Use of flow cytometry for rapid and accurate enumeration of live pathogenic Leptospira strains

A flow cytometry method for safe detection of bacterial viability

Flow cytometry is a relevant tool to meet the requirements of academic and industrial research projects aimed at estimating the features of a bacterial population (e.g., quantity, viability, activity). One of the remaining challenges is now the safe assessment of bacterial viability while minimizing the risks inherent to existing protocols. In our core facility at the Paris-Saclay University, we have addressed this issue with two objectives: measuring bacterial viability in biological samples and preventing bacterial contamination and chemical exposure of the staff and cytometers used on the platform. Here, we report the development of a protocol achieving these two objectives, including a viability labeling step before bacteria fixation, which removes the risk of biological exposure, and the decrease of the use of reagents such as propidium iodide (PI), which are dangerous for health (CMR: carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic). For this purpose, we looked for a non-CMR viability dye that can irreversibly label dead bacteria before fixation procedures and maintain intense fluorescence after further staining. We decided to test on the bacteria, eFluor Fixable Viability dyes, which are usually used on eukaryotic cells. Since the bacteria had size and granularity characteristics very similar to those associated with flow cytometry background signals, a step of bacterial DNA labeling with SYTO or DRAQ5 was necessarily added to differentiate them from the background. Three marker combinations (viability-DNA) were tested on LSR Fortessa and validated on pure bacterial populations (Gram+ , Gram- ) and polybacterial cultures. Any of the three methods can be used and adapted to the needs of each project and allow users to adapt the combination according to the configuration of their cytometer. Having been tested on six bacterial populations, validated on two cytometers, and repeated at least two times in each evaluated condition, we consider this method reliable in the context of these conditions. The reliability of the results obtained in flow cytometry was successfully validated by applying this protocol to confocal microscopy, permeabilization, and also to follow cultures over time. This flow cytometry protocol for measuring bacterial viability under safer conditions also opens the prospect of its use for further bacterial characterization.

Simultaneous enumeration of yeast and bacterial cells in the context of industrial bioprocesses

In scenarios where yeast and bacterial cells coexist, it is of interest to simultaneously quantify the concentrations of both cell types, since traditional methods used to determine these concentrations individually take more time and resources. Here, we compared different methods for quantifying the fuel ethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2 yeast strain and cells from the probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain in microbial suspensions. Individual suspensions were prepared, mixed in 1:1 or 100:1 yeast-to-bacteria ratios, covering the range typically encountered in sugarcane biorefineries, and analyzed using bright field microscopy, manual and automatic Spread-plate and Drop-plate counting, flow cytometry (at 1:1 and 100:1 ratios), and a Coulter Counter (at 1:1 and 100:1 ratios). We observed that for yeast cell counts in the mixture (1:1 and 100:1 ratios), flow cytometry, the Coulter Counter, and both Spread-plate options (manual and automatic CFU counting) yielded statistically similar results, while the Drop-plate and microscopy-based methods gave statistically different results. For bacterial cell quantification, the microscopy-based method, Drop-plate, and both Spread-plate plating options and flow cytometry (1:1 ratio) produced no significantly different results (p > .05). In contrast, the Coulter Counter (1:1 ratio) and flow cytometry (100:1 ratio) presented results statistically different (p < .05). Additionally, quantifying bacterial cells in a mixed suspension at a 100:1 ratio wasn't possible due to an overlap between yeast cell debris and bacterial cells. We conclude that each method has limitations, advantages, and disadvantages.

ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY

This study compares methods for simultaneously quantifying yeast and bacterial cells in a mixed sample, highlighting that in different cell proportions, some methods cannot quantify both cell types and present distinct advantages and limitations regarding time, cost, and precision.

Cell Enumeration of Leptospira by Flow Cytometry

Rapid and reliable enumeration of Leptospira spp., the causative agent of leptospirosis, represents a technical challenge because leptospires are thin, highly motile, and slow-growing bacteria. The current gold standard for cell enumeration is the use of a Petroff-Hausser counting chamber and a dark-field microscope, but this method remains time-consuming and lacks reproducibility. New alternative techniques are then of great interest. Here we describe the protocol for counting leptospires by flow cytometry. This method is rapid, reproducible, sensitive, and hence suitable to become a new standard to enumerate Leptospira spp.

Optimization of staining with SYTO 9/propidium iodide: interplay, kinetics and impact on Brevibacillus brevis

Fluorophores SYTO 9 and propidium iodide (PI) are extensively applied in medicine, food industry and environmental monitoring to assess the viability of bacteria. However, the actual performance of these dyes remains largely unknown. In addition, their effects on the physiology of cells have not been elucidated. Here we characterized the effects of these two dyes on Brevibacillus brevis under optimized staining. We found that SYTO 9 entered cells continuously while PI tended to adhere to the cell wall before entering the cell. In addition, results showed that a high amount of the dyes altered the physicochemical properties of membranes, improving their breakthrough. These results provide new perspectives and ideas for improving the characterization of bacterial viability using flow cytometry.

Survival Tests for Leptospira spp

Measuring viability is an important and necessary assessment in studying microorganisms. Several methods can be applied to Leptospira spp., each with advantages and inconveniencies. Here, we describe the traditional colony-forming unit method, together with two other methods based, respectively, on the reducing capacity of live cells (Alamar Blue^® Assay) and differential staining of live and dead cells (LIVE/DEAD BacLight^®). The Alamar Blue^® Assay uses the blue reagent resazurin, which can be reduced into the pink reagent resorufin by live cell oxidoreductases. Production of resorufin can be quantified by absorbance or fluorescence reading. The LIVE/DEAD BacLight^® assay uses a mixture of two nucleic acid dyes (Syto9 and propidium iodide) that differentially penetrate and stain nucleic acid of cells with decreased membrane integrity. The colony-forming unit method is labor-intensive but the most sensitive and linear method. The two other methods are not laborious and well-adapted to high-throughput studies, but the range of detection and linearity are limited.

Quantitative assessment of bacterial growth phase utilizing flow cytometry

Flow cytometry is currently underutilized for bacterial phenotyping and standard microbiological techniques do not provide phenotypic information about the state of the bacterial disease. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a human pathogen of increased importance in public health due to both the ability to cause chronic diseases and the prevalence of functionally different subsets that can be difficult to treat and diagnose. In the present study, we used flow cytometry to analyze the growth phase of P. aeruginosa. A simple method for single cell quantitative detection of bacterial biofilm and planktonic cells was established with a combination of membrane permeable (SYTO 60) and impermeable (TOTO-1) dyes plus the addition of polystyrene counting beads. The specificity of the dye combination for biofilm detection was determined by comparison with impaired biofilm forming strains of P. aeruginosa LasI/RhlI-/- and ∆PfPhage. Results suggest that flow cytometric bacterial phenotyping serves as an expandable platform that may be useful for enumeration of population level variation in P. aeruginosa studies.