Use of peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: a multicenter observational study

Is It Time to Give Peritoneal Dialysis Its Due Place in Managing Acute Kidney Injury: Lessons Learnt from COVID-19 Pandemic

Despite comparable outcomes with the extracorporeal dialysis modalities, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is seldom considered a viable option for managing acute kidney injury (AKI) in developed and resource-rich countries, where continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) are the mainstay of treating AKI. PD has fewer infrastructure requirements and has been shown to save lives during conflicts, natural disasters, and pandemics. During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the developed world was confronted with a sudden surge in critically ill AKI patients requiring renal replacement therapy. There were acute shortages of CRRT machines and the trained staff to deliver those treatments. Some centres developed acute PD programmes to circumvent these issues with good results. This experience re-emphasised the suitability of PD for managing AKI. It also highlighted the need to review the current management strategies for AKI in developed countries and consider incorporating PD as a viable tool for suitable patients. This article reviews the current evidence of using PD in AKI, attempts to clarify some misconceptions about PD in AKI, and argues in favour of developing acute PD programmes.

Dialysis resource allocation in critical care: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the promise of big data analytics

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented burden on intensive care units (ICUs). With increased demands and limited supply, critical care resources, including dialysis machines, became scarce, leading to the undertaking of value-based cost-effectiveness analyses and the rationing of resources to deliver patient care of the highest quality. A high proportion of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU required dialysis, resulting in a major burden on resources such as dialysis machines, nursing staff, technicians, and consumables such as dialysis filters and solutions and anticoagulation medications. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based big data analytics are now being utilized in multiple data-driven healthcare services, including the optimization of healthcare system utilization. Numerous factors can impact dialysis resource allocation to critically ill patients, especially during public health emergencies, but currently, resource allocation is determined using a small number of traditional factors. Smart analytics that take into account all the relevant healthcare information in the hospital system and patient outcomes can lead to improved resource allocation, cost-effectiveness, and quality of care. In this review, we discuss dialysis resource utilization in critical care, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and how AI can improve resource utilization in future public health emergencies. Research in this area should be an important priority.

Peritoneal Dialysis in Critically Ill Patients: Time for a Critical Reevaluation?

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) as an AKI treatment in adults was widely accepted in critical care settings well into the 1980s. The advent of extracorporeal continuous KRT led to widespread decline in the use of PD for AKI across high-income countries. The lack of familiarity and comfort with the use of PD in critical care settings has also led to lack of use even among those receiving maintenance PD. Many critical care units reflexively convert patients receiving maintenance PD to alternative dialysis therapies at admission. Renewed interest in the use of PD for AKI therapy has emerged due to its increasing use in low- and middle-income countries. In high-income countries, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, saw PD for AKI used early on, where many critical care units were in crisis and relied on PD use when resources for other AKI therapy modalities were limited. In this review, we highlight advantages and disadvantages of PD in critical care settings and indications and contraindications for its use. We provide an overview of literature to support both PD treatment during AKI and its continuation as a maintenance therapy during critical illness. For AKI therapy, we further discuss establishment of PD access, PD prescription management, and complication monitoring and treatment. Finally, we discuss expansion in the use of PD for AKI therapy extending beyond its role during times of resource constraints.

COVID-19 and Kidney Disease

COVID-19 can cause acute kidney injury and may cause or exacerbate chronic kidney diseases, including glomerular diseases. SARS-CoV-2 infection of kidney cells has been reported, but it remains unclear if viral infection of kidney cells causes disease. The most important causes of kidney injury in patients with COVID-19 include impaired renal perfusion and immune dysregulation. Chronic kidney disease, especially kidney failure with kidney replacement therapy and kidney transplant, is associated with markedly increased COVID-19 mortality. Persons with severe kidney disease have been excluded from most clinical trials of COVID-19 therapies, so therapeutic approaches must be extrapolated from studies of patients without kidney disease. Some medications used to treat COVID-19 should be avoided or used at reduced dosages in patients with severe kidney disease and in kidney transplant recipients. Additional research is needed to determine the optimal strategies to prevent and treat COVID-19 in patients with kidney disease.

Outcomes of PD for AKI treatment during COVID-19 in New York City: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis associated with COVID-19 led to the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) for the treatment of AKI. This study aims to compare in-hospital all-cause mortality and kidney recovery between patients with AKI who received acute PD versus extracorporeal dialysis (intermittent haemodialysis and continuous kidney replacement therapy).

METHODS

In a retrospective observational study of 259 patients with AKI requiring dialysis during the COVID-19 surge during Spring 2020 in New York City, we compared 30-day all-cause mortality and kidney recovery between 93 patients who received acute PD at any time point and 166 patients who only received extracorporeal dialysis. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to compare survival and logistic regression was used to compare kidney recovery.

RESULTS

The mean age was 61 ± 11 years; 31% were women; 96% had confirmed COVID-19 with median follow-up of 21 days. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, oxygenation and laboratory values prior to starting dialysis, the use of PD was associated with a lower mortality rate compared to extracorporeal dialysis with a hazard ratio of 0.48 (95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.82, p = 0.008). At discharge or on day 30 of hospitalisation, there was no association between dialysis modality and kidney recovery (p = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PD for the treatment of AKI was not associated with worse clinical outcomes when compared to extracorporeal dialysis during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. Given the inherent selection biases and residual confounding in our observational study, research with a larger cohort of patients in a more controlled setting is needed to confirm our findings.

Peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury: back on the front-line

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) for acute kidney injury (AKI) has been available for nearly 80 years and has been through periods of use and disuse largely determined by availability of other modalities of kidney replacement therapy and the relative enthusiasm of clinicians. In the past 10 years there has been a resurgence in the use of acute PD globally, facilitated by promotion of PD for AKI in lower resource countries by nephrology organizations effected through the Saving Young Lives program and collaborations with the World Health Organisation, the development of guidelines standardizing prescribing practices and finally the COVID-19 pandemic. This review highlights the history of PD for AKI and looks at misconceptions about efficacy as well as the available evidence demonstrating that acute PD is a safe and lifesaving therapy with comparable outcomes to other modalities of treatment.

Outcomes following peritoneal dialysis for COVID-19-induced AKI: A literature review

Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been shown to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 disease. Due to increasing number of cases in pandemic, there is a significant shortage of medical facilities and equipment in relation to patient load. In low resource settings where access to intermittent haemodialysis (HD) or continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is limited, peritoneal dialysis (PD) may play a vital role in the management of COVID-19-induced AKI. A literature search using Medline/PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane register was performed using following search strategy: (((COVID 19) OR (SARS-CoV-2)) AND (((acute kidney injury) OR (acute renal failure)) OR (acute renal dysfunction))) AND (peritoneal dialysis). Search strategy yielded total 79 articles. After going through titles and abstracts, full text of 15 articles was obtained. Finally, six studies were included in the review after exclusion of 10 studies. Five studies were single centre and one study was multicentric; four studies were conducted in the United States and one in the United Kingdom; PD catheter placement was done by surgeons in three studies and by nephrologist in one study. The mortality reported in the studies varied from 43% to as high as 63%.

Peritoneal Dialysis as a Renal Replacement Therapy Modality for Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

Since the advent and predominant use of extracorporeal therapies for renal replacement therapies for acute kidney injury, the use of peritoneal dialysis has largely been limited to specific resource-limited settings. This review highlights the current data available for the utilization of peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury. Though the current randomized controlled trials have small patient numbers, they have demonstrated peritoneal dialysis to be an appropriate modality for dialysis therapy in acute kidney injury. Current outcomes do not show a difference in mortality, renal recovery rates, or infectious complications when compared to extracorporeal treatments. However, there is a marked heterogeneity in these trials, and more standardized reporting of trial design, techniques, complications, and outcomes is needed.

COVID-19 Survival and its impact on chronic kidney disease

Up to 87% of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experience chronic sequelae following infection. The long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on kidney function is largely unknown at this point in the COVID-19 pandemic. In this review, we highlight the current understanding of the pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated kidney injury and the impact COVID-19 may have on long-term kidney function. COVID-19-induced acute kidney injury may lead to tubular injury, endothelial injury, and glomerular injury. We highlight histopathologic correlates from large kidney biopsy and autopsy series. By conducting a comprehensive review of published literature to date, we summarize the rates of recovery from COVID-19-associated-AKI. Finally, we discuss how certain genetic differences, including APOL1 risk alleles (a risk factor for collapsing glomerulopathy), coupled with systemic healthcare disparities, may lead to a disproportionate burden of post-COVID-19-kidney function decline among racial and ethnic minority groups. We highlight the need for prospective studies to determine the true incidence of chronic kidney disease burden after COVID-19.

Innovationen in der Peritonealdialyse

Die Peritonealdialyse (PD) war früher eine geläufige Behandlung beim akuten dialysepflichtigen Nierenversagen. Zugunsten kontinuierlicher, extrakorporaler Nierenersatzverfahren verschwand sie von der Bildfläche der westlichen Welt, wohingegen sie in strukturarmen Ländern aufgrund ihrer Simplizität und geringen Ressourcenintensität weiter eingesetzt wird. Die Engpässe in der medizinischen Versorgung im Rahmen der COVID-19(„coronavirus disease 2019“)-Pandemie führten kürzlich zu erneuter weltweiter Beachtung der PD als sichere Option beim akuten dialysepflichtigen Nierenversagen. Von der Einführung biokompatibler Lösungen vor 20 Jahren war eine Reduktion von Mortalität oder technischem Versagen erwartet worden. Leider konnten Studien dieses bisher allenfalls andeuten, nicht aber beweisen. Eine innovative Option stellen immunmodulatorische Adjuvanzien dar, die die lokale Immunkompetenz verbessern und den Verlust der Funktion des Peritoneums verhindern sollen. Derzeit rückt die Vision einer tragbaren künstlichen Niere immer näher. Auch eine Intensivierung der Dialysedosis erscheint mit minimaler Dialysatmenge erreichbar. In Zeiten der globalen Erderwärmung könnten durch die Regeneration von Dialysat nicht nur relevante Mengen an Wasser eingespart, sondern auch die CO₂-Bilanz günstig beeinflusst werden. Zusammenfassend erlebt die PD derzeit einen zweiten Frühling. Dieser Artikel beschreibt die derzeitigen und zukünftigen Entwicklungen dieses Verfahrens.

Timing of Kidney Support Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: What Are We Waiting For?

The optimal timing of kidney support therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) without life-threatening complications related to AKI is controversial. Recent multicenter, randomized, controlled studies have questioned the need for earlier initiation of therapy, despite one study showing a benefit in survival and others with no differences in mortality based on the timing of kidney support therapy initiation. These findings reflect the uncertainties in decisions to initiate kidney support therapy, which should ideally be individualized according to the patient's comorbidities, severity of illness, trajectory of kidney function, and urine output as well as requirements for fluid balance and solute removal. A delayed approach could translate into a potentially reduced burden of dialysis dependence in addition to saving health resources. However, we must ascertain what constitutes the waiting period and the benefits and risks associated with this approach. This article reviews the concept of timing of dialysis in AKI, performs a critical assessment of the most important clinical trials in this topic, discusses ongoing research and knowledge gaps, and defines key research issues to address in the future.