Effects of cimetidine-like drugs on recombinant GABAA receptors

Neuropharmacological Assessment of the Hydroethanolic Leaf Extract of Calotropis procera (Ait). R. Br. (Apocynaceae) in Mice

BACKGROUND

Calotropis procera has been widely used traditionally for its analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. It is also reportedly used in ethnomedicine for mental health disorders including epilepsy even in the absence of supporting scientific data. Thus, the potential of the plant to affect neurological functions was evaluated.

METHODS

Irwin's test was performed to determine the effect of the oral administration of the extract (30-3000 mg kg^-1) on gross behaviour and physiological function. The activity meter, rotarod, pentylenetetrazol- (PTZ-) induced convulsion, pentobarbitone-induced sleep test, and the tail immersion tests were used to evaluate the spontaneous activity, neuromuscular function, convulsive threshold, sedation, and analgesic effects of the Calotropis procera extract (30-1000 mg/kg), respectively, in mice.

RESULTS

Calotropis procera extract (CPE) exhibited significant (p < 0.0001) anticonvulsant and analgesic effects. There was a significant increase in withdrawal latency of the CPE-treated animals in the tail immersion test for analgesia (p < 0.0001), while latency and duration of PTZ-induced convulsions were positively modulated. Calotropis procera extract showed significant (p < 0.0001) central nervous system depressant effects in pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis at 100-1000 mg/kg and spontaneous activity test (30-1000 mg/kg). The extract also depicted impaired motor coordination at 100-1000 mg/kg dose levels. LD₅₀ was estimated to be above 1000 mg kg^-1.

CONCLUSIONS

Calotropis procera extract has significant central nervous system depressant and analgesic effects in mice.

The effects of cimetidine chronic treatment on conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 1-day, 7-day and 14-day administrations of cimetidine on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs; valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbital) against maximal electroshock (MES)-induced convulsions in mice.

METHODS

Electroconvulsions were evoked in Albino Swiss mice by a current delivered via ear-clip electrodes. In addition, the effects of cimetidine, AEDs alone and their combinations were studied on performance and long-term memory tests. Pharmacokinetic changes in plasma and brain concentrations of AEDs after cimetidine administration were evaluated with immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Cimetidine (up to 100mg/kg) after 1-day administration did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold in animals. Moreover, in the 14-day treatment, cimetidine administered at a dose of 40mg/kg did not significantly change the electroconvulsive threshold in the MES-test, cimetidine administered 14-day (at 20mg/kg) significantly increased the anticonvulsant activity of carbamazepine, staying without effects after a 1-day and 7-day studies. In contrast, both the 7-day and 14-day administrations of cimetidine resulted in significant reductions of protective efficacy of the phenobarbital. Only valproate and phenytoin were not affected by cimetidine (20mg/kg) in all experimental period. Cimetidine administered 1-day, did not alter total brain concentrations and free plasma levels of all AEDs tested, whilst the 14-day study elevated carbamazepine plasma and brain concentration and reduced phenobarbital brain concentration. Cimetidine co-applied with AEDs did not impair performance of mice evaluated in the chimney test however, it worsened long-term memory in animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this preclinical study, a special caution is advised when treating epileptic patients with combinations of phenobarbital or carbamazepine with cimetidine.

Efficacy of improgan, a non-opioid analgesic, in neuropathic pain

Improgan, a non-opioid analgesic, is known to act in the rodent brain stem to produce highly effective antinociception in several acute pain tests. However, improgan has not been studied in any models of chronic pain. To assess the efficacy of improgan in an animal model of neuropathic pain, the effects of this drug were studied on mechanical allodynia following unilateral spinal nerve ligation (SNL) in rats. Intracerebroventricular (icv) improgan (40-80 μg) produced complete, reversible, dose-dependent attenuation of hind paw mechanical allodynia for up to 1h after administration, with no noticeable behavioral or motor side effects. Intracerebral (ic) microinjections of improgan (5-30 μg) into the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) also reversed the allodynia, showing this brain area to be an important site for improgan's action. The recently-demonstrated suppression of RVM ON-cell activity by improgan may account for the presently-observed anti-allodynic activity. The present findings suggest that brain-penetrating, improgan-like drugs developed for human use could be effective medications for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

The wake-promoting transmitter histamine preferentially enhances α-4 subunit-containing GABAA receptors

Histamine is an important wake-promoting neurotransmitter that activates seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled histamine receptors. However, histamine demonstrates target promiscuity, including direct interaction with the structurally unrelated glutamate (NMDA) and GABA(A) receptor channels. Previous work showed that histamine enhances the activity of recombinant GABA(A) receptor isoforms typically found in synaptic locations, although co-release of histamine and GABA is not known to occur in vivo. Here we used patch clamp recordings of various recombinant GABA(A) receptor isoforms (α1-6, β1-3, γ1-3, δ) to test the hypothesis that histamine might show subunit preference under low GABA concentration (extrasynaptic) conditions. We found that histamine potentiated the whole-cell responses to GABA for all tested subunit combinations. However, the magnitude of enhancement was largest (∼400% of EC(10) GABA-evoked currents) with α4β3 and α4β3X isoforms, where X could be γ or δ. In contrast, histamine (1 mM) had small effects on prolonging deactivation of α4β3γ2 receptors following brief (5 ms) pulses of 1 mM GABA. These findings suggest GABA-histamine cross-talk may occur preferentially at low GABA concentrations, which could theoretically be inhibitory (via enhancing tonic inhibition), directly excitatory (via enhancing presynaptic GABAergic signaling), or indirectly excitatory (via inhibiting GABAergic interneurons).

Inhibition of brain [(3)H]cimetidine binding by improgan-like antinociceptive drugs

[(3)H]cimetidine, a radiolabeled histamine H(2) receptor antagonist, binds with high affinity to an unknown hemoprotein in the brain which is not the histamine H(2) receptor. Improgan, a close chemical congener of cimetidine, is a highly effective pain-relieving drug following CNS administration, yet its mechanism of action remains unknown. To test the hypothesis that the [(3)H]cimetidine-binding site is the improgan antinociceptive target, improgan, cimetidine, and 8 other chemical congeners were studied as potential inhibitors of [(3)H]cimetidine binding in membrane fractions from the rat brain. All compounds produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of [(3)H]cimetidine binding over a 500-fold range of potencies (K(i) values were 14.5 to >8000nM). However, antinociceptive potencies in rats did not significantly correlate with [(3)H]cimetidine-binding affinities (r=0.018, p=0.97, n=10). These results suggest that the [(3)H]cimetidine-binding site is not the analgesic target for improgan-like drugs.

Histamine in the nervous system

Histamine is a transmitter in the nervous system and a signaling molecule in the gut, the skin, and the immune system. Histaminergic neurons in mammalian brain are located exclusively in the tuberomamillary nucleus of the posterior hypothalamus and send their axons all over the central nervous system. Active solely during waking, they maintain wakefulness and attention. Three of the four known histamine receptors and binding to glutamate NMDA receptors serve multiple functions in the brain, particularly control of excitability and plasticity. H1 and H2 receptor-mediated actions are mostly excitatory; H3 receptors act as inhibitory auto- and heteroreceptors. Mutual interactions with other transmitter systems form a network that links basic homeostatic and higher brain functions, including sleep-wake regulation, circadian and feeding rhythms, immunity, learning, and memory in health and disease.

High-affinity binding of [3H]cimetidine to a heme-containing protein in rat brain

[(3)H]Cimetidine (3HCIM) specifically binds to an unidentified site in the rat brain. Because recently described ligands for this site have pharmacological activity, 3HCIM binding was characterized. 3HCIM binding was saturable, heat-labile, and distinct from the histamine H(2) receptor. To test the hypothesis that 3HCIM binds to a cytochrome P450 (P450), the effects of nonselective and isoform-selective P450 inhibitors were studied. The heme inhibitor KCN and the nonselective P450 inhibitor metyrapone both produced complete, concentration-dependent inhibition of 3HCIM binding (K(i) = 1.3 mM and 11.9 muM, respectively). Binding was largely unaffected by inhibitors of CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2D6, 2E1, and 19A1 but was eliminated by inhibitors of CYP2C19 (tranylcypromine) and CYP3A4 (ketoconazole). Synthesis and testing of CC11 [4(5)-(benzylthiomethyl)-1H-imidazole] and CC12 [4(5)-((4-iodobenzyl)-thiomethyl)-1H-imidazole] confirmed both drugs to be high-affinity inhibitors of 3HCIM binding. On recombinant human P450s, CC12 was a potent inhibitor of CYP2B6 (IC(50) = 11.7 nM), CYP2C19 (51.4 nM), and CYP19A1 (140.7 nM) and had a range of activities (100-494 nM) on nine other isoforms. Although the 3HCIM binding site pharmacologically resembles some P450s, eight recombinant human P450s and three recombinant rat P450s did not exhibit 3HCIM binding. Inhibition by KCN and metyrapone suggests that 3HCIM binds to a heme-containing brain protein (possibly a P450). However, results with selective P450 inhibitors, recombinant P450 isoforms, and a P450 antibody did not identify a 3HCIM-binding P450 isoform. Finally, CC12 is a new, potent inhibitor of CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 that may be a valuable tool for P450 research.

CC12, a high-affinity ligand for [3H]cimetidine binding, is an improgan antagonist

Improgan, a chemical congener of cimetidine, is a highly effective non-opioid analgesic when injected into the CNS. Despite extensive characterization, neither the improgan receptor, nor a pharmacological antagonist of improgan has been previously described. Presently, the specific binding of [(3)H]cimetidine (3HCIM) in brain fractions was used to discover 4(5)-((4-iodobenzyl)thiomethyl)-1H-imidazole, which behaved in vivo as the first improgan antagonist. The synthesis and pharmacological properties of this drug (named CC12) are described herein. In rats, CC12 (50-500nmol, i.c.v.) produced dose-dependent inhibition of improgan (200-400nmol) antinociception on the tail flick and hot plate tests. When given alone to rats, CC12 had no effects on nociceptive latencies, or on other observable behavioral or motor functions. Maximal inhibitory effects of CC12 (500nmol) were fully surmounted with a large i.c.v. dose of improgan (800nmol), demonstrating competitive antagonism. In mice, CC12 (200-400nmol, i.c.v.) behaved as a partial agonist, producing incomplete improgan antagonism, but also limited antinociception when given alone. Radioligand binding, receptor autoradiography, and electrophysiology experiments showed that CC12's antagonist properties are not explained by activity at 25 sites relevant to analgesia, including known receptors for cannabinoids, opioids or histamine. The use of CC12 as an improgan antagonist will facilitate the characterization of improgan analgesia. Furthermore, because CC12 was also found presently to inhibit opioid and cannabinoid antinociception, it is suggested that this drug modifies a biochemical mechanism shared by several classes of analgesics. Elucidation of this mechanism will enhance understanding of the biochemistry of pain relief.

Antinociceptive activity of chemical congeners of improgan: optimization of side chain length leads to the discovery of a new, potent, non-opioid analgesic

Improgan is a chemical congener of the H2 antagonist cimetidine which shows the profile of a highly effective analgesic when administered directly into the CNS. Although the improgan receptor is unknown, improgan activates analgesic pathways which are independent of opioids, but may utilize cannabinoid mechanisms. To discover selective, potent, improgan-like drugs, seven compounds chemically related to improgan were synthesized and tested for antinociceptive activity in rats after intracerebroventricular (icv) administration. Among a series of improgan congeners in which the alkyl chain length of improgan ((-CH2)3-) was varied, five compounds showed full agonist antinociceptive activity with potencies greater than that of improgan. VUF5420 (containing (-CH2)4-, EC50 = 86.1 nmol) produced maximal antinociceptive activity after doses which showed no motor impairment or other obvious toxicity, and was 2.3-fold more potent than improgan (EC50 = 199.5 nmol). As found previously with improgan, VUF5420-induced antinociception was unaffected by administration of the opioid antagonist naltrexone, but was inhibited by the CB1 antagonist SR141716A, suggesting a non-opioid, cannabinoid-related analgesic action. However, VUF5420 showed very low affinity (Kd approximately 10 microM) on CB1-receptor activation of 35S-GTPgammaS binding, indicating that this drug does not directly interact with the CB1 receptor in vivo. The present results show that VUF5420 is a high potency, improgan-like, non-opioid analgesic which may indirectly activate cannabinoid pain-relieving mechanisms.

Antinociceptive, brain-penetrating derivatives related to improgan, a non-opioid analgesic

The antinociceptive profile of selected histamine H(2) and histamine H(3) receptor antagonists led to the discovery of improgan, a non-brain-penetrating analgesic agent which does not act on known histamine receptors. Because no chemical congener of improgan has yet been discovered which has both antinociceptive and brain-penetrating properties, the present study investigated the antinociceptive effects of a series of chemical compounds related to zolantidine, a brain-penetrating histamine H(2) receptor antagonist. The drugs studied presently contain the piperidinomethylphenoxy (PMPO) moiety, hypothesized to introduce brain-penetrating characteristics. Following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) dosing in rats, six of eight drugs produced dose- and time-related antinociception on both the tail flick and hot plate tests over a nearly eight-fold range of potencies. Ataxia and other motor side effects were observed after high doses of these drugs, but two of the compounds (SKF94674 and loxtidine) produced maximal antinociception at doses which were completely devoid of these motor effects. Consistent with the hypothesis that PMPO-containing drugs are brain-penetrating analgesics, SKF94674 and another derivative (JB-9322) showed dose-dependent antinociceptive activity 15 to 30 min after systemic dosing in mice, but these effects were accompanied by seizures and death beginning 45 min after dosing. Other drugs showed a similar pattern of antinociceptive and toxic effects. In addition, loxtidine produced seizures without antinociception, whereas zolantidine produced neither effect after systemic dosing in mice. Although several of the drugs tested have histamine H(2) receptor antagonist activity, neither the antinociception nor the toxicity was correlated with histamine H(2) receptor activity. The present results are the first to demonstrate the existence of brain-penetrating antinociceptive agents chemically related to zolantidine and improgan, but further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of both the pain relief and toxicity produced by these agents.

Absence of 5-HT3 and cholinergic mechanisms in improgan antinociception

Improgan, an analgesic derived from histamine antagonists, acts in the brain stem to activate descending non-opioid, pain-relieving circuits, but the mechanism of action of this drug remains elusive. Because improgan has a moderate affinity for 5-HT(3) receptors, and, since cholinergic and serotonergic drugs can modulate descending analgesic circuits, roles for 5-HT(3), nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in improgan antinociception were presently investigated in rats. Improgan (80 microg, icv) induced nearly maximal inhibition of hot plate and tail flick nociceptive responses, and these actions we unaffected by antagonists of muscarinic (atropine, 5.9 mg/kg, i.p.) and nicotinic (mecamylamine, 2 mg/kg, i.p.) receptors. Control experiments verified that these antagonist treatments were maximally effective against muscarinic and nicotinic antinociception in both tests. In addition, improgan antinociception was unaffected by icv pretreatment with a 5-HT(3) antagonist (ondansetron, 20 microg). When given alone, icv treatment with neither this antagonist nor a 5-HT(3) agonist (m-chlorophenylbiguanide, 1000 nmol, icv) modified thermal nociceptive latencies. These results show no role for supraspinal cholinergic and 5-HT(3) receptors in improgan antinociception. The findings help to narrow the search for the relevant mediators of the action of this novel analgesic agent.

Activation of brain stem nuclei by improgan, a non-opioid analgesic

Improgan is a compound developed from histamine antagonists which shows the pre-clinical profile of a highly effective, non-opioid analgesic when administered into the rodent CNS. Pharmacological studies suggest that improgan activates descending pain-relieving circuits, but the brain and spinal sites of action of this drug have not been previously studied. Presently, the effects of intracerebral and intrathecal microinjections of improgan were evaluated on thermal nociceptive responses in rats. Improgan produced large, dose- and time-related reductions in nociceptive responses following administration into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (PAG), the dorsal PAG, and the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). The drug had no measurable effects after injections into the caudate nucleus, basolateral amygdala, hippocampus, ventromedial hypothalamus, superior colliculi, ventrolateral medulla, or the spinal subarachnoid space. Inactivation of the RVM by muscimol microinjections completely attenuated antincociceptive responses produced by intraventricular improgan. These findings, taken with earlier results, show that, like opioids and cannabinoids, improgan acts in the PAG and RVM to activate descending analgesic systems. Unlike these other analgesics, improgan does not act in the spinal cord or in CNS areas outside of the brain stem.