Disparity in clinical outcomes between pure and combined pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective study

Combined large‑cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small‑cell lung cancer: A case report

Combined large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is extremely rare, with only a few reports available in the literature. An accurate diagnosis is difficult to make due to the overlapping clinical features between LCNEC and SCLC, and a standardized treatment option is lacking. A 53-year-old female patient was admitted to Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Hangzhou, China) due to symptoms of dyspnea and phlegm, with blood in the sputum. Computed tomography revealed a 52×32×26-mm irregular soft-tissue mass in the left upper lung. Pathological examination of the biopsy specimen showed a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with compression injury, consistent with a mixed type of large and small cell carcinoma. The patient was administered chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy, and as of October 2023, the patient had a survival period of 29 months. LCNEC combined with SCLC is a sporadic tumor with a high potential for malignancy. Multidisciplinary treatment and close follow-up are recommended. The multidisciplinary treatment strategy used in the present study is expected to help inform future therapeutic decisions.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: A single‑institution experience

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and highly invasive lung cancer subtype with an overall poor prognosis. Due to its low incidence rate and unusual pathological features, the clinical management of LCNEC remains controversial. The present study aimed to assess the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on treatment response and survival outcomes in patients with advanced LCNEC. The clinical data from 148 patients with LCNEC treated with ICIs at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) between January 2019 and September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between clinicopathological variables and patient outcomes. Patients treated with ICIs demonstrated extended median overall survival (mOS) times [23.5 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 18.524-28.476] compared with patients who did not receive ICIs (11.2 months; 95% CI, 4.530-18.930) (P<0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that histological subtype (P=0.043), lymph node metastases (P=0.032) and number of metastatic organs (P=0.009) were associated with a poor prognosis. The heterogeneity of pathological components was associated with prognosis, and the mOS time was shorter for mixed LCNEC than that for pure LCNEC (P=0.043). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) (9.78 vs. 9.37 months; P=0.82) and mOS (20.70 vs. 25.79 months; P=0.181) times showed no significant association with regard to different regimens of immuno-based combination therapy (chemotherapy combined with ICIs vs. anti-angiogenic agents combined with ICIs). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (P=0.04), multiple organ metastases (P=0.02) and high cancer antigen 125 levels (P=0.01) were independent risk factors of a poor prognosis. The present findings offer valuable insights into potential prognostic markers and highlight the favorable impact of ICIs on OS in advanced LCNEC. Prospective clinical studies are required to validate the therapeutic value of ICIs in LCNEC.

The outcomes of different regimens depend on the molecular subtypes of pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND

The optimal systemic treatment for pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remains controversial, and recent advances in LCNEC molecular subtype classification have provided potential strategies for assisting in treatment decisions. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of treatment regimens, molecular subtypes and their concordance on clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with LCNEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients diagnosed with advanced pulmonary LCNEC in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) between January 2000 and October 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The tumor samples were collected and sequenced using a tumor-specific gene panel, while clinical information was retrieved from the medical records system. The survival and therapeutic response were analyzed and compared between different subgroups classified by treatment regimen (SCLC or NSCLC-based), molecular subtype (type I or II) or the combination.

RESULTS

In univariate subgroup analysis categorized only by treatment regimen or molecular subtype, there were no differences identified in DCR, ORR, PFS, or OS. Nevertheless, the group with consistent treatment regimen and molecular subtype exhibited significantly longer OS than that of the inconsistent group (median OS 37.7 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.046). Particularly, the OS of patients with type II LCNEC treated with SCLC-based regimen was significantly prolonged than that of others (median 37.7 vs. 10.5 months; p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our study revealed the clinical outcomes of different treatment regimens for LCNEC patients highly depend on their molecular subtypes, highlighting the need for sequencing-guided therapy.

Adapting Nanopore Sequencing Basecalling Models for Modification Detection via Incremental Learning and Anomaly Detection

We leverage machine learning approaches to adapt nanopore sequencing basecallers for nucleotide modification detection. We first apply the incremental learning technique to improve the basecalling of modification-rich sequences, which are usually of high biological interests. With sequence backbones resolved, we further run anomaly detection on individual nucleotides to determine their modification status. By this means, our pipeline promises the single-molecule, single-nucleotide and sequence context-free detection of modifications. We benchmark the pipeline using control oligos, further apply it in the basecalling of densely-modified yeast tRNAs and E.coli genomic DNAs, the cross-species detection of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in mammalian mRNAs, and the simultaneous detection of N1-methyladenosine (m1A) and m6A in human mRNAs. Our IL-AD workflow is available at: https://github.com/wangziyuan66/IL-AD.

Exploring the molecular features and genetic prognostic factors of pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas

Molecular research on large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has progressed significantly. However, there are still fewer molecular markers related to prognostic/therapeutic strategies for these conditions compared to those for adenocarcinoma. We therefore investigated the molecular characteristics of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). We enrolled patients surgically diagnosed with NECs between 2011 and 2019, with complete follow-up records. All were analyzed using whole exome sequencing and p53/Rb immunohistochemistry (IHC). A total of 92 cases, comprising 45 pure SCLC, 15 combined SCLC, 27 pure LCNEC, and 5 combined LCNEC, were included. TP53 (78.3%) and RB1 (34.8%) were the most common molecular alterations, followed by KMT2D, LRP1B, FAT3, NCOR2, SPTA1, and NOTCH1. The mutation frequency for EGFR was 10.9%. Sixteen patients with LCNEC who had TP53/RB1 co-alterations were SCLC-like, while the remaining were NSCLC-like. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding overall survival (OS; p = 0.458) and progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.157). The frequency of the loss of Rb expression by IHC in SCLC-like LCNEC was 100%. Significant pathway alterations unique to SCLC included Notch and AMPK, while HIF-1 was enriched exclusively in LCNEC. NCOR2 mutation was linked to worse OS (p = 0.029) and PFS (p = 0.015), while wild-type SPTA1 was associated with poor PFS (p = 0.018). IHC for Rb was reliable for predicting LCNEC molecular subtypes, indicating its clinical value. NCOR2 and SPTA1 alterations were identified as prognostic factors that may provide therapeutic targets for patients with NEC.

Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (C-LCNEC) has a poor prognosis and there is no consensus about the treatment regimen for both LCNEC and C-LCNEC patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 47-year-old female who received surgical resection. The postoperative histology and staging of the tumor suggested C-LCNEC with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and T2aN0M0 stage IB. Next-generation sequencing test showed KIF5B/RET fusion mutation without EGFR, ALK, RB1, and TP53 alterations. Adjuvant chemotherapy with 4-cycle docetaxel plus carboplatin was given and brain metastasis occurred after 10 months.

CONCLUSIONS

C-LCNEC with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma is rare and highly aggressive cancer. Surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with SCLC regimen may improve the disease-free survival and overall survival. The accumulation of similar cases will clarify the profile and management of the disease.

The prognosis analysis of organ metastatic patterns in lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A population-based study

Lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. This study was designed to depict patterns of distant organ metastatic and to analyze prognosis of LCNEC patients. We gathered data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. We conducted the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate overall survival (OS) and compare different variables. Cox proportional hazards regression models in univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to further explore prognostic factors. A total of 1335 LCNEC patients were eventually selected from the SEER database, of which 348 patients (26.0%) had single organ metastasis and 197 patients (14.8%) had multiple metastases. Our study indicates that patients with single organ metastasis generally have a poor prognosis, with a median OS of 8 months for both lung and brain metastasis with 1-year survival rates of 33% and 29% respectively. Patients with multiple metastases exhibited the worst prognosis, with a median OS of only 4 months and a 1-year OS of 8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy and radiation in metastatic patients were independently associated with OS. In conclusion, LCNEC exhibits a high metastatic rate when diagnosed. The most common metastatic organ is the brain in single-site metastatic patients. Patients with single or multiple metastases exhibit a significantly worse prognosis than those with non-organ metastases. In the group of single organ metastases, patients with brain and lung metastases had a better prognosis than those with bone and liver metastases.

Pulmonary Combined Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Pulmonary combined large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (CLCNEC) is a rare neuroendocrine tumor pertained to lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis generally. The clinical features of CLCNEC are not specific including cough, expectoration, chest distress, chest pain, etc., which are prone to have different manifestations of the mixed components. Owing to the low incidence, there are few related small-scale retrospective studies and case reports. Currently, the treatment regimen of CLCNEC mainly refers to LCNEC that complete surgical resection is preferred in the early stage and according to previous researches, platinum-based small cell lung cancer (SCLC) standard treatment regimen showed promising results in postoperative and advanced CLCNEC as compared to that of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Adenocarcinoma-CLCNEC more likely harbor driver gene mutation, and may benefit from targeted therapy. As for immunotherapy, more clinical trial data are needed to support its benefits. This article will fill the gap and will provide new insight into the clinical characteristics, pathological diagnosis and treatment endeavors of CLCNEC.

Prognostic significance of YAP1 expression and its association with neuroendocrine markers in resected pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC)

•

It is the first study to determine the prognostic relevance of YAP1 in pulmonary LCNEC. And we found YAP1 is a prognostic factor for worse survival, especially for DFS.

•

We investigated the relationship between YAP1 and NE markers (INSM1, DLL3, NeuroD1) and found that YAP1 expression was negatively correlated with INSM1 and DLL3, but not significantly correlated with NeuroD1.

•

Our sample size is large and the clinical data is complete.

•

The exploration of the prognostic mechanism of LCNEC is of great significance to its subtype classification and stratification of treatment and prognosis.

Background

YAP1 (Yes-associated protein 1), an important effector of the Hippo pathway, acts as an oncogene and is overexpressed in various malignant tumors. However, the function and expression pattern of YAP1 in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) have not been systematically established. This study aimed to explore the relationship between YAP1 expression and neuroendocrine differentiation markers and their prognostic significance in LCNEC.

Materials and methods

YAP1 protein and neuroendocrine markers (INSM1, NeuroD1 and DLL3) expression were examined by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in 80 resected pulmonary LCNEC cases. The possible association between these markers and clinicopathological features was evaluated and survival analyses were performed.

Results

YAP1 was highly expressed in 25% LCNECs (20/80) , especially at a relatively higher T stage (p = 0.015). YAP1 expression was negatively correlated with INSM1 (χ²=11.53, p = 0.001) and DLL3(χ²=8.55, p = 0.004), but not with NeuroD1 (p = 0.482). For survival analyses, YAP1 expression was associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (median DFS: 13 months vs. not reached (NR), p = 0.0096; median OS: not reached, NR vs. NR, p = 0.038), and was an unfavorable prognostic factor for DFS (HR:3.285; 95%CI: 1.526-7.071, p = 0.002) and OS (HR: 2.864, 95% CI: 0.932-8.796, p = 0.066).

Conclusions

YAP1 was found to be conversely correlated with neuroendocrine markers and a prognostic factor for worse survival in resected LCNEC patients, and mechanisms need to be further investigated.

Different Characteristics and Survival between Surgically Resected Pure and Combined Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. Little is known about the differences between the pure and combined LCNEC subtypes, and thus we conducted this study to provide more comprehensive insight into LCNEC.

METHODS

We reviewed 221 patients with pure LCNEC (P-LCNEC) and 120 patients with combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) who underwent pulmonary surgery in our hospital to compare their clinical features, driven genes' status (EGFR/ALK/ROS1/KRAS/BRAF), and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

The P-LCNEC group included a higher proportion of males and smokers than the C-LCNEC group. Furthermore, the C-LCNEC group had higher incidences of visceral pleural invasion (VPI), EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement compared with the P-LCNEC group. Expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56, CGA, and SYN) and recurrence patterns were not significantly different between the two groups. The P-LCNEC group had better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with the C-LCNEC group (median DFS: 67.0 vs. 28.1 months, p = 0.021; median OS: 72.0 vs. 45.0 months, p = 0.001), which was further confirmed by the PSM method (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Adjuvant chemotherapy was also an independent factor for DFS and OS. Subgroup analysis found that regardless of whether it was for the entire LCNEC group or the P- and C-LCNEC subtypes, the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) regimens presented with superior survival compared with the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regimens.

CONCLUSION

P-LCNEC was associated with more favorable prognosis compared with C-LCNEC. SCLC-based adjuvant chemotherapy was more appropriate for LCNEC patients than NSCLC-based regimens, regardless of whether they were the pure or combined LCNEC subtypes. C-LCNEC patients may be the potential beneficiary of targeted therapy.

Survival After Lobectomy vs. Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Population-Based Study

Objective

Due to the low incidence of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), the survival analysis for comparing lobectomy and sublobar resection (SLR) for stage IA LCNEC remains scarce.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with pathological stage IA LCNEC between 1998 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The oncological outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox multivariate analysis were used to identify the independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. Furthermore, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between SLR and lobectomy to adjust the confounding factors.

Results

A total of 308 patients with stage IA LCNEC met the inclusion criteria: 229 patients (74.4%) received lobectomy and 79 patients (25.6%) received SLR. Patients who underwent SLR were older (P < 0.001), had smaller tumor size (P = 0.010), and less lymph nodes dissection (P < 0.001). The 5-year CSS and OS rates were 56.5 and 42.9% for SLR, and 67.8 and 55.7% for lobectomy, respectively (P = 0.037 and 0.019, respectively). However, multivariate analysis did not identify any differences between the SLR group and lobectomy group in CSS (P = 0.135) and OS (P = 0.285); and the PSM also supported these results. In addition, the age at diagnosis and laterality of tumor were identified as significant predictors for CSS and OS, whereas the number of lymph nodes dissection was a significant predictor for CSS.

Conclusions

Although SLR is not inferior to lobectomy in terms of oncological outcomes for patients with stage IA LCNEC, more lymph nodes can be dissected or sampled during lobectomy. Lobectomy should still be considered as a standard procedure for patients with early-stage LCNEC who are able to withstand lobectomy.

In-depth molecular analysis of combined and co-primary pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma

Up to 14% of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) are diagnosed in continuity with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. In addition to these combined lesions, 1% to 7% of lung tumors present as co-primary tumors with multiple synchronous lesions. We evaluated molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of combined and co-primary LCNEC-adenocarcinoma (ADC) tumors. Ten patients with LCNEC-ADC (combined) and five patients with multiple synchronous ipsilateral LCNEC and ADC tumors (co-primary) were included. DNA was isolated from distinct tumor parts, and 65 cancer genes were analyzed by next generation sequencing. Immunohistochemistry was performed including neuroendocrine markers, pRb, Ascl1 and Rest. Pure ADC (N = 37) and LCNEC (N = 17) cases were used for reference. At least 1 shared mutation, indicating tumor clonality, was found in LCNEC- and ADC-parts of 10/10 combined tumors but only in 1/5 co-primary tumors. A range of identical mutations was observed in both parts of combined tumors: 8/10 contained ADC-related (EGFR/KRAS/STK11 and/or KEAP1), 4/10 RB1 and 9/10 TP53 mutations. Loss of pRb IHC was observed in 6/10 LCNEC- and 4/10 ADC-parts. The number and intensity of expression of Ascl1 and neuroendocrine markers increased from pure ADC (low) to combined ADC (intermediate) and combined and pure LCNEC (high). The opposite was true for Rest expression. In conclusion, all combined LCNEC-ADC tumors were clonally related indicating a common origin. A relatively high frequency of pRb inactivation was observed in both LCNEC- and ADC-parts, suggesting an underlying role in LCNEC-ADC development. Furthermore, neuroendocrine differentiation might be modulated by Ascl1(+) and Rest(-) expression.

A Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Patients: A Population-Based Study

Purpose

This study was designed to construct and validate a nomogram that was available for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

Patients and Methods

Using the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified patients pathologically diagnosed as LCNEC from 1975 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was conducted to assess prognostic factors of CSS. A novel nomogram model was constructed and validated by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

A total of 624 LCNEC patients were enrolled. Five prognostic factors for CSS were identified and merged to establish nomograms. In the training and validation cohorts, calibration curves displayed the nomogram predictions are in a good agreement with the actual survival. The C-Index of the training and validation cohorts were both higher than 0.8, and the DCA results showed that the nomogram has clinical validity and utility.

Conclusion

The proposed nomogram resulted in accurate CSS prognostic prediction for patients with LCNEC.

A Novel Strategy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumor

Correctly diagnosing a histologic type of lung cancer is important for selecting the appropriate treatment because the aggressiveness, chemotherapy regimen, surgical approach, and prognosis vary significantly among histologic types. Pulmonary NETs, which are characterized by neuroendocrine morphologies, represent approximately 20% of all lung cancers. In particular, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (small cell lung cancer and large cell neuroendocrine tumor) are highly proliferative cancers that have a poorer prognosis than other non-small cell lung cancers. The combination of hematoxylin and eosin staining, Ki-67, and immunostaining of classic neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A, CD56, and synaptophysin, are normally used to diagnose high-grade neuroendocrine tumors; however, they are frequently heterogeneous. This article reviews the diagnostic methods of lung cancer diagnosis focused on immunostaining. In particular, we describe the usefulness of immunostaining by Stathmin-1, which is a cytosolic phosphoprotein and a key regulator of cell division due to its microtubule depolymerization in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, for the diagnosis of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors.

Comparative Study of Pulmonary Combined Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Combined Small-Cell Carcinoma in Surgically Resected High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung

Objectives

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are both classified as pure and combined subtypes. Due to the low incidence and difficult diagnosis of combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) and combined SCLC (C-SCLC), few studies have compared their clinical features and prognosis.

Materials and Methods

We compared the clinical features, mutation status of driver genes (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, and BRAF), and prognosis between C-LCNEC and C-SCLC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied for survival analysis.

Results

We included a total of 116 patients with C-LCNEC and 76 patients with C-SCLC in the present study. There were significant differences in distribution of smoking history, tumor location, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), and combined components between C-LCNEC and C-SCLC (P<0.05 for all). C-SCLC was more advanced at diagnosis as compared to C-LCNEC. The incidence of EGFR mutations in C-LCNEC patients was higher than C-SCLC patients (25.7 vs. 5%, P=0.004). We found that tumor size, pN stage, peripheral CEA level, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently prognostic factors for DFS and OS in C-LCNEC patients, while peripheral NSE level, pT stage, pN stage, VPI and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with DFS and OS for C-SCLC patients (P<0.05 for all). Propensity score matching with adjustment for the confounders confirmed a more favorable DFS (P=0.032) and OS (P=0.019) in patients with C-LCNEC in comparison with C-SCLC patients upon survival analysis.

Conclusions

The mutation landscape of driver genes seemed to act in different way between C-SCLC and C-LCNEC, likely by which result in clinical phenotype difference as well as better outcome in C-LCNEC.

Management of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive cancer with a dismal prognosis. The majority of cases occur in the lung and the gastrointestinal tract; however, it can occur throughout the body. Recently advances in the understanding of the molecular underpinnings of this disease have paved the way for additional novel promising therapies. This review will discuss the current best evidence for management of LCNEC and new directions in the classification and treatment of this rare disease.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search for "Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma" and "High grade neuroendocrine carcinoma." All titles were screened for relevance to the management of LCNEC. Papers were included based on relevance to the management of LCNEC.

RESULTS

Papers were included reviewing both pulmonary and extra pulmonary LCNEC. We summarized the data driven best practices for the management of both early and advanced stage LCNEC. We describe emerging therapies with promising potential.

DISCUSSION

LCNEC are rare and aggressive neoplasms. In advanced disease, the historical regimen of platinum based therapy in combination with etoposide or irinotecan remains among the commonly used first line therapies, however for extra thoracic LCNEC regimens like FOLFOX, FOLFOIRI and CAPTEM can also be used. Further effective and safe treatment options are desperately needed. Recently, new advances including a new understanding of the genetic subcategories of LCNEC and immunotherapy agents may guide further treatments.

Survival outcomes of surgery in patients with pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a retrospective single-institution analysis and literature review

Background

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (pLCNEC) is a very rare malignancy originating from the lung and bronchus, and its biological behaviour, clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis are poorly understood. Thus, the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment-related prognostic factors of this rare disorder must be explored.

Results

The clinical data of 59 patients (48 males and 11 females) who were treated by surgery and diagnosed with pLCNEC by postoperative pathology at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from April 2004 to April 2019 were analysed retrospectively. The median patient age was 62 years (38–79 years), and the median duration of disease was 2 months (0.5–18 months). Compared with other lung malignancies, pLCNEC lacks specific clinical symptoms and imaging features, and preoperative biopsy pathology is often insufficient to confirm the diagnosis. The corresponding numbers of patients who were classified into stages I, II, III and IV according to the postoperative pathological tumour-nodal-metastasis stage were 25, 12, 15 and 7, respectively. The median overall survival was 36 months (0.9–61.1 months). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 76.3%, 49% and 44.7%, respectively. The tumour stage exerted a significant effect on survival (Cox multivariate analysis p < 0.05).

Conclusions

For patients with resectable pLCNEC, multidisciplinary therapy based on surgery may have good survival benefits, and tumour stage is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of pLCNEC.

Role of Immunotherapy in Stage IV Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung

Background:

Despite approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors in both small cell and non-small cell lung cancers, the role of immunotherapy in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) in lung is undefined.

Methods:

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), Stage IV lung LCNEC cases diagnosed from 2014 to 2016 were analyzed. Information regarding cancer treatment was limited to first course of therapy, including surgery for primary lesion, radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis.

Results:

Among 661 eligible cases, 37 patients were treated with immunotherapy. No significant association between use of immunotherapy and clinical demographics was observed except for use of chemotherapy (p=0.0008). Chemotherapy was administered in 34 (92%) and 406 (65%) in immunotherapy and non-immunotherapy groups, respectively. Use of immunotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (Log-rank p=0.0018). Landmark analysis in the immunotherapy group showed 12 and 18-month survivals of 34.0% and 29.1%, respectively, whereas those in the non-immunotherapy group were 24.1% and 15.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that female sex (HR=0.79, p=0.0063), liver metastases (HR=0.75, p=.0392), surgery (HR= 0.50, p<0.0001) use of chemotherapy (HR= 0.44, p<0.0001), and use of immunotherapy (HR=0.64, p=0.0164) had statistical significance. Propensity score matching in overall survival analysis showed a nonsignificant trend (p=0.0733) in favor of immunotherapy treatment.

Conclusion:

This retrospective study using NCDB suggests that use of immunotherapy may improve survival of LCNEC patients.

Ki-67 Index of 55% Distinguishes Two Groups of Bronchopulmonary Pure and Composite Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas with Distinct Prognosis

BACKGROUND

Little information is available concerning prognostic factors for bronchopulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (BP-LCNECs) and even less is known about combined LCNECs (Co-LCNECs). We investigated whether an integrated morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular approach could be used for their prognostic evaluation.

METHODS

Morphological (including combined features), proliferative (mitotic count/Ki-67 index), immunohistochemical (napsin A, p40, TTF-1, CD44, OTP, SSTR2A, SSTR5, mASH1, p53, RB1, and MDM2), and genomic (TP53, RB1, ATM, JAK2, KRAS, and STK11) findings were analyzed in BP-LCNECs from 5 Italian centers, and correlated with overall survival (OS). The Ki-67 index was expressed as the percentage of positive cells in hot spots as indicated in the WHO 2019 Digestive System Tumors and, for Co-LCNECs, the Ki-67 index was evaluated only in the LCNEC component.

RESULTS

A total of 111 LCNECs were distinguished into 70 pure LCNECs, 35 Co-LCNECs (27 with adenocarcinoma [ADC] and 8 with squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC]), and 6 LCNECs with only napsin A immunoreactivity. The Ki-67 index cutoff at 55% evaluated in the neuroendocrine component was the most powerful predictor of OS (log-rank p = 0.0001) in all LCNECs; 34 cases had a Ki-67 index <55% (LCNEC-A) and 77 had a Ki-67 index ≥55% (LCNEC-B). Statistically significant differences in OS (log-rank p = 0.0001) were also observed between pure and Co-LCNECs. A significant difference in OS was found between pure LCNECs-A and Co-LCNECs-A (p < 0.05) but not between pure LCNECs-B and Co-LCNECs-B. Co-LCNEC-ADC and LCNEC napsin A+ cases had longer OS than pure LCNEC and Co-LCNEC-SqCC cases (log-rank p = 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, tumor location, pure versus combined features, and napsin A, but no single gene mutation, were significantly associated with OS after adjustment for Ki-67 index and study center (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ki-67 proliferation index and the morphological characterization of combined features in LCNECs seem to be important tools for predicting clinical outcome in BP-LCNECs.

A Population-Based Systematic Clinical Analysis With a Single-Center Case Series of Patients With Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to conduct an updated systematic analysis of patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNC) in recent decades, concerning incidence and mortality trends, demographics, treatments, survival and death causes.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with PLCNC at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) between 2000 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were also retrieved. Frequencies and average annual age-adjusted rates (AAR) of PLCNC patients were calculated and analyzed by Joint-point regression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used for identifying prognostic factors. Predictive nomograms for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were developed and then validated by calculating C-index values and drawing calibration curves. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Causes of death were also analyzed by time latency.

RESULTS

A total of 56 PLCNC patients of the PUMCH cohort were included. Additionally, the PLCNC patients in the SEER database were also identified from different subsets. The AAR from 2001 to 2017 were 3.21 (95%CI: 3.12-3.30) per million. Its incidence and mortality rates in PLCNC patients increased at first but seemed to decline in recent years. Besides TNM stage and treatments, older age and male gender were independently associated with poorer survival, while marital status only affected CSS other than OS. The nomograms for OS and CSS presented great predictive ability and calibration performance. Surgery gave significantly more survival benefits to PLCNC patients, and chemotherapy might add survival benefits to stage II-IV. However, radiation therapy seemed to only improve stage III patients' survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supported some previous studies in terms of incidence, survival, and treatment options. The mortality rates seemed to decline recently, after an earlier increase. Among PLCNC patients, most of the deaths occurred within the first five years, while other non-PLCNC diseases increased after that. Thus, careful management and follow-up of other comorbidities are of equal importance. Our study may partly solve the dilemma caused by PLCNC's rarity and inspire more insights in future researches.

Clinical Features and Outcomes Analysis of Surgical Resected Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma With Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Objective

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of pulmonary cancer with poor survival. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for resected LCNEC is controversial till now; clinical features together with the prognostic factors in LCNEC should be clarified better.

Methods

Clinicopathological characteristics, driven genes’ status (EGFR, ALK, and ROS1), adjuvant chemotherapy strategy for 94 surgical resected LCNECs were extracted from digital database, tumor relapse or progression, and survival were analyzed with clinical profiles.

Results

Driven gene mutants were scarce in LCNEC, 8.3% (4/48) samples harbored EGFR mutations, 5.8% (3/52) with ALK positive, and none of ROS1 positive. A total of 44 patients suffered tumor relapse or progression during follow-up. Tumor/lymph node (N) stage, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level before surgery, different adjuvant chemotherapies were associated with tumor relapse (P < 0.05); poorer disease-free survival (DFS) appeared in N2/stage III, serum CEA positive and pemetrexed based chemotherapy (P < 0.05); for overall survival (OS) analysis, the T/tumor stage, serum positive CEA/neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at baseline were associated with worse OS (P < 0.05). Moreover, in the multivariate analysis, N stage still acted as prognostic for DFS (P = 0.019); OS differed significantly in different T stages, chemotherapy selection and serum CEA levels after adjustment (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Classical driven gene mutations were rare in LCNEC. Tumor N stage appeared as prognostic for DFS, while serum positive CEA, different adjuvant chemotherapy strategies, and T stage were independent prognostic factors for OS. Etoposide–platinum regime seemed to be a better choice which should be confirmed by further prospective investigations.

Challenges in Ki-67 assessments in pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas

AIMS

To gather the best available evidence regarding Ki-67% values in large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and determine whether certain cut-off values could serve as a prognostic feature in LCNEC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo, eSlide Manager and ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems) were used to measure Ki-67% in 77 resected LCNEC diagnosed by World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria. Cases were stratified into six classes by 10% Ki-67 increments. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, overall (OS) and disease-free survivals (DFS) were compared by AJCC stage, by six Ki-67% classes and with Ki-67% cut-points ≥20% and ≥40%. Tumours were from 0.9 to 11.5 cm and pathological stages 1-3. The system measured Ki-67% positivity using 4072-44 533 tumour nuclei per case (mean 16610 ± 8039). Ki-67% ranged from 1 to 64% (mean = 26%; median = 26%). Only 16 (21%) tumours had Ki-67% ≥40%. OS ranged from 1 to 298 months (median follow-up = 25 months). DFS ranged from 1 to 276 months (median follow-up = 9 months). OS and DFS differed across AJCC stage (overall log-rank P = 0.038 and P = 0.037). However, neither OS nor DFS significantly correlated with Ki-67% when six or two classes were used with either ≥20% Ki-67 or ≥40% Ki-67 as cut-point. A literature review identified 14 reports meeting our inclusion criteria with ≥10 LCNEC. Reported Ki-67% ranged from 2% to 100%. Problems contributing to variability in Ki-67% measurements are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings caution against a blanket use of 20%, 40% or other Ki-67% cut-points for LCNEC diagnosis or prognostication.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Achieved Complete Response for Drug-Sensitive EGFR/ALK Mutation-Negative Metastatic Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with High Tumor Mutation Burden: A Case Report

Large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (LCNELC) is classified into lung neuroendocrine tumors according to WHO 2015 classification guidelines and represents approximately 3% of all lung cancer. Because of the rarity of LCNELC, there is a lack of prospective studies guiding treatment. Here, we report a case of a patient with pT2aN2M0 stage IIIA LCNELC (drug-sensitive EGFR/ALK mutation-negative, PD-L1-negative but tumor mutation burden (TMB) high), who progressed rapidly after surgery but achieved a complete response to subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The concentration of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) following the treatment course strongly reflects the response to ICI therapy. This report highlights the efficacy of ICI treatment in metastatic LCNELC patients with a high TMB and suggests that ctDNA analysis in detecting molecular residual disease may facilitate the personalization of ICI therapy.

Deep Learning for the Classification of Small-Cell and Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Reliable entity subtyping is paramount for therapy stratification in lung cancer. Morphological evaluation remains the basis for entity subtyping and directs the application of additional methods such as immunohistochemistry (IHC). The decision of whether to perform IHC for subtyping is subjective, and access to IHC is not available worldwide. Thus, the application of additional methods to support morphological entity subtyping is desirable. Therefore, the ability of convolutional neuronal networks (CNNs) to classify the most common lung cancer subtypes, pulmonary adenocarcinoma (ADC), pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), was evaluated. A cohort of 80 ADC, 80 SqCC, 80 SCLC, and 30 skeletal muscle specimens was assembled; slides were scanned; tumor areas were annotated; image patches were extracted; and cases were randomly assigned to a training, validation or test set. Multiple CNN architectures (VGG16, InceptionV3, and InceptionResNetV2) were trained and optimized to classify the four entities. A quality control (QC) metric was established. An optimized InceptionV3 CNN architecture yielded the highest classification accuracy and was used for the classification of the test set. Image patch and patient-based CNN classification results were 95% and 100% in the test set after the application of strict QC. Misclassified cases mainly included ADC and SqCC. The QC metric identified cases that needed further IHC for definite entity subtyping. The study highlights the potential and limitations of CNN image classification models for tumor differentiation.

Long-term survivor of pulmonary combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with nivolumab

Several authors have previously reported that patients with pulmonary combined large cell neuroendocrine cancer ( LCNEC) have a poor prognosis and there is no consensus on the treatment strategy for combined LCNEC as well as LCNEC. Here, we report the case of a long‐term survivor with pulmonary combined LCNEC. The patient was a 60‐year‐old man who underwent thoracoscopic right lower lobectomy. The final histopathology and staging of the tumor showed LCNEC combined with squamous cell carcinoma and T2aN0M0 stage IB. Multimodality treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery for several recurrences were performed after the pulmonary surgery. After immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with nivolumab, all the metastatic lesions shrunk and a partial response was maintained at five years after the first surgery. In our case, ICI after multimodality therapy combining cytotoxic anticancer drugs and radiotherapy was effective in LCNEC with metachronous multiple metastases.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

Immune checkpoint inhibitor after multimodality therapy combining cytotoxic anticancer drugs and radiotherapy was effective in LCNEC with metachronous multiple metastases. The patient survived over five‐years after the first surgery.

What this study adds

Immune checkpoint inhibitor may be effective in some LCNEC patients.