1
|
Kaikkonen L, Virtanen EA. Shallow-water mining undermines global sustainability goals. Trends Ecol Evol 2022; 37:931-934. [PMID: 36114051 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
Coastal mineral resources are promoted as a sustainable option to meet increasing metal demands. However, shallow-water mining contradicts international conservation and sustainability goals and its regulative legislation is still being developed. In the absence of thorough comparisons of different mining practices, there are no justifications in favour of shallow-water mining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Kaikkonen
- Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM), Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Elina A Virtanen
- Finnish Natural History Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Marine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen W, Wallhead P, Hynes S, Groeneveld R, O'Connor E, Gambi C, Danovaro R, Tinch R, Papadopoulou N, Smith C. Ecosystem service benefits and costs of deep-sea ecosystem restoration. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 303:114127. [PMID: 34838382 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Deep-sea ecosystems are facing degradation which could have severe consequences for biodiversity and the livelihoods of coastal populations. Ecosystem restoration as a natural based solution has been regarded as a useful means to recover ecosystems. The study provides a social cost-benefit analysis for a proposed project to restore the Dohrn Canyon cold water corals and the deep-sea ecosystem in the Bay of Naples, Italy. By incorporating ecosystem service benefits and uncertainties related to a complex natural-technological-social system surrounding restoration activities, the study demonstrated how to evaluate large-scale ecosystem restoration activities. The results indicate that an ecosystem restoration project can be economic (in terms of welfare improvement) even if the restoration costs are high. Our study shows the uncertainty associated with restoration success rate significantly affects the probability distribution of the expected net present values. Identifying and controlling the underlying factors to improve the restoration successful rate is thus crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stephen Hynes
- SEMRU (Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit), Whitaker Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Rolf Groeneveld
- Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Wageningen University, the Netherlands
| | - Eamon O'Connor
- SEMRU (Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit), Whitaker Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Cristina Gambi
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Roberto Danovaro
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy; Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hooper T, Austen M, Lannin A. Developing policy and practice for marine net gain. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2021; 277:111387. [PMID: 33011423 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Policies that require development projects to ensure no net loss (NNL) of biodiversity are becoming common globally. Momentum is increasing to extend this concept to one of net gain, including for the marine environment. While such policies are being formulated it is important to learn the lessons from NNL approaches and consider the wider opportunities presented by a net gain strategy. The vehicle for NNL is typically the mitigation hierarchy, which is applied through planning consents and licensing to projects expected to have significant environmental impact. However, it becomes clear that significant marine net gain is unlikely to be achieved by following this approach. Attempting site-based like-for-like compensation, restoration and enhancement is likely to result in only a minimal contribution towards aspirations for environmental recovery and addressing the climate and biodiversity crises. Moving forward with an effective net gain strategy will be a complex process, with challenges that range from a lack of data to the limitations presented by existing governance frameworks. In particular, the inadequate treatment of cumulative effects within the Environmental Impact Assessment process, and how regional marine planning can be better used to translate strategic objectives to the site level, need to be addressed. Taking the broader perspective of environmental (as opposed to biodiversity-only) net gain, and linking this to the natural capital approach offers advantages, and it is also essential that marine net gain considers species as well as habitats. Widespread marine net gain cannot occur independently of fisheries management, and extensive public engagement and stakeholder co-production is required to develop the necessary collaborative solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Hooper
- School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
| | - Melanie Austen
- School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Aisling Lannin
- Marine Management Organisation, Lancaster House, Hampshire Court, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 7YH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hummel C, Poursanidis D, Orenstein D, Elliott M, Adamescu MC, Cazacu C, Ziv G, Chrysoulakis N, van der Meer J, Hummel H. Protected Area management: Fusion and confusion with the ecosystem services approach. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 651:2432-2443. [PMID: 30336433 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
For many years, Protected Areas (PA) have been an important tool for conserving nature. Recently, also societal aspects have been introduced into PA management via the introduction of the Ecosystem Services (ES) approach. This review discusses the historical background of PAs, PA management, and the ES approach. We then discuss the relevance and applicability of the ES approach for PA management, including the different definitions of ES, different classification methods, and the ways in which ES are measured. We conclude that there are still major challenges ahead in using the ES approach in PA management and so recommendations are given on the way in which the ES approach should be integrated into PA management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiaan Hummel
- Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, Yerseke, the Netherlands; VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Dimitris Poursanidis
- Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, 70013 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Daniel Orenstein
- Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Michael Elliott
- Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | | | | | - Guy Ziv
- School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nektarios Chrysoulakis
- Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, 70013 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Jaap van der Meer
- VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, Department of Ocean and Coastal Systems, Texel, the Netherlands
| | - Herman Hummel
- Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, Yerseke, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaikkonen L, Venesjärvi R, Nygård H, Kuikka S. Assessing the impacts of seabed mineral extraction in the deep sea and coastal marine environments: Current methods and recommendations for environmental risk assessment. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2018; 135:1183-1197. [PMID: 30301017 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Mineral extraction from the seabed has experienced a recent surge of interest from both the mining industry and marine scientists. While improved methods of geological investigation have enabled the mapping of new seafloor mineral reserves, the ecological impacts of mining in both the deep sea and the shallow seabed are poorly known. This paper presents a synthesis of the empirical evidence from experimental seabed mining and parallel industries to infer the effects of seabed mineral extraction on marine ecosystems, focusing on polymetallic nodules and ferromanganese concretions. We use a problem-structuring framework to evaluate causal relationships between pressures caused by nodule extraction and the associated changes in marine ecosystems. To ensure that the rationale behind impact assessments is clear, we propose that future impact assessments use pressure-specific expert elicitation. We further discuss integrating ecosystem services in the impact assessments and the implications of current methods for environmental risk assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Kaikkonen
- Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Riikka Venesjärvi
- Biosociety and Environment Unit, Natural Resource Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Henrik Nygård
- Marine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sakari Kuikka
- Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burdon D, Barnard S, Boyes SJ, Elliott M. Oil and gas infrastructure decommissioning in marine protected areas: System complexity, analysis and challenges. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2018; 135:739-758. [PMID: 30301093 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/28/2018] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Many offshore oil and gas production facilities are nearing the end of their operational life, with decommissioning now becoming a global challenge. The compatibility of decommissioning operations to marine protected areas (MPAs) creates further challenges. The recently-developed DAPSI(W)R(M) problem structuring framework (covering Drivers, Activities, Pressures, State changes, Impacts (on Welfare) and Responses (as Measures)) was applied here to interrogate the complexity of decommissioning oil and gas infrastructure within MPAs, with outputs feeding into the development of a novel database tool for Screening Potential Impacts of Decommissioning Activities (SPIDA). In meeting the current requirements of the marine regulatory regime, SPIDA provides a more streamlined, evidence-based process which can be applied by industry, statutory nature conservation bodies and regulators for identifying and evaluating evidence that supports the implications of decommissioning alternatives on the condition of MPAs. SPIDA has been developed to be adapted for other activities and sectors, including offshore renewables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Burdon
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
| | - S Barnard
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | - S J Boyes
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | - M Elliott
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cooper KM, Barry J. A big data approach to macrofaunal baseline assessment, monitoring and sustainable exploitation of the seabed. Sci Rep 2017; 7:12431. [PMID: 28963498 PMCID: PMC5622093 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11377-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study we produce a standardised dataset for benthic macrofauna and sediments through integration of data (33,198 samples) from 777 grab surveys. The resulting dataset is used to identify spatial and temporal patterns in faunal distribution around the UK, and the role of sediment composition and other explanatory variables in determining such patterns. We show how insight into natural variability afforded by the dataset can be used to improve the sustainability of activities which affect sediment composition, by identifying conditions which should remain favourable for faunal recolonisation. Other big data applications and uses of the dataset are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Cooper
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, United Kingdom.
| | - J Barry
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ma D, Zhang L, Fang Q, Jiang Y, Elliott M. The cumulative effects assessment of a coastal ecological restoration project in China: An integrated perspective. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2017; 118:254-260. [PMID: 28274474 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Revised: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Large scale coastal land-claim and sea-enclosing (CLASE) activities have caused habitat destruction, biodiversity losses and water deterioration, thus the local governments in China have recently undertaken seabed dredging and dyke opening (SDADO) as typical ecological restoration projects. However, some projects focus on a single impact on hydrodynamic conditions, water quality or marine organisms. In a case study in Xiamen, China, an integrated effects assessment framework centres on ecohydrology, using modeling of hydrodynamic conditions and statistical analysis of water quality, was developed to assess the effects of ecological restoration projects. The benefits of SDADO projects include improving hydrodynamic conditions and water quality, as a precursor to further marine biological improvements. This study highlights the need to comprehensively consider ecological effects of SDADO projects in the planning stage, and an integrative assessment method combining cumulative effects of hydrodynamic conditions, water quality and biological factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deqiang Ma
- Coastal and Ocean Management Institute, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
| | - Liyu Zhang
- Xiamen Oceans and Fisheries Institute, Xiamen 361000, China
| | - Qinhua Fang
- Coastal and Ocean Management Institute, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Coastal Ecology and Environmental Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.
| | - Yuwu Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
| | - Michael Elliott
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elliott M, Burdon D, Atkins JP, Borja A, Cormier R, de Jonge VN, Turner RK. "And DPSIR begat DAPSI(W)R(M)!" - A unifying framework for marine environmental management. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2017; 118:27-40. [PMID: 28396077 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The marine environment is a complex system formed by interactions between ecological structure and functioning, physico-chemical processes and socio-economic systems. An increase in competing marine uses and users requires a holistic approach to marine management which considers the environmental, economic and societal impacts of all activities. If managed sustainably, the marine environment will deliver a range of ecosystem services which lead to benefits for society. In order to understand the complexity of the system, the DPSIR (Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response) approach has long been a valuable problem-structuring framework used to assess the causes, consequences and responses to change in a holistic way. Despite DPSIR being used for a long time, there is still confusion over the definition of its terms and so to be appropriate for current marine management, we contend that this confusion needs to be addressed. Our viewpoint advocates that DPSIR should be extended to DAPSI(W)R(M) (pronounced dap-see-worm) in which Drivers of basic human needs require Activities which lead to Pressures. The Pressures are the mechanisms of State change on the natural system which then leads to Impacts (on human Welfare). Those then require Responses (as Measures). Furthermore, because of the complexity of any managed sea area in terms of multiple Activities, there is the need for a linked-DAPSI(W)R(M) framework, and then the connectivity between marine ecosystems and ecosystems in the catchment and further at sea, requires an interlinked, nested-DAPSI(W)R(M) framework to reflect the continuum between adjacent ecosystems. Finally, the unifying framework for integrated marine management is completed by encompassing ecosystem structure and functioning, ecosystem services and societal benefits. Hence, DAPSI(W)R(M) links the socio-ecological system of the effects of changes to the natural system on the human uses and benefits of the marine system. However, to deliver these sustainably in the light of human activities requires a Risk Assessment and Risk Management framework; the ISO-compliant Bow-Tie method is used here as an example. Finally, to secure ecosystem health and economic benefits such as Blue Growth, successful, adaptive and sustainable marine management Responses (as Measures) are delivered using the 10-tenets, a set of facets covering all management disciplines and approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Elliott
- Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
| | - D Burdon
- Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | - J P Atkins
- Hull University Business School (HUBS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | - A Borja
- AZTI, Marine Research Division, Herrera Kaia Portualdea s/n, 20110 Pasaia, Spain
| | - R Cormier
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Centre for Materials and Coastal Research, Institute for Coastal Research, Max-Planck-Strabe 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany
| | - V N de Jonge
- Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | - R K Turner
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Waye-Barker GA, McIlwaine P, Lozach S, Cooper KM. The effects of marine sand and gravel extraction on the sediment composition and macrofaunal community of a commercial dredging site (15 years post-dredging). MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2015; 99:207-15. [PMID: 26254881 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Revised: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/09/2015] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
A prediction that faunal recovery of a marine aggregate extraction site subjected to high dredging intensity was likely to take 15-20 years was investigated. Samples were collected at the high dredging intensity site and two reference sites in 2011 (15 years post-dredging). Results indicated that the high site had similar sediment characteristics to the reference sites by 2011. Macrofaunal data analyses showed no difference between the values of all calculated univariate measures (abundance, number of taxa, biomass and evenness) between the high and reference sites. Multivariate analyses found that the macrofaunal community at the high site was comparable to those of the reference sites by 2011. Overall, the results supported the predicted recovery time. The findings of the study suggest that persistent physical impacts prolonged the biological recovery of the high site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul McIlwaine
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Lozach
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom
| | - Keith M Cooper
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smyth K, Burdon D, Atkins JP, Barnes RA, Elliott M. Renewables-to-reefs: Response to Fowler et al. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2015; 98:372-374. [PMID: 26277603 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.07.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 07/03/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- K Smyth
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
| | - D Burdon
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | - J P Atkins
- The Business School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | - R A Barnes
- The Law School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | - M Elliott
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smyth K, Christie N, Burdon D, Atkins JP, Barnes R, Elliott M. Renewables-to-reefs? - Decommissioning options for the offshore wind power industry. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2015; 90:247-58. [PMID: 25467865 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.10.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2014] [Revised: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The offshore wind power industry is relatively new but increasing globally, hence it is important that the whole life-cycle is managed. The construction-operation-decommissioning cycle is likely to take 20-30 years and whilst decommissioning may not be undertaken for many years, its management needs to be addressed in both current and future marine management regimes. This can be defined within a Drivers-Activities-Pressures-State Changes-Impacts (on human Welfare)-Responses framework. This paper considers the main decommissioning options - partial or complete removal of all components. A SWOT analysis shows environmental and economic benefits in partial as opposed to complete removal, especially if habitat created on the structures has conservation or commercial value. Benefits (and repercussions) are defined in terms of losses and gains of ecosystem services and societal benefits. The legal precedents and repercussions of both options are considered in terms of the 10-tenets of sustainable marine management. Finally a 'renewables-to-reefs' programme is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Smyth
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
| | | | - Daryl Burdon
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| | | | | | - Michael Elliott
- Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
| |
Collapse
|