Risk of Acute Kidney Injury, Dialysis, and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease After Intravenous Contrast Material Exposure

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Following IV Iodinated Contrast Media Exposure: 2023 Update, From the AJR Special Series on Contrast Media

Iodinated contrast material (ICM) has revolutionized the field of diagnostic radiology through improvements in diagnostic performance and the expansion of clinical indications for radiographic and CT examinations. Historically, nephrotoxicity was a feared complication of ICM use, thought to be associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Such fears often precluded the use of ICM in imaging evaluations, commonly at the expense of diagnostic performance and timely diagnosis. Over the past 20 years, the nephrotoxic risk of ICM has become a topic of debate, as more recent evidence from higher-quality studies now suggests that many cases of what was considered contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) likely were cases of mistaken causal attribution; most of these cases represented either acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by any of myriad other known factors that can adversely affect renal function and were coincidentally present at the time of contrast media exposure (termed "contrast-associated AKI" [CA-AKI]) or a manifestation of the normal variation in renal function that increases with worsening renal function. This Special Series Review discusses the current state of knowledge regarding CI-AKI and CA-AKI, including the incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and prophylactic strategies in the identification and management of these clinical conditions.

Incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury: a prospective cohort

INTRODUCTION

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) is a deterioration of kidney function that occurs after the administration of a iodinated contrast medium (ICM). Most studies that defined this phenomenon used older ICMs that were more prone of causing CA-AKI. In the past decade, several articles questioned the true incidence of CA-AKI. However, there is still a paucity of a data about the safety of newer ICM.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence of CA-AKI in hospitalized patients that were exposed to computed tomography (CT) with and without ICM.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study with 1003 patients who underwent CT in a tertiary hospital from December 2020 through March 2021. All inpatients aged > 18 years who had a CT scan during this period were screened for the study. CA-AKI was defined as a relative increase of serum creatinine of ≥ 50% from baseline or an absolute increase of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 18 to 48 hours after the CT. Chi-squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and linear regression model with restricted cubic splines were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The incidence of CA-AKI was 10.1% in the ICM-exposed group and 12.4% in the control group when using the absolute increase criterion. The creatinine variation from baseline was not significantly different between groups. After adjusting for baseline factors, contrast use did not correlate with worse renal function.

CONCLUSION

The rate of CA-AKI is very low, if present at all, with newer ICMs, and excessive caution regarding contrast use is probably unwarranted.

Evaluation of Abdominal Emergencies

Early primary assessment and abdominal examination can often be enough to triage the patient with abdominal pain into those with less severe underlying pathologic condition from those with more acute findings. A focused history of the patient can then allow the clinician to develop their differential diagnosis. Once the differential diagnoses are determined, diagnostic imaging and laboratory findings can help confirm the diagnosis and allow for expeditious treatment and intervention.

Effects of intravenous hydration in preventing post-contrast acute kidney injury in patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of intravenous hydration in preventing post-contrast outcomes in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 undergoing intravenous administration of iodinated contrast media (ICM).

METHODS

Hospitalized patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and intravenous ICM exposure between 2015 and 2021 were included. Post-contrast outcomes include post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) (defined by 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) or European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)), chronic dialysis at discharge, and in-hospital mortality. Confounding effects between the two groups were reduced to a minimum using propensity score-based matching and overlap weighting. Association between intravenous hydration and outcomes was analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 794 patients were included in the study, with 284 receiving intravenous hydration, and 510 not. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 210 pairs were generated. No significant differences were found in the outcomes between the intravenous hydration and no intravenous hydration groups: PC-AKI by KDIGO, 25.2% vs 24.8% (odds ratio (OR), 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-1.50); PC-AKI by ESUR, 31.0% vs 25.2% (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.86-2.08); chronic dialysis at discharge, 4.3% vs 3.3% (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.56-4.50); in-hospital mortality, 1.9% vs 0.5% (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 0.58-81.08). Overlap propensity score-weighted analysis also showed no significant effects of intravenous hydration on the incidences of the post-contrast outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous hydration was not associated with lower risks of PC-AKI, chronic dialysis at discharge, and in-hospital mortality in patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 undergoing intravenous administration of ICM.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study provides new evidence in supporting that intravenous hydration is not beneficial to patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 before and after intravenous administration of iodinated contrast media.

KEY POINTS

• Intravenous hydration before and after intravenous administration of ICM is not associated with lower risks in PC-AKI, chronic dialysis at discharge, and in-hospital mortality in patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. • Withholding intravenous hydration may be considered in patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 around intravenous administration of ICM.

Intravenous versus oral hydration to reduce the risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury after intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (ENRICH): a study protocol for a single-centre, parallel-group, open-labelled non-inferiority randomised controlled trial in Denmark

INTRODUCTION

Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) is widely used for diagnostic purposes. The use of contrast medium carries a risk for postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI), especially in patients with AKI or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Current guidelines recommend prophylactic intravenous hydration to prevent PC-AKI in high-risk patients. Oral hydration is non-inferior to intravenous hydration in patients with moderate CKD, but it has not been evaluated in high-risk patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The ENRICH trial will enrol 254 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 undergoing intravenous CECT, who are block randomised (2-4-2) with stratification for CKD stage, diabetes status, and indication for referral to prophylactic treatment with oral or intravenous hydration. PC-AKI is defined as an absolute increase in SCr of >0.3 mg/dL or >1.5 from baseline at 2-5 days. Renal function will also be evaluated <90 days, <7 days and 1-3 days before intravenous CECT, and 25-40 days after intravenous CECT. Secondary outcomes include dialysis, renal adverse events, hospitalisation due to hydration-related or contrast-related sequelae, and all-cause mortality ≤30 days postcontrast. Pre- and postcontrast plasma and urinary biomarkers will be evaluated for diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of the primary and secondary outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Oral hydration is patient-friendly and less costly compared with intravenous hydration. If oral hydration is non-inferior to intravenous hydration in high-risk patients, it could be implemented as new hydration strategy, which will facilitate the clinical diagnosing of elective patients with severe CKD without unnecessary resource utilisation. The protocol is approved by the Regional Scientific Ethical Committee for Southern Denmark (S-20210126), and the Data Protection Agency (21/66779). The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Positive as well as negative findings will be reported in international peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05283512.

Utilization and Outcomes of Clinically Indicated Invasive Cardiac Care in Veterans with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Chronic Kidney Disease

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Of studies reporting an association of CKD with lower use of invasive cardiac care to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS), just one accounted for the appropriateness of such care. However, its findings in patients hospitalized nearly 30 years ago may not apply to current practice. In a more recent cohort of 64,695 veterans hospitalized with ACS, CKD was associated with a 32% lower likelihood of receiving invasive care determined to be clinically indicated. Among patients with CKD, not receiving such care was associated with a 1.39-fold higher risk of 6-month mortality. Efforts to elucidate the reasons for this disparity in invasive care in patients with ACS and CKD and implement tailored interventions to enhance its use in this population may offer the potential to improve clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that patients with CKD are less likely than those without CKD to receive invasive care to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, few studies have accounted for whether such care was clinically indicated or assessed whether nonuse of such care was associated with adverse health outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US veterans who were hospitalized at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers from January 2013 through December 2017 and received a discharge diagnosis of ACS. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate the association of CKD with use of invasive care (coronary angiography, with or without revascularization; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; or both) deemed clinically indicated based on Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 risk scores that denoted a 6-month predicted all-cause mortality ≥5%. Using propensity scoring and inverse probability weighting, we examined the association of nonuse of clinically indicated invasive care with 6-month all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among 34,430 patients with a clinical indication for invasive care, the 18,780 patients with CKD were less likely than the 15,650 without CKD to receive such care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.72). Among patients with CKD, nonuse of invasive care was associated with higher risk of 6-month all-cause mortality (absolute risk, 21.5% versus 15.5%; absolute risk difference 6.0%; adjusted risk ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 1.49). Findings were consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary practice, veterans with CKD who experience ACS are less likely than those without CKD to receive clinically indicated invasive cardiac care. Nonuse of such care is associated with increased mortality.

Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Peripheral Vascular Interventions

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the use of prophylactic intravenous hydration (IV prophylaxis) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) angiography in reducing contrast associated-acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) and determine the overall incidence and risk factors of CA-AKI in high-risk patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). Method: Only patients undergoing elective PVI from 2017 to 2021 with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database were included. Patients were grouped into IV prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis. The study's primary outcome was CA-AKI, defined as a rise in creatinine (>.5 mg/dL) or new dialysis within 48 hours following contrast administration. Standard univariate and multivariable (logistic regression) analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 4497 patients were identified. Of these, 65% received IV prophylaxis. The overall incidence of CA-AKI was .93%. No significant difference was seen in overall contrast volume (mean (SD): 66.89(49.54) vs 65.94(51.97) milliliters, P > .05) between the 2 groups. After adjusting for significant covariates, the use of IV prophylaxis (OR (95% CI): 1.54(.77-3.18), P = .25) and CO₂ angiography (OR (95%CI): .95(.44-2.08), P = .90) was not associated with a significant reduction in CA-AKI compared to the patients with no prophylaxis. The severity of CKD and diabetes were the only predictor of CA-AKI. Compared to patients with no CA-AKI, patients with CA-AKI were at risk of higher 30-day mortality (OR (95% CI): 11.09 (4.25-28.93)) and cardiopulmonary complications (OR (95% CI): 19.03 (8.74-41.39) following PVI (Both P < .001). Conclusion: Using a large national vascular database, our study demonstrates that prophylactic use of IV hydration and CO₂ angiography in high-risk CKD patients is not associated with a reduction in renal injury following PVI. Reduced kidney function and history of diabetes is an independent predictor of CA-AKI and patients that develop post-procedural AKI are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality.

Atherosclerotic plaque composition and specific endovascular considerations in the end stage renal disease patients: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Vascular calcification (VC) and resulting vascular disease is one of the major causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD itself is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for cardiac and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This paper examines the atherosclerotic plaque composition and specific endovascular considerations in the end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The literature was reviewed regarding the current status of medical and interventional management arteriosclerotic disease in patients with CKD. Lastly, three representative cases displaying typical endovascular treatment options are provided.

Methods

A literature search was performed in PubMed covering publications up to September 2021 as well as discussion with experts in the field.

Key Content and Findings

The high prevalence of atherosclerotic lesions in patients with chronic renal failure and high (re-)stenosis cause problems in the medium and long term as vascular calcium load represents one of the most widely encountered predictors of failure of endovascular treatment of PAD and future cardiovascular events (e.g., coronary calcium score). Patients with CKD also suffer from a greater risk for major vascular adverse events in general and worse revascularization outcomes following peripheral vascular intervention. A correlation between calcium burden and drug-coated balloon (DCB) performance has been established for PAD necessitating the need for different tools to cope with vascular calcium such as endoprosthesis or braided stents. Patients with CKD are at a higher risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). In addition to recommendations such as the administration of intravenous fluids, carbon dioxide (CO₂) angiography is one option to potentially provide an effective and safe alternative both to iodine-based contrast media allergy and to the use of iodine-based contrast media in patients with CKD.

Conclusions

Management and endovascular procedures of patients with ESRD are complex. In the course of time, new endovascular therapy methods have been developed such as directional atherectomy (DA) and the so-called "pave-and-crack" technique to deal with high vascular calcium burden. Besides interventional therapy, vascular patients with CKD benefit from aggressive medical management.

Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Evidence in Support of Its Existence and a Review of Its Pathogenesis and Management

The role of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) remains controversial. Many experts contend that CIN does not exist or is extremely rare. The diagnosis was previously made too frequently and inappropriately in the presence of coexisting and confounding comorbidities and risk factors making it difficult to singularly isolate the etiologic role of intravenous contrast media in acute kidney injury (AKI). It is probable that many patients were denied important diagnostic information from radiocontrast studies for fear of CIN. Recently, a new terminology for CIN was introduced, and the term CIN was replaced by two interrelated new terms: one is contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), and the second one is contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). CA-AKI occurs in association with risk factors or comorbidities, therefore, it is a correlative diagnosis. On the other hand, CI-AKI is a subtype of CA-AKI that results directly from iodinated contrast media. In this review, we present evidence from various studies that argue against CI-AKI and also those that suggest its existence but with much lower frequency. We will also provide the current status of the pathophysiology and management of CA-AKI/CI-AKI.

Radiographic Contrast Media and the Kidney

AKI is a potential complication of intravascular iodinated contrast exposure. Contrast-associated AKI, which typically manifests as small and transient decrements in kidney function that develop within several days of contrast administration, is associated with serious adverse outcomes, including progressive kidney dysfunction and death. However, a causal link between the small increases in serum creatinine that characteristically occur with contrast-associated AKI and serious adverse outcomes remains unproven. This is important given mounting evidence that clinically indicated, potentially lifesaving radiographic procedures are underutilized in patients with CKD. This has been hypothesized to be related to provider concern about precipitating contrast-associated AKI. Intravascular gadolinium-based contrast, an alternative to iodinated contrast that is administered with magnetic resonance imaging, has also been linked with potential serious adverse events, notably the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with severe impairment in kidney function. Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit frequently have clinical indications for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that involve the intravascular administration of contrast media. Accordingly, critical care providers and others treating critically ill patients should possess a sound understanding of the risk factors for and incidence of such outcomes, the ability to perform evidence-based risk-benefit assessments regarding intravascular contrast administration, and knowledge of empirical data on the prevention of these iatrogenic complications.

Risk of acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced computerized tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 propensity score-matched cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous application of contrast media is part of a wide spectrum of diagnostic procedures for better imaging quality. Clinical avoidance of contrast-enhanced imaging is an ever-present quandary in patients with impaired kidney function. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis and mortality among patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT compared to propensity score-matched controls (i.e. contrast-unenhanced CT). Selected cohort studies featured high-risk patients with advanced kidney disease and critical illness.

METHODS

This review was designed to conform to the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed was searched from August 2021 to November 2021 for all-language articles without date restriction. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were included, comprising data of 169,455 patients. The overall risk of AKI was similar in the contrast-enhanced and unenhanced groups (OR: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.85; 1.11], p = 0.64), regardless of baseline renal function and underlying disease. Substantial heterogeneity was detected (I² = 90%, p ≤ 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified hypertension (p = 0.03) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.0001) as factors associated with greater risk of post-contrast AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on propensity score-matched pairs obtained from 21 cohort studies, we found no evidence for increased risk for AKI, dialysis or mortality after contrast-enhanced CT among patients with eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m². In congruence with the emerging evidence in the literature, caution should be exercised in patients with hypertension and eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m².

KEY POINTS

• The application of contrast media for medical imaging is not associated with higher odds for AKI, induction of renal replacement therapy, or mortality. Many comorbidities traditionally associated with greater risk for acute kidney injury do not appear to predispose for renal decline after contrast media exposure. • Underlying hypertension and eGFR less than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m² seem to predispose for post-contrast acute kidney injury. • Propensity score matching cannot account for unmeasured influences on AKI incidence, which needs to be addressed in the interpretation of results.

Patients with Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography-The Incidence of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Introduction: Iodinated contrast medium (CM) is the third most common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the association is poorly known between the definitions of AKI between different stages of chronic kidney disease after intravenous CM administration. Methods: The dataset, covering a period of ~15 years (1 June 2008 to 31 March 2015), consisted of 20,018 non-dialytic adult patients who had received intravenous injections of non-ionic iso-osmolar CM, iodixanol, for enhanced computed tomography imaging. Contrast-associated AKI (CA-AKI), dialysis-required AKI, and mortality were analyzed. Results: A total of 12,271 participants were enrolled. CA-AKI increased significantly starting from stage 3A onward (p < 0.001). In summary, incidences of CA-AKI against different levels of chronic kidney disease were as follows: stage 1 (8.3%) = stage 2 (6.7%) < stage 3A (9.9%) < stage 3B (14.3%) < stage 4 (20.5%) = stage 5 (20.4%). The incidences of dialysis within 30 days were as follows: stage 1 (1%) = stage 2 (1.4%) = stage 3A (2.7%) < stage 3B (5.7%) < stage 4 (18%) < stage 5 (54.1%). The prediction of dialysis was good based on the baseline serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL (72.78% of sensitivity, 86.07% of specificity, 0.851 of area under curve) or baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 38.49 mL/min/1.732 m2 (70.19% of sensitivity, 89.08% of specificity, 0.853 of area under curve). In multivariate Cox regression analysis model for CA-AKI, independent risk factors were stage 4 chronic kidney disease (p = 0.001) and shock (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Baseline serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate were good predictors for dialysis-required AKI. CA-AKI increased significantly since stage 3A chronic kidney disease. Stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease have the same risk for CA-AKI, but stage 5 chronic kidney disease has markedly higher risk for dialysis.

Intravenous CT Contrast Media and Acute Kidney Injury: A Multicenter Emergency Department-based Study

Background Although the historical risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after intravenous administration of contrast media might be overstated, the risk in patients with impaired kidney function remains a concern. Purpose To investigate whether intravenous contrast media administration during CT is associated with a higher risk of AKI and further hemodialysis compared with the risk in patients undergoing unenhanced CT. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent contrast-enhanced or unenhanced CT in five Taiwanese emergency departments between 2009 and 2016. The outcomes were AKI within 48-72 hours after CT, AKI within 48 hours to 1 week after CT, or further hemodialysis within 1 month after CT. The associations between contrast media exposure and outcome were estimated by using an overlap propensity score weighted generalized regression model. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results The study included 68 687 patients (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 53-74 years; 39 995 men) with (n = 31 103) or without (n = 37 584) exposure to contrast media. After propensity score weighting, contrast media exposure was associated with higher risk of AKI within 48-72 hours after CT (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.29; P = .007) but no significant risk at 48 hours to 1 week after CT (OR, 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.08; P = .90). Among patients with eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m², exposure to contrast media was associated with a higher AKI risk (48-72 hours after CT: OR, 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.70; P = .007) (48 hours-1 week after CT: OR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.27, 1.74; P < .001) and a higher risk of hemodialysis (OR, 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.70; P = .008). For patients with eGFR greater than 45 mL/min/1.73.m², contrast media exposure was not associated with higher AKI risk (P > .05). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced CT was associated with higher risk of acute kidney injury and further hemodialysis among Taiwanese patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m² but not those with an eGFR of more than 45 mL/min/1.73 m². © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Contrast associated nephropathy after intravenous administration: what is the magnitude of the problem?

Intravenous contrast media (CM) is often used in clinical practice to enhance CT scan imaging. For many years, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) was thought to be a common occurrence and to result in dire consequences. When treating patients with abnormal renal function, it is not unusual that clinicians postpone, cancel, or replace contrast-enhanced imaging with other, perhaps less informative tests. New studies however have challenged this paradigm and the true risk attributable to intravenous CM for the occurrence of CIN has become debatable. In this article, we review the latest relevant medical literature and aim to provide an evidence-based answer to questions surrounding the risk, outcomes, and potential mitigation strategies of CIN after intravenous CM administration.

Is intravenous iodinated contrast medium administration really harmful in hospitalized acute kidney injury patients: a propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of intravenous iodinated contrast medium (ICM) administration on the deterioration of renal function (DRF), new renal replacement therapy (RRT) induction and mortality of hospitalized acute kidney injury (AKI) patients.

METHODS

Adult hospitalized patients undergoing a contrast-enhanced or unenhanced CT scan within 7 days after AKI diagnosis from January 2015 to December 2019 were identified in this retrospective study. Propensity score matching was performed. Outcomes in 7 and 30 days after CT scan were compared between the contrast and non-contrast groups. Additional analyses were also performed in patients stratified by SCr levels at AKI diagnosis, times and time of CT scan, and in patients without chronic kidney disease or RRT requirement prior to CT scan.

RESULTS

In total, 1172 pairs were generated after 1:1 propensity score matching from 1336 cases exposed to ICM and 2724 unexposed. No significant differences were found in the outcomes between the two groups: DRF, 7.8% vs 9.0% (odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-1.11) in 7 days, 5.1% vs 5.4% (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.64-1.34) in 30 days; new RRT induction, 2.3% vs 3.3% (OR 0.72,95%CI 0.43-1.18) in 7 days, 4.2% vs 4.5% (OR 0.95,95%CI 0.64-1.41) in 30 days; and mortality, 3.9% vs 4.8% (OR 0.83,95%CI 0.56-1.22) in 7 days, 9.0% vs 10.2% (OR 0.88,95%CI 0.68-1.15) in 30 days. Subset analyses showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous ICM administration during AKI duration did not increase the risks of DRF, new RRT induction, and mortality in 7 and 30 days after CT scan.

KEY POINTS

• Intravenous ICM administration in hospitalized AKI patients does not increase the risks of deterioration of renal function, RRT induction, and mortality in 7 and 30 days after CT scan. • The effects of intravenous ICM on adverse outcomes are minimal even in AKI patients with high level of SCr values or multiple CT scans.

Acute Kidney Injury After Radiocontrast-Enhanced Computerized Tomography in Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Renal Failure: A Propensity-Score-Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

The overall risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) after computerized tomography (CT) is negligible, likely because of the small volume of injected iodinated contrast media required. However, the safety of contrast media-enhanced CT in patients with advanced renal functional impairment, an established major risk factor for PC-AKI, is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study using large data analysis of hospitalized patients at a single center. Adults undergoing CT or magnetic resonance imaging were included in the study and were stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (≤30 or >30 mL/min/1.73 m) and by either contrast-enhanced or nonenhanced imaging. Only patients with serial determination of creatinine before and after imaging were included. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data between groups were analyzed and compared using univariate analysis, propensity score matching, and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22,319 imaging studies were included. Patients with an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m or lower undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (n = 403) had an increased risk to develop PC-AKI than did similar patients undergoing enhanced or nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (n = 96) or nonenhanced CT (n = 1576) or patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT with a preprocedural eGFR higher than 30 mL/min/1.73 m (n = 9173). These findings remained robust after propensity matching for demographic, procedural, and clinical parameters. Multivariate regression analysis of all patients undergoing CT with preimaging eGFR of 30 mL/min or lower (n = 1979) revealed that iodine-based contrast enhancement increased the likelihood of post-CT AKI by 51% (confidence interval, 1.23-2.05).

CONCLUSION

Although radiocontrast-enhanced CT is considered safe in most hospitalized patients and in ambulatory settings, the risk of PC-AKI remains significant among inpatients with substantial preimaging renal functional impairment. Caution is warranted using iodine-based enhanced CT in hospitalized patients with an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m or lower.

Acute Kidney Injury After CT in Emergency Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after intravenous contrast administration for computed tomography (CT) occurs infrequently, but certain patients may be susceptible. This study evaluated AKI incidence among emergency department (ED) patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing CT exams.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study in an integrated healthcare system included ED patients previously diagnosed with CKD stages 3-5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 milliliters per minute per 1.73 meters squared over at least three months), undergoing CT exams with or without intravenous contrast, from January 1, 2013-December 31, 2017. We excluded patients with CT prior to (30 days) or following (14 days) index CT and missing serum creatinine (sCr) measurements. We applied propensity score matching, and then multivariable regression adjustment for post-CT ED disposition and ED diagnosis, to calculate adjusted risk of AKI. Secondary patient-centered outcomes included 30-day mortality, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) diagnosis, and dialysis initiation.

RESULTS

Among 103,573 eligible ED patients undergoing CT, propensity score matching yielded 5,589 pairs. Adjusted risk ratio (ARR) for AKI was higher overall for contrast-enhanced CT (1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-1.79). However, secondary outcomes were infrequent: 19/5,589 non-contrast vs 40/5,589 contrast patients with new dialysis initiation at 30 days (adjusted risk 0.3% vs 0.7%; adjusted risk reduction 0.4%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.7%).

CONCLUSION

In ED patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing CT, intravenous contrast was associated with higher overall adjusted risk of AKI, but patient-centered secondary outcomes were rare. The clinical significance of transient kidney injury after CT is unclear, although patients with advanced chronic kidney disease appear to have elevated risk.

Evaluation and management of the surgical abdomen

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to describe important features of clinical examination for the surgical abdomen, relevant investigations, and acute management of common surgical problems in the critically ill.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lactate remains a relatively nonspecific marker of gut ischemia. Dual energy computed tomography (DECT) scan can improve diagnosis of bowel ischemia. Further evidence supports intravenous contrast during CT scan in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Outcomes for acute mesenteric ischemia have failed to improve over time; however, increasing use of endovascular approaches, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, may decrease need for laparotomy in the appropriate patient. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia remains a challenging diagnostic and management dilemma. Acalculous cholecystitis is managed with a percutaneous cholecystostomy and is unlikely to require interval cholecystectomy. Surgeon comfort with intervention based on point-of-care ultrasound for biliary disease is variable. Mortality for toxic megacolon is decreasing.

SUMMARY

Physical examination remains an integral part of the evaluation of the surgical abdomen. Interpreting laboratory investigations in context and appropriate imaging improves diagnostic ability; intravenous contrast should not be withheld for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Surgical intervention should not be delayed for the patient in extremis. The intensivist and surgeon should remain in close communication to optimize care.

[Contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury-Consensus paper of the working group "Heart and Kidney" of the German Cardiac Society and the German Society of Nephrology]

This consensus paper summarizes the expert consensus and recommendations of the working group "Heart and Kidney" of the German Cardiac Society (DGK) and the German Society of Nephrology (DGfN) on contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury. Potentially nephrotoxic contrast agents containing iodine are frequently used in interventional medicine and for computer tomography diagnostics. Acute kidney injury occurs in approximately 8-17% of patients exposed to contrast media. The risk factors and underlying pathophysiology are discussed and recommendations for the prophylaxis and treatment of contrast medium-induced acute nephropathy are presented.

Post-Contrast Acute Kidney Injury and Intravenous Prophylactic Hydration: An Update

BACKGROUND

 Despite tremendous improvement in molecular properties over the last century, intravascular injection of iodinated contrast material may still have systemic and hemodynamic consequences. Patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency may be at risk for acute kidney injury, which may be associated with an increased risk of the need for dialysis and mortality in the long term. Many questions as to the physiological pathways, optimal definition, and incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury remain open. These uncertainties are reflected in the changing landscape of this field in terms of nomenclature, research, and clinical practice.

METHODS

 Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention of post-contrast acute kidney injury all recommend giving prophylaxis in the form of intravenous hydration to high-risk patients. Solid evidence for this strategy is lacking. This article gives an overview of the changing landscape of post-contrast acute kidney injury and prophylactic intravenous hydration, with the aim of supporting informed decision-making in clinical practice.

RESULTS

 Recent data have caused a shift in guideline recommendations: 90 % of patients formerly considered high-risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury no longer qualify for prophylaxis. The remaining high-risk patients, with severe chronic kidney disease, represent a vulnerable population for whom intravenous hydration may provide some benefits but also carries risk.

CONCLUSION

 Intravenous hydration may benefit 'new' high-risk patients. However, it also confers risk. A dual approach to screening patients will help avoid this risk in clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

  · Intravenous hydration is the cornerstone for preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury. · Solid evidence is lacking; recent data caused a shift in guideline recommendations. · Intravenous hydration may benefit 'new' high-risk patients with severe chronic kidney disease; however, it also confers risk. · A dual approach to screening patients will help avoid this risk in clinical practice.

CITATION FORMAT

· Nijssen E, Rennenberg R, Nelemans P et al. Post-Contrast Acute Kidney Injury and Intravenous Prophylactic Hydration: An Update. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 151 - 159.

Iodinated contrast medium: Is there a re(n)al problem? A clinical vignette-based review

As we were taught, for decades, that iodinated contrast-induced acute kidney injury should be dreaded, considerable efforts were made to find out effective measures in mitigating the renal risk of iodinated contrast media. Imaging procedures were frequently either downgraded (unenhanced imaging) or deferred as clinicians felt that the renal risk pertaining to contrast administration outweighed the benefits of an enhanced imaging. However, could we have missed the point? Among the abundant literature about iodinated contrast-associated acute kidney injury, recent meaningful advances may help sort out facts from false beliefs. Hence, there is increasing evidence that the nephrotoxicity directly attributable to modern iodinated CM has been exaggerated. Failure to demonstrate a clear benefit from most of the tested prophylactic measures might be an indirect consequence. However, the toxic potential of iodinated contrast media is well established experimentally and should not be overlooked completely when making clinical decisions. We herein review these advances in disease and pathophysiologic understanding and the associated clinical crossroads through a typical case vignette in the critical care setting.

Perioperative intravenous contrast administration and the incidence of acute kidney injury after major gastrointestinal surgery: prospective, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the impact of preoperative exposure to intravenous contrast for CT and the risk of developing postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre cohort study included adults undergoing gastrointestinal resection, stoma reversal or liver resection. Both elective and emergency procedures were included. Preoperative exposure to intravenous contrast was defined as exposure to contrast administered for the purposes of CT up to 7 days before surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of AKI within 7 days. Propensity score-matched models were adjusted for patient, disease and operative variables. In a sensitivity analysis, a propensity score-matched model explored the association between preoperative exposure to contrast and AKI in the first 48 h after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 5378 patients were included across 173 centres. Overall, 1249 patients (23·2 per cent) received intravenous contrast. The overall rate of AKI within 7 days of surgery was 13·4 per cent (718 of 5378). In the propensity score-matched model, preoperative exposure to contrast was not associated with AKI within 7 days (odds ratio (OR) 0·95, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 1·21; P = 0·669). The sensitivity analysis showed no association between preoperative contrast administration and AKI within 48 h after operation (OR 1·09, 0·84 to 1·41; P = 0·498).

CONCLUSION

There was no association between preoperative intravenous contrast administered for CT up to 7 days before surgery and postoperative AKI. Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy should not be used as a reason to avoid contrast-enhanced CT.

Increased fibrotic signaling in a murine model for intra-arterial contrast-induced acute kidney injury

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a vexing problem, and more than 70 million patients undergo studies using iodinated contrast. The molecular mechanisms responsible for CI-AKI are poorly understood. The goal of the present article was to determine the role of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)/mothers against decapentaplegic homolog (SMAD)3 and associated collagen expression in a murine model of intra-arterial CI-AKI. The murine model of CI-AKI after intra-arterial contrast agent administration was created by first performing a partial nephrectomy to induce chronic kidney disease. Twenty-eight days later, 100 μL of contrast agent [iodixanol (320 mg/mL)] or saline were administered via the carotid artery. Two days after contrast administration, compared with saline, average serum creatinine was significantly elevated (P < 0.05). In the cortex, there was a significant increase in phosphorylated SMAD3 and gene expression of TGF-β1, TGF-β receptor type I, and TGF-β receptor type II at day 2 in the contrast group compared with the saline group. Average gene expressions of connective tissue growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9, and collagen type I-α and type IV-α were significantly increased at 2 days after contrast administration (all P < 0.05). Moreover, there was a decrease in Ki-67 staining in the cortex, with an increase in terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling in the cortex and medulla after contrast administration (P < 0.05). In the murine intra-arterial CI-AKI model, there was increased hypoxia and TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway activation and collagen expression, resulting in renal fibrosis. Together, these results suggest that the TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway could be a potential target in alleviating tissue fibrosis in CI-AKI.

Does Exposure to Computed Tomography Contrast Media Increase Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease?

Background

There are many studies on acute kidney injury (AKI) after exposure to contrast media in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, whether the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) increases after exposure to contrast media in the long term, regardless of development of AKI after such exposure, has not been studied.

Material/Methods

The electronic health records of patients diagnosed with CKD and followed up from 2014 to 2018 at a tertiary university hospital were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into patients who progressed to ESRD (ESRD group) and those who did not (non-ESRD group). Patients in the non-ESRD group were matched 1: 1 to those in the ESRD group by using disease risk score generation and matching. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of contrast media exposure on progression to ESRD.

Results

In total, 179 patients were enrolled per group; 178 (99.4%) were in CKD stage 3 or above in both groups. Average serum creatinine was 4.31±3.02 mg/dl and 3.64±2.55 mg/dl in the ESRD and non-ESRD groups, respectively (p=0.242). Other baseline characteristics were not statistically significant, except for the number of times contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) was performed (0.00 [Interquartile range (IQR) 0.00–2.00] in the ESRD group and 0.00 [IQR 0.00–1.00] in the non-ESRD group [p=0.006]); in multivariate logistic regression, this number (OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.08–1.47, p=0.006) was significantly related to progression to ESRD.

Conclusions

The use of CECT increased the risk of ESRD 1.2-fold in advanced and stable CKD outpatients after 5-year follow-up.

Emergency Imaging in Pregnancy and Lactation [Formula: see text]

The use of diagnostic imaging studies in the emergency setting has increased dramatically over the past couple of decades. The emergency imaging of pregnant and lactating patients poses unique challenges and calls upon the crucial role of radiologists as consultants to the referring physician to guide appropriate use of imaging tests, minimize risk, ensure timely management, and occasionally alleviate unwarranted trepidation. A clear understanding of the risks and benefits involved with various imaging tests in this patient population is vital to achieve this. This review discusses the different safety and appropriateness issues that could arise with the use of ionizing radiation, iodinated-, and gadolinium-based contrast media and radiopharmaceuticals in pregnant and lactating patients. Special considerations such as trauma imaging, safety concerns with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound, management of claustrophobia, contrast extravasation, and allergic reactions are also reviewed. The consent process for these examinations has also been described.

Radiocontrast Toxicity

Intravenous and intraarterial contrast media are invaluable tools in the diagnosis of anatomic lesions. However, they have been associated with deleterious renal events, ranging from acute kidney injury (iodinated contrast) to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (gadolinium-containing agents). Contrast-associated acute kidney injury has a wide incidence, likely due to differences in populations studied, with incidence likely overstated due to comorbid conditions at the time of contrast exposure. Pathophysiology includes hemodynamic and direct toxic effects. Preventative strategies include intravenous saline administration, higher urine pH, and statin administration. Importantly, because of fears of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, practitioners may be selecting only the healthiest patients for contrast exposure. Gadolinium-based contrast agents may cause their toxicity through being unbound from their ligand, and certain preparations may be less harmful than others.

Negligible Risk of Acute Renal Failure Among Hospitalized Patients After Contrast-Enhanced Imaging With Iodinated Versus Gadolinium-Based Agents

INTRODUCTION

The potential adverse renal outcome among patients undergoing iodine-based contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) has been questioned recently, given the caution undertaken in patients' selection, hydration protocols, and the low radiocontrast volume, used with advanced imaging equipment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective assessment of renal outcome in 12,580 hospitalized patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT, compared with 754 patients subjected to gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging, with subsequent propensity matching for clinical characteristics and potential risk factors.

RESULTS

The risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) was found to be negligible as compared with patients undergoing enhanced magnetic resonance imaging studies, before and after propensity matching (8% vs 7.3% rate of AKI in the nonmatched iodine-based contrast agents [IBCAs] and gadolinium-based contrast agents [GBCAs], respectively, P = 0.3, and 7% in the matched IBCA group, P = 0.9), including comparisons among subgroups with well-defined risk factors such as chronic renal failure, diabetes, older age, and hypertension. However, lower systolic blood pressure before imaging was associated with higher risk to develop PC-AKI after IBCA administration but not with GBCA (for systolic blood pressure lower than 110 mm Hg, odds ratio for AKI after IBCA was 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.88, and after GBCA; odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.003-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

With the current precautions undertaken, the real-life risk of PC-AKI among inpatients undergoing CT is insignificant. Possible reasons for the diverse impact of blood pressure on the propensity to develop acute kidney failure after iodine-based but not gadolinium-based enhancement imaging are discussed.

Intravascular Iodinated Contrast Is an Independent Cause of Acute Kidney Injury Following Coronary Angiography

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have questioned whether intravascular iodinated contrast remains an independent cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). We sought to assess whether iodinated contrast administered during coronary angiography is an independent cause of AKI.

METHODS

We identified all of the patients who underwent coronary angiography between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017 with a discharge diagnosis of AKI that developed within 7 days following angiography. Using chart review, we categorized patients as having multifactorial AKI if ≥1 insults other than intravascular contrast potentially contributed to kidney injury or contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI) if the only insult was contrast administration. We compared the severity of AKI and renal function upon discharge between patients with CI-AKI and multifactorial AKI.

RESULTS

We identified 78 patients who experienced AKI within 7 days following angiography, 10 (13%) of whom had CI-AKI and 68 of whom (87%) experienced multifactorial AKI. Nine (90%) patients with CI-AKI manifested stage 1 disease, 1 (10%) had stage 2 disease, and 9 (90%) experienced full recovery of kidney function. More patients with multifactorial AKI developed stage 2 or 3 disease (42% vs 10%, χ² = 3.73, P = 0.05) and experienced either partial recovery of kidney function or persistent kidney impairment compared with patients with CI-AKI (25% vs 10%, χ² = 1.9, P = 0.17), although the latter comparison was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The intravascular administration of iodinated contrast remains an independent cause of AKI. Compared with those with multifactorial AKI, patients with CI-AKI appear to be more likely to experience mild decrements in kidney function that recover completely.

Incidence and risk of dialysis therapy within 30 days after contrast enhanced computed tomography in patients coded with chronic kidney disease: a nation-wide, population-based study

Background

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are considered at risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury and possible subsequent need for dialysis therapy. Computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly performed examination requiring intravenous iodinated contrast media (ICM) injection. The actual risk of dialysis in CKD patients undergoing CT with ICM remains controversial. Furthermore, it is also uncertain whether these at-risk patients can be identified by means of administrative data. Our study is conducted in order to determine the incidence and risk of dialysis within 30 days after undergoing contrast enhanced CT in CKD coded patients.

Methods

This longitudinal, nation-wide, populated-based study is carried out by analyzing the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database retrospectively. Patients coded under the diagnosis of CKD who underwent CT are identified within randomly selected one million subjects of the database. From January 2012 to December 2013, 487 patients had undergone CT with ICM. A total of 924 patients who underwent CT without ICM are selected as the control group. Patients with advanced CKD or intensive care unit (ICU) admissions are assigned to the subgroups for analysis. The primary outcome is measured by dialysis events within 30 days after undergoing CT scans. The cumulative incidence is assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. The risk of 30-day dialysis relative to the control group is analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model after adjusting for age, sex, and baseline comorbidities.

Results

The numbers and percentages of dialysis events within 30 days after undergoing CT scans are 20 (4.1%) in the CT with ICM group and 66 (7.1%) in the CT without ICM group (p = 0.03). However, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for 30-day dialysis was 0.84 (95% CI [0.46–1.54], p = 0.57), which is statistically non-significant. In both advanced CKD and ICU admission subgroups, there are also no significant differences in 30-day dialysis risks with the aHR of 1.12 (95% CI [0.38–3.33], p = 0.83) and 0.95 (95% CI [0.44–2.05], p = 0.90), respectively.

Conclusions

Within 30 days of receiving contrast-enhanced CT scans, 4.1% of CKD coded patients required dialysis, which appear to be lower compared with subjects who received non-contrast CT scans. However, no statistically significant difference is observed after adjustments are made for other baseline conditions. Thereby, the application of administrative data to identify patients with CKD cannot be viewed as a risk factor for the necessity to undergo dialysis within 30 days of receiving contrast-enhanced CT scans.

Association between intravenous contrast media exposure and non-recovery from dialysis-requiring septic acute kidney injury: a nationwide observational study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the association between the use of intravenous contrast and non-recovery from dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (AKI-D) and in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database between January 2011 and December 2016. We identified patients with septic AKI who began continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 2-days of admission and underwent computed tomography. We compared patients with AKI-D with and without the use of intravenous contrast for computed tomography and performed propensity score matching to adjust for confounders for the association between exposure to intravenous contrast and outcomes, including a composite outcome of in-hospital mortality and RRT dependence at discharge and RRT duration.

RESULTS

From 3782 and 6619 patients with septic AKI-D with and without intravenous contrast exposure, respectively, 3485 propensity score-matched pairs were generated. No significant differences were found in the outcomes between the propensity score-matched groups: a composite outcome of in-hospital mortality and RRT dependence, 49.6% vs. 50.2% (odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.88, 1.07); in-hospital mortality, 45.3% vs. 46.1% (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.87, 1.06); RRT dependence, 4.4% vs 4.1% (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.85, 1.31); and median (interquartile range) of RRT duration, 4 [2-11] days vs. 4 [2-11] days (P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

This large observational study did not support an association between intravenous contrast media and adverse in-hospital outcomes in patients with septic AKI-D. Further studies are warranted to assess the generalizability.

Influence of Clinical Factors on Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephrotoxicity From IV Iodinated Low-Osmolality Contrast Material in Patients With a Low Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to explore whether clinical factors historically associated with contrast material-causative kidney injury (contrast-induced nephrotoxicity [CIN]) increase risk after use of IV iodinated low-osmolality contrast material (LOCM) in patients with stage IIIb-V chronic kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective hypothesis-generating study, 1:1 propensity score matching was used to assess post-CT acute kidney injury (AKI) after unenhanced or contrast-enhanced CT in patients with stable estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; 1112 patients with an eGFR = 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m² and 86 patients with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² and no dialysis). Historical risk factors including diabetes mellitus, age more than 60 years, hypertension, loop diuretic use, hydrochlorothiazide use, and cardiovascular disease were evaluated for modulation of CIN risk. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed. RESULTS. Overall IV LOCM was an independent risk factor for post-CT AKI in patients with an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m² (odds ratio, 3.96 [95% CI, 1.29-12.21]; p = 0.016) but not in those with an eGFR of 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.24). In patients with an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m², the tested covariates did not significantly modify the risk of CIN (p = 0.096-0.832). In patients with an eGFR of 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m², risk of CIN emerged in those with cardiovascular disease (p = 0.015; number needed to harm from LOCM = 11 patients); the other tested cofactors had no significant effect (p = 0.108-0.822). CONCLUSION. CIN was observed when eGFR was less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m². In those with an eGFR of 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m², CIN was not observed with LOCM alone but was observed in the presence of cardiovascular disease. Other cofactors historically thought to increase CIN risk (e.g., diabetes mellitus) did not increase risk of CIN. Further study is needed to determine whether these exploratory results are true associations.

Nephrotoxicity of gadolinium-based contrast in the setting of renal artery intervention: retrospective analysis with 10-year follow-up

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine the incidence rate and potential risk factors for postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) as well as the long-term clinical implications on dialysis and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who underwent renal artery stent placement exclusively with gadolinium-based contrast agents.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 412 patients with CKD who underwent renal artery stent placement. Sixty-eight patients underwent intervention exclusively with gadolinium-based contrast agents and were analyzed. Criteria for PC-AKI included either an absolute serum creatinine increase >0.3 mg/dL or percentage increase in serum creatinine >50% within 48 hours of intervention. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PC-AKI. The cumulative proportion of patients who died or went on to hemodialysis was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of PC-AKI was 14.7%. The rate of AKI decreased for every 1 unit increase in glomerular filtration rate ( GFR, odds ratio [OR]=0.91, P = 0.047). Prehydration was associated with a lower PC-AKI rate (OR=0.17; P = 0.015). Acute kidney injury after intervention was associated with an increased rate of dialysis (Hazard ratio [HR]=4.51, P = 0.002) and mortality (HR=2.52; P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Gadolinium-based contrast agents are potentially nephrotoxic when used for endovascular intervention in patients with CKD. The risk of PC-AKI increased with lower GFR and decreased with prehydration. Dialysis and mortality risk were increased in patients who developed PC-AKI.

The impact of coronary angiography on renal transplant function

INTRODUCTION

There may be reluctance to perform coronary angiography in kidney transplant patients due to perceived risk of iodinated contrast, despite an increased risk of cardiovascular disease compared with the general population.

AIM

We sought to determine if renal transplant function was adversely affected within 7, 30 and 180 days of coronary angiography.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Renal transplant recipients undergoing coronary angiography in a single centre (01/2006-02/2018) were identified retrospectively. Baseline and highest SCr within 7, 30 and 180 days of coronary angiography were extracted from the electronic patient record. Rise in creatinine >26 micromol/l was considered significant [equivalent to Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Network criteria stage 1 AKI] and case note review performed to determine circumstance of renal decline.

RESULTS

There were 127 coronary angiographies conducted in 90 patients: 67.7% were male and mean age was 58.0 (±10.1) years. There was AKI within 7 days in 18.9% cases, but SCr returned to baseline within 7 days or there was an alternative explanation for AKI in 83.3% of these. In the remaining four cases, there was progressive decline in renal transplant function. In the absence of critical illness, no patient required dialysis or extended hospital stay for contrast-associated AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of renal transplant recipients undergoing coronary angiography, AKI occurred in a minority of cases, and in more than 95% of such cases this effect was transient, with progressive renal decline a rare and predictable event. Renal transplant should not be regarded as a contraindication to coronary angiography.

Impact of aortic wall thrombus on late changes in renal function among patients treated by fenestrated-branched endografts

OBJECTIVE

Renal function deterioration is an important determinant of mortality in patients treated for complex aortic aneurysms. We have previously determined that catheter and guidewire manipulation in diseased aortas during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) is associated with risk of renal function deterioration. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of atherothrombotic aortic wall thrombus (AWT) on renal function deterioration among patients treated by F-BEVAR for pararenal and extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

Clinical data of 212 patients treated for complex aortic aneurysms with F-BEVAR were entered into a prospectively maintained database (2007-2015). AWT was evaluated by computed tomography angiography using volumetric measurements in nonaneurysmal aortic segments. AWT was classified as mild, moderate, or severe using objective assessment of the number of affected segments, thrombus type, thickness, area, and circumference. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined using Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage renal disease (RIFLE) criteria, and renal function deterioration was defined by a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30% from baseline. Patient survival and renal outcomes were assessed at dismissal, at 6 to 8 weeks, at 6 months, and annually, including AKI, serum creatinine concentration, eGFR, chronic kidney disease stage, need for renal replacement therapy, and presence of kidney infarction.

RESULTS

There were 169 male (80%) and 43 female (20%) patients with a mean age of 75 ± 7 years. Aneurysm extent was pararenal in 157 patients and extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in 55 patients. A total of 700 renal-mesenteric arteries were incorporated (3.1 ± 1 vessels/patient). AWT was classified as mild in 98 patients (46%), moderate in 75 (35%), and severe in 39 (19%). At 30 days, 45 patients (21%) developed AKI. Decline in eGFR and kidney infarction were associated with higher AWT volume index and severe AWT classification (P < .05). There was no association of AWT with 30-day mortality, which was 0.5% for the entire cohort. Mean follow-up was 29 ± 23 months. Freedom from renal function deterioration was 73% ± 6% for mild, 81% ± 6% for moderate, and 66% ± 8% for severe AWT patients at 3 years (P = .012) and 46% ± 9% and 82% ± 4% for those with or without AKI after the initial procedure (P < .001). Overall, 41 patients (19%) had progression of chronic kidney disease stage, but none of the patients required renal replacement therapy. Survival was 73% ± 5% for mild, 72% ± 6% for moderate, and 69% ± 10% for severe AWT patients at 3 years (P = .67).

CONCLUSIONS

AWT is a significant predictor of AKI and continued decline in renal function after the initial F-BEVAR procedure. Longer follow-up time is needed to determine the actual impact of AWT on survival.

Bilateral Sustained Nephrograms After Parenteral Administration of Iodinated Contrast Material: A Potential Biomarker for Acute Kidney Injury, Dialysis, and Mortality

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether persistent bilateral global nephrograms are associated with acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis, and mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent (1) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or cardiac catheterization with iohexol between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014, and (2) noncontrast abdominal CT in the subsequent 24±6 hours were identified. Patients without preprocedure and postprocedure creatinine measurements or who received additional contrast material were excluded. Nephrograms were identified by radiologist review and CT attenuation measurements. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine nephrogram risk factors. Acute kidney injury (defined as a creatinine level of ≥0.5 mg/dL or Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stages 1-3), dialysis, and mortality proportions were compared between patients with and without bilateral global nephrograms using the Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients met all inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients with a nephrogram was 37.4% (n=46), with a higher proportion following interventional (67% [18 of 30]) vs diagnostic (27.3% [9 of 33]) catheterization or contrast-enhanced computed tomography (31.7% [19 of 60]). Age (P=.002), chronic kidney disease (P=.05), and acute hypotension or shock (P=.02) were significant risk factors for nephrogram development. Patients with nephrogram had significantly higher rates of AKI (37.0% [17 of 46] vs 5.2% [4 of 77]; odds ratio [OR], 10.7 [95% CI, 3.31-34.5]; P<.001), dialysis (17.4% [8 of 46] vs 1.3% [1 of 77]; OR, 16.0 [95% CI, 1.93-133]; P=.001), and mortality (15.2% [7 of 46] vs 1.3% [1 of 77]; OR, 13.6 [1.62-115]; P=.003) than patients without nephrogram.

CONCLUSION

The presence of persistent bilateral global nephrograms suggests an increased risk of AKI, dialysis, and mortality when compared with patients whose kidneys fully eliminated the contrast material.

Noninvasive aortic imaging

Non-invasive imaging of the aorta has undergone considerable advancements in recent times; largely driven by the technological advances in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This review article highlights these recent advancements and discusses the current role of different imaging tools in the management of aortic diseases.

Post-contrast acute kidney injury - Part 1: Definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors : Recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines

Purpose

The Contrast Media Safety Committee (CMSC) of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) has updated its 2011 guidelines on the prevention of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI). The results of the literature review and the recommendations based on it, which were used to prepare the new guidelines, are presented in two papers.

Areas covered in part 1

Topics reviewed include the terminology used, the best way to measure eGFR, the definition of PC-AKI, and the risk factors for PC-AKI, including whether the risk with intravenous and intra-arterial contrast medium differs.

Key Points

• PC-AKI is the preferred term for renal function deterioration after contrast medium.

• PC-AKI has many possible causes.

• The risk of AKI caused by intravascular contrast medium has been overstated.

• Important patient risk factors for PC-AKI are CKD and dehydration.