Population-Based Evaluation of Total Protein in Cerebrospinal Fluid

Inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid markers in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 69 studies with 5710 participants

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence of immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation occurring in schizophrenia. The aim of this study is to combine studies on routine CSF parameters, as well as cytokines and inflammatory proteins, in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

METHODS

CSF parameters were summated and inverse variance meta-analyses using a random effects model were performed comparing mean difference or odds ratios. Between study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Quality assessment and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

There were 69 studies of 5710 participants, including 3180 individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Averaged CSF parameters were within normal limits, however, between 3.1 % and 23.5 % of individual cases with schizophrenia spectrum disorders had an abnormal CSF result: Protein (abnormal in 23.5 % cases), albumin (in 18.5 %), presence of oligoclonal bands (in 9.3 %), white blood cell count (in 3.6 %), and IgG levels (3.1 %). Meta-analysis of 55 studies with non-psychiatric controls demonstrated a significant increase in CSF total protein (MD: 3.50, CI: 0.12-6.87), albumin ratio (MD: 0.55, CI: 0.02-0.09), white cell count (MD: 0.25, CI: 0.05-0.46), IL-6 (SMD: 0.53, CI: 0.29 to 0.77) and IL-8 (SMD: 0.56, CI: 0.11 to 1.01). Sensitivity analysis did not alter findings.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal CSF parameters, cytokines and inflammatory proteins were found in a significant proportion of individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This may indicate alterations to blood brain barrier function and permeability, CSF flow dynamics or neuroinflammation. Further research is needed to explore these potential mechanisms.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System (PACNS)

The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System (PACNS), developed according to ESO standard operating procedures (SOP) and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, was elaborated to assist clinicians in the diagnostic and treatment pathway of patients with PACNS in their decision making. A working group involving vascular neurologists, neuroradiologists, rheumatologists, a neuropathologist and a methodologist identified 17 relevant clinical questions; these were addressed according to the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) framework and systematic literature reviews were performed. Notably, each PICO was addressed with respect to large vessel (LV)-PACNS and small vessel (SV)-PACNS. Data to answer many questions were scarce or lacking and the quality of evidence was very low overall, so, for some PICOs, the recommendations reflect the ongoing uncertainty. When the absence of sufficient evidence precluded recommendations, Expert Consensus Statements were formulated. In some cases, this applied to interventions in the diagnosis and treatment of PACNS which are embedded widely in clinical practice, for example patterns of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) abnormalities. CSF analysis for hyperproteinorrachia and pleocytosis does not have evidence supporting their use as diagnostic tools. The working group recommended that caution is employed in the interpretation of non-invasive vascular imaging due to lack of validation and the different sensitivities in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and histopathological analyses. Moreover, there is not a neuroimaging pattern specific for PACNS and neurovascular issues are largely underreported in PACNS patients. The group's recommendations on induction and maintenance of treatment and for primary or secondary prevention of vascular events also reflect uncertainty due to lack of evidence. Being uncertain the role and practical usefulness of current diagnostic criteria and being not comparable the main treatment strategies, it is suggested to have a multidisciplinary team approach in an expert center during both work up and management of patients with suspected PACNS. Highlighting the limitations of the currently accepted diagnostic criteria, we hope to facilitate the design of multicenter, prospective clinical studies and trials. A standardization of neuroimaging techniques and reporting to improve the level of evidence underpinning interventions employed in the diagnosis and management of PACNS. We anticipate that this guideline, the first comprehensive European guideline on PACNS management using GRADE methodology, will assist clinicians to choose the most effective management strategy for PACNS.