The clinical efficacy of combinatorial therapy of EGFR-TKI and crizotinib in overcoming MET amplification-mediated resistance from prior EGFR-TKI therapy

Multicenter Real-World Analysis of Combined MET and EGFR Inhibition in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired MET Amplification or Polysomy After EGFR Inhibition

PURPOSE

MET amplification is a common resistance mechanism to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several trials showed encouraging results with combined EGFR and MET inhibition (EGFRi/METi). However, MET amplification has been inconsistently defined and frequently included both polysomy and true amplification.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, real-world analysis in patients with disease progression on EGFR inhibition and MET copy number gain (CNG), defined as either true amplification (MET to centromere of chromosome 7 ratio [MET-CEP7] ≥ 2) or polysomy (gene copy number ≥ 5, MET-CEP7 < 2).

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients with MET CNG were included, 42 of whom were detected by FISH. Twenty-three, 7, and 14 received EGFRi/METi, METi, and SoC, respectively. Patients in the EGFRi/METi cohort exhibited a superior real-world clinical benefit rate, defined as stable disease or better, of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60-95) compared to METi (29%, 4-71) and SoC (50%, 23-77). Median real-world progression-free survival was longer with EGFRi/METi with 9.8 vs. 4.3 months with METi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19, 95% CI, 0.06-0.57) and 3.7 months with SoC (0.41, 0.18-0.91), respectively. Overall survival was numerically improved. Interaction analysis with treatment and type of CNG (amplification vs. polysomy) suggests that differences were exclusively driven by MET-amplified patients receiving EGFRi/METi (HR for OS, 0.09, 0.01-0.54).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, EGFRi/METi showed clinical benefit over METi and SoC. Future studies should focus on the differential impact of the type of MET CNG with a focus on true MET amplification as predictor of response.

Unlocking c-MET: A comprehensive journey into targeted therapies for breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women, posing a formidable health challenge worldwide. In this complex landscape, the c-MET (cellular-mesenchymal epithelial transition factor) receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), also recognized as the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor (HGFR), emerges as a prominent protagonist, displaying overexpression in nearly 50% of breast cancer cases. Activation of c-MET by its ligand, HGF, secreted by neighboring mesenchymal cells, contributes to a cascade of tumorigenic processes, including cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, and immunosuppression. While c-MET inhibitors such as crizotinib, capmatinib, tepotinib and cabozantinib have garnered FDA approval for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), their potential within breast cancer therapy is still undetermined. This comprehensive review embarks on a journey through structural biology, multifaceted functions, and intricate signaling pathways orchestrated by c-MET across cancer types. Furthermore, we highlight the pivotal role of c-MET-targeted therapies in breast cancer, offering a clinical perspective on this promising avenue of intervention. In this pursuit, we strive to unravel the potential of c-MET as a beacon of hope in the fight against breast cancer, unveiling new horizons for therapeutic innovation.

Allelic Context of EGFR C797X-Mutant Lung Cancer Defines Four Subtypes With Heterogeneous Genomic Landscape and Distinct Clinical Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

EGFR C797X (C797S or C797G) mutation is the most frequent on-target mechanism of resistance to osimertinib. The hypothesis that the allelic context of C797X/T790M has implications for treatment is on the basis of sporadic reports and needs validation with larger cohorts.

METHODS

We identified patients with EGFR C797X-mutant NSCLC from nine centers who progressed on osimertinib, all analyzed in a single laboratory through next-generation sequencing. We analyzed genomic profiles and assessed associations between clinical outcomes and C797X status.

RESULTS

A total of 365 EGFR C797X-mutant cases were categorized into four subtypes on the basis of allelic context: in cis (75.3%), in trans (6.4%), cis&trans (10.4%), and C797X-only (7.9%). Genomically, the cis&trans subtype displayed the highest frequency of concurrent alterations at osimertinib resistance sites (21.1%), while the in cis subtype had the lowest (8.4%). Clinically, cis&trans patients exhibited the worst progression-free survival (PFS) on both previous (median 7.7 mo) and subsequent treatment (median 1.0 mo) and overall survival (median 3.9 mo). In subsequent treatments, in cis patients exhibited superior PFS with combined brigatinib and cetuximab (median 11.0 mo) compared with other regimens (p = 0.005), while in trans patients exhibited variable outcomes with combined first or second- and third-generation EGFR inhibitor (PFS range: 0.7-8.1 mo, median 2.6 mo). Notably, subtype switching was observed after subsequent treatments, predominantly toward the in cis subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Allelic context could define four EGFR C797X-mutant NSCLC subtypes with heterogeneous genetic landscapes and distinct clinical outcomes. Subsequent treatments further complicate the scenario through subtype switching.

Chemotherapy versus personalized therapy for EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a retrospective dual-center study

BACKGROUND

Advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients often develop resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), leaving uncertainties regarding subsequent treatment strategies. Although personalized therapy targeting individual acquired resistances (ARs) shows promise, its efficacy has not been systematically compared with platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy, a widely accepted treatment after EGFR-TKIs failure.

METHODS

A retrospective dual-center study was conducted involving patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutations who developed resistance to EGFR-TKIs between January 2017 and December 2022. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-1, normal organ function, and no prior chemotherapy. Patients were divided into the chemotherapy group (CG) or personalized therapy group (PG) based on the treatment received after disease progression. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients enrolled, there were 53 patients in the PG and 91 patients in the CG. The PG acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs through the MET amplification (27, 50%) and small cell lung cancer transformation (16, 30%) and 18% of them reported multiple resistance mechanisms. The ORR of the PG was similar to that of the CG (34% vs. 33%, P = 1.0) and the PFS of the PG patients was not statistically different from that of their CG counterparts [4.2 months (95% CI: 3.6-4.8 months) vs. 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.6-6.0 months), P = 0.77].

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy approximates to that of personalized therapy, which signifies that chemotherapy is still a reliable choice for patients who develop resistance to EGFR-TKIs and that further research is awaited to explore the benefit of personalized treatment.

Non-small cell lung cancer with MET amplification: review of epidemiology, associated disease characteristics, testing procedures, burden, and treatments

Introduction

Mesenchymal-epidermal transition factor gene amplification (METamp) is being investigated as a therapeutic target in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reviewed the epidemiology and disease characteristics associated with primary and secondary METamp, as well as the testing procedures used to identify METamp, in advanced NSCLC. Economic and humanistic burdens, and the practice patterns and treatments under investigation for METamp were also examined.

Methods

Embase and Medline (via ProQuest), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (2015-2022) were systematically searched. Conference abstracts were searched via Embase and conference proceedings websites (2020-2022). The review focused on evidence from the United States; global evidence was included for identified evidence gaps.

Results

The median rate of primary METamp in NSCLC across the references was 4.8% (n=4 studies) and of secondary METamp (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]-mutant NSCLC) was 15% (n=10). Next-generation sequencing (NGS; n=12) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; n=11) were most frequently used in real-world studies and FISH testing most frequently used in clinical trials (n=9/10). METamp definitions varied among clinical trials using ISH/FISH testing (MET to chromosome 7 centromere ratio of ≥1.8 to ≥3.0; or gene copy number [GCN] ≥5 to ≥10) and among trials using NGS (tissue testing: GCN ≥6; liquid biopsy: MET copy number ≥2.1 to >5). Limited to no data were identified on the economic and humanistic burdens, and real-world treatment of METamp NSCLC. Promising preliminary results from trials enrolling patients with EGFR-mutated, METamp advanced NSCLC progressing on an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were observed with MET-TKIs (i.e., tepotinib, savolitinib, and capmatinib) in combination with EGFR-TKIs (i.e., gefitinib and osimertinib). For metastatic NSCLC and high-level METamp, monotherapy with capmatinib, crizotinib, and tepotinib are recommended in the 2022 published NSCLC NCCN Guidelines.

Conclusion

Primary METamp occurs in approximately 5% of NSCLC cases, and secondary METamp in approximately 15% of cases previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor. Variability in testing methods (including ISH/FISH and NGS) and definitions were observed. Several treatments are promising in treating METamp NSCLC. Additional studies evaluating the clinical, economic, and humanistic burdens are needed.

Real-World Data on Combined EGFR-TKI and Crizotinib Treatment for Acquired and De Novo MET Amplification in Patients with Metastatic EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

Amplification of the mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) gene is a mechanism of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (TKIs) in over 20% of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated (EGFRm+) non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it may also occur de novo in 2-8% of EGFRm+ NSCLC cases as a potential mechanism of intrinsic resistance. These patients represent a group with unmet needs, since there is no standard therapy currently approved. Several new MET inhibitors are being investigated in clinical trials, but the results are awaited. Meanwhile, as an alternative strategy, combinations of EGFR-TKIs with the MET/ALK/ROS1-TKI Crizotinib may be used in this setting, despite this use is principally off-label. Thus, we studied five of these MET amplified cases receiving EGFR-TKI and Crizotinib doublet after progression on EGFR-TKI treatment to assess the benefits and challenges related to this combination and the possible occurrence of genomic and phenotypic co-alterations. Furthermore, we compared our cases with other real-world reports on Crizotinib/EGFR-TKI combinations, which appeared effective, especially in patients with high-level MET amplification. Yet, we observed that the co-occurrence of other genomic and phenotypical alterations may affect the response to combined EGFR-TKI and Crizotinib. Finally, given the heterogeneity of MET amplification, the diagnostic methods for assessing it may be discrepant. In this respect, we observed that for optimal detection, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and next-generation sequencing should be used together, as these methods possess different sensitivities and complement each other in characterizing MET amplification. Additionally, we addressed the issue of managing EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with de novo MET amplification causing primary EGFR-TKI resistance. We conclude that, while data from clinical trials with new MET inhibitors are still pending, adding Crizotinib to EGFR-TKI in NSCLC patients acquiring MET amplification at progression on EGFR-TKI monotherapy is a reasonable approach, with a progression-free survival of 3-19 months.

Osimertinib and Selpercatinib Efficacy, Safety, and Resistance in a Multicenter, Prospectively Treated Cohort of EGFR-Mutant and RET Fusion-Positive Lung Cancers

PURPOSE

Acquired RET fusions have been reported at resistance to treatment with EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, a multicenter cohort of patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers treated with osimertinib and selpercatinib for RET fusion-mediated osimertinib resistance has not previously been published.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who received selpercatinib in combination with osimertinib on a prospective expanded access clinical trial (NCT03906331) and single-patient compassionate use programs across five countries were centrally analyzed. All patients had advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC with a RET fusion detected from tissue or plasma following osimertinib therapy. Clinicopathologic and outcomes data were collected.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with EGFR-mutant and RET fusion-positive lung cancers who experienced prior progression on osimertinib received osimertinib and selpercatinib. EGFR exon 19 deletions (±T790M, 86%) and non-KIF5B fusions (CCDC6-RET 50%, NCOA4-RET 36%) predominated. Osimertinib 80 mg daily and selpercatinib 80 mg twice daily were the most commonly administered dosages. The response rate, disease control rate, and median treatment duration were 50% [95% confidence interval (CI), 25%-75%, n = 12], 83% (95% CI, 55%-95%), and 7.9 months (range, 0.8-25+), respectively. Resistance was complex, involving EGFR on-target (EGFR C797S), RET on-target (RET G810S), and off-target (EML4-ALK/STRN-ALK, KRAS G12S, BRAF V600E) mechanisms; RET fusion loss; or polyclonal mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with an acquired RET fusion as a mechanism of EGFR inhibitor resistance, the addition of selpercatinib to osimertinib was feasible and safe and offered clinical benefit, supporting the prospective evaluation of this combination. See related commentary by Krebs and Popat, p. 2951.

The Resistance to EGFR-TKIs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application of New Therapeutic Strategies

Almost 17% of Western patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. Del19 and L858R are the most-common ones; they are positive predictive factors for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Currently, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, is the standard first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutations. This drug is also administered as a second-line treatment for those patients with the T790M EGFR mutation and previously treated with first- (erlotinib, gefitinib) or second- (afatinib) generation TKIs. However, despite the high clinical efficacy, the prognosis remains severe due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGRF-TKIs. Various mechanisms of resistance have been reported including the activation of other signalling pathways, the development of secondary mutations, the alteration of the downstream pathways, and phenotypic transformation. However, further data are needed to achieve the goal of overcoming resistance to EGFR-TKIs, hence the necessity of discovering novel genetic targets and developing new-generation drugs. This review aimed to deepen the knowledge of intrinsic and acquired molecular mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-TKIs and the development of new therapeutic strategies to overcome TKIs' resistance.

Savolitinib versus crizotinib for treating MET positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The c-MET protein, encoded by the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) gene, can regulate cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Studies have shown that it is one of the essential driver genes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, several clinical studies have carried out objective assessments on the efficacy and safety of different types of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, direct cross-sectional comparisons between different agents are still not available.

METHODS

Our study was a single-center retrospective clinical study, which collected the data from MET positive NSCLC patients treated with MET TKIs at the Lung Cancer Center of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. We explored the efficacy and safety of crizotinib versus savolitinib in patients with METex14 skipping and MET amplification, separately.

RESULTS

Patients with METex14 skipping (median PFS = 10.7 months) had a better clinical response to MET TKIs than MET amplification patients (median PFS = 4.1 months). In the METex14 skipping subgroup, savolitinib did not show better survival benefit with significance than crizotinib (p > 0.05). In the MET amplification subgroup, savolitinib (median PFS = 7.1 months) demonstrated a better progression-free survival benefit than crizotinib (median PFS = 1.4 months), p = 0.05. The most common adverse effects of both MET TKIs were peripheral edema (41.2%), gastrointestinal reactions (23.5%), and liver injury (14.7%). The incidence rate of peripheral edema was higher in savolitinib than crizotinib.

CONCLUSION

In METex14 skipping NSCLC patients, the efficacy of savolitinib and crizotinib did not show significant difference. In MET amplification patients, savolitinib showed better efficacy than crizotinib.

Nanotechnology - a robust tool for fighting the challenges of drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Genomic and proteomic mutation analysis is the standard of care for selecting candidates for therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors against the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR TKI therapies) and further monitoring cancer treatment efficacy and cancer development. Acquired resistance due to various genetic aberrations is an unavoidable problem during EGFR TKI therapy, leading to the rapid exhaustion of standard molecularly targeted therapeutic options against mutant variants. Attacking multiple molecular targets within one or several signaling pathways by co-delivery of multiple agents is a viable strategy for overcoming and preventing resistance to EGFR TKIs. However, because of the difference in pharmacokinetics among agents, combined therapies may not effectively reach their targets. The obstacles regarding the simultaneous co-delivery of therapeutic agents at the site of action can be overcome using nanomedicine as a platform and nanotools as delivery agents. Precision oncology research to identify targetable biomarkers and optimize tumor homing agents, hand in hand with designing multifunctional and multistage nanocarriers that respond to the inherent heterogeneity of the tumors, may resolve the challenges of inadequate tumor localization, improve intracellular internalization, and bring advantages over conventional nanocarriers.

Recent Advances in Boosting EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors-Based Cancer Therapy

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a key role in signal transduction pathways associated with cell proliferation, growth, and survival. Its overexpression and aberrant activation in malignancy correlate with poor prognosis and short survival. Targeting inhibition of EGFR by small-molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is emerging as an important treatment model besides of chemotherapy, greatly reshaping the landscape of cancer therapy. However, they are still challenged by the off-targeted toxicity, relatively limited cancer types, and drug resistance after long-term therapy. In this review, we summarize the recent progress of oral, pulmonary, and injectable drug delivery systems for enhanced and targeting TKI delivery to tumors and reduced side effects. Importantly, EGFR-TKI-based combination therapies not only greatly broaden the applicable cancer types of EGFR-TKI but also significantly improve the anticancer effect. The mechanisms of TKI resistance are summarized, and current strategies to overcome TKI resistance as well as the application of TKI in reversing chemotherapy resistance are discussed. Finally, we provide a perspective on the future research of EGFR-TKI-based cancer therapy.

Osimertinib Resistance: Molecular Mechanisms and Emerging Treatment Options

The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein initiated the success story of targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, is currently indicated as first-line therapy in patients with NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutations, as second-line therapy in patients who present the resistance-associated mutation T790M after treatment with previous EGFR-TKIs, and as adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage resected NSCLC, harboring EGFR mutations. Despite durable responses in patients with advanced NSCLC, resistance to osimertinib, similar to other targeted therapies, inevitably develops. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance, including both EGFR-dependent and -independent molecular pathways, as well as their therapeutic potential, represents an unmet need in thoracic oncology. Interestingly, differential resistance mechanisms develop when osimertinib is administered in a first-line versus second-line setting, indicating the importance of selection pressure and clonal evolution of tumor cells. Standard therapeutic approaches after progression to osimertinib include other targeted therapies, when a targetable genetic alteration is detected, and cytotoxic chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic and immunotherapeutic agents. Deciphering the when and how to use immunotherapeutic agents in EGFR-positive NSCLC is a current challenge in clinical lung cancer research. Emerging treatment options after progression to osimertinib involve combinations of different therapeutic approaches and novel EGFR-TKI inhibitors. Research should also be focused on the standardization of liquid biopsies in order to facilitate the monitoring of molecular alterations after progression to osimertinib.

Impact of TP53 Mutations on EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Efficacy and Potential Treatment Strategy

BACKGROUND

We investigated the impact of factors that influence TP53 mutations on the efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and potential treatment strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumor samples were collected to screen gene mutations by next-generation sequencing, as well as the patients' baseline characteristics. The overall response to treatment with TKIs was evaluated based on interval computed tomography scans at each follow-up time point. A Fisher's exact test and log-rank test were used to determine the statistical differences in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 1134 clinical samples were collected from NSCLC patients, and TP53^mut was identified in 644 cases and EGFR^mut in 622 cases. A low frequency of TP53^mut or more than 50% EGFR co-mutation rate were related to the prognosis of TKI-treated patients. In addition, TP53^mut in the region outside of the DB domain had the strongest correlation with TKI resistance, whereas various types of mutations in the DB domain only had an impact on PFS. A grouping study of EGFR-TKI-based treatment revealed that EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy were associated with more significant survival benefits for patients with prognostic TP53^mut, whereas EGFR-TKI therapy was favorable for TP53^wt patients. Furthermore, TP53^mut could shorten the time to the relapse of postoperative patients, who will also likely respond well to EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Various characteristics of TP53^mut affect the prognosis of TKI-treated patients to varying degrees. EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy were benefit for patients' survival with prognostic TP53^mut, which provides an important reference for treatment management of EGFR^mut patients.

Phase 1 Study of the Selective c-MET Inhibitor, HS-10241, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Introduction

c-MET is an important therapeutic target for various cancers; however, the People's Republic of China currently retails only one specific c-MET inhibitor. Our preclinical study has revealed the high selectivity of HS-10241 to suppress c-MET. This phase 1 study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of the selective c-MET inhibitor (HS-10241) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors orally received a single or multiple dose of HS-10241 once daily or twice daily for 21 consecutive days, which included the following six regimens: 100 mg once daily, 200 mg once daily, 400 mg once daily, 600 mg once daily, 200 mg twice daily, and 300 mg twice daily. The treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or treatment termination. The primary end point was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity and maximal tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary end points included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.

Results

A total of 27 patients with advanced NSCLC received HS-10241, and dose-limiting toxicity was observed in three patients after 600 mg once-daily HS-10241 treatment. For once-daily dosing, MTD was 400 mg, and for twice-daily dosing, the maximal safe escalated dose was 300 mg, and MTD was not reached. Nausea (48.1%, 13 of 27), fatigue (37.0%, 10 of 27), and anemia (33.3%, 9 of 27) are the three most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events. At 400 mg once daily, C_ss,max was 5076 ng/mL and steady state area under the curve was 39,998 h × ng/mL. Patients (n = 5) with positive MET (MET exon 14-skipping, MET amplified, and MET immunohistochemistry 3+) had confirmed partial responses (n = 1) or stable disease (n = 3), with a disease control rate of 80.0%.

Conclusions

The selective c-MET inhibitor HS-10241 was well tolerated and had clinical activity in advanced NSCLC, especially in patients with positive MET. Furthermore, this study expounds on the therapeutic potential of HS-10241 in patients with cancer.

Therapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with osimertinib resistance

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the preferential options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. Osimertinib is a potent irreversible third-generation EGFR-TKI targeting EGFR mutations but has little effect on wild-type EGFR. In view of its remarkable efficacy and manageable safety, osimertinib was recommended as the standard first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. However, as the other EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib will inevitably develop acquired resistance, which limits its efficacy on the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. The etiology of triggering osimertinib resistance is complex including EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent pathways, and different therapeutic strategies for the NSCLC patients with osimertinib resistance have been developed. Herein, we comprehensively summarized the resistance mechanisms of osimertinib and discuss in detail the potential therapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients suffering osimertinib resistance for the sake of the improvement of survival and further achievement of precise medicine.

First-Line Osimertinib in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Effectiveness, Resistance Mechanisms, and Prognosis of Different Subsequent Treatments

BACKGROUND

Although the clinical application of osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been a new step forward in the first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), an increasing number of patients with progression on osimertinib represents a great challenge clinically. The patterns of resistance mechanisms and subsequent treatment strategies after first-line osimertinib resistance are not well established.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2016 and October 31, 2020, a consecutive of 56 EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients treated with osimertinib as first-line therapy at Daping Hospital (Chongqing, China) were retrospective screened. The samples of pre-osimertinib and osimertinib-resistance were all detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 23.0 software. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test between groups.

RESULTS

Among 47 patients with osimertinib effectiveness analysis, the median progression free survival (mPFS) was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.2-24.9 months), and median overall survival (mOS) was 35.5 months (95% CI: 23.9 months -NA). A total of 21 patients underwent repeated NGS tests upon osimertinib resistance. MET amplification was the most common resistance mechanism (6/21, 28.6%), followed by C797S mutation (5/21, 23.8%). A total of 15 patients received subsequent treatments, with mPFS of 7.3 months (95% CI 5.0 months -NA). Among them, 7 patients with EGFR C797 S or/and MET amplification received subsequent second-line targeted therapy, achieving mPFS of 7.3 months (95% CI 4.5 months -NA). Of note, 3 patients received immunotherapy as second- or third-line treatment after osimertinib resistance, achieving median clinical benefit of 37.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

MET amplification and C797S mutation are main resistance mechanisms, which could be targeted by crizotinib and gefitinib, respectively. More than 50% patients could receive subsequent anticancer targetable therapies after first-line osimertinib resistance. Immunotherapy may also be an acceptable choice after osimertinib resistance.

Association between EGFR gene mutant protein expression and T790M mutation after first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment resistance: a retrospective, single-arm clinical study

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is an important treatment for lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR gene mutations. The purpose of this study was to review the efficacy of first-generation EGFR-TKIs and the incidence of T790M after first-generation TKI resistance in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with positive EGFR gene mutation expression associated with EGFR mutant protein.

Methods

Tumor tissues were collected from stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR gene mutation who received first-generation EGFR-TKI targeted therapy. Patients were followed up through outpatient and inpatient systems. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of corresponding EGFR mutant protein in tumor tissues. The incidence of T790M mutation after first-generation TKI resistance and the correlation between the mutant protein and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-generation TKI treatment were investigated.

Results

T790M mutation rates were 37.93% (11/29) and 42.50% (17/40) in the EGFR mutation groups, respectively, after first-generation TKI treatment for drug resistance. In patients with exon 19 deletion, T790M mutations were found in 63.64% (7/11) of patients with positive protein expression and 22.22% (4/18) of patients with negative protein expression (P=0.026; χ²=4.974). The mutation rate of T790M after drug resistance in patients with L858R mutation was 53.57% (15/28) and 16.67% (2/12) in the protein expression-positive and negative groups, respectively (χ²=4.682, P=0.030). The variations were statistically significant.

Conclusions

After resistance to the first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment, the occurrence of T790M mutation may be related to the expression of EGFR mutant protein in patients with EGFR gene mutation.

Genotyping of cerebrospinal fluid in lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastasis

Background

The prognosis of non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is poor. Detection of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) by next generation sequencing (NGS) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may facilitate diagnosis of LM and identification of drug resistance mechanisms, yet its clinical use needs to be further verified.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the genetic profiles of paired CSF and plasma samples in lung cancer patients with LM. Of 17 patients screened, a total of 14 patients with LM and paired NGS tests were enrolled.

Results

All patients harbor driver gene mutations, including 12 epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations, 1 anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, and 1 ROS‐1 fusion. Genetic mutations were detected in CSF cfDNA from 92.9% patients (13/14), which was significantly higher than that from the plasma (9/14, 64.2%). The mutations were highly divergent between CSF and plasma cfDNA, with a concordance rate of 24.38% and 10 mutations shared by the two media. CSF cfDNA could also benefit the analysis of resistance mechanisms to targeted therapies. In five patients who experienced progression on 1st or 2nd generation EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), RB1 mutation, and amplification of MET and EGFR were detected in CSF cfDNA only. In eight patients with LM progression on osimertinib resistance, EGFR amplification was detected in CSF cfDNA from four patients, whereas no CNVs were detected in the matched plasma samples.

Conclusions

In conclusion, CSF could be superior to plasma in providing a more comprehensive genetic landscape of LM to find out drug resistance mechanisms and guide subsequent treatments.

WX-0593 combined with an epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody in the treatment of xenograft tumors carrying triple EGFR mutations

Background

To evaluate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of WX-0593, a newly developed potent anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, in combination with an epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (QL1203 or Vectibix) for the treatment of xenograft tumors carrying mutant EGFR and osimertinib-resistant mutations (EGFR/T790M/C797S).

Methods

The inhibition of tumor cell proliferation by WX-0593 and Vectibix alone or combined was evaluated in four EGFR triple-mutant cell lines: PC9 (EGFR Del19/T790M/C797S), NCI-H1975 (EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S), Ba/F3 (EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S and EGFR Del19/T790M/C797S). The in vivo antitumor efficacy of WX-0593 alone or combined with QL1203 or Vectibix was evaluated in xenograft tumor models of BALB/c nude mice developed from H1975 (EGFR-Del19/T790M/C797S) and Ba/F3 (EGFR-L858R/T790M/C797S) cell lines. Mice were randomized into groups and treated with or without WX-0593, QL1203, Vectibix, or their combination. The tumor volume, mouse body weight, and therapeutic side effects were monitored routinely. Blood samples were obtained from all mice at different time points after the last dosage of treatment to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs.

Results

WX-0593 and Vectibix showed a strong synergistic inhibitory effect on the proliferation of two EGFR triple-mutant Ba/F3 cell lines (EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S and Del19/T790M/C797S), but little synergistic inhibitory effect on the proliferation of NCI-H1975 (EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S) and PC9 (EGFR Del19/T790M/C797S). In vivo, WX-0593 (25 mg/kg) showed a modest therapeutic effect when combined with QL1203 or Vectibix, but had no effect on tumor growth as a monotherapy at this dosage. WX-0593 (75 mg/kg) exhibited modest antitumor efficacy that was further enhanced in combination with QL1203 or Vectibix in both tumor models (H1975 and Ba/F3). No significant body weight alteration, any other side effect, or deaths were observed during treatment. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the serum level of QL1203 or Vectibix was significantly increased and lasted longer when combined with WX-0593.

Conclusions

WX-0593 exhibited a synergetic effect with an EGFR monoclonal antibody on osimertinib-resistant EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) both in vitro and in vivo. Their combination showed potent antitumor efficacy and an acceptable safety profile, which may be a promising strategy for the treatment of patients with EGFR triple-mutant NSCLC resistant to osimertinib.

Tumor-associated eosinophilia in a patient with EGFR-positive, MET-amplified lung adenocarcinoma refractory to targeted therapy: a case report and review of literature

Paraneoplastic eosinophilia is a rare complication observed in 1% solid tumor cases and appears to have tumor type-dependent prognostic impact, in which the increased eosinophil count was generally associated with unfavorable prognosis. In the English literature, more than 20 patients have been reported of eosinophilia associated with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at diagnosis, all of whom underwent either surgery, chemotherapy, or symptomatic therapy. Herein, we describe clinical course a stage IV NSCLC patient with paraneoplastic eosinophilia and leukocytosis and receiving targeted therapy. A 64-year-old male former smoker was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR L858R mutation and MET amplification. Blood eosinophilia was manifested at diagnosis and confirmed to be paraneoplastic by eliminating other potential causes. The disease progressed rapidly within a month on EGFR inhibitor icotinib and then within three months on icotinib plus crizotinib after rapid response within the first month. A multi-target kinase inhibitor anlotinib was added, and the disease progressed one month later despite initial self-reported asymptomatic high-performance status. The patient was lost to subsequent follow-ups. Radiographic evaluation of disease control or progression coincided with respective distinct alleviation or worsening of eosinophilia. Consistent with previous reports of poor clinical outcome associated with blood eosinophilia, our results suggested a negative prognostic impact in EGFR-/MET-altered NSCLC. This case is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to provide evidence for blood eosinophilia paralleling disease progression in an EGFR- and MET-altered lung adenocarcinoma under targeted therapy, which suggested negative prognostic impact of blood eosinophilia in driver-positive NSCLC.

Dual target inhibitors based on EGFR: Promising anticancer agents for the treatment of cancers (2017-)

The EGFR family play a significant role in cell signal transduction and their overexpression is implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous human solid cancers. Inhibition of the EGFR-mediated signaling pathways by EGFR inhibitors is a widely used strategy for the treatment of cancers. In most cases, the EGFR inhibitors used in clinic were only effective when the cancer cells harbored specific activating EGFR mutations which appeared to preserve the ligand-dependency of receptor activation but altered the pattern of downstream signaling pathways. Moreover, cancer is a kind of multifactorial disease, and therefore manipulating a single target may result in treatment failure. Although drug combinations for the treatment of cancers proved to be successful, the use of two or more drugs concurrently still was a challenge in clinical therapy owing to various dose-limiting toxicities and drug-drug interactions caused by pharmacokinetic profiles changed. Therefore, a single drug targeting two or multiple targets could serve as an effective strategy for the treatment of cancers. In recent, drugs with diverse pharmacological effects have been shown to be more advantageous than combination therapies due to their lower incidences of side effects and more resilient therapies. Accordingly, dual target-single-agent strategy has become a popular field for cancer treatment, and researchers became more and more interest in the development of novel dual-target drugs in recent years. In this review, we briefly introduce the EGFR family proteins and synergisms between EGFR and other anticancer targets, and summarizes the development of potential dual target inhibitors based on wild-type and/or mutant EGFR for the treatment of solid cancers in the past five years. Additionally, the rational design and SARs of these dual target agents are also presented in detailed, which will lay a significant foundation for the further development of novel EGFR-based dual inhibitors with excellent druggability.

Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib and emerging therapeutic strategies in nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to introduce the resistance mechanisms to osimertinib, discuss the therapeutic strategies, and make clinical updates in overcoming resistance to osimertinib.

RECENT FINDINGS

Osimertinib has shown favorable efficacy on second-line and first-line treatments in EGFR-mutant advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the presence of primary and acquired resistance to osimertinib restricts its clinical benefits. The primary resistance mainly consists of BIM deletion polymorphism and EGFR exon 20 insertions. Meanwhile, the heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance include EGFR-dependent (on-target) and EGFR-independent (off-target) mechanisms. EGFR C797S mutation, MET amplification, HER2 amplification, and small cell lung cancer transformation were identified as frequent resistance mechanisms. Recently, more novel mechanisms, including rare EGFR point mutations and oncogenic fusions, were reported. With the results of completed and on-going clinical trials, the emerging therapeutic strategies of postosimertinib progression are summarized.

SUMMARY

The resistance mechanisms to osimertinib are heterogeneous and gradually perfected. The combination of osimertinib with bypass targeted therapy and other therapeutic approaches emerge as promising strategies.

Molecular charcterization of lung adenocarcinoma combining whole exome sequencing, copy number analysis and gene expression profiling

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide; lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) corresponds to about 40% of lung cancers. LUAD is a genetically heterogeneous disease and the definition of this heterogeneity is of fundamental importance for prognosis and treatment.

AREAS COVERED

Based on primary literature, this review provides an updated analysis of multiomics studies based on the study of mutation profiling, copy number alterations and gene expression allowing for definition of molecular subgroups, prognostic factors based on molecular biomarkers, and identification of therapeutic targets. The authors sum up by providing the reader with their expert opinion on the potentialities of multiomics analysis of LUADs.

EXPERT OPINION

A detailed and comprehensive study of the co-occurring genetic abnormalities characterizing different LUAD subsets represents a fundamental tool for a better understanding of the disease heterogeneity and for the identification of subgroups of patients responding or resistant to targeted treatments and for the discovery of new therapeutic targets. It is expected that a comprehensive characterization of LUADs may provide a fundamental contribution to improve the survival of LUAD patients.

Stereospecific inhibition of AMPK by (R)-crizotinib induced changes to the morphology and properties of cancer and cancer stem cell-like cells

Crizotinib is used in the clinic for treating patients with ALK- or ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung carcinoma. The objective of the present study was to determine if crizotinib enantiomers could induce changes to the properties of cancer and cancer stem cell (CSC)-like cells at a high concentration (∼ 3 μM). While (R)-crizotinib induced changes in morphologies or sizes of cells, (S)-crizotinib did not. Pretreatment with (R)-crizotinib suppressed the proliferation of cancer or CSC-like cells in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. In vivo administration of (R)-crizotinib inhibited the growth of tumors formed from CSC-like cells by 72%. %. Along with the morphological changes induced by (R)-crizotinib, the expression levels of CD44 (NCI-H23 and HCT-15), ALDH1 (NCI-H460), nanog (PC-3), and Oct-4A (CSC-like cells), which appear to be specific marker proteins, were greatly changed, suggesting that changes in cellular properties accompanied the morphological changes in the cells. The expression levels of Snail, Slug, and E-cadherin were also greatly altered by (R)-crizotinib. Among several signal transduction molecules examined, AMPK phosphorylation appeared to be selectively inhibited by (R)-crizotinib. BML-275 (an AMPK inhibitor) and AMPKα2 siRNA efficiently induced morphological changes to all types of cells examined, suggesting that (R)-crizotinib might cause losses of characteristics of cancer or CSCs via inhibition of AMPK. These results indicate that (R)-crizotinib might be an effective anticancer agent that can cause alteration in cancer cell properties.

A Large Real-World Study on the Effectiveness of the Combined Inhibition of EGFR and MET in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Development of EGFR-TKI Resistance

Background

MET proto-oncogene amplification (amp) is an important mechanism underlying acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the optimal treatment strategy after acquiring MET-amp-mediated EGFR-TKI resistance remains controversial. Our study compared three treatment strategies for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were detected with MET-amp at EGFR-TKI progression using next-generation sequencing.

Methods

Of the 70 patients included in the study, 38 received EGFR-TKI + crizotinib, 10 received crizotinib monotherapy, and 22 received chemotherapy. Clinical outcomes and molecular profiles were analyzed.

Results

The objective response rate was 48.6% for EGFR-TKI + crizotinib group, 40.0% for crizotinib monotherapy group, and 18.2% for chemotherapy group. Patients who received EGFR-TKI + crizotinib had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who received crizotinib or chemotherapy (5.0 vs. 2.3 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.010), but overall survival was comparable (10.0 vs. 4.1 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.088). TP53 mutation (58.5%) and EGFR-amp (42.9%) were frequent concurrent mutations of the cohort. Progression-free survival was significantly longer for patients with either concurrent TP53 mutation (n = 17) (6.0 vs. 2.3 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.009) or EGFR-amp (n = 13) (5.0 vs. 1.2 vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.016) in the EGFR-TKI + crizotinib group than the other two regimen. Potential acquired resistance mechanisms to EGFR-TKI + crizotinib included EGFR-T790M (n = 2), EGFR-L718Q (n = 1), EGFR-S645C (n = 1), MET-D1228H (n = 1), BRAF-V600E (n = 1), NRAS-Q61H (n = 1), KRAS-amp (n = 1), ERBB2-amp (n = 1), CDK4-amp (n = 1), and MYC-amp (n = 1).

Conclusion

Our study provides real-world clinical evidence from a large cohort that simultaneous inhibition of EGFR and MET could be a more effective therapeutic strategy for patients with MET-amp acquired from EGFR-TKI therapy.

A case report of response to crizotinib in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic gallbladder cancer with met amplification and acquired resistance resulting from the loss of MET amplification

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a highly invasive disease and the most prevalent malignancy of the biliary system. Patients with GBC are commonly diagnosed at a late stage and have an unfavorable prognosis. Palliative chemotherapy has been the standard care for recurrent or metastatic disease in the past decades. Recently, several targeted therapies have been investigated in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) including inhibitors of genes or pathways such as FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, IDH1 mutations, and NTRK gene fusions. Also, several clinical studies involving molecular stratification have been performed in defined patient groups, for example, BRAF V600E and HER2. Mesenchymal epithelial transition(MET)encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor and its ligand hepatocyte growth factor is a proto-oncogene. Targeting the MET signaling pathway is an effective strategy in numerous cancer types. However, the poor efficacy of MET inhibitors has been demonstrated in several phase II studies, but currently no reports have explained the potential mechanisms of resistance to MET inhibitors in BTC. In this article, we report a case of metastatic GBC with MET amplification that exhibited a rapid response to crizotinib after the failure of two lines of chemotherapy. After the patient had progressed and discontinued crizotinib, cabozantinib was introduced. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) indicated a loss of MET amplification status. To our knowledge, this is the first case study demonstrating the use of NGS in ctDNA to monitor the development of acquired resistance during anti-MET treatment in GBC.

Hype or hope - Can combination therapies with third-generation EGFR-TKIs help overcome acquired resistance and improve outcomes in EGFR-mutant advanced/metastatic NSCLC?

Three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have been developed for treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR-activating mutations, while a fourth generation is undergoing preclinical assessment. Although initially effective, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs usually arises within a year due to the emergence of clones harboring multiple resistance mechanisms. Therefore, the combination of EGFR-TKIs with other therapeutic agents has emerged as a potential strategy to overcome resistance and improve clinical outcomes. However, results obtained so far are ambiguous and ideal therapies for patients who experience disease progression during treatment with EGFR-TKIs remain elusive. This review provides an updated landscape of EGFR-TKIs, along with a description of the mechanisms causing resistance to these drugs. Moreover, it discusses the current knowledge, limitations, and future perspective regarding the use of EGFR-TKIs in combination with other anticancer agents, supporting the need for bench-to-bedside approaches in selected populations.

Overexpression of RhoV Promotes the Progression and EGFR-TKI Resistance of Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background

The Rho GTPase family with ~20 member genes play central roles in a wide variety of cellular processes and tumor cell migration and metastasis. Different Rho GTPase may play different roles in the progression of lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We comprehensively examined the expression of all Rho GTPase family member genes in a panel of lung adenocarcinoma patient’s tumors and matched normal tissues. We next investigated the critical role of RhoV in different lung adenocarcinoma cells and animal models.

Results

RhoV was identified as one of the most significantly overexpressed Rho GTPases in lung adenocarcinoma and associated with patients’ survival. Silencing RhoV expression inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion, and tumorigenicity capacities of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Moreover, knockdown RhoV promoted the sensitivity of EGFR-TKI in the gefitinib resistant PC9 cells (PC9-GR) and aggravated gefitinib-induced lung cancer cell apoptosis both in PC9 and PC9-GR cells. Our data also indicated that RhoV induced progression and EGFR-TKI resistance of lung adenocarcinoma may be related to the activation of the AKT/ERK pathway.

Conclusion

Overexpression of RhoV in lung adenocarcinoma promotes the progression and EGFR-TKI resistance, suggesting RhoV is a promising prognosis and therapeutic target of lung adenocarcinoma.

Early-onset interstitial pneumonitis in a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib and osimertinib

Both crizotinib and osimertinib have been reported to have an adverse effect of interstitial pneumonitis in the treatment of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the case of a 60‐year‐old male patient with advanced NSCLC resistant to osimertinib. Crizotinib was administered in combination with osimertinib due to elevated mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) copy number amplification. However, early‐onset interstitial pneumonitis occurred within two days.

Both crizotinib and osimertinib had an adverse effect of interstitial pneumonitis in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Here, we report a 60‐year‐old male patient with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer resistant to osimertinib. Crizotinib was used in combination with osimertinib due to elevated mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) copy number amplification, but an early‐onset interstitial pneumonitis occurred within two days.