P300 correlates with tDCS response in minimally conscious state patients

Effects of parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in prolonged disorders of consciousness: A pilot study

Objective

Although the parietal cortex is related to consciousness, the dorsolateral prefrontal and primary motor cortices are the usual targets for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC). Herein, we applied parietal rTMS to patients with pDoC, to verify its neurobehavioral effects and explore a new potential rTMS target.

Materials and methods

Twenty-six patients with pDoC were assigned to a rTMS or sham group. The rTMS group received 10 sessions of parietal rTMS; the sham group received 10 sessions of sham stimulation. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) and event-related potential (ERP) were collected before and after the 10 sessions or sham sessions.

Results

After the 10 sessions, the rTMS group showed: a significant CRS-R score increase; ERP appearance of a P300 waveform and significantly increased Fz amplitudes; increased potentials on topographic mapping, especially in the left prefrontal cortex; and an increase in delta and theta band powers at Fz, Cz, and Pz. The sham group did not show such changes in CRS-R score or ERP results statistically.

Conclusion

Parietal rTMS shows promise as a novel intervention in the recovery of consciousness in pDoC. It showed neurobehavioral enhancement of residual brain function and may promote frontal activity by enhancing frontal-parietal connections. The parietal cortex may thus be an alternative for rTMS therapy protocols.

An update on noninvasive neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness

BACKGROUND

With the improvement of emergency techniques, the survival rate of patients with severe brain injury has increased. However, this has also led to an annual increase in the number of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC). Hence, recovery of consciousness is an important part of treatment. With advancing techniques, noninvasive neuromodulation seems a promising intervention. The objective of this review was to summarize the latest techniques and provide the basis for protocols of noninvasive neuromodulations in pDoC.

METHODS

This review summarized the advances in noninvasive neuromodulation in the treatment of pDoC in the last 5 years.

RESULTS

Variable techniques of neuromodulation are used in pDoC. Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) are very new techniques, while transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are still the hotspots in pDoC. Median nerve electrical stimulation (MNS) has received little attention in the last 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive neuromodulation is a valuable and promising technique to treat pDoC. Further studies are needed to determine a unified stimulus protocol to achieve optimal effects as well as safety.

Multimodal approaches supporting the diagnosis, prognosis and investigation of neural correlates of disorders of consciousness: A systematic review

The limits of the standard, behaviour-based clinical assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) prompted the employment of functional neuroimaging, neurometabolic, neurophysiological and neurostimulation techniques, to detect brain-based covert markers of awareness. However, uni-modal approaches, consisting in employing just one of those techniques, are usually not sufficient to provide an exhaustive exploration of the neural underpinnings of residual awareness. This systematic review aimed at collecting the evidence from studies employing a multimodal approach, that is, combining more instruments to complement DoC diagnosis, prognosis and better investigating their neural correlates. Following the PRISMA guidelines, records from PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus were screened to select peer-review original articles in which a multi-modal approach was used for the assessment of adult patients with a diagnosis of DoC. Ninety-two observational studies and 32 case reports or case series met the inclusion criteria. Results highlighted a diagnostic and prognostic advantage of multi-modal approaches that involve electroencephalography-based (EEG-based) measurements together with neuroimaging or neurometabolic data or with neurostimulation. Multimodal assessment deepened the knowledge on the neural networks underlying consciousness, by showing correlations between the integrity of the default mode network and the different clinical diagnosis of DoC. However, except for studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography, the integration of more than one technique in most of the cases occurs without an a priori-designed multi-modal diagnostic approach. Our review supports the feasibility and underlines the advantages of a multimodal approach for the diagnosis, prognosis and for the investigation of neural correlates of DoCs.

A Comparison of the Neuromodulation Effects of Frontal and Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Disorders of Consciousness

Frontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and parietal tDCS are effective for treating disorders of consciousness (DoC); however, the relative efficacies of these techniques have yet to be determined. This paper compares the neuromodulation effects of frontal and parietal tDCS on DoC. Twenty patients with DoC were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups. One group received single-session frontal tDCS and single-session sham tDCS. The other group received single-session parietal tDCS and single-session sham tDCS. Before and after every tDCS session, we recorded coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R) values and an electroencephalogram. CRS-R was also used to evaluate the state of consciousness at 9-12-month follow-up. Both single-session frontal and parietal tDCS caused significant changes in the genuine permutation cross-mutual information (G_PCMI) of local frontal and across brain regions (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the changes in G_PCMI values were significantly correlated to the CRS-R scores at 9-12-month follow-up after frontal and parietal tDCS (p < 0.05). The changes in G_PCMI and CRS-R scores were also correlated (p < 0.05). Both frontal tDCS and parietal tDCS exert neuromodulatory effects in DoC and induce significant changes in electrophysiology. G_PCMI can be used to evaluate the neuromodulation effects of tDCS.