Metal hypersensitivity in total knee arthroplasty: revision surgery using a ceramic femoral component - a case report

No difference in patient reported outcome and inflammatory response after coated and uncoated total knee arthroplasty - a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Allergies against implant materials are still not fully understood. Despite controversies about its relevance, some patients need treatment with hypoallergenic implants. This study compared coated and standard total knee arthroplasty (TKA) regarding inflammatory response and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

76 patients without self-reported allergies against implant materials were included in a RCT and received a coated or standard TKA of the same cemented posterior-stabilized knee system. 73 patients completed the 3-year follow-up. Two patients died and there was one revision surgery. Serum levels of cytokines with a possible role in implant allergy were measured in patient`s serum (IL-1beta, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN γ, TNF α) prior to, one and three years after surgery. Furthermore, PROMs including knee function (Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score) and health-related quality of life (QoL, EuroQuol questionnaire) were assessed. Additionally, 8 patients with patch-test proven skin allergy against implant materials who received the coated implant were assessed similarly and compared to a matched-pair group receiving the same implant.

RESULTS

There were no differences in function and QoL between the assessed groups at any follow-up. The majority of patients demonstrated no elevation of the measured blood cytokines. Cytokine patterns showed no differences between study groups at any follow-up. The allergy patients demonstrated slower functional improvement and minor differences in cytokine pattern. Yet these results were not significant. There were no differences in the matched-pair analysis.

CONCLUSION

We observed no relevant increase in serum cytokine levels in any group. The inflammatory response measured seems limited, even in allergy patients. Furthermore, there were no differences between coated and standard TKA in non-allergy patients in the 3-year Follow-Up period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in the US National Institutes of Health's database ( http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ) registry under NCT03424174 on 03/17/2016.

Long-term clinical results of alumina ceramic medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The newly-designed alumina ceramic medial pivot total knee prosthesis was introduced to reduce polyethylene wear and better fit the anatomical morphology of the Asian population. This study aimed to clarify the long-term clinical results of alumina medial pivot total knee arthroplasty over a minimum follow-up period of 10 years.

METHODS

The data of 135 consecutive patients who underwent primary alumina medial pivot total knee arthroplasty were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were examined over a minimum 10-year follow-up period. The knee range of motion, Knee Society Score (KSS) knee score, Knee Society Score function score, and radiological parameters were assessed. The survival rate was also evaluated by using reoperation and revision as endpoints.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period lasted 11.8 ± 1.4 years. Patients who were not followed accounted for 7.4% of the total cohort. Knee and function scores of KSS improved significantly following total knee arthroplasty (P < 0.001). In 27 individuals (28.1%), a radiolucent line was observed. Aseptic loosening occurred in three cases (3.1%). The survival rates for reoperation and revision were 94.8% and 95.8% 10 years after the operation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

During a minimum 10-year follow-up period, the present model of alumina medial pivot total knee arthroplasty showed good clinical outcomes and survival rates.

Examination of colorectal cancer cases with metal allergy

PURPOSE

To report our initiatives and treatment results for patients with colorectal cancer with metal allergy.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients (2.6%) with a history of metal contact dermatitis were identified among 1027 patients who underwent curative resection of colorectal cancer from 2014 to 2020. The results of the patch test, perioperative results, and postoperative colonoscopy findings were also investigated.

RESULTS

The patch test for metal allergens and staples was performed in 21 patients (77.8%), and 13 of them (61.9%) tested positive for at least one metal allergen. Ni (38.1%), Co (28.6%), and Pd (19.0%) showed higher positive rates than other metals, and 1 patient (4.8%) tested positive for staples. Stapled anastomosis/suturing was performed as planned in 15 of 27 patients. In 10 patients, the anastomosis method was changed from stapled to hand-sewn according to the no-patch test results (60%), positivity for multiple metals (20%), positivity for staples (10%), and surgeon's judgment (10%). No complications and abnormal colonoscopy findings were found to be associated with stapled anastomosis/suturing.

CONCLUSION

The patch test is useful for selecting an optimal anastomosis method for patients with suspected metal allergy.

Titanium niobium nitride knee implants are not inferior to chrome cobalt components for primary total knee arthroplasty at medium-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Oxidized zirconium (Oxinium), titanium nitride (TiN) or titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN) coated implants became in recent years available for an increasing amount of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems. The hypothesis of this study was that the use of TiNbN-coated components would not lead to inferior results compared to conventional implants and that none of the metal hypersensitivity patients receiving TiNbN-coated implants would require revision for metal allergy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study compared 53 Titanium Niobium Nitride coated TKA with 103 conventional chrome cobalt implants of the same design. Patients were evaluated at a minimal follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

No differences in clinical, radiological or patient-reported outcome measurements were observed between these groups. A survivorship of 96% without differences in revision rates was observed at medium-term follow-up of 6.5 years.

DISCUSSION

Metal allergy leading to contact or generalized dermatitis after TKA is very rare and usually linked to chrome or cobalt hypersensitivity. Nickel release from knee implants has not been shown to lead to cutaneous symptoms, but unexplained pain and swelling, peri-prosthetic osteolysis and component loosening remain potential issues not fully understood. The use of coated implants eliminates this factor from the diagnostic equation in case of postoperative dissatisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The use of titanium niobium nitride coated implants for primary knee osteoarthritis in self-reported metal hypersensitivity patients shows similar outcomes and survivorship rates as conventional chrome cobalt TKA, with no revisions for allergy at medium-term follow-up.

Poor Correlation Among Metal Hypersensitivity Testing Modalities and Inferior Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

Background

Metal allergy testing may influence clinical decision-making for patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Limited data were found to examine the consistency of available testing modalities. This study compares different metal allergy test results and clinical outcomes after primary and revision TKAs in patients with and without metal hypersensitivity.

Methods

Primary (n = 28) and revision (n = 20) TKA patients receiving hypoallergenic implants for metal allergies diagnosed by skin patch testing (SPT), lymphocyte proliferation testing (LPT), or lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) were retrospectively reviewed. The agreement between tests was assessed by percentage and kappa statistic within patients who used multiple testing modalities. Postoperative clinical outcomes of these patients were compared to those of patients without metal hypersensitivity matched by age (±5 years), body mass index (±5), gender, and follow-up duration (±2 years).

Results

SPT and LPT showed weak agreement for nickel and minimal agreement for cobalt. SPT and LTT showed minimal agreement for nickel; weak agreement for titanium, bone cement, vanadium, and zirconium; but strong agreement for chromium and cobalt. LPT and LTT agreement was weak. Compared to matched controls, metal hypersensitivity patients undergoing primary TKAs with hypoallergenic implants experienced less improvement in Knee Society Scores, Veterans RAND 12 physical component scores, and range of motion. Patients undergoing revision TKAs for multiple indications including metal hypersensitivity had worse clinical outcomes with significantly worse improvements in Knee Society functional scores compared to matched controls.

Conclusions

Metal allergy tests produce conflicting results. Hypersensitivity patients may experience inferior clinical outcomes even with hypoallergenic implants. Clinician awareness may influence the choice of testing and improve preoperative counseling of this patient population.

Clinical Results of Revision TKA in Patients With Presumed Metal and Cement Allergy

BACKGROUND

Metal and cement allergy affects a small subset of patients, causing severe pain and often systemic reaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Revision with ceramic-surfaced femoral components has been reported to resolve these symptoms of metal allergy, but no solution currently is available for patients with allergies to metal and bone cement.

METHODS

Five patients (5 knees) with documented metal allergy were revised with custom porous-coated ceramic femoral components (Magnesia-stabilized Zirconia) from January 2007 to January 2013. An additional 23 patients (23 knees) met inclusion criteria from 2007 to 2015, but because the ceramic implant was unavailable, they underwent different treatment based on their underlying allergy to metal, cement, or both. Inclusion criteria included the history of clinically documented severe metal allergy, severe pain, swelling, and effusion >1 year after TKA, negative workup for infection, loosening, and ligament imbalance. Knee Society scores were compared for each cohort.

RESULTS

Mean Knee Society scores for all 5 patients revised with custom cementless ceramic femoral components improved significantly for objective score (preoperative, 39 ± 5; most recent visit, 90 ± 2) and function score (preoperative, 33 ± 8; most recent visit 93 ± 4) (P < .0001). The 12 knees revised with off-the-shelf cemented ceramic-coated femoral components had similar results. The 7 unrevised knees (including 4 knees with allergy to metal and bone cement) and the 4 knees revised with standard CoCr femoral components did not improve and worsened over time.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms resolved in the 5 patients revised with custom ceramic implants and in the 12 patients revised with ceramic-coated components, but did not improve in the patients unrevised or revised with CoCr femoral components. Symptoms presumed to be associated with metal or cement allergy improve with the use of ceramic femoral surfaces, but patients who are allergic both to metals and bone cement would be candidates only for porous-coated ceramic implants fixed without bone cement.

Designing and in vitro testing of a novel patient-specific total knee prosthesis using the probabilistic approach

In order to prevent failure as well as ensure comfort, patient-specific modelling for prostheses has been gaining interest. However, deterministic analyses have been widely used in the design process without considering any variation/uncertainties related to the design parameters of such prostheses. Therefore, this study aims to compare the performance of patient-specific anatomic Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with off-the-shelf TKA. In the patient-specific model, the femoral condyle curves were considered in the femoral component's inner and outer surface design. The tibial component was designed to completely cover the tibia cutting surface. In vitro experiments were conducted to compare these two models in terms of loosening of the components. A probabilistic approach based on the finite element method was also used to compute the probability of failure of both models. According to the deterministic analysis results, 103.10 and 21.67 MPa von Mises stress values were obtained for the femoral component and cement in the anatomical model, while these values were 175.86 and 25.76 MPa, respectively, for the conventional model. In order to predict loosening damage due to local osteolysis or stress shield, it was determined that the deformation values in the examined cement structures were 15% lower in the anatomical model. According to probabilistic analysis results, it was observed that the probability of encountering an extreme value for the anatomical model is far less than that of the conventional model. This indicates that the anatomical model is safer than the conventional model, considering the failure scenarios in this study.

Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty : a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach

Aims

Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence.

Results

We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent.

Conclusion

Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785–795.

Periprosthetic Tissue Reaction Independent of LTT Result and Implanted Materials in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

An allergic reaction may rarely cause a painful or stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no consensus diagnostic criteria for TKA immune failure exist. Lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) measures immune sensitivity to various materials, but its role in diagnosing an allergic reaction to a TKA has not been established. This study compares TKA periprosthetic tissues in a) LTT-positive versus -negative patients and b) patients with conventional CoCrNi versus hypoallergenic implants.

METHODS

Periprosthetic tissues from 26 revision cases of well-fixed, aseptic, but painful or stiff TKAs were analyzed. Twelve patients LTT positive for nickel (Ni) were matched as a cohort to 6 LTT-negative patients. In 4 patients LTT positive for Ni, tissue from first revision of CoCrNi implants was compared with tissue from subsequent revision of hypoallergenic implants. Histology was evaluated using the aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) score.

RESULTS

No correlation was found between LTT and any ALVAL score component. The mean total ALVAL score was 3.8 ± 1.5 for LTT-negative patients and 3.3 ± 1.2 for LTT-positive patients (P = .44). The mean total ALVAL score at revision of CoCrNi implants was 3.0 ± 1.8 compared with 5.8 ± 0.5 at rerevision of hypoallergenic implants (P = .053).

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic TKA tissue reactions were indistinguishable between LTT-positive and -negative patients. LTT does not predict the periprosthetic tissue response. ALVAL scores of hypoallergenic revision implant tissue trended higher than primary CoCrNi implant tissue. A positive LTT may not indicate that a periprosthetic immune reaction is the cause of pain and stiffness after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3, retrospective cohort study.

Preliminary In Vitro Wear Assessment of Ceramic Cemented Femoral Components Coupled with Polyethylene Menisci

Success of total knee replacement (TKR) depends on the prosthetic design and materials. The use of metal components is well established with the disadvantage of allergic reactions. Ceramics have been recently proposed because of high wear resistance, excellent biocompatibility, wettability, and suitable mechanical properties. This study was aimed at investigating in vitro wear resistance of Zirconia Toughened Alumina (ZTA)/Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) of TKR femoral components. An in vitro protocol was designed with the application of relevant load profile, 6-degrees-of-freedom knee simulator, and 8 × 10⁵ cycles on the ZTA/UHMWPE configuration under bovine calf serum. Before and after wear test, the femoral components were investigated by using the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and the X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analyses, and stylus surface roughness measurements. The proposed pre-clinical test yielded repeatable results. In particular, gravimetric results showed that, after 8 × 10⁵ cycles, the mean weight loss of the polyethylene mobile components is 5.3 ± 1.1 mg. The surface roughness measurements (Ra_max) performed after the wear test showed no significant variation on the UHMWPE menisci. A slight increase of roughness has been found on the ZTA (0.02 µm before wear test, 0.28 µm after the test). SEM observations did not show significant modification of the surface morphology. Tetragonal to monoclinic phase ratio was measured by XRD before and after wear test to evaluate stability of tetragonal ZrO₂ phase. Minimal conversion of tetragonal to monoclinic phase was found from 5.4 to 8%. Although this study is a preliminary evaluation limited to in vitro tests, it provides novel pre-clinical indications about the potential of ceramic TKR femoral components.

Early Outcomes of an Alternative Bearing Surface in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Self-reported Metal Allergy

Background

Most implants for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are comprised of alloys that contain nickel. Controversy exists whether metal allergies produce negative effects and affect clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review a minimum 2-year follow-up with an ion-bombarded titanium TKA implant in patients with reported metal sensitivity.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent primary TKA with the ion-bombarded titanium Vanguard (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) implant with 2-year minimum follow-up was performed from 2008 through 2017. The query revealed 346 patients (451 knees) with minimum 2-year follow-up. The mean age was 64.7 years, the mean body mass index was 35.1 kg/m², and 95% of patients were women.

Results

The mean follow-up was 4.6 years. The mean range of motion improved from 109° to 112° (P = .03), University of California Los Angeles activity scale from 4.1 to 5.1 (P < .001), Knee Society Clinical scores from 36 to 89 (P < .001), and Knee Society Functional scores from 48 to 73 (P < .001). There were 5 (1.1%) revisions: 2 infections (2-staged exchange), 1 tibial revision for aseptic loosening after a fall, and 2 bearing exchanges for instability. Other surgeries were open reduction internal fixation of periprosthetic fracture, 1 arthroscopic release of snapping popliteus, and 4 local wound incision and debridement (2 superficial infections and 2 nonhealing wounds). Manipulation under anesthesia was required in 27 (6%) patients.

Conclusions

These early results are encouraging for the use of alternative metal titanium alloy implants in metal-sensitive patients undergoing primary TKA. At 4.6 years of mean follow-up, patients had substantial improvement in the range of motion and clinical outcomes with a low frequency of revision.

Increased risk of eczema after joint replacement: A population-based retrospective cohort study

There are very few reports of eczema and other prosthetic-related allergic skin complications following arthroplasty. We aimed to assess the risk of eczema after joint replacement.We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study in 2024 joint replacement patients using the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. For comparison, 8096 controls were selected, with 4 control subjects for each joint replacement patient matched for age, sex, and index year, to assess eczema risk. We examined 14-year cumulative eczema incidence associated with age, sex, immunity, disease history, and joint replacement location.Eczema rates in the joint replacement patients were 38% higher than in the control group (57.90 vs 41.84 per 1000 person-years, respectively). Compared with the control group, joint replacement patients showed a 1.35-fold increased risk of eczema according to the multivariable Cox model (95% Confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-1.49). Knee replacement patients had higher eczema risk compared with the control group (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.33-1.70). Stratified by study period, the joint replacement cohort had a higher eczema risk after the 3-month follow-up.Our study revealed that joint arthroplasty increased risk of eczema in this 14-year follow-up study, and this was not related to personal atopic history or gender.

Self-Reported Metal Allergy and Early Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty

The impact of self-reported metal allergy (SRMA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. In the absence of objective tests, SRMA is often used as a screening tool for implant selection. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of SRMA on early outcomes after TKA. Between 2010 and 2014, 168 patients with SRMA underwent TKA; 150 (89%) received nickel-free implants, and 18 (11%) received cobalt-chrome implants that contained nickel. Mean age was 67 years, and 95% were female. A cohort of 858 TKA patients (mean age, 68 years) without SRMA matched by sex served as the control group. Outcomes included Knee Society Score (function [KSS-F] and knee [KSS-K]), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, knee flexion, further surgery, and complications. No differences were seen in KSS-F and KSS-K between patients with and without SRMA. The mean WOMAC pain scores were 89.1 for patients with SRMA and 85.2 for patients without SRMA (P=.030). Stiffness and physical function scores were similar. Knee flexion was similar. No differences were found between nickel-free and cobalt-chrome SRMA groups. Patients with SRMA and those without demonstrated similar early functional outcomes. Patients with SRMA who received standard cobalt-chrome implants had no significant difference in functional outcomes compared with patients with nickel-free implants. Better identifiers of patients at risk for adverse events due to implant material are needed. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):330-334.].

Revision temporomandibular joint arthroplasty for the treatment of acquired metal allergy and review of the literature

The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of patients who received revision temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthroplasty for the treatment of acquired metal allergy. It was hypothesized that subjects would have significant improvements in pain, swelling, and function. Patients who underwent TMJ revision due to nickel allergy were identified retrospectively. Outcomes documented included the presence or absence of facial erythema and facial swelling. Maximum incisal opening was also measured. Additional outcomes collected included age at initial surgery, initial TMJ device type, presenting symptoms, and TMJ device used for surgical revision. Four patients were identified with a nickel allergy to their TMJ prosthesis (containing nickel). All subjects experienced pain and swelling as their primary symptoms prior to the revision, with two subjects showing dermatological symptoms of overlying erythema. The four female subjects underwent exchange of their previously implanted prosthesis with a titanium alloy prosthesis. Postoperatively, all subjects showed improvements in pain score, resolution of swelling and erythema, and improvements in maximum incisal opening. This small case series suggests that revision TMJ arthroplasty with a titanium alloy prosthesis is a potential treatment for acquired metal allergy from traditional TMJ prosthesis implantation.

Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty

Background

Metal sensitivity as a cause for painful joint replacement has become increasingly prevalent; however, there is a lack of reported clinical outcome data from total knee arthroplasty patients with metal allergies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients presenting with a painful total knee arthroplasty with a positive metal sensitivity have improved outcomes following revision to a hypoallergenic implant.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted for patients that underwent a revision total knee arthroplasty after metal sensitivity testing over a 3-year period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. Based on the results of sensitivity testing, patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty to a hypoallergenic component or a standard component. Following revision, patients returned to the clinic at an interval of 6 weeks, 5 months, and 12 months for functional, pain, and satisfaction assessment. Outcomes were compared within and between sensitivity groups.

Results

Of the included patients, 78.3% (39/46) were positive for metal sensitivity. The most common metal sensitivity was to nickel (79.5%, 32/39). Both non-reactive and reactive patients significantly improved in range of motion after revision arthroplasty. The reactive group saw a 37.8% decrease in pain at 6 weeks post-revision (p < 0.001) Whereas, the non-reactive group only saw a moderate, non-significant improvement in pain reduction at 6 weeks post-revision (27.0%; p = 0.29). Frequency of pain experienced did not vary significantly between groups. Maximum metal lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) sensitivity score did not correlate with pain level at the time of revision (R² = 0.02, p = 0.38) or percent improvement after revision (R² = 0.001, p = 0.81). Overall, all patients reported being very satisfied after revision total knee arthroplasty; there was no difference between positive and negative sensitivity groups (W = 62, p = 0.89).

Conclusions

Patients presenting with a painful knee arthroplasty and positive metal LTT have improved pain scores, walking function, and range of motion following revision to a hypoallergenic component. This study also provides a treatment algorithm for patients presenting with a painful knee replacement, in order to provide effective and timely diagnosis and management.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1228-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Enhanced adhesion of plasma-sprayed commercially pure titanium porous coatings to polished Mg-PSZ ceramic substrates

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of a plasma sprayed titanium porous coating on polished magnesia-stabilized zirconia (Mg-PSZ) ceramic surfaces. We hypothesized that diffusion bonding was responsible for the adhesion of the coating to the ceramic substrate. Mg-PSZ tensile test coupons were vibratory polished (roughness Sa = 0.50 μm) or vibratory polished/lapped (Sa = 0.12 μm) before coating and testing. The exposed surfaces after tensile testing were examined by energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Mg-PSZ shear test coupons were vibratory polished (Sa = 0.48 μm). As the surface roughness of the ceramic substrate decreased by a factor of 4.175, the coating tensile strength increased from 62.6 to 66.8 MPa, comparable to that of porous coated cobalt chromium (CoCr) and titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) coupons. EDX analyses found titanium everywhere on the ceramic surface after the titanium layer was pulled off with tensile testing, even on areas that appeared to be "clean" to the naked eye. This suggested that titanium oxide compounds were present at the interface, where the oxygen required could only result from diffusion bonding across the interface. Diffusion bonding may also explain the significantly higher amounts of zirconium on the coating surface that had been pulled off the smoother lapped ceramic coupons. The measured shear strength of porous-coated ceramic coupons was significantly higher than that of CoCr and Ti-6Al-4V coupons. The superior adherence of the titanium coating to Mg-PSZ suggests this process has great clinical potential in arthroplasty, especially for patients with metal sensitivity. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 1925-1932, 2019.

Lymphocyte Transformation Testing (LTT) in Cases of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Little Relationship to Histopathologic Findings and Revision Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The utilization of lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) has increased for diagnosing metal sensitivity associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but its validity for the diagnosis of TKA failure due to an immune reaction has not been established. In this study, we sought to characterize the relationship of a positive LTT result to histopathologic findings and clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 27 well-fixed, aseptic, primary TKA cases in which the patient had persistent pain and/or stiffness and underwent revision due to a suspected metal allergy to nickel, as determined on the basis of positive LTT. Revision procedures were performed by a single experienced arthroplasty surgeon. Periprosthetic tissue samples obtained at the time of revision surgery were scored using the aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) scoring system.

RESULTS

Eight patients were categorized as mildly reactive; 8 patients, moderately reactive; and 11 patients, highly reactive to nickel by LTT. The predominant findings on routine histopathologic analysis were fibrosis and varying degrees of lymphocytic infiltration in 17 (63%) of the 27 cases. The average ALVAL score of the cohort was 3.1 ± 1.9, of a maximum score of 10. Average Knee Society Score (KSS) values improved post-revision, as did range of motion (all p < 0.01). Neither LTT stimulation index as a continuous variable nor as a categorical variable (mildly reactive, moderately reactive, highly reactive) was correlated with ALVAL score, pre-revision function (as assessed by KSS-clinical, KSS-functional, and range of motion), or change in function at the most recent follow-up (0.015 < r < 0.30, 0.13 < p < 0.95). In addition, the ALVAL score did not correlate significantly with either pre-revision or post-revision KSS or range of motion (0.061 < r < 0.365, 0.09 < p < 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this analysis, including histopathologic assessment, LTT results alone were insufficient for the diagnosis of TKA failure due to an immune reaction. A positive LTT may not indicate that an immune reaction is the cause of pain and stiffness post-TKA. The role of LTT in assessing TKA failure from an immune reaction needs further investigation. Diagnostic criteria for such TKA failure need to be established.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What Is the Incidence of Cobalt-Chromium Damage Modes on the Bearing Surface of Contemporary Femoral Component Designs for Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of metal release in contemporary total knee arthroplasty and the patient-related factors associated with this release.

METHODS

In total, 256 retrieved cobalt-chromium femoral components were collected through a multi-institutional orthopedic implant retrieval program (implanted: 1-15 years). Implants were mainly revised for loosening (84/256), instability (62/256), and infection (46/256). Third-body damage was assessed using a semiquantitative scoring method. Microscale electro-corrosion damage (MECD) was evaluated using digital optical microscopy. Radii of curvature were measured from representative components to calculate anterior-posterior and medial-lateral ratios. Femoral component surface roughness was measured using a white light interferometer. Using a multivariable linear model, associations between damage score, implant, and patient factors were tested. Spearman's ρ correlation tests were performed to determine the association between roughness measurements and damage score.

RESULTS

Mild to severe damage was observed in 52% (134/256) of the components. In the multivariable linear model, anterior-posterior ratio (β = -8.07; P < .001), loosening (β = -0.52; P = .006), and patient weight (β = 0.01; P = .007) were associated with damage score. Suspected MECD damage was observed in 82% (209/256) of components. The R_a value (ρ = 0.196; P = .002) and R_q value (ρ = 0.157; P = .012) increased as the damage score increased.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this retrieval study support that similar damage mechanisms exist in contemporary and long-term total knee arthroplasty devices. Additionally, we observed associations between loosening, anterior-posterior conformity, and patient weight with increased surface damage.

What role does metal allergy sensitization play in total knee arthroplasty revision?

Background

Clinicians are often faced with the decision whether to revise a painful total knee replacement in patients who have chronic vague pain with no apparent explanation. A sensitive metal testing assay called the lymphocyte stimulation test has been used to detect nickel sensitization in patients with orthopedic implants. We hypothesize that nickel sensitization plays a role in the pathology of failed joint arthroplasty in patients with unexplained dissatisfaction.

Methods

32 patients with symptomatic total knee arthroplasty without obvious mechanical findings were tested prior to revision surgery. 19 nickel-sensitized and 13 non-sensitized patients were compared by cell counts of synovium surgical specimens for CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cell lines. Patients were then revised with ceramic-coated implants. Secondary evaluation of functional outcomes, range of motion, and pain relief were assessed.

Results

Nickel-sensitive patients showed a statistical increase in CD4⁺ reactivity compared to CD8⁺ reactivity. The ratio of CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T lymphocytes was 1.28 in nickel-sensitive patients versus 0.76 in the control (p = 0.009). There was no difference in functional scores, clinical scores, or range of motion after revision.

Conclusions

This study provides objective data via histological analysis in support of a nickel allergic sensitization in failed arthroplasties where clinical and/or radiographic abnormalities may not be apparent. Biopsy for CD4⁺/CD8⁺ cell counts may provide further proof of the existence of nickel sensitization in lymphocyte stimulation test positive patients, and more importantly, may implore the surgeon to consider low nickel implant design in these patients.

Vanadium allergy following total knee arthroplasty

Allergic reactions to metals following joint arthroplasty represent a rare and poorly understood phenomenon. Much is still unknown regarding the natural history of this complication, and how it can best be prevented and managed. We present a case of a 68-year-old woman who underwent a left total knee arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis. After an initial uneventful postoperative course, she developed a troublesome erythematous rash both around the incision site and over her trunk. Blood testing revealed no evidence of infection and clinically her prosthesis was functioning well. Skin patch testing revealed positive results for vanadium (+) and palladium (+). Her cutaneous symptoms are currently being managed conservatively and have shown a partial response to topical steroids. Revision surgery remains a long-term treatment option should conservative therapy fail; however, it would require a custom-made prosthesis as no standard tibial component is free from vanadium.

Long-Term Durability of Ceramic Tri-Condylar Knee Implants: A Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Ceramic bearings are not commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). So far, little information is available about whether long-term survivorship and good clinical outcomes can be ensured with ceramic knee implants. The purposes of the present study were to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes, and to assess the long-term durability of a ceramic tri-condylar implant.

METHODS

A total of 507 consecutive TKAs were carried out using a ceramic tri-condylar femoral implant. The posterior cruciate ligament was sacrificed, and all components were fixed with bone cement. Clinical outcomes were assessed retrospectively with the Knee Society scoring system. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was calculated to determine the cumulative survival rate.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-seven knees (114 patients) were available for clinical outcomes. The average range of flexion improved from 118.1° preoperatively to 123.7° at a minimum 15-year follow-up (P < .001). The average Knee Society knee score improved from 39.1 to 92.8 (P < .001). The functional score also improved from 36.0 to 47.0 (P < .001). With revision for any surgery or radiographic failure as the end point, Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 15 years was 94.0%. With revision of any component as the end point, the corresponding survivorship was 96.2%.

CONCLUSION

Clinically, the postoperative knee flexion range and Knee Society scores were good after long-term follow-up. The survivorship of the ceramic knee implant was excellent over the 15-year follow-up, and long-term durability was achieved, making ceramic a promising alternative material for the femoral component in TKA.

Allergies in orthopaedic and trauma surgery

Hypersensitivity reactions to implants in orthopaedic and trauma surgery are a rare but devastating complication. They are considered as a delayed-type of hypersensitivity reaction (type IV), characterized by an antigen activation of sensitized T-lymphocytes releasing various cytokines and may result in osteoclast activation and bone resorption. Potential haptens are originated from metal alloys or bone-cement. A meta-analysis has confirmed a higher probability of developing a metal hypersensitivity postoperatively and noted a greater risk of failed replacements compared to stable implants. Hypersensitivity to implants may present with a variety of symptoms such as pain, joint effusion, delayed wound/bone healing, persistent secretion, allergic dermatitis (localized or systemic), clicking noises, loss of joint function, instability and failure of the implant. Various diagnostic options have been offered, including patch testing, metal alloy patch testing, histology, lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay (MELISA), leukocyte migration inhibition test (LIF) and lymphocyte activation test (LAT). No significant differences between in vivo and in vitro methods have been found. Due to unconvincing evidence for screening methods, predictive tests are not recommended for routine performance. Infectious aetiology always needs to be excluded. As there is a lack of evidence on large-scale studies with regards to the optimal treatment option, management currently relies on individual case-by-case decisions. Several options for patients with (suspected) metal-related hypersensitivity exist and may include materials based on ceramic, titanium or oxinium or modified surfaces. Promising results have been reported, but long-term experience is lacking. More large-scaled studies are needed in this context. In patients with bone-cement hypersensitivity, the component suspected for hypersensitivity should be avoided. The development of (predictive) biomarkers is considered as a major contribution for the future.

Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article

BACKGROUND

There is little data on whether preexisting allergies to implant materials and bone cement have an impact on the outcome of TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This review article analyzes the current literature to evaluate the prevalence and importance of metal and cement allergies for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed using the following search criteria: "knee," "arthroplasty," and "allergy" as well as "knee," "arthroplasty," and "hypersensitivity."

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen articles were identified on PubMed, Seventy articles could be excluded by reviewing the title and abstract leaving 46 articles to be included for this review. The majority of the studies cited patch testing as the gold standard for screening and diagnosis of hypersensitivity following TKA. There is consensus that patients with self-reported allergies against metals or bone cement and positive patch test should be treated with hypoallergenic materials or cementless TKA. Treatment options include the following: coated titanium or cobalt-chromium implants, ceramic, or zirconium oxide implants.

CONCLUSION

Allergies against implant materials and bone cement are rare. Patch testing is recommended for patients with self-reported allergies. The use of special implants is recommended for patients with a confirmed allergy.

Revision total knee arthroplasty due to bone cement and metal hypersensitivity

INTRODUCTION

Hypersensitivity to implants is a rare complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Metal and, less frequently, bone cement can produce allergic symptomatology that if unresponsive to conservative treatment could lead to revision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present the case of a patient with generalized pruritus and metal taste starting during the first postoperative month after TKA. Dermal allergy exams revealed that the patient had hypersensitivity to nickel sulphate and cobalt chloride and bone cement. Conservative treatment with antihistamine medication and corticosteroids failed to control the symptoms. The patient underwent revision TKA with a hypoallergic prosthesis 8 months after the primary procedure.

RESULTS

Full disappearance of the symptoms occurred 3 months after revision. The latest follow-up evaluation (3 years post-revision) was unremarkable.

CONCLUSIONS

In our opinion, an exhaustive medical history should be obtained from every candidate for total joint replacement and in cases of prior severe allergic reactions to metals, plastics or glues, patch testing of the components of the future prosthesis should be done. When an already implanted prosthesis causes symptoms like pain, edema, pruritus, erythema, limited range of motion and increase in joint's temperature, the possibility of allergy to metals and/or bone cement (in case of cemented prosthesis) should be checked after the exclusion of other reasons like infection. If symptoms cannot be controlled by conservative measures, revision should be decided and carried out with hypoallergic prosthesis.

Diagnostic Algorithm for Residual Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Although total knee arthroplasty is a successful and cost-effective procedure, patient dissatisfaction remains as high as 50%. Postoperative residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty, with or without crepitation, is a major factor that contributes to patient dissatisfaction. The most common location for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty is anteriorly. Because residual pain has been associated with an un-resurfaced patella, this review includes only registry data and total knee arthroplasty with patella replacement. Some suggest that the pathogenesis of residual knee pain may be related to mechanical stimuli that activate free nerve endings around the patellofemoral joint. Various etiologies have been implicated in residual pain, including (1) low-grade infection, (2) midflexion instability, and (3) component malalignment with patellar maltracking. Less common causes include (4) crepitation and patellar clunk syndrome; (5) patellofemoral symptoms, including overstuffing and avascular necrosis of the patella; (6) early aseptic loosening; (7) hypersensitivity to metal or cement; (8) complex regional pain syndrome; and (9) pseudoaneurysm. Because all of these conditions can lead to residual pain, identifying the etiology can be a difficult diagnostic challenge. Often, patients with persistent pain and normal findings on radiographs and laboratory workup may benefit from a diagnostic injection or further imaging. However, up to 10% to 15% of patients with residual pain may have unexplained pain. This literature review summarizes the findings on the causes of residual pain and presents a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate an accurate diagnosis for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty.

Prospective comparative clinical study of ceramic and metallic femoral components for total knee arthroplasty over a five-year follow-up period

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a TKA system, comparing a ceramic (BIOLOX® delta) and metallic (Co28Cr6Mo) femoral component over a five-year follow-up period.

METHODS

Forty-three TKA patients (17 metallic and 26 ceramic femoral components) were enrolled in the study. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed preoperatively and at three, 12, 24 and 60months postoperatively, using the HSS-, WOMAC- and SF36-Scores, in addition to standardized X-rays.

RESULTS

The HSS-Score improved significantly from 58.7±12.7 points preoperatively to 88.5±12.3 points at five-years postoperative in the ceramic group, and 60.8±7.7 to 86.2±9.4 points in the metallic group. WOMAC- and SF-36-Scores showed significant improvement over time in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups for HSS-, WOMAC- and SF-36-Scores, nor for range of motion (p≤0.897) at any follow-up evaluation. Furthermore, radiological evaluation showed no implant loosening or migration in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-term outcomes for the ceramic femoral components demonstrated good clinical and radiological results, as well as comparable survivorship to the metallic femoral component of the same total knee system, and to other commonly used metallic total knee systems. Therefore, ceramic knee implants may be a promising solution for the population of patients with osteoarthritis and metal sensitivity. Long-term studies are required in order to confirm the positive mid-term clinical results, and to follow the implant survival rate in regard to the enhanced wear resistance of ceramic implants.

Allergy in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the facts

We explored the literature surrounding whether allergy and hypersensitivity has a clinical basis for implant selection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In error, the terms hypersensitivity and allergy are often used synonymously. Although a relationship is present, we could not find any evidence of implant failure due to allergy. There is however increasing basic science that suggests a link between loosening and metal ion production. This is not an allergic response but is a potential problem. With a lack of evidence logically there can be no justification to use 'hypoallergenic' implants in patients who have pre-existing skin sensitivity to the metals used in TKA.

Adhesive strength of total knee endoprostheses to bone cement – analysis of metallic and ceramic femoral components under worst-case conditions

Evaluation of the adhesive strength of femoral components to the bone cement is a relevant parameter for predicting implant safety. In the present experimental study, three types of cemented femoral components (metallic, ceramic and silica/silane-layered ceramic) of the bicondylar Multigen Plus knee system, implanted on composite femora were analysed. A pull-off test with the femoral components was performed after different load and several cementing conditions (four groups and n=3 components of each metallic, ceramic and silica/silane-layered ceramic in each group). Pull-off forces were comparable for the metallic and the silica/silane-layered ceramic femoral components (mean 4769 N and 4298 N) under standard test condition, whereas uncoated ceramic femoral components showed reduced pull-off forces (mean 2322 N). Loading under worst-case conditions led to decreased adhesive strength by loosening of the interface implant and bone cement using uncoated metallic and ceramic femoral components, respectively. Silica/silane-coated ceramic components were stably fixed even under worst-case conditions. Loading under high flexion angles can induce interfacial tensile stress, which could promote early implant loosening. In conclusion, a silica/silane-coating layer on the femoral component increased their adhesive strength to bone cement. Thicker cement mantles (>2 mm) reduce adhesive strength of the femoral component and can increase the risk of cement break-off.

Metal Hypersensitivity and Total Knee Arthroplasty

Metal hypersensitivity in patients with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a controversial topic. The diagnosis is difficult, given the lack of robust clinical validation of the utility of cutaneous and in vitro testing. Metal hypersensitivity after TKA is quite rare and should be considered after eliminating other causes of pain and swelling, such as low-grade infection, instability, component loosening or malrotation, referred pain, and chronic regional pain syndrome. Anecdotal observations suggest that two clinical presentations of metal hypersensitivity may occur after TKA: dermatitis or a persistent painful synovitis of the knee. Patients may or may not have a history of intolerance to metal jewelry. Laboratory studies, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein level, and knee joint aspiration, are usually negative. Cutaneous and in vitro testing have been reported to be positive, but the sensitivity and specificity of such testing has not been defined. Some reports suggest that, if metal hypersensitivity is suspected and nonsurgical measures have failed, then revision to components fabricated of titanium alloy or zirconium coating can be successful in relieving symptoms. Revision should be considered as a last resort, however, and patients should be informed that no evidence-based medicine is available to guide the management of these conditions, particularly for decisions regarding revision. Given the limitations of current testing methods, the widespread screening of patients for metal allergies before TKA is not warranted.

Selected aspects of the action of cobalt ions in the human body

Cobalt is widespread in the natural environment and can be formed as an effect of anthropogenic activity. This element is used in numerous industrial applications and nuclear power plants. Cobalt is an essential trace element for the human body and can occur in organic and inorganic forms. The organic form is a necessary component of vitamin B₁₂ and plays a very important role in forming amino acids and some proteins in nerve cells, and in creating neurotransmitters that are indispensable for correct functioning of the organism. Its excess or deficiency will influence it unfavourably. Salts of cobalt have been applied in medicine in the treatment of anaemia, as well as in sport as an attractive alternative to traditional blood doping. Inorganic forms of cobalt present in ion form, are toxic to the human body, and the longer they are stored in the body, the more changes they cause in cells. Cobalt gets into the body in several ways: firstly, with food; secondly by the respiratory system; thirdly, by the skin; and finally, as a component of biomaterials. Cobalt and its alloys are fundamental components in orthopaedic implants and have been used for about 40 years. The corrosion of metal is the main problem in the construction of implants. These released metal ions may cause type IV inflammatory and hypersensitivity reactions, and alternations in bone modelling that lead to aseptic loosening and implant failure. The ions of cobalt released from the surface of the implant are absorbed by present macrophages, which are involved in many of the processes associated with phagocytose orthopaedic biomaterials particles and release pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and prostaglandin.

Long-Term Fever After Hallux Valgus Surgery Secondary to Titanium Allergy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

We present the case of a patient who had experienced a fever of unknown cause for >7 months after surgical treatment for hallux valgus. A patch test revealed a positive reaction to a titanium alloy. All symptoms subsequently disappeared after we removed the implanted titanium screws. Histopathologic examination of the tissue surrounding the screws showed macrophage infiltration in the tissue. For >1 year after removal of the titanium screws, the patient's body temperature remained <37°C. These results support a diagnosis of titanium allergy in our patient. To the best of our knowledge, a long-term fever caused by an allergic reaction to mini-titanium screws of such a small size has not been reported. A review of 16 cases of titanium allergy reported in the published data confirmed that titanium allergy is extremely rare and that the clinical symptoms can vary. Titanium allergy should be suspected when a patient presents with a fever of unknown cause, delayed wound healing, dermatitis, or impaired fracture healing after internal fixation with titanium materials. A patch test for titanium or the lymphocyte transformation test could offer guidance for the clinical diagnosis of titanium allergy. Finally, we recommend that all patients should be asked whether they have a history of an allergy to any metal before surgery.

Prospective multi-centre study on a composite ceramic femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: Five-year clinical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Enhanced wear resistance of ceramics in general and improved mechanical characteristics of composite ceramics in terms of strength and resistance meet the demands for application in TKA. The aim of this prospective international multi-centre study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes of an unconstrained TKA with a composite ceramic femoral component.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients (109 knees) underwent TKA with the MULTIGEN-PLUS Ceramic Knee at seven centres in three European countries. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 12, 24 and 60 months, using HSS, WOMAC, SF-36 and standardised radiographs.

RESULTS

Mean HSS and WOMAC increased significantly from 55.1±11.5 (21-83) and 48.1±16.6 (3-90) preoperatively to 85.6±9.6 (49-98) and 73.3±20.4 (17-100) at 60 months. Mean SF-36 showed significant improvements in patients' quality of life (49.1±17.6 (12-96) preoperatively versus 67.7±23.1 (12-100) at 60 months). Non-progressive radiolucent lines (<1 mm) were observed around the femoral component in four cases. Neither implant migration nor loosening were registered. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 96.0% at 60 months (92.1-100%, CI 95%).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year implant survival rate of the ceramic knee is comparable to other metallic and ceramic unconstrained TKA systems. Although the assessment of long-term implant survivorship is still pending, the ceramic implants represent a promising solution for patients with allergies against metallic components and furthermore for the general osteoarthritis population due to enhanced wear resistance.

[Histopathological particle algorithm. Particle identification in the synovia and the SLIM]

BACKGROUND

In the histopathological diagnostics of synovitis and the synovium-like interface membrane (SLIM) the identification of crystals and crystal-like deposits and the associated inflammatory reactions play an important role. The multitude of endogenous crystals, the range of implant materials and material combinations, and the variability in the formation process of different particles explain the high morphological particle heterogeneity which complicates the diagnostic identification of diagnostic particles.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A simple histopathological particle algorithm has been designed which allows methodological particle identification based on (1) conventional transmitted light microscopy with a guide to particle size, shape and color, (2) optical polarization criteria and (3) enzyme histochemical properties (oil red staining and Prussian blue reaction). These methods, the importance for particle identification and the differential diagnostics from non-prosthetic materials are summarized in the so-called histopathological particle algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 35 cases of synovitis and SLIM were analyzed and validated according to these criteria. Based on these criteria and a dichotomous differentiation the complete spectrum of particles in the SLIM and synovia can be defined histopathologically.

CONCLUSION

For histopathological diagnosis a particle score for synovitis and SLIM is recommended to evaluate (1) the predominant type of prothetic wear debris with differentiation between microparticles, and macroparticles, (2) the presence of non-prosthesis material particles and (3) the quantification of particle-association necrosis and lymphocytosis. An open, continuously updated web-based particle algorithm would be helpful to address the issue of particle heterogeneity and include all new particle materials generated in a rapidly changing field.

Biomaterial hypersensitivity: is it real? Supportive evidence and approach considerations for metal allergic patients following total knee arthroplasty

The prospect of biomaterial hypersensitivity developing in response to joint implant materials was first presented more than 30 years ago. Many studies have established probable causation between first-generation metal-on-metal hip implants and hypersensitivity reactions. In a limited patient population, implant failure may ultimately be related to metal hypersensitivity. The examination of hypersensitivity reactions in current-generation metal-on-metal knee implants is comparatively limited. The purpose of this study is to summarize all available literature regarding biomaterial hypersensitivity after total knee arthroplasty, elucidate overall trends about this topic in the current literature, and provide a foundation for clinical approach considerations when biomaterial hypersensitivity is suspected.

Reduced UHMWPE wear using magnesia-stabilized zirconia instead of CoCr femoral components in a knee simulator

Magnesia-stabilized zirconia (Mg-PSZ) is stable and maintains a scratch-resistant surface in hip replacement, but is untested in knees. We assessed whether using Mg-PSZ instead of cobalt-chromium (CoCr) femoral components resulted in less tibial insert wear, and evaluated changes in topography and roughness of the femoral components. Inserts bearing against CoCr or Mg-PSZ were tested using standard (9 Mc) and aggressive (6 Mc) waveforms. Femoral component surface topography and roughness were evaluated before and after testing by optical profilometry. When bearing against Mg-PSZ, UHMWPE wear rate decreased by 73% (standard) and by 59% (aggressive conditions). After 15 Mc, CoCr components featured deep scratches, and roughness increased five-fold, while Mg-PSZ components were unchanged. Mg-PSZ femoral components may be indicated for high-demand patients and those with metal sensitivity.

Mechanically assisted taper corrosion in modular TKA

The purpose of this study was to characterize the prevalence of taper damage in modular TKA components. One hundred ninety-eight modular components were revised after 3.9±4.2 years of implantation. Modular components were evaluated for fretting corrosion using a semi-quantitative 4-point scoring system. Design features and patient information were assessed as predictors of fretting corrosion damage. Mild-to-severe fretting corrosion (score ≥2) was observed in 94/101 tapers on the modular femoral components and 90/97 tapers on the modular tibial components. Mixed alloy pairs (p=0.03), taper design (p<0.001), and component type (p=0.02) were associated with taper corrosion. The results from this study supported the hypothesis that there is taper corrosion in TKA. However the clinical implications remain unclear.

Ceramic femoral component fracture in total knee arthroplasty: an analysis using fractography, fourier-transform infrared microscopy, contact radiography and histology

Ceramic components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are evolving. We analyze the first case of BIOLOX delta ceramic femoral component fracture. A longitudinal midline fracture in the patellar groove was present, with an intact cement mantle and no bony defects. Fractographic analysis with laser scanning microscopy and white light interferometry showed no evidence of arrest lines, hackles, wake hackles, material flaws, fatigue or crack propagation. Analysis of periprosthetic tissues with Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) microscopy, contact radiography, histology, and subsequent digestion and high-speed centrifugation did not show ceramic debris. A macrophage-dominated response was present around polyethylene debris. We conclude that ceramic femoral component failure in this case was related to a traumatic event. Further research is needed to determine the suitability of ceramic components in TKA.

Total knee replacement system with a ceramic femoral component versus two traditional metallic designs: a prospective short-term study

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term outcome of the Multigen Plus system using a symmetric ceramic femoral component with that of 2 metallic total knee replacement (TKR) systems.

METHODS

60 patients (62 knees) with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis underwent primary TKR using the Genia system (n=20), the Multigen Plus system (n=17), and the Multigen Plus system with a ceramic femoral component (n=25). Outcome was evaluated pre- and post-operatively (at 3, 12, and 24 months) using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) score.

RESULTS

The 3 groups did not differ significantly at all 4 time points in terms of the HSS score, WOMAC score, and SF-36 score. The range of motion was significantly less in patients treated with the Genia system. Postoperatively, the HSS and WOMAC scores improved significantly in all 3 groups, whereas the SF-36 score improved significantly (at 12 and 24 months) only in patients treated with the Multigen Plus system with a ceramic femoral component. The implant position in most patients was optimal. All radiolucent lines were within 1 mm and did not progress.

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcome of the 3 TKR systems was comparable. Ceramic femoral components performed comparably to traditional metallic designs.

Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms

Aseptic loosening and other wear-related complications are some of the most frequent late reasons for revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Periprosthetic osteolysis (PPOL) pre-dates aseptic loosening in many cases, indicating the clinical significance of this pathogenic mechanism. A variety of implant-, surgery- and host-related factors have been delineated to explain the development of PPOL. These factors influence the development of PPOL because of changes in mechanical stresses within the vicinity of the prosthetic device, excessive wear of the polyethylene liner, and joint fluid pressure and flow acting on the peri-implant bone. The process of aseptic loosening is initially governed by factors such as implant/limb alignment, device fixation quality and muscle coordination/strength. Later, large numbers of wear particles detached from TKA trigger and perpetuate particle disease, as highlighted by progressive growth of inflammatory/granulomatous tissue around the joint cavity. An increased accumulation of osteoclasts at the bone-implant interface, impairment of osteoblast function, mechanical stresses and increased production of joint fluid contribute to bone resorption and subsequent loosening of the implant. In addition, hypersensitivity and adverse reactions to metal debris may contribute to aseptic TKA failure, but should be determined more precisely. Patient activity level appears to be the most important factor when the long-term development of PPOL is considered. Surgical technique, implant design and material factors are the most important preventative factors, because they influence both the generation of wear debris and excessive mechanical stresses. New generations of bearing surfaces and designs for TKA should carefully address these important issues in extensive preclinical studies. Currently, there is little evidence that PPOL can be prevented by pharmacological intervention.

Third-body abrasive wear of tibial polyethylene inserts combined with metallic and ceramic femoral components in a knee simulator study

AIM

Total knee arthroplasties have reached a high grade of quality and safety, but most often fail because of aseptic implant loosening caused by polyethylene wear debris. Wear is generated at the articulating surfaces, e.g. caused by third-body particles. The objective of this experimental study was to determine the wear of tibial polyethylene inserts combined with metallic and ceramic femoral components under third-body wear conditions initiated by bone cement particles.


METHODS AND MATERIALS

Wear testing using a cemented unconstrained bicondylar knee endoprosthesis (Multigen Plus CR knee system) was performed in a knee wear simulator. Tibial polyethylene inserts were combined with the identical femoral component design, but made of two different materials (cobalt-chromium and ceramic). Bone cement debris including zirconium oxide particles was added every 500,000 cycles between the articulating surfaces. After 5 million load cycles, the amount of wear was determined gravimetrically and compared with results from standard wear test conditions. The surfaces of tibial inserts were also analyzed.


RESULTS

The average gravimetrical wear of the tibial polyethylene inserts in combination with 
cobalt-chromium and ceramic femoral components under third-body wear conditions amounted to 31.88 ± 4.53 mg and 13.06 ± 1.88 mg after 5 million cycles, respectively, and was higher than under standard wear test conditions in both cases.


CONCLUSIONS

The wear simulator test demonstrates that wear of polyethylene inserts under third-body wear conditions, in combination with ceramic femoral components, was significantly lower than with metallic femoral components.

Metal sensitivity after TKA presenting with systemic dermatitis and hair loss

Recent problems with metal-on-metal bearings in total hip arthroplasty have highlighted a connection between metal particles and allergic responses. Metal sensitivity associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is less understood and poorly characterized. However, metal sensitivity can lead to TKA failure. Accurate and reliable testing for this phenomenon is elusive; therefore, the diagnosis of metal sensitivity remains one of exclusion. Only skin testing and lymphocyte transformation testing are commonly available to assess hypersensitivity, and neither test is reliable.This article describes a woman who presented with severe whole-body dermatitis and hair loss. After prolonged pain and progressive stiffness, including failed manipulation while under anesthesia and open synovectomy, the patient had a positive skin test, but the lymphocyte transformation test was negative. She was treated for metal sensitivity with TKA revision to nonallergenic components, and all symptoms resolved. One year after revision, she had good range of motion, complete dermatitis resolution, and hair loss restoration.To the authors' knowledge, this is the only report that describes hair loss as a symptom of metal sensitivity secondary to TKA and hair regrowth after revision. The authors now include metal sensitivity in a differential of causes of pain and other unusual symptoms after TKA that are otherwise unexplained.

Severe persistent synovitis after cobalt-chromium total knee arthroplasty requiring revision

Implant-related hypersensitivity is a well-established cause of failure after total hip arthroplasty but is a rare complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It remains a relatively unpredictable and poorly understood cause of implant-related failure. This article describes 5 patients (6 knees) who presented with persistent pain and hypertrophic synovitis after TKA using a cobalt-chromium component. Extensive perioperative workup, including white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, joint aspiration, and intraoperative cultures, ruled out infection as a cause of the symptoms. All knees demonstrated appropriate ligamentous balance and were well aligned, with all components noted to be well fixed at revision. In all patients, the clinical condition improved dramatically after revision to zirconium femoral and titanium metal-backed tibial components. Pain and functional outcome scores improved in all patients. Intraoperative histopathology revealed a thickened synovium with either a predominantly lymphocytic or histiocytic monocellular response. Final pathology confirmed that no infection was present in any patient. The goal of TKA is to produce a well-performing, pain-free joint. When patients present with recurrent pain and synovitis after TKA, infection must be excluded. When infection and instability have been excluded, metal hypersensitivity should be considered as a cause of primary TKA failure. In these patients, revision to a zirconium femoral component can provide predictable and effective clinical improvement.

No allergic reaction after TKA in a chrome-cobalt-nickel-sensitive patient: case report and review of the literature

Hypersensitivity to metallic implants remains relatively unpredictable and poorly understood. Although 20-25 % of total joint arthroplasty patients develop metal sensitivity, only a few highly susceptible persons (<1 %) exhibit symptoms. We present a case report of a fifty-two-year-old woman with a preoperatively documented metal allergy who underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty using a titanium-niobium-coated implant on one side and a chrome-cobalt implant on the other side because of a logistics problem. At 2-year follow-up, no clinical symptoms of allergy or loosening of the implant were observed. Level of evidence IV.

Influence of the distal femoral resection angle on the principal stresses in ceramic total knee components

PURPOSE

A certain failure mode using a newly developed cemented ceramic femoral component in total knee replacement was observed in clinical application, i.e. fracture of the femoral component during intraoperative impaction. This may be caused by unintentional deflection of the saw blades during cutting with consecutive higher resection angle of the distal femur than desired, leading to bending of the femoral component during implantation. A finite-element-analysis was carried out to simulate implantation of the femoral component and to evaluate the influence of distal femur preparation on implant stress.

SCOPE

We developed and validated a numerical model of the ceramic femoral component including a contact formulation which allowed calculating the principal stresses of the implant during implantation onto the resected femur. The analysis considered different anterior and posterior resection angles with a total of 17 variations. By increasing the femoral resection angle in the finite-element-model it could be shown that a deviation of three degrees from the intended resection angle can cause critical stress amounts during implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

When implanting the ceramic component in total knee arthroplasty, the femoral resection angles should be prepared very precisely, in particular anterior saw blade deflection has to be avoided. The implant manufacturer increased implant safety through an additional resection template. Moreover, the impaction of the ceramic femoral component during cementing was not further recommended by using a hammer.