Exposures Preprocedural cigarette smoking. Main Outcomes and Measures Any and organ system-specific (ie, wound, respiratory, thrombosis, kidney, cardiac, sepsis, and neurological) 30-day complications and mortality, overall and in prespecified subgroups. Results Of 14 350 included cases of revascularization, 14 090 patients (98.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 65.7 (7.0) years. A total of 7820 patients (54.5%) were smoking within the preprocedural year. There were a total of 4417 endovascular revascularizations (30.8%), 4319 hybrid revascularizations (30.1%), and 5614 open revascularizations (39.1%). A total of 1594 patients (11.1%) had complications, and 57 (0.4%) died. Among 7710 propensity score-matched cases (including 3855 smokers and 3855 nonsmokers), 484 smokers (12.6%) and 34 nonsmokers (8.9%) experienced complications, an absolute risk difference (ARD) of 3.68% (95% CI, 2.31-5.06; P < .001). Compared with nonsmokers, any complication was higher for smokers following endovascular revascularization (26 [4.3%] vs 52 [2.1%]; ARD, 2.19%; 95% CI, 0.77-3.60; P = .003), hybrid revascularization (204 [17.3%] vs 163 [14.1%]; ARD, 3.18%; 95% CI, 0.23-6.13; P = .04), and open revascularization (228 [15.4%] vs 153 [10.3%]; ARD, 5.18%; 95% CI, 2.78-7.58; P < .001). Compared with nonsmokers, respiratory complications were higher for smokers following endovascular revascularization (20 [1.7%] vs 6 [0.5%]; ARD, 1.17%; 95% CI, 0.35-2.00; P = .009), hybrid revascularization (33 [2.8%] vs 10 [0.9%]; ARD, 1.93%; 95% CI, 0.85-3.02; P = .001), and open revascularization (32 [2.2%] vs 19 [1.3%]; ARD, 0.89%; 95% CI, 0-1.80; P = .06). Wound complications and graft failure were higher for smokers compared with nonsmokers following open interventions (wound complications: 146 [9.9%] vs 87 [5.8%]; ARD, 4.05%; 95% CI, 2.12-5.99; P < .001; graft failure: 33 [2.2%] vs 11 [0.7%]; ARD, 1.50%; 95% CI, 0.63-2.37; P = .001). In a sensitivity analysis, compared with active smokers (n = 5173; smoking within 2 weeks before the procedure), the risk of any complication was decreased by 65% for never smokers (n = 1197; adjusted odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.59) and 29% for former smokers (n = 4755; cessation more than 1 year before the procedure; adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; P = .001 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, more than half of patients with IC were smoking prior to elective revascularization, and complication risks were higher across all modalities of revascularization. These findings stress the importance of smoking cessation to optimize revascularization outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M Reitz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew D Althouse
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph Meyer
- Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shipra Arya
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Philip P Goodney
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Paula K Shireman
- Department of Surgery, UT Health San Antonio, University of Texas, San Antonio.,Department of Surgery, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio
| | - Daniel E Hall
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Wolff Center at UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Edith Tzeng
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fairgray TA, Najafzadeh Abriz A. A case of percutaneous endovascular thrombolysis of a prosthetic graft following occlusion. SONOGRAPHY 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/sono.12251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Afrooz Najafzadeh Abriz
- Medical Sonography School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences Central Queensland University Perth Western Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kokkinidis DG, Giannopoulos S, Haider M, Jordan T, Sarkar A, Singh GD, Secemsky EA, Giri J, Beckman JA, Armstrong EJ. Active smoking is associated with higher rates of incomplete wound healing after endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia. Vasc Med 2020; 25:427-435. [PMID: 32460647 DOI: 10.1177/1358863x20916526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The association between active smoking and wound healing in critical limb ischemia (CLI) is unknown. Our objective was to examine in a retrospective cohort study whether active smoking is associated with higher incomplete wound healing rates in patients with CLI undergoing endovascular interventions. Smoking status was assessed at the time of the intervention, comparing active to no active smoking, and also during follow-up visits at 6 and 9 months. Cox regression analysis was conducted to compare the incomplete wound healing rates of the two groups during follow-up. A total of 264 patients (active smokers: n = 41) were included. Active smoking was associated with higher rates of incomplete wound healing in the 6-month univariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio (HR) for incomplete wound healing: 4.54; 95% CI: 1.41-14.28; p = 0.012). The 6-month Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates for incomplete wound healing were 91.1% for the active smoking group versus 66% for the non-current smoking group. Active smoking was also associated with higher rates of incomplete wound healing in the 9-month univariable (HR for incomplete wound healing: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.11-4.76; p = 0.026) and multivariable analysis (HR for incomplete wound healing: 9.09; 95% CI: 1.06-100.0; p = 0.044). The 9-month KM estimates for incomplete wound healing were 75% in the active smoking group versus 54% in the non-active smoking group. In conclusion, active smoking status at the time of intervention in patients with CLI is associated with higher rates of incomplete wound healing during both 6- and 9-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damianos G Kokkinidis
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Stefanos Giannopoulos
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Moosa Haider
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Jordan
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Anita Sarkar
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Gagan D Singh
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Eric A Secemsky
- Department of Medicine, Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jay Giri
- Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research Center, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua A Beckman
- Department of Medicine-Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ehrin J Armstrong
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim TI, Zhang Y, Amin HP, Ochoa Chaar CI. Presentation and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in active smokers. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72:1720-1727.e1. [PMID: 32249043 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Smoking is a significant modifiable risk factor in the pathogenesis of carotid artery disease and has been shown to be a predictor of worse outcomes after vascular surgery. However, the effect of active smoking on outcomes of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy is unknown. This study analyzed the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy by smoking status in a large national database. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted carotid endarterectomy files (2011-2017) were reviewed. Patients were stratified according to smoking status, and outcomes were compared using propensity score matching (1:1) based on preoperative characteristics. RESULTS During the study period, 26,293 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy, with 19,282 (73.34%) nonsmokers and 7011 (26.66%) smokers. Smokers were more likely to be younger, to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, to have a symptomatic presentation, and to have higher anatomic risk (P < .05). Smokers were also more likely to have emergent surgery, to have general anesthesia, and to be reintubated (P < .05). After propensity matching, 5354 nonsmokers were matched with 5354 smokers who underwent carotid endarterectomy. Smokers were at significantly higher risk for death, with an odds ratio of 1.93 (confidence interval, 1.18-3.13). CONCLUSIONS Smokers are at increased risk for death after carotid endarterectomy compared with matched counterparts. Smoking should be considered an important risk factor for worse outcomes, and patients should be strongly counseled on the importance of smoking cessation before undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanner I Kim
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn
| | - Yawei Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Conn
| | - Hardik P Amin
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsay C, Luo J, Zhang Y, Attaran R, Dardik A, Ochoa Chaar CI. Perioperative Outcomes of Lower Extremity Revascularization for Rest Pain and Tissue Loss. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 66:493-501. [PMID: 31756416 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the clinical manifestation of severe peripheral artery disease presenting as rest pain (RP) and tissue loss (TL). Most studies compare CLI as a homogenous group with claudication with limited database studies specifically studying these differences. We hypothesize that CLI should be stratified into RP and TL because of significant differences in disease severity, comorbidities, and outcomes. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2016 was reviewed. All patients with a postoperative diagnosis of CLI undergoing femoral to popliteal bypass (FPB) with vein or graft were identified. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 or ICD-10 codes for RP or TL (gangrene or ulcer). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine 30-day mortality, morbidity, major amputation, and readmission adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and procedural details. RESULTS There were 5,304 patients. Compared to RP, patients with TL were older (P < 0.0001) and more likely to be dependent (P < 0.0001). TL patients were also more likely to have diabetes (P < 0.0001), congestive heart failure (P < 0.0001), renal failure (P = 0.004), dialysis (P < 0.0001), history of wound infection (P < 0.0001), and sepsis (P < 0.0001). TL patients had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P < 0.0001), were less likely to be transferred from home (P < 0.0001), and more likely to receive an FPB with vein (P = 0.03). Patients with TL had worse perioperative outcomes compared with RP in terms of pneumonia (P = 0.004), unplanned intubation (P = 0.009), cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P = 0.003), bleeding requiring transfusions (P < 0.0001), sepsis (P < 0.0001), septic shock (P = 0.02), and reoperation (P < 0.0001). TL was associated with significantly higher 30-day morbidity (P < 0.0001), 30-day mortality (P < 0.0001), major amputation (P = 0.0004), and readmission rates (P = 0.005). Patients with TL compared with those with RP also had longer hospital stays (P < 0.0001) and days between operation to discharge (P < 0.0001). TL was independently associated with increased 30-day morbidity (OR: 1.16 [1.00-1.35]) and major amputation (OR: 2.48 [1.29-4.76]) compared with RP. CONCLUSIONS Patients with RP and TL have drastic differences that impact perioperative mortality and readmissions. TL is an independent predictor of 30-day morbidity and major amputation. The stratification of CLI into RP and TL can provide insight into variations in outcomes and provide a means to quantify the risks associated with the 2 manifestations of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Tsay
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Jiajun Luo
- Department of Statistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Yawei Zhang
- Department of Statistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Robert Attaran
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Alan Dardik
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baumgartner I, Norgren L, Fowkes FGR, Mulder H, Patel MR, Berger JS, Jones WS, Rockhold FW, Katona BG, Mahaffey K, Hiatt WR. Cardiovascular Outcomes After Lower Extremity Endovascular or Surgical Revascularization: The EUCLID Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 72:1563-1572. [PMID: 30261955 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower extremity revascularization (LER) is a common treatment in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), but long-term outcomes are poorly defined. OBJECTIVES The aim was to analyze LER in the EUCLID (Examining Use of tiCagreLor In paD) trial to determine predictors and cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS Patients were grouped according to whether they received a post-randomization LER (n = 1,738) or not (n = 12,147). All variables were assessed for significance in univariable and parsimonious multivariable models. The primary endpoint was myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death; major adverse limb events (MALE) included acute limb ischemia or major amputation. RESULTS A post-randomization LER occurred in 12.5% of patients and was an endovascular LER in 74.7%. Endovascular LERs were performed more often in North America, whereas surgical procedures occurred more frequently in Europe. Independent factors predicting LER were prior and type of prior LER, geographic region, limb symptoms, diabetes, and smoking. A post-randomization LER was associated with an increased risk for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 1.60; 95% confidence interval: 1.35 to 1.90; p < 0.0001) and MALE (hazard ratio: 12.0; 95% confidence interval: 9.47 to 15.30; p < 0.0001). Event rates for the primary endpoint after LER were numerically higher in the surgical subgroup, but MALE were similar between surgical and endovascular LER. CONCLUSIONS In the EUCLID trial, LER was most often endovascular. Following LER, there was an increased hazard for the primary endpoint (with higher event rates in the surgical group) and a markedly increased risk for MALE events (with similar event rates between surgical and endovascular LER procedures). (A Study Comparing Cardiovascular Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease [EUCLID]; NCT01732822).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Baumgartner
- Swiss Cardiovascular Centre, Inselspital, Division of Angiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lars Norgren
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - F Gerry R Fowkes
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Hillary Mulder
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Manesh R Patel
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey S Berger
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - W Schuyler Jones
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Frank W Rockhold
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Kenneth Mahaffey
- Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - William R Hiatt
- Division of Cardiology and CPC Clinical Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arinze N, Farber A, Levin SR, Cheng TW, Jones DW, Siracuse CG, Patel VI, Rybin D, Doros G, Siracuse JJ. The effect of the duration of preoperative smoking cessation timing on outcomes after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and lower extremity bypass. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70:1851-1861. [PMID: 31147124 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Smoking has been associated with poor postoperative outcomes across various surgical procedures. However, the effect of quitting smoking preoperatively for elective operations is unclear. Our goal was to assess the temporal effect of smoking cessation before elective lower extremity bypass (LEB) and open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair on perioperative outcomes. METHODS The Vascular Quality Initiative was reviewed for all patients with a documented smoking history and who underwent an elective LEB or open AAA repair from 2010 to 2017. Patients were then categorized into three groups: long-term smoking cessation (LTSC; defined as quitting smoking ≥8 weeks before surgery), short-term smoking cessation (STSC; defined as quitting smoking < 8 weeks before surgery), and current smokers (CS). Patient and procedure details were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis for crude and propensity-matched data were used to compare outcomes among groups. RESULTS We identified 15,950 patients with a documented smoking history who underwent an elective LEB (43.3% LTSC, 2.2% STSC, 54.5% CS) and 5215 patients who underwent an elective open AAA repair (42.9% LTSC, 2.4% STSC, 54.7% CS). LTSC patients compared with STSC and CS, respectively, were more often obese, diabetic, on aspirin, on a statin, had coronary artery disease, and had congestive heart failure, but were less likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (all P < .05). Perioperative outcomes demonstrated significant differences comparing LTSC with STSC and CS for myocardial infarction (3.4% vs 1.4% vs 1.4%), dysrhythmia (4.2% vs 2.5% vs 2.7%), 30-day mortality (1.6% vs .3% vs .9%), in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 0% vs 0.5%; all P < .001) and congestive heart failure (1.8% vs .8% vs 1.5%; P = .003). There was no difference in outcomes after analysis of propensity-matched data for LTSC or STSC on any postoperative outcomes for LEB. For open AAA repair, LTSC compared with CS patients, respectively, were older, more often male, obese, on a statin, diabetic, and less frequently had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .05 for all). Perioperative outcomes demonstrated differences in pulmonary complications when comparing LTSC with STSC and CS (9.5% vs 8.0% vs 12.5%; P = .002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LTSC patients compared with CS were less likely to experience pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.79; P < .001). Propensity-matched multivariate analysis confirmed that LTSC remained significantly less likely to encounter pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.74; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS In our propensity-matched, risk-adjusted cohort, LTSC and STSC were not associated with perioperative outcomes after elective LEB. LTSC was associated with a significantly decreased odds of pulmonary complications after elective open AAA repair. STSC was not associated with perioperative outcomes after elective open AAA repair. If time permits, a longer period of smoking cessation should be attempted before elective open AAA repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nkiruka Arinze
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Alik Farber
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Scott R Levin
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Thomas W Cheng
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Douglas W Jones
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Carrie G Siracuse
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Steward Healthcare, Norwood Hospital, Norwood, Mass
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Denis Rybin
- Department of Statistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass
| | - Gheorghe Doros
- Department of Statistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, Fleisher LA, Fowkes FGR, Hamburg NM, Kinlay S, Lookstein R, Misra S, Mureebe L, Olin JW, Patel RAG, Regensteiner JG, Schanzer A, Shishehbor MH, Stewart KJ, Treat-Jacobson D, Walsh ME. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 69:e71-e126. [PMID: 27851992 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 456] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
19
|
Schlieder I, Richard M, Nacar A, Rieger R, Bethge A, Vijayakumar S, Dietzek AM. Active Tobacco Use in Patients with Claudication Does Not Affect Outcomes after Endovascular Interventions. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 60:279-285. [PMID: 31103674 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the advent of endovascular procedures, the indications for intervention in claudicants have become less strict. Many interventionalists, however, will not intervene in patients with lifestyle-limiting claudication unless they have discontinued tobacco use. Many patients are unable to comply with this goal, and there is little published evidence to suggest that continued tobacco use results in poorer outcomes. We sought to determine if it is justified to deny this group of patients endovascular, potentially lifestyle-improving, procedures based on their outcomes. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed between 2007 and 2011 at a midsize community teaching hospital. Patients included had documented lifestyle-limiting claudication, underwent endovascular therapy, and had no previous vascular intervention. Patients were divided into 2 groups: active smokers (AS) and nonsmokers (NS) including former and never smokers. The primary outcome was the need for reintervention and the secondary outcomes were the need for surgical revascularization, limb loss, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death. RESULTS One hundred thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria with 89 being male (64.5%). Forty-seven (34%) were active smokers versus 91 (66%) who were nonsmokers. Mean age at initial intervention for all 138 subjects was 66.34 years (standard deviation 10.7) and was not statistically different between the AS and NS groups. Mean follow-up was 3.6 years and was not significantly different between the two groups. Between the two groups (AS vs NS), there was no statistically significant difference between the rate of reintervention, surgical bypass, and limb loss. We also did not observe any significant difference in the rate of MI, stroke, or death during our follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Although tobacco use has been shown to negatively impact bypass patency, our data show that it does not appear to increase the need for reintervention, conversion to open surgical revascularization, limb loss, or other morbidities in patients undergoing endovascular interventions for claudication. We continue to strongly recommend all our patients who smoke to discontinue tobacco use. Our results, however, do not support the notion that those patients who are unable to quit should be denied the potential benefit of an endovascular intervention. The most important limitation of our study is the small numbers of patients available for review. Larger studies will be necessary to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Schlieder
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT
| | - Michele Richard
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT
| | - Alpen Nacar
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT
| | - Rebecca Rieger
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT
| | - Amy Bethge
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT
| | | | - Alan M Dietzek
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Parvar SL, Fitridge R, Dawson J, Nicholls SJ. Medical and lifestyle management of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 2019; 68:1595-1606. [PMID: 30360849 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a global health issue associated with impaired functional capacity and elevated risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). With changing risk factor profiles and an aging population, the burden of disease is expected to increase. This review considers evidence for the noninvasive management of PAD and makes clinical recommendations accordingly. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed to examine the evidence for smoking cessation, exercise therapy, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, antihypertensive therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, and glycemic control in diabetes for patients with PAD. RESULTS Nicotine replacement, bupropion, and varenicline are safe and more effective than placebo in achieving smoking abstinence. Wherever it is practical and available, supervised exercise therapy is ideal treatment for intermittent claudication. Alternatively, step-monitored exercise can increase walking performance and the participant's compliance with less staff supervision. Clopidogrel is preferable to aspirin alone for all patients. However, small studies support the use of dual antiplatelet therapy after revascularization to improve limb outcomes. More recently, the addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin alone was proven to be more effective in reducing MACEs without a significant increase in major bleeding. However, the exact role of direct oral anticoagulant therapy in the management of PAD is still being understood. Evidence is emerging for more intensive blood pressure and lipid-lowering therapy than traditional targets. Whereas research in PAD is limited, there is clinical scope for an individualized approach to these risk factors. The management of diabetes remains challenging as glycemic control has not been demonstrated to improve macrovascular outcomes. Any potential impact of glycemic control on microvascular disease needs to be weighed against the risks of hypoglycemia. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors appear to reduce MACEs, although caution is advised, given the increased incidence of lower limb amputation in clinical trials of canagliflozin. CONCLUSIONS Medical and lifestyle management of PAD should aim to improve functional outcomes and to reduce MACEs. Smoking cessation counseling or pharmacotherapy is recommended, although new strategies are needed. Whereas supervised exercise therapy is ideal, there can be barriers to clinical implementation. Other initiatives are being used as an alternative to walking-based supervised exercise therapy. More studies are required to investigate the role of intensive glycemic, blood pressure, and dyslipidemia control in patients with PAD. Overall, a multifactorial approach is recommended to alter the natural history of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saman L Parvar
- Vascular Research Centre, Heart Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Robert Fitridge
- Vascular Research Centre, Heart Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Joseph Dawson
- Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stephen J Nicholls
- Vascular Research Centre, Heart Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Butt T, Lilja E, Örneholm H, Apelqvist J, Gottsäter A, Eneroth M, Acosta S. Amputation-Free Survival in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Arterial Disease With Heel Ulcer: Open Versus Endovascular Surgery. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2019; 53:118-125. [DOI: 10.1177/1538574418813746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Background: Heel ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are hard to heal. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the difference in amputation-free survival (AFS) between open and endovascular revascularization in patients with DM, PAD, and heel ulcers. Methods: Retrospective comparative study of results of open versus endovascular surgery in patients with DM, PAD, and heel ulcer presented at the multidisciplinary diabetes foot clinic between 1983 and 2013. Results: Patients with heel ulcers were treated with endovascular intervention (n = 97) and open vascular surgery (n = 30). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the AFS was higher in patients undergoing open vascular surgery compared to the endovascular group ( P = .009). Multivariate analysis showed that open vascular surgery versus endovascular therapy (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.9; P = .025) was an independent factor associated with higher AFS. The proportion of patients undergoing endovascular therapy in the former (1983-2000) time period was 47% compared to 89% in the latter (2001-2013) time period ( P < .001). Conclusion: The AFS was higher after open than endovascular surgery among patients with DM and PAD with heel ulcer. These results suggest that open vascular surgery should be offered more often as opposed to current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talha Butt
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Vascular Center, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Erika Lilja
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Vascular Center, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Hedvig Örneholm
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Vascular Center, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Jan Apelqvist
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Anders Gottsäter
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Vascular Center, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Magnus Eneroth
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Stefan Acosta
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Vascular Center, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jones DW, Goodney PP, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Schermerhorn ML, Siracuse JJ, Kang J, Columbo JA, Suckow BD, Stone DH. Active smoking in claudicants undergoing lower extremity bypass predicts decreased graft patency and worse overall survival. J Vasc Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
23
|
Kalbaugh CA, Gonzalez NJ, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Brothers TE, Farber MA, Beck AW, Hallett JW, Marston WA, Vallabhaneni R. The impact of current smoking on outcomes after infrainguinal bypass for claudication. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68:495-502.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
24
|
Wise ES, Wergin JE, Mace EH, Kallos JA, Muhlestein WE, Shelburne NJ, Hocking KM, Brophy CM, Guzman RJ. Upper Extremity Pulse Pressure Predicts Amputation-Free Survival after Lower Extremity Bypass. Am Surg 2017. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481708300742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Increased pulse pressure reflects pathologic arterial stiffening and predicts cardiovascular events and mortality. The effect of pulse pressure on outcomes in lower extremity bypass patients remains unknown. We thus investigated whether preoperative pulse pressure could predict amputation-free survival in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for atherosclerotic occlusive disease. An institutional database identified 240 included patients undergoing lower extremity bypass from 2005 to 2014. Preoperative demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, operative factors, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were recorded, and compared between patients with pulse pressures above and below 80 mm Hg. Factors were analyzed in bi- and multivariable models to assess independent predictors of amputation-free survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the temporal effect of pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg on amputation-free survival. Patients with a pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg were older, male, and had higher systolic and lower diastolic pressures. Patients with pulse pressure <80 mm Hg demonstrated a survival advantage on Kaplan-Meier analysis at six months (log-rank P = 0.003) and one year (P = 0.005) postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for decreased amputation-free survival at six months included nonwhite race, tissue loss, infrapopliteal target, and preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg (hazard ratio 2.60; P = 0.02), while only tissue loss and pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg (hazard ratio 2.30, P = 0.02) remained predictive at one year. Increased pulse pressure is independently associated with decreased amputation-free survival in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass. Further efforts to understand the relationship between increased arterial stiffness and poor outcomes in these patients are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S. Wise
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Eric H. Mace
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | - Kyle M. Hocking
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Colleen M. Brophy
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Raul J. Guzman
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking rates have declined; however, it remains the primary modifiable risk factor for vascular disease. While vascular surgeons often advise patients to quit, few provide assistance. We sought to understand patients' interest in quitting and determine factors that influence this willingness to quit. METHODS Anonymous surveys were given to vascular surgery clinic patients in a single institution over a 5-month period. Demographic information, smoking status, cessation attempts, and barriers to quitting were obtained. Nicotine dependence was determined using the Fagerstrom Test, and willingness to quit was assessed using a contemplation ladder. Patient's willingness to quit was evaluated in relation to symptomatic status, previous/planned operation, and nicotine dependence levels. RESULTS A total of 490 patients (92%) completed the survey with 109 (22%) current smokers, 195 (40%) former smokers, and 186 (38%) never smokers. Never smokers were more likely to be female and employed while smokers were more likely to be disabled. Although 51% of smokers displayed moderate/high nicotine dependence, 54% demonstrated willingness to consider quitting within 6 months. The primary barrier to cessation identified was previous failed attempt(s) to quit in 44%. Most (90%) had previously attempted quitting, 63% attempted 3 or more times, and the most common technique used was "quitting cold turkey". Fifty-nine percent of patients reported physicians' had offered assistance in cessation, but only 2% had been in a cessation program. There was no correlation between willingness to consider quitting and symptomatic status, previous/planned operation, or nicotine dependence. Smokers of less than 10 cigarettes/day had a lower nicotine dependence level (P = 0.0001) and higher willingness to consider quitting (P = 0.0015), as did those who had fewer failed prior attempts to quit and who did not believe it was too late to quit. CONCLUSIONS Most of our vascular patients self-report as nonsmokers. Over half of those who smoke demonstrate willingness to consider quitting within 6 months, which is not dependent on nicotine dependence, previous/planned operation, or symptomatic status. Those who smoke less than 10 cigarettes per day, have fewer past failed attempts to quit, and believe that it is not too late to quit are more likely to consider quitting. Vascular surgeons should be more aware of previous quit attempts and patterns of smoking and be proactive in assisting patients in cessation attempts.
Collapse
|
26
|
Outcomes of open and endovascular lower extremity revascularization in active smokers with advanced peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65:1680-1689. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
27
|
|
28
|
The effect of body mass index on major outcomes after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65:1193-1207. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
29
|
Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, Fleisher LA, Fowkes FGR, Hamburg NM, Kinlay S, Lookstein R, Misra S, Mureebe L, Olin JW, Patel RAG, Regensteiner JG, Schanzer A, Shishehbor MH, Stewart KJ, Treat-Jacobson D, Walsh ME. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2017; 135:e726-e779. [PMID: 27840333 PMCID: PMC5477786 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 411] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines with recommendations to improve cardiovascular health. These guidelines, based on systematic methods to evaluate and classify evidence, provide a cornerstone of quality cardiovascular care. In response to reports from the Institute of Medicine1 ,2 and a mandate to evaluate new knowledge and maintain relevance at the point of care, the ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines (Task Force) modified its methodology.3 –5 The relationships among guidelines, data standards, appropriate use criteria, and performance measures are addressed elsewhere.5
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather L Gornik
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Coletta Barrett
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Neal R Barshes
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Matthew A Corriere
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Douglas E Drachman
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Lee A Fleisher
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Francis Gerry R Fowkes
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Naomi M Hamburg
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Scott Kinlay
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Robert Lookstein
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Sanjay Misra
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Leila Mureebe
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Jeffrey W Olin
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Rajan A G Patel
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Judith G Regensteiner
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Mehdi H Shishehbor
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Kerry J Stewart
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - Diane Treat-Jacobson
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| | - M Eileen Walsh
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. Functioning as the lay volunteer/patient representative. ACC/AHA Representative. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Representative. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease Representative. Society for Vascular Medicine Representative. Society of Interventional Radiology Representative. Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Representative. Society for Vascular Surgery Representative. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Representative. Society for Vascular Nursing Representative
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dalal PK, Prasad A. Contemporary Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention for Critical Limb Ischemia. Interv Cardiol Clin 2017; 6:251-259. [PMID: 28257772 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2016.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Optimal treatment strategies for CLI remain controversial. The only randomized trial comparing surgical with endovascular revascularization suggests no significant difference in limb salvage between open surgical bypass and angioplasty. Although novel endovascular strategies are now available, their efficacies remain largely untested in a randomized fashion. This review provides an overview of the data surrounding contemporary outcomes of endovascular therapy with an emphasis on current knowledge gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik K Dalal
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7872, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Anand Prasad
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7872, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mixson JD, Brothers TE. Revascularization of smokers with claudication is not predicted to limit quality of life despite a higher risk of late failure. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65:128-135.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
32
|
Hicks CW, Najafian A, Farber A, Menard MT, Malas MB, Black JH, Abularrage CJ. Below-knee endovascular interventions have better outcomes compared to open bypass for patients with critical limb ischemia. Vasc Med 2016; 22:28-34. [PMID: 27928034 DOI: 10.1177/1358863x16676901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Both open surgery and endovascular peripheral interventions have been shown to effectively improve outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease, but minimal data exist comparing outcomes performed at and below the knee. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes following infrageniculate lower extremity open bypass (LEB) versus peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with critical limb ischemia. Using data from the 2008-2014 Vascular Quality Initiative, 1-year primary patency, major amputation, and mortality were compared among all patients undergoing LEB versus PVI at or below the knee for rest pain or tissue loss. Overall, 2566 patients were included (LEB=500, PVI=2066). One-year primary patency was significantly worse following LEB (73% vs 81%; p<0.001). One-year major amputation (14% vs 12%; p=0.18) and mortality (4% vs 6%; p=0.15) were similar regardless of revascularization approach. Multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline differences between groups confirmed inferior primary patency following LEB versus PVI (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90; p=0.004), but no significant differences in 1-year major amputation (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.80-1.40; p=0.67) or mortality (HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.44-1.14; p=0.16). Based on these data, we conclude that endovascular revascularization is a viable treatment approach for critical limb ischemia resulting from infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin W Hicks
- 1 Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alireza Najafian
- 2 Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alik Farber
- 3 Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew T Menard
- 4 Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- 1 Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James H Black
- 1 Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher J Abularrage
- 1 Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hicks CW, Najafian A, Farber A, Menard MT, Malas MB, Black JH, Abularrage CJ. Diabetes does not worsen outcomes following infrageniculate bypass or endovascular intervention for patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64:1667-1674.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
34
|
Impact and Duration of Brief Surgeon-Delivered Smoking Cessation Advice on Attitudes Regarding Nicotine Dependence and Tobacco Harms for Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 38:113-121. [PMID: 27521828 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2016] [Revised: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the recognized benefits of smoking cessation, many clinicians question if a brief smoking cessation intervention can help dedicated smokers with peripheral arterial disease understand nicotine dependence and harms related to smoking. We investigated the impact and durability of a multimodal smoking cessation intervention on patient attitudes regarding nicotine dependence and the health effects of smoking. METHODS We conducted a pilot cluster-randomized trial of a brief smoking cessation intervention at 8 vascular surgery practices between September 1, 2014 and August 31, 2015. Compared with control sites, patients at intervention sites received protocolized brief cessation counseling, medications, and referrals to a quitline. After their clinic visit and again at 3 months, participants completed a brief survey about patient attitudes regarding nicotine dependence and the health effects of smoking. Responses to questions were analyzed using chi-squared test and Student's t-test. RESULTS All trial participants (n = 156) complete the initial survey, and 75 (45%) participants completed the follow-up survey. Intervention and control patients both reported a greater than 30-pack-year history (80% vs. 90%, P = 0.07) and previous failed quit attempts (77% vs. 78%, P = 0.8). Compared with usual care, patients in the intervention group were more likely to describe hearing advice to quit from their surgeon (98% vs. 77%, P < 0.001), and expressed "a lot" or "some" interest in quitting (95.4% vs. 85.7%, P = 0.05). Patients in the intervention group were also more likely to acknowledge their addictive behaviors, consistently scoring higher on question bank items regarding nicotine addiction (52.9 vs. 48.0, P = 0.006) and the negative health effects of smoking (scaled score 56.6 vs. 50.6, P = 0.001). When resurveyed 3 months after intervention, patients in the intervention group had larger declines in nicotine dependence and health effect domains, suggesting durable impact of the intervention on patient attitudes regarding nicotine addiction and smoking harms. CONCLUSIONS Brief smoking cessation counseling by a vascular surgeon increases patient interest in smoking cessation and awareness of smoking harms, and this effect was durable 3 months after intervention. This evidence suggests that even brief counseling within a surgical clinic has the potential to impact patient desire to quit.
Collapse
|
35
|
Marqués de Marino P, Cernuda Artero I, Martínez López I, Revuelta Suero S, Hernández Mateo M, Serrano Hernando F. Resultados del bypass infrainguinal protésico en isquemia crítica: factores asociados a permeabilidad y salvamento de la extremidad. ANGIOLOGIA 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.angio.2014.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
36
|
Abstract
Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at heightened risk of both systemic cardiovascular adverse events, as well as limb-related morbidity. The optimal management of patients with PAD requires a comprehensive treatment strategy incorporating both lifestyle changes, including smoking cessation and exercise, as well as optimal medical therapy. Pharmacological therapies for patients with PAD are targeted both at modifying broad risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events, as well as reducing limb-related morbidity. Observational data suggest that indicated pharmacological treatments are greatly underutilized in PAD, underscoring the need for improvements in patient identification and care delivery. Ongoing trials of novel therapies in patients with PAD will further inform pharmacological strategies to reduce both systemic cardiovascular risk and limb-related morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc P. Bonaca
- From the Vascular Medicine Section, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A. Creager
- From the Vascular Medicine Section, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Armstrong EJ, Wu J, Singh GD, Dawson DL, Pevec WC, Amsterdam EA, Laird JR. Smoking cessation is associated with decreased mortality and improved amputation-free survival among patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60:1565-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 08/08/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
38
|
Abstract
Patients presenting for lower extremity revascularization often have multiple systemic comorbidities, making them high-risk surgical candidates. Neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia are equivocal in their effect on perioperative cardiac morbidity and improved graft patency. Postoperative epidural analgesia may improve perioperative cardiac morbidity. Systemic antithrombotic and anticoagulation therapy is common among this patient population and may affect anesthetic techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Anton
- St. Luke's Medical Group, CHI St. Luke's Health, 6720 Bertner Avenue, Room 0520, MC 1-226, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology, Texas Heart Institute, Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, 6720 Bertner Avenue, Room 0520, MC 1-226, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Marie LaPenta McHenry
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Selvarajah S, Ahmed AA, Schneider EB, Canner JK, Pawlik TM, Abularrage CJ, Hui X, Schwartz DA, Hisam B, Haider AH. Cholecystectomy and wound complications: smoking worsens risk. J Surg Res 2014; 192:41-9. [PMID: 25015752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2014] [Revised: 05/23/2014] [Accepted: 06/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, approximately 800,000 cholecystectomies are performed annually. We sought to determine the influence of preoperative smoking on postcholecystectomy wound complication rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2011), patients aged ≥18 y who underwent elective open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for benign gallbladder disease were identified using current procedural terminology codes. Multivariate regression was performed to determine the association between smoking status and wound complications, by surgical approach. RESULTS Of 143,753 identified patients, 128,692 (89.5%) underwent LC, 27,788 (19.3%) were active smokers, and 100,710 (70.2%) were females. Active smokers were younger than nonsmokers (mean + standard deviation age: 44.2 (14.9) versus 51.6 (17.9) years); P < 0.001) and had fewer comorbidities. Within 30-d postcholecystectomy, wound complications were reported in 2011 (1.4%) patients. Compared with nonsmokers, active smokers demonstrated increased odds of wound complications after both open cholecystectomy (odds ratio 1.28; P = 0.010) and LC (odds ratio 1.20; P = 0.020) after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics. Having wound complications increased the average postoperative length of stay by 2-4 d (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Active smokers are more likely to develop wound complications after cholecystectomy, regardless of surgical approach. Occurrence of wound complications consequently increases postoperative length of stay. Smoking abstinence before cholecystectomy may reduce the burden associated with wound complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalini Selvarajah
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Ammar A Ahmed
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Eric B Schneider
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph K Canner
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher J Abularrage
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Xuan Hui
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Diane A Schwartz
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Butool Hisam
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Adil H Haider
- Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|