Comparative sensitivity and inhibitor tolerance of GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification and Investigator® 24plex QS kits for challenging samples

Development of a novel five dye insertion/deletion (INDEL) panel for ancestry determination

The use of genetic markers, specifically Short Tandem Repeats (STRs), has been a valuable tool for identifying persons of interest. However, the ability to analyze additional markers including Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Insertion/Deletion (INDELs) polymorphisms allows laboratories to explore other investigative leads. INDELs were chosen in this study because large panels can be differentiated by size, allowing them to be genotyped by capillary electrophoresis. Moreover, these markers do not produce stutter and are smaller in size than STRs, facilitating the recovery of genetic information from degraded samples. The INDEL Ancestry Informative Markers (AIMs) in this study were selected from the 1000 Genomes Project based on a fixation index (FST) greater than 0.50, high allele frequency divergence, and genetic distance. A total of 25 INDEL-AIMs were optimized and validated according to SWGDAM guidelines in a five-dye multiplex. To validate the panel, genotyping was performed on 155 unrelated individuals from four ancestral groups (Caucasian, African, Hispanic, and East Asian). Bayesian clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed revealing clear separation among three groups, with some observed overlap within the Hispanic group. Additionally, the PCA results were compared against a training set of 793 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project, demonstrating consistent results. Validation studies showed the assay to be reproducible, tolerant to common inhibitors, robust with challenging casework type samples, and sensitive down to 125 pg. In conclusion, our results demonstrated the robustness and effectiveness of a 25 loci INDEL system for ancestry inference of four ancestries commonly found in the United States.

An exploratory view into allelic drop-out of sequenced autosomal STRs

As massively parallel sequencing is implemented in forensic genetics, an understanding of sequence data must accompany these advancements, that is, accurate modeling of data for proper statistical analysis. Allelic drop-out, a common stochastic effect seen in genetic data, is often modeled in statistical analysis of STR results. This proof-of-concept study sequenced several serial dilutions of a standard sample ranging from 4 ng to 7.82 pg to evaluate allelic drop-out trends on a select panel of autosomal STRs using the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit, Primer Set A on the Illumina MiSeq FGx. Parameters assessed included locus, profile, and run specific information. A majority of the allelic drop-out occurred in DNA concentrations less than 31.25 pg. Statistical results indicated a need for locus-specific modeling based on STR descriptors, like simple versus compound repeat patterns. No correlation was seen between average read count of scored alleles and allelic drop-out at a locus. A statistical correlation was observed between the amount of allelic drop-out and the starting amount of DNA in a sample, average read count of a sample, and total read count generated on a flow cell. This study supports using common allelic drop-out factors used in fragment length analysis on sequenced STRs while including additional locus, sample, and run specific information. Results demonstrate multiple factors that can be considered when developing probability of allelic drop-out models for sequenced autosomal STRs including locus-specific analysis, total read count of a profile, and total read count sequenced on a flow cell.

Development of a novel five-dye panel for human identification insertion/deletion (INDEL) polymorphisms

DNA analysis of forensic case samples relies on short tandem repeats (STRs), a key component of the combined DNA index system (CODIS) used to identify individuals. However, limitations arise when dealing with challenging samples, prompting the exploration of alternative markers such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion/deletion (INDELs) polymorphisms. Unlike SNPs, INDELs can be differentiated easily by size, making them compatible with electrophoresis methods. It is possible to design small INDEL amplicons (<200 bp) to enhance recovery from degraded samples. To this end, a set of INDEL Human Identification Markers (HID) was curated from the 1000 Genomes Project, employing criteria including a fixation index (FST) ≤ 0.06, minor allele frequency (MAF) >0.2, and high allele frequency divergence. A panel of 33 INDEL-HIDs was optimized and validated following the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM) guidelines, utilizing a five-dye multiplex electrophoresis system. A small sample set (n = 79 unrelated individuals) was genotyped to assess the assay's performance. The validation studies exhibited reproducibility, inhibition tolerance, ability to detect a two-person mixture from a 4:1 to 1:6 ratio, robustness with challenging samples, and sensitivity down to 125 pg of DNA. In summary, the 33-loci INDEL-HID panel exhibited robust recovery with low-template and degraded samples and proved effective for individualization within a small sample set.

A comparison of six adhesive tapes as tape lifts for efficient trace DNA recovery without the transfer of PCR inhibitors

Tape-lifting is a non-destructive method employed in the laboratory to recover and collect trace DNA evidence from crime scene exhibits with porous surfaces. The success of tape-lifting is a balance between capturing the biological material and compatibility with downstream DNA extraction processes to ensure efficient release of the tape-lifted material during DNA extraction. In this study, six commercially available low-, regular- and high-tack adhesive tapes were evaluated. The low-tack S183 tape and the highly adhesive S-Hold tape were compared for DNA recovery efficiency from different materials commonly encountered in casework. All tape-lifts were processed using PrepFiler Express™ BTA and AutoMate Express™ Forensic DNA extraction systems, DNA samples quantitated by Quantifiler TRIO, amplified using Powerplex® 21 and VeriFiler™ PLUS (VFP), and analysed on a 3500xl genetic analyser to evaluate the quality of the resultant STR profiles obtained. The more adhesive S-Hold tape recovered comparable or more DNA than the low-tack S183 tape from the majority of materials tested. However, STR profiles obtained from S183 tape-lifts were of markedly higher quality compared to S-Hold tape-lifts. This was most evident for towel, denim and printed chiffon, where S-Hold samples exhibited severe PCR inhibition, with VFP internal quality markers confirming the presence of inhibitors. The findings suggest that strong adhesion is not necessarily beneficial for tape-lifting, as the low tack S183 tape was able to efficiently recover cellular material from the surface of porous substrates commonly encountered in casework, while avoiding the co-transfer of PCR-inhibitory substances from the sampled material.

Developmental validation of a custom-designed Multi-InDel panel: A five-dye multiplex amplification system for challenging DNA samples

The continual investigation of novel genetic markers has yielded promising solutions for addressing the challenges encountered in forensic DNA analysis. In this study, we have introduced a custom-designed panel capable of simultaneously amplifying 41 novel Multi-insertion/deletion (Multi-InDel) markers and an amelogenin locus using the capillary electrophoresis platform. Through a developmental validation study conducted in accordance with guidelines recommended by the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods, we demonstrated that the new Multi-InDel system exhibited the sensitivity to produce reliable genotyping profiles with as little as 62.5 pg of template DNA. Accurate and complete genotyping profiles could be obtained even in the presence of specific concentrations of PCR inhibitors. Furthermore, the maximum amplicon size for this system was limited to under 220 bp in the genotyping profile, resulting in its superior efficiency compared to commercially available short tandem repeat kits for both naturally and artificially degraded samples. In the context of mixed DNA analysis, the Multi-InDel system was proved informative in the identification of two-person DNA mixture, even when the template DNA of the minor contributor was as low as 50 pg. In conclusion, a series of performance evaluation studies have provided compelling evidence that the new Multi-InDel system holds promise as a valuable tool for forensic DNA analysis.

Performance comparison of four qPCR and three autosomal STR commercial kits from degraded skeletal remains

This research evaluates the current DNA quantification (Quantifiler™ Trio, PowerQuant®, Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro and InnoQuant® HY Fast) and autosomal STRs amplification kits (GlobalFiler™, PowerPlex® Fusion 6 C, Investigator® 24Plex QS) using 62 degraded skeletal remains from armed conflicts (petrous bone, femur, tibia, and tooth) with several parameters (autosomal small, large, and male target, degradation index, probability of degradation, number of alleles above analytical threshold, number of alleles above stochastic threshold, RFU, peak height ratio, number of reportable loci). The best qPCR/autosomal STRs amplification tandem was determined by comparing quantification results by a DNA quantity estimation based on sample average RFU. InnoQuant® HY Fast was the most sensitive kit, and no significative differences were observed among amplification kits; however, Investigator® 24 Plex QS was found to be the most sensitive in our samples. That is why InnoQuant™ and Investigator® 24Plex QS were determined to be the best tandem.

Recommendations for the successful identification of altered human remains using standard and emerging technologies: Results of a systematic approach

Successful DNA-based identification of altered human remains relies on the condition of the corpses and varies between tissue types. Therefore, the aim of this prospective multicenter study was to generate evidence-based recommendations for the successful identification of altered remains. For this, 19 commonly used soft and hard tissues from 102 altered human bodies were investigated. The corpses' condition was categorized into three anatomical regions using a practical scoring system. Besides other data, DNA yields, degradation indices, and short tandem repeat (STR) profile completeness were determined in 949 tissue samples. Additionally, varying degrees of alteration and tissue-specific differences were evaluated using the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platform MiSeq FGx™. Selected challenging samples were sequenced in parallel with the Ion S5™ platform to assess platform-specific performances in the prediction of the deceased's phenotype and the biogeographic ancestry. Differences between tissue types and DNA extraction methods were found, revealing, for example, the lowest degradation for vertebral disc samples from corpses with initiating, advanced and high degrees of decomposition. With respect to STR profile completeness, blood samples outperformed all other tissues including even profoundly degraded corpses. NGS results revealed higher profile completeness compared to standard capillary electrophoresis (CE) genotyping. Per sample, material and degradation degree, a probability for its genotyping success, including the "extended" European Standard Set (eESS) loci, was provided for the forensic community. Based on the observations, recommendations for the alteration-specific optimal tissue types were made to improve the first-attempt identification success of altered human remains for forensic casework.

Development and validation of a new multiplex Y-STR panel designed to increase the power of discrimination

In an attempt to increase the discrimination capacity (DC) and reduce the adventitious match probability, a 6-dye multiplex Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (Y-STR) panel named Y34plex was constructed that combined 25 Y-chromosomal markers (DYS456, DYS627, DYS390, DYS570, DYS635, DYS385a/b, DYS448, DYS437, DYS533, DYS449, DYS481, DYS392, DYS391, DYS389I, DYS460, YGATAH4, DYS438, DYS389II, DYS19, DYS458, DYF387S1a/b, DYS439, DYS393, DYS576, and DYS518) in widely used commercial kits, with nine highly polymorphic Y-STR loci (DYS557, DYS527a/b, DYS593, DYS444, DYS596, DYS643, DYS447, DYS549, and DYS645). The Y34plex is a promising type system to distinguish both unrelated and related male individuals due to the incorporation of rapidly mutated Y-STR loci. A validation study of the Y34plex was performed and followed the guidelines of the Scientific Working Group on DNA analysis methods. Results show that full Y-STR profiles were obtained from male/female DNA mixtures with 125 pg of male DNA in the presence of 50 ng of female DNA. The ability to tolerate polymerase chain reaction inhibitors commonly contained in forensic casework samples demonstrated the applicability and robustness of the Y34plex. Compared with the Yfiler Plus kit, the novel panel showed an increased power of discrimination in Chinese Wuxi Han population (n = 434). The overall haplotype diversity of the Y34plex was 0.999606, whereas DC value was 0.956221, which is suitable for use on forensic paternal investigation.

The performance of quality controls in the Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro RGQ and Investigator® 24plex STR kits with a variety of forensic samples

Forensic DNA laboratories process database reference samples on FTA® cards or buccal swabs, which commonly contain adequate amounts of quality DNA resulting in full STR profiles and high first-pass rates. However, some reference samples and many forensic casework samples are exposed to a variety of insults that may lead to low quantities of DNA, DNA degradation, DNA mixtures, and/or PCR inhibition, posing a challenge to downstream genotyping success. The inclusion of multiple amplification targets and internal PCR controls (IPCs) in DNA quantification kits, and quality sensors within STR amplification kits can aid in the accurate interpretation of sample/profile quality, and guide more efficient rework strategies when needed. In order to assess the effectiveness of these quality systems we subjected database-type samples (buccal swabs and blood or saliva on FTA® cards), mock casework samples (low-template, degraded, inhibited, DNA mixtures), and authentic post-coital samples to various challenging conditions. Concordance between the quality flags in the Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro RGQ kit (QIAGEN), the QS markers in QIAGEN's Investigator® 24plex QS kit, and overall STR profile quality was evaluated for all casework-type samples. To assess the value of the QS markers in the Investigator® 24plex QS and GO! STR kits, samples with partial or failed STR profiles were reworked based on the quality of the electropherogram first with the QS markers redacted, and second in conjunction with the QS markers. Results from each of the rework approaches were compared to determine which strategy, if any, improved the STR profile quality and the number of reportable alleles. The QS markers in the 24plex STR kits correctly confirmed sample quality in 99.9% of databasing samples and 98% of mock casework samples. Quality flags during DNA quantification were concordant with downstream STR profiles for the majority (77%) of the mock casework samples. Additionally, when samples with partial STR profiles were reworked, more loci were obtained for 80% of the samples regardless of the rework strategy used. However, the most notable improvement in STR completeness was observed in inhibited samples that were reworked based on the information provided by the STR quality sensors, with an average increase of 56% reportable alleles.

Assessment of Diamond™ Nucleic Acid Dye for the identification and targeted sampling of latent DNA in operational casework

Recovery and DNA profiling of latent touch DNA deposits is a ubiquitous practice by operational forensic laboratories that provides critical evidence in many criminal investigations. Despite recent improvements in the sensitivity of contemporary DNA profiling kits, the inability to localise and visually quantify touch DNA deposits on an exhibit means that ineffective or unwarranted sampling is often performed leading to poor success. Diamond™ Nucleic Acid Dye (DD) is a fluorescent DNA binding dye which has recently been shown to bind to corneocytes enabling visualisation and targeted sampling of touch DNA deposits under controlled conditions. The ability to translate these findings to operational casework, where a diverse range of substrates is encountered and the amount and distribution of touch DNA is uncontrolled, is currently unknown. Here, we provide the first report on the use of DD in an operational context. Spraying items with DD was shown to have no impact on downstream immunological testing, DNA extraction, or DNA profiling with the GlobalFiler™ PCR amplification kit. DD was shown to effectively locate areas of touch DNA on select exhibits using the Polilight. Issues with background fluorescence, non-specific staining, interference from fingerprint enhancement reagents, or absorbance of the excitation light by black surfaces demonstrated that DD is not compatible with all exhibits. Background fluorescence also prevented the use of DD to screen for the presence of cellular material on IsoHelix swabs post-sampling but it was suitable for screening Lovell DNA tapelifts. A casework trial of 49 plastic bag and tape exhibits showed limited application of DD to triage out negative items as DNA was recovered from items where DD fluorescence was not detected. Where DD fluorescence was detected, its broad distribution prevented targeted sampling and any correlation to be made between the amount observed and DNA yield or profiling outcome. The DD procedure also increased the time taken to search exhibits and risk of inadvertent contamination. Our study suggests that DD is not suited as a generalised screening technique across all touch casework exhibits but further investigation is warranted to determine its applicability to specific exhibit types.

Developmental validation of the novel six-dye GoldeneyeTM DNA ID System 35InDel kit for forensic application

Insertion/deletion polymorphisms (InDels) have been treated as a prospective and helpful genetic marker in the fields of forensic human identification, anthropology and population genetics for the past few years. In this study, we developed a six-dye multiplex typing system consisting of 34 autosomal InDels and Amelogenin for forensic application. The contained InDels were specifically selected for Chinese population with the MAF ≥ 0.25 in East Asia, which do not overlap with the markers of Investigator^® DIPplex kit. The typing system was named as Goldeneye^TM DNA ID System 35InDel Kit, and a series of developmental validation studies including repeatability/reproducibility, concordance, accuracy, sensitivity, stability, species specificity and population genetics were conducted on this kit. We confirmed that the 35InDel kit is precise, sensitive, species specific and robust for forensic practice. Moreover, the 35InDel kit is capable of typing DNA extracted from forensic routine case-type samples as well as degraded samples and mixture samples. All markers are proved to be highly polymorphic with an average observed heterozygosity (He) of 0.4582. The combined power of discrimination (CPD) is 0.999 999 999 999 978 and the combined power of exclusion in duos (CPE_D) and trios (CPE_T) are 0.978 837 and 0.999573, respectively, which are higher than those of the Investigator^® DIPplex kit. Thus, the Goldeneye^TM DNA ID System 35InDel kit is suitable for forensic human identification and could serve as a supplementary typing system for paternity testing. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1945723 .

Validation of the Investigator 24plex QS Kit: a 6-dye multiplex PCR assay for forensic application in the Chinese Han population

The Investigator 24plex QS Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) is a 6-dye fluorescent chemistry short tandem repeat (STR) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification system that simultaneously amplifies 20 of the expanded Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) core STR loci, SE33, DYS391, and the standard sex-determining locus, amelogenin, as well as two special internal performance quality sensor controls (QS1 and QS2), which are included in the primer mix to check the PCR performance. This study was designed to be a pilot evaluation of this STR-PCR kit in a Chinese Han population regarding the PCR conditions, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, and concordance; tolerance to PCR inhibitors; applicability to real “forensic-type” samples; species specificity; mixture, balance and stutter analyses, and utility in a population investigation. The exhaustive validation studies demonstrated that the Investigator 24plex QS system is accurate, sensitive and robust for STR genotyping. In addition, these genetic markers in the population data in our study indicated that they can also be useful for forensic identification and paternity testing in the Chinese Han population.

Utility of the Ion S5™ and MiSeq FGx™ sequencing platforms to characterize challenging human remains

Often in missing persons' and mass disaster cases, the samples remaining for analysis are hard tissues such as bones, teeth, nails, and hair. These remains may have been exposed to harsh environmental conditions, which pose challenges for downstream genotyping. Short tandem repeat analysis (STR) via capillary electrophoresis (CE) is still the gold standard for DNA typing; however, a newer technology known as massively parallel sequencing (MPS) could improve upon our current techniques by typing different and more markers in a single analysis, and consequently improving the power of discrimination. In this study, bone and tooth samples exposed to a variety of DNA insults (cremation, embalming, decomposition, thermal degradation, and fire) were assessed and sequenced using the Precision ID chemistry and a custom AmpliSeq™ STR and iiSNP panel on the Ion S5™ System, and the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the MiSeq FGx™ system, as well as the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit on the 3500™ Genetic Analyzer. The results demonstrated that using traditional CE-based genotyping performed as expected, producing a partial or full DNA profile for all samples, and that both sequencing chemistries and platforms were able to recover sufficient STR and SNP information from a majority of the same challenging samples. Run metrics including profile completeness and mean read depth produced good results with each system, considering the degree of damage of some samples. Most sample insults (except decomposed) produced similar numbers of alleles for both MPS systems. Comparable markers produced full concordance between the two platforms.

Practical applications of DNA genotyping in diagnostic pathology

INTRODUCTION

Among various human tissue identity testing platforms, short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping has emerged as the most powerful and cost-effective method. Beyond forensic applications, tissue identity testing has become increasingly important in modern medical practice, in areas such as diagnostic pathology. Areas covered: A brief overview of various molecular/genetic techniques for identity testing is provided. This includes restriction fragment length polymorphism, single nucleotide polymorphism array and STR genotyping by multiplex PCR. Diagnostic applications of STR genotyping are covered in greater details: genotyping diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, resolving tissue specimen mislabeling or histologic contaminant or 'floaters', bone marrow engraftment/chimerism analysis and interrogation of the primary source of malignancy in patients receiving organ donation. Four clinical cases are then presented to further illustrate these important clinical applications along with discussion of the interpretation, limitations, and pitfalls of STR genotyping. Expert commentary: STR genotyping is currently the most applicable method of identity testing and has extended its role well into the practice of diagnostic pathology with novel and powerful applications beyond forensics.

Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success

Skeletal remains recovered from missing persons' cases are often exposed to harsh environmental conditions resulting in the DNA being damaged, degraded, and/or the samples containing PCR inhibitors. In this study, the efficacy of common extraction methods was evaluated to remove high levels of PCR inhibitors commonly encountered with human remains, and their downstream compatibility with the two leading sequencing chemistries and platforms for human identification purposes. Blood, hair, and bone samples were spiked with high levels of inhibitors commonly identified in each particular substrate in order to test the efficiency of various DNA extraction methods prior to sequencing. Samples were extracted using three commercial extraction kits (DNA IQ™, DNA Investigator, and PrepFiler® BTA), organic (blood and hair only), and two total demineralization protocols (bone only)). Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) was performed using two different systems: Precision ID chemistry and a custom AmpliSeq™ STR and iiSNP panel on the Ion S5™ System and the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the MiSeq FGx™. The overall results showed that all DNA extraction methods were efficient and are fully compatible with both MPS systems. Key performance indicators such as STR and SNP reportable alleles, read depth, and heterozygote balance were comparable for each extraction method. In samples where CE-based STRs yielded partial profiles (bone), MPS-based STRs generated more complete or full profiles. Moreover, MPS panels contain more STR loci than current CE-based STR kits and also include SNPs, which can further increase the power of discrimination obtained from these samples, making MPS a desirable choice for the forensic analysis of such challenging samples.