Strategies for multivariate analyses of imaging genetics study in Alzheimer's disease

Compositional brain scores capture Alzheimer's disease-specific structural brain patterns along the disease continuum

INTRODUCTION

Traditional multivariate methods for neuroimaging studies overlook the interdependent relationship between brain features. This study addresses this gap by analyzing relative brain volumetric patterns to capture how Alzheimer's disease (AD) and genetics influence brain structure along the disease continuum.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from participants across the AD continuum from the Alzheimer's and Families (ALFA) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) studies. Compositional data analysis (CoDA) was exploited to examine relative brain volumetric variations that (1) were linked to different AD stages compared to cognitively unimpaired amyloid-β-negative (CU A-) individuals and (2) varied by AD genetic risk.

RESULTS

Disease stage-specific compositional brain scores were identified, differentiating CU A- individuals from those in more advanced stages. Genetic risk-stratified models revealed a broader genetic landscape affecting brain morphology in AD, beyond the well-known apolipoprotein E ε4 allele.

DISCUSSION

CoDA emerges as an alternative multivariate framework to deepen understanding of AD-related structural changes and support targeted interventions for those at higher genetic risk.

HIGHLIGHTS

Compositional data analysis (CoDA) revealed the relative variation of brain region volumes, captured in compositional brain scores, capable of discerning between cognitively unimpaired amyloid-β-negative individuals and subjects within other disease-stage groups along the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum. CoDA also uncovered the genetic vulnerability of specific brain regions at each stage of the disease along the continuum. CoDA is capable of integrating magnetic resonance imaging data from two different cohorts without stringent requirements for harmonization. This translates as an advantage, compared to traditional methods, and strengthens the reliability of cross-study comparisons by standardizing the data despite different labeling agreements, facilitating collaborative and large-scale research. The algorithm is sensitive to AD-specific effects, as the main compositional brain scores display little overlap with the age-specific compositional brain score. CoDA provides a more accurate analysis of brain imaging data addressing its compositional nature, which can influence the development of targeted approaches, opening new avenues for enhancing brain health.

aXonica: A support package for MRI based Neuroimaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) assists in studying the nervous system. MRI scans undergo significant processing before presenting the final images to medical practitioners. These processes are executed with ease due to excellent software pipelines. However, establishing software workstations is non-trivial and requires researchers in life sciences to be comfortable in downloading, installing, and scripting software that is non-user-friendly and may lack basic GUI. As researchers struggle with these skills, there is a dire need to develop software packages that can automatically install software pipelines speeding up building software workstations and laboratories. Previous solutions include NeuroDebian, BIDS Apps, Flywheel, QMENTA, Boutiques, Brainlife and Neurodesk. Overall, all these solutions complement each other. NeuroDebian covers neuroscience and has a wider scope, providing only 51 tools for MRI. Whereas, BIDS Apps is committed to the BIDS format, covering only 45 software related to MRI. Boutiques is more flexible, facilitating its pipelines to be easily installed as separate containers, validated, published, and executed. Whereas, both Flywheel and Qmenta are propriety, leaving four for users looking for 'free for use' tools, i.e., NeuroDebian, Brainlife, Neurodesk, and BIDS Apps. This paper presents an extensive survey of 317 tools published in MRI-based neuroimaging in the last ten years, along with 'aXonica,' an MRI-based neuroimaging support package that is unbiased towards any formatting standards and provides 130 applications, more than that of NeuroDebian (51), BIDS App (45), Flywheel (70), and Neurodesk (85). Using a technology stack that employs GUI as the front-end and shell scripted back-end, aXonica provides (i) 130 tools that span the entire MRI-based neuroimaging analysis, and allow the user to (ii) select the software of their choice, (iii) automatically resolve individual dependencies and (iv) installs them. Hence, aXonica can serve as an important resource for researchers and teachers working in the field of MRI-based Neuroimaging to (a) develop software workstations, and/or (b) install newer tools in their existing workstations.

A multi-task SCCA method for brain imaging genetics and its application in neurodegenerative diseases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In brain imaging genetics, multi-task sparse canonical correlation analysis (MTSCCA) is effective to study the bi-multivariate associations between genetic variations such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and multi-modal imaging quantitative traits (QTs). However, most existing MTSCCA methods are neither supervised nor capable of distinguishing the shared patterns of multi-modal imaging QTs from the specific patterns.

METHODS

A new diagnosis-guided MTSCCA (DDG-MTSCCA) with parameter decomposition and graph-guided pairwise group lasso penalty was proposed. Specifically, the multi-tasking modeling paradigm enables us to comprehensively identify risk genetic loci by jointly incorporating multi-modal imaging QTs. The regression sub-task was raised to guide the selection of diagnosis-related imaging QTs. To reveal the diverse genetic mechanisms, the parameter decomposition and different constraints were utilized to facilitate the identification of modality-consistent and -specific genotypic variations. Besides, a network constraint was added to find out meaningful brain networks. The proposed method was applied to synthetic data and two real neuroimaging data sets respectively from Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) and Parkinson's progression marker initiative (PPMI) databases.

RESULTS

Compared with the competitive methods, the proposed method exhibited higher or comparable canonical correlation coefficients (CCCs) and better feature selection results. In particular, in the simulation study, DDG-MTSCCA showed the best anti-noise ability and achieved the highest average hit rate, about 25% higher than MTSCCA. On the real data of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), our method obtained the highest average testing CCCs, about 40% ∼ 50% higher than MTSCCA. Especially, our method could select more comprehensive feature subsets, and the top five SNPs and imaging QTs were all disease-related. The ablation experimental results also demonstrated the significance of each component in the model, i.e., the diagnosis guidance, parameter decomposition, and network constraint.

CONCLUSIONS

These results on simulated data, ADNI and PPMI cohorts suggested the effectiveness and generalizability of our method in identifying meaningful disease-related markers. DDG-MTSCCA could be a powerful tool in brain imaging genetics, worthy of in-depth study.

Inferring the Genetic Influences on Psychological Traits Using MRI Connectivity Predictive Models: Demonstration with Cognition

Introduction

Genetic correlations between brain and behavioral phenotypes in analyses from major genetic consortia have been weak and mostly nonsignificant. fMRI models of systems-level brain patterns may help improve our ability to link genes, brains, and behavior by identifying reliable and reproducible endophenotypes. Work using connectivity-based predictive modeling has generated brain-based proxies of behavioral and neuropsychological variables. If such models capture activity in inherited brain systems, they may offer a more powerful link between genes and behavior.

Method

As a proof of concept, we develop models predicting intelligence (IQ) based on fMRI connectivity and test their effectiveness as endophenotypes. We link brain and IQ in a model development dataset of N = 3,000 individuals and test the genetic correlations between brain models and measured IQ in a genetic validation sample of N = 13,092 individuals from the UK Biobank. We compare an additive connectivity-based model to multivariate LASSO and ridge models phenotypically and genetically. We also compare these approaches to single "candidate" brain areas.

Results

We found that predictive brain models were significantly phenotypically correlated with IQ and showed much stronger correlations than individual edges. Further, brain models were more heritable (h2 = 0.155-0.181) than single brain regions (h2 = 0.038-0.118) and captured about half of the genetic variance in IQ (rG = 0.422-0.576), while rGs with single brain measures were smaller and nonsignificant. For the different approaches, LASSO and ridge were similarly predictive, with slightly weaker performance of the additive model. LASSO model weights were highly theoretically interpretable and replicated known brain IQ associations. Finally, functional connectivity models trained in midlife showed genetic correlations with early life correlates of IQ, suggesting some stability in the prediction of fMRI models.

Conclusion

Multisystem predictive models hold promise as imaging endophenotypes that offer complex and theoretically relevant conclusions for future imaging genetics research.

A review of brain imaging biomarker genomics in Alzheimer’s disease: implementation and perspectives

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with phenotypic changes closely associated with both genetic variants and imaging pathology. Brain imaging biomarker genomics has been developed in recent years to reveal potential AD pathological mechanisms and provide early diagnoses. This technique integrates multimodal imaging phenotypes with genetic data in a noninvasive and high-throughput manner. In this review, we summarize the basic analytical framework of brain imaging biomarker genomics and elucidate two main implementation scenarios of this technique in AD studies: (1) exploring novel biomarkers and seeking mutual interpretability and (2) providing a diagnosis and prognosis for AD with combined use of machine learning methods and brain imaging biomarker genomics. Importantly, we highlight the necessity of brain imaging biomarker genomics, discuss the strengths and limitations of current methods, and propose directions for development of this research field.