1
|
Abtout A, Reingruber J. Analysis of dim-light responses in rod and cone photoreceptors with altered calcium kinetics. J Math Biol 2023; 87:69. [PMID: 37823947 PMCID: PMC10570263 DOI: 10.1007/s00285-023-02005-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Rod and cone photoreceptors in the retina of vertebrates are the primary sensory neurons underlying vision. They convert light into an electrical current using a signal transduction pathway that depends on Ca[Formula: see text] feedback. It is known that manipulating the Ca[Formula: see text] kinetics affects the response shape and the photoreceptor sensitivity, but a precise quantification of these effects remains unclear. We have approached this task in mouse retina by combining numerical simulations with mathematical analysis. We consider a parsimonious phototransduction model that incorporates negative Ca[Formula: see text] feedback onto the synthesis of cyclic GMP, and fast buffering reactions to alter the Ca[Formula: see text] kinetics. We derive analytic results for the photoreceptor functioning in sufficiently dim light conditions depending on the photoreceptor type. We exploit these results to obtain conceptual and quantitative insight into how response waveform and amplitude depend on the underlying biophysical processes and the Ca[Formula: see text] feedback. With a low amount of buffering, the Ca[Formula: see text] concentration changes in proportion to the current, and responses to flashes of light are monophasic. With more buffering, the change in the Ca[Formula: see text] concentration becomes delayed with respect to the current, which gives rise to a damped oscillation and a biphasic waveform. This shows that biphasic responses are not necessarily a manifestation of slow buffering reactions. We obtain analytic approximations for the peak flash amplitude as a function of the light intensity, which shows how the photoreceptor sensitivity depends on the biophysical parameters. Finally, we study how changing the extracellular Ca[Formula: see text] concentration affects the response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annia Abtout
- Institute of Biology, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
| | - Jürgen Reingruber
- Institute of Biology, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
- INSERM, U1024, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akula JD, Lancos AM, AlWattar BK, De Bruyn H, Hansen RM, Fulton AB. A Simplified Model of Activation and Deactivation of Human Rod Phototransduction-An Electroretinographic Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2023; 64:36. [PMID: 37738060 PMCID: PMC10528468 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.12.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To test the hypothesis that a simple model having properties consistent with activation and deactivation in the rod approximates the whole time course of the photoresponse. Methods Routinely, an exponential of the form f = α·(1 - exp(-(τ·(t - teff)s-1))), with amplitude α, rate constant τ (often scaled by intensity), irreducible delay teff, and time exponent s-1, is fit to the early period of the flash electroretinogram. Notably, s (an integer) represents the three integrating stages in the rod amplification cascade (rhodopsin isomerization, transducin activation, and cGMP hydrolysis). The time course of the photoresponse to a 0.17 cd·s·m-2 conditioning flash (CF) was determined in 21 healthy eyes by presenting the CF plus a bright probe flash (PF) in tandem, separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 0.01 to 1.4 seconds, and calculating the proportion of the PF a-wave suppressed by the CF at each ISI. To test if similar kinetics describe deactivation, difference of exponential (DoE) functions with common α and teff parameters, respective rate constants for the initiation (I) and quenching (Q) phases of the response, and specified values of s (sI, sQ), were compared to the photoresponse time course. Results As hypothesized, the optimal values of sI and sQ were 3 and 2, respectively. Mean ± SD α was 0.80 ± 0.066, I was 7700 ± 2400 m2·cd-1·s-3, and Q was 1.4 ± 0.47 s-1. Overall, r2 was 0.93. Conclusions A method, including a DoE model with just three free parameters (α, I, Q), that robustly captures the magnitude and time-constants of the complete rod response, was produced. Only two steps integrate to quench the rod photoresponse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D. Akula
- Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Annie M. Lancos
- Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Bilal K. AlWattar
- Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Hanna De Bruyn
- Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Ronald M. Hansen
- Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Anne B. Fulton
- Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Skiba NP, Lewis TR, Spencer WJ, Castillo CM, Shevchenko A, Arshavsky VY. Absolute Quantification of Photoreceptor Outer Segment Proteins. J Proteome Res 2023; 22:2703-2713. [PMID: 37493966 PMCID: PMC10513726 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Photoreceptor cells generate neuronal signals in response to capturing light. This process, called phototransduction, takes place in a highly specialized outer segment organelle. There are significant discrepancies in the reported amounts of many proteins supporting this process, particularly those of low abundance, which limits our understanding of their molecular organization and function. In this study, we used quantitative mass spectrometry to simultaneously determine the abundances of 20 key structural and functional proteins residing in mouse rod outer segments. We computed the absolute number of molecules of each protein residing within an individual outer segment and the molar ratio among all 20 proteins. The molar ratios of proteins comprising three well-characterized constitutive complexes in outer segments differed from the established subunit stoichiometries of these complexes by less than 7%, highlighting the exceptional precision of our quantification. Overall, this study resolves multiple existing discrepancies regarding the outer segment abundances of these proteins, thereby advancing our understanding of how the phototransduction pathway functions as a single, well-coordinated molecular ensemble.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolai P. Skiba
- Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Tylor R. Lewis
- Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - William J. Spencer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Carson M. Castillo
- Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Andrej Shevchenko
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany 01307
| | - Vadim Y. Arshavsky
- Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hofmann KP, Lamb TD. Rhodopsin, light-sensor of vision. Prog Retin Eye Res 2023; 93:101116. [PMID: 36273969 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The light sensor of vertebrate scotopic (low-light) vision, rhodopsin, is a G-protein-coupled receptor comprising a polypeptide chain with bound chromophore, 11-cis-retinal, that exhibits remarkable physicochemical properties. This photopigment is extremely stable in the dark, yet its chromophore isomerises upon photon absorption with 70% efficiency, enabling the activation of its G-protein, transducin, with high efficiency. Rhodopsin's photochemical and biochemical activities occur over very different time-scales: the energy of retinaldehyde's excited state is stored in <1 ps in retinal-protein interactions, but it takes milliseconds for the catalytically active state to form, and many tens of minutes for the resting state to be restored. In this review, we describe the properties of rhodopsin and its role in rod phototransduction. We first introduce rhodopsin's gross structural features, its evolution, and the basic mechanisms of its activation. We then discuss light absorption and spectral sensitivity, photoreceptor electrical responses that result from the activity of individual rhodopsin molecules, and recovery of rhodopsin and the visual system from intense bleaching exposures. We then provide a detailed examination of rhodopsin's molecular structure and function, first in its dark state, and then in the active Meta states that govern its interactions with transducin, rhodopsin kinase and arrestin. While it is clear that rhodopsin's molecular properties are exquisitely honed for phototransduction, from starlight to dawn/dusk intensity levels, our understanding of how its molecular interactions determine the properties of scotopic vision remains incomplete. We describe potential future directions of research, and outline several major problems that remain to be solved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Peter Hofmann
- Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité, and, Zentrum für Biophysik und Bioinformatik, Humboldt-Unversität zu Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
| | - Trevor D Lamb
- Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caruso G, Klaus C, Hamm HE, Gurevich VV, Bisegna P, Andreucci D, DiBenedetto E, Makino CL. Pepperberg plot: Modeling flash response saturation in retinal rods of mouse. Front Mol Neurosci 2023; 15:1054449. [PMID: 36710929 PMCID: PMC9880052 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.1054449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Retinal rods evolved to be able to detect single photons. Despite their exquisite sensitivity, rods operate over many log units of light intensity. Several processes inside photoreceptor cells make this incredible light adaptation possible. Here, we added to our previously developed, fully space resolved biophysical model of rod phototransduction, some of the mechanisms that play significant roles in shaping the rod response under high illumination levels: the function of RGS9 in shutting off G protein transducin, and calcium dependences of the phosphorylation rates of activated rhodopsin, of the binding of cGMP to the light-regulated ion channel, and of two membrane guanylate cyclase activities. A well stirred version of this model captured the responses to bright, saturating flashes in WT and mutant mouse rods and was used to explain "Pepperberg plots," that graph the time during which the response is saturated against the natural logarithm of flash strength for bright flashes. At the lower end of the range, saturation time increases linearly with the natural logarithm of flash strength. The slope of the relation (τD) is dictated by the time constant of the rate-limiting (slowest) step in the shutoff of the phototransduction cascade, which is the hydrolysis of GTP by transducin. We characterized mathematically the X-intercept ( Φ o ) which is the number of photoisomerizations that just saturates the rod response. It has been observed that for flash strengths exceeding a few thousand photoisomerizations, the curves depart from linearity. Modeling showed that the "upward bend" for very bright flash intensities could be explained by the dynamics of RGS9 complex and further predicted that there would be a plateau at flash strengths giving rise to more than ~107 photoisomerizations due to activation of all available PDE. The model accurately described alterations in saturation behavior of mutant murine rods resulting from transgenic perturbations of the cascade targeting membrane guanylate cyclase activity, and expression levels of GRK, RGS9, and PDE. Experimental results from rods expressing a mutant light-regulated channel purported to lack calmodulin regulation deviated from model predictions, suggesting that there were other factors at play.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Caruso
- Italian National Research Council, Istituto di Scienze del Patrimonio Culturale, Rome, Italy
| | - Colin Klaus
- The College of Public Health Division of Biostatistics and The Mathematical Biosciences Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Heidi E. Hamm
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Vsevolod V. Gurevich
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Paolo Bisegna
- Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Andreucci
- Department of Basic and Applied Sciences for Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Clint L. Makino
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States,*Correspondence: Clint L. Makino,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lamb TD. Photoreceptor physiology and evolution: cellular and molecular basis of rod and cone phototransduction. J Physiol 2022; 600:4585-4601. [PMID: 35412676 PMCID: PMC9790638 DOI: 10.1113/jp282058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The detection of light in the vertebrate retina utilizes a duplex system of closely related rod and cone photoreceptors: cones respond extremely rapidly, and operate at 'photopic' levels of illumination, from moonlight upwards; rods respond much more slowly, thereby obtaining greater sensitivity, and function effectively only at 'scotopic' levels of moonlight and lower. Rods and cones employ distinct isoforms of many of the proteins in the phototransduction cascade, and they thereby represent a unique evolutionary system, whereby the same process (the detection of light) uses a distinct set of genes in two classes of cell. The molecular mechanisms of phototransduction activation are described, and the classical quantitative predictions for the onset phase of the electrical response to light are developed. Recent work predicting the recovery phase of the rod's response to intense flashes is then presented, that provides an accurate account of the time that the response spends in saturation. Importantly, this also provides a new estimate for the rate at which a single rhodopsin activates molecules of the G-protein, transducin, that is substantially higher than other estimates in the literature. Finally, the evolutionary origin of the phototransduction proteins in rods and cones is examined, and it is shown that most of the rod/cone differences were established at the first of the two rounds of whole-genome duplication more than 500 million years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor D. Lamb
- Eccles Institute of NeuroscienceJohn Curtin School of Medical ResearchThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralian Capital TerritoryAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abtout A, Fain G, Reingruber J. Analysis of waveform and amplitude of mouse rod and cone flash responses. J Physiol 2021; 599:3295-3312. [PMID: 33977528 DOI: 10.1113/jp281225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
KEY POINTS Most vertebrate eyes have rod and cone photoreceptors, which use a signal transduction pathway consisting of many biological processes to transform light into an electrical response. We dissect and quantify the contribution of each of these processes to the photoreceptor light response by using a novel method of analysis that provides an analytical solution for the entire time course of the dim-flash light response. We find that the shape of the light response is exclusively controlled by deactivation parameters. Activation parameters scale this shape and alter the response amplitude. We show that the rising phase of the response depends on Ca2+ feedback, and we identify the deactivation parameters that control the recovery phase of the response. We devise new methods to extract values for deactivation and activation parameters from a separate analysis of response shape and response amplitude. ABSTRACT Vertebrate eyes have rod and cone photoreceptors, which use a complex transduction pathway comprising many biological processes to transform the absorption of light into an electrical response. A fundamental question in sensory transduction is how these processes contribute to the response. To study this question, we use a well-accepted phototransduction model, which we analyse with a novel method based on the log transform of the current. We derive an analytical solution that describes the entire time course of the photoreceptor response to dim flashes of light. We use this solution to dissect and quantify the contribution of each process to the response. We find that the entire dim-flash response is proportional to the flash intensity. By normalizing responses to unit amplitude, we define a waveform that is independent of the light intensity and characterizes the invariant shape of dim-flash responses. We show that this waveform is exclusively determined by deactivation rates; activation rates only scale the waveform and affect the amplitude. This analysis corrects a previous assumption that the rising phase is determined entirely by activation rates. We further show that the rising phase depends on Ca2+ feedback to the cyclase, contrary to current belief. We identify the deactivation rates that control the recovery phase of the response, and we devise new methods to extract activation and deactivation rates from an analysis of response shape and response amplitude. In summary, we provide a comprehensive understanding of how the various transduction processes produce the cellular response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annia Abtout
- Institut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
| | - Gordon Fain
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology and Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Functional modulation of phosphodiesterase-6 by calcium in mouse rod photoreceptors. Sci Rep 2021; 11:8938. [PMID: 33903621 PMCID: PMC8076185 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88140-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Phosphodiesterase-6 (PDE6) is a key protein in the G-protein cascade converting photon information to bioelectrical signals in vertebrate photoreceptor cells. Here, we demonstrate that PDE6 is regulated by calcium, contrary to the common view that PDE1 is the unique PDE class whose activity is modulated by intracellular Ca2+. To broaden the operating range of photoreceptors, mammalian rod photoresponse recovery is accelerated mainly by two calcium sensor proteins: recoverin, modulating the lifetime of activated rhodopsin, and guanylate cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs), regulating the cGMP synthesis. We found that decreasing rod intracellular Ca2+ concentration accelerates the flash response recovery and increases the basal PDE6 activity (βdark) maximally by ~ 30% when recording local electroretinography across the rod outer segment layer from GCAPs-/- recoverin-/- mice. Our modeling shows that a similar elevation in βdark can fully explain the observed acceleration of flash response recovery in low Ca2+. Additionally, a reduction of the free Ca2+ in GCAPs-/- recoverin-/- rods shifted the inhibition constants of competitive PDE inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) against the thermally activated and light-activated forms of PDE6 to opposite directions, indicating a complex interaction between IBMX, PDE6, and calcium. The discovered regulation of PDE6 is a previously unknown mechanism in the Ca2+-mediated modulation of rod light sensitivity.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rod Photoreceptors Avoid Saturation in Bright Light by the Movement of the G Protein Transducin. J Neurosci 2021; 41:3320-3330. [PMID: 33593858 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2817-20.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Rod photoreceptors can be saturated by exposure to bright background light, so that no flash superimposed on the background can elicit a detectable response. This phenomenon, called increment saturation, was first demonstrated psychophysically by Aguilar and Stiles and has since been shown in many studies to occur in single rods. Recent experiments indicate, however, that rods may be able to avoid saturation under some conditions of illumination. We now show in ex vivo electroretinogram and single-cell recordings that in continuous and prolonged exposure even to very bright light, the rods of mice from both sexes recover as much as 15% of their dark current and that responses can persist for hours. In parallel to recovery of outer segment current is an ∼10-fold increase in the sensitivity of rod photoresponses. This recovery is decreased in transgenic mice with reduced light-dependent translocation of the G protein transducin. The reduction in outer-segment transducin together with a novel mechanism of visual-pigment regeneration within the rod itself enable rods to remain responsive over the whole of the physiological range of vision. In this way, rods are able to avoid an extended period of transduction channel closure, which is known to cause photoreceptor degeneration.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Rods are initially saturated in bright light so that no flash superimposed on the background can elicit a detectable response. Frederiksen and colleagues show in whole retina and single-cell recordings that, if the background light is prolonged, rods slowly recover and can continue to produce significant responses over the entire physiological range of vision. Response recovery occurs by translocation of the G protein transducin from the rod outer to the inner segment, together with a novel mechanism of visual-pigment regeneration within the rod itself. Avoidance of saturation in bright light may be one of the principal mechanisms the retina uses to keep rod outer-segment channels from ever closing for too long a time, which is known to produce photoreceptor degeneration.
Collapse
|
10
|
Light responses of mammalian cones. Pflugers Arch 2021; 473:1555-1568. [PMID: 33742309 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-021-02551-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cone photoreceptors provide the foundation of most of human visual experience, but because they are smaller and less numerous than rods in most mammalian retinas, much less is known about their physiology. We describe new techniques and approaches which are helping to provide a better understanding of cone function. We focus on several outstanding issues, including the identification of the features of the phototransduction cascade that are responsible for the more rapid kinetics and decreased sensitivity of the cone response, the roles of inner-segment voltage-gated and Ca2+-activated channels, the means by which cones remain responsive even in the brightest illumination, mechanisms of cone visual pigment regeneration in constant light, and energy consumption of cones in comparison to that of rods.
Collapse
|
11
|
Fortenbach C, Peinado Allina G, Shores CM, Karlen SJ, Miller EB, Bishop H, Trimmer JS, Burns ME, Pugh EN. Loss of the K+ channel Kv2.1 greatly reduces outward dark current and causes ionic dysregulation and degeneration in rod photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 2021; 153:211728. [PMID: 33502442 PMCID: PMC7845921 DOI: 10.1085/jgp.202012687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Vertebrate retinal photoreceptors signal light by suppressing a circulating “dark current” that maintains their relative depolarization in the dark. This dark current is composed of an inward current through CNG channels and NCKX transporters in the outer segment that is balanced by outward current exiting principally from the inner segment. It has been hypothesized that Kv2.1 channels carry a predominant fraction of the outward current in rods. We examined this hypothesis by comparing whole cell, suction electrode, and electroretinographic recordings from Kv2.1 knockout (Kv2.1−/−) and wild-type (WT) mouse rods. Single cell recordings revealed flash responses with unusual kinetics, and reduced dark currents that were quantitatively consistent with the measured depolarization of the membrane resting potential in the dark. A two-compartment (outer and inner segment) physiological model based on known ionic mechanisms revealed that the abnormal Kv2.1−/− rod photoresponses arise principally from the voltage dependencies of the known conductances and the NCKX exchanger, and a highly elevated fraction of inward current carried by Ca2+ through CNG channels due to the aberrant depolarization. Kv2.1−/− rods had shorter outer segments than WT and dysmorphic mitochondria in their inner segments. Optical coherence tomography of knockout animals demonstrated a slow photoreceptor degeneration over a period of 6 mo. Overall, these findings reveal that Kv2.1 channels carry 70–80% of the non-NKX outward dark current of the mouse rod, and that the depolarization caused by the loss of Kv2.1 results in elevated Ca2+ influx through CNG channels and elevated free intracellular Ca2+, leading to progressive degeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Camilla M Shores
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Sarah J Karlen
- Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Eric B Miller
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Hannah Bishop
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.,Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - James S Trimmer
- Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.,Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Marie E Burns
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.,Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.,Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Edward N Pugh
- Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.,Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.,Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Biological Role of Arrestin-1 Oligomerization. J Neurosci 2020; 40:8055-8069. [PMID: 32948676 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0749-20.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Members of the arrestin superfamily have great propensity of self-association, but the physiological significance of this phenomenon is unclear. To determine the biological role of visual arrestin-1 oligomerization in rod photoreceptors, we expressed mutant arrestin-1 with severely impaired self-association in mouse rods and analyzed mice of both sexes. We show that the oligomerization-deficient mutant is capable of quenching rhodopsin signaling normally, as judged by electroretinography and single-cell recording. Like wild type, mutant arrestin-1 is largely excluded from the outer segments in the dark, proving that the normal intracellular localization is not due the size exclusion of arrestin-1 oligomers. In contrast to wild type, supraphysiological expression of the mutant causes shortening of the outer segments and photoreceptor death. Thus, oligomerization reduces the cytotoxicity of arrestin-1 monomer, ensuring long-term photoreceptor survival.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Visual arrestin-1 forms dimers and tetramers. The biological role of its oligomerization is unclear. To test the role of arrestin-1 self-association, we expressed oligomerization-deficient mutant in arrestin-1 knock-out mice. The mutant quenches light-induced rhodopsin signaling like wild type, demonstrating that in vivo monomeric arrestin-1 is necessary and sufficient for this function. In rods, arrestin-1 moves from the inner segments and cell bodies in the dark to the outer segments in the light. Nonoligomerizing mutant undergoes the same translocation, demonstrating that the size of the oligomers is not the reason for arrestin-1 exclusion from the outer segments in the dark. High expression of oligomerization-deficient arrestin-1 resulted in rod death. Thus, oligomerization reduces the cytotoxicity of high levels of arrestin-1 monomer.
Collapse
|
13
|
Reingruber J, Ingram NT, Griffis KG, Fain GL. A kinetic analysis of mouse rod and cone photoreceptor responses. J Physiol 2020; 598:3747-3763. [PMID: 32557629 PMCID: PMC7484371 DOI: 10.1113/jp279524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
KEY POINTS Most vertebrate eyes have rods for dim-light vision and cones for brighter light and higher temporal sensitivity. Rods evolved from cone-like precursors through expression of different transduction genes or the same genes at different expression levels, but we do not know which molecular differences were most important. We approached this problem by analysing rod and cone responses with the same model but with different values for model parameters. We showed that, in addition to outer-segment volume, the most important differences between rods and cones are: (1) decreased transduction gain, reflecting smaller amplification in the G-protein cascade; (2) a faster rate of turnover of the second messenger cGMP in darkness; and (3) an accelerated rate of decay of the effector enzyme phosphodiesterase and perhaps also of activated visual pigment. We believe our analysis has identified the principal alterations during evolution responsible for the duplex retina. ABSTRACT Most vertebrates have rod and cone photoreceptors, which differ in their sensitivity and response kinetics. We know that rods evolved from cone-like precursors through the expression of different transduction genes or the same genes at different levels, but we do not know which molecular differences were most important. We have approached this problem in mouse retina by analysing the kinetic differences between rod flash responses and recent voltage-clamp recordings of cone flash responses, using a model incorporating the principal features of photoreceptor transduction. We apply a novel method of analysis using the log-transform of the current, and we ask which of the model's dynamic parameters need be changed to transform the flash response of a rod into that of a cone. The most important changes are a decrease in the gain of the response, reflecting a reduction in amplification of the transduction cascade; an increase in the rate of turnover of cGMP in darkness; and an increase in the rate of decay of activated phosphodiesterase, with perhaps also an increase in the rate of decay of light-activated visual pigment. Although we cannot exclude other differences, and in particular alterations in the Ca2+ economy of the photoreceptors, we believe that we have identified the kinetic parameters principally responsible for the differences in the flash responses of the two kinds of photoreceptors, which were likely during evolution to have resulted in the duplex retina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Reingruber
- Institut de Biologie de l’École Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Norianne T. Ingram
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095–7239, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095–7000, USA
| | - Khris G. Griffis
- Department of Ophthalmology and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095–7000, USA
| | - Gordon L. Fain
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095–7239, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095–7000, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Challenges in Analysis of Hydrophilic Metabolites Using Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry. JOURNAL OF ANALYSIS AND TESTING 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s41664-020-00126-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
15
|
Local, nonlinear effects of cGMP and Ca2+ reduce single photon response variability in retinal rods. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225948. [PMID: 31805112 PMCID: PMC6894879 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The single photon response (SPR) in vertebrate photoreceptors is inherently variable due to several stochastic events in the phototransduction cascade, the main one being the shutoff of photoactivated rhodopsin. Deactivation is driven by a random number of steps, each of random duration with final quenching occurring after a random delay. Nevertheless, variability of the SPR is relatively low, making the signal highly reliable. Several biophysical and mathematical mechanisms contributing to variability suppression have been examined by the authors. Here we investigate the contribution of local depletion of cGMP by PDE*, the non linear dependence of the photocurrent on cGMP, Ca2+ feedback by making use of a fully space resolved (FSR) mathematical model, applied to two species (mouse and salamander), by varying the cGMP diffusion rate severalfold and rod outer segment diameter by an order of magnitude, and by introducing new, more refined, and time dependent variability functionals. Globally well stirred (GWS) models, and to a lesser extent transversally well stirred models (TWS), underestimate the role of nonlinearities and local cGMP depletion in quenching the variability of the circulating current with respect to fully space resolved models (FSR). These distortions minimize the true extent to which SPR is stabilized by locality in cGMP depletion, nonlinear effects linking cGMP to current, and Ca2+ feedback arising from the physical separation of E* from the ion channels located on the outer shell, and the diffusion of these second messengers in the cytoplasm.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lamb TD, Heck M, Kraft TW. Implications of dimeric activation of PDE6 for rod phototransduction. Open Biol 2019; 8:rsob.180076. [PMID: 30068567 PMCID: PMC6119862 DOI: 10.1098/rsob.180076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
We examine the implications of a recent report providing evidence that two transducins must bind to the rod phosphodiesterase to elicit significant hydrolytic activity. To predict the rod photoreceptor's electrical response, we use numerical simulation of the two-dimensional diffusional contact of interacting molecules at the surface of the disc membrane, and then we use the simulated PDE activity as the driving function for the downstream reaction cascade. The results account for a number of aspects of rod phototransduction that have previously been puzzling. For example, they explain the existence of a greater initial delay in rods than in cones. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that the 'continuous' noise recorded in rods in darkness is likely to arise from spontaneous activation of individual molecules of PDE at a rate of a few tens per second per rod, probably as a consequence of spontaneous activation of transducins at a rate of thousands per second per rod. Hence, the dimeric activation of PDE in rods provides immunity against spontaneous transducin activation, thereby reducing the continuous noise. Our analysis also provides a coherent quantitative explanation of the amplification underlying the single photon response. Overall, numerical analysis of the dimeric activation of PDE places rod phototransduction in a new light.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor D Lamb
- Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory 2600, Australia
| | - Martin Heck
- Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik der Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Timothy W Kraft
- Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling is crucial for many physiological processes. A signature of such pathways is high amplification, a concept originating from retinal rod phototransduction, whereby one photoactivated rhodopsin molecule (Rho*) was long reported to activate several hundred transducins (GT*s), each then activating a cGMP-phosphodiesterase catalytic subunit (GT*·PDE*). This high gain at the Rho*-to-GT* step has been challenged more recently, but estimates remain dispersed and rely on some nonintact rod measurements. With two independent approaches, one with an extremely inefficient mutant rhodopsin and the other with WT bleached rhodopsin, which has exceedingly weak constitutive activity in darkness, we obtained an estimate for the electrical effect from a single GT*·PDE* molecular complex in intact mouse rods. Comparing the single-GT*·PDE* effect to the WT single-photon response, both in Gcaps-/- background, gives an effective gain of only ∼12-14 GT*·PDE*s produced per Rho*. Our findings have finally dispelled the entrenched concept of very high gain at the receptor-to-G protein/effector step in GPCR systems.
Collapse
|
18
|
Determination of basal phosphodiesterase activity in mouse rod photoreceptors with cGMP clamp. Sci Rep 2019; 9:1183. [PMID: 30718640 PMCID: PMC6362171 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37661-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Light regulates cGMP concentration in the photoreceptor cytoplasm by activating phosphodiesterase (PDE) molecules through a G-protein signalling cascade. Spontaneous PDE activity is present in rod outer segments even in darkness. This basal PDE activity (βdark) has not been determined in wild type mammalian photoreceptor cells although it plays a key role in setting the sensitivity and recovery kinetics of rod responses. We present a novel method for determination of βdark using local electroretinography (LERG) from isolated mouse retinas. The method is based on the ability of PDE inhibitors to decrease βdark, which can be counterbalanced by increasing PDE activity with light. This procedure clamps cytoplasmic cGMP to its dark value. βdark can be calculated based on the amount of light needed for the "cGMP clamp" and information extracted from the registered rod photoresponses. Here we apply this method to determine βdark values for the first time in the mammalian rods and obtain the following estimates for different mouse models: 3.9 s-1 for wild type, 4.5 s-1 for guanylate cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs) knockout, and 4.4 s-1 for GCAPs and recoverin double knockout mice. Our results suggest that depletion of GCAPs or recoverin do not affect βdark.
Collapse
|
19
|
Field GD, Uzzell V, Chichilnisky EJ, Rieke F. Temporal resolution of single-photon responses in primate rod photoreceptors and limits imposed by cellular noise. J Neurophysiol 2018; 121:255-268. [PMID: 30485153 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00683.2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Sensory receptor noise corrupts sensory signals, contributing to imperfect perception and dictating central processing strategies. For example, noise in rod phototransduction limits our ability to detect light, and minimizing the impact of this noise requires precisely tuned nonlinear processing by the retina. But detection sensitivity is only one aspect of night vision: prompt and accurate behavior also requires that rods reliably encode the timing of photon arrivals. We show here that the temporal resolution of responses of primate rods is much finer than the duration of the light response and identify the key limiting sources of transduction noise. We also find that the thermal activation rate of rhodopsin is lower than previous estimates, implying that other noise sources are more important than previously appreciated. A model of rod single-photon responses reveals that the limiting noise relevant for behavior depends critically on how rod signals are pooled by downstream neurons. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Many studies have focused on the visual system's ability to detect photons, but not on its ability to encode the relative timing of detected photons. Timing is essential for computations such as determining the velocity of moving objects. Here we examine the timing precision of primate rod photoreceptor responses and show that it is more precise than previously appreciated. This motivates an evaluation of whether scotopic vision approaches limits imposed by rod temporal resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg D Field
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine , Durham, North Carolina
| | - Valerie Uzzell
- Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, Salk Institute for Biological Studies , La Jolla, California
| | - E J Chichilnisky
- Stanford University, Departments of Neurosurgery and Ophthalmology , Stanford, California
| | - Fred Rieke
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morshedian A, Woodruff ML, Fain GL. Role of recoverin in rod photoreceptor light adaptation. J Physiol 2018; 596:1513-1526. [PMID: 29435986 DOI: 10.1113/jp275779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
KEY POINTS Recoverin is a small molecular-weight, calcium-binding protein in rod outer segments that can modulate the rate of rhodopsin phosphorylation. We describe two additional and perhaps more important functions during photoreceptor light adaptation. Recoverin influences the rate of change of adaptation. In wild-type rods, sensitivity and response integration time adapt with similar time constants of 150-200 ms. In Rv-/- rods lacking recoverin, sensitivity declines faster and integration time is already shorter and not significantly altered. During steady light exposure, rod circulating current slowly increases during a time course of tens of seconds, gradually extending the operating range of the rod. In Rv-/- rods, this mechanism is deleted, steady-state currents are already larger and rods saturate at brighter intensities. We propose that recoverin modulates spontaneous and light-activated phophodiesterase-6, the phototransduction effector enzyme, to increase sensitivity in dim light but improve responsiveness to change in brighter illumination. ABSTRACT Recoverin is a small molecular-weight, calcium-binding protein in rod outer segments that binds to G-protein receptor kinase 1 and can alter the rate of rhodopsin phosphorylation. A change in phosphorylation should change the lifetime of light-activated rhodopsin and the gain of phototransduction, but deletion of recoverin has little effect on the sensitivity of rods either in the dark or in dim-to-moderate background light. We describe two additional functions perhaps of greater physiological significance. (i) When the ambient intensity increases, sensitivity and integration time decrease in wild-type (WT) rods with similar time constants of 150-200 ms. Recoverin is part of the mechanism controlling this process because, in Rv-/- rods lacking recoverin, sensitivity declines more rapidly and integration time is already shorter and not further altered. (ii) During steady light exposure, WT rod circulating current slowly increases during a time course of tens of seconds, gradually extending the operating range of the rod. In Rv-/- rods, this mechanism is also deleted, steady-state currents are already larger and rods saturate at brighter intensities. We argue that neither (i) nor (ii) can be caused by modulation of rhodopsin phosphorylation but may instead be produced by direct modulation of phophodiesterase-6 (PDE6), the phototransduction effector enzyme. We propose that recoverin in dark-adapted rods keeps the integration time long and the spontaneous PDE6 rate relatively high to improve sensitivity. In background light, the integration time is decreased to facilitate detection of change and motion and the spontaneous PDE6 rate decreases to augment the rod working range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala Morshedian
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael L Woodruff
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gordon L Fain
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
A retrospective on the scientific importance and impact of Hecht, Shlaer, and Pirenne’s classic 1942 paper, “Energy, Quanta, and Vision.” Vertebrate rod photoreceptors evolved the astonishing ability to respond reliably to single photons. In parallel, the proximate neurons of the visual system evolved the ability to reliably encode information from a few single-photon responses (SPRs) as arising from the presence of an object of interest in the visual environment. These amazing capabilities were first inferred from measurements of human visual threshold by Hecht et al. (1942), whose paper has since been cited over 1,000 times. Subsequent research, in part inspired by Hecht et al.’s discovery, has directly measured rod SPRs, characterized the molecular mechanism responsible for their generation, and uncovered much about the specializations in the retina that enable the reliable transmission of SPRs in the teeth of intrinsic neuronal noise.
Collapse
|
22
|
Field GD, Sampath AP. Behavioural and physiological limits to vision in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2017; 372:rstb.2016.0072. [PMID: 28193817 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Human vision is exquisitely sensitive-a dark-adapted observer is capable of reliably detecting the absorption of a few quanta of light. Such sensitivity requires that the sensory receptors of the retina, rod photoreceptors, generate a reliable signal when single photons are absorbed. In addition, the retina must be able to extract this information and relay it to higher visual centres under conditions where very few rods signal single-photon responses while the majority generate only noise. Critical to signal transmission are mechanistic optimizations within rods and their dedicated retinal circuits that enhance the discriminability of single-photon responses by mitigating photoreceptor and synaptic noise. We describe behavioural experiments over the past century that have led to the appreciation of high sensitivity near absolute visual threshold. We further consider mechanisms within rod photoreceptors and dedicated rod circuits that act to extract single-photon responses from cellular noise. We highlight how these studies have shaped our understanding of brain function and point out several unresolved questions in the processing of light near the visual threshold.This article is part of the themed issue 'Vision in dim light'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg D Field
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Alapakkam P Sampath
- Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Morshedian A, Fain GL. The evolution of rod photoreceptors. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2017; 372:rstb.2016.0074. [PMID: 28193819 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Photoreceptors in animals are generally of two kinds: the ciliary or c-type and the rhabdomeric or r-type. Although ciliary photoreceptors are found in many phyla, vertebrates seem to be unique in having two distinct kinds which together span the entire range of vision, from single photons to bright light. We ask why the principal photoreceptors of vertebrates are ciliary and not rhabdomeric, and how rods evolved from less sensitive cone-like photoreceptors to produce our duplex retina. We suggest that the principal advantage of vertebrate ciliary receptors is that they use less ATP than rhabdomeric photoreceptors. This difference may have provided sufficient selection pressure for the development of a completely ciliary eye. Although many of the details of rod evolution are still uncertain, present evidence indicates that (i) rods evolved very early before the split between the jawed and jawless vertebrates, (ii) outer-segment discs make no contribution to rod sensitivity but may have evolved to increase the efficiency of protein renewal, and (iii) evolution of the rod was incremental and multifaceted, produced by the formation of several novel protein isoforms and by changes in protein expression, with no one alteration having more than a few-fold effect on transduction activation or inactivation.This article is part of the themed issue 'Vision in dim light'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala Morshedian
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA
| | - Gordon L Fain
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA .,Department of Ophthalmology and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7000, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Fertilization is exceptionally complex and, depending on the species, happens in entirely different environments. External fertilizers in aquatic habitats, like marine invertebrates or fish, release their gametes into the seawater or freshwater, whereas sperm from most internal fertilizers like mammals cross the female genital tract to make their way to the egg. Various chemical and physical cues guide sperm to the egg. Quite generally, these cues enable signaling pathways that ultimately evoke a cellular Ca2+ response that modulates the waveform of the flagellar beat and, hence, the swimming path. To cope with the panoply of challenges to reach and fertilize the egg, sperm from different species have developed their own unique repertoire of signaling molecules and mechanisms. Here, we review the differences and commonalities for sperm sensory signaling in marine invertebrates (sea urchin), fish (zebrafish), and mammals (mouse, human).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagmar Wachten
- Minerva Max Planck Research Group, Molecular Physiology, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan F Jikeli
- Minerva Max Planck Research Group, Molecular Physiology, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - U Benjamin Kaupp
- Department Molecular Sensory Systems, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), 53175 Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Peinado Allina G, Fortenbach C, Naarendorp F, Gross OP, Pugh EN, Burns ME. Bright flash response recovery of mammalian rods in vivo is rate limited by RGS9. J Gen Physiol 2017; 149:443-454. [PMID: 28302678 PMCID: PMC5379920 DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201611692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Peinado Allina et al. measure rod responses in living mice across a wide range of flash strengths and find that responses are much faster in vivo than ex vivo, though the biochemical mechanisms underlying the kinetics appear to be the same in both cases. Although RGS9 overexpression sped recovery from bright flashes, faster rod recovery did not improve the temporal resolution of scotopic vision. The temporal resolution of scotopic vision is thought to be constrained by the signaling kinetics of retinal rods, which use a highly amplified G-protein cascade to transduce absorbed photons into changes in membrane potential. Much is known about the biochemical mechanisms that determine the kinetics of rod responses ex vivo, but the rate-limiting mechanisms in vivo are unknown. Using paired flash electroretinograms with improved signal-to-noise, we have recorded the amplitude and kinetics of rod responses to a wide range of flash strengths from living mice. Bright rod responses in vivo recovered nearly twice as fast as all previous recordings, although the kinetic consequences of genetic perturbations previously studied ex vivo were qualitatively similar. In vivo, the dominant time constant of recovery from bright flashes was dramatically reduced by overexpression of the RGS9 complex, revealing G-protein deactivation to be rate limiting for recovery. However, unlike previous ex vivo recordings, dim flash responses in vivo were relatively unaffected by RGS9 overexpression, suggesting that other mechanisms, such as calcium feedback dynamics that are strongly regulated by the restricted subretinal microenvironment, act to determine rod dim flash kinetics. To assess the consequences for scotopic vision, we used a nocturnal wheel-running assay to measure the ability of wild-type and RGS9-overexpressing mice to detect dim flickering stimuli and found no improvement when rod recovery was speeded by RGS9 overexpression. These results are important for understanding retinal circuitry, in particular as modeled in the large literature that addresses the relationship between the kinetics and sensitivity of retinal responses and visual perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Owen P Gross
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95618
| | - Edward N Pugh
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95618.,Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95618.,Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95618
| | - Marie E Burns
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95618 .,Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95618.,Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95618
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vinberg F, Turunen TT, Heikkinen H, Pitkänen M, Koskelainen A. A novel Ca2+-feedback mechanism extends the operating range of mammalian rods to brighter light. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 146:307-21. [PMID: 26415569 PMCID: PMC4586592 DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201511412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
A previously unidentified calcium-dependent mechanism contributes to light adaptation in mammalian rods. Sensory cells adjust their sensitivity to incoming signals, such as odor or light, in response to changes in background stimulation, thereby extending the range over which they operate. For instance, rod photoreceptors are extremely sensitive in darkness, so that they are able to detect individual photons, but remain responsive to visual stimuli under conditions of bright ambient light, which would be expected to saturate their response given the high gain of the rod transduction cascade in darkness. These photoreceptors regulate their sensitivity to light rapidly and reversibly in response to changes in ambient illumination, thereby avoiding saturation. Calcium ions (Ca2+) play a major role in mediating the rapid, subsecond adaptation to light, and the Ca2+-binding proteins GCAP1 and GCAP2 (or guanylyl cyclase–activating proteins [GCAPs]) have been identified as important mediators of the photoreceptor response to changes in intracellular Ca2+. However, mouse rods lacking both GCAP1 and GCAP2 (GCAP−/−) still show substantial light adaptation. Here, we determined the Ca2+ dependency of this residual light adaptation and, by combining pharmacological, genetic, and electrophysiological tools, showed that an unknown Ca2+-dependent mechanism contributes to light adaptation in GCAP−/− mouse rods. We found that mimicking the light-induced decrease in intracellular [Ca2+] accelerated recovery of the response to visual stimuli and caused a fourfold decrease of sensitivity in GCAP−/− rods. About half of this Ca2+-dependent regulation of sensitivity could be attributed to the recoverin-mediated pathway, whereas half of it was caused by the unknown mechanism. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that the feedback mechanisms regulating the sensitivity of mammalian rods on the second and subsecond time scales are all Ca2+ dependent and that, unlike salamander rods, Ca2+-independent background-induced acceleration of flash response kinetics is rather weak in mouse rods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frans Vinberg
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Teemu T Turunen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
| | - Hanna Heikkinen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
| | - Marja Pitkänen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
| | - Ari Koskelainen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ingram NT, Sampath AP, Fain GL. Why are rods more sensitive than cones? J Physiol 2016; 594:5415-26. [PMID: 27218707 DOI: 10.1113/jp272556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
One hundred and fifty years ago Max Schultze first proposed the duplex theory of vision, that vertebrate eyes have two types of photoreceptor cells with differing sensitivity: rods for dim light and cones for bright light and colour detection. We now know that this division is fundamental not only to the photoreceptors themselves but to the whole of retinal and visual processing. But why are rods more sensitive, and how did the duplex retina first evolve? Cells resembling cones are very old, first appearing among cnidarians; the emergence of rods was a key step in the evolution of the vertebrate eye. Many transduction proteins have different isoforms in rods and cones, and others are expressed at different levels. Moreover rods and cones have a different anatomy, with only rods containing membranous discs enclosed by the plasma membrane. These differences must be responsible for the difference in absolute sensitivity, but which are essential? Recent research particularly expressing cone proteins in rods or changing the level of expression seem to show that many of the molecular differences in the activation and decay of the response may have each made a small contribution as evolution proceeded stepwise with incremental increases in sensitivity. Rod outer-segment discs were not essential and developed after single-photon detection. These experiments collectively provide a new understanding of the two kinds of photoreceptors and help to explain how gene duplication and the formation of rod-specific proteins produced the duplex retina, which has remained remarkably constant in physiology from amphibians to man.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norianne T Ingram
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7239, USA
| | - Alapakkam P Sampath
- Department of Ophthalmology and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7000, USA
| | - Gordon L Fain
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7239, USA. .,Department of Ophthalmology and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7000, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Marciano DC, Lua RC, Herman C, Lichtarge O. Cooperativity of Negative Autoregulation Confers Increased Mutational Robustness. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2016; 116:258104. [PMID: 27391757 PMCID: PMC5152588 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.258104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Negative autoregulation is universally found across organisms. In the bacterium Escherichia coli, transcription factors often repress their own expression to form a negative feedback network motif that enables robustness to changes in biochemical parameters. Here we present a simple phenomenological model of a negative feedback transcription factor repressing both itself and another target gene. The strength of the negative feedback is characterized by three parameters: the cooperativity in self-repression, the maximal expression rate of the transcription factor, and the apparent dissociation constant of the transcription factor binding to its own promoter. Analysis of the model shows that the target gene levels are robust to mutations in the transcription factor, and that the robustness improves as the degree of cooperativity in self-repression increases. The prediction is tested in the LexA transcriptional network of E. coli by altering cooperativity in self-repression and promoter strength. Indeed, we find robustness is correlated with the former. Considering the proposed importance of gene regulation in speciation, parameters governing a transcription factor's robustness to mutation may have significant influence on a cell or organism's capacity to evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C. Marciano
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Rhonald C. Lua
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Christophe Herman
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Olivier Lichtarge
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
- Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
- Computational and Integrative Biomedical Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lamb TD, Kraft TW. Quantitative modeling of the molecular steps underlying shut-off of rhodopsin activity in rod phototransduction. Mol Vis 2016; 22:674-96. [PMID: 27375353 PMCID: PMC4920504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the predictions of alternative models for the stochastic shut-off of activated rhodopsin (R*) and their implications for the interpretation of experimentally recorded single-photon responses (SPRs) in mammalian rods. THEORY We analyze the transitions that an activated R* molecule undergoes as a result of successive phosphorylation steps and arrestin binding. We consider certain simplifying cases for the relative magnitudes of the reaction rate constants and derive the probability distributions for the time to arrestin binding. In addition to the conventional model in which R* catalytic activity declines in a graded manner with successive phosphorylations, we analyze two cases in which the activity is assumed to occur not via multiple small steps upon each phosphorylation but via a single large step. We refer to these latter two cases as the binary R* shut-off and three-state R* shut-off models. METHODS We simulate R*'s stochastic reactions numerically for the three models. In the simplifying cases for the ratio of rate constants in the binary and three-state models, we show that the probability distribution of the time to arrestin binding is accurately predicted. To simulate SPRs, we then integrate the differential equations for the downstream reactions using a standard model of the rod outer segment that includes longitudinal diffusion of cGMP and Ca(2+). RESULTS Our simulations of SPRs in the conventional model of graded shut-off of R* conform closely to the simulations in a recent study. However, the gain factor required to account for the observed mean SPR amplitude is higher than can be accounted for from biochemical experiments. In addition, a substantial minority of the simulated SPRs exhibit features that have not been reported in published experiments. Our simulations of SPRs using the model of binary R* shut-off appear to conform closely to experimental results for wild type (WT) mouse rods, and the required gain factor conforms to biochemical expectations. However, for the arrestin knockout (Arr(-/-)) phenotype, the predictions deviated from experimental findings and led us to invoke a low-activity state that R* enters before arrestin binding. Our simulations of this three-state R* shut-off model are very similar to those of the binary model in the WT case but are preferred because they appear to accurately predict the mean SPRs for four mutant phenotypes, Arr(+/-), Arr(-/-), GRK1(+/-), and GRK1(-/-), in addition to the WT phenotype. When we additionally treated the formation and shut-off of activated phosphodiesterase (E*) as stochastic, the simulated SPRs appeared even more similar to real SPRs, and there was very little change in the ensemble mean and standard deviation or in the amplitude distribution. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that the conventional model of graded reduction in R* activity through successive phosphorylation steps appears to be inconsistent with experimental results. Instead, we find that two variants of a model in which R* activity initially remains high and then declines abruptly after several phosphorylation steps appears capable of providing a better description of experimentally measured SPRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor D. Lamb
- Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research,
The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Timothy W. Kraft
- Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reingruber J, Holcman D, Fain GL. How rods respond to single photons: Key adaptations of a G-protein cascade that enable vision at the physical limit of perception. Bioessays 2015; 37:1243-52. [PMID: 26354340 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201500081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Rod photoreceptors are among the most sensitive light detectors in nature. They achieve their remarkable sensitivity across a wide variety of species through a number of essential adaptations: a specialized cellular geometry, a G-protein cascade with an unusually stable receptor molecule, a low-noise transduction mechanism, a nearly perfect effector enzyme, and highly evolved mechanisms of feedback control and receptor deactivation. Practically any change in protein expression, enzyme activity, or feedback control can be shown to impair photon detection, either by decreasing sensitivity or signal-to-noise ratio, or by reducing temporal resolution. Comparison of mammals to amphibians suggests that rod outer-segment morphology and the molecules and mechanism of transduction may have evolved together to optimize light sensitivity in darkness, which culminates in the extraordinary ability of these cells to respond to single photons at the ultimate limit of visual perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Reingruber
- IBENS, Group of Computational Biology and Applied Mathematics, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.,INSERM U1024, Paris, France
| | - David Holcman
- IBENS, Group of Computational Biology and Applied Mathematics, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.,Department of Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gordon L Fain
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Terasaki Life Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
The phototransduction machinery in the rod outer segment has a strong efficacy gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:E2715-24. [PMID: 25941368 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423162112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Rod photoreceptors consist of an outer segment (OS) and an inner segment. Inside the OS a biochemical machinery transforms the rhodopsin photoisomerization into electrical signal. This machinery has been treated as and is thought to be homogenous with marginal inhomogeneities. To verify this assumption, we developed a methodology based on special tapered optical fibers (TOFs) to deliver highly localized light stimulations. By using these TOFs, specific regions of the rod OS could be stimulated with spots of light highly confined in space. As the TOF is moved from the OS base toward its tip, the amplitude of saturating and single photon responses decreases, demonstrating that the efficacy of the transduction machinery is not uniform and is 5-10 times higher at the base than at the tip. This gradient of efficacy of the transduction machinery is attributed to a progressive depletion of the phosphodiesterase along the rod OS. Moreover we demonstrate that, using restricted spots of light, the duration of the photoresponse along the OS does not increase linearly with the light intensity as with diffuse light.
Collapse
|
32
|
Azevedo AW, Doan T, Moaven H, Sokal I, Baameur F, Vishnivetskiy SA, Homan KT, Tesmer JJG, Gurevich VV, Chen J, Rieke F. C-terminal threonines and serines play distinct roles in the desensitization of rhodopsin, a G protein-coupled receptor. eLife 2015; 4. [PMID: 25910054 PMCID: PMC4438306 DOI: 10.7554/elife.05981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Rod photoreceptors generate measurable responses to single-photon activation of individual molecules of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), rhodopsin. Timely rhodopsin desensitization depends on phosphorylation and arrestin binding, which quenches G protein activation. Rhodopsin phosphorylation has been measured biochemically at C-terminal serine residues, suggesting that these residues are critical for producing fast, low-noise responses. The role of native threonine residues is unclear. We compared single-photon responses from rhodopsin lacking native serine or threonine phosphorylation sites. Contrary to expectation, serine-only rhodopsin generated prolonged step-like single-photon responses that terminated abruptly and randomly, whereas threonine-only rhodopsin generated responses that were only modestly slower than normal. We show that the step-like responses of serine-only rhodopsin reflect slow and stochastic arrestin binding. Thus, threonine sites play a privileged role in promoting timely arrestin binding and rhodopsin desensitization. Similar coordination of phosphorylation and arrestin binding may more generally permit tight control of the duration of GPCR activity. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05981.001 ‘Rod’ cells in the eye enable us to see in starlight. Inside these cells, a protein called rhodopsin is activated by light, which leads to an electrical signal being produced that travels to the brain. The duration of the electrical signal depends on the time it takes for the rhodopsin to be deactivated. Rhodopsin is a member of a large class of receptor proteins known as G protein-coupled receptors that regulate many processes throughout the body. Previous studies have shown that rhodopsin is deactivated by the attachment of phosphate groups to the protein. This allows another protein called arrestin to bind to rhodopsin. The phosphates can be attached to particular amino acids—the building blocks of proteins—at one end of rhodopsin. Three of these are a type of amino acid called serine. Previous work has shown that light increases the speed at which phosphate groups are added to these serines, suggesting that they are important for producing rapid electrical signals. The other three amino acids are of a different type—called threonine—but it is less clear what role they play in deactivating rhodopsin. Here, Azevedo et al. studied mutant forms of rhodopsin that were missing the serines or threonines in mice. The experiments show that loss of the serines only slightly slowed the electrical signals. However, loss of the threonines resulted in much slower electrical signals that ended at random times. This was due to rhodopsin being less able to bind to arrestin. Azevedo et al. propose a new model for how rhodopsin is deactivated. Once light activates the protein, phosphate groups are rapidly added to the serines, which begins to lower the activity of rhodopsin. However, it is the slower addition of phosphates to the threonines that is essential to promote arrestin binding and fully deactivate the protein. Other proteins belonging to the G protein-coupled receptor family also have these serines and threonines, and thus, may be regulated in a similar way. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05981.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony W Azevedo
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| | - Thuy Doan
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| | - Hormoz Moaven
- Departments of Cell & Neurobiology and Ophthalmology, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Iza Sokal
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| | - Faiza Baameur
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, United States
| | - Sergey A Vishnivetskiy
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, United States
| | - Kristoff T Homan
- Life Sciences Institute, Departments of Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
| | - John J G Tesmer
- Life Sciences Institute, Departments of Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
| | - Vsevolod V Gurevich
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, United States
| | - Jeannie Chen
- Departments of Cell & Neurobiology and Ophthalmology, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Fred Rieke
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Strünker T, Alvarez L, Kaupp UB. At the physical limit - chemosensation in sperm. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2015; 34:110-6. [PMID: 25768273 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2015] [Revised: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Many cells probe their environment for chemical cues. Some cells respond to picomolar concentrations of neuropeptides, hormones, pheromones, or chemoattractants. At such low concentrations, cells encounter only a few molecules. The mechanistic underpinnings of single-molecule sensitivity are not known for any eukaryotic cell. Sea urchin sperm offer a unique model to unveil in quantitative terms the principles underlying chemosensation at the physical limit. Here, we discuss the mechanisms of such exquisite sensitivity and the computational operations performed by sperm during chemotactic steering. Moreover, we highlight commonalities and differences between signalling in sperm and photoreceptors and among sperm from different species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Strünker
- Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, Bonn 53175, Germany
| | - L Alvarez
- Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, Bonn 53175, Germany
| | - U B Kaupp
- Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, Bonn 53175, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling. Mol Vis 2015; 21:244-63. [PMID: 25866462 PMCID: PMC4392649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To experimentally identify and quantify factors responsible for the lower sensitivity of retinal cones compared to rods. METHODS Electrical responses of frog rods and fish (Carassius) cones to short flashes of light were recorded using the suction pipette technique. A fast solution changer was used to apply a solution that fixed intracellular Ca2+ concentration at the prestimulus level, thereby disabling Ca2+ feedback, to the outer segment (OS). The results were analyzed with a specially designed mathematical model of phototransduction. The model included all basic processes of activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade but omitted unnecessary mechanistic details of each step. RESULTS Judging from the response versus intensity curves, Carassius cones were two to three orders of magnitude less sensitive than frog rods. There was a large scatter in sensitivity among individual cones, with red-sensitive cones being on average approximately two times less sensitive than green-sensitive ones. The scatter was mostly due to different signal amplification, since the kinetic parameters of the responses among cones were far less variable than sensitivity. We argue that the generally accepted definition of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction cannot be used for comparing amplification in rods and cones, since it depends on an irrelevant factor, that is, the cell's volume. We also show that the routinely used simplified parabolic curve fitting to an initial phase of the response leads to a few-fold underestimate of the amplification. We suggest a new definition of the amplification that only includes molecular parameters of the cascade activation, and show how it can be derived from experimental data. We found that the mathematical model with unrestrained parameters can yield an excellent fit to experimental responses. However, the fits with wildly different sets of parameters can be virtually indistinguishable, and therefore cannot provide meaningful data on underlying mechanisms. Based on results of Ca2+-clamp experiments, we developed an approach to strongly constrain the values of many key parameters that set the time course and sensitivity of the photoresponse (such as the dark turnover rate of cGMP, rates of turnoffs of the photoactivated visual pigment and phosphodiesterase, and kinetics of Ca2+ feedback). We show that applying these constraints to our mathematical model enables accurate determination of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction. It appeared that, contrary to many suggestions, maximum biochemical amplification derived for "best" Carassius cones was as high as in frog rods. On the other hand, all turnoff and recovery reactions in cones proceeded approximately 10 times faster than in rods. CONCLUSIONS The main cause of the differing sensitivity of rods and cones is cones' ability to terminate their photoresponse faster.
Collapse
|
35
|
Gross OP, Pugh EN, Burns ME. cGMP in mouse rods: the spatiotemporal dynamics underlying single photon responses. Front Mol Neurosci 2015; 8:6. [PMID: 25788876 PMCID: PMC4349151 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2015.00006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Vertebrate vision begins when retinal photoreceptors transduce photons into electrical signals that are then relayed to other neurons in the eye, and ultimately to the brain. In rod photoreceptors, transduction of single photons is achieved by a well-understood G-protein cascade that modulates cGMP levels, and in turn, cGMP-sensitive inward current. The spatial extent and depth of the decline in cGMP during the single photon response (SPR) have been major issues in phototransduction research since the discovery that single photons elicit substantial and reproducible changes in membrane current. The spatial profile of cGMP decline during the SPR affects signal gain, and thus may contribute to reduction of trial-to-trial fluctuations in the SPR. Here we summarize the general principles of rod phototransduction, emphasizing recent advances in resolving the spatiotemporal dynamics of cGMP during the SPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen P Gross
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis Davis, CA, USA
| | - Edward N Pugh
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Davis, CA, USA ; Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis Davis, CA, USA ; Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California Davis Davis, CA, USA
| | - Marie E Burns
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis Davis, CA, USA ; Departments of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis Davis, CA, USA ; Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California Davis Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gunkel M, Schöneberg J, Alkhaldi W, Irsen S, Noé F, Kaupp UB, Al-Amoudi A. Higher-order architecture of rhodopsin in intact photoreceptors and its implication for phototransduction kinetics. Structure 2015; 23:628-38. [PMID: 25728926 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Revised: 01/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The visual pigment rhodopsin belongs to the family of G protein-coupled receptors that can form higher oligomers. It is controversial whether rhodopsin forms oligomers and whether oligomers are functionally relevant. Here, we study rhodopsin organization in cryosections of dark-adapted mouse rod photoreceptors by cryoelectron tomography. We identify four hierarchical levels of organization. Rhodopsin forms dimers; at least ten dimers form a row. Rows form pairs (tracks) that are aligned parallel to the disk incisures. Particle-based simulation shows that the combination of tracks with fast precomplex formation, i.e. rapid association and dissociation between inactive rhodopsin and the G protein transducin, leads to kinetic trapping: rhodopsin first activates transducin from its own track, whereas recruitment of transducin from other tracks proceeds more slowly. The trap mechanism could produce uniform single-photon responses independent of rhodopsin lifetime. In general, tracks might provide a platform that coordinates the spatiotemporal interaction of signaling molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Gunkel
- Department of Molecular Sensory Systems, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Johannes Schöneberg
- Computational Molecular Biology Group, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Weaam Alkhaldi
- German Center of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Irsen
- Department of Molecular Sensory Systems, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank Noé
- Computational Molecular Biology Group, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - U Benjamin Kaupp
- Department of Molecular Sensory Systems, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Ashraf Al-Amoudi
- German Center of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sakurai K, Chen J, Khani SC, Kefalov VJ. Regulation of mammalian cone phototransduction by recoverin and rhodopsin kinase. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:9239-50. [PMID: 25673692 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.639591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Cone photoreceptors function under daylight conditions and are essential for color perception and vision with high temporal and spatial resolution. A remarkable feature of cones is that, unlike rods, they remain responsive in bright light. In rods, light triggers a decline in intracellular calcium, which exerts a well studied negative feedback on phototransduction that includes calcium-dependent inhibition of rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) by recoverin. Rods and cones share the same isoforms of recoverin and GRK1, and photoactivation also triggers a calcium decline in cones. However, the molecular mechanisms by which calcium exerts negative feedback on cone phototransduction through recoverin and GRK1 are not well understood. Here, we examined this question using mice expressing various levels of GRK1 or lacking recoverin. We show that although GRK1 is required for the timely inactivation of mouse cone photoresponse, gradually increasing its expression progressively delays the cone response recovery. This surprising result is in contrast with the known effect of increasing GRK1 expression in rods. Notably, the kinetics of cone responses converge and become independent of GRK1 levels for flashes activating more than ∼1% of cone pigment. Thus, mouse cone response recovery in bright light is independent of pigment phosphorylation and likely reflects the spontaneous decay of photoactivated visual pigment. We also find that recoverin potentiates the sensitivity of cones in dim light conditions but does not contribute to their capacity to function in bright light.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Sakurai
- From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
| | - Jeannie Chen
- the Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Department of Cell and Neurobiology & Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, and
| | - Shahrokh C Khani
- the Schepens Eye Research Institute and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Vladimir J Kefalov
- From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110,
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen CK, Woodruff ML, Fain GL. Rhodopsin kinase and recoverin modulate phosphodiesterase during mouse photoreceptor light adaptation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 145:213-24. [PMID: 25667411 PMCID: PMC4338159 DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201411273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Light stimulates rhodopsin in a retinal rod to activate the G protein transducin, which binds to phosphodiesterase (PDE), relieving PDE inhibition and decreasing guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) concentration. The decrease in cGMP closes outer segment channels, producing the rod electrical response. Prolonged exposure to light decreases sensitivity and accelerates response kinetics in a process known as light adaptation, mediated at least in part by a decrease in outer segment Ca(2+). Recent evidence indicates that one of the mechanisms of adaptation in mammalian rods is down-regulation of PDE. To investigate the effect of light and a possible role of rhodopsin kinase (G protein-coupled receptor kinase 1 [GRK1]) and the GRK1-regulating protein recoverin on PDE modulation, we used transgenic mice with decreased expression of GTPase-accelerating proteins (GAPs) and, consequently, a less rapid decay of the light response. This slowed decay made the effects of genetic manipulation of GRK1 and recoverin easier to observe and interpret. We monitored the decay of the light response and of light-activated PDE by measuring the exponential response decay time (τREC) and the limiting time constant (τD), the latter of which directly reflects light-activated PDE decay under the conditions of our experiments. We found that, in GAP-underexpressing rods, steady background light decreased both τREC and τD, and the decrease in τD was nearly linear with the decrease in amplitude of the outer segment current. Background light had little effect on τREC or τD if the gene for recoverin was deleted. Moreover, in GAP-underexpressing rods, increased GRK1 expression or deletion of recoverin produced large and highly significant accelerations of τREC and τD. The simplest explanation of our results is that Ca(2+)-dependent regulation of GRK1 by recoverin modulates the decay of light-activated PDE, and that this modulation is responsible for acceleration of response decay and the increase in temporal resolution of rods in background light.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Kang Chen
- Department of Ophthalmology and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 Department of Ophthalmology and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Michael L Woodruff
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Department of Ophthalmology, and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Gordon L Fain
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Department of Ophthalmology, and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Department of Ophthalmology, and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Department of Ophthalmology, and Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Arango-Gonzalez B, Trifunović D, Sahaboglu A, Kranz K, Michalakis S, Farinelli P, Koch S, Koch F, Cottet S, Janssen-Bienhold U, Dedek K, Biel M, Zrenner E, Euler T, Ekström P, Ueffing M, Paquet-Durand F. Identification of a common non-apoptotic cell death mechanism in hereditary retinal degeneration. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112142. [PMID: 25392995 PMCID: PMC4230983 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2014] [Accepted: 10/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Cell death in neurodegenerative diseases is often thought to be governed by apoptosis; however, an increasing body of evidence suggests the involvement of alternative cell death mechanisms in neuronal degeneration. We studied retinal neurodegeneration using 10 different animal models, covering all major groups of hereditary human blindness (rd1, rd2, rd10, Cngb1 KO, Rho KO, S334ter, P23H, Cnga3 KO, cpfl1, Rpe65 KO), by investigating metabolic processes relevant for different forms of cell death. We show that apoptosis plays only a minor role in the inherited forms of retinal neurodegeneration studied, where instead, a non-apoptotic degenerative mechanism common to all mutants is of major importance. Hallmark features of this pathway are activation of histone deacetylase, poly-ADP-ribose-polymerase, and calpain, as well as accumulation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate and poly-ADP-ribose. Our work thus demonstrates the prevalence of alternative cell death mechanisms in inherited retinal degeneration and provides a rational basis for the design of mutation-independent treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dragana Trifunović
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ayse Sahaboglu
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katharina Kranz
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Stylianos Michalakis
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich and Department of Pharmacy - Center for Drug Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Pietro Farinelli
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - Susanne Koch
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich and Department of Pharmacy - Center for Drug Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fred Koch
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich and Department of Pharmacy - Center for Drug Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sandra Cottet
- Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Sion, Switzerland
| | | | - Karin Dedek
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Martin Biel
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich and Department of Pharmacy - Center for Drug Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Eberhart Zrenner
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Euler
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Per Ekström
- Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marius Ueffing
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Arshavsky VY, Burns ME. Current understanding of signal amplification in phototransduction. CELLULAR LOGISTICS 2014; 4:e29390. [PMID: 25279249 PMCID: PMC4160332 DOI: 10.4161/cl.29390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The studies of visual signal transduction, or phototransduction, have played a pivotal role in elucidating the most general principles of G protein signaling, particularly in regards to the concept of signal amplification, i.e., the process by which activation of a relatively small number of G protein coupled receptors is transformed into a robust downstream signaling event. In this essay, we summarize our current quantitative understanding of this process in living rods of lower and higher vertebrate animals. An integration of biochemical experiments in vitro with electrophysiological recordings from intact rod photoreceptors indicates that the total number of G protein molecules activated in the course of a light response to a single photon is ~16 in the mouse and ~60 in the frog. This further translates into hydrolysis of ~2000 and ~72 000 molecules of cGMP downstream of G protein, respectively, which represents the total degree of biochemical amplification in the phototransduction cascade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim Y Arshavsky
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pharmacology; Duke University; Durham NC USA
| | - Marie E Burns
- Departments of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy and Ophthalmology and Vision Science; University of California; Davis, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Woodruff ML, Rajala A, Fain GL, Rajala RVS. Modulation of mouse rod photoreceptor responses by Grb14 protein. J Biol Chem 2013; 289:358-64. [PMID: 24273167 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.517045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous experiments have indicated that growth factor receptor-bound protein 14 (Grb14) may modulate rod photoreceptor cGMP-gated channels by decreasing channel affinity for cGMP; however, the function of Grb14 in rod physiology is not known. In this study, we examined the role of Grb14 by recording electrical responses from rods in which the gene for the Grb14 protein had been deleted. Suction-electrode recordings from single mouse rods showed that responses of dark-adapted Grb14(-/-) mice to brief flashes decayed more rapidly than strain-controlled wild type (WT) rods, with decreased values of both integration time and the exponential time course of decay (τREC). This result is consistent with an increase in channel affinity for cGMP produced by deletion of Grb14. However, Grb14(-/-) mouse rods also showed little change in dark current and a large and significant decrease in the limiting time constant τD, which are not consistent with an effect on channel affinity but seem rather to indicate modulation of the rate of inactivation of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6). Grb14 has been reported to translocate from the inner to the outer segment in bright light, but we saw effects on response time course even in dark-adapted rods, although the effects were somewhat greater after rods had been adapted by exposure to bleaching illumination. Our results indicate that the mechanism of Grb14 action may be more complex than previously realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Woodruff
- From the Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-7239
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Amphibian and mammalian rods can both detect single photons of light even though they differ greatly in physical dimensions, mammalian rods being much smaller in diameter than amphibian rods. To understand the changes in physiology and biochemistry required by such large differences in outer segment geometry, we developed a computational approach, taking into account the spatial organization of the outer segment divided into compartments, together with molecular dynamics simulations of the signaling cascade. We generated simulations of the single-photon response together with intrinsic background fluctuations in toad and mouse rods. Combining this computational approach with electrophysiological data from mouse rods, we determined key biochemical parameters. On average around one phosphodiesterase (PDE) molecule is spontaneously active per mouse compartment, similar to the value for toad, which is unexpected due to the much smaller diameter in mouse. A larger number of spontaneously active PDEs decreases dark noise, thereby improving detection of single photons; it also increases cGMP turnover, which accelerates the decay of the light response. These constraints explain the higher PDE density in mammalian compared with amphibian rods that compensates for the much smaller diameter of mammalian disks. We further find that the rate of cGMP hydrolysis by light-activated PDE is diffusion limited, which is not the case for spontaneously activated PDE. As a consequence, in the small outer segment of a mouse rod only a few activated PDEs are sufficient to generate a signal that overcomes noise, which permits a shorter lifetime of activated rhodopsin and greater temporal resolution.
Collapse
|
43
|
Evolution of phototransduction, vertebrate photoreceptors and retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013; 36:52-119. [DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2013] [Accepted: 06/02/2013] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
44
|
Koch KW, Dell’Orco D. A calcium-relay mechanism in vertebrate phototransduction. ACS Chem Neurosci 2013; 4:909-17. [PMID: 23472635 DOI: 10.1021/cn400027z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Calcium-signaling in cells requires a fine-tuned system of calcium-transport proteins involving ion channels, exchangers, and ion-pumps but also calcium-sensor proteins and their targets. Thus, control of physiological responses very often depends on incremental changes of the cytoplasmic calcium concentration, which are sensed by calcium-binding proteins and are further transmitted to specific target proteins. This Review will focus on calcium-signaling in vertebrate photoreceptor cells, where recent physiological and biochemical data indicate that a subset of neuronal calcium sensor proteins named guanylate cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs) operate in a calcium-relay system, namely, to make gradual responses to small changes in calcium. We will further integrate this mechanism in an existing computational model of phototransduction showing that it is consistent and compatible with the dynamics that are characteristic for the precise operation of the phototransduction pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Wilhelm Koch
- Department of Neurosciences,
Biochemistry Group, University of Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Strasse 9-11, D-26129 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Daniele Dell’Orco
- Department of Life Sciences
and Reproduction, Section of Biological Chemistry and Center for BioMedical
Computing (CBMC), University of Verona,
Strada le Grazie 8, I-37134 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|