Only one fifth of young Australian adults have beliefs about medical imaging for low back pain that align with current evidence: A cross-sectional study

Beliefs regarding the use of imaging among patients with low back pain: A cross-sectional study in the context of a middle-income country

INTRODUCTION

Patients with low back pain may play an active role in the prescription of excessive spine imaging.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of patients with low back pain who have beliefs not aligned with current evidence regarding the use of imaging and to identify factors associated with these beliefs.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of baseline data of a previously published randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Outpatient physical therapy clinic in a middle-income country.

PATIENTS

Individuals with non-specific low back pain.

METHODS

Outcome variables were two statements assessing the extent of patient agreement on the need for imaging in the management of low back pain. The predictor variables were age, educational level, duration of symptoms, disability level, pain intensity in the last 24 hours, beliefs about inevitable consequences of low back pain (assessed using the Back Belief Questionnaire), and having received imaging previously. Multivariable logistic models were used for data analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Level of agreement with Statement 1: X-rays or scans are necessary to get the best medical care for low back pain and Statement 2: Everyone with low back pain should have spine imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients were included. Of these, 88.1% believed that imaging was necessary for the best medical care for low back pain and 62.9% believed that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging. Lower scores on the Back Belief Questionnaire were associated with beliefs that imaging was necessary (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.99) and low education level was associated with the belief that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging (OR = 3.03, 95% CI: 1.38, 6.61), after controlling for potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 90% of patients believe that spine imaging is necessary for the management of low back pain. Beliefs about the inevitable consequences of low back pain and low education level may be factors that need to be considered when developing new interventions.

A critical review of the role of manual therapy in the treatment of individuals with low back pain

The number of low back pain (LBP) cases is projected to increase to more than 800 million by 2050. To address the substantial burden of disease associated with this rise in prevalence, effective treatments are needed. While clinical practice guidelines (CPG) consistently recommend non-pharmacological therapies as first-line treatments, recommendations regarding manual therapy (MT) in treating low back pain vary. The goal of this narrative review was to critically summarize the available evidence for MT behind these recommendations, to scrutinize its mechanisms of action, and propose some actionable steps for clinicians on how this knowledge can be integrated into a person-centered approach. Despite disparate recommendations from CPG, MT is as effective as other available treatments and may be offered to patients with LBP, especially as part of a treatment package with exercise and education. Most of the effects of MT are not specific to the technique. MT and other interventions share several mechanisms of action that mediate treatment success. These mechanisms can encompass patients' expectations, prior experiences, beliefs and convictions, epistemic trust, and nonspecific contextual effects. Although MT is safer than opioids for patients with LBP, this alone is insufficient. Our goal is to encourage clinicians to shift away from outdated and refuted ideas in MT and embrace a person-centered approach rooted in a comprehensive biopsychosocial framework while incorporating patients' beliefs, addressing illness behaviors, and seeking to understand each patient's journey.

Do Maladaptive Imaging Beliefs Predict Self-Reported Pain Interference and Physical Function in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if maladaptive imaging beliefs correlated with, and predicted pain interference and physical function outcomes in people with musculoskeletal pain disorders. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients with musculoskeletal disorders receiving outpatient physical therapy from April 2022 to August 2023. METHODS: Four questions about imaging were asked to assess maladaptive beliefs, the need to rule out serious conditions, guide treatment, determine diagnosis, and validate symptoms. Correlations with beliefs and outcomes were assessed using Kendall's tau rank and Spearman's rho correlation coefficients. Generalized linear models determined if these beliefs predicted outcomes at baseline and 6 weeks. RESULTS: The cohort included 152 participants (mean [standard deviation] age: 56.13 [15.13]; 32.2% male). Maladaptive imaging beliefs correlated positively with pain interference and negatively with physical function. The need to rule out serious conditions and validate symptoms correlated with pain interference (range: τb = 0.17, 0.20; P = .003, .0121) and physical function (range: ρ = -0.22, -0.22; P = .006, .008). All but 1 belief correlated with pain interference (range: τb = 0.19, 0.24; P<.001, .004) and physical function (range: ρ = -0.26, -0.21; P = .001, .009) at 6 weeks. Each additional belief slightly increased pain interference at 6 weeks (β = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.03; P = .04) and lowered physical function at both baseline (β = -0.97; 95% CI: -1.66, -0.28; P = .01) and 6 weeks (β = -0.76; 95% CI: -1.37, -0.15; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Maladaptive imaging beliefs were significantly (albeit weakly) correlated with pain and physical function. Each additional maladaptive imaging belief increased pain interference at 6 weeks and lowered physical function at baseline and 6 weeks. Beliefs about the necessity of imaging to properly manage musculoskeletal disorders may influence outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(9):1-10. Epub 5 July 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12625.

Health literacy in medical imaging: a scoping review of current evidence and future directions

OBJECTIVE

The importance of health literacy in medical imaging is well recognized, yet the current landscape remains inadequately understood. This study aims to explore the extent of health literacy studies contextualized to medical imaging.

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted using three online bibliographic databases namely, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and CINAHL. We have adopted the concept of health literacy, as a clinical risk and personal asset, to guide this review.

RESULTS

Of 311 unique articles, 39 met our selection criteria. Five themes (categories) were identified by the authors: appropriate communication with patients who receive medical imaging test results, appropriate usage of medical imaging, classes and characteristics of eHealth literacy, disease/deterioration prevention, and patient education. Additionally, 17 health literacy assessment tools were identified, including 11 original creations. Finally, 11 recommendations have emerged from this scoping review, offering valuable insights into methods, considerations, and strategies for promoting health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Health literacy studies in medical imaging cover both clinical and public health perspectives, benefiting diverse populations, regardless of underlying medical conditions. Notably, the majority of assessment tools used in these studies were author-generated, hindering cross-study comparisons. Given the innate capacity of medical images to convey intuitive information, those images do not solely benefit the patients who are given medical imaging examinations, but they also hold significant potential to enhance public health literacy. Health literacy and medical imaging are closely associated and mutually reinforce each other.

What are patients' perspectives on the value of physical therapy? A prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To assess and identify patients' perceptions about the overall value of physical therapy services for musculoskeletal conditions and how these values were associated with their outcomes.

METHODS

The association between the perceived value of physical therapy (as a score) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and physical function at 6-weeks was assessed in a prospective cohort. Generalised linear models were used to identify relationships between the value of physical therapy score and PROMIS outcomes. Kendall's tau was used to identify correlations between responses and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 133 participants met the final inclusion criteria. The majority of participants were female (63.9%) with a mean age of 55.53 (SD 15.36) years. A majority of participants (63.9%) reported a previous positive personal experience with physical therapy. There was no significant relationship between perceived value of physical therapy and pain interference (β -0.32, p = 0.07, 95% CI-0.67, 0.03) or physical function (β 0.19, p = 0.29, 95% CI-0.16, 0.54). Stronger beliefs in agreement with the value of non-invasive treatment were significant, but weakly correlated with lower pain interference (r = -0.18, p = 0.048) and higher physical function scores (r = 0.22, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants had an overall positive perception of the value of physical therapy prior to initiating physical therapy, but this perception was not associated with 6-week pain and function outcomes. A better understanding of the driving factors encouraging patients to seek physical therapy services is needed to provide value-based care.

Removing Pathoanatomical Content From Information Pamphlets About Knee Osteoarthritis Did Not Affect Beliefs About Imaging or Surgery, but Led to Lower Perceptions That Exercise Is Damaging and Better Osteoarthritis Knowledge: An Online Randomised Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: Compare the effects of osteoarthritis information, with or without pathoanatomical content, on people's beliefs about managing osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Online randomized controlled trial involving 556 participants. METHODS: Participants considered a hypothetical scenario where their doctor informed them that they had knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized to a control condition, where they received currently available osteoarthritis information with pathoanatomical content or an experimental condition, where they received the same osteoarthritis information but without pathoanatomical content. Primary outcomes were participants' beliefs about the need for x-ray to confirm diagnosis and joint replacement surgery in the future. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences in primary outcomes for x-ray (mean difference [MD], -0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.9, 0.4) and surgery (MD, -0.2; 95% CI: -0.7, 0.2), each rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale. Participants in the experimental group had lower perceptions that exercise would damage the knee (MD, -0.4; 95% CI: -0.8, 0.0; rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale) and better osteoarthritis knowledge (MD, 0.9; 95% CI: 0.0, 1.9; rated on a scale ranging from 11 to 55). Among those without tertiary education, participants in the experimental group had lower perceptions that x-ray was necessary than control (MD, -0.8; 95% CI: -1.5, -0.1). Among those who had never sought care for knee pain, participants in the experimental group had lower perceptions about the need for surgery (MD, -0.7; 95% CI: -1.2, -0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Removing pathoanatomical content may not change beliefs about imaging and surgery but may lead to lower perceptions that exercise is damaging and may improve osteoarthritis knowledge. However, effects were small and of unclear clinical relevance. Tertiary education or a history of care seeking for knee pain may moderate effects on primary outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(4):1-15. Epub: 12 December 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.11618.