Outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts with or without intervention before successful use

Single or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Improves One-Year Arteriovenous Graft Patency and Overall Survival

BACKGROUND

Following new dialysis access creation there is no consensus on the optimal use of anti-thrombotic therapy. Recent studies have suggested that single antiplatelet therapy may improve hospital mortality as well as patency. The aim of this study was to assess the role of different antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies on outcomes following dialysis access creation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted utilizing patients from the Vascular Quality Initiative who underwent AV fistula (AVF) and AV graft (AVG) creation from 2011-2023. Patients who were antiplatelet and anticoagulation naive were separated into 4 cohorts: no antiplatelet (No APT), single antiplatelet (SAPT), dual antiplatelet (DAPT), and aspirin with anticoagulation (ASA + AC). Univariate Kaplan-Meier (KM) and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to assess overall survival, primary patency, and secondary patency.

RESULTS

49,980 patients with AVF creation and 12,688 patients with AVG creation were identified. AVG patients had improved 1-year primary patency with SAPT compared to No APT (48% vs. 44%, P = 0.03) on KM analysis. No difference on KM analysis was observed for AVF. Regression analysis showed decreased risk of loss of primary patency for AVF (HR 0.90, CI 0.83-0.97, P = 0.009). AVG with SAPT showed decreased risk of mortality (HR 0.80, CI 0.64-1.00, P = 0.05) and decreased risk of loss of primary patency (HR 0.80, CI 0.67-0.94, P = 0.009). DAPT also showed decreased risk of loss of primary patency for AVG (HR 0.64, CI 0.43-0.95, P = 0.028). Survival was worse for both AVF and AVG patients on ASA + AC on KM analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Single antiplatelet therapy following access creation improves primary patency for both AVF and AVG, as well as overall survival for those with AVG. DAPT may further improve primary patency in those with AVG. The use of anticoagulation shows no clear benefit and may be harmful, however is more likely to reflect higher risk patients with other co-morbidities. These results suggest that following an AVF one should consider discharging patients on SAPT, and following an AVG one should consider SAPT or DAPT.

Computer-assisted image analysis of preexisting histological patterns of the cephalic vein to predict wrist arteriovenous fistula non-maturation

BACKGROUND

We used computer-assisted image analysis to determine whether preexisting histological features of the cephalic vein influence the risk of non-maturation of wrist fistulas.

METHODS

This study focused on patients aged 20-80 years who underwent their first wrist fistula creation. A total of 206 patients participated, and vein samples for Masson's trichrome staining were collected from 134 patients. From these, 94 patients provided a complete girth of the venous specimen for automatic image analysis. Maturation was assessed using ultrasound within 90 days after surgery.

RESULTS

The collagen to muscle ratio in the target vein, measured by computer-assisted imaging, was a strong predictor of non-maturation in wrist fistulas. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.864 (95% confidence interval of 0.782-0.946, p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value for the ratio was 1.138, as determined by the Youden index maximum method, with a sensitivity of 89.0% and specificity of 71.4%. For easy application, we used a cutoff value of 1.0; the non-maturation rates for patients with ratios >1 and ≤ 1 were 51.7% (15 out of 29 patients) and 9.2% (6 out of 65 patients), respectively. Chi-square testing revealed significantly different non-maturation rates between the two groups (X2 (1, N = 94) = 20.9, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Computer-assisted image interpretation can help to quantify the preexisting histological patterns of the cephalic vein, while the collagen-to-muscle ratio can predict non-maturation of wrist fistula development at an early stage.

The Role of Duplex Ultrasound and Flow/Pressure Ratio in Predicting Invasive Treatment for High Venous Pressure in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

Background and Objectives: Vascular access complications, particularly high venous pressure, pose significant challenges for hemodialysis patients undergoing hemodialysis. Limited research has focused on identifying predictive factors for invasive treatment. This study aimed to identify patients who might benefit from frequent monitoring and conservative management based on duplex ultrasound (DUS) evaluation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 72 hemodialysis patients with high venous pressure who underwent DUS. Patients were divided into conservative (n = 26) and invasive treatment groups (n = 46). Key factors such as flow/pressure ratio, blood flow, and venous pressure were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for invasive treatment, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to establish the optimal cutoff for the flow/pressure ratio. Results: Three months after the DUS, 3.85% of the conservative group experienced access failure, compared to 71.7% in the invasive group. The flow/pressure ratio was significantly lower in the invasive group (1.28 ± 0.26 vs. 1.47 ± 0.23, p < 0.05). A higher flow/pressure ratio (OR: 0.063, 95% CI: 0.004-0.932, p = 0.044) and the presence of tortuous veins (OR: 0.080, 95% CI: 0.007-0.897, p = 0.0405) were associated with a lower risk of invasive treatment. ROC analysis showed a flow/pressure ratio cutoff of 1.38 (AUC: 0.706, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Duplex ultrasound plays a crucial role in evaluating arterio-venous access in patients with high venous pressure. It provides a non-invasive assessment of vascular complications, helping avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. The flow/pressure ratio is significantly associated with the risk of invasive treatment, providing a valuable threshold for assessing risk and guiding clinical decision-making to optimize treatment strategies.

Surgical and endovascular assisted maturation procedures improve cannulation after arteriovenous fistula creation, but not after arteriovenous graft placement

OBJECTIVE

After creation, arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) can undergo surgical or endovascular assisted maturation (AM) procedures to enable use for hemodialysis. We sought to explore the association of interventions with successful two-needle cannulation (TNC) using the United States Renal Data System (USRDS).

METHODS

Using the 2012-2017 USRDS, we identified patients initiating hemodialysis with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC). Successful AVF/G use was defined as two-needle cannulation (TNC). Our principal outcome was time to first TNC after AVF/G creation. Death and new access placement were competing events that precluded TNC. Competing-risks regression models were constructed to identify factors associated with cannulation. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between AM procedures and 1-year TNC and also to compare post-cannulation outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 81,143 patients, 15,880 (19.6%) had AVG and 65,263 (80.4%) had AVF. AVG patients were more likely than AVF patients to achieve TNC at 1 year on unadjusted (77.4% vs 64.0%, p < 0.001) and on multivariate analysis (sHR = 2.56 (2.49-2.63), p < 0.001). For AVFs, one AM surgical procedure was associated with improved 1-year TNC rates, but further revisions were not helpful. Endovascular AM procedures were associated with increased AVF TNC rates. Any procedure, surgical or endovascular, was detrimental to achieving TNC for AVGs.Following initial TNC, those accesses that needed AM procedures were associated with higher rates of access failure (AVF: OR = 1.32 (1.21-1.45); AVG: OR = 1.77 (1.500-2.00); p < 0.001), catheter replacement (AVF: OR = 1.27 (1.20-1.34); AVG: OR = 1.56 (1.42-1.71), p < 0.001), and additional endovascular procedures (AVF: 0.75 ± 1.22 no AM vs 1.33 ± 1.62 any AM; AVG: 1.31 ± 1.77 no AM vs 1.96 ± 2.22 any AM; all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AVG achieved TNC after creation more reliably than AVF. A single surgery or endovascular procedures for AVFs is associated with greater rates of TNC. For AVGs, any AM procedure is associated with lower cannulation rates, and reinforces the need for careful operative technique.

Prospective multicenter study of a novel endovascular venous anastomotic procedure and device for implantation of an arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

The traditional sutured venous anastomosis used during arteriovenous graft implantation is associated with a high incidence of subsequent stenosis that is attributed to neointimal hyperplasia. Hyperplasia results from multiple factors, including hemodynamic abnormalities and vessel trauma during implantation. A novel anastomotic connector device was designed to provide an alternative, less traumatic, endovascular venous anastomosis that may ameliorate the clinical challenges associated with a sutured anastomosis. A prospective single-arm multicenter study was performed to evaluate safety and effectiveness of graft implantation using the study device.

METHODS

Patients requiring graft creation and who met the study criteria were enrolled between February 2018 and July 2021 and observed for 6 months. Collected data included baseline characteristics, graft patency and use for hemodialysis, graft interventions, and adverse events. The primary study endpoint was cumulative graft patency, compared to a pre-specified Performance Goal of 75%. Secondary endpoints included primary unassisted patency and serious adverse events, defined as the occurrence of death, graft infection, emergent surgery, significant bleeding, and pseudoaneurysm.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were enrolled from 10 study sites, among which 144 subjects were evaluable at 6 months and 14 were censored with partial follow-up observation. Three patients died and the graft was abandoned in 12. The primary endpoint was met (p-value < 0.001). By Kaplan Meier survival analysis, cumulative patency was 92.08% with a lower 95% Confidence Bound of 86.98%. Primary unassisted patency was 60.21% with a lower 95% Confidence Bound of 50.84%. Graft infections occurred in six patients, all unrelated to the study device. There were no reports of emergent surgery, significant bleeding or pseudoaneurysm.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that the study device can be used for successful endovascular anastomosis of a vein to a graft for hemodialysis, with acceptable cumulative patency and safety profile at 6 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02532621.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of autogenous arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, and tunneled-cuffed catheter for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage kidney disease in Southern China

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three permanent vascular accesses for maintenance hemodialysis patients from a hospital perspective throughout 5 years, which is the average life expectancy of patients with end-stage kidney disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We conducted a EuroQol(EQ-5D) questionnaire survey between January 2021 and March 2021 with 250 patients to estimate the health utility of various states in patients under different hemodialysis vascular access. We designed a Markov model and conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the cost-effectiveness of three hemodialysis vascular access in Guangzhou throughout 5 years.

RESULTS

The mean costs were US$44,481 with tunneled-cuffed catheter (TCC), and US$68,952 and US$59,247 with arteriovenous graft (AVG) and autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF), respectively. The mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was 1.41 with TCC, and 2.37 and 2.73 with AVG and AVF, respectively. AVG had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$25,491 per QALY over TCC; AVF had an ICER of -US$26,958 per QALY over AVG. At a willingness to pay below US$10,633.8 per QALY, TCC is likely the most cost-effective vascular access. At any willingness to pay between US$10,633.8 and US$30,901.4 per QALY, AVF is likely the most cost-effective vascular access.

CONCLUSION

These findings illustrate the value of AVF given its relative cost-effectiveness to other hemodialysis modalities. Although AVG costs much more than TCC for slightly higher QALYs than TCC, AVG still has a greater advantage over TCC for patients with longer life expectancy due to its lower probability of death.

Comparing post-maturation outcomes of arteriovenous grafts and fistulae

BACKGROUND

Though arteriovenous grafts (AVG) mature more reliably than arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and require fewer maturation procedures (MP) to obtain functional patency, AVG are thought to have worse function after maturation. We explored differences in post-maturation outcomes between the following groups: AVF patients who did (AS-AVF) and did not (unAS-AVF) require assisted maturation and AVG patients who did (AS-AVG) and did not (unAS-AVG) require assisted maturation.

METHODS

Using the US Renal Data System (2012-2017), we retrospectively identified patients who initiated dialysis with a central venous catheter, underwent AVF or AVG placement and achieved successful two-needle cannulation. Primary patency and access abandonment after maturation were compared across groups using competing risks regression methods, generating sub-hazards ratios (sHR).

RESULTS

We identified 42,664 AVF and 12,335 AVG that met inclusion criteria. A larger proportion of AVFs required interventions: 18,408 AVF (43.2%) versus 2594 AVG (21.0%; p < 0.01). Both AS-AVG and AS-AVF patients experienced patency loss at 1 year more frequently compared with unAS-AVG (67.5% & 57.5% vs 55.2% respectively). Patency loss was lowest in unAS-AVF (38.9%). These trends were robust on adjusted analysis (unAS-AVG reference, AS-AVG sHR = 1.44, p < 0.01; AS-AVF sHR = 1.08, p < 0.01, unAS-AVF sHR = 0.67, p < 0.01). AS-AVGs were more likely to be abandoned than unAS-AVGs (11.7% unAS-AVG vs 17.2% AS-AVG). Fistulae, assisted or not, had lower unadjusted rates of 1-year abandonment than grafts (8.9% AS-AVF vs 7.3% unAS-AVF). On adjusted analysis, AVF usage was protective against abandonment (unAS-AVG, reference; AS-AVF sHR = 0.67, p < 0.01; unAS-AVF sHR = 0.59, p < 0.01) while AS-AVG was not (AS-AVG sHR = 1.32, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

unAS-AVF have the best long-term outcomes. AS-AVF lose primary patency at a higher rate than unAS-AVG. AVGs may be a better choice than AVFs if veins are marginal and likely to require assisted maturation. Further research is needed to identify anatomic and physiologic factors that affect long-term performance and influence conduit choice.

Assessing Time to Removal of Tunneled Dialysis Catheters after Arteriovenous Access Creation

BACKGROUND

Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) are a temporary bridge until definitive arteriovenous (AV) access is established. Our objective was to evaluate the time to TDC removal in patients who underwent AV access creations with TDCs already in place.

METHODS

A single-center analysis of all AV access creations in patients with TDCs was performed (2014-2020). Primary outcome was time to TDC removal after access creation.

RESULTS

There were 364 AV access creations with TDCs in place. The average age was 58 years, 44% of patients were female, and 64% were Black. The median time to TDC removal was 113 days (range, 22-931 days) with 71.4% having a TDC >90 days after access creation. Patients with TDC >90 days were often older (60 vs. 54.7), had hypertension (98.1% vs. 93.3%), were diabetic (65.4% vs. 47.1%), and had longer average time to maturation (107.1 vs. 55.4 days, P < 0.001) and first access (114 vs. 59.4 days, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that older age was associated with prolonged TDC placement (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05, P = 0.005) and prosthetic graft use was associated with shorter TDC indwelling time (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.23, P ≤ 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 87% of TDCs were removed at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with TDCs who underwent AV access creation had prolonged TDC placement. Prosthetic graft use was associated with shorter catheter times. Close follow-up after access placement, improving maturation times, and access type selection should be considered to shortened TDC times.

Predialysis Vascular Access Placement and Catheter Use at Hemodialysis Initiation

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines encourage placement of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula in patients with advanced CKD to avoid initiation of hemodialysis with a central venous catheter. However, the relative merits of predialysis placement of an AV fistula or graft have been poorly studied.

METHODS

This study included 380 patients (mean age 59±14 years, 73% Black patients, 51% male) from a large academic medical center who underwent predialysis placement of an AV fistula (286) or AV graft (94). The study quantified three end points: time from access placement to initiation of dialysis, likelihood of starting hemodialysis without a catheter, and number of vascular access procedures before dialysis initiation.

RESULTS

The eGFR at access surgery was <10, 10-14, and ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 in 87 (23%), 179 (47%), and 114 (30%) patients, respectively. The median time from access surgery to hemodialysis initiation was 69, 156, and 429 days in patients with an eGFR of <10, 10-14, and ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively ( P < 0.001). Hemodialysis was initiated within 2 years of access surgery in 298 (78%) of the patients. Catheter-free hemodialysis initiation was higher in patients with an AV graft versus an AV fistula when the eGFR was <10 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (88% versus 43%; odds ratio [OR], 9.10 [95% confidence interval, 2.74 to 26.4]) and when the eGFR was 10-14 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (88% versus 54%; OR, 6.05 [2.35 to 15.0]) but similar when the eGFR was ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (90% versus 75%; OR, 3.00 [0.48 to 34.9]). Patients undergoing an AV fistula were more likely to undergo an angioplasty (11% versus 0%, P < 0.001), surgical access revision (26% versus 8%, P < 0.001), a second access placement (16% versus 6%, P = 0.02), and a catheter insertion (32% versus 11%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD undergoing vascular access surgery when their eGFR was <15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , catheter use at dialysis initiation was much less likely when an AV graft, rather than an AV fistula, was placed.

Practice of dialysis access interventional nephrology procedures in the Asia-Pacific region: Getting lay of the land

AIM

This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine the prevalence of Interventional Nephrology (IN) practice amongst nephrologists in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR), specifically related to dialysis access (DA).

METHODS

The Association of VA and intervenTionAl Renal physicians (AVATAR) Foundation from India conducted a multinational online survey amongst nephrologists from the Asia-Pacific to determine the practice of IN in the planning, creation, and management of dialysis access. The treatment modalities, manpower and equipment availability, monthly cost of treatment, specifics of dialysis access interventions, and challenges in the training and practice of IN by nephrologists were included in the survey.

RESULTS

Twenty-one countries from the APR participated in the survey. Nephrologists from 18 (85.7%) countries reported performing at least one of the basic dialysis access-related IN procedures, primarily the placement of non-tunnelled central catheters (n-TCC; 71.5%). Only 10 countries (47.6%) reported having an average of <4% of nephrologists performing any of the advanced IN access procedures, the most common being the placement of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter (20%). Lack of formal training (57.14%), time (42.8%), incentive (38%), institutional support (38%), medico-legal protection (28.6%), and prohibitive cost (23.8%) were the main challenges to practice IN. The primary obstacles to implementing the IN training were a lack of funding and skilled personnel.

CONCLUSION

The practice of dialysis access-related IN in APR is inadequate, mostly due to a lack of training, backup support, and economic constraints, whereas training in access-related IN is constrained by a lack of a skilled workforce and finances.

Functional patency rates of arteriovenous fistula of a retrospective cohort study from one of the biggest centers in Canada

BACKGROUND

The main barriers to arterio-venous fistula (AVF) utilization are primary failure, long maturation duration, and low secondary patency rates.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, primary, secondary, functional primary, and functional secondary patency rates were calculated and compared between two age groups (< 75 years and >  = 75 years) and between radiocephalic (RC-) and upper arm (UA-) AVFs, and factors determining the duration of functional secondary patency were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2020, 206 predialysis patients whose AVFs had been created previously initiated renal replacement treatment. RC-AVFs comprised 23.3% and were created after favorable analysis of the forearm vasculature. Overall, the primary failure rate was 8.3, and 84.7% started hemodialysis with a functioning AVF. Functional secondary patency rates of primary AVFs were better with RC-AVFs [1,3 and 5 year rates of 95.8, 81.9 and 81.9% versus 83.4, 71.8 and 59.2% for UA-AVFs (log rank p: 0.041)]. There was no difference between the two age groups for any of the AVF outcomes assessed. Among patients whose AVF was abandoned, 40.3% had gone on to have a second fistula created. This was significantly less likely in the older group (p < 0.01).

IN CONCLUSION

(1) UA-AVFs were placed more commonly than RC-AVFs; (2) a selection bias existed whereby RC-AVFs were only created after favorable forearm vasculature was demonstrated or suspected; (3) superior functional secondary patency rates were observed with RC-AV's, perhaps stemming from this selection bias; (4) the elderly were more likely to have only one AVF creation attempt.

Early clinical experience and comparison between percutaneous and surgical arteriovenous fistula

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) has been recently developed as an alternative to surgical AVF (sAVF). We report our experience with pAVF in comparison with a contemporaneous sAVF group.

METHODS

Charts of all 51 patients with pAVF performed at our institution were analyzed retrospectively, in addition to 51 randomly selected contemporaneous patients with sAVF (2018-2022) with available follow-up. Outcomes of interest were (i) procedural success rate, (ii) number of maturation procedures required, (iii) fistula maturation rates, and (iv) rates of tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) removal. For patients on hemodialysis (HD), sAVF and pAVF were considered mature when the AVF was used for HD. For patients not on HD, pAVF were considered mature if flow rates of ≥500 mL/min were documented in superficial venous outflow; for sAVF, documentation of maturity based on clinical criteria was required.

RESULTS

Compared patients with sAVF, patients with pAVF were more likely to be male (78% vs 57%; P = .033) and less likely to have congestive heart failure (10% vs 43%; P < .001) and coronary artery disease (18% vs 43%; P = .009). Procedural success was achieved in 50 patients with pAVF (98%). Fistula angioplasties (60% vs 29%; P = .002) and ligation (24% vs 2%; P = .001) or embolization (22% vs 2%; P = .002) of competing outflow veins were more frequently performed on patients with pAVF. The surgical cohort had more planned transpositions (39% vs 6%; P < .001). When all maturation interventions were combined, pAVF required more maturation procedures, but this was not statistically significant (76% vs 53%; P = .692). When planned second-stage transpositions were excluded, pAVF had a statistically significant higher rate of maturation procedures (74% vs 24%; P < .001). Overall, 36 pAVF (72%) and 29 sAVF (57%) developed mature fistulas. This difference, however, was not statistically significant (P = .112). At the time of AVF creation, 26 patients with pAVF and 40 patients with sAVF were on HD, all through use of a TDC. Catheter removal was recorded in 15 patients with pAVF (58%) and 18 patients with sAVF (45%) (P = .314). The mean time until TDC removal in pAVF group was 146 ± 74 days, compared with 175 ± 99 in the sAVF group (P = .341).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with sAVF, rates of maturation after pAVF seem to be similar, but this result may be related to the higher intensity of maturation procedures and patient selection. An analysis of appropriately matched patients will assist in elucidating the possible role of pAVF vis-a-vis sAVF.

Placing an appropriate tunneled dialysis catheter in an appropriate patient including the nonconventional sites

Hemodialysis remains the most frequently chosen kidney replacement modality across the world. A well-functioning dialysis vascular access is critical to providing successful dialysis therapy. Despite its drawbacks, central venous catheter is commonly used as a vascular access to initiate hemodialysis therapy in acute and chronic settings. The growing recognition of providing patient centric care and per recommendations from the recently published Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Vascular Access Guidelines, selecting the appropriate patient population for a central venous catheter placement involves implementing the End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) Life-Plan strategy. The current review examines the circumstances and challenges that increasingly lead to the hemodialysis catheter being the default and the only available choice for patients. The current review outlines the clinical scenarios for selecting an appropriate patient for hemodialysis catheter use for short-term or long-term needs. The review further discusses clinical pointers to assist with the decision-making process on estimation on prospective catheter length selection, particularly in the intensive care unit setting without the aid of conventional fluoroscopic guidance. A hierarchy of conventional and non-conventional access sites is proposed based on KDOQI guidance and multi-disciplinary author experience. Non-conventional sites are reviewed, including complications and technical guidance, for trans-lumbar IVC, trans-hepatic, trans-renal, and other exotic sites.

Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Membranes for Vascular Stent Coating: Manufacturing, Biomedical and Surgical Applications, Innovations and Case Reports

Coated stents are defined as innovative stents surrounded by a thin polymer membrane based on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)useful in the treatment of numerous vascular pathologies. Endovascular methodology involves the use of such devices to restore blood flow in small-, medium- and large-calibre arteries, both centrally and peripherally. These membranes cross the stent struts and act as a physical barrier to block the growth of intimal tissue in the lumen, preventing so-called intimal hyperplasia and late stent thrombosis. PTFE for vascular applications is known as expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and it can be rolled up to form a thin multilayer membrane expandable by 4 to 5 times its original diameter. This membrane plays an important role in initiating the restenotic process because wrapped graft stent could be used as the treatment option for trauma devices during emergency situations and to treat a number of pathological vascular disease. In this review, we will investigate the multidisciplinary techniques used for the production of e-PTFE membranes, the advantages and disadvantages of their use, the innovations and the results in biomedical and surgery field when used to cover graft stents.

Percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Currently, percutaneous endovascular creation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) shows excellent outcomes. However, few systematic research evidence to support clinical decision making on the benefit of endovascular AVF is available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular AVF (endoAVF) in patients with renal failure.

Methods

We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies on endovascular or endovascular versus surgery for the creation of AVF. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by Review Manager 5.4 software (Revman, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom) and Stata 15.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, United States).

Results

A total of 14 case series and 5 cohort studies, with 1,929 patients, were included in this study. The technique success was 98.00% for endoAVF (95% CI, 0.97–0.99; I² = 16.25%). There was no statistically significant difference in 3 cohort studies between endovascular and surgical AVF for procedural success (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.04–11.98; P = 0.80; I² = 53%). The maturation rates of endoAVF were 87.00% (95% CI, 0.79–0.93; I² = 83.96%), and no significant difference was observed in 3 cohort studies between the 2 groups (OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.20–2.63; P = 0.63; I² = 88%). Procedure-related complications for endoAVF was 7% (95% CI, 0.04–0.17; I² = 78.31%), and it did not show significant difference in 4 cohort studies between the 2 groups (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 0.37–9.16; P = 0.45; I² = 59%).

Conclusion

The endovascular creation of AVF is potentially effective and safe. These important data may provide evidence to support clinicians and patients in making decisions with endovascular AVF. But further research is great necessary due to lack of randomized controlled studies.

Iatrogenic Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients: An Alternative Approach to Thrombectomy of Arteriovenous Graft (AVG) Thrombosis

Arterial venous (AV) fistula is the first choice of vascular access to perform hemodialysis in the vast majority of suitable patients followed by arteriovenous grafts (AVG). An iatrogenic fistula can occur when a second vein adjacent to the graft is punctured and the needle traverses the vein. In normal circumstances, this has no clinical repercussions and does not need correction, and in prior reports, it has helped to maintain the patency of partially occluded grafts but rarely can lead to thrombosis of the graft due to reduced flow and pressure in the graft lumen. We report here what we believe is a unique approach to perform thrombectomy of an occluded graft in a 71-year-old patient on hemodialysis to avoid placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters and complications associated with catheters. When the outflow of basilic vein in this patient was thrombosed and could not be traversed, we successfully used an iatrogenic fistula as main outflow vein for the graft and created an alternative vein for drainage thus avoiding placement of a tunneled catheter for hemodialysis.

Point of Care Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pseudoaneurysm of an Upper Extremity Arteriovenous Dialysis Graft

We describe the rapid diagnosis with point of care ultrasound (POCUS) of two acute pseudoaneurysms of a bovine arteriovenous dialysis graft with superimposed cellulitis in a 44-year old male patient who presented with pain over his upper arm graft site. POCUS evaluation decreased the time to diagnosis and vascular surgery consultation.

Maturation and survival of arteriovenous fistula: The challenge starts from the preoperative assessment stage

BACKGROUND

It is necessary to assess the association between the preoperative indicators and the maturation and survival of arteriovenous fistula (AVF).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 236 patients with a new AVF created between 2016 and 2018 in our Dialysis Center.

RESULTS

Multivariate Logistic regression showed that preoperative arterial diameter (odds ratio [OR] = 1.452, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.233, 1.710], p < 0.001), preoperative venous diameter (OR = 1.296, 95% CI [1.166, 1.477], p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR = 1.187, 95% CI [1.103, 1.277], p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.245, 95% CI [0.107, 0.560], p = 0.01) were independent influential factors for AVF maturation. Two years after the AVF surgery follow-up, multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model showed that the preoperative arterial diameter (OR = 0.510, 95% CI [0.320, 0.813], p = 0.005), preoperative venous diameter (OR = 0.940, 95% CI [0.897, 0.985], p = 0.010) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.785, 95% CI [1.117, 2.855], p = 0.016) was prognostic factors of AVF survival. The Kaplan-Meier method showed that the primary survival of AVF in patients with different preoperative arterial diameter was statistically significant (log-rank χ²  = 15.415, p < 0.001), while the secondary survival was not statistically significant (log-rank χ²  = 0.131, p = 0.717).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, the preoperative arterial and venous diameter and diabetes mellitus were independent influential factors for AVF maturation and prognostic factors of AVF survival. However, the preoperative LVEF only associated with the maturation of AVF. Meanwhile, smaller arterial diameter (≤2.15 mm) was associated with AVF maturation failure, but did not impact secondary survival of AVF.

Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation, Functional Patency, and Intervention Rates

Importance

National initiatives have emphasized the use of autogenous arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis, but their purported benefits have been questioned.

Objective

To examine AVF usability, longer-term functional patency, and remedial procedures to facilitate maturation, manage complications, or maintain patency in the Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation (HFM) Study.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The HFM Study was a multicenter (n = 7) prospective National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases cohort study performed to identify factors associated with AVF maturation. A total of 602 participants were enrolled (dialysis, kidney failure: 380; predialysis, chronic kidney disease [CKD]: 222) with AVF maturation ascertained for 535 (kidney failure, 353; CKD, 182) participants.

Interventions

All clinical decisions regarding AVF management were deferred to the individual centers, but remedial interventions were discouraged within 6 weeks of creation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

In this case series analysis, the primary outcome was unassisted maturation. Functional patency, freedom from intervention, and participant survival were summarized using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

Most participants evaluated (n = 535) were men (372 [69.5%]) and had diabetes (311 [58.1%]); mean (SD) age was 54.6 (13.6) years. Almost two-thirds of the AVFs created (342 of 535 [64%]) were in the upper arm. The AVF maturation rates for the kidney failure vs CKD participants were 29% vs 10% at 3 months, 67% vs 38% at 6 months, and 76% vs 58% at 12 months. Several participants with kidney failure (133 [37.7%]) and CKD (63 [34.6%]) underwent interventions to facilitate maturation or manage complications before maturation. The median time from access creation to maturation was 115 days (interquartile range [IQR], 86-171 days) but differed by initial indication (CKD, 170 days; IQR, 113-269 days; kidney failure, 105 days; IQR, 81-137 days). The functional patency for the AVFs that matured at 1 year was 87% (95% CI, 83.2%-90.2%) and at 2 years, 75% (95% CI, 69.7%-79.7%), and there was no significant difference for those receiving interventions before maturation. Almost half (188 [47.5%]) of the AVFs that matured had further intervention to maintain patency or treat complications.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that AVF remains an accepted hemodialysis access option, although both its maturation and continued use require a moderate number of interventions to maintain patency and treat the associated complications.

Impact of arteriovenous fistulas versus arteriovenous grafts on vascular access performance in haemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the best-performing vascular access type for patients undergoing haemodialysis. We aimed to compare outcomes of starting dialysis on arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) versus arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of multiple electronic information sources and bibliographic reference lists. The following outcome parameters were evaluated at 1, 2 and 5 years: primary failure, defined as access never used for dialysis; primary patency, defined as intervention-free access survival; primary-assisted patency, defined as uninterrupted access survival with interventions; and secondary patency, defined as cumulative access survival.

RESULTS

We identified 15 comparative studies reporting a total of 118,434 patients who initiated haemodialysis with AVF (n = 95,143) or AVG (n = 23,291). Our analysis demonstrated that AVF was associated with significantly higher primary failure rate (OR: 2.05, p = .0005) but significantly higher rate of primary patency at 1 year (OR: 1.91, p < .00001), at 2 years (OR: 2.52, p < .00001) and at 5 years (OR: 2.59, p < .00001); and primary-assisted patency at 1 year (OR: 1.71, p < .00001), at 2 years (OR: 2.13, p < .00001) and 5 years (OR: 2.79, p < .00001). There was no significant difference in secondary patency at 1 year (OR: 1.08, p < .00001) but AVF had better secondary patency at 2 years (OR: 1.26, p < .00001) and 5 years (OR: 1.60, p < .00001) than AVG.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis of best available comparative evidence (Level 2) demonstrated that AVFs may be associated with significantly higher primary failure rate but higher primary patency, primary-assisted patency and secondary patency at 1, 2 and 5 years compared to AVGs. However, the available evidence is subject to significant selection bias and confounding by indication.

Research Priorities for Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula Creation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: Proceedings and Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Research Consensus Panel

Recently developed endovascular techniques to create percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas are an alternative to surgical arteriovenous fistula creation, although there is currently a lack of high-level evidence regarding their creation, maturation, utilization, and long-term function. Recognizing this, the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation sponsored a Research Consensus Panel and Summit for the prioritization of a research agenda to identify and address the gaps in current knowledge.

Outcomes and predictors of failure of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis

Purpose

Arteriovenous fistula(AVF) is preferred vascular access for hemodialysis but has primary failure in 20–60%. Studying predictors of AVF failure would help plan appropriate management.We studied AVF outcomes, clinical and vascular factors predicting their failure in patients requiring hemodialysis.

Methods

Retrospective study of patients with AVF creation from January 2017 to December 2018. Outcomes studied were immediate (< 72 h), primary (3 months) AVF failure, six-month/one-year patency, analyzed for predictive clinical, vascular factors as assessed using Pre-operative Doppler Ultrasound(DUS).

Results

Of 530 AVFs in 460 patients, DUS was done in 426/530 (80.4%), 349/460 (75.8%) were males, mean age was 53.10 ± 14.54 (18–91), 215/460(46.7%) had Diabetes mellitus(DM), 423/460(92%) hypertension. AVFs were radiocephalic in 79/530 (14.9%), brachiocephalic 418/530 (78.9%), brachiobasilic 33/530 (6.2%). AVF Immediate/Primary failure was seen in 64/530 (12.1%), 90/352 (25.6%); Patency at six months/one year in 253/352(71.8%),191/305 (62.6%), respectively. Older age had less immediate failures (AOR 0.97, CI 0.95–0.99, p 0.03). Feeding arterial diameter predicted immediate and primary failure on univariate analysis [OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49–0.83), 0.62 (95% CI 0.47–0.89), respectively], but not multivariate. Artery diameter of > 4.0 mm had less failures [immediate (p 0.01), primary (p 0.02)], < 2.0 mm had specificity 95.9% and 95.4% for immediate, primary failure respectively.

Conclusion

AVF failure is 12.1%, immediately; 25.6% three months after construction, Patency at 6 months is 71.8%, one year 62.6%. Immediate failures decrease with age. Artery diameters > 4.0 mm had less, < 2.0 mm had more failures.

Arteriovenous Vascular Access-Related Procedural Burden Among Incident Hemodialysis Patients in the United States

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

As the proportion of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) compared with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in the United States has increased, there has been a concurrent increase in interventions. We explored AVF and AVG maturation and maintenance procedural burden in the first year of hemodialysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Patients initiating hemodialysis from July 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014, and having a first-time AVF or AVG placement between dialysis initiation and 1 year (N = 73,027), identified using the US Renal Data System (USRDS).

PREDICTORS

Patient characteristics.

OUTCOME

Successful AVF/AVG use and intervention procedure burden.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

For each group, we analyzed interventional procedure rates during maturation maintenance phases using Poisson regression. We used proportional rate modeling for covariate-adjusted analysis of interventional procedure rates during the maintenance phase.

RESULTS

During the maturation phase, 13,989 of 57,275 patients (24.4%) in the AVF group required intervention, with therapeutic interventional requirements of 0.36 per person. In the AVG group 2,904 of 15,572 patients (18.4%) required intervention during maturation, with therapeutic interventional requirements of 0.28 per person. During the maintenance phase, in the AVF group 12,732 of 32,115 patients (39.6%) required intervention, with a therapeutic intervention rate of 0.93 per person-year. During maintenance phase, in the AVG group 5,928 of 10,271 patients (57.7%) required intervention, with a therapeutic intervention rate of 1.87 per person-year. For both phases, the intervention rates for AVF tended to be higher on the East Coast while those for AVG were more uniform geographically.

LIMITATIONS

This study relies on administrative data, with monthly recording of access use.

CONCLUSIONS

During maturation, interventions for both AVFs and AVGs were relatively common. Once successfully matured, AVFs had lower maintenance interventional requirements. During the maturation and maintenance phases, there were geographic variations in AVF intervention rates that warrant additional study.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Flixene Vascular Graft Used for Haemodialysis

Introduction

The Flixene™ vascular graft (Maquet-Atrium Medical, Hudson, NH) has emerged as a new generation synthetic graft, which allows for early needling for haemodialysis. Most studies have shown satisfactory early results. The aim of this study is to report on long-term outcomes of the Flixene graft over eight years in a cohort of patients.

Methods

From February 2011 to September 2019, 61 patients had 64 arteriovenous graft fistulas (AVGs) by using the Flixene grafts. The median patient age was 67 years; the male to female ratio was 30:31. Diabetes was the reason for the majority of kidney failures (57%). The configuration of the grafts used was mostly upper arm straight AVG. The primary patency rate, secondary patency rate, and surgical complications were assessed.

Results

In a median follow-up of three years (interquartile range (IQR): 2 - 6), 36 of the AVGs required a fistulogram. Venous side stenosis was the most common cause of high venous pressure or AVG occlusion in 97%. The one-year primary patency rate was 30%. The secondary patency rate was 94.8%, 83.7%, and 77.7% at one, three, and five years, respectively. The longest functional AVG was observed for up to seven years.

Conclusions

This study has shown satisfactory long-term results of the Flixene graft used for hemodialysis. The Flixene graft could be needled within 72 hours without increased complications, which allows the creation of an AVG under an emergency setting to avoid the placement of a central venous catheter (CVC). This strategy should be advocated in future clinical practice.

Initial Outcomes Following Introduction of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula Program with Comparison to Historical Surgically Created Fistulas

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been an abundance of encouraging data regarding the creation of percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas. Despite promising data regarding their clinical maturation, a paucity of data exists which provides direct comparison between percutaneously created AVFs (pAVF) and open surgically created AVFs (sAVF). This study has 2 primary objectives: First, to compare clinical outcomes of pAVFs to sAVFs, with emphasis on clinical maturation and frequency of postoperative interventions to facilitate maturation. Second, to contribute toward the evidence-based incorporation of the pAVF procedure into the hemodialysis access algorithm.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was performed on all consecutive patients undergoing surgically created brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BC-AVF, sAVF group) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 and Ellipsys-created percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF group) from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Comparative analysis between groups was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients underwent Ellipsys-created pAVF with mean age of 56.7 ± 22.6 years (12 males [50%], 12 females [50%]) and 62 patients underwent surgically created BC-AVF with mean age of 62.5 ± 13.2 years (32 males [52%], 30 females [48%]). Both the pAVF and sAVF groups had comparable mean operating times (60 ± 40 vs. 56 ± 25 min, P = 0.67) and frequency of procedural technical success (23 [96%] vs. 62 [100%], P = 0.28), respectively. The pAVF group had a lower clinical maturation rate (12 [52%] vs. 54 [87%], P = 0.003) and a higher primary failure rate (9 [39%] vs. 6 [10%], P = 0.003) when compared to the sAVF group. The pAVF group had an increased overall rate of undergoing a postoperative intervention (18 [78%] vs. 13 [21%], P< 0.001), as well as an increased number of total postoperative interventions (1.1 ± 0.9 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6 interventions, P< 0.001) compared to the sAVF group. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the juxta anastomotic segment was the most prevalent postoperative intervention performed in the pAVF group and occurred at a significantly increased frequency when compared to the sAVF group rate (13 [57%] vs. 5 [8%], P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our single-center retrospective review, patients undergoing Ellipsys-created pAVF in the first year following introduction of percutaneous endovascular had inferior rates of clinical maturation and underwent more postoperative interventions when compared to historical patients undergoing surgically created BC-AVF. Outcome discrepancies compared to previously reported Ellipsys data demonstrate a need for further studies examining the practical translatability of the pAVF.

Practice patterns of dialysis access and outcomes in patients wait-listed early for kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early kidney transplantation (KT) is the best option for patients with end-stage kidney disease, but little is known about dialysis access strategy in this context. We studied practice patterns of dialysis access and how they relate with outcomes in adults wait-listed early for KT according to the intended donor source.

METHODS

This study from the REIN registry (2002-2014) included 9331 incident dialysis patients (age 18-69) wait-listed for KT before or by 6 months after starting dialysis: 8342 candidates for deceased-donor KT and 989 for living-donor KT. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) of KT and death associated with hemodialysis by catheter or peritoneal dialysis compared with arteriovenous (AV) access were estimated with Fine and Gray models.

RESULTS

Living-donor candidates used pretransplant peritoneal dialysis at rates similar to deceased-donor KT candidates, but had significantly more frequent catheter than AV access for hemodialysis (adjusted OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.09-1.43). Over a median follow-up of 43 (IQR: 23-67) months, 6063 patients received transplants and 305 died before KT. Median duration of pretransplant dialysis was 15 (7-27) months for deceased-donor recipients and 9 (5-15) for living-donor recipients. Catheter use in deceased-donor candidates was associated with a lower SHR for KT (0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.94) and a higher SHR for death (1.53, 95%CI 1.14-2.04). Only five deaths occurred in living-donor candidates, three of them with catheter use.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant dialysis duration may be quite long even when planned with a living donor. Advantages from protecting these patients from AV fistula creation must be carefully evaluated against catheter-related risks.

Challenges and novel therapies for vascular access in haemodialysis

Advances in standards of care have extended the life expectancy of patients with kidney failure. However, options for chronic vascular access for haemodialysis - an essential part of kidney replacement therapy - have remained unchanged for decades. The high morbidity and mortality associated with current vascular access complications highlights an unmet clinical need for novel techniques in vascular access and is driving innovation in vascular access care. The development of devices, biological approaches and novel access techniques has led to new approaches to controlling fistula geometry and manipulating the underlying cellular and molecular pathways of the vascular endothelium, and influencing fistula maturation and formation through the use of external mechanical methods. Innovations in arteriovenous graft materials range from small modifications to the graft lumen to the creation of completely novel bioengineered grafts. Steps have even been taken to create new devices for the treatment of patients with central vein stenosis. However, these emerging therapies face difficult hurdles, and truly creative approaches to vascular access need resources that include well-designed clinical trials, frequent interaction with regulators, interventionalist education and sufficient funding. In addition, the heterogeneity of patients with kidney failure suggests it is unlikely that a 'one-size-fits-all' approach for effective vascular access will be feasible in the current environment.

Sex differences in the vascular access of hemodialysis patients: a cohort study

Background

We describe differences for probability of receiving a fistula attempt, achieving fistula use, remaining catheter-free and the rate of access-related procedures as a function of sex.

Methods

Prospectively collected vascular access data on incident dialysis patients from five Canadian programs using the Dialysis Measurement Analysis and Reporting System to determine differences in fistula-related outcomes between women and men. The probability of receiving a fistula attempt and the probability of fistula use were determined using binary logistic regression. Catheter and fistula procedure rates were described using Poisson regression. We studied time to fistula attempt and time to fistula use, accounting for competing risks.

Results

We included 1446 (61%) men and 929 (39%) women. Men had a lower body mass index (P < 0.001) and were more likely to have coronary artery disease (P < 0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (p < 0.001). A total of 688 (48%) men and 403 (43%) women received a fistula attempt. Women were less likely to receive a fistula attempt by 6 months {odds ratio [OR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.79]} and to achieve catheter-free use of their fistula by 1 year [OR 0.38 (95% CI 0.27-0.53)]. At an average of 2.30 access procedures per person-year, there is no difference between women and men [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.97 (95% CI 0.87-1.07)]. Restricting to those with a fistula attempt, women received more procedures [IRR 1.16 (95% CI 1.04-1.30)] attributed to increased catheter procedures [IRR 1.50 (95% CI 1.27-1.78)]. There was no difference in fistula procedures [IRR women versus men 0.96 (95% CI 0.85-1.07)].

Conclusion

Compared with men, fewer women undergo a fistula attempt. This disparity increases after adjusting for comorbidities. Women have the same number of fistula procedures as men but are less likely to successfully use their fistula.

The Effect of Geometric Graft Modification on Arteriovenous Graft Patency in Haemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are the second best option for haemodialysis access when native arteriovenous fistulae placement is not possible, because they have a lower patency owing to neointimal hyperplasia at the venous anastomosis. This review aimed to evaluate the effect of geometric graft modification to the graft-vein interface on AVG patency.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE and Embase (OvidSP) databases were systematically searched for relevant studies analysing the effect of geometrically modified AVGs on graft patency and stenosis formation (last search July 2019).

REVIEW METHODS

Data regarding AVG type, patency, and graft outlet stenosis was extracted for further evaluation. Data were pooled in a random effects model to estimate the relative risk of graft occlusion within one year. Follow up, number of patients, and relevant patient characteristics were extracted for the quality assessment of the included studies using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of the evidence was determined according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

Search strategies produced 2772 hits, of which eight articles met predetermined inclusion criteria. Overall, the included articles had low to moderate risk of bias. In total, 414 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene AVGs (232 geometrically modified and 182 standard) were analysed, comprising two modified AVG types: a prosthetic cuff design (Venaflo®) and grafts with a Tyrell vein patch. Overall, modified grafts did not show a statistically significantly higher one year primary (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 95% 0.64-1.16; GRADE: "low to very low") or secondary patency (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32-1.02; GRADE: "low to very low") when compared with standard AVGs. Analysis of prosthetic cuffed grafts (112 patients) separately demonstrated a statistically significantly higher one year primary (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.91) and one year secondary patency (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.75) compared with standard grafts (92 patients). The results on stenosis formation were inconclusive and inadmissible to quantitative analyses.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis showed that a prosthetic cuff design significantly improves AVG patency, while a venous cuff does not. Although the heterogeneity and low number of available studies limit the strength of the results, this review shows the potential of grafts with geometric modification to the graft-vein anastomosis and should stimulate further clinical and fundamental research on improving graft geometry to improve graft patency.

Novel Approaches to Arteriovenous Access Creation, Maturation, Suitability, and Durability for Dialysis

Since the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) was first conceived over 50 years ago, the goal to create a vascular conduit with predictable and reproducible maturation and durability continues to elude caregivers. Recently, however, advances in the understanding of vascular biology and new technologies now provides us with some optimism; we are moving toward a viable solution. A quickly maturing, sustainable, and durable arteriovenous access may soon be attainable. This review will discuss these advances. There are novel approaches to AVF creation and devices to enhance maturation, advances in arteriovenous graft material(s), and devices to safely prolong the use of tunneled dialysis catheters. Although hemodialysis (HD) access remains a complex problem, these innovations may lead the way to optimizing the care and the quality of life of those patients who have no choice but to proceed with HD.

Early Predictors of Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation: A Novel Perspective on an Enduring Problem

BACKGROUND

Preoperative ultrasound mapping is routinely used to select vessels meeting minimal threshold diameters for surgical arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation but fails to improve AVF maturation rates. This suggests a need to reassess the preoperative ultrasound criteria used to optimize AVF maturation.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 300 catheter-dependent patients on hemodialysis with a new AVF created between 2010 and 2016. We then evaluated the associations of preoperative vascular measurements and hemodynamic factors with unassisted AVF maturation (successful use for dialysis without prior intervention) and overall maturation (successful use with or without prior intervention). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify preoperative factors associated with unassisted and overall AVF maturation.

RESULTS

Unassisted AVF maturation associated with preoperative arterial diameter (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.50 per 1-mm increase; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.83), preoperative systolic BP (aOR, 1.16 per 10-mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.28), and left ventricular ejection fraction (aOR, 1.07 per 5% increase; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.13). Overall AVF maturation associated with preoperative arterial diameter (aOR, 1.36 per 1-mm increase; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.66) and preoperative systolic BP (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.30). Using receiver operating curves, the combination of preoperative arterial diameter, systolic BP, and left ventricular ejection fraction was fairly predictive of unassisted maturation (area under the curve, 0.69). Patient age, sex, race, diabetes, vascular disease, obesity, and AVF location were not associated with maturation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative arterial diameter may be an under-recognized predictor of AVF maturation. Further study evaluating the effect of preoperative arterial diameter and other hemodynamic factors on AVF maturation is needed.

A Novel Model of Balloon Angioplasty Injury in Rat Arteriovenous Fistula

BACKGROUND

There are very few animal models of balloon angioplasty injury in arteriovenous fistula (AVF), hindering insight into the pathophysiologic processes following angioplasty in AVF. The objective of the study was to develop and characterize a rat model of AVF angioplasty injury.

METHODS

Balloon angioplasty in 12- to 16-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats was performed at the arteriovenous anastomosis 14 days post-AVF creation with a 2F Fogarty balloon catheter. Morphometry and protein expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), monocyte-chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), CD68 (macrophage marker), and collagen expression in AVFs with and without angioplasty were assessed.

RESULTS

In AVFs with angioplasty versus without angioplasty: (1) angioplasty increased AVF-vein and artery intimal hyperplasia, (2) angioplasty decreased eNOS protein expression in AVF-vein and artery at 21 days post-AVF creation and remained decreased in the AVF-vein angioplasty group at 35 days, (3) angioplasty increased AVF-vein and artery α-SMA expression within the intimal region at 35 days, (4) angioplasty increased the expression of AVF-vein MCP-1 at 21 days and CD68 at 21 and 35 days, and (5) angioplasty increased AVF-vein and artery collagen expression at 35 days.

CONCLUSION

Our findings describe a reproducible rat model to better understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms that ensue following AVF angioplasty.

Two-year cumulative patency of endovascular arteriovenous fistula

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The recent advent of a device to create a proximal radial artery arteriovenous fistula using an endovascular approach to create the anastomosis represents a significant advance in dialysis access creation. This endovascular arteriovenous fistula offers the beneficial attributes of the proximal radial artery arteriovenous fistula while adding the advantages of avoiding a surgical procedure. The endovascular arteriovenous fistula can be created safely, functions well, has excellent patency, and has a high degree of patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to report the 2-year cumulative patency rate for a large multicenter cohort of endovascular arteriovenous fistula cases.

DESIGN

An endovascular arteriovenous fistula was created in 105 patients using either local or regional anesthesia and conscious sedation. Patient data were obtained from each program's electronic health record system. Data collection was truncated at 2 years postprocedure and used to calculate cumulative patency. Post-access creation patient satisfaction was assessed.

RESULTS

A physiologically mature arteriovenous fistula (blood flow ⩾500 mL/min and a target vein internal diameter ⩾4 mm) was obtained in 98%. A clinically functional arteriovenous fistula (supporting two-needle dialysis according to the patient's dialysis prescription) was demonstrated in 95%. Access failure resulting in the loss of access occurred in eight cases during the study period. The cumulative patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 97.1%, 93.9%, 93.9%, and 92.7%, respectively. The post-procedure patient evaluation emphasized a high level of patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The proximal radial artery arteriovenous fistula created using an endovascular approach for the anastomosis is associated with excellent 2-year cumulative patency and is associated with a high level of patient satisfaction.

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update

The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access since 1996. Since the last update in 2006, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2019 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access is a comprehensive document intended to assist multidisciplinary practitioners care for chronic kidney disease patients and their vascular access. New topics include the end-stage kidney disease "Life-Plan" and related concepts, guidance on vascular access choice, new targets for arteriovenous access (fistulas and grafts) and central venous catheters, management of specific complications, and renewed approaches to some older topics. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence was independently conducted by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and interpretation and application followed the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.

Development and validation of a clinical score to predict 1-year survival of arteriovenous fistula access: a diagnostic study

Purpose

To develop and validate a clinical scoring model to predict 1-year access survival among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who received a new arteriovenous fistula (AVF).

Methods

The data of 195 ESRD patients in the development cohort who underwent first-time AVF creation between January 2009 and June 2013 and who had successful cannulation for dialysis use were reviewed. The clinical features that were significantly associated with 1-year AVF survival were incorporated into a clinical scoring model. The validity of this clinical score was then tested in a validation cohort of 204 ESRD patients who received a new AVF between July 2013 and December 2017.

Results

Of the 195 patients in the development cohort, 168 patients (86.2%) had a well-functioning AVF at 1 year. Absence of diabetes mellitus, no previous history of central venous catheter insertion, and absence of intervention performed to achieve access maturation were positively associated with 1-year AVF survival. These 3 factors were incorporated into a clinical scoring model, which ranged from 0 to 4 points. For a cutoff score of ≥3, the sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict 1-year AVF survival were 81.5%, 70.4%, and 0.760, respectively. The predictive performance of the clinical score was confirmed in the validation cohort, with a sensitivity of 76.1%, a specificity of 64.4% and an area under the curve of 0.703.

Conclusion

The scoring model using clinical data yielded acceptable performance in predicting 1-year access survival among patients receiving a new AVF.

Long-Term Outcomes of Arteriovenous Fistulas with Unassisted versus Assisted Maturation: A Retrospective National Hemodialysis Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

About half of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) require one or more interventions before successful dialysis use, a process called assisted maturation. Previous research suggested that AVF abandonment and interventions to maintain patency after maturation may be more frequent with assisted maturation versus unassisted maturation.

METHODS

Using the US Renal Data System, we retrospectively compared patients with assisted versus unassisted AVF maturation for postmaturation AVF outcomes, including functional primary patency loss (requiring intervention after achieving AVF maturation), AVF abandonment, and frequency of interventions.

RESULTS

We included 7301 patients ≥67 years who initiated hemodialysis from July 2010 to June 2012 with a catheter and no prior AVF; all had an AVF created within 6 months of starting hemodialysis and used for dialysis (matured) within 6 months of creation, with 2-year postmaturation follow-up. AVFs matured without prior intervention for 56% of the patients. Assisted AVF maturation with one, two, three, or four or more prematuration interventions occurred in 23%, 12%, 5%, and 4% of patients, respectively. Patients with prematuration interventions had significantly increased risk of functional primary patency loss compared with patients who had unassisted AVF maturation, and the risk increased with the number of interventions. Although the likelihood of AVF abandonment was not higher among patients with up to three prematuration interventions compared with patients with unassisted AVF maturation, it was significantly higher among those with four or more interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

For this cohort of patients undergoing assisted AVF maturation, we observed a positive association between the number of prematuration AVF interventions and the likelihood of functional primary patency loss and frequency of postmaturation interventions.

Outcomes of endovascular salvage of clotted arteriovenous access and predictors of patency after thrombectomy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report the outcomes of endovascular salvage of clotted arteriovenous (AV) accesses and to determine potential predictors of poor patency rates after thrombectomy.

METHODS

Records of hemodialysis patients who underwent endovascular salvage of clotted AV access were reviewed retrospectively. Technical and clinical success rates, complication rates, and 3- and 6-month patency rates were determined. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the predictors of patency after thrombectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients underwent endovascular salvage of clotted AV access during the study period; 156 patients had arteriovenous fistula, whereas the remaining 138 were arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). The technical and clinical success rates were 96.3% and 93.2%; the major and minor complication rates were 0.7% and 9.9%. Post-thrombectomy primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 62.9%, 76.2%, and 77.6% at 3 months and 43.9%, 59.5%, and 61.6% at 6 months. The patency rates were significantly better for arteriovenous fistula than for AVG except for 6-month assisted primary and secondary patency. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that prior thrombosis within 90 days was significantly associated with loss of primary patency (hazard ratio [HR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.98; P < .01), assisted primary patency (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.42-4.13; P < .01), and secondary patency (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.40-4.53; P < .01). Having an AVG was also negatively associated with primary patency.

CONCLUSIONS

Most clotted AV accesses can be salvaged by endovascular technique. Recurrent thrombosis within 90 days is associated with poor short- and long-term patency even after successful endovascular reinterventions.

Factors affecting arteriovenous fistula dysfunction: A narrative review

Vascular access dysfunction is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in haemodialysis patients, contributing to up to one third of hospitalisations and accounting for a significant amount of the health care costs of these patients. In the past decades, significant scientific advances in understanding mechanisms of arteriovenous fistula maturation and failure have contributed to an increase in the amount of research into techniques for creation and strategies for arteriovenous fistula dysfunction prevention and treatment, in order to improve patient care and outcomes. The aim of this review is to describe the pathogenesis of vascular access failure and provide a comprehensive analysis of the associated risk factors and causes of vascular access failure, in order to interpret possible future therapeutic approaches. Arteriovenous fistula failure is a multifactorial process resulting from the combination of upstream and downstream events with consequent venous neo-intimal hyperplasia and/or inadequate outward remodelling. Inflammation appears to be central in the biology of arteriovenous fistula dysfunction but important triggers still need to be revealed. Given the significant association of arteriovenous fistula failure and patient's prognosis, it is therefore imperative to further research in this area in order to improve prevention, surveillance and treatment, and ultimately patient care and outcomes.

Vascular Access for Hemodialysis Patients: New Data Should Guide Decision Making

This commentary critically examines key assumptions and recommendations in the 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative vascular access guidelines, and argues that several are not relevant to the contemporary United States hemodialysis population. First, the guidelines prefer arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs), on the basis of their superior secondary survival and lower frequency of interventions and infections. However, intent-to-treat analyses that incorporate the higher primary failure of AVFs, demonstrate equivalent secondary survival of both access types. Moreover, the lower rate of AVF versus AVG infections is counterbalanced by the higher rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections before AVF maturation. In addition, AVFs with assisted maturation (interventions before successful AVF use), which account for about 50% of new AVFs, are associated with inferior secondary patency compared with AVGs without intervention before successful use. Second, the guidelines posit lower access management costs for AVFs than AVGs. However, in patients who undergo AVF or AVG placement after starting dialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC), the overall cost of access management is actually higher in patients receiving an AVF. Third, the guidelines prefer forearm over upper arm AVFs. However, published data demonstrate superior maturation of upper arm versus forearm AVFs, likely explaining the progressive increase in upper arm AVFs in the United States. Fourth, AVFs are thought to fail primarily because of aggressive juxta-anastomotic stenosis. However, recent evidence suggests that many AVFs mature despite neointimal hyperplasia, and that suboptimal arterial vasodilation may be an equally important contributor to AVF nonmaturation. Finally, CVC use is believed to result in excess mortality in patients on hemodialysis. However, recent data suggest that CVC use is simply a surrogate marker of sicker patients who are more likely to die, rather than being a mediator of mortality.

The forearm arteriovenous graft between the brachial artery and the brachial vein as a reliable dialysis vascular access for patients with inadequate superficial veins

OBJECTIVE

The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is recommended as the preferred hemodialysis access. However, placing an AVF in all patients may result in poor access outcomes and increased central venous catheter (CVC) use because of increased comorbid conditions, age, and suboptimal vessels. In patients with inadequate superficial veins for AVFs, the use of the brachial veins for creation of forearm arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) has received limited attention. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate outcomes of forearm brachial-brachial AVGs (BB-AVGs) placed in patients with poor superficial veins.

METHODS

We identified 111 BB-AVGs created in 111 consecutive patients, using standard-walled polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, between January 2010 and December 2015. After excluding 6 patients (non-dialysis initiation, missing information, and death within 1 month), we included 105 patients from 21 dialysis centers. We analyzed primary failures, time to cannulation, patency, complications, and revisions. Patency rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The incidence of complications and revisions was expressed as number of events per person-year.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (median age, 69 years) were followed up for a median time of 21.2 months (interquartile range, 9.2-36.5 months). Of the patients, 72.4% were on chronic hemodialysis and had previously undergone one or more access procedures. At the time of BB-AVG placement, prior accesses were 39 AVFs, 20 tunneled CVCs, and 17 AVGs. BB-AVG rates of primary failure and revision before cannulation were 7.6% and 5.7%, respectively. BB-AVGs were cannulated after a median time of 3.4 weeks (interquartile range, 2.8-4.1 weeks). Primary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 49.5%, 29.5%, and 19.5%. Secondary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 76.3%, 62.7%, and 54.6%. After cannulation, the incidence of complications and revisions was 1.054 and 0.649 per person-year, respectively. Most complications and interventions were due to thrombosis (0.527 per person-year) or stenosis (0.381 per person-year) and related interventions (0.490 per person-year). A minority of patients experienced AVG infections (0.052 per person-year), with only two requiring access removal.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with poor superficial veins, the forearm BB-AVG is a reliable access because of low access-related morbidity and considerable long-term access survival. BB-AVG placement has the advantage of preserving proximal vessels. In these patients, such an approach can delay both rapid exhaustion of vascular sites and early recourse to CVC permanent use.

Gender Disparities in Vascular Access Surgical Outcomes in Elderly Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite national vascular access guidelines promoting the use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) for dialysis, AVF use is substantially lower in females. We assessed clinically relevant AVF and AVG surgical outcomes in elderly male and female patients initiating hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC).

METHODS

Using the United States Renal Data System standard analytic files linked with Medicare claims, we assessed incident hemodialysis patients in the United States, 9,458 elderly patients (≥67 years; 4,927 males and 4,531 females) initiating hemodialysis from July 2010 to June 2011 with a catheter and had an AVF or AVG placed within 6 months. We evaluated vascular access placement, successful use for dialysis, assisted use (requiring an intervention before successful use), abandonment after successful use, and rate of interventions after successful use.

RESULTS

Females were less likely than males to receive an AVF (adjusted likelihood 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.63). Among patients receiving an AVF, females had higher adjusted likelihoods of unsuccessful AVF use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% CI 1.36-1.56), assisted AVF use (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17-1.54), and AVF abandonment (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.50), but similar relative rate of AVF interventions after successful use (relative risk [RR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.08). Among patients receiving an AVG, females had a lower likelihood of unsuccessful AVG use (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94), similar rates of assisted AVG use (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.78-1.40) and AVG abandonment, and greater relative rate of interventions after successful AVG use (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

While AVFs should be considered the preferred vascular access in most circumstances, clinical AVF surgical outcomes are uniformly worse in females. Clinicians should also consider AVGs as a viable alternative in elderly female patients initiating hemodialysis with a CVC to avoid extended CVC dependence.

Factors Associated with Secondary Functional Patency After Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty of the Early Failing or Immature Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for early failing hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and predictors of secondary functional patency (FP).

METHODS

A review of our endovascular registry database showed that 61 patients with early failure after a surgically created AVF underwent endovascular intervention between 2011 and 2016. Median time from AVF creation to first intervention was 5.6 weeks. Median duration of follow-up was 14 months. Items related to the technical success rate and primary and secondary FP, and factors associated with secondary FP were analyzed.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 55 (90%) of 61 patients. The primary and secondary FP rates were 42% and 65% at 12 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that lesion length (HR; 1.15, P = 0.001) and lesions including juxta-AVF (the portion of fistula vein within 2 cm of the arteriovenous anastomosis, HR; 6.23, P = 0.008) were factors associated with reduced secondary FP. ROC curve analysis indicated lesion length with cutoff value ≥ 9 cm as a risk factor for reduced secondary FP. Secondary FP at 12 months for patients with no risk factors, with 1, and with 2 was 86%, 65%, and 0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in secondary FP rates among these groups (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A lesion length and juxta-AVF lesion are the risk factors for reduced secondary FP. The secondary FP rate at 12 months is acceptable in patients without risk factors.

Postoperative Ultrasound, Unassisted Maturation, and Subsequent Primary Patency of Arteriovenous Fistulas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative ultrasound is commonly used to assess arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation for hemodialysis, but its utility for predicting unassisted AVF maturation or primary AVF patency for hemodialysis has not been well defined. This study assessed the predictive value of postoperative AVF ultrasound measurements for these clinical AVF outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We queried a prospective vascular access database to identify 246 patients on catheter-dependent hemodialysis who underwent AVF creation between 2010 and 2016 and obtained a postoperative ultrasound within 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of clinical characteristics and postoperative ultrasound measurements with unassisted AVF maturation. A receiver operating characteristic curve estimated the predictive value of these factors for unassisted AVF maturation. Finally, multivariable survival analysis was used to identify factors associated with primary AVF patency in patients with unassisted AVF maturation.

RESULTS

Unassisted AVF maturation occurred in 121 out of 246 patients (49%), assisted maturation in 55 patients (22%), and failure to mature in 70 patients (28%). Using multivariable logistic regression, unassisted AVF maturation was associated with AVF blood flow (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18 to 1.45 per 100 ml/min increase; P<0.001), forearm location (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.78; P=0.21), presence of stenosis (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.88; P=0.02); AVF depth (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.00 per 1 mm increase; P=0.05), and AVF location interaction with depth (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.84; P=0.02). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, using all these factors, was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.89; P<0.001). Primary AVF patency in patients with unassisted maturation was associated only with AVF diameter (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.94 per 1 mm increase; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Unassisted AVF maturation is predicted by AVF blood flow, location, depth, and stenosis. AVF patency after unassisted maturation is predicted only by the postoperative AVF diameter.