Is ivabradine suitable to control undesirable tachycardia induced by dobutamine in cardiogenic shock treatment?

Medical therapy of cardiogenic shock: Contemporary use of inotropes and vasopressors

Cardiogenic shock is a primary cardiac disorder that results in both clinical and biochemical evidence of tissue hypoperfusion and can lead to multi-organ failure and death depending on its severity. Inadequate cardiac contractility or cardiac power secondary to acute myocardial infarction remains the most frequent cause of cardiogenic shock, although its contribution has declined over the past two decades, compared with other causes. Despite some advances in cardiogenic shock management, this clinical syndrome is still burdened by an extremely high mortality. Its management is based on immediate stabilization of haemodynamic parameters so that further treatment, including mechanical circulatory support and transfer to specialized tertiary care centres, can be accomplished. With these aims, medical therapy, consisting mainly of inotropic drugs and vasopressors, still has a major role. The purpose of this article is to review current evidence on the use of these medications in patients with cardiogenic shock and discuss specific clinical settings with indications to their use.

Physiological effects of ivabradine in heart failure and beyond

Ivabradine is a pharmacologic agent that inhibits the funny current responsible for determining heart rate in the sinoatrial node. Ivabradine's clinical potential has been investigated in the context of heart failure since it is associated with reduced myocardial oxygen demand, enhanced diastolic filling, stroke volume, and coronary perfusion time; however, it is yet to demonstrate definitive mortality benefit. Alternative effects of ivabradine include modulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic activation, and endothelial function. Here, we review key clinical trials informing the clinical use of ivabradine and explore opportunities for leveraging its potential pleiotropic effects in other diseases, including treatment of hyperadrenergic states and mitigating complications of COVID-19 infection.

Ivabradine in the management of COVID-19-related cardiovascular complications: A perspective

Abstract:

Besides acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute cardiac injury is a major complication in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associates with a poor clinical outcome. Acute cardiac injury with COVID-19 can be of various etiologies, including myocardial ischemia or infarction and myocarditis, and may compromise cardiac function, resulting in acute heart failure or cardiogenic shock. Systemic inflammatory response increases heart rate (HR), which disrupts the myocardial oxygen supply/demand balance and worsens cardiac energy efficiency, thus further deteriorating the cardiac performance of the injured myocardium. In fact, the combination of elevated resting HR and markers of inflammation synergistically predicts adverse cardiovascular prognosis. Thus, targeted HR reduction may potentially be of benefit in cardiovascular pathologies associated with COVID-19. Ivabradine is a drug that selectively reduces HR via If current inhibition in the sinoatrial node without a negative effect on inotropy. Besides selective HR reduction, ivabradine was found to exert various beneficial pleiotropic effects, either HR-dependent or HR-independent, including anti-inflammatory, anti-atherosclerotic, anti-oxidant and antiproliferative actions and the attenuation of endothelial dysfunction and neurohumoral activation. Cardioprotection by ivabradine has already been indicated in cardiovascular pathologies that are prevalent with COVID-19, including myocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, cardiogenic shock or cardiac dysautonomia. Here, we suggest that ivabradine may be beneficial in the management of COVID-19-related cardiovascular complications.

Effects of vasopressors on circulation in the porcine abdominal island flap model

BACKGROUND

During reconstructive surgical procedures, systemic vasopressors are frequently used to maintain normal blood pressure. However, questions have arisen regarding the pharmacologic effects of vasopressors on flap circulation. Many plastic surgeons have expressed concern about the possibility of impaired flap circulation caused by the vasoconstrictive effect of the drugs. However, the opposing argument exists that the increase in mean arterial pressure from vasoactive agents may improve flap perfusion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of commonly used vasopressors on flap circulation.

METHODS

The vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) island flap was raised in five female pigs (38.2∼40.7 kg). Hemodynamic parameters were measured continuously by a carotid arterial catheter. A bi-directional transonic vascular doppler flow probe and Laser Doppler perfusion monitor (LDPM) unit were applied to record the continuous change in pedicle artery flow and microvascular perfusion following intravenous administration of dopamine (3, 5, 10µg/kg/minute), dobutamine (1.25, 2.5, 5µg/kg/minute), and norepinephrine (0.05, 0.1, 0.2µg/kg/minute).

RESULTS

Both microvascular perfusion and pedicle flow were generally proportional to the mean arterial pressure, and all three vasopressors improved flap perfusion and pedicle flow without deleterious effects. Norepinephrine showed the highest microvascular perfusion and dobutamine showed the highest pedicle flow rate. The mean blood pressure was the only statistically significant factor to affect both microvascular perfusion and pedicle flow (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our results strongly suggest that the foremost three vasopressors can be used for flap surgery without deterioration, and that the maintenance of adequate systemic blood pressure is crucial for good flap circulation.

Ivabradine in acute heart failure: Effects on heart rate and hemodynamic parameters in a randomized and controlled swine trial

BACKGROUND

Acute heart failure patients could benefit from heart rate reduction, as myocardial consumption and oxidative stress are related to tachycardia. Ivabradine could have a clinical role attenuating catecholamine-induced tachycardia. The aim of this study was to evaluate hemodynamic effects of ivabradine in a swine model of acute heart failure.

METHODS

Myocardial infarction was induced by 45 min left anterior descending artery balloon occlusion in 18 anesthetized pigs. An infusion of dobutamine and noradrenaline was maintained aiming to preserve adequate hemodynamic support, accompanied by fluid administration to obtain a pulmonary wedged pressure ≥ 18 mmHg. After reperfusion, rhythm and hemodynamic stabilization, the animals were randomized to 0.3 mg/kg ivabradine intravenously (n = 9) or placebo (n = 9). Hemodynamic parameters were observed over a 60 min period.

RESULTS

Ivabradine was associated with a significant reduction in heart rate (88.4 ± 12.0 bpm vs. 122.7 ± 17.3 bpm after 15 min of ivabradine/placebo infusion, p < 0.01) and an increase in stroke volume (68.8 ± 13.7 mL vs. 52.4 ± 11.5 mL after 15 min, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in systemic or pulmonary arterial pressure, or significant changes in pulmonary capillary pressure. However, after 15 min, cardiac output was significantly reduced with ivabradine (-5.2% vs. +15.0% variation in ivabradine/placebo group, p = 0.03), and central venous pressure increased (+4.2% vs. -19.7% variation, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ivabradine reduces heart rate and increases stroke volume without modifying systemic or left filling pressures in a swine model of acute heart failure. However, an excessive heart rate reduction could lead to a decrease in cardiac output and an increase in right filling pressures. Future studies with specific heart rate targets are needed.

Ivabradine: A Review of Labeled and Off-Label Uses

Ivabradine is a unique medication recently approved in the USA for the treatment of select heart failure patients. It was first approved for use in several countries around the world over a decade ago as an anti-anginal agent, with subsequent approval for use in heart failure patients. Since ivabradine has selective activity blocking the I f currents in the sinus node, it can reduce heart rate without appreciable effects on blood pressure. Given this heart-rate-specific effect, it has been investigated in many off-label indications as an alternative to traditional heart-rate-reducing medications such as beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. We conducted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar for ivabradine, heart failure, HFrEF, HFpEF, angina, coronary artery disease, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, postural orthostatic hypotension, coronary computed tomography angiography and atrial fibrillation. We reviewed and included studies, case reports, and case series published between 1980 and June 2016 if they provided information relevant to the practicing clinician. In many cases, larger clinical trials are needed to solidify the benefit of ivabradine, although studies indicate benefit in most therapeutic areas explored to date. The purpose of this paper is to review the current labeled and off-label uses of ivabradine, with a focus on clinical trial data.

Reversing dobutamine-induced tachycardia using ivabradine increases stroke volume with neutral effect on cardiac energetics in left ventricular post-ischaemia dysfunction

AIM

Compensatory tachycardia can potentially be deleterious in acute heart failure. In this study, we tested a therapeutic strategy of combined inotropic support (dobutamine) and selective heart rate (HR) reduction through administration of ivabradine.

METHODS

In an open-chest pig model (n = 12) with left ventricular (LV) post-ischaemia dysfunction, cardiac function was assessed by LV pressure catheter and sonometric crystals. Coronary flow and blood samples from the coronary sinus were used to measure myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2 ). LV energetics was assessed by comparing MVO2 with cardiac work at a wide range of workloads.

RESULTS

In the post-ischaemia heart, dobutamine (5 μg kg(-1)  min(-1) ) increased cardiac output (CO) by increasing HR from 102 ± 21 to 131 ± 16 bpm (beats per min; P < 0.05). Adding ivabradine (0.5 mg kg(-1) ) slowed HR back to 100 ± 9 bpm and increased stroke volume from 30 ± 5 to 36 ± 5 mL (P < 0.05) by prolonging diastolic filling time and increasing end-diastolic dimensions. Adding ivabradine had no adverse effects on CO, mean arterial pressure and cardiac efficiency. Similar findings on efficiency and LV function were also seen using an ex vivo working mouse heart protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined infusion of dobutamine and ivabradine had a neutral effect on post-ischaemia LV efficiency and increased left ventricular output without an increase in HR.

Clinical Experience with Ivabradine in Acute Heart Failure

Objective: Ivabradine has been shown to improve symptoms and to reduce rehospitalization and mortality in patients with severe chronic heart failure (HF). Its indication in acute HF is not clear. Acute HF patients could also benefit from HR reduction, as myocardial consumption and oxidative stress are related to tachycardia. Moreover, beta-blockers are contraindicated in cardiogenic shock and should not be initiated with congestive signs. Accordingly, we evaluated the role of ivabradine in acute HF patients. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 29 consecutive patients treated for acute HF in the Cardiac ICU, and for whom ivabradine was initiated during hospitalization between January 2011 and January 2014. All patients were in sinus rhythm and had a heart rate (HR) >70 bpm. Catecholamine use was necessary in 16 patients (57.1%) during the hospitalization, in 14 (87.5%) of these before ivabradine treatment. Results: Systolic blood pressure showed no variation during the first 24 h of ivabradine administration or at discharge. HR showed an absolute reduction of 10 bpm at 6 h (p < 0.001), 11 bpm at 24 h (p = 0.004) and 19 bpm (p < 0.001) at discharge. No episodes of significant bradycardia or hypotension were recorded after starting the drug. Conclusions: HR reduction with ivabradine in acute HF is well tolerated. It represents an attractive option, especially when there is excessive catecholamine-related tachycardia; this should be appropriately evaluated in randomized trials.

Ivabradine in Management of Heart Failure: a Critical Appraisal

Elevated resting heart rate has been linked to poor outcomes in patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Blockade of funny current channel with ivabradine reduces heart rate without inotropic effects. Ivabradine was recently approved by US Food and Drug Administration for patients with stable, symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 %, who are in sinus rhythm with resting heart rate (HR) ≥ 70 bpm and either are on maximally tolerated doses of beta-blockers, or have a contraindication to beta-blockers. This article will review and evaluate the data supporting the use of ivabradine in patients with HF and explore its mechanisms and physiologic effects.

Ivabradine: Heart Failure and Beyond

Heart failure affects over 5 million people in the United States and carries a high rate of mortality. Ivabradine, a new agent has been added to the current medical options for managing heart failure. It is a selective funny current (If) inhibitor in sinoatrial node and slows its firing rate, prolonging diastolic depolarization without a negative inotropic effect. Ivabradine was only recently approved by Food and Drug administration after the results of Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the If Inhibitor Ivabradine (SHIFT) trial, for a reduction in rehospitalizations from chronic heart failure. This trial assessed patients with stable heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and a heart rate of at least 70 beats per minute at rest on maximally tolerated beta-blocker therapy and demonstrated statistically significant reduction in heart failure hospitalization and deaths. Additionally, ivabradine has been associated with reduced cardiac remodeling, reduced heart rate variability, improvement in exercise tolerance, improved heart failure class of New York Heart Association, and better quality of life. It has also been tried in other conditions, such as inappropriate sinus tachycardia and cardiogenic shock, and is currently in phase II trial for patients with newly diagnosed multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

Ivabradine during cardiogenic shock: a clinical case and review of the literature

Although the introduction of novel medical and invasive therapies in recent years has led to a significant reduction in mortality from heart failure, the same cannot be said for mortality due to cardiogenic shock. Drug therapy with inotropic agents and catecholamines has the disadvantage of causing increased myocardial oxygen consumption resulting in increased heart rate which may lead to the widening of the ischemic area. A reduction in heart rate with the administration of β-blockers is contraindicated due to negative inotropic and blood pressure lowering effects, typical of this group of drugs. Thus the theoretical possibility of ivabradine administration for an isolated reduction in heart rate, associated with the absence of a negative inotropic effect, could favorably influence hemodynamics in patients with cardiogenic shock. We report a case of cardiogenic shock treated by adding ivabradine to the currently used therapy.

Hemodynamic effects of Ivabradine in addition to dobutamine in patients with severe systolic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine induced tachycardia increases myocardial oxygen consumption and impairs ventricular filling. We hypothesized that Ivabradine may be efficient to control dobutamine induced tachycardia.

METHODS

We assessed the effects of Ivabradine in addition to dobutamine in stable heart failure (HF) patients (LVEF < 35%, n = 22, test population) and validated its effects in refractory cardiogenic shock patients (n = 9, validation population) with contraindication to cardiac assistance or transplant. In the test population (62 ± 17 years, LVEF = 24 ± 8%), systolic and diastolic function were assessed at rest and under dobutamine [10 γ/min], before and after Ivabradine [5mg per os]. In the validation population (54 ± 11 years, LVEF = 22 ± 7%), Ivabradine [5mg twice a day] was added to the dobutamine infusion.

RESULTS

In the test population, Ivabradine decreased heart rate [HR] at rest and during dobutamine echocardiography (-9 ± 8 bpm, P = 0.0004). The decrease in HR was associated with a decrease in cardiac power output and an increase in diastolic duration at rest (+ 74 ± 67 ms, P = 0.0002), and during dobutamine infusion (+ 75 ± 67 ms, P < 0.0001). Change in LVEF during dobutamine was greater after Ivabradine treatment than before (+ 7.2 ± 4.7% vs. + 3.6 ± 4.2%, P = 0.002). In the validation population, Ivabradine decreased HR (-18 ± 11 bpm, P = 0.008) and improved diastolic filling time (+ 67 ± 42 ms, P = 0.012) without decreasing cardiac output. At 24h, Ivabradine improved systolic blood pressure (+ 9 ± 5 mmHg, P = 0.007), daily urine output (+ 0.7 ± 0.5L, P = 0.008), oxygen balance (ΔScv02 = + 13 ± 15%, P = 0.010), and NT-pro BNP (-2270 ± 1912 pg/mL, P = 0.017). Finally, only 2/9 (22%) patients died whereas expected mortality determined from a historical cohort was 78% (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrates the safety and potential benefit of a HR lowering agent in cardiogenic shock.