A pilot trial of nivolumab treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with mild idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

High incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pneumonitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial pneumonia, regardless of honeycomb lung or forced vital capacity: results from a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a common comorbidity with poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a risk factor for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced pneumonitis. This study aimed to assess the incidence, severity, and risk factors of ICI-induced pneumonitis in patients with NSCLC and idiopathic IP.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study involved patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and comorbid idiopathic IP and receiving ICI monotherapy as the second or subsequent line. A board-certified radiologist centrally reviewed all computed tomography images at baseline and at the onset of pneumonitis. Logistic regression analysis with clinical, laboratory, and radiological variables was used to examine the risk factors for pneumonitis.

RESULTS

This study included 65 patients with a median age of 71 years, 98.5% of whom had a smoking history. Three ICIs were used and a median of three cycles. Honeycomb lung was present in 23.1% of the patients, and the median % forced vital capacity (FVC) was 95.0%. Notably, 23.1% of the patients exhibited all-grade pneumonitis and 15.4% exhibited grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis. No significant risk factors for pneumonitis were identified after univariate logistic regression analysis. The incidence and severity of ICI-induced pneumonitis did not differ between patients with and without honeycomb lung or with FVC ≥ 80% versus < 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis of patients with NSCLC, the risk of ICI-induced pneumonitis did not differ based on radiologic patterns of comorbid IP, presence or absence of honeycomb lung, or pulmonary function tests.

Senescent lung fibroblasts in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis facilitate non-small cell lung cancer progression by secreting exosomal MMP1

Lung cancer is a fatal complication of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with a poor prognosis. Current treatments are insufficient in improving the prognosis of lung cancer patients with comorbid idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF-LC). Senescent fibroblasts, as stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment, influence tumor progression via exosomes. With evidence that fibroblast senescence is an important mechanism of IPF, we investigated the impact of senescent IPF lung fibroblast (diseased human lung fibroblasts, DHLF)-derived exosomes on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We found DHLF expressed significant senescence markers, and promoted NSCLC proliferation, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Specifically, senescent DHLF showed strong secretion of exosomes, and these exosomes enhanced the proliferation and colony-forming ability of cancer cells. Proteomic analysis showed DHLF-derived exosomes exhibited upregulated senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors, notably MMP1, which activates the surface receptor PAR1. Knocking down MMP1 or using PAR1 inhibitors reduced the tumor-promoting effects of DHLF-derived exosomes in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, MMP1 acted by activating the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. In conclusion, our results suggest that exosomal MMP1 derived from senescent IPF fibroblasts promotes NSCLC proliferation and colony formation by targeting PAR1 and activating the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. These findings provide a novel therapeutic approach for patients with IPF-LC.

Carboplatin in combination with etoposide for advanced small cell lung cancer complicated with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: a single-arm phase II study

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbation (AEx) of interstitial pneumonia is the most common lethal adverse event related to the pharmacological treatment of patients with lung cancer complicated with interstitial pneumonia. Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is linked to poor prognosis, it exhibits good response to chemotherapy. Few previous research studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of treatment for advanced SCLC complicated with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). We conducted a single-arm phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus etoposide for the treatment of patients with SCLC complicated with IIP.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced SCLC complicated with IIP were enrolled. Patients received carboplatin every 21-28 days at a dose of area under the curve 4-6 on day 1 and etoposide at a dose of 80-100 mg/m2 on days 1-3.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled between December 2009 and December 2022. A median of four cycles of carboplatin plus etoposide were administered. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia was not observed; the rate of AEx was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0-9.6%, p = 0.038). The objective response rate was 83.9% (95% CI: 82.5-85.2). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.9 (95% CI: 4.7-6.8) months and 14.0 (95% CI: 7.6-27.6) months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 61% (95% CI 41-76).

CONCLUSIONS

The carboplatin plus etoposide treatment was tolerable and effective in SCLC patients complicated with IIP.

Durvalumab with etoposide and carboplatin for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease: A multicenter, open-label prospective trial

OBJECTIVES

Certain guidelines recommend caution when administering immunotherapy in patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) owing to the high incidence of pneumonitis induced by anti-cancer therapy. A prospective clinical trial assessing the safety of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and pre-existing ILD is warranted. Therefore, this study evaluated the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC and mild idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP).

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective trial, patients with ES-SCLC and pre-existing mild chronic fibrosing IIP were recruited. Mild IIP was defined as the exclusion of poor pulmonary function, a definite usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, and positivity for autoantibodies in blood tests. The patients received durvalumab, etoposide, and carboplatin every three weeks (induction phase), followed by 1,500 mg durvalumab every four weeks (maintenance phase). The primary endpoint was severe pneumonitis-free rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 13 patients displayed a probable UIP pattern, whereas eight patients exhibited an indeterminate for UIP pattern. Two patients (9.5 %) had pneumonitis of any grade during the induction phase; one had Grade 1 and the other had Grade 5 pneumonitis. No other patient developed pneumonitis during the maintenance phase. The severe pneumonitis-free rate was 95.2 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 77.3-99.2 %). The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95 % CI: 3.6-6.4 months). Median overall survival was 10.7 months (95 % CI: 6.0 months to not reached).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoimmunotherapy is a feasible treatment approach for patients with ES-SCLC and mild IIP.

Japanese guidelines for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 2023:Revised edition

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an interstitial lung disease with a poor prognosis and an unknown cause that generally progresses to pulmonary fibrosis and leads to irreversible tissue alteration. The "Guidelines for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 2017," specializing in the treatment of IPF for the first time in Japan and presenting evidence-based standard treatment methods suited to the state of affairs in Japan, was published in 2017, in line with the 2014 version of "Formulation procedure for Minds Clinical Practice Guidelines." Because new evidence had accumulated, we formulated the "Guidelines for the treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 2023 (revised 2nd edition)." While keeping the revision consistent with the ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT IPF treatment guidelines, new clinical questions (CQs) on pulmonary hypertension were added to the chronic stage, in addition to acute exacerbation and comorbid lung cancer, which greatly affect the prognosis but are not described in the ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT IPF guidelines. Regarding the advanced stages, we additionally created expert consensus-based advice for palliative care and lung transplantation. The number of CQs increased from 17 in the first edition to 24. It is important that these guidelines be used not only by respiratory specialists but also by general practitioners, patients, and their families; therefore, we plan to revise them appropriately in line with ever-advancing medical progress.

Treatment Strategies for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Respiratory Disease; Interstitial Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Tuberculosis

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are often complicated by other respiratory diseases, including interstitial pneumonia (IP), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), and the management of which can be problematic. NSCLC patients with IP sometimes develop fatal acute exacerbation induced by pharmacotherapy, and the establishment of a safe treatment strategy is desirable. For advanced NSCLC with IP, carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel is a relatively safe and effective first-line treatment option. Although the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for these populations remains controversial, ICIs have the potential to provide long-term survival. The severity of COPD is an important prognostic factor in NSCLC patients. Although COPD complications do not necessarily limit treatment options, it is important to select drugs with fewer side effects on the heart and blood vessels as well as the lungs. Active TB is complicated by 2-5% of NSCLC cases during their disease course. Since pharmacotherapy, especially ICIs, reportedly induces the development of TB, the possibility of developing TB should always be kept in mind during NSCLC treatment. To date, there is no coherent review article on NSCLC with these pulmonary complications. This review article summarizes the current evidence and discusses future prospects for treatment strategies for NSCLC patients complicated with IP, severe COPD, and TB.

Nintedanib plus Chemotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Rationale: A fatal acute exacerbation (AE) occasionally develops during chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with comorbid idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).Objectives: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of carboplatin, etoposide, and nintedanib combination therapy for unresectable SCLC with comorbid IPF.Methods: The NEXT-SHIP study is a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial for unresectable SCLC with IPF (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials registry number jRCTs031190119). The patients received carboplatin, etoposide, and nintedanib (150 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint was the incidence of IPF-AE at 28 days after the last administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy, and the sample size was set at 33 (5.0% expected, 20.0% threshold).Results: A total of 33 patients were registered; 87.9% were male, the median age was 73 years, the median percentage forced vital capacity was 85.2%, and 51.5% had honeycomb lungs. The median observation period was 10.5 months. The incidence of IPF-AE at 28 days after the last administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy was 3.0% (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-13.6). The objective response rate was 68.8% (95% CI, 50.0-83.9). The median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-5.5) and 13.4 months (95% CI, 8.1-21.6), respectively. The most common adverse event of grade 3 or higher was neutropenia (81.8%), followed by leukopenia (39.4%) and thrombocytopenia (30.3%).Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint regarding the incidence of IPF-AEs with promising results for efficacy. Carboplatin, etoposide, and nintedanib combination therapy may be one of the standard treatment options for SCLC with comorbid IPF.Clinical trial registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031190119).

Are immune checkpoint inhibitors safe and effective in lung cancer patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease?

Aim: This study aims to clarify the efficacy and adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the lung cancer patients with a history of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: From the inception of the database to 4 April 2023, we systematically searched the four databases. Results: The objective remission rate, disease control rate, incidence of immune-associated pneumonitis (ICIP) in the combined ILD group were significantly higher than those in the non-combined ILD group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in progression-free survival, overall survival, renal insufficiency, thyroid dysfunction and gastrointestinal toxicity. Conclusion: Generally, a pre-existing ILD history can increase the efficacy and incidence of ICIs' adverse reactions. Therefore, ICIs should be administered with caution.

KRASG12C Inhibitor as a Treatment Option for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Interstitial Pneumonia

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with comorbid interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a population with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Patients with comorbid IP are at high risk of developing fatal drug-induced pneumonitis, and data on the safety and efficacy of molecularly targeted therapies are lacking. KRAS mutations have been frequently detected in patients with NSCLC with comorbid IP. However, the low detection rate of common driver gene mutations, such as epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase, in patients with comorbid IP frequently results in inadequate screening for driver mutations, and KRAS mutations may be overlooked. Recently, sotorasib and adagrasib were approved as treatment options for advanced NSCLC with KRASG12C mutations. Although patients with comorbid IP were not excluded from clinical trials of these KRASG12C inhibitors, the incidence of drug-induced pneumonitis was low. Therefore, KRASG12C inhibitors may be a safe and effective treatment option for NSCLC with comorbid IP. This review article discusses the promise and prospects of molecular-targeted therapies, especially KRASG12C inhibitors, for NSCLC with comorbid IP, along with our own clinical experience.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with lung cancer having chronic interstitial pneumonia

Background

In interstitial pneumonia (IP)-associated lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (ICIP) is common with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of ICI treatment for patients with lung cancer with IP.

Methods

This multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted from June 2016 to December 2020 in patients with primary lung cancer with IP who received ICI treatment.

Results

A total of 200 patients (median age 70 years; male/female, 176/24) were enrolled from 27 institutions. ICIP occurred in 61 patients (30.5%), pneumonitis grades 3-5 in 32 patients (15.5%) and death in nine patients (4.5%). The common computed tomography pattern of ICIP was organising pneumonia in 29 patients (47.5%). Subsequently, diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) pattern was observed in 19 patients (31.1%) who had a significantly worse prognosis than those with a non-DAD pattern (median progression-free survival (PFS) 115 days versus 226 days, p=0.042; median overall survival (OS) 334 days versus 1316 days, p<0.001). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in approximately 50% of patients. Patients with irAEs (n=100) had a better prognosis than those without irAEs (n=100) (median PFS 200 days versus 77 days, p<0.001; median OS 597 days versus 390 days p=0.0074). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 41.3% and 68.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

Although ICI treatment was effective for patients with lung cancer with IP, ICIP developed in approximately 30% of patients. Patients with irAEs had a significantly better PFS and OS than those without irAEs.

Pre-existing Interstitial Lung Abnormalities and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy over previous cytotoxic chemotherapies in clinical trials among various tumors. Despite their favorable outcomes, they are associated with a unique set of toxicities termed as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among the toxicities, ICI-related pneumonitis has poor outcomes with little understanding of its risk factors. This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether pre-existing interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is a potential risk factor for ICI-related pneumonitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer, malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and gastric cancer, who was administered either nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab between September 2014 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Information on baseline characteristics, computed tomography findings before administration of ICIs, clinical outcomes, and irAEs were collected from their medical records. Pre-existing ILA was categorized based on previous studies.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-nine patients with a median age of 68 years were included and 23 (11.0%) developed ICI-related pneumonitis. While smoking history and ICI agents were associated with ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .005 and .044, respectively), the categories of ILA were not associated with ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .428). None of the features of lung abnormalities were also associated with ICI-related pneumonitis. Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that smoking history was the only significant predictor of ICI-related pneumonitis (P = .028).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study did not demonstrate statistically significant association between pre-existing ILA and ICI-related pneumonitis, nor an association between radiologic features of ILA and ICI-related pneumonitis. Smoking history was independently associated with ICI-related pneumonitis. Further research is warranted for further understanding of the risk factors of ICI-related pneumonitis.

Outcome following nivolumab treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and comorbid interstitial lung disease in a real-world setting

Background

Up to 10% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) have pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD). These patients are usually excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials. Consequently, knowledge on outcomes following nivolumab treatment in these patients remains limited. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate survival outcome following nivolumab treatment in ILD patients with pre-treated aNSCLC in the real-world setting.

Patients and methods

The study included all patients with aNSCLC recorded in the French hospital database, starting nivolumab in 2015-2016. Patients were stratified by pre-existing ILD and three subgroups were studied [auto-immune or granulomatous (AI/G) ILD, other known causes ILD and idiopathic ILD]. Time to discontinuation of nivolumab treatment [time to treatment duration (TTD)] and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results

Of 10,452 aNSCLC patients initiating nivolumab, 148 (1.4%) had pre-existing ILD. Mean age at nivolumab initiation was 64.6 ± 9.4 years in ILD and 63.8 ± 9.6 years in non-ILD. Compared to non-ILD, patients in the ILD group were more frequently men (p < 0.05) and had more comorbidities (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between ILD and non-ILD groups for median TTD (2.5 versus 2.8 months; p = 0.6) or median OS (9.6 versus 11.9 months; p = 0.1). Median OS in AI/G ILD (n = 14), other known causes ILD (n = 75), and idiopathic ILD (n = 59) were 8.6, 10.7, and 9.6 months, respectively.

Conclusion

In this large cohort of aNSCLC patients with ILD, outcomes are similar to those obtained in the non-ILD population. Immunotherapy could be beneficial for these patients.

Nintedanib in an elderly non-small-cell lung cancer patient with severe steroid-refractory checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis: A case report and literature review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors tremendously improve cancer prognosis; however, severe-grade immune-related adverse events may cause premature death. Current recommendations for checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) treatment are mainly about immunosuppressive therapy, and anti-fibrotic agents are also needed, especially for patients with poor response to corticosteroids and a longer pneumonitis course. This is because fibrotic changes play an important role in the pathological evolution of CIP. Here, we report a case demonstrating that nintedanib is a promising candidate drug for CIP management or prevention, as it has potent anti-fibrotic efficacy and a safety profile. Moreover, nintedanib could partially inhibit tumor growth in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, and its efficacy can be improved in combination with other anti-tumor therapies.

Reply to: Pharmacotherapy for lung cancer with comorbid interstitial pneumonia: limited evidence requires appropriate evaluation

The divergent views on lung cancer treatments in fibrosing lung patients reflect differences due to variable side-effect incidences in different countries and among ethnicities. International efforts are needed to better define treatment approaches. https://bit.ly/3DX40fq.

Pharmacotherapy for lung cancer with comorbid interstitial pneumonia: limited evidence requires appropriate evaluation

This article is a correspondence to the review article on lung cancer with comorbid interstitial pneumonia, particularly with regard to pharmacotherapy. Limited evidence needs to be accurately evaluated and utilised for these patients with poor prognosis. https://bit.ly/3BGRCz4.

Efficacy and safety of second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer complicated by interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is limited because of the risk of its acute exacerbation (AE). Furthermore, the efficacy and safety of second-line chemotherapy for these patients is unclear.

METHODS

To investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC patients with ILD, we retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated at our institute between April 2010 and December 2018.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients received two or more regimens. Thirty-four patients were male and the median age at the initiation of second-line chemotherapy was 70 years. Almost all patients had a smoking history. Fourteen patients had adenocarcinoma and 15 had squamous cell carcinoma histology. Stages III and IV were observed in 20 and 11 patients, respectively. With respect to the type of ILD, 12 patients had usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 11.4 and 68.6%, respectively. The median progression-free and median overall survival were 4.1 and 6.4 months, respectively. The AE of ILD was observed in eight patients, five of whom died. UIP and low percentage vital capacity were detected as significant risk factors for the AE of ILD.

CONCLUSION

Second-line chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC complicated by ILD showed a certain effectiveness, but some patients experienced the AE of ILD, which may lead to death. The risk of the AE of ILD must be considered especially for patients with UIP and low percentage VC.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - 2021 update. Full-length version

BACKGROUND

Since the latest 2017 French guidelines, knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has evolved considerably.

METHODS

Practical guidelines were drafted on the initiative of the Coordinating Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, led by the French Language Pulmonology Society (SPLF), by a coordinating group, a writing group, and a review group, with the involvement of the entire OrphaLung network, pulmonologists practicing in various settings, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a health manager, and a patient association. The method followed the "Clinical Practice Guidelines" process of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), including an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After a literature review, 54 guidelines were formulated, improved, and then validated by the working groups. These guidelines addressed multiple aspects of the disease: epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT scans, lung biopsy indication and procedures, etiological workup, methods and indications for family screening and genetic testing, assessment of the functional impairment and prognosis, indication and use of antifibrotic agents, lung transplantation, management of symptoms, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to guide the diagnosis and practical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Atezolizumab for Pretreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia: Final Analysis of Phase II AMBITIOUS Study

Background

Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a poor prognostic comorbidity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is also a risk factor for pneumonitis. The TORG1936/AMBITIOUS trial, the first known phase II study of atezolizumab in patients with NSCLC with comorbid IP, was terminated early because of the high incidence of severe pneumonitis.

Methods

This study included patients with idiopathic chronic fibrotic IP, with a predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) of >70%, with or without honeycomb lung, who had previously been treated for NSCLC. The patients received atezolizumab every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the 1-year survival rate.

Results

A total of 17 patients were registered; the median %FVC was 85.4%, and 41.2% had honeycomb lungs. The 1-year survival rate was 53.3% (95% CI, 25.9-74.6). The median overall and progression-free survival times were 15.3 months (95% CI, 3.1-not reached) and 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.2-7.4), respectively. The incidence of pneumonitis was 29.4% for all grades, and 23.5% for grade ≥3. Tumor mutational burden and any of the detected somatic mutations were not associated with efficacy or risk of pneumonitis.

Conclusion

Atezolizumab may be one of the treatment options for patients with NSCLC with comorbid IP, despite the high risk of developing pneumonitis. This clinical trial was retrospectively registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on August 26, 2019, (registry number: jRCTs031190084, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031190084).

The safety and efficacy of durvalumab consolidation therapy in the management of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and preexisting interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Some lung cancer patients have preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD), which is considered a risk factor for lung cancer treatment. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of durvalumab consolidation therapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and preexisting ILD.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients who were judged to be tolerable to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for stage III NSCLC were enrolled. Differences in the incidence rate of radiation pneumonitis (RP) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed in patients with or without ILD of which CT showed non-usual interstitial pneumonia pattern between the durvalumab consolidation group and chemotherapy (combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel [CP]) consolidation group.

RESULTS

The incidence of RP was higher in patients with preexisting ILD (40% and 20% in the durvalumab and CP groups, respectively) than in those without ILD (26% and 8% in the durvalumab and CP groups, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that durvalumab therapy tended to increase the incidence of RP; however, preexisting ILD did not significantly increase the incidence of RP. The condition of all patients who developed RP improved with the administration of oral prednisolone. Among patients without ILD, the median PFS was 17 and 16 months in the durvalumab and CP groups, respectively. Among patients with preexisting ILD, median PFS was not achieved in the durvalumab group and was 8 months in the CP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although durvalumab consolidation therapy tended to increase the incidence of RP, it might be tolerable in stage III NSCLC patients with preexisting ILD.

Is the Efficacy of Adding Ramucirumab to Docetaxel Related to a History of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Real-World Clinical Practice?

Simple Summary

Previous studies have shown that the use of chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer improved overall survival and progression-free survival. However, the efficacy of cytotoxic agents as a second-line or later-line therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the real-world clinical practice is still controversial. In the present study, we retrospectively evaluated patients with non-small cell lung cancer to clarify whether the previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors impacts the efficacy of docetaxel or the combined therapy of docetaxel plus ramucirumab. The results of this study using real-world data show that the addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel is superior to docetaxel monotherapy for improving time-to-treatment failure and overall survival, irrespective of previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Abstract

Reports on the efficacy of second-line treatment with cytotoxic agents after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors are limited. Here, we retrospectively evaluated patients in the real-world clinical practice treated with docetaxel or docetaxel plus ramucirumab. Ninety-three patients treated with docetaxel or docetaxel plus ramucirumab as a second- or later-line therapy were included. The patients were categorized into the following four treatment groups: docetaxel group (n = 50), docetaxel/ramucirumab group (n = 43) and pretreated (n = 45) and untreated (n = 48) with immune checkpoint inhibitor groups. The docetaxel/ramucirumab group showed an overall response rate of 57.1% in patients pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and 20% in untreated patients. The docetaxel group showed an overall response rate of 15.4% in patients pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and 5.0% in untreated patients. The median time-to-treatment failure and the median survival time were longer in the docetaxel/ramucirumab group than in the docetaxel group in both immune checkpoint inhibitor-pretreated and -untreated groups. There was no difference in time-to-treatment failure and overall survival between immune checkpoint inhibitor-pretreated and -untreated groups in each docetaxel and docetaxel/ramucirumab treatment group. In conclusion, our real-world data show that the addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel was superior to docetaxel monotherapy for improving time-to-treatment failure and overall survival, irrespective of previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Clinical Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Preexisting Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD) are often excluded from clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), leaving a gap in knowledge.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the clinical outcomes of ICIs in patients with NSCLC and preexisting ILD?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library through April 2021 with no language or study design restrictions. Studies reporting the safety and efficacy data among patients with cancer and ILD receiving ICI therapy were collected. The primary end points were clinical efficacy to immunotherapy and the incidence of immune-related adverse events, especially for checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP).

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients in 10 studies were included. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) and pooled disease control rate (DCR) were 34% (95% CI, 20-47) and 66% (95% CI, 56-75), respectively. The ORR in patients with preexisting ILD was significantly higher than that in patients without ILD (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.31-3.00). The DCR and progression-free survival in patients with preexisting ILD were not inferior to those without ILD (pooled OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.94-2.25 for DCR). The pooled incidences of any grade and grade 3 or higher CIP were 27% (95% CI, 17-37) and 15% (95% CI, 9-22) in patients with preexisting ILD, and 10% (95% CI, 6-13) and 4% (95% CI, 2-6) in patients without ILD. Meta-analysis found a significantly higher incidence rate of any grade and grade 3 or higher CIP in patients with NSCLC and preexisting ILD than in those patients without ILD (OR, 3.23 [95% CI, 2.06-5.06]; OR, 2.91 [95% CI, 1.47-5.74]).

INTERPRETATION

Programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors had favorable efficacy in NSCLC with preexisting ILD. CIP is frequent in patients with preexisting ILD who receive ICI therapy but is often mild and easily manageable. Clinicians should be cautious when using ICIs in patients with preexisting ILD.

Outcomes of proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with interstitial pneumonia

Background

Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a disease with a poor prognosis. In addition, IP patients are more likely to develop lung cancer. Since IP patients frequently develop toxicities during cancer treatment, minimally invasive cancer treatment is warranted for such patients to maintain their quality of life. This study retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of proton therapy (PT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with IP.

Methods

Twenty-nine NSCLC patients with IP were treated with PT between September 2013 and December 2019. The patients had stage IA to IIIB primary NSCLC. Ten of the 29 patients exhibited the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. The prescribed dose was 66–74 Grays (relative biological effectiveness) in 10–37 fractions.

Results

The median follow-up period was 21.1 months [interquartile range (IQR), 15.6–37.3] for all patients and 37.2 months (IQR, 24.0–49.9) for living patients. The median patient age was 77 years (IQR, 71–81). The median planning target volume was 112.0 ml (IQR, 56.1–246.3). The 2-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85% (95% confidence interval: 57–95), 30% (15–47), and 45% (26–62), respectively. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0), grade 3 acute radiation pneumonitis (RP) was observed in 1 patient. Two patients developed grade 3 late RP, but no other patients experienced serious toxicities. The patients’ quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 and SF-36) scores had not changed after 3 months.

Conclusions

PT may be a relatively safe treatment for NSCLC patients with IP, without deteriorating quality of life scores within 3 months.

Current Treatment Strategies for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Interstitial Pneumonia

Of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 5-10% have interstitial pneumonia (IP) at the time of diagnosis. To avoid fatal acute exacerbations of pre-existing IP, appropriate patient selection and low-risk treatment choices are warranted. Risk factors for acute exacerbation of pre-existing IP with cytotoxic drugs include honeycomb lungs on computed tomography (CT) and low forced vital capacity, but risk factors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not been fully investigated. For advanced or recurrent NSCLC with comorbid IP, carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel is the standard of care for first-line treatment, but second-line or later treatment has not been established. ICI holds great promise for long-term survival, but many challenges remain, including safety and appropriate patient selection. Since the indications for pharmacotherapy and radiotherapy for NSCLC with comorbid IP are quite limited, surgical resection should be considered as much as possible for patients with operable stages. A scoring system has been reported to predict the risk of postoperative acute exacerbation of pre-existing IP, but perioperative treatment has not been established. In the future, it is necessary to accumulate more cases and conduct further research, not only in Japan but also worldwide.

Effectiveness of corticosteroids on immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced interstitial pneumonia among patients with a history of interstitial pneumonia: A case series

There are few reports on the effectiveness of corticosteroids for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced interstitial pneumonia in patients with a history of interstitial pneumonia. We report on 10 non-small cell lung cancer patients with a history of interstitial pneumonia who experienced immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced interstitial pneumonia. The immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced interstitial pneumonia lasted for a median duration of 41.5 days (range = 22–127 days). Eight of the ten patients responded to corticosteroid monotherapy; one patient responded to corticosteroids and the immunosuppressant, tacrolimus; and one patient did not improve after corticosteroid treatment. In non-small cell lung cancer patients with a history of interstitial pneumonia, immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced interstitial pneumonia was generally responds to corticosteroids.

Paired analysis of tumor mutation burden for lung adenocarcinoma and associated idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Genetic alterations underlying the development of lung cancer in individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have remained unclear. To explore whether genetic alterations in IPF tissue contribute to the development of IPF-associated lung cancer, we here evaluated tumor mutation burden (TMB) and somatic variants in 14 paired IPF and tumor samples from patients with IPF-associated lung adenocarcinoma. We also determined TMB for 22 samples of lung adenocarcinoma from patients without IPF. TMB for IPF-associated lung adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than that for matched IPF tissue (median of 2.94 vs. 1.26 mutations/Mb, P = 0.002). Three and 102 somatic variants were detected in IPF and matched lung adenocarcinoma samples, respectively, with only one pair of specimens sharing one somatic variant. TMB for IPF-associated lung adenocarcinoma was similar to that for lung adenocarcinoma samples with driver mutations (median of 2.94 vs. 2.51 mutations/Mb) and lower than that for lung adenocarcinoma samples without known driver mutations (median of 2.94 vs. 5.03 mutations/Mb, P = 0.130) from patients without IPF. Our findings suggest that not only the accumulation of somatic mutations but other factors such as inflammation and oxidative stress might contribute to the development and progression of lung cancer in patients with IPF.

Management and Prognosis of Interstitial Lung Disease With Lung Cancer (ILD-LC): A Real-World Cohort From Three Medical Centers in China

Background and Objective

Interstitial lung disease with lung cancer (ILD-LC) is rare and its management has not been fully described. This study aimed to investigate the management and prognosis of ILD-LC patients in China.

Methods

The present analysis is a retrospective real-world cohort study. Clinical data of ILD-LC patients were obtained from 3 hospitals in China. The overall survival (OS) of patients was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

Results

One hundred eighty-four ILD-LC patients included were biased toward male (85.3%), smokers (75.5%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (58.2%) patients with comorbidities (67.9%) and ECOG-PS score of 1 (65.2%). Most patients were advanced peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. The initial anti-cancer regimen for ILD-LC is mainly chemotherapy, and patients with early-stage LC prefer surgery. In the anti-cancer cohort, the number of ILD-LC patients who underwent the 2nd and 3rd or more anti-cancer regimens were 78 (55.7%) and 32 (22.8%), respectively. In the non-anticancer cohort, the median OS was 3.5 months. In the early-stage cohort, the median OS was 14.2 months in the systematic therapy group; however, the median OS was not reached in the surgery group. In the advanced-stage cohort with systematic therapy, the median OS was 7.2 months. Interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and anti-angiogenesis were associated with OS in the univariate analysis, whereas anti-angiogenesis was an independent protective factor for advanced LC with ILD.

Conclusion

Patients with ILD-LC have very poor prognosis. Appropriate anti-tumor treatment can prolong the survival time of patients who can tolerate it. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are alternative treatments for LC patients with mild ILD. For ILD patients with advanced LC, antiangiogenic regimens significantly improve the prognosis of the disease.

Non-inferior clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective medical data from advanced or recurrent NSCLC patients who were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab at ten institutions in Japan between January 2016 and September 2018 were analyzed. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of pre-existing ILD.

RESULTS

A total of 461 NSCLC patients were enrolled, 412 without ILD (Non-ILD group) and 49 with ILD (ILD group). The response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the ILD group were not inferior to those of the Non-ILD group [RR: 49.0 % (24/49) vs. 30.1 % (124/412), P < 0.01 and DCR: 69.4 % (34/49) vs. 51.2 % (211/412), P = 0.016, respectively]. Non-inferior outcomes were also observed with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (median PFS: 5.9 months vs. 3.5 months, P = 0.14 and median OS: 27.8 months vs. 25.2 months, P = 0.74 in the ILD and Non-ILD groups, respectively). Among immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) was more frequently observed among NSCLC patients in the ILD group [30.6 % (15/49) vs. 9.5 % (39/412), P < 0.01]. The frequency of irAEs other than CIP and infusion reactions was not significantly different between the ILD group and the Non-ILD group.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the clinical outcomes of ICIs are not significantly affected by pre-existing ILD despite the increased frequency of CIP. NSCLC patients with ILD are therefore probable candidates for ICIs.

A Phase 2 Study of Atezolizumab for Pretreated NSCLC With Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonitis

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is one of the most common and poor prognostic comorbidities in patients with NSCLC and a known risk factor for pneumonitis. Atezolizumab monotherapy is an established treatment for recurrent NSCLC and reported to have a lower risk of pneumonitis than programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced or recurrent NSCLC with idiopathic IP.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC with comorbid idiopathic, chronic fibrotic IP with % forced vital capacity of greater than 70% and no history of immune checkpoint inhibitors were enrolled. The patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg) every 3 weeks until the discontinuation criteria were met. The primary end point of this study was the 1-year survival rate. A sample size of 38 patients was set.

RESULTS

This study was terminated early owing to high incidence of pneumonitis. A total of 17 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 70 years. The median % forced vital capacity and % diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide at baseline were 85.4% and 54.4%, respectively. The incidence of pneumonitis was 29.4% (5 of 17) for all grades, 23.5% (4 of 17) for grade greater than or equal to 3, and 5.9% (1 of 17) for grade 5. A total of 57.1% patients (4 of 7) with honeycomb lung developed pneumonitis with a grade greater than or equal to 3, whereas only one patient (10%) without honeycomb lung (n = 10) with grade 1 pneumonitis was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NSCLC with comorbid IP as defined by the selection criteria for this study might have an increased risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pneumonitis.

Case of Merkel cell carcinoma in a patient with pre-existing ILD

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine tumor of the skin with high rates of local recurrence and distant metastases despite treatment with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies. The recent advances in immunotherapy, including the use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized treatment for this disease and resulted in durable responses for some patients. However, many patients, due to underlying conditions, have been insufficiently evaluated for potential use of immunotherapy. Here we present a case of ICB treatment with Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibition in a patient with underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD) and a new diagnosis of MCC. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we were able to maintain close monitoring with serial clinical and radiographical follow-up. The patient achieved a complete response though unrelated medical issues resulting in a treatment hold. At the last follow-up, the patient continued to experience a durable response without evidence of recurrence. This case describes the use of pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, for the treatment of MCC in a patient with underlying ILD. The use of active surveillance with a multidisciplinary approach resulted in successful treatment of MCC without exacerbation of the underlying ILD.

Pulmonary Complications of Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer. Although immunotherapy generally has a more favorable safety profile when compared with chemotherapy, immune-related adverse events represent important, but incompletely understood, treatment-limiting complications associated with significant morbidity and mortality risk. Current guidelines for diagnosis and management are derived from consensus experience, highlighting that further prospective investigation in this area is needed. As ICI-related pneumonitis is a clinically and radiographically diverse toxidrome, clinical vigilance is important while treating patients with lung cancer.

A Multidisciplinary Approach for Patients with Preexisting Lung Diseases and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicities

This commentary outlines the strategy employed by a multidisciplinary immune‐related toxicity team to evaluate patients who may be at high risk for the development of immune‐related toxicity, in particular, those with preexisting lung conditions and subsequent immune‐related pneumonitis.

Characterization of tumour mutation burden in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The efficacy expectation of immune checkpoint inhibitors against NSCLC in patients with ILD seems to be high because these populations are supposed to have high TMB. However, information about the characterization of TMB in patients with NSCLC and ILD is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate TMB in samples of NSCLC with ILD and clarify factors that influence TMB values.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with NSCLC who underwent thoracic surgery at our institution between January 2014 and January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Whole-exome sequencing with an Ion Proton system and gene expression profiling of fresh surgical specimens were performed.

RESULTS

Among 367 patients with NSCLC, 62 (16.9%) were diagnosed with ILD. All samples were collected from primary tumours with a median TMB of approximately 2.1 (range: 0.1-64.4) mutation/Mb. Among 81 squamous cell carcinomas, we compared 27 tumours with concomitant ILD and 54 tumours without ILD. Univariate analyses revealed that tumours with concomitant ILD showed lower TMB values than those without ILD. Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant ILD was significantly associated with low TMB values. Conversely, no difference was noted in the TMB value of adenocarcinoma between patients with and without ILD.

CONCLUSION

Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with ILD do not have high TMB values. Therefore, considering the risk of severe pneumonitis, immune checkpoint inhibitors should not be used routinely against patients with NSCLC and ILD based on the expectation of high TMB values.

[A CASE OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA THAT ONCE NIVOLUMAB HAD BEEN EFFECTIVE IN METASTATIC LESION AND MADE PRIMARY TUMOR RESECTABLE]

A 70-year-old woman, with an 8 cm tumor in the left kidney and multiple lung tumor and was diagnosed with Renal Cell Carcinoma (cT3aN0M1). The kidney tumor were unresectable and we started treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, temsirolimus), but they failed because of disease progression or adverse events. We used nivolumab for 5^th line treatment; then, interstitial pneumonia was observed. The renal tumor shrunk and pulmonary metastatic foci revealed prominent disappearance. The renal tumor became resectable and we tried nephrectomy. Pathological findings were clear cell carcinoma with marked necrosis, hyperplasia and internal bleeding.

A phase II study of atezolizumab for pretreated advanced/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: rationale and design for the TORG1936/AMBITIOUS study

Background:

Approximately 10% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are complicated with comorbid interstitial pneumonia (IP) with a poor prognosis. The pharmacotherapy for advanced lung cancer occasionally induces fatal acute exacerbation of pre-existing IP. Due to the lack of prospective studies, there is an urgent need to establish a safe and effective pharmacotherapy, especially for second-line or later settings. Atezolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 antibody, is thought to be the safest candidate for second-line therapy among various immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, compared with patients without IP, the patients with comorbid IP may have higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) or microsatellite instability (MSI), which are partly associated with a more favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Methods:

The Thoracic Oncology Research Group 1936/AMBITIOUS study is an ongoing, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab for pretreated advanced/recurrent patients with NSCLC complicated with idiopathic, chronic fibrotic IP with a forced vital capacity of >70%. The patients will receive atezolizumab (1200 mg, day 1) every 3 weeks until the discontinuation criteria are met. The primary end point of this study is the 1-year survival rate, and a sample size of 38 patients is set. As a translational research, we will perform the analysis of TMB, somatic mutations, and MSI for nucleic acids extracted from archival tumor samples.

Discussion:

Since there is no standard second-line or later therapy of advanced NSCLC with IP, the results of this study are expected to have a major impact on clinical practice.

Trial registration:

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190084, registered 26 August 2019 - retrospectively registered, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031190084

[A Review of Drug Therapy of Lung Cancer with Interstitial Lung Disease]

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a risk factor for lung cancer. Patients with lung cancer associated with ILD (LC-ILD) often appear clinically. During the treatment of LC-ILD, there is a risk of causing acute exacerbation or even death in the treatment of lung cancer. At the same time, combining ILD has become the exclusion criteria for prospective clinical trials of most lung cancers. Therefore, when lung cancer is combined with ILD, it often becomes a difficult point for the treatment of lung cancer. Because LC-ILD patients have a certain proportion in the clinic, it is necessary to explore the best treatment options. Here we review the results of existing clinical studies for reference.

PD-1 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer patients with special issues: Real-world evidence

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have provided new therapeutic options for non‐small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients. However, due to concerning increases in immune‐related adverse events, clinical trials usually exclude patients with special issues such as viral hepatitis, tuberculosis (Tbc), interstitial lung disease (ILD) and autoimmune disease.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of NSCLC patients who received ICIs, and analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with special issues.

Results

Between January 2015 and October 2018, 237 patients received ICIs. Of these patients, 26% (61/237) had special issues: 32 had hepatitis B viral (HBV) infections, 20 Tbc, six ILD, one HIV infection, one Behçet's disease and a past HBV infection, and one rheumatoid arthritis. The incidence of hepatitis tended to be higher in patients with HBV infections than in those without (18.8% vs 8.91%, P = .082). Severe hepatitis (grade 3 or higher) was more common in HBV‐infected patients (12.5% vs 1.9%, P = .0021), but the AEs were well‐managed. During ICI treatment, three of the 20 patients with a history of pulmonary Tbc developed active pulmonary Tbc, considered reactivations. No aggravation of ILD was noted. One RA patient experienced a disease flare and was treated with a low‐dose steroid. There was no significant difference in the overall response rate or progression‐free survival between patients with and without special issues.

Conclusion

Given the relatively low incidence of immune‐related AEs and the comparability of clinical outcomes, ICIs can be treatment option of NSCLC patients with special issues.

Managing Lung Cancer with Comorbid Interstitial Pneumonia

Systemic therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically changed in the latest 15 years. Molecular-targeted therapy has brought about an era of precision medicine, and immune checkpoint inhibitors have brought hope for a cure for advanced NSCLC. In the wake of this remarkable advancement, lung cancer with comorbid interstitial pneumonia (IP) has been completely left behind, as most clinical trials exclude patients with comorbid IP. IP, especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), is often accompanied by lung cancer, and acute exacerbation can develop during various cancer therapies, including surgery, radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy. In this review, we focus on the clinical questions concerning pharmacotherapy in cases of advanced lung cancer with comorbid IP and discuss what we can do with the currently available data.

Association of immune-related pneumonitis with the presence of preexisting interstitial lung disease in patients with non-small lung cancer receiving anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody

The safety of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody for patients with preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dependence of preexisting ILD on anti-PD-1 antibody-induced pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We retrospectively reviewed the association of preexisting ILD with the incidence, radiographic pattern, and outcome of pneumonitis in NSCLC patients receiving anti-PD-1 antibody. A total of 331 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 17 had preexisting ILD. The incidence of pneumonitis was higher among the patients with preexisting ILD than among those without preexisting ILD (29% vs. 10%, P = 0.027). The distributions of the CT appearances at the onset of anti-PD-1 antibody-induced pneumonitis were as follows: for the patients with preexisting ILD, two patients (40%) had diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), one patient each with organizing pneumonia-like (OP), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and other patterns (20% each); for the patients without preexisting ILD, 19 patients (61%) had OP, 8 (26%) had HP, 3 (10%) had DAD, and 1 (3.2%) had other patterns. The median onset time from the initiation of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment until the development of pneumonitis was 1.3 months (range 0.3-2.1 months) for the patients with preexisting ILD and 2.3 months (range 0.2-14.6 months) for the patients without preexisting ILD. Careful attention to the development of pneumonitis is needed, especially within the first 3 months after the start of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment, when using anti-PD-1 antibody to treat patients with preexisting ILD.

The utility of ground-glass attenuation score for anticancer treatment-related acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease among lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbation (AE) of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a fatal adverse event in the treatment of lung cancer patients with ILD. The value of pre-treatment radiological findings obtained by high-resolution computed tomography for the detection of anticancer treatment-related AE of ILD has not been established.

METHODS

Two medical record-based retrospective studies were performed. The chemotherapy cohort included 105 lung cancer patients with ILD who received chemotherapy at Tokyo Medical and Dental University between October 2008 and December 2017. The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cohort included 48 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with ILD treated with ICIs at nine institutions between January 2016 and September 2018. Variables were compared between AE-positive and -negative groups. Candidate variables were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Anticancer treatment-related AE of ILD occurred in 12 patients (11.4%) in the chemotherapy cohort and seven patients (14.5%) in the ICI cohort. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, ground-glass attenuation (GGA) score was the only factor significantly associated with the development of AE of ILD in both cohorts (P = 0.037 and 0.01 in the chemotherapy and ICI cohorts, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of GGA may help predict anticancer treatment-related AE of ILD.

Chlorin e6-Conjugated and PEGylated Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Nanocomposites for Pulmonary Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Here we demonstrate theranostic immune checkpoint inhibitor nanocomposites (ICI NC) having an improved tumor targeting ability in pulmonary metastatic colon cancer model. Atezolizumab, a PD-L1 antibody, was conjugated with methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (MePEG) and chlorin e6 (Ce6) via cathepsin-B-sensitive peptide as a linkage (named as ICI nanocomposites, ICI NC). This ICI NC is delivered to tumor sites enriched with tumor-specific enzymes such as cathepsin B, whereas undesired ICI exposure to normal tissue is avoided. When ICI NC were incubated with cathepsin B, Ce6 was released from ICI NC with increased fluorescence intensity in cathepsin B dose-dependent manner, which was by degradation of the peptide and then liberated Ce6 was activated in the aqueous solution. In animal pulmonary metastasis model using CT26 cells, ICI NC showed superior tumor targetability, i.e., fluorescence intensity was significantly strong in the mouse lung having metastatic tumor. On the contrary, cathepsin-B-deficient carriers such as atezolizumab-Ce6 conjugates or atezolizumab-Ce6/MePEG conjugates showed strong fluorescence intensity in the liver as well as lung. Our proposed ICI NC may be used for theranostic cancer therapy with superior tumor specificity of releasing ICI and Ce6 into tumor microenvironment, thereby showing an efficient inhibitory effect on pulmonary metastasis of CT26 cells.

Management of pulmonary toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immunotherapy has become a standard of care in oncology, following the recent approvals of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 and programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, bladder, head and neck cancers. Besides their efficacy, these agents also generate specific immune-related adverse events. Due to the increasing prescription of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune toxicity will continue to rise. The awareness of immune-related adverse events is key to ensuring both diagnosis and management of the possible serious adverse events. Although severe immune-related adverse events remain rare, they can lead to discontinued treatment or to death if they are not forecasted and managed properly. Even if lung toxicity is not the most frequent adverse event, it remains critical as it can be life-threatening. Herein, the main aspects of pulmonary toxicity are reviewed and guidelines are also proposed in order to manage the possible side-effects.

Immune-related lung toxicity can be life-threatening. Early recognition and management including CT scan and bronchoscopy should be encouraged. Treatment mainly relies on steroids. In addition, re-challenge should be discussed in multidisciplinary boards.http://bit.ly/2WNYH8I

Pulmonary complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P) during cancer treatment is rarely observed (<5%). ICI-P is more often observed in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than in those with other cancers. Likewise, it is more common in those receiving programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-1 ligand inhibitors rather than cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 inhibitors alone. The frequency of ICI-P is higher when anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 are administered concomitantly. Despite the low fatality rate (≈13%), ICI-P is the leading cause of ICI-related deaths. This narrative review focuses on the epidemiology, clinical and radiological presentation and prognosis of ICI-P occurring in patients, especially those with advanced NSCLC. Emphasis is placed on the differences in terms of frequency or clinical picture observed depending on whether the ICI is used as monotherapy or in combination with another ICI or chemotherapy. Other pulmonary complications observed in cancer patients, yet not necessarily immune-related, are reviewed, such as sarcoid-like granulomatosis, tuberculosis or other infections. A proposal for pragmatic management, including differential diagnosis and therapeutic strategies, is presented, based on the ICI-P series reported in the literature and published guidelines.

Immune Checkpoints as Promising Targets for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis?

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a rare, progressive and fatal lung disease which affects approximately 5 million persons worldwide. Although pirfenidone and/or nintedanib treatment improves patients’ wellbeing, the prognosis of IPF remains poor with 5-year mortality rates still ranging from 70 to 80%. The promise of the anti-cancer agent nintedanib in IPF, in combination with the recent notion that IPF shares several pathogenic pathways with cancer, raised hope that immune checkpoint inhibitors, the novel revolutionary anticancer agents, could also be the eagerly awaited ground-breaking and unconventional novel treatment modality limiting IPF-related morbidity/mortality. In the current review, we analyse the available literature on immune checkpoint proteins in IPF to explore whether immune checkpoint inhibition may be as promising in IPF as it is in cancer. We conclude that despite several promising papers showing that inhibiting specific immune checkpoint proteins limits pulmonary fibrosis, overall the data seem to argue against a general role of immune checkpoint inhibition in IPF and suggest that only PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition may be beneficial.