In-hospital outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia and end-stage renal disease after revascularization

Mid-Term Results of Popliteal-Pedal Inframalleolar Vein Bypasses in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients After Previous Failed Tibial Endovascular Recanalization

BACKGROUND

Inframalleolar bypass still preserves its role in the modern endovascular era. Aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of "short" inframalleolar vein bypasses in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) after the previously failed tibial endovascular recanalization.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2021,107 CLTI patients in 3 Italian Departments of Vascular Surgery underwent "short" inframalleolar vein bypass after failed tibial endovascular recanalization. Early (30-day) and 3-year outcomes were evaluated in terms of survival, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and amputation-free survival. Univariate analysis of the perioperative factors affecting outcomes were performed by the means of log-rank test. The associations of procedure variables were sought based on a multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Distal anastomosis (inframalleolar) was mostly performed on dorsal pedis (64, 59.8%). At 30 days, bypass occlusion was recorded in 5 cases (4.6%). The mean follow-up period was 20.5 ± 17.9 months. The estimated 3-year overall survival was 66.7%. Three-year estimates of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and amputation-free survival were 68.5%, 70.1%, 70.2%, and 76.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a negative association of insulin treatment with primary patency (HR 4.3, P = 0.04), primary assisted patency (HR 5.1, P = 0.02), and secondary patency (HR 5.1, P = 0.02). The negative association of long-term corticosteroid use was also found with primary patency (HR 7.8, P = 0.005), primary assisted patency (HR 8.7, P = 0.003), secondary patency (HR 8.7, P = 0.003), and amputation-free survival (HR 3.9, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Short" vein bypasses to the foot arteries in CLTI patients yielded good mid-term overall patency and limb salvage rates after a failed tibial endovascular recanalization. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and long-term corticosteroid use seemed to affect the outcomes.

The Double Burden: Deciphering Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) poses significant challenges in clinical management due to its unique pathology and poor treatment outcomes. This review calls for a tailored classification and risk assessment for these patients to guide better revascularization choices with early minor amputation as a first-line strategy in advanced stages.

METHODS

This review consolidates key findings from recent literature on CLTI in ESRD, focusing on disease mechanisms, treatment options, and patient outcomes. It evaluates the literature to clarify the decision-making process for managing CLTI in ESRD.

RESULTS

CLTI in ESRD patients often results in worse clinical outcomes, such as nonhealing wounds, increased limb loss, and higher mortality rates. While the literature reveals ongoing debates regarding the optimal revascularization method, recent retrospective studies and meta-analyses suggest potential benefits of endovascular treatment (EVT) over open bypass surgery (OB) in reducing mortality and wound complications, with comparable amputation-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The selection of revascularization methods in ESRD patients with CLTI is complex, necessitating individualized strategies. The importance of early detection and timely intervention is critical to decelerate disease progression and improve revascularization outcomes. There is a shift in these treatment strategies toward less invasive endovascular procedures, acknowledging the limitations these patients face with open revascularization surgeries. Considering early minor amputations after revascularization could prevent worse consequences, reflecting a shift in the approach to managing CLTI in ESRD patients.

Comparison of mortality and amputation after lower extremity bypass versus peripheral vascular intervention in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and comorbid chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

Comorbid chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse outcomes for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, comparative effectiveness data are limited for lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with CLTI and CKD. We aimed to evaluate (1) 30-day all-cause mortality and amputation and (2) 5-year all-cause mortality and amputation for LEB vs PVI in patients with comorbid CKD.

METHODS

Individuals who underwent LEB and PVI were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative with Medicare claims-linked outcomes data. Propensity scores were calculated using 13 variables, and a 1:1 matching method was used. The mortality risk at 30 days and 5 years in LEB vs PVI by CKD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, with interaction terms added for CKD. For amputation, cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray models were used to account for the competing risk of death, with interaction terms for CKD added.

RESULTS

Of 4084 patients (2042 per group), the mean age was 71.0 ± 10.8 years, and 69.0% were male. Irrespective of CKD status, 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.42, P = .78) was similar for LEB vs PVI, but LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation (sub-HR [sHR]: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.97, P = .04). CKD status, however, did not modify these results. Similarly, LEB vs PVI was associated with a lower risk of 5-year mortality (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, P < .001) but no difference in 5-year amputation (sHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89-1.20, P = .67). CKD status did not modify these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of CKD status, patients had a lower risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day amputation with LEB vs PVI. Results may help inform preference-sensitive treatment decisions on LEB vs PVI for patients with CLTI and CKD, who may commonly be deemed too high risk for surgery.

Outcomes of peripheral artery disease and polyvascular disease in patients with end-stage kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and end-stage kidney disease are a high-risk population, and concomitant atherosclerosis in coronary arteries (CAD) or cerebral arteries (CVD) is common. The aim of the study was to assess long-term outcomes of PAD and the impact of coexistent CAD and CVD on outcomes.

METHODS

The United States Renal Data System was used to identify patients with PAD within 6 months of incident dialysis. Four groups were formed: PAD alone, PAD with CAD, PAD with CVD, and PAD with CAD and CVD. PAD-specific outcomes (chronic limb-threatening ischemia, major amputation, percutaneous/surgical revascularization, and their composite, defined as major adverse limb events [MALE]) as well as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were studied.

RESULTS

The study included 106,567 patients (mean age, 71.2 years; 40.8% female) with a median follow-up of 546 days (interquartile range, 214-1096 days). Most patients had PAD and CAD (49.8%), 25.8% had PAD alone, and 19.2% had all three territories involved. MALE rate in patients with PAD was 22.3% and 35.0% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. In comparison to PAD alone, the coexistence of both CAD and CVD (ie, polyvascular disease) was associated with a higher adjusted rates of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.31), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.69-1.88), stroke (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.52,1.80), and MALE (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with end-stage kidney disease have a high burden of PAD with poor long-term outcomes, which worsen, in an incremental fashion, with the involvement of each additional diseased arterial bed.

Outcomes of lower extremity peripheral arterial interventions in patients with and without chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a progressive vascular condition characterized by the narrowing or blockage of arteries, primarily attributed to atherosclerosis. PAD's prevalence in the general population is estimated at approximately 5.9%. Notably however, among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), PAD's prevalence is substantially higher, ranging from 17% to 48%. This review paper emphasizes the pervasiveness of PAD and its intricate relationship with CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It demonstrates the importance of early detection, proactive screening, and understanding the formidable challenges associated with treating heavily calcified lesions.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Comprehensive literature searches encompassed the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, in order to identify studies involving lower extremity peripheral arterial interventions in patients both with and without CKD or ESRD. The search spanned the timeframe from January 2001 to July 2023. The search strategy included vocabulary terms concerning peripheral artery disease, lower extremities, revascularization, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Initial searches were used to identify articles based on title. Exclusion criteria was then applied, and any redundant articles were removed. The articles abstracts were then reviewed, and relevant articles were selected. Once selected the articles were thoroughly reviewed including the references to find other relevant articles that were missed during the initial search process. In total 28 articles were selected and included for review of clinical data in regard to PAD outcomes in patients with advanced kidney disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight the need for personalized approaches in diagnosing and treating PAD in CKD and ESRD patients. Interdisciplinary collaboration, such as those between nephrologists, vascular surgeons, and interventional radiologists, is vital to optimize outcomes. Further research should focus on innovative, tailored interventions to enhance limb preservation, reduce mortality, prolong patency, and cut healthcare costs.

Contemporary outcomes of initial treatment strategy of endovascular intervention or bypass in patients with critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

The optimal management for revascularization after critical limb ischemia (CLI) is controversial due to limited studies comparing long-term results of endovascular and open techniques. This study compares long-term outcomes after initial management of CLI via lower extremity bypass (LEB) and percutaneous vascular intervention (PVI).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigates outcomes of patients who underwent endovascular or open surgical management for CLI at a single institution from 2013-2018. All patients with diagnosis of CLI were included and separated based on initial therapy of PVI or LEB. Demographic, procedural, and follow-up data were assessed. Primary endpoints included major adverse limb events (MALE), specifically the need for major amputation and reintervention. Secondary endpoints included mortality at 30 days and one year. A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazard regression model was used to assess the relationship between Surgery group and time to MALE/death while controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS

This study identified 338 patients with an initial diagnosis of CLI who underwent either LEB (n = 108, 32%) or PVI (n = 230, 68%). The average age was 71.4, 54.4% were male, 30% were African American, 53.6% were diabetic, and 93.2% had hypertension. Patients who underwent LEB were more predominantly smokers (p = .003) and less predominantly on dialysis at time of surgery (p = .01). Re-intervention rates in the bypass group (11%) were not significantly different than the PVI group (9%; p = .95). In the bypass group, 20 (19%) patients had a major amputation with a median time of 189.5 days compared to 23 (10%) patients at a median time of 113 days in the PVI group; however, this difference was not significant (p = .16). There was no significant difference in 1-year mortality between the LEB (2%) and PVI group (4%; p = .2). The cumulative incidence of MALE/death at 30 days was 4.0% in the bypass group and 3.7% in the PVI group (p = .2). Incidences of MALE/death were 21.1% and 48.5% in the bypass group and 19.7 and 45.9% in the PVI group at one and 2 years, respectively. Intervention type was not found to be significantly associated with MALE/death after controlling for possible confounders (HR = 0.82, p = .43).

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial management of CLI, there is no significant difference in long-term outcomes in terms of major amputation, need for reintervention, limb-salvage, and 1-year mortality.

Differences in major limb outcomes by indication for lower extremity endovascular revascularization in patients receiving hemodialysis

The incidence of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) in patient receiving hemodialysis is remarkably higher than the general population. The treatment strategy and prognosis for LEAD patients differs depending on whether a patient has intermittent claudication (IC) or critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, the distinction between the prognosis in HD-dependent patients with IC and CLTI has not been fully elucidated. This study is to determine whether indication of PAD has a distinct impact on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and limb events in patients receiving hemodialysis. The current study included 2321 prospectively enrolled patients from the Tokyo taMA peripheral vascular intervention research ComraDE registry (UMIN-CTR no. UMIN000015100) between September 2014 and December 2016. Out of the enrolled patients, 1644 were not receiving hemodialysis (non-HD patients) and 603 were receiving hemodialysis (HD patients). A composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke events defined as MACCE; while limb events were defined as a composite of unscheduled major amputation, unscheduled major lower limb surgery, acute limb ischemia, unscheduled endovascular treatment, and target lesion revascularization. Propensity score matching was applied among the non-HD and HD patients, in whole group, IC subgroup, and CLTI subgroup. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for the analysis of outcomes for the whole group, IC subgroup, and the CLTI subgroup. CLTI accounted for 75.5% of the HD patients, whereas IC was 63.4% in the non-HD patients. The HD patients exhibited more frequent below-the-knee lesions than those in the non-HD patients in both IC (p = 0.01) and CLTI (p < 0.001) subgroups. Overall, HD patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of MACCE at 24 months. This trend was similar for limb events in whole group and CLTI subgroup. In contrast, no significant differences in outcomes for limb events were found in IC subgroup. Although, prognosis after EVT in HD patients were significantly worse than non-HD patients, comparable outcome with non-HD patients was observed in the patients treated for IC. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR No. UMIN000015100).

Association of depression and anxiety disorders with outcomes after revascularization in chronic limb-threatening ischemia hospitalizations nationwide

OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the end stage of peripheral artery disease, often present with comorbid depression and anxiety disorders. The prevalence of these comorbidities in the inpatient context over time, and their association with outcomes after revascularization and resource usage is unknown.

METHODS

Using the 2011 to 2017 National Inpatient Sample, two cohorts were created-CLTI hospitalizations with endovascular revascularization and CLTI hospitalizations with surgical revascularization. Within each cohort, the annual prevalence of depression and anxiety disorder diagnoses was determined, and temporal trends were evaluated using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Hierarchical multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine the association of depression and anxiety disorder diagnoses with inpatient major amputation, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost, adjusting for illness severity, comorbidities, and potential bias in the documentation of depression and anxiety disorder diagnoses stratified by patient sociodemographic data.

RESULTS

Across the study period were a total of 245,507 CLTI-related hospitalizations with endovascular revascularization and 138,922 with surgical revascularization. Hospitalizations with a depression or anxiety disorder diagnosis increased from 10.8% in 2011 to 15.3% in 2017 in the endovascular revascularization cohort and from 11.7% in 2011 to 14.4% in 2017 in the surgical revascularization cohort (P_trend < .001). In the endovascular revascularization cohort, depression was associated with higher odds of major amputation (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.30). In addition, depression (9 vs 8 days [P < .001]; $105,754 vs $102,481 [P = .018]) and anxiety disorder (9 vs 8 days [P < .001]; $109,496 vs $102,324 [P < .001]) diagnoses were associated with a longer median LOS and higher median costs. In the surgical revascularization cohort, depression was associated with a higher odds of major amputation (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.58) and a longer LOS (median, 9 vs 9 days; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Depression and anxiety disorder diagnoses have become increasingly prevalent among CLTI hospitalizations including revascularizations. When present, these psychiatric comorbidities are associated with an increased risk of amputation and greater resource usage.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for TASC II D Femoropopliteal Lesions with Critical Limb Ischaemia: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the mid-term results of endovascular therapy (EVT) for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society (TASC) II D femoropopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI).

METHODS

Fifty-seven limbs of 54 patients with CLI due to TASC II D femoropopliteal lesions who underwent EVT at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University were retrospectively analysed in single-centre, observational study. The patient characteristics, endovascular procedural details, freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR), patency rates, ulcer healing rate, and limb salvage rate were accessed.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 68.2 ± 8.2 years. All patients were treated by EVT. The final technical success rate was 98.2% (56/57). There were 23 cases of pain at rest, 18 cases of ulcer, and 15 cases of gangrene. The median length of the treated segment was 286 ± 42 mm (56/56) and the mean number of stents placed per patient was 2.0 ± 0.8 (49/56). The postoperative ankle-brachial index (ABI) was significantly higher than that of the preoperative ABI (P < 0.05). The perioperative complication rate was 10.7% (6/56). The re-stenosis or occlusion rate was 44.6% (25/56). The estimated rates of freedom from TLR at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 86.8%, 67.0%, and 62.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that predictors of freedom from TLR were the number of runoff vessels, length of the lesion, and complexity of the lesion, while predictors for re-stenosis or occlusion were the length and the complexity of the lesion. The ulcer healing rate was 93.8%. The limb salvage rates were 76.4%, 74.4%, and 70.9% at 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The mid-term outcomes of EVT for TASC II D femoropopliteal lesions in patients with CLI indicated that this treatment approach is safe and effective, and is clinically applicable.

The Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Mid-Term Outcomes after Revascularisation of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to determine the relationship between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and major 12-month outcomes for patients with in-hospital treatment for symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD).

METHODS

An analysis of the prospective longitudinal multicentric cohort study with 12-month follow-up was conducted including patients who underwent endovascular or open surgery for symptomatic PAOD at 35 German vascular centres (initial study protocol: NCT03098290). Severity of CKD was grouped into four stages combining information about the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and dialysis dependency. Outcomes included overall mortality as well as the two composite endpoints of amputation or death, and of major cardiovascular events (MACE). 12-month incidences and adjusted hazard ratios were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier function and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 4354 patients (32% female, 69 years mean age, 68% intermittent claudication, 69% percutaneous endovascular revascularisation) were included and followed for 244 days in median. Thereof, 22% had any CKD and 5% had end stage kidney disease (ESKD) at baseline. The 12-month overall mortality rate was 3.6% (95% CI 2.3-4.9) with 96 events in the entire cohort: 147 were amputated or died (5.3%, 95% CI 5.2-5.3), and 277 had a MACE (9.5%, 95% CI 9.4-9.5). When compared with patients without kidney disease, ESKD was significantly associated with overall mortality (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.5), amputation or death (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.4-4.1), and MACE (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3-3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study on mid-term outcomes after invasive revascularisation for symptomatic PAOD, one out of five patients suffered from any CKD while those few with ESKD had twice the odds of death, of amputation or death, and of major adverse cardiovascular events after twelve months. These results emphasise that concomitant CKD and its impact on outcomes should be considered by severity while mild and moderate grades should not lead to ineffectual treatment strategies.

The Impact of Clinical Follow-Up After Revascularization on the Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for optimal follow-up for patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization (LER) for peripheral arterial disease recommend multiple visits with imaging during the first year followed by yearly monitoring thereafter. Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients are at a greater risk for mortality and limb amputation than claudicants and thus necessitate closer monitoring. The goal of this article is to study the effects of compliance with follow-up after revascularization for patients with CLTI on major amputation rates and mortality.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective chart review of consecutive patients undergoing LER for CLTI was performed. Patients were stratified based on compliance with follow-up to compliant or noncompliant cohorts. Patient characteristics, reinterventions, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were 356 patients undergoing LER and 61% (N = 218) were compliant. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. Noncompliant patients were more likely to undergo endovascular interventions compared to compliant patients (92.8% vs. 79.4%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in perioperative outcomes between the 2 groups with overall 30-day mortality of 0.6%. After mean follow-up of 2.7 years, compliant patients had greater ipsilateral reintervention rates (49.1% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.005) and overall reintervention rates (61% vs. 44.2%, P = 0.002) compared to noncompliant patients. There was no significant difference in mortality or ipsilateral major amputations between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were compliant with follow-up after LER for CLTI underwent more reinterventions with no difference in mortality or major limb amputation. Further research regarding the threshold for reintervention and the optimal schedule for follow-up in patients with CLTI is needed.

Bypass surgery versus endovascular intervention for lower extremity revascularization in patients with chronic renal disease or end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular revascularization (ER) and open revascularization (OR) are recognized treatment modalities for peripheral artery disease, but whether one technique provides better outcomes than the other is unclear, especially in patients with chronic or end-stage renal disease.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search on the PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar databases. We considered randomized-controlled trials, and retrospective record-based and prospective studies for inclusion. All included studies compared patient outcomes between the two management modalities and reported adjusted effect sizes.

RESULTS

We found the risks of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.92) and 30-day mortality (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.49-0.80) during the post-operative period to be significantly lower in patients undergoing ER than in those undergoing OR. The pooled odds of amputation within 30 days of the post-operative period suggested a significantly higher risk of amputation in patients undergoing ER (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.32-1.73) than in the others. Compared to patients undergoing OR, those undergoing ER had higher odds of being discharged to home (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.58-3.36), lower odds of wound complications within 24 months of the post-operative period (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.15-0.79), and a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD - 5.9; 95% CI - 10.8 to - 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

For elderly patients with ESRD and chronic limb ischemia, ER may be the best choice due to its lower risk of mortality, lower odds of wound complications, reduced length of hospital stay, and reduced risk of re-intervention requirement when compared to OR. However, OR should be considered as an option when limb salvage is preferred.

End-stage renal disease patients undergoing angioplasty and bypass for critical limb ischemia have worse outcomes compared to non-ESRD patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality following lower extremity amputation for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Angioplasty and bypass are used in ESRD patients with CLI; however, the treatment of choice remains controversial. We compared the long-term outcomes in patients with CLI undergoing angioplasty or bypass to evaluate the differences between patients with ESRD and those without ESRD.

METHODS

Established databases were searched for observational studies comparing outcomes following bypass or angioplasty for CLI in patients with ESRD to those in non-ESRD patients. End points included survival, limb salvage, amputation-free survival (AFS), and primary and secondary patency at 1-year post-procedure. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effect model.

RESULTS

We included 20 studies with a total of 24,851 patients. ESRD patients compared to non-ESRD patients with CLI had significantly lower survival post-angioplasty (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72, p < .001) and post-bypass (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.45, p < .001). ESRD patients had lower rates of limb salvage post-bypass (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.53, p < .001) and post-angioplasty (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.70, p < .001). AFS was significantly lower in ESRD patients compared to non-ESRD patients following angioplasty (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.71, p < .001) and bypass (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16-0.47, p < .001) despite no significant differences in primary patency. ESRD patients had overall worse secondary patency post-angioplasty and/or bypass (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.94, p = .03) compared to non-ESRD patients. A meta-analysis of four studies directly comparing survival in ESRD patients with CLI based on whether they underwent angioplasty or bypass showed no difference (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.64-1.35, p = .69).

CONCLUSION

ESRD patients have worse survival, limb salvage, and AFS outcomes following angioplasty and bypass for CLI compared to non-ESRD patients. Large randomized controlled trials comparing these two modalities of treatment in this patient population are needed for further clarity.

Pedal Acceleration Time (PAT): A Novel Predictor of Limb Salvage

BACKGROUND

In the setting of Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD), pedal arch interrogation by ultrasound has not been well described. Patients with noncompressible vessels and/or open wounds of the foot may preclude the use of ankle-brachial indices, toe pressure measurements, or TcPO2, respectively. We propose that pedal artery interrogations with Pedal Acceleration Time (PAT) can be a predictor for limb salvage in patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively kept database was performed from 2018 to 2019. Patients with pending amputation due to severe infection (WIFI infection class 2 and 3) were excluded from the study. We identified 73 limbs with CLTI that fit the inclusion criteria. Data included WIFI classification, age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, PAT, ABI, and TBI when reliable, were collected. PAT measurements were categorized into 4 classifications; 1 (40-120 msec), 2 (121-180 msec), 3 (181-224 msec), and 4 (Greater than 225 msec). Statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-three limbs with CLTI were included in our study. All patients underwent arterial revascularization with either percutaneous technique or arterial bypass. Limb salvage was achieved in 59 (81%) of the 73 limbs. All 59 limbs had a 2-classification improvement in their PAT following interventions. A total of 14 (19%) limbs without improvement in their PAT underwent above ankle level amputations. An improvement in PAT classes to class 1 or 2 is associated with limb salvage.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with noncompressible ankle pressures or nonobtainable toe pressures poses a challenge in the complete assessment of WIFI classification. Our group has shown that PAT can be used in the scoring system for severity of ischemia in conjunction with current WIFI classification. Our data suggests that limb salvage correlates with post procedure PAT in category 1 and 2. Therefore we propose that PAT be added as part of the WIFI classification.

A prognostic risk score for major amputation in dialysis patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia after endovascular revascularization

BACKGROUND

Almost 38% of all patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) have peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs that can lead to chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of several factors to conduct a stratification of the amputation risk in CKD patients with CLTI receiving endovascular revascularization.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, single-center study of patients treated from 2010 to 2016. The primary endpoint was the major amputation. The study included adult CKD dialysis patients affected by CLTI (rest pain and/or trophic lesions) with indication to endovascular revascularization and excluded for open repair.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were considered (58 men [70.7%], 24 women [29.3%] mean age 70.4±15.0 years). The number of major amputations was 28 (34.1%). The arterial lesion severity (TASC II-classification) and the trophic lesions extension (WIfI classification) were significantly associated with major amputation (OR and 95%CI, 1.20 [1.07-1.34], P=0.001; 2.65 [1.49-4.72], P=0.001; respectively). Based on the above-mentioned characteristics, a prognostic score was proposed to predict the major amputation risk. A score ≥23 was associated with a 67.6% probability of amputation in the following 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The CLTI revascularization is associated with poor outcomes in CKD patients. The present clinical score provided a pragmatic tool to calculate the major amputation risk. An elevated score could facilitate the decision-making process in order to perform an endovascular treatment vs. conservative approach.

Outcomes of Lower Extremity Endovascular Revascularization: Potential Predictors and Prevention Strategies

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a manifestation of atherosclerosis, which may affect arteries of the lower extremities. The most dangerous PAD complication is chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Without revascularization, CLTI often causes limb loss. However, neither open surgical revascularization nor endovascular treatment (EVT) ensure long-term success and freedom from restenosis and revascularization failure. In recent years, EVT has gained growing acceptance among all vascular specialties, becoming the primary approach of revascularization in patients with CLTI. In clinical practice, different clinical outcomes after EVT in patients with similar comorbidities undergoing the same procedure (in terms of revascularization technique and localization of the disease) cause unsolved issues that need to be addressed. Nowadays, risk management of revascularization failure is one of the major challenges in the vascular field. The aim of this literature review is to identify potential predictors for lower extremity endovascular revascularization outcomes and possible prevention strategies.

Early outcomes of patients with chronic kidney disease after revascularization for critical limb ischemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report early outcomes of patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) after revascularization for critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

Perioperative data of patients from the CRITISCH (critical limb ischemia) Registry, who also had NDD-CKD (stages 3 and 4), were compared to their counterparts with normal renal function (NRF) or mild renal insufficiency (stages 1 and 2). Patient characteristics and type of first-line treatment were assessed. Amputation-free survival was the primary composite endpoint. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) and hemodynamic failure of revascularization. Multivariable logistic regression determined risk factors for the endpoints.

RESULTS

424 patients with NDD-CKD were identified. Endovascular revascularization (ER) was performed in 251 patients (59.2%). Eighty-six patients (20.3%) underwent bypass surgery (BS) and 29 patients (6.8%) femoral artery patchplasty (FAP). Conservative treatment (CT) was offered to 46 patients (10.9%); 12 patients (2.8%) underwent primary major amputation (PMA). Logistic regression analysis showed an increased early risk for amputation/death (OR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.09-3.40), death (OR=5.53, 95% CI: 1.92-15.90) and hemodynamic failure of the revascularization (OR=1.80, 95% CI: 1.19-2.72) compared to patients with NRF. Patients with NDD-CKD also seem to carry a higher risk for MACCE (OR=1.82, 95% CI: 0.99-3.36). NDD-CKD was not a risk factor for limb loss alone (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.49-2.22).

CONCLUSIONS

NDD-CKD was an independent risk factor for early postoperative mortality, morbidity and reduced patency, but not for limb loss. Robust follow-up is necessary to monitor for such events, as well as to prevent readmission.

Interplay of Diabetes Mellitus and End-Stage Renal Disease in Open Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) confers a significant survival disadvantage and is associated with a high major amputation rate. Moreover, diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent risk factor for developing CLTI. However, the interplay between end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and DM on outcomes after peripheral revascularization for CLTI is not well established. Our goal was to assess the effect of DM on outcomes after an infrainguinal bypass for CLTI in patients with ESRD.

METHODS

Using the Vascular Quality Initiative dataset from January 2003 to March 2020, records for all primary infrainguinal bypasses for CLTI in patients with ESRD were included for analysis. One-year and perioperative outcomes of all-cause mortality, reintervention, amputation-free survival (AFS), and major adverse limb event (MALE) were compared for patients with DM versus those without DM.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1,058 patients (66% male) with ESRD, 726 (69%) patients had DM, and 332 patients did not have DM. The DM group was younger (median age, 65 years vs. 68 years; P = 0.002), with higher proportions of obesity (body-mass index>30 kg/m2; 34% vs. 19%; P < 0.001) and current smokers (26% vs. 19%; P = 0.013). The DM group presented more frequently with tissue loss (76% vs. 66%; P < 0.001). A distal bypass anastomosis to tibial vessels was more frequently performed in the DM group compared to the non-DM group (57% vs. 45%; P < 0.001). DM was independently associated with higher perioperative MALE (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.68; P = 0.013), without increased risks of loss of primary patency and composite outcomes of amputation or death. On the mean follow-up of 11.4 ± 5.5 months, DM patients had a significantly higher rate of one-year MALEs (43% vs. 32%; P = 0.001). However, the one-year primary patency and AFS did not differ significantly. After adjusting for confounders, the risk-adjusted hazards for MALE (HR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.68; P = 0.013) were significantly increased in patients with DM. However, DM was not associated with increased risk of AFS (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91-1.47; P = 0.238), or loss of primary patency (HR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.79-1.37; P = 0.767).

CONCLUSIONS

DM and ESRD each independently predict early and late major adverse limb events after an infrainguinal bypass in patients presenting with CLTI. However, in the presence of ESRD, DM may increase perioperative adverse events but does not influence primary patency and AFS at one year. The risk profile associated with ESRD appears to supersede that of DM, with no additive effect.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of lower extremity peripheral arterial interventions in patients with and without chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease

OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greater risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Although individual studies have documented an association between CKD and/or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing PAD interventions in an era of technological advances in peripheral revascularization, the magnitude of the effect size is unknown. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of PAD interventions for patients with CKD/ESRD with those patients with normal renal function, stratified by intervention type (endovascular vs surgical), reflecting contemporary practice.

METHODS

Five databases were analyzed from January 2000 to June 2019 for studies that had compared the outcomes of lower extremity PAD interventions for patients with CKD/ESRD vs normal renal function. We included both endovascular and open interventions, with an indication of either claudication or critical limb ischemia. We analyzed the pooled odds ratios (ORs) across studies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random effects model. Funnel plot and exclusion sensitivity analyses were used for bias assessment.

RESULTS

Seventeen observational studies with 13,140 patients were included. All included studies, except for two, had accounted for unmeasured confounding using either multivariable regression analysis or case-control matching. The maximum follow-up period was 114 months (range, 0.5-114 months). The incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was greater in those with CKD/ESRD than in those with normal renal function (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.25-2.27; P = .001). The incidence of major amputations (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.37-2.83; P < .001) and long-term mortality (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.45-3.58; P < .001) was greater in those with CKD/ESRD. The greater TLR rates with CKD/ESRD vs normal renal function were only seen with endovascular interventions, with no differences for surgical interventions. The differences in rates of major amputations and long-term mortality between the CKD/ESRD and normal renal function groups were statistically significant, regardless of the intervention type.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CKD/ESRD who have undergone lower extremity PAD interventions had worse outcomes than those of patients with normal renal function. When stratifying our results by intervention (endovascular vs open surgery), greater rates of TLR for CKD/ESRD were only seen with endovascular and not with open surgical approaches. Major amputations and all-cause mortality were greater in the CKD/ESRD group, irrespective of the indication. Evidence-based strategies to manage this at-risk population who require PAD interventions are essential.

Impact of Kidney Disease on Peripheral Arterial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on outcomes of patients undergoing peripheral arterial disease (PAD) interventions who have comorbid CKD/ESRD versus those who do not have such comorbid condition. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze outcomes in this patient population.

METHODS

Five databases were searched for studies comparing outcomes of lower extremity PAD interventions for claudication and critical limb ischemia (CLI) in patients with CKD/ESRD versus non-CKD/non-ESRD from January 2000 to June 2019.

RESULTS

Our study included 16 observational studies with 44,138 patients. Mean follow-up was 48.9 ± 27.4 months. Major amputation was higher with CKD/ESRD compared with non-CKD/non-ESRD (odds ratio [OR 1.97] [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-2.80], p = 0.001). Higher major amputations with CKD/ESRD versus non-CKD/non-ESRD were only observed when indication for procedure was CLI (OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.53-3.36], p < 0.0001) but were similar for claudication (OR 1.15 [95% CI 0.53-2.49], p = 0.72). The risk of early mortality was high with CKD/ESRD patients undergoing PAD interventions compared with non-CKD/non-ESRD (OR 2.55 [95% CI 1.65-3.96], p < 0.0001), which when stratified based on indication, remained higher with CLI (OR 3.14 [95% CI 1.80-5.48], p < 0.0001) but was similar with claudication (OR 1.83 [95% CI 0.90-3.72], p = 0.1). Funnel plot of included studies showed moderate bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing lower extremity PAD interventions for CLI who also have comorbid CKD/ESRD have an increased risk of experiencing major amputations and early mortality. Randomized trials to understand outcomes of PAD interventions in this at-risk population are essential.

Implications of Renal Disease in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Arterial Interventions

Since the first peripheral endovascular intervention (PVI) in 1964, the procedure's technical aspects and indications have advanced significantly. Today, endovascular procedures span the spectrum of presentations from acute limb ischemia to critical limb ischemia and symptomatic limiting claudication. Goals of PVI remain restoring limb perfusion, minimizing rates of amputation and mortality, and sparing the need for the high-risk bypass surgery. Unfortunately, there are no large randomized controlled trials that address the optimal approach to peripheral arterial disease revascularization in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

Influence of end-stage renal disease on long-term survival after major amputation

Background: To analyze long-term outcomes and possible influencing factors in patients with endstage renal disease (ESRD) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) after major amputation compared to patients with normal renal function and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Patients and methods: Abstraction of single-center medical records of patients undergoing above knee (AKA) and below knee (BKA) amputation over a 10 years period (n = 436; 2009-2018). Excluded were amputations due to trauma or tumor. Patients were subdivided according to renal function in three categories: ESRD patients (n = 98), non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD, n = 98) and normal renal function (NF, n = 240). Predefined endpoints were survival and postoperative complications. Cox-regression models were built to analyze independent risk factors for outcome parameters. Results: In total, 298 AKA, 133 BKA and 5 knee joint exarticulations were performed. ESRD patients showed inferior in-hospital results as to death (ESRD 36.7 % vs. CKD 19.4 % and NF 20.0 %, P = .002). Similarly, long-term survival rates (6 months: ESRD 55.0 % vs. CKD 69.4 %, NF 67.9 % 1 year: ESRD 48.6 %, CKD 60.2 %, NF 60.8 % 5 years: ESRD 9.9 %, CKD 31.8 %, NF 37.1 %, P < .001) were significantly decreased for ESRD patients. Median postoperative survival was 10 months in ERSD, and 22 months in CKD and NF, respectively. Analysis of postoperative surgical complications revealed no differences between groups (ESRD 19.4 %, CKD 17.3 %, NF 17.0 %; P = 0.433). Cox regression analysis indicated that dialysis (HR 1.63; 95 % CI 1.22-2.16; P = .001), hypertension (HR 1.59; 95 % CI 0.99-2.54) and smoking (HR 1.22; 95 % CI 1.03-1.44; P = .022) was associated with increased risk of death during follow-up. Conclusions: Mortality after limb amputation in ERSD patients remains high. Survival of ERSD patients is lower in relation to chronic kidney disease and patients with normal renal function. Due to poor in hospital outcomes and absent long-term survival, benefit of primary amputation in ERSD seems scarce.

In-hospital outcome of peripheral vascular intervention in dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) outcome remains incompletely elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the outcome of PVI in dialysis patients with those with normal kidney function.

METHODS

Using weighted data from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2002 and 2014, we identified all peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients aged ≥18 years that underwent PVI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine in-hospital outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1,186,192 patients who underwent PVI, 1,066,830 had normal kidney function (89.9%) and 119,362 had ESRD requiring dialysis (10.1%). Critical limb ischemia was more prevalent in dialysis patients (63.2 vs. 34.0%, p < .001). Compared with normal kidney function group, ESRD requiring dialysis was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (1.5 vs. 4.2%, adjusted OR: 2.13 [95% CI: 2.04-2.23]) and longer length of hospital stay (median 3 days, Interquartile range [IQR] (0-6) vs. 7 days, IQR (4-18); p < .001). Dialysis patients had higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; 14.3 vs. 9.8%, p < .001) and net adverse cardiovascular events (composite of MACE, major bleeding, or vascular complications; 40.8 vs. 29.1%, p < .001). ESRD patients less frequently underwent open bypass (5.6 vs. 8.5%, p < .001) and more frequently had major amputation (10.3 vs. 3.0%, p < .001) compared with normal kidney function group.

CONCLUSION

PAD patients on dialysis who underwent PVI have higher rates of mortality and adverse outcomes as compared to those with normal kidney function.

Alprostadil treatment of critical limb ischemia in hemodialysis patients : A retrospective single-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia are common in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis treatment and are associated with a high rate of amputation and mortality. The effect of treatment with prostanoids in this specific group of patients is unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center analysis of hemodialysis patients with critical limb ischemia was performed who were treated with the prostanoid analogue alprostadil as an infusion during hemodialysis in the period from 2000 to 2013. The primary study outcome was a combined end-point including amputation and death 1 year after start of alprostadil. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe amputation-free survival and overall survival. A multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was calculated for the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients (60 males, 69.7%) were studied. The median alprostadil treatment period was 1.8 months. The 1‑year amputation-free survival was 41%. In 36% of patients an amputation was necessary and 35% died. Despite alprostadil treatment, 36% of the study patients additionally underwent an endovascular procedure and 16% had bypass surgery. Men had a significantly higher amputation rate (45%) than women (15%) (P = 0.009). Male sex and dialysis vintage were significantly associated with an increased risk for primary outcome CONCLUSIONS: Despite treatment with alprostadil the mortality, amputation rate and the need for revascularization procedures in hemodialysis patients with critical limb ischemia remained high. The outcome, however, was comparable with that of other treatment, such as endovascular procedures and bypass surgery. The effect of any current treatment strategy on amputation rate or mortality in that patient group remains uncertain.

Objective Performance Goals for Surgical Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Based on prospective vein bypass trials for lower leg ischemia, objective performance goals (OPG) were established by the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and are used as a benchmark tool for open and endovascular treatments. This study aims to analyze OPG of all patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) treated by open revascularization techniques at a tertiary care facility in routine practice.

METHODS

From January 2005 to March 2013, 315 patients (mean age 72 years) with CLI were retrospectively included in this study. Inclusion criteria were patients with Fontaine stage III and IV, realized revascularization with open surgical procedures (bypass grafting or endarterectomy), or hybrid method (open + endovascular). Exclusion criteria were primary major amputations, patients with revascularization treatments of the index leg within the last 3 months, and missing aftercare. Primary end point was "amputation-free survival" (AFS), and secondary end point was "freedom from major adverse limb event + perioperative death (30 days)" (MALE + POD) according to the SVS. The technical end point was primary patency. Mean follow-up was 34 months. The following variables were studied: clinical stage (Fontaine), previous interventions, bypass material used, and site of the distal anastomosis. The statistical evaluation and preparation was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. A P value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients (31%) fulfilling the adjusted SVS OPG criteria showed significantly better results for AFS, MALE + POD, and primary patency (P = 0.013, P = 0.015, P = 0.002, respectively). Regarding the AFS (1 year: 74%), multivariate analysis displayed significant worse results for patients with end-stage renal disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-4.60, P < 0.001) and Fontaine stage IV (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.11-2.57, P = 0.015). Regarding MALE + POD (1 year: 64%), male patients (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.90, P = 0.011) showed a significantly better outcome and patients without previous interventions of the index leg (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.09-2.09, P = 0.013) showed a significantly worse outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we were able to show that it is possible to reach the efficacy of OPGs set by SVS in a surgically treated all-comers cohort of CLI patients. Nevertheless, patients who did not fulfill the SVS OPG criteria showed significantly worse results for AFS and MALE + POD.

Open Versus Endovascular Revascularization of Below-Knee Arteries in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia

Background:

Evaluation of below-the-knee open revascularization (OR) versus endovascular revascularization (EVT) in patients with end-stage renal disease and critical limb ischemia (CLI) was performed.

Patients and Methods:

Seventy-seven dialysis patients with CLI and infrapopliteal involvement from 2007 to 2017 were included. Thirty-five patients received OR and 42 patients were treated with EVT. Survival, amputation-free survival (AFS) and wound-healing were evaluated. Furthermore, both groups were analyzed for differences as to anatomic (lesion length, runoff, pedal arch classification) and clinical (VSG risk score, WIfI score) characteristics.

Results:

Amputation-free survival (1-year AFS: OR 54.5% vs 47.6% in EVT, 2-year AFS OR 38.3% vs 23.9% EVT, P = .201) did not significantly differ between OR and EVT nor did the wound healing rate (29% OR vs 31% EVT, P = .532). Overall survival was noticeably poor (1-year survival: 66.7% in OR and 49% in EVT, 2-year survival OR 47.4% vs EVT 27.7%; P = .088); evaluation of peripheral runoff (Rutherford score 6.9 OR vs 7.1 EVT, P = .499) and pedal arch classification as well as WIfI or VSG risk score (9.8 OR vs 9.6 EVT, P = .673) could not detect significant differences as to both the groups. Treated median lesion length was significantly increased in OR patients (OR 26 cm vs EVT 7 cm, P < .001), whereas the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was higher in EVT patients (67% in EVT vs 40% OR, P = .023).

Conclusion:

OR and EVT showed comparable outcomes as to AFS and wound healing. Poor overall survival remains the determining factor in patients with ESRD having CLI. Both groups differ in terms of anatomic features as lesion length and severity of comorbidities; considering the comparable long-term outcomes, decision-making should be based on these premises; individually applied, each method can contribute to limb salvage, although the overall survival remains limited.

Predictors of early mortality and readmissions among dialysis patients undergoing lower extremity amputation

OBJECTIVE

Patients receiving dialysis are at increased risk for lower extremity amputations (LEAs) and postoperative morbidity. Limited studies have examined differences in 30-day outcomes of mortality and health care use after amputation or the preoperative factors that relate to worsened outcomes in dialysis patients. Our objective was to examine dialysis dependency and other preoperative factors associated with readmission or death after LEA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of dialysis-dependent and nondialysis patients undergoing major LEA in the 2012 to 2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Primary outcomes included death and hospital readmission within 30 days of amputation.

RESULTS

Of 6468 patients, 1166 (18%) were dialysis dependent. The dialysis cohort had more blacks (39% vs 23%), diabetes (76% vs 58%), below-knee amputations (62% vs 55%), and in-hospital deaths (8% vs 3%; all P < .001). The 30-day postoperative death rates (15% vs 7%) and readmission rates (35% vs 20% per 30 person-days; both P < .001) were higher in dialysis patients. Among the live discharges, the rate of any readmission or death within 30 days from amputation was highest in those aged ≥50 years (40% per 30 person-days). Multivariable analyses in the dialysis cohort revealed increased age, above-knee amputation, decreased physical status, heart failure, high preoperative white blood cell count, and low platelet count to be associated with death (P < .05; C statistic, 0.75). The only preoperative factor associated with readmission in dialysis patients was race (P = .04; C statistic, 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission or death after amputation is increased among dialysis patients. Predicting which dialysis patients are at highest risk for death is feasible, whereas predicting which will require readmission is less so. Risk factor identification may improve risk stratification, inform reimbursement policies, and allow targeted interventions to improve outcomes.

Nationwide Trends in Hospital Outcomes and Utilization After Lower Limb Revascularization in Patients on Hemodialysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the temporal trends and outcomes of endovascular and surgical revascularization in a large, nationally representative sample of patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis hospitalized for peripheral artery disease (PAD).

BACKGROUND

PAD is prevalent among patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of information on trends in endovascular and surgical revascularization and post-procedure outcomes in this population.

METHODS

We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2002 to 2012) to identify hemodialysis patients undergoing endovascular or surgical procedures for PAD using diagnostic and procedural codes. We compared trends in amputation, post-procedure complications, mortality, length of stay, and costs between the 2 groups using trend tests and logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 77,049 endovascular and 29,556 surgical procedures for PAD in hemodialysis patients. Trend analysis showed that endovascular procedures increased by nearly 3-fold, whereas there was a reciprocal decrease in surgical revascularization. Post-procedure complication rates were relatively stable in persons undergoing endovascular procedures but nearly doubled in those undergoing surgery. Surgery was associated with 1.8 times adjusted odds (95% confidence interval: 1.60 to 2.02) for complications and 1.6 times the adjusted odds for amputations (95% confidence interval: 1.40 to 1.75) but had similar mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 0.85 to 1.29) compared with endovascular procedures. Length of stay for endovascular procedures remained stable, whereas a decrease was seen for surgical procedures. Overall costs increased marginally for both procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of endovascular procedures have increased, whereas those of surgeries have decreased. Surgical revascularization is associated with higher odds of overall complications. Further prospective studies and clinical trials are required to analyze the relationship between the severity of PAD and the revascularization strategy chosen.

Hemodialysis patients have worse outcomes after infrageniculate revascularization procedures

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis (HD) has been shown to be an independent predictor of poor outcomes after femoropopliteal revascularization procedures in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. However, HD patients tend to have isolated infrageniculate disease, an anatomic risk factor for inferior patency. We aimed to compare outcomes for HD versus non-HD patients after infrageniculate open lower extremity bypass (LEB) and endovascular peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs).

METHODS

Data from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database (2008-2014) were analyzed. All patients undergoing infrageniculate LEB or PVI for rest pain or tissue loss were included. One-year primary patency (PP), secondary patency (SP), and major amputation outcomes were analyzed for HD versus non-HD patients stratified by treatment approach using both univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 1688 patients were included, including 348 patients undergoing LEB (HD = 44 versus non-HD = 304) and 1340 patients undergoing PVI (HD = 223 versus non-HD = 1117). Patients on HD more frequently underwent revascularization for tissue loss (89% versus 77%, P < 0.001) and had ≥2 comorbidities (91% versus 76%, P < 0.001). Among patients undergoing LEB, 1-y PP (66% versus 69%) and SP (71% versus 78%) were similar for HD versus non-HD (P ≥ 0.25) groups, but major amputations occurred more frequently in the HD group (27% versus 14%; P = 0.03). Among patients undergoing PVI, 1-y PP (70% versus 78%) and SP (82% versus 90%) were lower and the frequency of major amputations was higher (27% versus 10%) for HD patients (all, P ≤ 0.02). After correcting for baseline differences between the groups, outcomes were similar for HD versus non-HD patients undergoing LEB (P ≥ 0.21) but persistently worse for HD patients undergoing PVI (all, P ≤ 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

HD is an independent predictor of poor patency and higher risk of major amputation after infrageniculate endovascular revascularization procedures for the treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The use of endovascular interventions in these higher risk patients is not associated with improved limb salvage outcomes and may be an inappropriate use of healthcare resources.

Hybrid Operations in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

In this seminar, I would like to discuss the recent hybrid operations in patients with peripheral arterial diseases. Hybrid is generally defined as combinations of different types of things. In the surgical community, it is loosely defined as therapy combining open surgery (OS) and endovascular therapy (EVT). In practice, combination surgery of diseased inflow vessels by EVT and outflow vessels by OS is a typical example, namely, the combination therapy of thromboendarterectomy (TEA) for common femoral artery and EVT (PTA and stenting) for iliac artery in patients with PAD (ilio-femoral lesions). Also, there is the potential of various combinations of OS and EVT for complex lesions. Unfortunately, we do not have specific guidelines for hybrid therapy of PAD, but in clinical practices, justified decision-making for surgical indication is strictly required. I emphasize that the cardiovascular surgeon (or vascular specialist) must have the ability of decision-making for suitable combination therapy of OS and EVT which adheres to existing specific guidelines. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2017; 26: 275-283.).

Impact of Chronic Renal Failure on Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Subgroup Analysis from Zilver PTX Post-Market Surveillance Study in Japan

Purpose

Favorable long-term outcomes of the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (DES) in femoropopliteal lesions have been demonstrated. Chronic renal failure (CRF) has been shown to be a risk factor for restenosis and decreased limb salvage. The results of the DES in patients with CRF have not previously been reported. This study compares the results with the DES in patients with CRF and those without CRF.

Methods

This retrospective analysis from the Zilver PTX Japan Post-Market Surveillance Study included 321 patients with CRF and 584 patients without CRF. Outcomes included freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and patency.

Results

Of the patients included in this subgroup analysis, 2-year data were available for 209 patients in the CRF group and 453 patients in the non-CRF group. The two groups were similar in terms of lesion length and the frequency of in-stent restenosis. Critical limb ischemia, severe calcification, and diabetes were more common in patients with CRF, whereas total occlusion was more common in patients without CRF. Freedom from TLR rates were 81.4 versus 84.9% (p = 0.24), and patency rates were 70.7 versus 70.3% (p = 0.95) in patients with and without CRF at 2 years, respectively.

Conclusion

This is the first comparative study of the DES in femoropopliteal artery lesions in patients with and without CRF. These results indicate that the DES placed in femoropopliteal artery lesions of CRF patients is safe and effective with similar patency and TLR rates to patients without CRF.

Level of Evidence

Level 3, Post-Market Surveillance Study.

Outcomes of Isolated Tibial Endovascular Intervention for Rest Pain in Patients on Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Tibial interventions for critical limb ischemia are frequent in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) presenting with critical ischemia. The aim of this study was to examine impact of ESRD on the patient-centered outcomes following tibial endovascular Intervention for rest pain.

METHODS

A database of patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular interventions between 2006 and 2016 was retrospectively queried. Patients with rest pain (Rutherford 4) were identified. Patients with claudication (Rutherford 1 to 3) and tissue loss (Rutherford 5 and 6) were excluded. Patients were categorized by the presence or absence of ESRD. Patient-orientated outcomes of clinical efficacy (CE; absence of recurrent symptoms, maintenance of ambulation, and absence of major amputation), amputation-free survival (AFS; survival without major amputation), and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALEs; above ankle amputation of the index limb or major reintervention new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 829 patients (56% male, average age 59 years; 658 nonhemodialysis [non-HD] and 171 HD) underwent isolated tibial intervention in one leg for rest pain. Technical success was 99% with a median of 2 vessels treated per patient. There was no difference in the distribution of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus I lesions, but both the modified Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) runoff score and the pedal runoff score were worse in the HD group. The 30-day major adverse cardiac events and 30-day MALEs were equivalent in both groups. CE was 38 ± 9% and 19 ± 8% at 5 years for the non-HD and HD groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Overall, AFS was 45 ± 8% and 18 ± 9% at 5 years for the non-HD and HD groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Freedom from MALE was 41 ± 9% and 21 ± 8% at 5 years for the non-HD and HD groups, respectively (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ESRD who present with rest pain have equivalent short-term outcomes to those not on dialysis but do not achieve long-term satisfactory CE and AFS after isolated tibial intervention for rest pain.

Current Perspective on Hemodialysis Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

The prevalence of peripheral artery disease is substantially higher in patients on chronic hemodialysis than in the general population. The presence of calcified lesions characteristic of hemodialysis patients has an adverse influence on the initial success and long-term outcomes of both surgical bypass and endovascular therapy. Although the selection of revascularization strategy depends on whether an autologous vein is available and if the patient has a life expectancy of at least two years, it is difficult to predict the life expectancy in a real-world clinical situation. Endovascular therapy may be appropriate for many hemodialysis patients with poor general condition because of the high risk of perioperative complications and the poor long-term prognosis. Deciding which treatment option is more appropriate should be done on a case-by-case basis, especially in hemodialysis patients with critical limb ischemia.

Outcomes and Influence of the Pedal Arch in Below-the-Knee Angioplasty in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Management of dialysis patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) still represents a challenge to vascular medicine, whereas the effects of the pedal arch quality in these patients with predominant affection of the infrapopliteal vessels have rarely been evaluated. Therefore, our aim was to analyze the outcomes of infrapopliteal angioplasty in the setting of chronic renal failure (end-stage renal disease) and evaluate the influence of the pedal arch involvement on clinical success.

METHODS

Prospective follow-up of 32 ERSD patients on hemodialysis (mean age, 72 years) with CLI and consecutive infrapopliteal angioplasty over a 5-year period 2010-2014 was performed. Mean follow-up was 10 months (range, 0-51 months). Statistical end points were defined for amputation-free survival, overall survival, and wound healing. Each patient's pedal arch was classified in 4 categories according to patency on completion angiography and the influence of the pedal arch quality on end points was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 vessels in 32 ischemic legs were treated. Technical success was achieved in 96% of patients, no major complications were observed. A 30-day mortality rate amounted 6% with no procedure-related deaths. The 1-year amputation-free survival rate was 56% and 34% at 2 years. Two major amputations were required. Subsequent revascularization procedures were necessary in 11 patients (10 redo angioplasty, 1 pedal bypass graft). The pedal arch was classified as category I in 1 patient (3%), category IIa in 12 (38%), IIb in 3 (9%), and III in 16 patients (50%). No statistical significant differences in terms of survival or wound-healing rate were observed between those groups, and the pedal arch quality had no impact on predefined end points.

CONCLUSIONS

End-stage renal disease patients represent a subgroup with poor prognosis of limb salvage in CLI. Amputation-free survival remains poor and based on these data, an endovascular therapy is feasible and safe in these highly multimorbid patients. The quality of the pedal arch was not found to have any impact on wound healing or survival in the present study.

Epidemiology of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia

With a rise in the aging popluation, the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is markedly increasing. The overall disease prevalence of PAD is in the range of 3%-10%, which increases to 15%-20% in persons older than 70 years of age. Given this upward trend in disease prevalence, the economic and societal burden of PAD would be considerable. The subgroup of patients who develop critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents the most challenging population to manage medically, surgically, and endovascularly. Patients with symptomatic PAD and CLI have an increased risk for death and cardiovascular events, especially in those with CLI who carry with them a substantial risk of limb loss. Advances in medical, surgical, and endovascular techniques have shown excellent outcomes in the treatment of these patients, however the optimal management paradigm has not been elucidated. This article reviews the classification and epidemiology, risk factors, natural history, and health care costs associated with PAD and CLI.