Is antibody titer useful to verify the immunization after VZV Vaccine in MS patients treated with Fingolimod? A case series

Serology results after COVID vaccine in multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod

INTRODUCTION

While it is recommended that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) be vaccinated against COVID-19, it is unknown what the vaccine response is in MS patients treated with fingolimod, an agent which modulates the humoral response. We aimed to characterize the immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine in MS patients treated with fingolimod and to explore which factors influenced response.

METHOD

We collected the following data from 59 MS patients treated with fingolimod and vaccinated against COVID-19: age, sex, duration of treatment, number of vaccine doses, date of last vaccination, type of vaccine, lymphocyte count, history of COVID-19, and serology to measure the vaccine response. We used Student's t-test and Chi² test to see whether there was a relationship between these variables and seropositivity. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors influencing the serology result. A multivariate linear regression model was used to identify factors influencing the antibody titer.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight participants (47%) developed a positive serology. Age (P<0.001) and the duration of treatment (P=0.002) were significantly related to seropositivity. Gender (P=0.73), number of vaccinations (P=0.78), lymphocyte count (P=0.46), and the time between the last vaccine dose and blood sampling (P=0.84) were not significant variables. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression (n=59) showed that age (P=0.003, RR = 2.28, 95%CI = 1.28, 4.07) and duration of treatment (P=0.04, RR=1.91, 95%CI=1.04, 3.50) were significantly and independently correlated with COVID serology. Multivariate linear regression analysis of the antibody titer (n=59) found the duration of treatment to be significant (P = 0.015), but not age (P = 0.53). After removing three outliers, age (P = 0.005, RR=6.82, 95%CI=1.66, 27.98) and duration of treatment (P = 0.008, RR=5.12, 95%CI=1.24, 21.03) were significantly correlated with the antibody titer.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 seropositivity was present in 47% of our sample of 59 MS patients on fingolimod. A strong relationship was found between antibody development, age, and duration of treatment, as well as between antibody titer and age and duration of treatment.

HBV and VZV seroprotection loss in MS patients under DMT

BACKGROUND

Strategies recommended to decrease the risk of infection associated with the use of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying treatments include screening and immunization against common viral infections such as varicella-zoster (VZV) and hepatitis B (HBV). However, the data concerning the durability of those vaccine responses and the need for re-test is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate HBV and VZV seroprotection loss in MS patients under DMT.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study including patients with basal seroprotective titers against HBV/VZV viruses and a subsequent serology performed at least 3 months apart. We evaluated predictors of seroprotection loss through a binary regression.

RESULTS

HBV seroprotection loss occurred in one-fifth of patients in a median interval of 21.3 months. Anti-CD20 treatment (OR 8.559 95%CI 3.467- 21.130, p < 000.1), age at last serology higher or equal to 55 years (OR 7.506, 95% CI 2.473-22.786, p < 0.001) and basal HBsAb titer (OR 0.992, 95%CI 0.987 -0.996, p=0.001) increase the risk of seroprotection loss. VZV seroprotection loss occurred rarely in a median interval of 21.3 months. We could not identify any factor associated with an increased risk of VZV seroprotection loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-CD20 drugs are associated with a loss of seroprotection against HBV in a short-interval follow-up.

Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review/meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with MS (pwMS) varies by disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). We perform a meta-analysis and systematic review of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwMS.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase from January 1, 2019-December 31, 2021, excluding prior SARS-CoV-2 infections. The meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were applied. The data were pooled using a fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Eight-hundred sixty-four healthy controls and 2203 pwMS from 31 studies were included. Antibodies were detected in 93% healthy controls (HCs), and 77% pwMS, with >93% responses in all DMTs (interferon-beta, glatiramer acetate, cladribine, natalizumab, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab, and teriflunomide) except for 72% sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators (S1PM) and 44% anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). T-cell responses were detected in most anti-CD20 and decreased in S1PM. Higher antibody response was observed in mRNA vaccines (99.7% HCs) versus non-mRNA vaccines (HCs: 72% inactivated virus; pwMS: 86% vector, 59% inactivated virus). A multivariate logistic regression model to predict vaccine response demonstrated that mRNA versus non-mRNA vaccines had a 3.4 odds ratio (OR) for developing immunity in anti-CD20 (p = 0.0052) and 7.9 OR in pwMS on S1PM or CD20 mAbs (p < 0.0001). Antibody testing timing did not affect antibody detection.

CONCLUSION

Antibody responses are decreased in S1PM and anti-CD20; however, cellular responses were positive in most anti-CD20 with decreased T cell responses in S1PM. mRNA vaccines had increased seroconversion rates compared to non-RNA vaccines. Further investigation in how DMTs affect vaccine immunity are needed.

Vaccination and immunotherapies in neuroimmunological diseases

Neuroimmunological diseases and their treatment compromise the immune system, thereby increasing the risk of infections and serious illness. Consequently, vaccinations to protect against infections are an important part of the clinical management of these diseases. However, the wide variety of immunotherapies that are currently used to treat neuroimmunological disease — particularly multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders — can also impair immunological responses to vaccinations. In this Review, we discuss what is known about the effects of various immunotherapies on immunological responses to vaccines and what these effects mean for the safe and effective use of vaccines in patients with a neuroimmunological disease. The success of vaccination in patients receiving immunotherapy largely depends on the specific mode of action of the immunotherapy. To minimize the risk of infection when using immunotherapy, assessment of immune status and exclusion of underlying chronic infections before initiation of therapy are essential. Selection of the required vaccinations and leaving appropriate time intervals between vaccination and administration of immunotherapy can help to safeguard patients. We also discuss the rapidly evolving knowledge of how immunotherapies affect responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and how these effects should influence the management of patients on these therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In this Review, the authors discuss how various immunotherapies for neuroimmunological diseases interact with vaccination responses, including responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, and the implications for the safe and effective use of vaccines in patients with these diseases.

Vaccination against infection is an essential part of the management of neuroimmunological diseases.

All indicated vaccinations should be administered before initiation of immunotherapy whenever possible; appropriate intervals between vaccination and treatment vary with treatment and vaccination.

Inactivated vaccines are considered safe in neuroimmunological diseases but live vaccines are generally contraindicated during immunotherapy.

Vaccination responses during immunotherapy can be diminished or abrogated, depending on the treatment and vaccination; antibody titre testing to monitor responses can be considered where appropriate.

Vaccinations must be avoided during relapses or exacerbations of neuroimmunological diseases.

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is recommended for patients with neuroimmunological disease but some immunotherapies limit the immune response; therefore, timing should be considered carefully.

Anti-HBs titers are not decreased after treatment with oral Cladribine in patients with Multiple Sclerosis vaccinated against Hepatitis B virus

BACKGROUND

Oral cladribine is a novel treatment for Multiple Sclerosis (MS). It is a purine nucleoside antimetabolite analogue that is incorporated into the DNA, resulting in single-strand breaks in DNA and apoptosis of replicating lymphocytes. Specifically, Cladribine induces limited depletion of CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets and more marked depletion of memory B cell subsets. Therefore, natural and acquired humoral responses against pathogens may be potentially reduced. The aim of this study was to assess longitudinal variation of antiHBs titers in patients with MS treated with Cladribine.

METHODS

Patients with MS treated with 1 cycle of Cladribine (3,5 mg/kg) and previously vaccinated against Hepatitis B virus (HBV) were enrolled. Anti-HBs titers were compared before and after 12 months from Cladribine treatment. Total lymphocyte count was also analysed.

RESULTS

Among the 13 RMS patients (10 F, 3 M, mean age 33,8, SD 5,9) enrolled, all had anti-HBs titers >10 mg/dl at baseline. Anti-HBs titer dropped below the reference value at 12 months after Cladribine only in 1 case. Pre-post Cladribine mean anti-HBs values were not significantly different considering the whole cohort (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test p = 0,762). Four patients had grade 1 and 1 patient grade 2 lymphocytopenia at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Cladribine does not seem to reduce humoral immune responses in subjects previously vaccinated against HBV, even in case of lymphocytopenia. These results, if confirmed in larger populations, appear reassuring also for other vaccinations (i.e. COVID19). The low impact of Cladribine on plasma cells may explain such findings.

Recommendations by the Scientific Department of Neuroimmunology of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (DCNI/ABN) and the Brazilian Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunological Diseases (BCTRIMS) on vaccination in general and specifically against SARS-CoV-2 for patients with demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system

The Scientific Department of Neuroimmunology of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (DCNI/ABN) and Brazilian Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunological Diseases (BCTRIMS) provide recommendations in this document for vaccination of the population with demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) against infections in general and against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19. We emphasize the seriousness of the current situation in view of the spread of COVID-19 in our country. Therefore, reference guides on vaccination for clinicians, patients, and public health authorities are particularly important to prevent some infectious diseases. The DCNI/ABN and BCTRIMS recommend that patients with CNS demyelinating diseases (e.g., MS and NMOSD) be continually monitored for updates to their vaccination schedule, especially at the beginning or before a change in treatment with a disease modifying drug (DMD). It is also important to note that vaccines are safe, and physicians should encourage their use in all patients. Clearly, special care should be taken when live attenuated viruses are involved. Finally, it is important for physicians to verify which DMD the patient is receiving and when the last dose was taken, as each drug may affect the induction of immune response differently.

Secondary Immunodeficiency and Risk of Infection Following Immune Therapies in Neurology

Secondary immunodeficiencies (SIDs) are acquired conditions that may occur as sequelae of immune therapy. In recent years a number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has been approved for multiple sclerosis and related disorders such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, some of which are frequently also used in- or off-label to treat conditions such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), myasthenia gravis, myositis, and encephalitis. In this review, we focus on currently available immune therapeutics in neurology to explore their specific modes of action that might contribute to SID, with particular emphasis on their potential to induce secondary antibody deficiency. Considering evidence from clinical trials as well as long-term observational studies related to the patients' immune status and risks of severe infections, we delineate long-term anti-CD20 therapy, with the greatest data availability for rituximab, as a major risk factor for the development of SID, particularly through secondary antibody deficiency. Alemtuzumab and cladribine have relevant effects on circulating B-cell counts; however, evidence for SID mediated by antibody deficiency appears limited and urgently warrants further systematic evaluation. To date, there has been no evidence suggesting that treatment with fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, or natalizumab leads to antibody deficiency. Risk factors predisposing to development of SID include duration of therapy, increasing age, and pre-existing low immunoglobulin (Ig) levels. Prevention strategies of SID comprise awareness of risk factors, individualized treatment protocols, and vaccination concepts. Immune supplementation employing Ig replacement therapy might reduce morbidity and mortality associated with SIDs in neurological conditions. In light of the broad range of existing and emerging therapies, the potential for SID warrants urgent consideration among neurologists and other healthcare professionals.

Vaccine Considerations for Multiple Sclerosis in the COVID-19 Era

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are at risk for infections that can result in amplification of baseline symptoms and possibly trigger clinical relapses. Vaccination can prevent infection through the activation of humoral and cellular immune responses. This is particularly pertinent in the era of emerging novel vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MS disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), which affect the immune system, may impact immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines in people with MS. The objective of this article is to provide information on immune system responses to vaccinations and review previous studies of vaccine responses in people with MS to support the safety and importance of receiving currently available and emerging COVID-19 vaccines. Immunological studies have shown that coordinated interactions between T and B lymphocytes of the adaptive immune system are key to successful generation of immunological memory and production of neutralizing antibodies following recognition of vaccine antigens by innate immune cells. CD4+ T cells are essential to facilitate CD8+ T cell and B cell activation, while B cells drive and sustain T cell memory. Data suggest that some classes of DMT, including type 1 interferons and glatiramer acetate, may not significantly impair the response to vaccination. DMTs-such as sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, which sequester lymphocytes from circulation; alemtuzumab; and anti-CD20 therapies, which rely on depleting populations of immune cells-have been shown to attenuate responses to conventional vaccines. Currently, three COVID-19 vaccines have been granted emergency use authorization in the USA on the basis of promising interim findings of ongoing trials. Because analyses of these vaccines in people with MS are not available, decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccination and DMT choice should be informed by data and expert consensus, and personalized with considerations for disease burden, risk of infection, and other factors.

The underpinning biology relating to multiple sclerosis disease modifying treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 viral infection causes COVID-19 that can result in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which can cause significant mortality, leading to concern that immunosuppressive treatments for multiple sclerosis and other disorders have significant risks for both infection and ARDS.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the biology that potentially underpins immunity to the SARS-Cov-2 virus and the immunity-induced pathology related to COVID-19 and determine how this impinges on the use of current disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis.

OBSERVATIONS

Although information about the mechanisms of immunity are scant, it appears that monocyte/macrophages and then CD8 T cells are important in eliminating the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This may be facilitated via anti-viral antibody responses that may prevent re-infection. However, viral escape and infection of leucocytes to promote lymphopenia, apparent CD8 T cell exhaustion coupled with a cytokine storm and vascular pathology appears to contribute to the damage in ARDS.

IMPLICATIONS

In contrast to ablative haematopoietic stem cell therapy, most multiple-sclerosis-related disease modifying therapies do not particularly target the innate immune system and few have any major long-term impact on CD8 T cells to limit protection against COVID-19. In addition, few block the formation of immature B cells within lymphoid tissue that will provide antibody-mediated protection from (re)infection. However, adjustments to dosing schedules may help de-risk the chance of infection further and reduce the concerns of people with MS being treated during the COVID-19 pandemic.