1
|
Cazzolli R, Sluiter A, Bateman S, Candler H, Cho Y, Cooper T, Craig JC, Dominello A, Duncanson E, Guha C, Hawley CM, Hewawasam E, Hickey L, Hill K, Howard K, Howell M, Huuskes BM, Irish GL, Jesudason S, Johnson DW, Kelly A, Leary D, Manera K, Mazis J, McDonald S, McLennan H, Muthuramalingam S, Pummeroy M, Scholes-Robertson N, Teixeira-Pinto A, Tunnicliffe DJ, van Zwieten A, Viecelli AK, Wong G, Jaure A. Improving Diverse and Equitable Involvement of Patients and Caregivers in Research in CKD: Report of a Better Evidence and Translation-Chronic Kidney Disease (BEAT-CKD) Workshop. Am J Kidney Dis 2024:S0272-6386(24)00784-4. [PMID: 38810688 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Patient and caregiver involvement can enhance the uptake and impact of research, but the involvement of patients and caregivers who are underserved and marginalized is often limited. A better understanding of how to make involvement in research more broadly accessible, supportive, and inclusive for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and caregivers is needed. We conducted a national workshop involving patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers from across Australia to identify strategies to increase the diversity of patients and caregivers involved in CKD research. Six themes were identified. Building trust and a sense of safety was considered pivotal to establishing meaningful relationships to support knowledge exchange. Establishing community and connectedness was expected to generate a sense of belonging to motivate involvement. Balancing stakeholder goals, expectations, and responsibilities involved demonstrating commitment and transparency by researchers. Providing adequate resources and support included strategies to minimize the burden of involvement for patients and caregivers. Making research accessible and relatable was about nurturing patient and caregiver interest by appealing to intrinsic motivators. Adapting to patient and caregiver needs and preferences required tailoring the approach for individuals and the target community. Strategies and actions to support these themes may support more diverse and equitable involvement of patients and caregivers in research in CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Cazzolli
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney.
| | - Amanda Sluiter
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Samantha Bateman
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide; Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | | | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane; Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane; University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Tess Cooper
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide
| | - Amanda Dominello
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Emily Duncanson
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | - Chandana Guha
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Carmel M Hawley
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane; Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane; University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Erandi Hewawasam
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | | | - Kathy Hill
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney
| | | | - Martin Howell
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Brooke M Huuskes
- Department of Microbiology, Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Agriculture. Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne
| | - Georgina L Irish
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide
| | - Shilpanjali Jesudason
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide
| | - David W Johnson
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane; Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane; University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Ayano Kelly
- University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Diana Leary
- University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Karine Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Jasmin Mazis
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | - Stephen McDonald
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide; Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | - Helen McLennan
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Shyamsundar Muthuramalingam
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide; Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide
| | | | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - David J Tunnicliffe
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Anita van Zwieten
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane; Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane; University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Allison Jaure
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nicholls SG, Fox G, Monfaredi Z, Poole E, Garritty C, Maybee A, Presseau J, Shea B, Fergusson DA. The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2022; 8:50. [PMID: 36071496 PMCID: PMC9450365 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A key component of patient-oriented research is the engagement of patients as partners in the design and conduct of health research. While there is now national infrastructure and networks to support the engagement of patients as partners, there remain calls for promising practices and success stories. In particular, there remains a keen interest in evaluating the impact that patient engagement has on health research studies. We aimed to investigate the impact that patient engagement had on health research conducted in Ontario, Canada. METHODS Our sampling frame was studies that were awarded funding by the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 principal investigators, members of research teams, and patient partners. Interviews explored the role of patient partners, the perceived impact of the patient engagement on the study, challenges faced, and advice for other researchers considering patient engagement. Data were analysed using the thematic analysis method with transcripts coded independently by two members of the study team. All coding and subsequent theme generation were discussed until consensus was achieved. RESULTS There was variation in the methods used to engage patients and other stakeholders, the roles that patients and stakeholders occupied, and where they had input. Interviewees discussed two major areas of impact of patient engagement on research: impact on the study about which they were being interviewed, which tended to relate to improved relevancy of the research to the study population, and impact on themselves which led to changes in their own practice or approaches to future research. Identified challenges to patient engagement included: identifying and reaching patient advisors or patient partners, time-related challenges, and maintaining engagement over the course of the research. CONCLUSIONS There remains a need to further build out the concept of relevancy and how it may be operationalised in practice. Further, the longer-term impacts of patient engagement on researchers and research teams remains under-explored and may reveal additional elements for evaluation. Challenges to patient engagement remain, including identifying and maintaining engagement with partners that reflect the diversity of the population of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart G. Nicholls
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Grace Fox
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Zarah Monfaredi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Evelyn Poole
- Faculty of Arts and Science, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Chantelle Garritty
- Global Health and Guidelines Division, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Beverley Shea
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Dean A. Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tong A, Scholes-Robertson N, Hawley C, Viecelli AK, Carter SA, Levin A, Hemmelgarn BR, Harris T, Craig JC. Patient-centred clinical trial design. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022; 18:514-523. [PMID: 35668231 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00585-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient involvement in clinical trial design can facilitate the recruitment and retention of participants as well as potentially increase the uptake of the tested intervention and the impact of the findings on patient outcomes. Despite these benefits, patients still have very limited involvement in designing and conducting trials in nephrology. Many trials do not address research questions and outcomes that are important to patients, including patient-reported outcomes that reflect how patients feel and function. This limitation can undermine the relevance, reliability and value of trial-based evidence for decision-making in clinical practice and health policy. However, efforts to involve patients with kidney disease are increasing across all stages of the trial process from priority setting, to study design (including selection of outcomes and approaches to improve participant recruitment and retention) and dissemination and implementation of the findings. Harnessing the patient voice in designing trials can ensure that efforts and resources are directed towards patient-centred trials that address the needs, concerns and priorities of patients living with kidney disease with the aim of achieving transformative improvements in care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carmel Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Simon A Carter
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Adeera Levin
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Brenda R Hemmelgarn
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry at University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lowe Jones R, Crichton E, Campbell KN, Hall D, Soyibo A. Organ Transplantation in Jamaica. Transplantation 2022; 106:677-679. [PMID: 35333844 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kirk N Campbell
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Dwayne Hall
- Department of Surgery, Cornwall Regional Hospital, Jamaica, WI
| | - Adedamola Soyibo
- Section of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Jamaica, WI
- Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica, WI
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gutman T, Kelly A, Scholes-Robertson N, Craig JC, Jesudason S, Tong A. Patient and Caregiver Experiences and Attitudes about Their Involvement in Research in Chronic Kidney Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:215-227. [PMID: 35131928 PMCID: PMC8823931 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.05960521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although patient and caregiver involvement in research is widely advocated to improve the relevance and uptake of study findings, barriers and uncertainties in achieving this goal remain. This study aimed to describe patient and caregiver experiences and perspectives of their previous involvement in research, to inform strategies to strengthen patient involvement in research. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 adult patients with CKD and caregivers who had previously been involved in research, from Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Denmark. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS We identified six themes: grappling with CKD diagnosis (overwhelmed by the burden of illness, silenced by stigma and shame, absence of advocacy, and awareness), bearing the responsibility for involvement (autonomy in their own care, forced to be proactive to access opportunities, infrastructural support to connect researchers and patients), battling big agendas (struggling in a system of disincentive, changing research culture, becoming equals), seeing the person behind the patient (harnessing broader knowledge, expertise, skills and interests, understanding patient needs, motivations for involvement), sensitivity to complexities of payment (accounting for individual circumstances, denoting value, enabling diverse involvement), and championing the patient voice (links to important stakeholders, drivers of innovation, responsibility to end users). CONCLUSIONS The burden of CKD, limited opportunities, and power asymmetry between patients/caregivers and researchers were challenges to meaningful involvement in research. Building trust, awareness of opportunities, and recognizing the broad expertise and value of patients/caregivers, including and beyond their illness experience, may better support patient and caregiver involvement in research in CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia Gutman
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ayano Kelly
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan C. Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carter SA, Lightstone L, Cattran D, Tong A, Bagga A, Barbour SJ, Barratt J, Boletis J, Caster DJ, Coppo R, Fervenza FC, Floege J, Hladunewich MA, Hogan JJ, Kitching AR, Lafayette RA, Malvar A, Radhakrishnan J, Rovin BH, Scholes-Robertson N, Trimarchi H, Zhang H, Anumudu S, Cho Y, Gutman T, O’Lone E, Viecelli AK, Au E, Azukaitis K, Baumgart A, Bernier-Jean A, Dunn L, Howell M, Ju A, Logeman C, Nataatmadja M, Sautenet B, Sharma A, Craig JC. A Core Outcome Set for Trials in Glomerular Disease: A Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Glomerular Disease (SONG-GD) Stakeholder Workshops. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:53-64. [PMID: 34969698 PMCID: PMC8763157 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.07840621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Outcomes reported in trials in adults with glomerular disease are often selected with minimal patient input, are heterogeneous, and may not be relevant for clinical decision making. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Glomerular Disease (SONG-GD) initiative aimed to establish a core outcome set to help ensure that outcomes of critical importance to patients, care partners, and clinicians are consistently reported. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS We convened two 1.5-hour workshops in Melbourne, Australia, and Washington, DC, United States. Attendees were identified purposively with 50 patients/care partners and 88 health professionals from 19 countries; 51% were female. Patients and care partners were from the United States, Australia, and Canada, and had experience of a glomerular disease with systemic features (n=9), kidney-limited nephrotic disease (n=9), or other kidney-limited glomerular disease (n=8). Attendees reviewed the results of the SONG-GD Delphi survey and aims of the workshop and then discussed potential core outcomes and their implementation in trials among moderated breakout groups of eight to 12 people from diverse backgrounds. Transcripts of discussions were analyzed thematically. RESULTS Three themes were identified that supported the proposed core outcomes: limiting disease progression, stability and control, and ensuring universal relevance (i.e., applicable across diverse populations and settings). The fourth theme, preparedness for implementation, included engaging with funders and regulators, establishing reliable and validated measures, and leveraging existing endorsements for patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Workshop themes demonstrated support for kidney function, disease activity, death, life participation, and cardiovascular disease, and these were established as the core outcomes for trials in adults with glomerular disease. Future work is needed to establish the core measures for each domain, with funders and regulators central to the uptake of the core outcome set in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon A. Carter
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Liz Lightstone
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dan Cattran
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arvind Bagga
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, New Delhi, India
| | - Sean J. Barbour
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jonathan Barratt
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom,John Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - John Boletis
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Medical School, University of Athens, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dawn J. Caster
- Division of Nephrology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Rosanna Coppo
- Molinette Research Foundation, Regina Margherita Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Fernando C. Fervenza
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jürgen Floege
- Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michelle A. Hladunewich
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan J. Hogan
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - A. Richard Kitching
- Departments of Nephrology and Paediatric Nephrology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia,Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard A. Lafayette
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Ana Malvar
- Nephrology, Hospital Fernández, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Brad H. Rovin
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hernán Trimarchi
- Nephrology Service and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hong Zhang
- Renal Division of Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Samaya Anumudu
- Department of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia,Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Talia Gutman
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emma O’Lone
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrea K. Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Eric Au
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karolis Azukaitis
- Clinic of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Amanda Baumgart
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amelie Bernier-Jean
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Louese Dunn
- Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Howell
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Angela Ju
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Charlotte Logeman
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Melissa Nataatmadja
- Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- University Francois Rabelais, Tours, France,Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Tours Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Ankit Sharma
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan C. Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Evans RDR, Smyth B, Levin A, Jha V, Wheeler DC, Jardine M, Perkovic V, Damster S, Malik C, de Zeeuw D, Hiemstra T. The International Society of Nephrology Advancing Clinical Trials (ISN-ACT) Network: current activities and future goals. Kidney Int 2021; 99:551-554. [PMID: 33309956 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rhys D R Evans
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brendan Smyth
- Innovation and Kidney Research, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adeera Levin
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Vivek Jha
- The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India
| | - David C Wheeler
- Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Meg Jardine
- Innovation and Kidney Research, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vlado Perkovic
- Innovation and Kidney Research, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Charu Malik
- The International Society of Nephrology, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dick de Zeeuw
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Hiemstra
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hillier DR, Tang M, Clark W, MacDonald C, Connolly C, Large C, King M, Singer J, Levin A, Manns B, Konvalinka A, Scholey J, Rosenblum ND. A Framework to Ensure Patient Partners Have Equal and Contributing Voices Throughout the Research Program Evaluation Process. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2020; 7:2054358120970093. [PMID: 33294204 PMCID: PMC7705288 DOI: 10.1177/2054358120970093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE OF PROGRAM Traditionally, peer review was a closed process conducted only by individuals working in the research field. To establish a more integrated and patient-centered approach, one of Canada's largest kidney research networks (Can-SOLVE CKD) has created a Research Operations Committee (ROC) that includes patients as key members. The ROC represents one way for achieving meaningful patient-oriented research (POR). SOURCE OF INFORMATION Can-SOLVE CKD, a network created as part of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR). METHODS The ROC consists of patients, physicians, scientists, Indigenous partners, experts in research methodology, and a member of Can-SOLVE CKD's operational team. On an annual basis, Can-SOLVE CKD's research teams provide the ROC with a review package, which incorporates information from patient engagement check-in calls and surveys, the project's knowledge translation plan and products, and a progress report written by the project team. The ROC evaluates the review package and provides feedback and recommendations accordingly. KEY FINDINGS The transparent nature of the process, regular feedback and review, along with an overt accountability and scoring system, has been embraced by both patients and researchers. As a result of the ROC process, the number of patient leads for each project has grown over a 3-year period and more researchers have received POR and cultural sensitivity training. LIMITATIONS While anecdotal evidence suggests this approach is beneficial for achieving POR, formal mechanisms of evaluation are currently lacking. IMPLICATIONS This ROC framework ensures patients are active contributors throughout the research process and could be adopted by other organizations to achieve a more patient-centered approach to research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mila Tang
- The University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, Canada
| | - William Clark
- Department of Medicine, London Health
Sciences Centre, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Joel Singer
- The University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Braden Manns
- University of Calgary, AB, Canada
- Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB,
Canada
| | | | - James Scholey
- University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON,
Canada
| | - Norman D. Rosenblum
- Department of Paediatrics, The
Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nicholls SG, Carroll K, Weijer C, Goldstein CE, Brehaut J, Sood MM, Al-Jaishi A, Basile E, Grimshaw JM, Garg AX, Taljaard M. Ethical Issues in the Design and Conduct of Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials in Hemodialysis Care: An Interview Study With Key Stakeholders. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2020; 7:2054358120964119. [PMID: 33194212 PMCID: PMC7597560 DOI: 10.1177/2054358120964119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pragmatic cluster randomized trials (CRTs) offer an opportunity to improve health care by answering important questions about the comparative effectiveness of treatments using a trial design that can be embedded in routine care. There is a lack of empirical research that addresses ethical issues generated by pragmatic CRTs in hemodialysis. OBJECTIVE To identify stakeholder perceptions of ethical issues in pragmatic CRTs conducted in hemodialysis. DESIGN Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING In-person or telephone interviews with an international group of stakeholders. PARTICIPANTS Stakeholders (clinical investigators, methodologists, ethicists and research ethics committee members, and other knowledge users) who had been involved in the design or conduct of a pragmatic individual patient or cluster randomized trial in hemodialysis, or their role would require them to review and evaluate pragmatic CRTs in hemodialysis. METHODS Interviews were conducted in-person or over the telephone and were audio-recorded with consent. Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim prior to analysis. Transcripts and field notes were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Sixteen interviews were conducted with 19 individuals. Interviewees were largely drawn from North America (84%) and were predominantly clinical investigators (42%). Six themes were identified in which pragmatic CRTs in hemodialysis raise ethical issues: (1) patients treated with hemodialysis as a vulnerable population, (2) appropriate approaches to informed consent, (3) research burdens, (4) roles and responsibilities of gatekeepers, (5) inequities in access to research, and (6) advocacy for patient-centered research and outcomes. LIMITATIONS Participants were largely from North America and did not include research staff, who may have differing perspectives. CONCLUSIONS The six themes reflect concerns relating to individual rights, but also the need to consider population-level issues. To date, concerns regarding inequity of access to research and the need for patient-centered research have received less coverage than other, well-known, issues such as consent. Pragmatic CRTs offer a potential approach to address equity concerns and we suggest future ethical analyses and guidance for pragmatic CRTs in hemodialysis embed equity considerations within them. We further note the potential for the co-creation of health data infrastructure with patients which would aid care but also facilitate patient-centered research. These present results will inform planned future guidance in relation to the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic CRTs in hemodialysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registration is not applicable as this is a qualitative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart G. Nicholls
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Kelly Carroll
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Charles Weijer
- Department of Philosophy, Western University, London, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada
| | | | - Jamie Brehaut
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Manish M. Sood
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Jindal Research Chair for the Prevention of Kidney Disease, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ahmed Al-Jaishi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Erika Basile
- Research Ethics and Compliance, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Jeremy M. Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Amit X. Garg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Nephrology- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada
- Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|