Genetics and genomic competency of Turkish nurses: A descriptive cross-sectional study

Developing Policy Infrastructure to Guide Genomics-Informed Oncology Nursing in Canada: An Interpretive Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND

Genomic technologies such as genetic testing and precision treatments are rapidly becoming routine in oncology care, and nurses play an increasingly important role in supporting the growing demands for genomics-informed healthcare. Policy infrastructure such as competencies, standards, scope of practice statements, and education and curriculum frameworks are urgently needed to guide these practice and education changes.

PURPOSE

This study is part of a larger three-phase project to develop recommendations and catalyze action for genomics-informed oncology nursing education and practice for the Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology and the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing. This phase aimed to enhance understanding of policy needs and action drivers for genomics-informed oncology nursing education and practice through the perspectives of Canadian oncology nurses and patient partners.

METHODS

Interpretive description methodology guided the study. Twenty semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted; 17 with oncology nurses in various domains of practice, and three with patient partner representatives. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently.

RESULTS

Our analysis identified three themes: 1) nurses and patients recognize that it is time for action, 2) nurses and patients see advantages to executing intentional, strategic, and collaborative policy development, and 3) leadership and advocacy are required to drive action.

CONCLUSION

Nursing policy infrastructure is required to increase genomic literacy, support nurses in providing safe patient care, and establish clear roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities within the interdisciplinary team. Strong leadership and advocacy at the practice, organizational, and systems levels are vital to accelerating action.

Essentials of genomics in nursing undergraduate education: A discussion paper

AIM

To map the 2021 American Association of Colleges of Nursing Essentials to the American Nurses Association Essentials of Genomic Nursing for all nurses and provide resources for nursing faculty to support the seamless integration of genomics into existing undergraduate curricula.

BACKGROUND

Since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, rapid advancements in genomic science leading to practical applications of genomics have revolutionized all areas of healthcare. Nursing is built on foundational life sciences, including genomics. As the largest segment of the healthcare workforce, who spend the most time with patients and families, nurses play a critical role in healthcare teams integrating genomic knowledge into patient care to improve health and well-being. Consequently, nurses must be equipped with foundational genomic knowledge and skills during their undergraduate education. However, there is wide variability in whether and how nursing programs have incorporated genomics into their curricula. Additionally, nursing faculty may have limited knowledge of foundational genomic concepts and lack confidence in teaching genomics.

DESIGN

Discussion paper METHODS: We aligned domains from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing Essentials and American Nurses Association Essentials of Genomic Nursing.

RESULTS

A map illustrating alignment in multiple areas, which provide examples of ways to integrate genomics into existing nursing curricula.

CONCLUSION

Although based on domains developed in the United States, the map, curricular resources, example learning outcomes, and clinical vignettes can be used by nursing faculty globally to prepare future nurses who are competent in providing genomics-informed nursing care on entry-to-practice.

Predictors and outcomes of genomic knowledge among nurses in a middle eastern country: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Genomics has received significant attention in recent years. Nurses can uniquely contribute to the field of genomics and improve genomic healthcare. However, they lack the necessary knowledge to accomplish this, impacting their confidence, willingness, and ability to implement genomics healthcare negatively. Given Oman's unique healthcare context, its prospective genomics application, and the global trend toward genomic competency, it is essential to gauge nurses' genomic knowledge as basis for equipping them.

AIM

This study assessed the genomic knowledge among nurses in the Sultanate of Oman. It also explored the predictors and outcomes of their genomic knowledge.

DESIGN

This study used a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design.

SETTINGS

Nurses from four public hospitals in Muscat Governorate, Sultanate of Oman were recruited to participate in the study.

METHODS

A total of 661 out of 700 nurses responded to the pen and paper self-report questionnaire (94 % response rate). Univariate, bivariate, and regression analyses were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Consistent with international studies, nurses in Oman had low to moderate genomic knowledge. Years of experience in genetics healthcare and working in either the surgical and maternity units were positively associated with higher genomic knowledge. Working in the bone marrow transplant unit and having a family history of consanguinity were associated with poorer genomic knowledge. Higher genomic knowledge was associated with an increased willingness to care for patients with genetic issues, higher confidence in providing genomic healthcare, and a lower intention to pursue continuing education on genomics.

CONCLUSION

Strategies targeting variables, particularly those that are amenable to interventions, should be developed and implemented to foster genomic knowledge in nurses.

Nursing strategies to address health disparities in genomics-informed care: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to map the available global evidence on strategies that nurses can use to facilitate genomics-informed health care to address health disparities to inform the development of a research and action agenda.

INTRODUCTION

The integration of genomics into health care is improving patient outcomes through better prevention, diagnostics, and treatment; however, scholars have noted concerns with widening health disparities. Nurses work across the health system and can address health disparities from a clinical, research, education, policy, and leadership perspective. To do this, a comprehensive understanding of existing genomics-informed strategies is required.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Published (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods studies, systematic and literature reviews and text and opinion papers) and unpublished (gray) literature that focuses on genomics-informed nursing strategies to address health disparities over the last 10 years were included. No limitations were placed on language.

METHODS

The review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search was undertaken on May 25, 2023, across 5 databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). Gray literature was searched through websites, including the International Society of Nurses in Genetics and the Global Genomics Nursing Alliance. Abstracts, titles, and full texts were screened by 2 or more independent reviewers. Data were extracted using a data extraction tool. The coded data were analyzed by 2 or more independent reviewers using conventional content analysis and the summarized results are presented using descriptive statistics and evidence tables.

RESULTS

In total, we screened 818 records and 31 were included in the review. The majority of papers were published in either 2019 (n=5, 16%), 2020 (n=5, 16%), or 2021 (n=5, 16%). Most papers came from the United States (n=25, 81%) followed by the Netherlands (n=3, 10%), United Kingdom (n=1, 3%), Tanzania (n=1, 3%) and written from a global perspective (n=1, 3%). Nearly half the papers discussed cancer-related conditions (n=14, 45%) and most of the others did not specify a disease or condition (n=12, 30%). In terms of population, nurse clinicians were mentioned the most frequently (n=16, 52%) followed by nurse researchers, scholars, or scientists (n=8, 26%). The patient population varied, with African American patients or communities (n=7, 23%) and racial or ethnic minorities (n=6, 19%) discussed most frequently. The majority of equity issues focused on inequitable access to genetic and genomics health services amongst ethnic and racial groups (n=14, 45%), individuals with lower educational attainment or health literacy (n=6, 19%), individuals with lower socioeconomic status (n=3, 10%), migrants (n=3, 10%), individuals with lack of insurance coverage (n=2, 6%), individuals living in rural or remote areas (n=1, 3%) individuals of older age (n=1, 3%). Root causes contributing to health disparity issues varied at the patient, provider, and system levels. Strategies were grouped into 2 categories: those to prepare the nursing workforce and those nurses can implement in practice. We further categorized the strategies by domains of practice, including clinical practice, education, research, policy advocacy, and leadership. Papers that mentioned strategies focused on preparing the nursing workforce were largely related to the education domain (n=16, 52%), while papers that mentioned strategies that nurses can implement were mostly related to clinical practice (n=19, 61%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses in all domains of practice can draw on the identified strategies to address health disparities related to genomics in health care. We found a notable lack of intervention and evaluation studies exploring the impact on health and equity outcomes. Additional research informed by implementation science and that measures health outcomes is needed to identify best practices.

SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT

A French-language version of the abstract of this review is available as Supplemental Digital Content [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A65 ].

Developing leadership competencies for genomics integration through globally networked learning and education

Aim

To describe the implementation and evaluation of an education strategy called the globally networked learning-genomics (GNL-G) used in Master's courses in Canada and Finland. The study focused on the feasibility and effectiveness of GNL-G in developing leadership competencies for integrating genomics into practice.

Methods

Interpretive description qualitative methodology was used to explore how GNL-G, global exchanges and assignments standardized with the Assessment of Strategies to Integrate Genomics in Nursing (ASIGN) tool influenced competency development. The Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) framework guided the design, implementation, evaluation, and reporting of GNL-G. Data included one-to-one interviews, written assignments, and reflections.

Results

Interviews and assignment data from three cohorts of students for a total of ten Canadian and 11 Finnish master's students participated in this study. The ASIGN Tool played a crucial role in facilitating students' analysis of their practice context and the development of leadership strategies. Participation in GNL-G enhanced students' confidence to lead efforts to integrate genomics, irrespective of their genomics expertise. Engagement with global peers emphasized the importance of incorporating equity, ethics, and social justice into leadership strategies for genomics integration.

Conclusion

The GNL-G strategy enhanced leadership competencies for genomics integration in graduate students from Canada and Finland. The ASIGN Tool and global peer collaboration highlight the importance of innovative educational methods in preparing leaders for the complexities of genomics in healthcare.

Genomics-informed nursing strategies and health equity: A scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review is to map the available evidence on strategies that nurses can use to facilitate genomics-informed healthcare to address health disparities.

INTRODUCTION

Advancements in genomics over the last two decades have led to an increase in the delivery of genomics-informed health care. Although the integration of genomics into health care services continues to enhance patient outcomes, access to genomic technologies is not equitable, exacerbating existing health disparities amongst certain populations. As the largest portion of the health workforce, nurses play a critical role in the delivery of equitable genomics-informed care. However, little is known about how nurses can help address health disparities within the context of genomics-informed health care. A review of the literature will provide the necessary foundation to identify promising practices, policy, and knowledge gaps for further areas of inquiry.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

We will include papers that explore strategies that nurses can undertake to facilitate genomics-informed care to address health disparities.

METHODS

This review will be conducted using JBI methodology for scoping reviews. We will search electronic databases including MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsychInfo, and CINAHL for quantitative and qualitative studies, systematic reviews and grey literature. Theses, books, and unavailable full-text papers will be excluded. The search will be limited to papers from 2013 and beyond. Two reviewers will screen titles and abstracts followed by full-text and disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. We will use a data extraction tool using Microsoft Excel and analyse data using descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis. Findings will be presented in the form of evidence tables and a narrative summary. We will report findings using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

DISCUSSION

Genomics will continue to transform all aspects of health care across the wellness continuum from prevention, assessment, diagnosis, management, treatment, and palliative care. The identification of nursing strategies to address health disparities will build the foundation for policy and practice to ensure that the integration of genomic technologies benefits everyone.

The effects of decision aids for genetic counselling among people considering genetic testing: A systematic review

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of decision aids for genetic counsellees to improve their conflicts in decision-making and psychological well-being when considering genetic tests for inherited genetic diseases, and their knowledge about these tests and their genetic risks.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Six electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID Nursing, APA PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched from inception to May 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Only randomised controlled trials that examined the effect of decision aids for information provision centring genetic testing on outcomes including decisional conflicts, informed choice making, knowledge on genetic risks or genetic tests, and psychological outcomes among participants who had undergone genetic counselling were included. Their risk of bias was assessed using the Version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials. Results were presented narratively. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist.

RESULTS

Eight included studies examined the effect of booklet-based, computer-based, film-based or web-based decision aids on individuals considering genetic testing for their increased cancer risks. Despite contrasting findings across studies, they showed that decision aids enable genetic counsellees to feel more informed in decision-making on genetic tests, although most showed no effect on decisional conflict. Knowledge of genetic counsellees on genetic risks and genetic tests were increased after the use of decision aids. Most studies showed no significant effect on any psychological outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Review findings corroborate the use of decision aids to enhance the effective delivery of genetic counselling, enabling genetic counsellees to gain more knowledge of genetic tests and feel more informed in making decisions to have these tests.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Decision aids can be used to support nurse-led genetic counselling for better knowledge acquisition and decision-making among counsellees.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patient or public contribution is not applicable as this is a systematic review.

Genetics and genomics knowledge and competency of Chinese nurses based on the theory of diffusion of innovation: A descriptive cross-sectional study

Background

Nurses are responsible for providing genetics and genomics health care services, including disease risk assessment, medical referrals, and advocating for communities and individuals who probably benefit from genomics and genetics services.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate Chinese nurses' understanding and previous training in genomics and genetics. Additionally, we aimed to understand the degree to which Chinese nurses use genomics and genetics knowledge in their daily practice and to assess the learning needs regarding genomics and genetics.

Method

This study utilized the design of a descriptive cross-sectional study. From January 18 to March 15, 2022, 406 registered nurses from the Shandong province of China working in clinical institutions and with good English proficiency were recruited as study subjects. Nurses' demographic data and data related to genetic knowledge and competency were collected using the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) questionnaire. Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests were utilized to investigate the descriptive statistics and non-normally distributed data.

Results

There are 406 nurses from Shandong Province, China participated in the study. Among them, BSN degrees accounted for 83.7%. Female nurses accounted for 96.8%, and 40% are clinical nurses. Among such nurses, 65.5% reported that genetics was involved in their nursing courses, and 56.2% planned to study more knowledge associated with genetics. The mean knowledge score was 7.35 (out of 12). Nurses' gender, primary role, genomics education, and experience caring for patients with common diseases influenced nurses' scores on genetic and genomics knowledge.

Conclusion

The genomics knowledge and competency of Chinese nurses need to be further improved. Incorporating genomics into the standard nursing curriculum can effectively reduce the knowledge gap. Simultaneously, it is also necessary to improve the attention of senior nurses and nursing managers to genomics nursing and improve the clinical practice environment.

Genetic/genomic literacy, attitudes and receptivity of nursing students and practising nurses: A cross-sectional online survey

BACKGROUND

The growing demand for personalised nursing care in the genomic era requires nursing students and practising nurses to be better prepared to apply the knowledge of genetics/genomics to nursing practice. Several studies have shown that, despite having positive attitudes/receptivity towards integrating genetics/genomics into nursing practice, nursing students and professionals report a low level of genetic/genomic literacy. However, little is known about the status in Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed and compared the genetic/genomic literacy and attitudes/receptivity towards integrating genetics/genomics into nursing practice among nursing students and practising nurses in Hong Kong. We also explored the relationships between the students' background characteristics, attitudes/receptivity towards integrating genetics/genomics into nursing practice and genetic/genomic literacy.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional online survey conducted between March 2020 and January 2022.

SETTINGS

A government-funded university in Hong Kong.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited a convenience sample of 234 nursing students, 145 were final-year undergraduate students (median age = 22 years, 84.1 % female) and 89 were practising registered nurses (postgraduate students studying part-time programme, median age = 28 years, 77.5 % female).

METHODS

The survey collected the participants' background information, attitudes/receptivity towards integrating genetics/genomics into nursing practice and levels of genetic/genomic literacy.

RESULTS

Overall, the participants reported positive attitudes/receptivity towards practice integration but had low levels of genetic/genomic literacy. Practising nurses were more likely to have lower genetic/genomic literacy, but more positive attitudes/receptivity towards practice integration, than undergraduate students. Multiple regression analysis suggested that the level of study (postgraduate/undergraduate programme) and perceptions of the disadvantages of 'needing to re-tool professionally' were significant independent factors associated with the level of genetic/genomic literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study call for the strategic integration of genetics/genomics education into all levels of nursing education in Hong Kong and across the globe. In particular, sustained efforts should be made to ensure that practising nurses receive further education in genetics/genomics.

Genetic and genomic nursing competency among nurses in tertiary general hospitals and cancer hospitals in mainland China: a nationwide survey

OBJECTIVES

To explore genetic/genomic nursing competency and associated factors among nurses from tertiary general and specialist cancer hospitals in mainland China and compare the competencies of nurses from the two types of hospitals.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional survey was conducted from November 2019 to January 2020, wherein 2118 nurses were recruited from 8 tertiary general hospitals and 4 cancer hospitals in mainland China. We distributed electronic questionnaires to collect data on nurses' demographics, work-related variables and genomic nursing competency.

PARTICIPANTS

2118 nurses were recruited via a three-stage stratified cluster sampling method.

RESULTS

More than half (59.1%, 1252/2118) of the participants reported that their curriculum included genetics/genomics content. The mean nurses' genomic knowledge score was 8.30/12 (95% CI=8.21 to 8.39). Only 5.4% had always collected a complete family history in the past 3 months. Compared with general hospital nurses, slightly more cancer hospital nurses (75.6% vs 70.6%, p=0.010) recognised the importance of genomics, while there was no significant difference in the knowledge scores (8.38 vs 8.21, p>0.05). Gender (β=0.06, p=0.005), years of clinical nursing (β=-0.07, p=0.002), initial level of nursing education (β=0.10, p<0.001), membership of the Chinese Nursing Association (β=0.06, p=0.004), whether their curriculum included genetics/genomics content (β=0.08, p=0.001) and attitude towards becoming more educated in genetics/genomics (β=0.25, p<0.001) were significantly associated with the nurses' genomic knowledge score.

CONCLUSION

The levels of genomic knowledge among mainland Chinese nurses in tertiary hospitals were moderate. The overall genomic competency of cancer hospital nurses was comparable to that of general hospital nurses. Further genomic training is needed for nurses in China to increase their genomic competency and accelerate the integration of genomics into nursing practice.