Exploring cognitive motor interference in multiple sclerosis by the visual Stroop test

Effect of task difficulty on dual-task cost during dual-task walking in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Cognitive-motor dual-task walking results a decrease in walking performance of patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and it is known as dual-task cost (DTC). However, there is a lack of evidence about the effects of dual-tasks with hierarchical difficulty on DTC in PwMS.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study aimed to investigate the effect of task difficulty on DTC during cognitive-motor dual-task walking in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

METHODS

32 PwMS and 32 healthy controls were included. The 6-meter walking test (6-Meter WT) with comfortable speed was used as single-task walking condition. For dual-task conditions, walking tasks and cognitive tasks at two difficulty levels (simple and difficult) were combined and DTC for four cognitive-motor dual-task walking conditions as simple motor-simple cognitive (SM-SC), simple motor-difficult cognitive (SM-DC), difficult motor-simple cognitive (DM-SC) and difficult motor-difficult cognitive (DM-DC) were calculated. The 6-Meter WT was used also for simple dual-task walking task. The 6-Meter WT was applied by walking in a narrow base condition for creating a difficult dual-task walking task. For cognitive task difficulty, participants were asked to count backwards by 3 as simple cognitive task and by 7 as difficult cognitive task.

RESULTS

DTC was higher in PwMS than control subjects. DTC in all conditions were different (SM-SC

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that task difficulty affects the magnitude of DTC during cognitive-motor dual-task walking in PwMS. Moreover, difficult walking tasks combined with simple cognitive tasks result greater DCT on walking than simple walking tasks combined with difficult cognitive tasks.

Collapse

Key Words

• Dual-task
• Motor-cognitive tasks
• Multiple sclerosis
• Task difficulty
• Walking

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Çağrı Gülşen Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Fatih Söke Gulhane Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
Fatma Aydin Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and Research Hospital, Department of Neurology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
Elvan Özcan Gülşen Yunus Emre Vocational School, Department of Health Care Services, Program in Geriatric Care, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey
Öznur Yilmaz Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Bilge Koçer Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and Research Hospital, Department of Neurology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
Etem Çürük Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey
Şeref Demirkaya Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
Canan Yücesan Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

Collapse

Impact of physical activity, physical fitness and exercises on cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis: A review of evidence and underlying mechanisms

Cognitive impairment in persons with MS (pwMS) occurs commonly, early and independently of other clinical features of the disease. MS-related cognitive impairment is mainly characterized by weakening of information processing speed, working memory and episodic memory. Much evidence, based on both neuropsychological and neuroimaging outcomes, highlights successful cognitive rehabilitation interventions. In this context, promotion of physical activity and exercise training could be a dual, motor and cognitive, rehabilitation method. The aim of this article is, firstly, to review existing evidence regarding the effects of exercise on cognition among pwMS, and secondly, to explore the possible mechanisms of action of the cognitive-motor coupling.

Efficacy of ultraviolet B radiation versus vitamin D3 on postural control and cognitive functions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

The relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the most common type of MS with prevalence rate 20-60 patients/100.000 individuals in Egypt. Poor postural control and cognitive dysfunctions are well-established complications of RRMS without potent remedy yet. The latest evidence highlighted the potential and independent immune-modulating effects of vitamin D3 and ultraviolet radiation in the management of RRMS.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of broadband ultraviolet B radiation (UVBR) versus moderate loading dose of vitamin D3 supplementation in improving postural control and cognitive functions.

DESIGN

Pretest-posttest randomized controlled study.

SETTING

Multiple sclerosis outpatient unit of Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-seven patients with RRMS were recruited from both genders, yet only 40 completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized into two groups: UVBR group involved 24 patients, received sessions for 4 weeks and vitamin D3 group involved 23 patients, took vitamin D3 supplementation (50 000 IU/week) for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall balance system index (OSI) and symbol digit modalities test (SDMT).

RESULTS

Highly significant decrease (P < 0.001) of the OSI in both groups post-treatment, indicating improved postural control. Moreover, highly significant improvement in the SDMT scores was noted, indicating information processing speed enhancement. Nonetheless, no statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05) differences were evident between the two groups post-treatment in all tested measures.

CONCLUSION

Both therapeutic programs were statistically equal in improving postural control and cognitive functions. However, clinically, UVBR therapy was more convenient owing to its shorter treatment time and higher percentage of change for all tested measures.

How Reliable and Valid are Dual-Task Cost Metrics? A Meta-analysis of Locomotor-Cognitive Dual-Task Paradigms

OBJECTIVE

To assess the retest reliability, predictive validity, and concurrent validity of locomotor and cognitive dual-task cost (DTC) metrics derived from locomotor-cognitive dual-task paradigms.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus) was conducted on May 29th, 2021, without time restriction.

STUDY SELECTION

For 1559 search results, titles and abstracts were screened by a single reviewer and full text of potentially eligible papers was considered by 2 independent reviewers. 25 studies that evaluated retest reliability, predictive validity, and concurrent validity of locomotor-cognitive DTC in healthy and clinical groups met inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study quality was assessed using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instrument checklist. Data relating to the retest reliability, predictive validity, and concurrent validity of DTC were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Meta-analysis showed that locomotor DTC metrics (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.53.0.70]) had better retest reliability than cognitive DTC metrics (ICC=0.27, 95% CI [0.17.0.36]). Larger retest reliability estimates were found for temporal gait outcomes (ICC=0.67-0.72) compared with spatial (ICC=0.34-0.53). Motor DTC metrics showed weak predictive validity for the incidence of future falls (r=0.14, 95% CI [-0.03.0.31]). Motor DTC metrics had weak concurrent validity with other clinical and performance assessments (r=0.11, 95% CI [0.07.0.16]), as did cognitive DTC metrics (r=0.19, 95% CI [0.08.0.30]).

CONCLUSIONS

Gait-related temporal DTC metrics achieve adequate retest reliability, while predictive and concurrent validity of DTC needs to be improved before being used widely in clinical practice and other applied settings. Future research should ensure the reliability and validity of DTC outcomes before being used to assess dual-task interference.

Sensitivity of conventional cognitive tests in multiple sclerosis: Application of item response theory

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment (CI) is common in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and its prevalence rate ranges between 22% and 70%. Because CI significantly impacts vocational status, caregiver burden, and quality of life, an accurate neuropsychological assessment is required. Three widely used and validated batteries for MS-associated CI are the Brief Repeatable Neuropsychological Battery (BRN-B), the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function (MACFIMS), and the Brief International Cognitive Assessment (BICAMS). Although similar, these batteries differ in time-consuming and in specific tests employed. This study aims to assess the sensitivity of cognitive tests included in these batteries through an Item Response Theory approach.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with MS and 91 demographically matched controls (HC) were consecutively assessed using the three neuropsychological batteries (i.e., BRN-B, MACFIMS, and BICAMS). Continuous Response Model (CRM) was used to identify the cognitive test(s) that best discriminate patients with MS from HC. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the accuracy of the CRM results.

RESULTS

Cognitive tests loaded on two different latent variables: the 'higher-order executive functioning,' consisting of tests assessing concept formation, problem-solving, and inhibitory control, and the 'memory and information processing speed,' comprising tests assessing long-term, working memory, and information processing speed. The Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System-Sorting Test and the Stroop Test were the most sensitive tests in differentiating cognitive functioning between MS and HC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the importance of including a more extensive executive assessment in MS clinical practice since higher-order executive functions (e.g., abstraction and inhibitory control) significantly impact patients' quality of life and functional autonomy. Clinical implications of careful dissection of executive functioning in MS neuropsychological assessment are discussed.

Cognitive-motor interference in people with mild to moderate multiple sclerosis, in comparison with healthy controls

BACKGROUND

Reduced motor and cognitive dual-task capacity is found to be more common among people with multiple sclerosis (MS), than among healthy populations. However, studies in larger samples of MS conducted using a more stringent methodology, which includes comparisons to healthy controls, are needed. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to explore the effects on motor and cognitive dual-tasking in people with mild to moderate overall MS-disability, in comparison to healthy controls. A second aim was to explore the differences in dual-task performance on a cognitive task between two motor tasks in people with mild to moderate MS and healthy controls.

METHODS

This case-control study evaluated dual-task performance of the motor tasks standing with eyes closed (hereafter standing) and walking and a cognitive task assessing selective executive functions (auditory-Stroop test). Fifty-five people with MS (mild MS, n = 28; moderate MS, n = 27), and 30 healthy controls participated. Standing and walking were assessed using wireless inertial measurement unit sensors (APDM). Standing (three 30 s trials) was measured using sway area and root mean square sway, while walking (2 min) was measured using speed, stride length, and step time. Auditory-Stroop was measured using accuracy and response time. During dual-task assessments, each subject was instructed to pay equal attention to both tasks. Statistical significance was considered if p < .05.

RESULTS

Instanding no significant within-group differences in the standing measures were found between single-task and dual-task performance. However, dual-task performance differed significantly between all groups (moderate MS > mild MS > healthy controls), except between mild and moderate MS in sway area. Inwalking, all groups slowed down speed and shortened stride length during dual-task condition compared to single-task condition. Moderate MS performed significantly poorer than mild MS and healthy controls in dual-task walking, but mild MS did not differ from healthy controls. In thecognitivetask only mild MS increased significantly in auditory-Stroop response time during walking. In healthy controls, the performance of auditory-Stroop was not affected by dual-tasking. Moderate MS had significantly longer response time in dual-task auditory-Stroop compared to the other groups, but no differences were observed between mild MS and healthy controls. Only mild MS had significantly longer response time during walking than during standing.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that cognitive-motor interference in people with MS is present also in the early phases of the disease. This was shown during dual-tasking with slower walking and a longer response time in the cognitive task compared to healthy controls. Moderate MS performed poorer in almost every aspect of the motor and cognitive assessments in dual-task condition, compared to mild MS and healthy controls. Furthermore, during standing, people with MS performed poorer in standing measures compared to healthy controls. Additionally, healthy controls showed no cognitive interference during motor tasks. The results suggest that standardized regular assessment of dual-tasking in MS care might increase the individual's knowledge of dual-task capacity and contribute to understanding of possible related consequences. However, feasible assessment equipment and specific motor-cognitive dual-task training interventions for people with MS need to be developed.

Video game therapy on mobility and dual tasking in multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the major causes of disability in young adults and affects mobility, compromising daily living activities and participation in social life. Cognitive domain is also frequently impaired in people with MS (PwMS), particularly the capacity to perform dual-task activities. Impaired cognitive processing abilities need to be treated, and motor and cognitive aspects need to be considered together. Recently, video game therapy (VGT) has been used in rehabilitation to improve motor outcomes and cognitive processing speed. The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of commercially available VGT on mobility and dual tasking in PwMS compared with standardised balance platform training (BPT).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This will be a parallel-assignment, double-blinded, randomised control trial. Forty-eight (24 per arm) PwMS with Expanded Disability Status Scale 4-5.5 will be randomly assigned to receive 1 hour training session over 4 weeks (three sessions/week) of either: (1) VGT on commercial video game console to train balance and mobility-related activities or (2) BPT to perform balance, postural stability and weight-shifting exercises with and without visual feedback. The same assessor will evaluate outcome measures at points: before and after the 12 training sessions and at 3 months of follow-up. The primary outcome will be functional mobility, assessed by the Timed Up and Go test. We will also evaluate gait, risk of fall, fatigue and health-related quality of life as well as cognitive and psychological aspects (depression, anxiety and attentional performance) and stability through posturographic evaluation. Dual-tasking assessment will be performed combining posturographic and neuropsychological tests. Data analysis will be performed to compare the efficacy of the two treatments.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval have been granted from the local Ethics Committee. Study results will be communicated through high-quality journals and national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03353974.

Psychometric Properties of Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Studies With the Aim of Developing a Test Protocol for Persons With Vestibular Disorders: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Patients suffering from vestibular disorders (VD) often present with impairments in cognitive domains such as visuospatial ability, memory, executive function, attention, and processing speed. These symptoms can be attributed to extensive vestibular projections throughout the cerebral cortex and subcortex on the one hand, and to increased cognitive-motor interference (CMI) on the other hand. CMI can be assessed by performing cognitive-motor dual-tasks (DTs). The existing literature on this topic is scarce and varies greatly when it comes to test protocol, type and degree of vestibular impairment, and outcome. To develop a reliable and sensitive test protocol for VD patients, an overview of the existing reliability and validity studies on DT paradigms will be given in a variety of populations, such as dementia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, stroke, and elderly.

DESIGN

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An extensive literature search on psychometric properties of cognitive-motor DTs was run on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Databases. The studies were assessed for eligibility by two independent researchers, and their methodological quality was subsequently evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-three studies were included in the current review. Based on the reliability and validity calculations, including a static as well as dynamic motor task seems valuable in a DT protocol for VD patients. To evoke CMI maximally in this population, both motor tasks should be performed while challenging the vestibular cognitive domains. Out of the large amount of cognitive tasks employed in DT studies, a clear selection for each of these domains, except for visuospatial abilities, could be made based on this review. The use of the suggested DTs will give a more accurate and daily life representation of cognitive and motor deficiencies and their interaction in the VD population.

Dual-Task Cost and Related Clinical Features in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

This study aimed to investigate the dual-task cost of both motor and cognitive performances in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and in healthy controls and to determine their relationships with clinical features in PwMS. The participants performed motor tasks (postural stability, walking, and manual dexterity) and cognitive tasks (mental tracking and verbal fluency) under single- and dual-task conditions. The results showed that postural stability under dual-task conditions did not change, whereas walking and manual dexterity deteriorated, regardless of the concurrent cognitive task, in PwMS (median Expanded Disability Status Scale score: 1) and the healthy controls. Verbal fluency decreased during postural stability, whereas it increased during walking, and it was maintained during manual dexterity in both groups. Mental tracking did not change during walking; it declined during manual dexterity in both groups. Mental tracking during postural stability deteriorated in PwMS, while it did not change in the healthy controls. In general, dual-task costs were associated with baseline performances of tasks rather than clinical features. Therefore, baseline performances of both tasks should be increased for improving dual-task performance in PwMS.

Test-Retest Reliability of Cognitive-Motor Interference Assessments in Walking With Various Task Complexities in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

Background. Simultaneous execution of motor and cognitive tasks can result in worsened performance on one or both tasks, indicating cognitive-motor interference (CMI). A growing amount of research on CMI in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is observed. However, psychometric properties of dual-task outcomes have been scarcely reported. Objective. To investigate the between-day test-retest reliability of the motor and cognitive dual-task costs (DTCs) during multiple CMI test conditions with various task complexities in pwMS and matched healthy controls (HCs). Methods. A total of 34 pwMS (Expanded Disability Status Scale score 3.0 ± 0.8) and 31 HCs were tested and retested on 3 single cognitive, 4 single motor, and 12 cognitive-motor dual tasks. Cognitive tasks included serial subtraction by 7, titrated digit span backward, and auditory vigilance. Motor tasks were walking at self-selected speed, over obstacles, crisscross, and while carrying a water-filled cup. Outcome measures were cognitive and motor DTC, calculated as percentage change of dual-task performance compared with single-task performance. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated as appropriate. Results. For DTCmotor of gait speed, ICCs ranged from 0.45 to 0.81 and Spearman correlations from 0.74 to 0.82. For DTCcognitive, ICCs ranged from −0.18 to 0.49 and Spearman correlations from −0.28 to 0.26. Reliability depended on the type of motor and cognitive task. Conclusion. Reliability of the DTCmotor was, overall, good, whereas that of the DTCcognitive was poor. The “walking” and “cup” dual-task conditions were the most reliable regardless of the integrated cognitive task.