Complication rates associated with antegrade use of vascular closure devices: a systematic review and pooled analysis

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel external compression vascular closure device: The LockeT® study

INTRODUCTION

Hemostasis following large-bore femoral vein access remains a challenge. Manual compression has been the standard of care but requires bedside staff, prolonged bed rest, and longer length of stay. The LockeT is an external compression device that attempts to address these issues while achieving venous hemostasis.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate postprocedural hemostasis and vascular closure outcomes after using LockeT following cardiac electrophysiologic procedures.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, observational study of patients who underwent vascular closure for electrophysiology procedures using LockeT. Postprocedural outcomes were subsequently analyzed.

RESULTS

We studied 102 patients (N) for whom LockeT was used to close 182 separate vascular access sites (n). Common procedures were atrial fibrillation ablation (56.9%, N = 58) and left atrial appendage occlusion (28.4%, N = 29). Most often, 8-Fr [48.3% (n = 126)], 11-Fr [27.2% (n = 71)], and 8.5-Fr [16.9% (n = 44)] sheaths were used, with an average procedure time of 82.1 ± 29.4 min. Hemostasis was achieved in 97.8% (n = 187) of all LockeT cases. Time to ambulation and discharge were 3.93 ± 1.10 h and 8.1 ± 4.4 h, respectively. No major complications were noted. Postprocedurally, 52% (N = 53) of patients were discharged on the same day. There were no differences in hemostasis (p = .859) or ambulation times (p = .202) between procedure types.

CONCLUSION

The LockeT can effectively close venous access sites with no major complications.

Randomized study for a novel elbow joint fixation device on postoperative complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary diagnostic or therapeutic procedures through the brachial artery

Brachial artery access for coronary diagnostic or therapeutic procedures is associated with a greater risk of vascular complications. To determine whether 3D printing of a novel elbow joint fixation device could reduce postoperative complications after percutaneous coronary diagnostic or therapeutic procedures through the brachial artery. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary diagnostic or therapeutic procedures by brachial access were randomly assigned to receive either a 3D-printed elbow joint fixation device (brace group) or traditional compression (control group) from March 2023 to December 2023. The severity of puncture site-related discomfort at 24 h postsurgery was significantly lower in the brace group (P = 0.014). Similarly, the upper arm calibration rate at 24 h postsurgery was significantly lower in the brace group [0.024 (0.019-0.046) vs. 0.077 (0.038-0.103), P < 0.001], as was the forearm calibration rate [0.026 (0.024-0.049) vs. 0.050 (0.023-0.091), P = 0.007]. The brace group had a significantly lower area of subcutaneous hemorrhage at 24 h postsurgery [0.255 (0-1.00) vs. 1 (0.25-1.75) cm2]. In patients who underwent percutaneous coronary diagnostic or therapeutic procedures by brachial access after manual compression hemostasis, the novel elbow joint fixation device was effective at reducing puncture site-related discomfort, alleviating the degree of swelling, and minimizing the subcutaneous bleeding area. Additionally, no significant complications were observed.Trial registration: China Clinical Trial Registration on 01/03/2023 (ChiCTR2300068791).

Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation

Occlusive lesions of the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation have traditionally been treated with open surgery. Although long-term patency rates after open surgery are excellent, such repairs are associated with substantial local and general morbidity. In recent years, different treatment options have emerged within percutaneous endovascular repair. We hereby present a narrative review on endovascular treatment modalities and a treatment algorithm for endovascular revascularisation of the CFA and its bifurcation. Lesion analysis, access issues, vessel preparation tools, and types of repairs with or without the involvement of the bifurcation are described. Based on current data, an interventional approach can result in high technical success and acceptable mid-term patency rates. Further comparative evidence with open surgery and/or between the different types of endovascular repairs is required to improve the current treatment algorithm.

The Utility of Ultrasound Guidance to Improve the Safety of Closure of Antegrade Common Femoral Artery Access after Lower Limb Revascularization

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guidance in reducing adverse event (AE) rates when using Angioseal device during antegrade lower limb angioplasty via common femoral artery access. From December 2016 to November 2022, 1,322 patients were identified, including 1,131 (85.6%) patients who underwent US-guided closure and 191 (14.4%) who underwent non-US-guided closure. Moderate AEs were encountered in 10 (5.2%) patients in the non-US-guided closure group compared to 38 (3.4%) patients in the US-guided closure group (P = .208). Severe AEs were encountered in 4 (2.1%) patients in the non-US-guided closure group compared to 3 (0.3%) patients in the US-guided closure group (P = .010). Overall AEs occurred in 14 (7.3%) patients in the non-US-guided closure group compared to 41 (3.6%) patients in the US-guided closure group (P = .029). Binary logistic regression showed that only non-US guidance was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of severe AEs (P = .008).

Percutaneous, Antegrade Access of the Superficial Femoral Artery can be Safely Used in Procedures for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that antegrade access for treatment of infrainguinal peripheral vascular disease is associated with decreased radiation exposure and contrast use without a significant increase in access complication, although data are limited on antegrade superficial femoral artery (SFA) access for larger sheath sizes. We aim to describe a single institution's contemporary experience with percutaneous antegrade SFA access.

METHODS

A retrospective review of percutaneous, infrainguinal endovascular interventions for arterial occlusive disease at a major academic institution was conducted between 2018 and 2020. Antegrade, percutaneous, SFA access cases were included. Information on demographics, indication, sheath size, arteries treated, type of intervention, concurrent pedal access, closure devices, and complications was collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with an average body mass index of 25.25 were identified. Indications for intervention included tissue loss (64.4%), rest pain (6.7%), claudication (13.3%), and acute limb ischemia (11.1%). Of which, 80.0% of patients had multilevel interventions. Angioplasty was performed in 68.8% of patients, stenting in 8.3%, atherectomy in 15.6%, and thrombectomy in 7.3%. Nearly a quarter of cases involved concurrent pedal access. Maximum sheath size was 4F for 4.4% of patients, 5F for 28.9%, 6F for 46.7%, 7F for 11.1%, and 8F for 8.9%. The closure device was utilized in 75.6% of cases, with no closure device failures. In the entire cohort, there were no demonstrated access site complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates percutaneous, antegrade SFA access for complex endovascular interventions for infrainguinal occlusive disease can be effectively utilized, even with larger sheath size. Moreover, routine use of closure devices is safe, improving patient comfort and expediting time to ambulation.

Real-world VASCADE closure device versus manual compression use and outcomes in patients with severe common femoral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The VASCADE closure device deploys an extravascular collagen plug. Its use in those with access site disease undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the VASCADE closure device compared to manual compression (MC) in patients with moderate femoral access site disease.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective review of patients undergoing PVI with at least moderate access site disease. Our institutional database was linked to the Vascular Quality Initiative database, and 200 patients were selected from a 1:1 propensity-matched cohort. Data on procedural metrics and outcomes up to 30-days were abstracted.

RESULTS

There were 103 procedures that used VASCADE and 97 used MC. Baseline variables were similar between groups. The mean age was 68.2 ± 11.2 years and 37.6% were women. Closing mean activated clotting time (ACT) was shorter in VASCADE (198 s VASCADE vs. 213 s MC; p = 0.018). There was a nonsignificant decrease in external compression device use with VASCADE (VASCADE 19.0% vs. MC 28.1%; p = 0.15). At 30-days, there was a nonsignificant reduction in hematoma with VASCADE (3.8% vs. 7.8% MC; p = 0.25) and no difference in retroperitoneal bleeding (0.5%). Pseudoaneurysm rate was similar (1.3% VASCADE vs. 1.7% MC; p = 0.79). The 30-day mortality rate was similar between the two groups and not related to the procedure (1.3% VASCADE vs. 0.9% MC; p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing PVI with at least moderate access site disease, safety and efficacy after using VASCADE was comparable with MC.

Access Site Complications Are Uncommon with Vascular Closure Devices or Manual Compression after Lower Extremity Revascularization

OBJECTIVE

Vascular closure devices (VCD) and manual compression (MC) are used to achieve hemostasis following peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). We sought to compare perioperative outcomes between MC and four VCDs following PVI in a multicenter setting.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for all lower extremity (LE) PVIs with common femoral artery access performed from 2010-2020. VCDs included were MynxGrip® (Cordis, Santa Clara, CA, USA), StarClose SE™ (Abbott, Redwood City, CA, USA), Angio-Seal® (Terumo, Somerset, NJ, USA), and Perclose ProGlide™ (Abbott, Redwood City, CA, USA). In a blinded fashion, these four VCDs (A, B, C, D) were compared to MC for baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes (access site hematoma and stenosis/occlusion). Sheath size >8 Fr were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were completed for unmatched and matched data.

RESULTS

There were 84,172 LE PVIs identified: 32,013 (38%) used MC and 52,159 (62%) used VCDs (A-12,675;B-6,224;C-19,872;D-13,388). Overall, average age was 68.7 years and 60.4% were male; indications for intervention were most commonly claudication (43.8%) and tissue loss (40.1%). When compared to MC, VCDs were utilized more often in patients with obesity, diabetes, and end stage renal disease (all P<.001). VCDs were used less often in patients with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, prior percutaneous coronary and extremity interventions, and major amputation (all P<.001). VCD use was more common, compared to MC, during femoral-popliteal (73% vs. 63.8%) and tibial interventions (33.8% vs. 22.3%), but less common with iliac interventions (20.6% vs. 34.7%) (all P<.001). Protamine was used less often after VCDs (19.1% vs. 25.6%, P<.001). Overall, there were 2,003 (2.4%) hematomas of which 278 (13.9%) required thrombin/surgical intervention. When compared to MC, any VCD use had fewer hematomas (1.7% vs. 3.6%, P<.001) and hematomas requiring intervention (.2% vs. .5%, P<.001). When divided by hemostatic technique, any hematoma were MC-3.6%; A-1.4%; B-1.2%; C-2.3%; D-1.1%, P<.001. Hematomas requiring intervention were MC-.5%; A-.2%; B-.2%; C-.3%; D-.1%, P<.001. Access site stenosis/occlusion was similar between MC and any VCDs (.2% vs. .2%, P=.12). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that any VCDs and individual VCDs, vs. MC, were independently associated with fewer hematomas. Access site stenosis/occlusion was similar between any VCDs and MC. Matched analysis revealed similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall rates of hematomas requiring intervention were low regardless of hemostatic technique, VCD use, irrespective of type, compared favorably to MC with significantly fewer access site complications after PVI.

Flip-over of blood vessel intima caused by vascular closure device: A case report

BACKGROUND

Complications of vascular closure devices mainly include bleeding, vascular injury, and trapped device that cannot be removed percutaneously. However, arterial stenosis or occlusion induced by vascular injury is rare. This article introduces a rare case with severe acute limb ischemia after using the vascular closure device (StarClose).

CASE SUMMARY

A 54-year-old man was admitted because of necrosis of the second toe of the left foot for 2 mo. Ultrasound showed left femoral artery stenosis, and occlusion of the left popliteal, posterior tibial, peroneal, anterior tibial and dorsalis pedis arteries, suggesting arteriosclerosis obliterans of low extremities, gangrene and type 2 diabetes. He underwent an interventional procedure of drug-eluting balloon in the left lower limb via antegrade puncture of the left common femoral artery. He developed acute limb ischemia after 1 h, and severe pain, numbness, pale skin, low skin temperature and weakened sensation in the left foot. Injury of the common femoral artery intima was considered. Exploratory surgery showed occlusion at the puncture point accompanied with bulged vascular lumen and flipped vascular intima caused by StarClose. The flipped intima was removed. The limb blood supply was restored and the limb was saved post-surgery. He recovered well at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Incorrect use of the vascular closure device was the main cause of severe acute limb ischemia in this case.

Vascular Closure: the ABC's

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Vascular access and closure is a key part of endovascular procedures, and access site-related complications are an independent predictor of adverse procedural outcomes. The purpose of this review is to discuss the methods of vascular closure including manual compression, vascular closure devices (VCDs) for both arterial and venous arteriotomies, their mechanisms, and access site-related complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various VCDs have been approved over the last three decades. These devices have different mechanisms to achieve hemostasis and are generally categorized into active and passive approximators. Studies have largely found that they are non-inferior to manual compression. Uncomplicated vascular closure is pertinent to avoid adverse procedure-related outcomes. The emergence of VCDs has reduced time to hemostasis, facilitating early ambulation and discharge and reducing hospitalization cost with comparable complication rate to manual compression. Nonetheless, they should be used in favorable vascular anatomy and are not intended to reduce complications.

Maldeployment of Celt ACD vascular closure device

Vascular closure devices have become more popular in some clinical settings because they allow for quicker hemostasis and earlier ambulation. Although these devices have several benefits compared with manual compression, errors in deployment can result in a multitude of complications. We have presented two cases in which the Celt arterial closure device was maldeployed and caused significant patient morbidity.

Comparison of MynxGrip vascular closure device and manual compression for closure after femoral access angiography: a randomized controlled trial: the closure devices used in every day practice study, CLOSE-UP III trial

Background

Complications related to femoral artery access for coronary angiography (CAG) is a safety concern. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) have been developed to reduce the rate of complications after femoral artery access. We compared the safety and efficacy of the MynxGrip VCD versus manual compression (MC) after femoral access CAG in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods

The study was a randomized, single center, non-blinded, two-arm non-inferiority trial. The study was stopped prematurely because of low inclusion rate.

Results

We randomized 869 patients to closure with the MynxGrip VCD or MC and 865 entered analyses. The incidence of the primary endpoint of major adverse vascular events (MAVE) after 30 days was 1.2% in the MynxGrip group and 0% in the MC group (p = 0.06). The median time to hemostasis was 4 [3:5] minutes and 10 [7:11] minutes in the MynxGrip group and MC group, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding median times to mobilization was 73 [65:87] minutes and 76 [70:88] minutes (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

MAVE was rare after closure of femoral arterial access by both the MynxGrip VCD and MC. We found a numerical difference in favour of MC but this did not reach statistical significance. Time to hemostasis was shorter in the MynxGrip group when compared to the MC group.

Trial registration

The study was approved by the local medical ethics committee and registered at clinicaltrials.org (ClinicalTrials identifier: NCT02237430 11/09/2014).

TRIACCESS Study: Randomized Comparison Between Radial, Femoral, and Pedal Access for Percutaneous Femoro-popliteal Artery Angioplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this randomized study was to compare the success and complication rates of different access sites for the treatment of superficial artery stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 180 consecutive patients were randomized in a prospective study to treat symptomatic superficial femoral artery stenosis via radial (RA), femoral (FA), or pedal artery (PA) access. Technical success was achieved in 96.7%, 100%, and 100% of the patients in the RA, FA, and PA groups, respectively (p=0.33). Secondary access sites were used in 30%, 3.3%, and 30% of the patients in the RA, FA, and PA access groups, respectively (p=0.0002). Recanalization for chronic total occlusion was performed in 34/36 (94.4%), 30/30 (100%), and 46/46 (100%) patients in the RA, FA, and PA groups, respectively (p=0.17). The X-ray dose was significantly lower in the PA group than that in the RA and FA access groups (63.1 vs 162 vs 153 Dyn, p=0.0004). The cumulative rates of access site complications in the RA, FA, and PA groups were 3.3% (0% major and 3.3% minor), 16.7% (3.3% major and 13.3% minor), and 3.3% (3.3% major and 0% minor) (p=0.0085), respectively. The cumulative incidence of MACEs at 6 months in the RA, FA, and PA groups was 5%, 6.7%, and 1.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of MALEs at 6 months in the RA, FA, and PA groups was 20%, 16.7%, and 9.2%, respectively (p=0.54).

CONCLUSION

Femoral artery intervention can be safely and effectively performed using radial, femoral, and pedal access, but radial and pedal access is associated with a lower access site complication rate and hospitalization. Pedal access is associated with a lower X-ray dose than that with radial and femoral access.

Utilisation of Image Guidance to Enhance Safety of Deployment of the Mynx Control Vascular Closure Device

The Mynx Control device (Cardinal Healthcare, Dublin, Ohio, USA) was recently licensed and allows for entirely extravascular arteriotomy closure. It uses a polyethylene glycol sealant plug which is absorbed fully within 30 days, alleviating concerns around difficulties with regaining access in future. The Mynx device uses a balloon, inflated within the artery and retracted against the arteriotomy to achieve haemostasis, with the extravascular sealant plug then deployed outside the vessel wall. While the manufacturer's instructions for use do not include utilisation of imaging guidance, we routinely employ fluoroscopic and/or ultrasound to ensure safe use of the device. These techniques allow confirmation of balloon position against the arteriotomy, hence avoiding inadvertent deployment of the plug partially or fully intraluminally. Visualisation of the balloon within the lumen also eliminates risk of plaque disruption in diseased vessels on retraction of the device. Image guidance adds little time to device deployment, and the safety benefits are such that we recommend that practitioners elsewhere consider adopting our techniques. Here, we describe the process involved in both techniques.

A novel double clip-based vascular closure device in antegrade and retrograde femoral punctures: A single-center experience in peripheral non-cardiac procedures

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study investigates the efficacy and safety of the novel Celt ACD^® vascular closure device (VCD) following antegrade and retrograde common femoral artery (CFA) punctures for the treatment of peripheral artery disease in a challenging patient collective (e.g. calcifications, obesity, and anticoagulation).

METHODS

A total of 208 VCDs (i.e. 100 antegrade and 108 retrograde) were deployed between October 2019 and December 2020 in a tertiary referral interventional radiology department. Fifty-two devices were undersized in relation to the introducer sheath (up to 2 Fr). Technical success and VCD related complications were evaluated in the immediate post procedure period and the following 24 h clinically. In 68% of cases, additional duplex ultrasound was performed prior to discharge.

RESULTS

The overall technical success rate was 97%. Technical failures following antegrade approach were due to a too acute access angle (⩾60°), rendering it impossible to pass the applicator tip through the sheath lumen. A subgroup analysis of technical success pinpoints severe calcification as another key limiting factor in VCD use (p = 0.004). Comparing equally sized with undersized device selection (p = 0.196), direction of approach (p = 0.265), and body mass index (p = 0.184) proved to be insignificant. Five (2%, 5/208) major complications occurred: Four antegrade (i.e. one false aneurysm, one vessel laceration with retroperitoneal hemorrhage, two device migrations; 4%, 4/100) and one following retrograde access (i.e. >6 cm hematoma, 1%, 1/108)). Complications were successfully managed with manual compression or interventional procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel clip-based VCD proved to be effective with a low VCD related complication rate.