Symptoms of schizophrenia: Normal adaptations to inability

The Effects of Probiotic and Selenium Co-supplementation on Clinical and Metabolic Scales in Chronic Schizophrenia: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

This study evaluated the effects of probiotic and selenium co-supplementation on clinical and metabolic symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted among 60 people with chronic schizophrenia to receive either 8 × 10⁹ CFU/day probiotic plus 200 μg/day selenium (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for 12 weeks. Probiotic and selenium co-supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in the general Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score (β - 1.29; 95% CI, - 2.48, - 0.10; P = 0.03) compared with the placebo. Compared with the placebo, probiotic and selenium co-supplementation resulted in a significant elevation in total antioxidant capacity (β 91.09 mmol/L; 95% CI, 35.89, 146.30; P = 0.002) and total glutathione (β 96.50 μmol/L; 95% CI, 26.13, 166.87; P = 0.008) and a significant reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (β - 1.44 mg/L; 95% CI, - 2.22, - 0.66; P = 0.001). Additionally, co-supplementation significantly decreased fasting glucose (β - 7.40 mg/dL; 95% CI, - 10.15, - 4.64; P < 0.001), insulin levels (β - 1.46 μIU/mL; 95% CI, - 2.35, - 0.57; P = 0.002), and homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance (β - 0.51; 95% CI, - 0.72, - 0.29; P < 0.001) and a significant increase in quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (β 0.01; 95% CI, 0.006, 0.01; P < 0.001) compared with the placebo. Probiotic and selenium co-supplementation for 12 weeks to patients with chronic schizophrenia had beneficial effects on the general PANSS score and some metabolic profiles. http://www.irct.ir , identifier IRCT20170513033941N41.

Effect of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) supplementation on positive and negative syndrome scale in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of NAC supplementation on positive and negative syndrome scale in schizophrenia.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted, and studies were identified by a search of electronic databases from inception to May 2018. Combined and stratified analyses were used.

RESULTS

Seven trials were identified, and data from n = 447 participants were included. Pooled analysis showed improvement of positive and negative syndrome scale following NAC treatment compared with placebo, for total (SMB = - 0.96) [95% CI - 1.69, - 0.24; P = 0.009], general (SMB = - 1.04) [95% CI - 1.80, - 0.27; P = 0.008] and negative (SMB = - 0.73) [95% CI - 1.29, - 0.17; P = 0.01] scores, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found, and subgroup analysis showed significant reductions in studies with a treatment duration of ≤ 24 weeks, with a considerable effect size on total, general, and negative scores (Total SMD = - 0.83; General SMD = - 0.67; Negative SMD = - 1.09) following NAC.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC improved all aspects of positive and negative syndrome scale in schizophrenic populations and may be more efficacious with treatment durations up to 24 weeks.

Therapeutic effect of adjunctive N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) on symptoms of chronic schizophrenia: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is one of the most disabling psychiatric syndromes with the prevalence of 1% in the general population. Despite availability of various antipsychotics, negative symptoms and cognitive impairment are difficult to treat. In addition antipsychotic monotherapy is not effective in most of these patients. Current evidence indicates the roles of glutamatergic system in this disorder. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) also increases extracellular glutamate. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical effects of oral NAC as an add-on to maintenance medication for the treatment of chronic schizophrenia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial was performed to determine the effectiveness of 1200mg N-acetyl cysteine as an adjunctive treatment with conventional antipsychotic medications in 84 patients with chronic schizophrenia. The subjects were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and a standard neuropsychological screening test. Data were analyzed with SPSS-16 software.

RESULTS

NAC-treated patients showed significantly improvement in the positive (F=5.47, P=0.02) and negative (F=0.20, df=1) PANSS subscale. Also the general and total PANSS score of NAC group declined over times whilst it was increased for placebo group. Regarding cognitive functions, improvement was observed in some explored areas, such as attention, short-term and working memory, executive functioning and speed of processing. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the frequency of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The present study detected improvement in positive, negative, general and total psychopathology symptoms as well as cognitive performance with NAC treatment. It is also well-tolerated, safe and easy-to-use agent as an effective therapeutic strategy to improve outcome in schizophrenia treatment.

Comprehension of metaphors in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

Metaphors, mainly proverbs and idiomatic expressions of ordinary life are commonly used as a model for concretism. Previous studies have shown impaired metaphor comprehension in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders compared to either psychiatric or non-psychiatric control subject. The aim of this study was to detect possible quantitative differences in figurative processing between patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and healthy controls.

METHODS

In order to analyse possible dissociations of different aspects of figurative speech, a range of metaphor tasks was used to distinguish between recognition of familiar metaphors, paraphrasing the meaning of the latter and generating novel metaphors: we used a standard proverb test for conventional metaphors consisting of a multiple-choice and a paraphrasing task, and the Metaphoric Triads Test for the assessment of novel metaphors. We included 40 patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and 43 healthy control subjects.

RESULTS

Our results showed that patients had impaired figurative speech processing regarding novel and conventional metaphors. Associations with cognitive functions were detected. Performance on the paraphrasing task was associated with the severity of negative symptoms.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders do exhibit impairments in the recognition and paraphrasing of conventional and the generation of novel metaphors and that some cognitive domains as well the extent of negative symptoms might be associated with these deficits.

The meaning of antipsychotic medication to patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To explore the meaning of taking antipsychotic medication in a population with schizophrenia.

METHOD

A literature review of publications on the meaning of medication was conducted using PsycINFO, Medline, and SOCINDEX databases (2001-2012) and search terms attitude or meaning plus antipsychotics or neuroleptics. Based on this search, 110 articles were found, 60 of which were judged relevant to the goal of this article. A recently published expert consensus guideline was also used to better understand current thinking about medication adherence issues in patients with severe mental illness. Quotations from patients attending a women's clinic for psychosis were used to expand on themes found in the literature.

RESULTS

Themes extracted from the reviewed literature fell into three main categories: a) control by and of medication, b) dependence on medication and on the prescriber, and c) stigma resulting from medication use. These themes contrast with the usual medical associations with medication (e.g., symptom relief or side effects).

CONCLUSION

Shared discussion of beliefs about medication between patient and care provider allows wider exploration of personal meanings that can help establish therapeutic relationships and integrate psychological therapy with psychopharmacology.

Critical appraisal of lurasidone in the management of schizophrenia

Lurasidone is a new atypical antipsychotic in the benzoisothiazoles class of chemicals. Like most second-generation antipsychotics it is a full antagonist at dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors, and is a partial agonist at 5-HT(1A) receptors, a property shared by some but not all older agents. It has much greater affinity for 5-HT(7) subtype receptors than other atypical antipsychotics. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that lurasidone is reasonably rapidly absorbed, with bioavailability appearing to be increased by food. Lurasidone undergoes extensive metabolism to a number of metabolites, some of which retain pharmacological activities. Metabolism is mainly by CYP3A4, resulting in steady-state concentrations that vary between individuals and are potentially affected by strong inducers and inhibitors of this enzyme. Short-term clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of lurasidone in acute schizophrenia, with doses of 40 and 80 mg/day giving significant improvements from baseline in the PANSS and BPRS scores. The most common adverse events are nausea, vomiting, akathisia, dizziness, and sedation, with minimal increases in the risk of developing metabolic syndrome. Lurasidone did not raise the risk of QTc interval prolongation, although additional studies are required. Long-term trials are also needed to assess the risk of new-onset diabetes. Ongoing trials in patients with bipolar disorder are being completed but, again, efficacy and safety have been investigated only in a few short-term clinical trials.

New atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia: iloperidone

The optimal treatment of schizophrenia poses a challenge to develop more effective treatments and safer drugs, to overcome poor compliance, discontinuation and frequent switching with available antipsychotics. Iloperidone is a new dopamine type 2/serotonin type 2A (D(2)/5-HT(2A)) antagonist structurally related to risperidone, expected to give better efficacy with less extrapyramidal symptoms than D(2) receptor antagonist antipsychotics. In double-blind phase III trials iloperidone reduced the symptoms of schizophrenia at oral doses from 12 to 24 mg. It was more effective than placebo in reducing positive and negative syndrome total score and Brief Psychiatric Rating scale scores; it was as effective as haloperidol and risperidone in post-hoc analysis. Its long-term efficacy was equivalent to that of haloperidol. The most common adverse events were dizziness, dry mouth, dyspepsia and somnolence, with few extrapyramidal symptoms and metabolic changes in short- and long-term studies in adults. Akathisia was rare, but prolongation of the corrected QT (QTc) interval was comparable to haloperidol and ziprasidone, which is of particular concern. Further comparative studies are needed to clarify the benefit/risk profile of iloperidone and its role in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Long-term efficacy and safety of iloperidone: results from 3 clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia

This research compared the long-term efficacy and safety of iloperidone with those of haloperidol in individuals with schizophrenia. Data were pooled from 3 prospective multicenter studies, each with 6-week stabilization followed by 46-week double-blind maintenance phases. Patients were randomized to iloperidone 4 to 16 mg/d or haloperidol 5 to 20 mg/d. Patients included in this analysis completed the initial 6-week phase with at least 20% reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at weeks 4 and 6, had 7-item Clinical Global Impressions of Change (CGI-C) scores less than 4, received 1 or more doses of long-term phase medication, and had 1 or more efficacy/safety assessments during the long-term phase. The primary efficacy variable was time to relapse, defined as a 25% or more increase in PANSS total score, including at least a 10-point change; discontinuation because of lack of efficacy; aggravated psychosis with hospitalization; or 2-point increase in the 7-item CGI-C after week 6. Of 1644 patients randomized and 1326 completing the 6-week phase, 473 (iloperidone, n = 359; haloperidol, n = 114) were included in the long-term efficacy analysis, and 489 (iloperidone, n = 371; haloperidol, n = 118) in the safety analysis. Iloperidone was equivalent to haloperidol in time to relapse. The most common adverse events were insomnia (18.1%), anxiety (10.8%), and schizophrenia aggravated (8.9%) with iloperidone, and insomnia (16.9%), akathisia (14.4%), tremor (12.7%), and muscle rigidity (12.7%) with haloperidol. The Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale scores improved with iloperidone and worsened with haloperidol. Metabolic changes were minimal for both groups. Mean changes in Fridericia's QT interval correction were 10.3 msec (iloperidone) and 9.4 msec (haloperidol) at end point. Iloperidone demonstrated long-term efficacy equivalent to haloperidol and a favorable long-term safety profile, potentially making this agent a suitable option as maintenance therapy for schizophrenia.