1
|
Tschiderer L, Innerhofer H, Seekircher L, Waltle L, Richter L, Kimpel J, Lass-Flörl C, Forer L, Schönherr S, Larsen DA, Krammer F, Embacher-Aichhorn S, Tilg H, Weiss G, Allerberger F, Willeit P. Long-term effectiveness of an ultra-rapid rollout vaccination campaign with BNT162b2 on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. iScience 2024; 27:111117. [PMID: 39555399 PMCID: PMC11567098 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
In 2021, an ultra-rapid rollout vaccination campaign in the Schwaz district, Tyrol, Austria, delivered the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 to 66.9% of eligible residents (dose 1: March 11-16, dose 2: April 8-13). Alongside the campaign, we recruited 11,955 residents into the prospective study REDUCE, of whom 3,859 participated in a booster vaccination initiative (November 20-28, 2021). Over a 24-month follow-up, 1,672 participants had incident RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2. Compared to other Tyrolean districts, effectiveness in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection at months 1-9 versus months 10-24 was 81.6% (95% CI 80.0-83.2%; hazard ratio 0.18 [0.17-0.20]) versus 38.2% (35.8-40.6%; 0.62 [0.59-0.64]) among REDUCE participants, and 22.5% (20.5-24.4%; 0.78 [0.76-0.80]) versus 17.0% (16.2-17.8%; 0.83 [0.82-0.84]) in the entire Schwaz district, with substantial variability during follow-up. By March 2023, 61% of Schwaz residents had received booster vaccination versus 55% in other Tyrolean districts. Consequently, vaccinating individuals at high pace effectively reduced SARS-CoV-2 infections and achieved higher vaccination coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Tschiderer
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hanna Innerhofer
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lisa Seekircher
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lisa Waltle
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lukas Richter
- Institute of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, 1220 Vienna, Austria
| | - Janine Kimpel
- Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Cornelia Lass-Flörl
- Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lukas Forer
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sebastian Schönherr
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - David A. Larsen
- Department of Public Health, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Florian Krammer
- Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness (C-VaRPP), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Ignaz Semmelweis Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Infection Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Herbert Tilg
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Günter Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Diseases, Immunology, Pneumology and Rheumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Franz Allerberger
- Institute of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, 1220 Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Willeit
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Ignaz Semmelweis Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Infection Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Savinkina A, Weinberger DM, Toscano CM, De Oliveira LH. Estimated Deaths Averted in Adults by COVID-19 Vaccination in Select Latin American and Caribbean Countries. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae528. [PMID: 39411224 PMCID: PMC11474601 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 09/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on global health, with millions of lives lost worldwide. Vaccination has emerged as a crucial strategy in mitigating the impact of the disease. This study aims to estimate the number of deaths averted through vaccination in Latin America and the Caribbean region (LAC) during the first year and a half of vaccination rollout (January 2021-May 2022). Methods Publicly available data on COVID-19 deaths and vaccination rates were used to estimate the total number of deaths averted via vaccination in LAC. Using estimates for number of deaths, number of vaccinated, and vaccine effectiveness, a counterfactual estimated number of deaths observed without vaccination was calculated. Vaccine effectiveness estimates were obtained from published studies. The analysis focused on 17 countries in LAC and considered adults aged 18 years and older. Results After accounting for underreporting, the analysis estimated that >1.49 million deaths were caused by COVID-19 in the selected countries during the study period. Without vaccination, the model estimated that between 2.10 and 4.11 million COVID-19 deaths would have occurred. Consequently, vaccination efforts resulted in ∼610 000 to 2.61 million deaths averted. Conclusions This study represents the first large-scale, multicenter estimate of population-level vaccine impact on COVID-19 mortality in LAC. The findings underscore the substantial impact of timely and widespread vaccination in averting COVID-19 deaths. These results provide crucial support for vaccination programs aimed at combating epidemic infectious diseases in the region and future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Savinkina
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Daniel M Weinberger
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Cristiana M Toscano
- Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, GO, Brazil
| | - Lucia H De Oliveira
- Independent Consultant, working at Comprehensive Immunization Program, Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) when the project was conceived
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Razimoghadam M, Daroudi R, Yaseri M. The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing hospitalisation and mortality: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Iran. J Glob Health 2024; 14:05026. [PMID: 39325919 PMCID: PMC11426934 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.05026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to a global health crisis, prompting widespread vaccination efforts to reduce severe outcomes. In this study, we assessed the impact of mass COVID-19 vaccination on hospitalisation and mortality rates in Iran, where over 83% of the vaccinated population received inactivated virus vaccines. Methods Using retrospective, cross-sectional analysis, we examined data from the Iran Health Insurance Organisation, covering 41 million individuals from 20 February 2020 to 20 March 2022. We analysed hospital records from 956 Iranian hospitals, focusing on inpatient stays, short-term hospitalisations, and emergency department visits. Study outcomes included COVID-19 hospital admissions and associated mortality. We used negative binomial regression to compare hospital admission rates between periods, while we used a poison regression model with a log link to assess mortality risks before and after vaccination. Results Among 806 076 hospital admissions, 57 599 deaths were recorded. COVID-19 hospitalisations increased with age, and women had slightly higher admission rates than men. Advanced age and male sex correlated with higher mortality rates. Hospital admissions rose to 1178.66 per million population per month post-vaccination compared to 459.78 pre-vaccination. The incidence rate ratio was 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.90-2.32, P < 0.001), mainly due to the Delta variant. In contrast, post-vaccination mortality rates decreased from 111.33 to 51.66 per 1000 admissions per month. Post-vaccination, COVID-19 mortality significantly decreased, with a relative risk being 0.61 (95% CI = 0.60-0.62, P < 0.001) across all age groups and sexes. Conclusions The Delta variant increased hospital admissions among vaccinated individuals, but widespread vaccination significantly reduced COVID-19-related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahya Razimoghadam
- Department of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Rajabali Daroudi
- Department of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- National Center for Health Insurance Research, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehdi Yaseri
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Estadilla CDS, Mar J, Ibarrondo O, Stollenwerk N, Aguiar M. Impact of High Covid-19 Vaccination Rate in an Aging Population: Estimating Averted Hospitalizations and Deaths in the Basque Country, Spain Using Counterfactual Modeling. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2024; 14:1289-1299. [PMID: 39186212 PMCID: PMC11442822 DOI: 10.1007/s44197-024-00286-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccines have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing severe symptoms and fatalities, although their effectiveness in preventing transmission varies depending on the population's age profile and the dominant variant. This study evaluates the impact of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the Basque Country region of Spain, which has the fourth highest proportion of elderly individuals worldwide. Using epidemiological data on hospitalizations, ICU admissions, fatalities, and vaccination coverage, we calibrated four versions of an ordinary differential equations model with varying assumptions on the age structure and transmission function. Counterfactual no-vaccine scenarios were simulated by setting the vaccination rate to zero while all other parameters were held constant. The initial vaccination rollout is estimated to have prevented 46,000 to 75,000 hospitalizations, 6,000 to 11,000 ICU admissions, and 15,000 to 24,000 deaths, reducing these outcomes by 73-86%. The most significant impact occurred during the third quarter of 2021, coinciding with the Delta variant's dominance and a vaccination rate exceeding 60%. Sensitivity analysis revealed that vaccination coverage had a more substantial effect on averted outcomes than vaccine efficacy. Overall, the vaccination campaign in the Basque Country significantly reduced severe COVID-19 outcomes, aligning with global estimates and demonstrating robustness across different modeling approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Delfin S Estadilla
- BCAM-Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Alameda Mazarredo 14, Bilbao, Basque Country, 48009, Spain
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Javier Mar
- Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Guipúzcoa, Basque Country, Spain
- Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Guipúzcoa, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Oliver Ibarrondo
- Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Guipúzcoa, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Nico Stollenwerk
- BCAM-Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Alameda Mazarredo 14, Bilbao, Basque Country, 48009, Spain
| | - Maíra Aguiar
- BCAM-Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Alameda Mazarredo 14, Bilbao, Basque Country, 48009, Spain.
- Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Orellana JDY, Leventhal DGP, Flores-Quispe MDP, Marrero L, Jacques N, Morón-Duarte LS, Boschi-Pinto C. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on excess maternal deaths in Brazil: A two-year assessment. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298822. [PMID: 38564620 PMCID: PMC10986939 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate estimates of the COVID-19 pandemic's indirect impacts are crucial, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to update estimates of excess maternal deaths in Brazil during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS This was an exploratory mixed ecological study using the counterfactual approach. The observed maternal deaths were gathered from the Mortality Information System (SIM) for the period between March 2015 and February 2022. Expected deaths from March 2020 to February 2022 were estimated using quasipoisson generalized additive models, considering quadrimester, age group, and their interaction as predictor variables. Analyses were performed in R version 4.1.2, RStudio, version 2023.03.1+446 and carried out with support from the "mgcv" and "plot_model" libraries. RESULTS A total of 5,040 maternal deaths were reported, with varying excess mortality across regions and age groups, resulting in 69% excess maternal mortality throughout Brazil during the first two years of the pandemic. The Southeast region had 50% excess mortality throughout the first two years and 76% excess in the second year. The North region had 69% excess mortality, increasing in the second year, particularly among women aged 20-34. The Northeast region showed 80% excess mortality, with a significant increase in the second year, especially among women aged 35-49. The Central-West region had 75% excess mortality, higher in the second year and statistically significant among women aged 35-49. The South region showed 117% excess mortality, reaching 203% in the second year among women aged 20-34, but no excess mortality in the 10-19 age category. CONCLUSIONS Over two years, Brazil saw a significant impact on maternal excess deaths, regardless of region and pandemic year. The highest peak occurred between March and June 2021, emphasizing the importance of timely and effective epidemic responses to prevent avoidable deaths and prepare for new crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - María del Pilar Flores-Quispe
- Center for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Lihsieh Marrero
- Department of Nursing, Amazonas State University, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
| | - Nadège Jacques
- Center for Haitian Studies, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Lina Sofía Morón-Duarte
- Global Institute of Clinical Excellence, Keralty, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia
- Translational Research Group, Sanitas University Foundation, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia
| | - Cynthia Boschi-Pinto
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Postgraduate Program in Collective Health, Institute of Collective Health, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Orellana JDY, de Souza MLP, Horta BL. Excess suicides in Brazil during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: Gender, regional and age group inequalities. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2024; 70:99-112. [PMID: 37753792 DOI: 10.1177/00207640231196743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the COVID-19 pandemic's total impact on global mortality is uncertain, an estimated 15 million excess deaths occurred during the first two pandemic years, suggesting that a broad impact, since several causes of death showed a substantial rise. AIMS To estimate excess suicides in Brazil and evaluate differences within and between subgroups during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD Based on suicide data from the mortality information system of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the expected number of suicides was estimated by age group, gender, 4-month periods and regions through quasi-Poisson generalized additive models. Analyses were performed in R software and RStudio. RESULTS Between March 2020 and February 2022, 29,295 suicides were reported in Brazil, close to what would be expected (30,116; 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): [28,009, 32,224]), albeit in males and females aged 30 to 59 years and 60 years and over, there were excess suicides in at least one of the six 4-month periods evaluated, especially in the second pandemic year. In the Southeast region, a 28% increase was observed in women 60 years and older during the second year. In the North region, suicide increased 23% and 32% among women aged 30 to 59 years during the first and second pandemic years, respectively. The Northeast region had a 16% excess in suicides among men aged 30 to 59 years and 61% among women 60 years old and older during the second pandemic year, reaching 83% in July to October 2021. CONCLUSIONS During the first 2 pandemic years, the pattern of suicides was not homogeneous in Brazil. There were substantial excess suicides in women aged 30 to 59 years from the North and Northeast, while among the elderly and men there was a consistent pattern in several four-month periods throughout Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bernardo Lessa Horta
- Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li SL, Prete CA, Zarebski AE, de Souza Santos AA, Sabino EC, Nascimento VH, Wu CH, Messina JP. The Brazilian COVID-19 vaccination campaign: a modelling analysis of sociodemographic factors on uptake. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076354. [PMID: 38233051 PMCID: PMC10806735 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dose shortages delayed access to COVID-19 vaccination. We aim to characterise inequality in two-dose vaccination by sociodemographic group across Brazil. DESIGN This is a cross-sectional study. SETTING We used data retrieved from the Brazilian Ministry of Health databases published between 17 January 2021 and 6 September 2021. METHODS We assessed geographical inequalities in full vaccination coverage and dose by age, sex, race and socioeconomic status. We developed a Campaign Optimality Index to characterise inequality in vaccination access due to premature vaccination towards younger populations before older and vulnerable populations were fully vaccinated. Generalised linear regression was used to investigate the risk of death and hospitalisation by age group, socioeconomic status and vaccination coverage. RESULTS Vaccination coverage is higher in the wealthier South and Southeast. Men, people of colour and low-income groups were more likely to be only partially vaccinated due to missing or delaying a second dose. Vaccination started prematurely for age groups under 50 years which may have hindered uptake in older age groups. Vaccination coverage was associated with a lower risk of death, especially in older age groups (ORs 9.7 to 29.0, 95% CI 9. 4 to 29.9). Risk of hospitalisation was greater in areas with higher vaccination rates due to higher access to care and reporting. CONCLUSIONS Vaccination inequality persists between states, age and demographic groups despite increasing uptake. The association between hospitalisation rates and vaccination is attributed to preferential delivery to areas of greater transmission and access to healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina L Li
- School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carlos A Prete
- Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexander E Zarebski
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andreza Aruska de Souza Santos
- Oxford School of Global and Area Studies and Latin American Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- King's Brazil Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ester C Sabino
- Departamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias & Instituto de Medicina Tropical da Faculdade de Medicina, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vitor H Nascimento
- Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Chieh-Hsi Wu
- School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southhampton, Southhampton, UK
| | - Jane P Messina
- School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford School of Global and Area Studies, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Galvão-Lima LJ, de Medeiros Júnior NF, Jesus GS, Morais AH, Caldeira-Silva GJ, Queiroz dos Santos JP, Rocha M, Marques dos Santos M, Freire PA, Silva RD, Gouvea MDPG, Neto LFP, Domingues CMAS, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Martins-Filho OA, Valim V, Valentim RA. Half dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine was equivalent to full doses to reduce moderate and severe COVID-19 cases. IJID REGIONS 2023; 9:88-94. [PMID: 37953882 PMCID: PMC10637913 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Previously, we presented the effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 half-dose (HD) immunization for preventing new COVID-19 cases. Here, we evaluated the administration of an HD of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in the primary immunization protocol (up to two doses) in reducing moderate and severe cases, hospitalizations, and deaths when compared to the administration of full doses (FD) after a long-term follow-up. Methods We evaluated data from 29,469 participants between January 2021 and November 2022 who received an HD or FD vaccine and crossed this information with their medical records to identify those who developed moderate or severe cases. All participants were classified into four groups according to their immunization status and followed 500 days after the last vaccine administration. Results The propensity-score matching analysis indicates that the administration of the two HDs of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was equivalent to the use of two FDs to reduce moderate and severe COVID-19 cases. The relative risk of being infected and developing moderate or severe conditions after the administration of at least one HD or FD was similar 150 or 500 days after the administration of the immunizers. Conclusion Administering two HDs can be used safely as a cost-effective alternative to the primary immunization protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo J. Galvão-Lima
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | | | - Galileu S. Jesus
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Antônio H.F. Morais
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
- Advanced Nucleus of Technological Innovation (NAVI), Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Norte (IFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Gleyson J.P. Caldeira-Silva
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - João Paulo Queiroz dos Santos
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
- Advanced Nucleus of Technological Innovation (NAVI), Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Norte (IFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Marcella Rocha
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Marquiony Marques dos Santos
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Pierre A. Freire
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo D. Silva
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Maria da Penha Gomes Gouvea
- Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Coletiva (PPGSC), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
- Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio Moraes (HUCAM/UFES), Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares (EBSERH), Vitória/ES, Brazil
| | | | | | - Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho
- Grupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ-Minas), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Olindo Assis Martins-Filho
- Grupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ-Minas), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Valéria Valim
- Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Coletiva (PPGSC), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
- Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio Moraes (HUCAM/UFES), Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares (EBSERH), Vitória/ES, Brazil
| | - Ricardo A.M. Valentim
- Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ghafari M, Hosseinpour S, Rezaee-Zavareh MS, Dascalu S, Rostamian S, Aramesh K, Madani K, Kordasti S. A quantitative evaluation of the impact of vaccine roll-out rate and coverage on reducing deaths: insights from the first 2 years of COVID-19 epidemic in Iran. BMC Med 2023; 21:429. [PMID: 37953291 PMCID: PMC10642021 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03127-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination has played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of COVID-19. Despite numerous studies highlighting its benefits in reducing the risk of severe disease and death, we still lack a quantitative understanding of how varying vaccination roll-out rates influence COVID-19 mortality. METHODS We developed a framework for estimating the number of avertable COVID-19 deaths (ACDs) by vaccination in Iran. To achieve this, we compared Iran's vaccination roll-out rates with those of eight model countries that predominantly used inactivated virus vaccines. We calculated net differences in the number of fully vaccinated individuals under counterfactual scenarios where Iran's per-capita roll-out rate was replaced with that of the model countries. This, in turn, enabled us to determine age specific ACDs for the Iranian population under counterfactual scenarios where number of COVID-19 deaths are estimated using all-cause mortality data. These estimates covered the period from the start of 2020 to 20 April 2022. RESULTS We found that while Iran would have had an approximately similar number of fully vaccinated individuals under counterfactual roll-out rates based on Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Turkey (~ 65-70%), adopting Turkey's roll-out rates could have averted 50,000 (95% confidence interval: 38,100-53,500) additional deaths, while following Bangladesh's rates may have resulted in 52,800 (17,400-189,500) more fatalities in Iran. Surprisingly, mimicking Argentina's slower roll-out led to only 12,600 (10,400-13,300) fewer deaths, despite a higher counterfactual percentage of fully vaccinated individuals (~ 79%). Emulating Montenegro or Bolivia, with faster per capita roll-out rates and approximately 50% counterfactual full vaccination, could have prevented more deaths in older age groups, especially during the early waves. Finally, replicating Bahrain's model as an upper-bound benchmark, Iran could have averted 75,300 (56,000-83,000) deaths, primarily in the > 50 age groups. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis revealed that faster roll-outs were consistently associated with higher numbers of averted deaths, even in scenarios with lower overall coverage. This study offers valuable insights into future decision-making regarding infectious disease epidemic management through vaccination strategies. It accomplishes this by comparing various countries' relative performance in terms of timing, pace, and vaccination coverage, ultimately contributing to the prevention of COVID-19-related deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahan Ghafari
- Big Data Institute and Pandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Sepanta Hosseinpour
- School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
| | | | | | - Somayeh Rostamian
- Department of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kiarash Aramesh
- The James F. Drane Bioethics Institute, PennWest University, Edinboro, PA, USA
| | - Kaveh Madani
- United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH), Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Shahram Kordasti
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aragão DP, Junior AGDS, Mondini A, Distante C, Gonçalves LMG. COVID-19 Patterns in Araraquara, Brazil: A Multimodal Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:4740. [PMID: 36981646 PMCID: PMC10048455 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20064740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The epidemiology of COVID-19 presented major shifts during the pandemic period. Factors such as the most common symptoms and severity of infection, the circulation of different variants, the preparedness of health services, and control efforts based on pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions played important roles in the disease incidence. The constant evolution and changes require the continuous mapping and assessing of epidemiological features based on time-series forecasting. Nonetheless, it is necessary to identify the events, patterns, and actions that were potential factors that affected daily COVID-19 cases. In this work, we analyzed several databases, including information on social mobility, epidemiological reports, and mass population testing, to identify patterns of reported cases and events that may indicate changes in COVID-19 behavior in the city of Araraquara, Brazil. In our analysis, we used a mathematical approach with the fast Fourier transform (FFT) to map possible events and machine learning model approaches such as Seasonal Auto-regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and neural networks (NNs) for data interpretation and temporal prospecting. Our results showed a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of about 5 (more precisely, a 4.55 error over 71 cases for 20 March 2021 and a 5.57 error over 106 cases for 3 June 2021). These results demonstrated that FFT is a useful tool for supporting the development of the best prevention and control measures for COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dunfrey Pires Aragão
- Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica e de Computação, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Salgado Filho, 3000, Lagoa Nova, Natal 59078-970, Brazil
- Institute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems-CNR, Via Monteroni sn, 73100 Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Adriano Mondini
- Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú, Km 1, Campus Ville, Araraquara 14800-903, Brazil
| | - Cosimo Distante
- Institute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems-CNR, Via Monteroni sn, 73100 Lecce, Italy
| | - Luiz Marcos Garcia Gonçalves
- Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica e de Computação, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Salgado Filho, 3000, Lagoa Nova, Natal 59078-970, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gray J, AlAnazi AA, AlSumait F, Abu-Shaheen A, Bashir MS, Al Sheef M. What motivated residents of Saudi Arabia to receive the COVID-19 vaccine? Front Public Health 2023; 11:1065157. [PMID: 36825136 PMCID: PMC9941561 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1065157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acceptance of vaccination is a multifactorial issue. The unprecedented speed at which the COVID-19 disease spread globally has meant that people have had to face the idea of receiving novel vaccines for a novel disease. Purpose Studies conducted earlier in the pandemic had shown high vaccine hesitancy in Saudi Arabia, therefore we wanted to understand the motivating factors for people living in Saudi Arabia with regards to accepting the COVID-19 vaccine, our survey was conducted when the government had already mandated vaccination to enter public spaces. Saudi society is not particularly outspoken and therefore it was of special importance to the authors to explore the motivation behind COVID-19 vaccines. Methods This is a cross-sectional survey of 802 participants living in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was distributed to staff, visitors, and patients in a hospital in Saudi Arabia and via electronic means to the general population. Results A total of 521 (65%) of the respondents were women, and 281 (35%) were men. A total of 710 (88.5%) were Saudi, and 55 (6.9%) were non-Saudi. The majority of participants (496, 65.7%) stated that they registered for the vaccine as soon as it was available, with 185 (24.5%) stating that they registered when they were mandated to do so and 74 (9.8%) registered only when they felt cases were increasing. Most participants (316, 41%) stated that the main reason for taking the vaccine was one of a self-protective nature, followed by indirect vaccination (240, 31.1%), paternalistic reasons (157, 20.4%) and altruistic reasons (58, 7.5%). Conclusions With the increased burden on healthcare that is being faced by COVID-19, other resources need to be carefully allocated. This paper may aid the Saudi government in understanding the motivation for the population to take the vaccine and therefore facilitate any future vaccination campaigns to ensure the best utilization of resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Gray
- Dentistry Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,*Correspondence: Jenny Gray ✉
| | - Ahmed AlHumaidi AlAnazi
- Department of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahad AlSumait
- Department of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amani Abu-Shaheen
- Research Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad Salman Bashir
- Department of Biostatistics, Research Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Al Sheef
- Department of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|