1
|
Chen P, Yang H, Zheng X, Jia H, Hao J, Xu X, Li C, He X, Chen R, Okubo TS, Cui Z. Group-common and individual-specific effects of structure-function coupling in human brain networks with graph neural networks. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.11.22.568257. [PMID: 38045396 PMCID: PMC10690242 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.22.568257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
The human cerebral cortex is organized into functionally segregated but synchronized regions bridged by the structural connectivity of white matter pathways. While structure-function coupling has been implicated in cognitive development and neuropsychiatric disorders, it remains unclear to what extent the structure-function coupling reflects a group-common characteristic or varies across individuals, at both the global and regional brain levels. By leveraging two independent, high-quality datasets, we found that the graph neural network accurately predicted unseen individuals' functional connectivity from structural connectivity, reflecting a strong structure-function coupling. This coupling was primarily driven by network topology and was substantially stronger than that of the correlation approaches. Moreover, we observed that structure-function coupling was dominated by group-common effects, with subtle yet significant individual-specific effects. The regional group and individual effects of coupling were hierarchically organized across the cortex along a sensorimotor-association axis, with lower group and higher individual effects in association cortices. These findings emphasize the importance of considering both group and individual effects in understanding cortical structure-function coupling, suggesting insights into interpreting individual differences of the coupling and informing connectivity-guided therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiyu Chen
- Beijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 102206, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing; Beijing, 102206, China
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Hang Yang
- Beijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 102206, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing; Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Xin Zheng
- Beijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 102206, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing; Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Hai Jia
- Beijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 102206, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing; Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Jiachang Hao
- Beijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 102206, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing; Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Xiaoyu Xu
- Beijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 102206, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing; Beijing, 102206, China
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100091, China
| | - Chao Li
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0WA, UK
| | - Xiaosong He
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, China
| | - Runsen Chen
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Tatsuo S. Okubo
- Beijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 102206, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing; Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Zaixu Cui
- Beijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 102206, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing; Beijing, 102206, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parkes L, Kim JZ, Stiso J, Brynildsen JK, Cieslak M, Covitz S, Gur RE, Gur RC, Pasqualetti F, Shinohara RT, Zhou D, Satterthwaite TD, Bassett DS. A network control theory pipeline for studying the dynamics of the structural connectome. Nat Protoc 2024:10.1038/s41596-024-01023-w. [PMID: 39075309 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-024-01023-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Network control theory (NCT) is a simple and powerful tool for studying how network topology informs and constrains the dynamics of a system. Compared to other structure-function coupling approaches, the strength of NCT lies in its capacity to predict the patterns of external control signals that may alter the dynamics of a system in a desired way. An interesting development for NCT in the neuroscience field is its application to study behavior and mental health symptoms. To date, NCT has been validated to study different aspects of the human structural connectome. NCT outputs can be monitored throughout developmental stages to study the effects of connectome topology on neural dynamics and, separately, to test the coherence of empirical datasets with brain function and stimulation. Here, we provide a comprehensive pipeline for applying NCT to structural connectomes by following two procedures. The main procedure focuses on computing the control energy associated with the transitions between specific neural activity states. The second procedure focuses on computing average controllability, which indexes nodes' general capacity to control the dynamics of the system. We provide recommendations for comparing NCT outputs against null network models, and we further support this approach with a Python-based software package called 'network control theory for python'. The procedures in this protocol are appropriate for users with a background in network neuroscience and experience in dynamical systems theory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linden Parkes
- Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Jason Z Kim
- Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Stiso
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julia K Brynildsen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sydney Covitz
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fabio Pasqualetti
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dale Zhou
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dani S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barzon G, Artime O, Suweis S, Domenico MD. Unraveling the mesoscale organization induced by network-driven processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2317608121. [PMID: 38968099 PMCID: PMC11252804 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2317608121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Complex systems are characterized by emergent patterns created by the nontrivial interplay between dynamical processes and the networks of interactions on which these processes unfold. Topological or dynamical descriptors alone are not enough to fully embrace this interplay in all its complexity, and many times one has to resort to dynamics-specific approaches that limit a comprehension of general principles. To address this challenge, we employ a metric-that we name Jacobian distance-which captures the spatiotemporal spreading of perturbations, enabling us to uncover the latent geometry inherent in network-driven processes. We compute the Jacobian distance for a broad set of nonlinear dynamical models on synthetic and real-world networks of high interest for applications from biological to ecological and social contexts. We show, analytically and computationally, that the process-driven latent geometry of a complex network is sensitive to both the specific features of the dynamics and the topological properties of the network. This translates into potential mismatches between the functional and the topological mesoscale organization, which we explain by means of the spectrum of the Jacobian matrix. Finally, we demonstrate that the Jacobian distance offers a clear advantage with respect to traditional methods when studying human brain networks. In particular, we show that it outperforms classical network communication models in explaining functional communities from structural data, therefore highlighting its potential in linking structure and function in the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Barzon
- Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padua, Padova35131, Italy
- Complex Human Behaviour Lab, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Povo38123, Italy
| | - Oriol Artime
- Departament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona08028, Spain
- Institute of Complex Systems, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona08028, Spain
- Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma07122, Spain
| | - Samir Suweis
- Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padua, Padova35131, Italy
- Department of Physics and Astronomy “G. Galilei”, University of Padova, Padova35131, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, Padova35131, Italy
| | - Manlio De Domenico
- Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padua, Padova35131, Italy
- Department of Physics and Astronomy “G. Galilei”, University of Padova, Padova35131, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, Padova35131, Italy
- Padua Center for Network Medicine, University of Padova, Padova35131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fouladivanda M, Iraji A, Wu L, van Erp TG, Belger A, Hawamdeh F, Pearlson GD, Calhoun VD. A spatially constrained independent component analysis jointly informed by structural and functional network connectivity. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.08.13.553101. [PMID: 38853973 PMCID: PMC11160563 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.13.553101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
There are a growing number of neuroimaging studies motivating joint structural and functional brain connectivity. Brain connectivity of different modalities provides insight into brain functional organization by leveraging complementary information, especially for brain disorders such as schizophrenia. In this paper, we propose a multi-modal independent component analysis (ICA) model that utilizes information from both structural and functional brain connectivity guided by spatial maps to estimate intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs). Structural connectivity is estimated through whole-brain tractography on diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI), while functional connectivity is derived from resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). The proposed structural-functional connectivity and spatially constrained ICA (sfCICA) model estimates ICNs at the subject level using a multi-objective optimization framework. We evaluated our model using synthetic and real datasets (including dMRI and rs-fMRI from 149 schizophrenia patients and 162 controls). Multi-modal ICNs revealed enhanced functional coupling between ICNs with higher structural connectivity, improved modularity, and network distinction, particularly in schizophrenia. Statistical analysis of group differences showed more significant differences in the proposed model compared to the unimodal model. In summary, the sfCICA model showed benefits from being jointly informed by structural and functional connectivity. These findings suggest advantages in simultaneously learning effectively and enhancing connectivity estimates using structural connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahshid Fouladivanda
- Tri-institute Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS Center), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Armin Iraji
- Tri-institute Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS Center), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lei Wu
- Tri-institute Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS Center), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Theodorus G.M. van Erp
- Clinical Translational Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Aysenil Belger
- Department of Psychiatry Director, Neuroimaging Research in Psychiatry Director, Clinical Translational Core, UNC Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Faris Hawamdeh
- Center for Disaster Informatics and Computational Epidemiology (DICE), Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Godfrey D. Pearlson
- Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Vince D. Calhoun
- Tri-institute Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS Center), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoo S, Jang Y, Hong SJ, Park H, Valk SL, Bernhardt BC, Park BY. Whole-brain structural connectome asymmetry in autism. Neuroimage 2024; 288:120534. [PMID: 38340881 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder is a common neurodevelopmental condition that manifests as a disruption in sensory and social skills. Although it has been shown that the brain morphology of individuals with autism is asymmetric, how this differentially affects the structural connectome organization of each hemisphere remains under-investigated. We studied whole-brain structural connectivity-based brain asymmetry in individuals with autism using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging obtained from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange initiative. By leveraging dimensionality reduction techniques, we constructed low-dimensional representations of structural connectivity and calculated their asymmetry index. Comparing the asymmetry index between individuals with autism and neurotypical controls, we found atypical structural connectome asymmetry in the sensory and default-mode regions, particularly showing weaker asymmetry towards the right hemisphere in autism. Network communication provided topological underpinnings by demonstrating that the inferior temporal cortex and limbic and frontoparietal regions showed reduced global network communication efficiency and decreased send-receive network navigation in the inferior temporal and lateral visual cortices in individuals with autism. Finally, supervised machine learning revealed that structural connectome asymmetry could be used as a measure for predicting communication-related autistic symptoms and nonverbal intelligence. Our findings provide insights into macroscale structural connectome alterations in autism and their topological underpinnings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seulki Yoo
- Convergence Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yurim Jang
- Artificial Intelligence Convergence Research Center, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Jun Hong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea; Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunjin Park
- Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea; School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sofie L Valk
- Forschungszentrum Julich, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Boris C Bernhardt
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bo-Yong Park
- Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea; Department of Data Science, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Department of Statistics and Data Science, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Puxeddu MG, Faskowitz J, Seguin C, Yovel Y, Assaf Y, Betzel R, Sporns O. Relation of connectome topology to brain volume across 103 mammalian species. PLoS Biol 2024; 22:e3002489. [PMID: 38315722 PMCID: PMC10868790 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The brain connectome is an embedded network of anatomically interconnected brain regions, and the study of its topological organization in mammals has become of paramount importance due to its role in scaffolding brain function and behavior. Unlike many other observable networks, brain connections incur material and energetic cost, and their length and density are volumetrically constrained by the skull. Thus, an open question is how differences in brain volume impact connectome topology. We address this issue using the MaMI database, a diverse set of mammalian connectomes reconstructed from 201 animals, covering 103 species and 12 taxonomy orders, whose brain size varies over more than 4 orders of magnitude. Our analyses focus on relationships between volume and modular organization. After having identified modules through a multiresolution approach, we observed how connectivity features relate to the modular structure and how these relations vary across brain volume. We found that as the brain volume increases, modules become more spatially compact and dense, comprising more costly connections. Furthermore, we investigated how spatial embedding shapes network communication, finding that as brain volume increases, nodes' distance progressively impacts communication efficiency. We identified modes of variation in network communication policies, as smaller and bigger brains show higher efficiency in routing- and diffusion-based signaling, respectively. Finally, bridging network modularity and communication, we found that in larger brains, modular structure imposes stronger constraints on network signaling. Altogether, our results show that brain volume is systematically related to mammalian connectome topology and that spatial embedding imposes tighter restrictions on larger brains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Grazia Puxeddu
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Joshua Faskowitz
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Caio Seguin
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Yossi Yovel
- School of Neurobiology, Biochemistry and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yaniv Assaf
- School of Neurobiology, Biochemistry and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Richard Betzel
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Olaf Sporns
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carozza S, Akarca D, Astle D. The adaptive stochasticity hypothesis: Modeling equifinality, multifinality, and adaptation to adversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2307508120. [PMID: 37816058 PMCID: PMC10589678 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2307508120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Neural phenotypes are the result of probabilistic developmental processes. This means that stochasticity is an intrinsic aspect of the brain as it self-organizes over a protracted period. In other words, while both genomic and environmental factors shape the developing nervous system, another significant-though often neglected-contributor is the randomness introduced by probability distributions. Using generative modeling of brain networks, we provide a framework for probing the contribution of stochasticity to neurodevelopmental diversity. To mimic the prenatal scaffold of brain structure set by activity-independent mechanisms, we start our simulations from the medio-posterior neonatal rich club (Developing Human Connectome Project, n = 630). From this initial starting point, models implementing Hebbian-like wiring processes generate variable yet consistently plausible brain network topologies. By analyzing repeated runs of the generative process (>107 simulations), we identify critical determinants and effects of stochasticity. Namely, we find that stochastic variation has a greater impact on brain organization when networks develop under weaker constraints. This heightened stochasticity makes brain networks more robust to random and targeted attacks, but more often results in non-normative phenotypic outcomes. To test our framework empirically, we evaluated whether stochasticity varies according to the experience of early-life deprivation using a cohort of neurodiverse children (Centre for Attention, Learning and Memory; n = 357). We show that low-socioeconomic status predicts more stochastic brain wiring. We conclude that stochasticity may be an unappreciated contributor to relevant developmental outcomes and make specific predictions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Carozza
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 7EF, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA02115
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA02115
| | - Danyal Akarca
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 7EF, United Kingdom
| | - Duncan Astle
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 7EF, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 0SZ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Milisav F, Bazinet V, Iturria-Medina Y, Misic B. Resolving inter-regional communication capacity in the human connectome. Netw Neurosci 2023; 7:1051-1079. [PMID: 37781139 PMCID: PMC10473316 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Applications of graph theory to the connectome have inspired several models of how neural signaling unfolds atop its structure. Analytic measures derived from these communication models have mainly been used to extract global characteristics of brain networks, obscuring potentially informative inter-regional relationships. Here we develop a simple standardization method to investigate polysynaptic communication pathways between pairs of cortical regions. This procedure allows us to determine which pairs of nodes are topologically closer and which are further than expected on the basis of their degree. We find that communication pathways delineate canonical functional systems. Relating nodal communication capacity to meta-analytic probabilistic patterns of functional specialization, we also show that areas that are most closely integrated within the network are associated with higher order cognitive functions. We find that these regions' proclivity towards functional integration could naturally arise from the brain's anatomical configuration through evenly distributed connections among multiple specialized communities. Throughout, we consider two increasingly constrained null models to disentangle the effects of the network's topology from those passively endowed by spatial embedding. Altogether, the present findings uncover relationships between polysynaptic communication pathways and the brain's functional organization across multiple topological levels of analysis and demonstrate that network integration facilitates cognitive integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Milisav
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Vincent Bazinet
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Yasser Iturria-Medina
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Bratislav Misic
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Seguin C, Sporns O, Zalesky A. Brain network communication: concepts, models and applications. Nat Rev Neurosci 2023; 24:557-574. [PMID: 37438433 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-023-00718-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Understanding communication and information processing in nervous systems is a central goal of neuroscience. Over the past two decades, advances in connectomics and network neuroscience have opened new avenues for investigating polysynaptic communication in complex brain networks. Recent work has brought into question the mainstay assumption that connectome signalling occurs exclusively via shortest paths, resulting in a sprawling constellation of alternative network communication models. This Review surveys the latest developments in models of brain network communication. We begin by drawing a conceptual link between the mathematics of graph theory and biological aspects of neural signalling such as transmission delays and metabolic cost. We organize key network communication models and measures into a taxonomy, aimed at helping researchers navigate the growing number of concepts and methods in the literature. The taxonomy highlights the pros, cons and interpretations of different conceptualizations of connectome signalling. We showcase the utility of network communication models as a flexible, interpretable and tractable framework to study brain function by reviewing prominent applications in basic, cognitive and clinical neurosciences. Finally, we provide recommendations to guide the future development, application and validation of network communication models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caio Seguin
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - Olaf Sporns
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Indiana University Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sahoo S, Tadić B, Chutani M, Gupte N. Effect of hidden geometry and higher-order interactions on the synchronization and hysteresis behavior of phase oscillators on 5-clique simplicial assemblies. Phys Rev E 2023; 108:034309. [PMID: 37849205 DOI: 10.1103/physreve.108.034309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
The hidden geometry of simplicial complexes can influence the collective dynamics of nodes in different ways depending on the simplex-based interactions of various orders and competition between local and global structural features. We study a system of phase oscillators attached to nodes of four-dimensional simplicial complexes and interacting via positive/negative edges-based pairwise K_{1} and triangle-based triple K_{2}≥0 couplings. Three prototypal simplicial complexes are grown by aggregation of 5-cliques, controlled by the chemical affinity parameter ν, resulting in sparse, mixed, and compact architecture, all of which have 1-hyperbolic graphs but different spectral dimensions. By changing the interaction strength K_{1}∈[-4,2] along the forward and backward sweeps, we numerically determine individual phases of each oscillator and a global order parameter to measure the level of synchronization. Our results reveal how different architectures of simplicial complexes, in conjunction with the interactions and internal-frequency distributions, impact the shape of the hysteresis loop and lead to patterns of locally synchronized groups that hinder global network synchronization. Remarkably, these groups are differently affected by the size of the shared faces between neighboring 5-cliques and the presence of higher-order interactions. At K_{1}<0, partial synchronization is much higher in the compact community than in the assemblies of cliques sharing single nodes, at least occasionally. These structures also partially desynchronize at a lower triangle-based coupling K_{2} than the compact assembly. Broadening of the internal frequency distribution gradually reduces the synchronization level in the mixed and sparse communities, even at positive pairwise couplings. The order-parameter fluctuations in these partially synchronized states are quasicyclical with higher harmonics, described by multifractal analysis and broad singularity spectra.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Sahoo
- Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
- Center for Complex Systems & Dynamics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
| | - Bosiljka Tadić
- Department of Theoretical Physics, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Complexity Science Hub, Josephstaedterstrasse 39, Vienna, Austria
| | - Malayaja Chutani
- Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
| | - Neelima Gupte
- Center for Complex Systems & Dynamics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
- Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu X, Tyler LK, Cam-Can, Davis SW, Rowe JB, Tsvetanov KA. Cognition's dependence on functional network integrity with age is conditional on structural network integrity. Neurobiol Aging 2023; 129:195-208. [PMID: 37392579 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
Maintaining good cognitive function is crucial for well-being across the lifespan. We proposed that the degree of cognitive maintenance is determined by the functional interactions within and between large-scale brain networks. Such connectivity can be represented by the white matter architecture of structural brain networks that shape intrinsic neuronal activity into integrated and distributed functional networks. We explored how the function-structure connectivity convergence, and the divergence of functional connectivity from structural connectivity, contribute to the maintenance of cognitive function across the adult lifespan. Multivariate analyses were used to investigate the relationship between function-structure connectivity convergence and divergence with multivariate cognitive profiles, respectively. Cognitive function was increasingly dependent on function-structure connectivity convergence as age increased. The dependency of cognitive function on connectivity was particularly strong for high-order cortical networks and subcortical networks. The results suggest that brain functional network integrity sustains cognitive functions in old age, as a function of the integrity of the brain's structural connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xulin Liu
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Lorraine K Tyler
- The Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cam-Can
- Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN), MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon W Davis
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - James B Rowe
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamen A Tsvetanov
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; The Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Parkes L, Kim JZ, Stiso J, Brynildsen JK, Cieslak M, Covitz S, Gur RE, Gur RC, Pasqualetti F, Shinohara RT, Zhou D, Satterthwaite TD, Bassett DS. Using network control theory to study the dynamics of the structural connectome. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.23.554519. [PMID: 37662395 PMCID: PMC10473719 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.23.554519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Network control theory (NCT) is a simple and powerful tool for studying how network topology informs and constrains dynamics. Compared to other structure-function coupling approaches, the strength of NCT lies in its capacity to predict the patterns of external control signals that may alter dynamics in a desired way. We have extensively developed and validated the application of NCT to the human structural connectome. Through these efforts, we have studied (i) how different aspects of connectome topology affect neural dynamics, (ii) whether NCT outputs cohere with empirical data on brain function and stimulation, and (iii) how NCT outputs vary across development and correlate with behavior and mental health symptoms. In this protocol, we introduce a framework for applying NCT to structural connectomes following two main pathways. Our primary pathway focuses on computing the control energy associated with transitioning between specific neural activity states. Our second pathway focuses on computing average controllability, which indexes nodes' general capacity to control dynamics. We also provide recommendations for comparing NCT outputs against null network models. Finally, we support this protocol with a Python-based software package called network control theory for python (nctpy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linden Parkes
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Jason Z Kim
- Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Jennifer Stiso
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA
| | | | - Matthew Cieslak
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sydney Covitz
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Fabio Pasqualetti
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Dale Zhou
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Dani S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Astle DE, Johnson MH, Akarca D. Toward computational neuroconstructivism: a framework for developmental systems neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci 2023; 27:726-744. [PMID: 37263856 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Brain development is underpinned by complex interactions between neural assemblies, driving structural and functional change. This neuroconstructivism (the notion that neural functions are shaped by these interactions) is core to some developmental theories. However, due to their complexity, understanding underlying developmental mechanisms is challenging. Elsewhere in neurobiology, a computational revolution has shown that mathematical models of hidden biological mechanisms can bridge observations with theory building. Can we build a similar computational framework yielding mechanistic insights for brain development? Here, we outline the conceptual and technical challenges of addressing this theory gap, and demonstrate that there is great potential in specifying brain development as mathematically defined processes operating within physical constraints. We provide examples, alongside broader ingredients needed, as the field explores computational explanations of system-wide development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan E Astle
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK; MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | - Mark H Johnson
- Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK; Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, WC1E 7JL, UK
| | - Danyal Akarca
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Seguin C, Jedynak M, David O, Mansour S, Sporns O, Zalesky A. Communication dynamics in the human connectome shape the cortex-wide propagation of direct electrical stimulation. Neuron 2023; 111:1391-1401.e5. [PMID: 36889313 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
Communication between gray matter regions underpins all facets of brain function. We study inter-areal communication in the human brain using intracranial EEG recordings, acquired following 29,055 single-pulse direct electrical stimulations in a total of 550 individuals across 20 medical centers (average of 87 ± 37 electrode contacts per subject). We found that network communication models-computed on structural connectivity inferred from diffusion MRI-can explain the causal propagation of focal stimuli, measured at millisecond timescales. Building on this finding, we show that a parsimonious statistical model comprising structural, functional, and spatial factors can accurately and robustly predict cortex-wide effects of brain stimulation (R2=46% in data from held-out medical centers). Our work contributes toward the biological validation of concepts in network neuroscience and provides insight into how connectome topology shapes polysynaptic inter-areal signaling. We anticipate that our findings will have implications for research on neural communication and the design of brain stimulation paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caio Seguin
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - Maciej Jedynak
- Aix-Marseille Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes (INS) UMR1106, Marseille 13005, France
| | - Olivier David
- Aix-Marseille Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes (INS) UMR1106, Marseille 13005, France
| | - Sina Mansour
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Olaf Sporns
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Comparing models of information transfer in the structural brain network and their relationship to functional connectivity: diffusion versus shortest path routing. Brain Struct Funct 2023; 228:651-662. [PMID: 36723674 PMCID: PMC9944050 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-023-02613-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The relationship between structural and functional connectivity in the human brain is a core question in network neuroscience, and a topic of paramount importance to our ability to meaningfully describe and predict functional outcomes. Graph theory has been used to produce measures based on the structural connectivity network that are related to functional connectivity. These measures are commonly based on either the shortest path routing model or the diffusion model, which carry distinct assumptions about how information is transferred through the network. Unlike shortest path routing, which assumes the most efficient path is always known, the diffusion model makes no such assumption, and lets information diffuse in parallel based on the number of connections to other regions. Past research has also developed hybrid measures that use concepts from both models, which have better predicted functional connectivity from structural connectivity than the shortest path length alone. We examined the extent to which each of these models can account for the structure-function relationship of interest using graph theory measures that are exclusively based on each model. This analysis was performed on multiple parcellations of the Human Connectome Project using multiple approaches, which all converged on the same finding. We found that the diffusion model accounts for much more variance in functional connectivity than the shortest path routing model, suggesting that the diffusion model is better suited to describing the structure-function relationship in the human brain at the macroscale.
Collapse
|
16
|
de Bartolomeis A, De Simone G, Ciccarelli M, Castiello A, Mazza B, Vellucci L, Barone A. Antipsychotics-Induced Changes in Synaptic Architecture and Functional Connectivity: Translational Implications for Treatment Response and Resistance. Biomedicines 2022; 10:3183. [PMID: 36551939 PMCID: PMC9776416 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness characterized by alterations in processes that regulate both synaptic plasticity and functional connectivity between brain regions. Antipsychotics are the cornerstone of schizophrenia pharmacological treatment and, beyond occupying dopamine D2 receptors, can affect multiple molecular targets, pre- and postsynaptic sites, as well as intracellular effectors. Multiple lines of evidence point to the involvement of antipsychotics in sculpting synaptic architecture and remodeling the neuronal functional unit. Furthermore, there is an increasing awareness that antipsychotics with different receptor profiles could yield different interregional patterns of co-activation. In the present systematic review, we explored the fundamental changes that occur under antipsychotics' administration, the molecular underpinning, and the consequences in both acute and chronic paradigms. In addition, we investigated the relationship between synaptic plasticity and functional connectivity and systematized evidence on different topographical patterns of activation induced by typical and atypical antipsychotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea de Bartolomeis
- Section of Psychiatry, Laboratory of Translational and Molecular Psychiatry and Unit of Treatment-Resistant Psychosis, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University Medical School of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Puxeddu MG, Faskowitz J, Sporns O, Astolfi L, Betzel RF. Multi-modal and multi-subject modular organization of human brain networks. Neuroimage 2022; 264:119673. [PMID: 36257489 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The human brain is a complex network of anatomically interconnected brain areas. Spontaneous neural activity is constrained by this architecture, giving rise to patterns of statistical dependencies between the activity of remote neural elements. The non-trivial relationship between structural and functional connectivity poses many unsolved challenges about cognition, disease, development, learning and aging. While numerous studies have focused on statistical relationships between edge weights in anatomical and functional networks, less is known about dependencies between their modules and communities. In this work, we investigate and characterize the relationship between anatomical and functional modular organization of the human brain, developing a novel multi-layer framework that expands the classical concept of multi-layer modularity. By simultaneously mapping anatomical and functional networks estimated from different subjects into communities, this approach allows us to carry out a multi-subject and multi-modal analysis of the brain's modular organization. Here, we investigate the relationship between anatomical and functional modules during resting state, finding unique and shared structures. The proposed framework constitutes a methodological advance in the context of multi-layer network analysis and paves the way to further investigate the relationship between structural and functional network organization in clinical cohorts, during cognitively demanding tasks, and in developmental or lifespan studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Grazia Puxeddu
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Joshua Faskowitz
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Olaf Sporns
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Laura Astolfi
- Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, 00185, Italy; IRCCS, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, 00142, Italy
| | - Richard F Betzel
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hansen JY, Shafiei G, Markello RD, Smart K, Cox SML, Nørgaard M, Beliveau V, Wu Y, Gallezot JD, Aumont É, Servaes S, Scala SG, DuBois JM, Wainstein G, Bezgin G, Funck T, Schmitz TW, Spreng RN, Galovic M, Koepp MJ, Duncan JS, Coles JP, Fryer TD, Aigbirhio FI, McGinnity CJ, Hammers A, Soucy JP, Baillet S, Guimond S, Hietala J, Bedard MA, Leyton M, Kobayashi E, Rosa-Neto P, Ganz M, Knudsen GM, Palomero-Gallagher N, Shine JM, Carson RE, Tuominen L, Dagher A, Misic B. Mapping neurotransmitter systems to the structural and functional organization of the human neocortex. Nat Neurosci 2022; 25:1569-1581. [PMID: 36303070 PMCID: PMC9630096 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01186-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Neurotransmitter receptors support the propagation of signals in the human brain. How receptor systems are situated within macro-scale neuroanatomy and how they shape emergent function remain poorly understood, and there exists no comprehensive atlas of receptors. Here we collate positron emission tomography data from more than 1,200 healthy individuals to construct a whole-brain three-dimensional normative atlas of 19 receptors and transporters across nine different neurotransmitter systems. We found that receptor profiles align with structural connectivity and mediate function, including neurophysiological oscillatory dynamics and resting-state hemodynamic functional connectivity. Using the Neurosynth cognitive atlas, we uncovered a topographic gradient of overlapping receptor distributions that separates extrinsic and intrinsic psychological processes. Finally, we found both expected and novel associations between receptor distributions and cortical abnormality patterns across 13 disorders. We replicated all findings in an independently collected autoradiography dataset. This work demonstrates how chemoarchitecture shapes brain structure and function, providing a new direction for studying multi-scale brain organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Y Hansen
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Golia Shafiei
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Ross D Markello
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Kelly Smart
- Yale PET Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sylvia M L Cox
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Nørgaard
- Department of Psychology, Center for Reproducible Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Cimbi & OpenNeuroPET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vincent Beliveau
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Cimbi & OpenNeuroPET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Yanjun Wu
- Yale PET Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jean-Dominique Gallezot
- Yale PET Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Étienne Aumont
- Cognitive Pharmacology Research Unit, UQAM, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Stijn Servaes
- McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Gleb Bezgin
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas Funck
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Taylor W Schmitz
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - R Nathan Spreng
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marian Galovic
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- MRI Unit, Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont Saint Peter, UK
| | - Matthias J Koepp
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- MRI Unit, Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont Saint Peter, UK
| | - John S Duncan
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- MRI Unit, Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont Saint Peter, UK
| | - Jonathan P Coles
- Department of Medicine, Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tim D Fryer
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Franklin I Aigbirhio
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Colm J McGinnity
- King's College London and Guy's and St. Thomas' PET Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alexander Hammers
- King's College London and Guy's and St. Thomas' PET Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jean-Paul Soucy
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Sylvain Baillet
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Synthia Guimond
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychoeducation and Psychology, University of Quebec in Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada
| | - Jarmo Hietala
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Marc-André Bedard
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Cognitive Pharmacology Research Unit, UQAM, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marco Leyton
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Eliane Kobayashi
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Pedro Rosa-Neto
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Melanie Ganz
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Cimbi & OpenNeuroPET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gitte M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Cimbi & OpenNeuroPET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicola Palomero-Gallagher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- C. and O. Vogt Institute for Brain Research, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - James M Shine
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard E Carson
- Yale PET Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lauri Tuominen
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Alain Dagher
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Bratislav Misic
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|