A PARylation-phosphorylation cascade promotes TOPBP1 loading and RPA-RAD51 exchange in homologous recombination

PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms and PARP inhibitor derived imaging probes

INTRODUCTION

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibition has become a major target in anticancer therapy. While PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for homologous recombination (HR) deficient cancers, therapeutic resistance is a challenge and PARPi are now being investigated in cancers lacking HR deficiencies. This creates a need to develop molecular and imaging biomarkers of PARPi response to improve patient selection and circumvent therapeutic resistance.

AREAS COVERED

PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were queried for studies on PARPi resistance and imaging. This review summarizes established and emerging resistance mechanisms to PARPi, and the current state of imaging and theragnostic probes for PARPi, including fluorescently labeled and radiolabeled probes.

EXPERT OPINION

While progress has been made in understanding PARPi therapeutic resistance, clinical evidence remains lacking and relatively little is known regarding PARPi response outside of HR deficiencies. Continued research will clarify the importance of known biomarkers and resistance mechanisms in patient cohorts and the broader utility of PARPi. Progress has also been made in PARPi imaging, particularly with radiolabeled probes, and both imaging and theragnostic probes have now reached clinical validation. Reducing abdominal background signal from probe clearance will broaden their applicability, and improvements to molecular synthesis and radiation delivery will increase their utility.

PARticular MARks: Histone ADP-ribosylation and the DNA damage response

Cellular and molecular responses to DNA damage are highly orchestrated and dynamic, acting to preserve the maintenance and integrity of the genome. Histone proteins bind DNA and organize the genome into chromatin. Post-translational modifications of histones have been shown to play an essential role in orchestrating the chromatin response to DNA damage by regulating the DNA damage response pathway. Among the histone modifications that contribute to this intricate network, histone ADP-ribosylation (ADPr) is emerging as a pivotal component of chromatin-based DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. In this review, we survey how histone ADPr is regulated to promote the DDR and how it impacts chromatin and other histone marks. Recent advancements have revealed histone ADPr effects on chromatin structure and the regulation of DNA repair factor recruitment to DNA lesions. Additionally, we highlight advancements in technology that have enabled the identification and functional validation of histone ADPr in cells and in response to DNA damage. Given the involvement of DNA damage and epigenetic regulation in human diseases including cancer, these findings have clinical implications for histone ADPr, which are also discussed. Overall, this review covers the involvement of histone ADPr in the DDR and highlights potential future investigations aimed at identifying mechanisms governed by histone ADPr that participate in the DDR, human diseases, and their treatments.

PARP inhibition leads to synthetic lethality with key splicing-factor mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes

BACKGROUND

Splicing factors are frequently mutated in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia. Recent studies have revealed convergent molecular defects caused by splicing factor mutations, among which R-loop dysregulation and resultant genome instability are suggested as contributing factors to disease progression. On the other hand, understanding how mutant cells survive upon aberrant R-loop formation and genome instability is essential for developing novel therapeutics.

METHODS

The immunoprecipitation was performed to identify R-loops in association with PARP1/poly-ADP-ribosylation. The western blot, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry assays were used to test the cell viability, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and ATM activation in mutant cells following the treatment of the PARP inhibitor. The Srsf2(P95H) knock-in murine hematopoietic cells and MLL-AF9 transformed leukaemia model were generated to investigate the potential of the PARP inhibitor as a therapy for haematological malignancies.

RESULTS

The disease-causing mutations in SRSF2 activate PARP and elevate the overall poly-ADP-ribosylation levels of proteins in response to R-loop dysregulation. In accordance, mutant cells are more vulnerable to the PARP inhibitors in comparison to the wild-type counterpart. Notably, the synthetic lethality was further validated in the Srsf2(P95H) knock-in murine hematopoietic cell and MLL-AF9 leukaemia model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that mutant cells antagonise the genome threat caused by R-loop disruption by PARP activation, thus making PARP targeting a promising therapeutic strategy for myeloid cancers with mutations in SRSF2.

CK2-HTATSF1-TOPBP1 signaling axis modulates tumor chemotherapy response

Homologous recombination (HR) plays a key role in maintaining genomic stability, and the efficiency of the HR system is closely associated with tumor response to chemotherapy. Our previous work reported that CK2 kinase phosphorylates HIV Tat-specific factor 1 (HTATSF1) Ser748 to facilitate HTATSF1 interaction with TOPBP1, which in turn, promotes RAD51 recruitment and HR repair. However, the clinical implication of the CK2-HTATSF1-TOPBP1 pathway in tumorigenesis and chemotherapeutic response remains to be elucidated. Here, we report that the CK2-HTATSF1-TOPBP1 axis is generally hyperactivated in multiple malignancies and renders breast tumors less responsive to chemotherapy. In contrast, deletion mutations of each gene in this axis, which also occur in breast and lung tumor samples, predict higher HR deficiency scores, and tumor cells bearing a loss-of-function mutation of HTATSF1 are vulnerable to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or platinum drugs. Taken together, our study suggests that the integrity of the CK2-HTATSF1-TOPBP1 axis is closely linked to tumorigenesis and serves as an indicator of tumor HR status and modulates chemotherapy response.

CircCDYL2 bolsters radiotherapy resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by promoting RAD51 translation initiation for enhanced homologous recombination repair

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy stands to be one of the primary approaches in the clinical treatment of malignant tumors. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, a malignancy predominantly treated with radiation therapy, provides an invaluable model for investigating the mechanisms underlying radiation therapy resistance in cancer. While some reports have suggested the involvement of circRNAs in modulating resistance to radiation therapy, the underpinning mechanisms remain unclear.

METHODS

RT-qPCR and in situ hybridization were used to detect the expression level of circCDYL2 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissue samples. The effect of circCDYL2 on radiotherapy resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma was demonstrated by in vitro and in vivo functional experiments. The HR-GFP reporter assay determined that circCDYL2 affected homologous recombination repair. RNA pull down, RIP, western blotting, IF, and polysome profiling assays were used to verify that circCDYL2 promoted the translation of RAD51 by binding to EIF3D protein.

RESULTS

We have identified circCDYL2 as highly expressed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissues, and it was closely associated with poor prognosis. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrate that circCDYL2 plays a pivotal role in promoting radiotherapy resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Our investigation unveils a specific mechanism by which circCDYL2, acting as a scaffold molecule, recruits eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit D protein (EIF3D) to the 5'-UTR of RAD51 mRNA, a crucial component of the DNA damage repair pathway to facilitate the initiation of RAD51 translation and enhance homologous recombination repair capability, and ultimately leads to radiotherapy resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings establish a novel role of the circCDYL2/EIF3D/RAD51 axis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy resistance. Our work not only sheds light on the underlying molecular mechanism but also highlights the potential of circCDYL2 as a therapeutic sensitization target and a promising prognostic molecular marker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

A di-acetyl-decorated chromatin signature couples liquid condensation to suppress DNA end synapsis

Appropriate DNA end synapsis, regulated by core components of the synaptic complex including KU70-KU80, LIG4, XRCC4, and XLF, is central to non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair of chromatinized DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, it remains enigmatic whether chromatin modifications can influence the formation of NHEJ synaptic complex at DNA ends, and if so, how this is achieved. Here, we report that the mitotic deacetylase complex (MiDAC) serves as a key regulator of DNA end synapsis during NHEJ repair in mammalian cells. Mechanistically, MiDAC removes combinatorial acetyl marks on histone H2A (H2AK5acK9ac) around DSB-proximal chromatin, suppressing hyperaccumulation of bromodomain-containing protein BRD4 that would otherwise undergo liquid-liquid phase separation with KU80 and prevent the proper installation of LIG4-XRCC4-XLF onto DSB ends. This study provides mechanistic insight into the control of NHEJ synaptic complex assembly by a specific chromatin signature and highlights the critical role of H2A hypoacetylation in restraining unscheduled compartmentalization of DNA repair machinery.

PSIP1/LEDGF reduces R-loops at transcription sites to maintain genome integrity

R-loops that accumulate at transcription sites pose a persistent threat to genome integrity. PSIP1 is a chromatin protein associated with transcriptional elongation complex, possesses histone chaperone activity, and is implicated in recruiting RNA processing and DNA repair factors to transcription sites. Here, we show that PSIP1 interacts with R-loops and other proteins involved in R-loop homeostasis, including PARP1. Genome-wide mapping of PSIP1, R-loops and γ-H2AX in PSIP1-depleted human and mouse cell lines revealed an accumulation of R-loops and DNA damage at gene promoters in the absence of PSIP1. R-loop accumulation causes local transcriptional arrest and transcription-replication conflict, leading to DNA damage. PSIP1 depletion increases 53BP1 foci and reduces RAD51 foci, suggesting altered DNA repair choice. Furthermore, PSIP1 depletion increases the sensitivity of cancer cells to PARP1 inhibitors and DNA-damaging agents that induce R-loop-induced DNA damage. These findings provide insights into the mechanism through which PSIP1 maintains genome integrity at the site of transcription.

Replication Protein A, the Main Eukaryotic Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein, a Focal Point in Cellular DNA Metabolism

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric protein complex and the main single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein in eukaryotes. RPA has key functions in most of the DNA-associated metabolic pathways and DNA damage signalling. Its high affinity for ssDNA helps to stabilise ssDNA structures and protect the DNA sequence from nuclease attacks. RPA consists of multiple DNA-binding domains which are oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB)-folds that are responsible for DNA binding and interactions with proteins. These RPA-ssDNA and RPA-protein interactions are crucial for DNA replication, DNA repair, DNA damage signalling, and the conservation of the genetic information of cells. Proteins such as ATR use RPA to locate to regions of DNA damage for DNA damage signalling. The recruitment of nucleases and DNA exchange factors to sites of double-strand breaks are also an important RPA function to ensure effective DNA recombination to correct these DNA lesions. Due to its high affinity to ssDNA, RPA's removal from ssDNA is of central importance to allow these metabolic pathways to proceed, and processes to exchange RPA against downstream factors are established in all eukaryotes. These faceted and multi-layered functions of RPA as well as its role in a variety of human diseases will be discussed.

CIP2A coordinates phosphosignaling, mitosis, and the DNA damage response

Human cancers share requirements for phosphorylation-dependent signaling, mitotic hyperactivity, and survival after DNA damage. The oncoprotein CIP2A (cancerous inhibitor of PP2A) can coordinate all these cancer cell characteristics. In addition to controlling cancer cell phosphoproteomes via inhibition of protein phosphatase PP2A, CIP2A directly interacts with the DNA damage protein TopBP1 (topoisomerase II-binding protein 1). Consequently, CIP2A allows DNA-damaged cells to enter mitosis and is essential for mitotic cells that are defective in homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA repair (e.g., BRCA mutants). The CIP2A-TopBP1 complex is also important for clustering fragmented chromosomes at mitosis. Clinically, CIP2A is a disease driver for basal-like triple-negative breast cancer (BL-TNBC) and a promising cancer therapy target across many cancer types.

ADAR1 links R-loop homeostasis to ATR activation in replication stress response

Unscheduled R-loops are a major source of replication stress and DNA damage. R-loop-induced replication defects are sensed and suppressed by ATR kinase, whereas it is not known whether R-loop itself is actively involved in ATR activation and, if so, how this is achieved. Here, we report that the nuclear form of RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 promotes ATR activation and resolves genome-wide R-loops, a process that requires its double-stranded RNA-binding domains. Mechanistically, ADAR1 interacts with TOPBP1 and facilitates its loading on perturbed replication forks by enhancing the association of TOPBP1 with RAD9 of the 9-1-1 complex. When replication is inhibited, DNA-RNA hybrid competes with TOPBP1 for ADAR1 binding to promote the translocation of ADAR1 from damaged fork to accumulate at R-loop region. There, ADAR1 recruits RNA helicases DHX9 and DDX21 to unwind R-loops, simultaneously allowing TOPBP1 to stimulate ATR more efficiently. Collectively, we propose that the tempo-spatially regulated assembly of ADAR1-nucleated protein complexes link R-loop clearance and ATR activation, while R-loops crosstalk with blocked replication forks by transposing ADAR1 to finetune ATR activity and safeguard the genome.

Pre-rRNA Facilitates TopBP1-Mediated DNA Double-Strand Break Response

In response to genotoxic stress-induced DNA damage, TopBP1 mediates ATR activation for signaling transduction and DNA damage repair. However, the detailed molecular mechanism remains elusive. Here, using unbiased protein affinity purification and RNA sequencing, it is found that TopBP1 is associated with pre-ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA). Pre-rRNA co-localized with TopBP1 at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Similar to pre-rRNA, ribosomal proteins also colocalize with TopBP1 at DSBs. The recruitment of TopBP1 to DSBs is suppressed when cells are transiently treated with RNA polymerase I inhibitor (Pol I-i) to suppress pre-rRNA biogenesis but not protein translation. Moreover, the BRCT4-5 of TopBP1 recognizes pre-rRNA and forms liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) with pre-rRNA, which may be the molecular basis of DSB-induced foci of TopBP1. Finally, Pol I-i treatment impairs TopBP1-associated cell cycle checkpoint activation and homologous recombination repair. Collectively, this study reveals that pre-rRNA plays a key role in the TopBP1-dependent DNA damage response.

Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals molecular pathway network alterations in human early-stage primary hepatic carcinomas: potential for 3P medical approach

Objective

Hepatic carcinoma is one of the most common types of malignant tumors in the digestive system, and its biological characteristics determine its high rate of metastasis and recurrence after radical resection, leading to a poor prognosis for patients. Increasing evidence demonstrates that phosphoproteins and phosphorylation-mediated molecular pathways influence the occurrence and development of hepatic carcinoma. It is urgent need to develop early-stage biomarkers for improving diagnosis, therapy, medical service, and prognostic assessment. We hypothesize that phosphoproteome and phosphorylation-mediated signaling pathway networks significantly differ in human early-stage primary hepatic carcinomas relative to control liver tissues, which will identify the key differentially phosphorylated proteins and phosphorylation-mediated signaling pathway network alterations in human early-stage primary hepatic carcinoma to innovate predictive diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and personalized medical services and progress beyond the state of the art in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM).

Methods

Tandem mass tag (TMT)-based quantitative proteomics coupled with TiO2 enrichment of phosphopeptides was used to identify phosphorylation profiling, and bioinformatics was used to analyze the pathways and biological functions of phosphorylation profiling between early-stage hepatic carcinoma tissues and tumor-adjacent normal control tissues. Furthermore, the integrative analysis with transcriptomic data from TCGA database obtained differently expressed genes (DEGs) corresponding to differentially phosphorylated proteins (DPPs) and overall survival (OS)-related DPPs.

Results

A total of 1326 phosphopeptides derived from 858 DPPs in human early-stage primary hepatic carcinoma were identified. KEGG pathway network analysis of 858 DPPs revealed 33 statistically significant signaling pathways, including spliceosome, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, B-cell receptor signaling pathway, HIF-1 signaling pathway, and fatty acid degradation. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of 858 DPPs revealed that protein phosphorylation was involved in 57 biological processes, 40 cellular components, and 37 molecular functions. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network constructed multiple high-combined scores and co-expressed DPPs. Integrative analysis of transcriptomic data and DPP data identified 105 overlapped molecules (DPPs; DEGs) between hepatic carcinoma tissues and control tissues and 125 OS-related DPPs. Overlapping Venn plots showed 14 common molecules among datasets of DPPs, DEGs, and OS-related DDPs, including FTCD, NDRG2, CCT2, PECR, SLC23A2, PNPLA7, ANLN, HNRNPM, HJURP, MCM2, STMN1, TCOF1, TOP2A, and SSRP1. The drug sensitivities of OS-related DPPs were identified, including LMOD1, CAV2, UBE2E2, RAPH1, ANXA5, HDLBP, CUEDC1, APBB1IP, VCL, SRSF10, SLC23A2, EPB41L2, ESR1, PLEKHA4, SAFB2, SMARCAD1, VCAN, PSD4, RDH16, NOP56, MEF2C, BAIAP2L2, NAGS, SRSF2, FHOD3, and STMN1.

Conclusions

Identification and annotation of phosphoproteomes and phosphorylation-mediated signaling pathways in human early-stage primary hepatic carcinoma tissues provided new directions for tumor prevention and treatment, which (i) helps to enrich phosphorylation functional research and develop new biomarkers; (ii) enriches phosphorylation-mediated signaling pathways to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms of early-stage primary hepatic carcinoma; and (iii) develops anti-tumor drugs that facilitate targeted phosphorylated sites. We recommend quantitative phosphoproteomics in early-stage primary hepatic carcinoma, which offers great promise for in-depth insight into the molecular mechanism of early-stage primary hepatic carcinoma, the discovery of effective therapeutic targets/drugs, and the construction of reliable phosphorylation-related biomarkers for patient stratification, predictive diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and personalized medical services in the framework of PPPM.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-023-00335-3.

Poly(ADP) ribose polymerase promotes DNA polymerase theta-mediated end joining by activation of end resection

The DNA polymerase theta (Polθ)-mediated end joining (TMEJ) pathway for repair of chromosomal double strand breaks (DSBs) is essential in cells deficient in other DSB repair pathways, including hereditary breast cancers defective in homologous recombination. Strand-break activated poly(ADP) ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1) has been implicated in TMEJ, but the modest specificity of existing TMEJ assays means the extent of effect and the mechanism behind it remain unclear. We describe here a series of TMEJ assays with improved specificity and show ablation of PARP activity reduces TMEJ activity 2-4-fold. The reduction in TMEJ is attributable to a reduction in the 5' to 3' resection of DSB ends that is essential for engagement of this pathway and is compensated by increased repair by the nonhomologous-end joining pathway. This limited role for PARP activity in TMEJ helps better rationalize the combined employment of inhibitors of PARP and Polθ in cancer therapy.

TOPBPing up DSBs with PARylation

Zhao et al. (2022) demonstrate that HIV Tat-specific factor 1, an RPA PARylation reader, recruits Topoisomerase IIβ-binding protein 1 to double-strand break sites specifically in the S phase of the cell cycle to promote homologous recombination.