1
|
Agudelo-Toro A, Michaels JA, Sheng WA, Scherberger H. Accurate neural control of a hand prosthesis by posture-related activity in the primate grasping circuit. Neuron 2024:S0896-6273(24)00688-3. [PMID: 39419024 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have the potential to restore hand movement for people with paralysis, but current devices still lack the fine control required to interact with objects of daily living. Following our understanding of cortical activity during arm reaches, hand BCI studies have focused primarily on velocity control. However, mounting evidence suggests that posture, and not velocity, dominates in hand-related areas. To explore whether this signal can causally control a prosthesis, we developed a BCI training paradigm centered on the reproduction of posture transitions. Monkeys trained with this protocol were able to control a multidimensional hand prosthesis with high accuracy, including execution of the very intricate precision grip. Analysis revealed that the posture signal in the target grasping areas was the main contributor to control. We present, for the first time, neural posture control of a multidimensional hand prosthesis, opening the door for future interfaces to leverage this additional information channel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Agudelo-Toro
- Neurobiology Laboratory, Deutsches Primatenzentrum GmbH, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
| | - Jonathan A Michaels
- Neurobiology Laboratory, Deutsches Primatenzentrum GmbH, Göttingen 37077, Germany; School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - Wei-An Sheng
- Neurobiology Laboratory, Deutsches Primatenzentrum GmbH, Göttingen 37077, Germany; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan
| | - Hansjörg Scherberger
- Neurobiology Laboratory, Deutsches Primatenzentrum GmbH, Göttingen 37077, Germany; Faculty of Biology and Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Urbin MA. Adaptation in the spinal cord after stroke: Implications for restoring cortical control over the final common pathway. J Physiol 2024. [PMID: 38787922 DOI: 10.1113/jp285563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Control of voluntary movement is predicated on integration between circuits in the brain and spinal cord. Although damage is often restricted to supraspinal or spinal circuits in cases of neurological injury, both spinal motor neurons and axons linking these cells to the cortical origins of descending motor commands begin showing changes soon after the brain is injured by stroke. The concept of 'transneuronal degeneration' is not new and has been documented in histological, imaging and electrophysiological studies dating back over a century. Taken together, evidence from these studies agrees more with a system attempting to survive rather than one passively surrendering to degeneration. There tends to be at least some preservation of fibres at the brainstem origin and along the spinal course of the descending white matter tracts, even in severe cases. Myelin-associated proteins are observed in the spinal cord years after stroke onset. Spinal motor neurons remain morphometrically unaltered. Skeletal muscle fibres once innervated by neurons that lose their source of trophic input receive collaterals from adjacent neurons, causing spinal motor units to consolidate and increase in size. Although some level of excitability within the distributed brain network mediating voluntary movement is needed to facilitate recovery, minimal structural connectivity between cortical and spinal motor neurons can support meaningful distal limb function. Restoring access to the final common pathway via the descending input that remains in the spinal cord therefore represents a viable target for directed plasticity, particularly in light of recent advances in rehabilitation medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Urbin
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA RR&D Center of Excellence, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marin Vargas A, Bisi A, Chiappa AS, Versteeg C, Miller LE, Mathis A. Task-driven neural network models predict neural dynamics of proprioception. Cell 2024; 187:1745-1761.e19. [PMID: 38518772 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Proprioception tells the brain the state of the body based on distributed sensory neurons. Yet, the principles that govern proprioceptive processing are poorly understood. Here, we employ a task-driven modeling approach to investigate the neural code of proprioceptive neurons in cuneate nucleus (CN) and somatosensory cortex area 2 (S1). We simulated muscle spindle signals through musculoskeletal modeling and generated a large-scale movement repertoire to train neural networks based on 16 hypotheses, each representing different computational goals. We found that the emerging, task-optimized internal representations generalize from synthetic data to predict neural dynamics in CN and S1 of primates. Computational tasks that aim to predict the limb position and velocity were the best at predicting the neural activity in both areas. Since task optimization develops representations that better predict neural activity during active than passive movements, we postulate that neural activity in the CN and S1 is top-down modulated during goal-directed movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Marin Vargas
- Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Axel Bisi
- Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alberto S Chiappa
- Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Chris Versteeg
- Department of Neuroscience, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Neuroscience, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Alexander Mathis
- Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hatsopoulos N, Moore D, MacLean J, Walker J. A dynamic subset of network interactions underlies tuning to natural movements in marmoset sensorimotor cortex. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3750312. [PMID: 38234779 PMCID: PMC10793486 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3750312/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Mechanisms of computation in sensorimotor cortex must be flexible and robust to support skilled motor behavior. Patterns of neuronal coactivity emerge as a result of computational processes. Pairwise spike-time statistical relationships, across the population, can be summarized as a functional network (FN) which retains single-unit properties. We record populations of single-unit neural activity in forelimb sensorimotor cortex during prey-capture and spontaneous behavior and use an encoding model incorporating kinematic trajectories and network features to predict single-unit activity during forelimb movements. The contribution of network features depends on structured connectivity within strongly connected functional groups. We identify a context-specific functional group that is highly tuned to kinematics and reorganizes its connectivity between spontaneous and prey-capture movements. In the remaining context-invariant group, interactions are comparatively stable across behaviors and units are less tuned to kinematics. This suggests different roles in producing natural forelimb movements and contextualizes single-unit tuning properties within population dynamics.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shelchkova ND, Downey JE, Greenspon CM, Okorokova EV, Sobinov AR, Verbaarschot C, He Q, Sponheim C, Tortolani AF, Moore DD, Kaufman MT, Lee RC, Satzer D, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Warnke PC, Miller LE, Boninger ML, Gaunt RA, Collinger JL, Hatsopoulos NG, Bensmaia SJ. Microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex evokes task-dependent, spatially patterned responses in motor cortex. Nat Commun 2023; 14:7270. [PMID: 37949923 PMCID: PMC10638421 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43140-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortices play critical roles in motor control but the signaling between these structures is poorly understood. To fill this gap, we recorded - in three participants in an ongoing human clinical trial (NCT01894802) for people with paralyzed hands - the responses evoked in the hand and arm representations of M1 during intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in the hand representation of S1. We found that ICMS of S1 activated some M1 neurons at short, fixed latencies consistent with monosynaptic activation. Additionally, most of the ICMS-evoked responses in M1 were more variable in time, suggesting indirect effects of stimulation. The spatial pattern of M1 activation varied systematically: S1 electrodes that elicited percepts in a finger preferentially activated M1 neurons excited during that finger's movement. Moreover, the indirect effects of S1 ICMS on M1 were context dependent, such that the magnitude and even sign relative to baseline varied across tasks. We tested the implications of these effects for brain-control of a virtual hand, in which ICMS conveyed tactile feedback. While ICMS-evoked activation of M1 disrupted decoder performance, this disruption was minimized using biomimetic stimulation, which emphasizes contact transients at the onset and offset of grasp, and reduces sustained stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalya D Shelchkova
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John E Downey
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Charles M Greenspon
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Anton R Sobinov
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ceci Verbaarschot
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Qinpu He
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Caleb Sponheim
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ariana F Tortolani
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dalton D Moore
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew T Kaufman
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ray C Lee
- Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Satzer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Peter C Warnke
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael L Boninger
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Gaunt
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Collinger
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mirfathollahi A, Ghodrati MT, Shalchyan V, Zarrindast MR, Daliri MR. Decoding hand kinetics and kinematics using somatosensory cortex activity in active and passive movement. iScience 2023; 26:107808. [PMID: 37736040 PMCID: PMC10509302 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Area 2 of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), encodes proprioceptive information of limbs. Several studies investigated the encoding of movement parameters in this area. However, the single-trial decoding of these parameters, which can provide additional knowledge about the amount of information available in sub-regions of this area about instantaneous limb movement, has not been well investigated. We decoded kinematic and kinetic parameters of active and passive hand movement during center-out task using conventional and state-based decoders. Our results show that this area can be used to accurately decode position, velocity, force, moment, and joint angles of hand. Kinematics had higher accuracies compared to kinetics and active trials were decoded more accurately than passive trials. Although the state-based decoder outperformed the conventional decoder in the active task, it was the opposite in the passive task. These results can be used in intracortical micro-stimulation procedures to provide proprioceptive feedback to BCI subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alavie Mirfathollahi
- Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Pardis 16583- 44575 Tehran, Iran
- Neuroscience & Neuroengineering Research Lab, Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran
| | - Mohammad Taghi Ghodrati
- Neuroscience & Neuroengineering Research Lab, Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran
| | - Vahid Shalchyan
- Neuroscience & Neuroengineering Research Lab, Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Zarrindast
- Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Pardis 16583- 44575 Tehran, Iran
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14166-34793, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Daliri
- Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Pardis 16583- 44575 Tehran, Iran
- Neuroscience & Neuroengineering Research Lab, Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Egle F, Di Domenico D, Marinelli A, Boccardo N, Canepa M, Laffranchi M, De Michieli L, Castellini C. Preliminary Assessment of Two Simultaneous and Proportional Myocontrol Methods for 3-DoFs Prostheses Using Incremental Learning. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2023; 2023:1-6. [PMID: 37941277 DOI: 10.1109/icorr58425.2023.10304813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Despite progressive developments over the last decades, current upper limb prostheses still lack a suitable control able to fully restore the functionalities of the lost arm. Traditional control approaches for prostheses fail when simultaneously actuating multiple Degrees of Freedom (DoFs), thus limiting their usability in daily-life scenarios. Machine learning, on the one hand, offers a solution to this issue through a promising approach for decoding user intentions but fails when input signals change. Incremental learning, on the other hand, reduces sources of error by quickly updating the model on new data rather than training the control model from scratch. In this study, we present an initial evaluation of a position and a velocity control strategy for simultaneous and proportional control over 3-DoFs based on incremental learning. The proposed controls are tested using a virtual Hannes prosthesis on two healthy participants. The performances are evaluated over eight sessions by performing the Target Achievement Control test and administering SUS and NASA-TLX questionnaires. Overall, this preliminary study demonstrates that both control strategies are promising approaches for prosthetic control, offering the potential to improve the usability of prostheses for individuals with limb loss. Further research extended to a wider population of both healthy subjects and amputees will be essential to thoroughly assess these control paradigms.
Collapse
|
8
|
Geelen JE, van der Helm FCT, Schouten AC, Mugge W. Sensory weighting of position and force feedback during pinching. Exp Brain Res 2023:10.1007/s00221-023-06654-1. [PMID: 37382669 PMCID: PMC10386968 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06654-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Human hands are complex biomechanical systems that allow for dexterous tasks with many degrees of freedom. Coordination of the fingers is essential for many activities of daily living and involves integrating sensory signals. During this sensory integration, the central nervous system deals with the uncertainty of sensory signals. When handling compliant objects, force and position are related. Interactions with stiff objects result in reduced position changes and increased force changes compared to compliant objects. Literature has shown sensory integration of force and position at the shoulder. Nevertheless, differences in sensory requirements between proximal and distal joints may lead to different proprioceptive representations, hence findings at proximal joints cannot be directly transferred to distal joints, such as the digits. Here, we investigate the sensory integration of force and position during pinching. A haptic manipulator rendered a virtual spring with adjustable stiffness between the index finger and the thumb. Participants had to blindly reproduce a force against the spring. In both visual reference trials and blind reproduction trials, the relation between pinch force and spring compression was constant. However, by covertly changing the spring characteristics in catch trials into an adjusted force-position relation, the participants' weighting of force and position could be revealed. In agreement with previous studies on the shoulder, participants relied more on force sense in trials with higher stiffness. This study demonstrated stiffness-dependent sensory integration of force and position feedback during pinching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinne E Geelen
- BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands.
| | - Frans C T van der Helm
- BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands
| | - Alfred C Schouten
- BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands
| | - Winfred Mugge
- BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sandbrink KJ, Mamidanna P, Michaelis C, Bethge M, Mathis MW, Mathis A. Contrasting action and posture coding with hierarchical deep neural network models of proprioception. eLife 2023; 12:e81499. [PMID: 37254843 PMCID: PMC10361732 DOI: 10.7554/elife.81499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Biological motor control is versatile, efficient, and depends on proprioceptive feedback. Muscles are flexible and undergo continuous changes, requiring distributed adaptive control mechanisms that continuously account for the body's state. The canonical role of proprioception is representing the body state. We hypothesize that the proprioceptive system could also be critical for high-level tasks such as action recognition. To test this theory, we pursued a task-driven modeling approach, which allowed us to isolate the study of proprioception. We generated a large synthetic dataset of human arm trajectories tracing characters of the Latin alphabet in 3D space, together with muscle activities obtained from a musculoskeletal model and model-based muscle spindle activity. Next, we compared two classes of tasks: trajectory decoding and action recognition, which allowed us to train hierarchical models to decode either the position and velocity of the end-effector of one's posture or the character (action) identity from the spindle firing patterns. We found that artificial neural networks could robustly solve both tasks, and the networks' units show tuning properties similar to neurons in the primate somatosensory cortex and the brainstem. Remarkably, we found uniformly distributed directional selective units only with the action-recognition-trained models and not the trajectory-decoding-trained models. This suggests that proprioceptive encoding is additionally associated with higher-level functions such as action recognition and therefore provides new, experimentally testable hypotheses of how proprioception aids in adaptive motor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai J Sandbrink
- The Rowland Institute at Harvard, Harvard UniversityCambridgeUnited States
| | - Pranav Mamidanna
- Tübingen AI Center, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen & Institute for Theoretical PhysicsTübingenGermany
| | - Claudio Michaelis
- Tübingen AI Center, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen & Institute for Theoretical PhysicsTübingenGermany
| | - Matthias Bethge
- Tübingen AI Center, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen & Institute for Theoretical PhysicsTübingenGermany
| | - Mackenzie Weygandt Mathis
- The Rowland Institute at Harvard, Harvard UniversityCambridgeUnited States
- Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneGenèveSwitzerland
| | - Alexander Mathis
- The Rowland Institute at Harvard, Harvard UniversityCambridgeUnited States
- Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneGenèveSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guan C, Aflalo T, Kadlec K, Gámez de Leon J, Rosario ER, Bari A, Pouratian N, Andersen RA. Decoding and geometry of ten finger movements in human posterior parietal cortex and motor cortex. J Neural Eng 2023; 20:036020. [PMID: 37160127 PMCID: PMC10209510 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acd3b1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Enable neural control of individual prosthetic fingers for participants with upper-limb paralysis.Approach. Two tetraplegic participants were each implanted with a 96-channel array in the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC). One of the participants was additionally implanted with a 96-channel array near the hand knob of the left motor cortex (MC). Across tens of sessions, we recorded neural activity while the participants attempted to move individual fingers of the right hand. Offline, we classified attempted finger movements from neural firing rates using linear discriminant analysis with cross-validation. The participants then used the neural classifier online to control individual fingers of a brain-machine interface (BMI). Finally, we characterized the neural representational geometry during individual finger movements of both hands.Main Results. The two participants achieved 86% and 92% online accuracy during BMI control of the contralateral fingers (chance = 17%). Offline, a linear decoder achieved ten-finger decoding accuracies of 70% and 66% using respective PPC recordings and 75% using MC recordings (chance = 10%). In MC and in one PPC array, a factorized code linked corresponding finger movements of the contralateral and ipsilateral hands.Significance. This is the first study to decode both contralateral and ipsilateral finger movements from PPC. Online BMI control of contralateral fingers exceeded that of previous finger BMIs. PPC and MC signals can be used to control individual prosthetic fingers, which may contribute to a hand restoration strategy for people with tetraplegia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Guan
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
| | - Tyson Aflalo
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
- T&C Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center at Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
| | - Kelly Kadlec
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
| | | | - Emily R Rosario
- Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, CA, United States of America
| | - Ausaf Bari
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Nader Pouratian
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Richard A Andersen
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
- T&C Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center at Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alonso I, Scheer I, Palacio-Manzano M, Frézel-Jacob N, Philippides A, Prsa M. Peripersonal encoding of forelimb proprioception in the mouse somatosensory cortex. Nat Commun 2023; 14:1866. [PMID: 37045825 PMCID: PMC10097678 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37575-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Conscious perception of limb movements depends on proprioceptive neural responses in the somatosensory cortex. In contrast to tactile sensations, proprioceptive cortical coding is barely studied in the mammalian brain and practically non-existent in rodent research. To understand the cortical representation of this important sensory modality we developed a passive forelimb displacement paradigm in behaving mice and also trained them to perceptually discriminate where their limb is moved in space. We delineated the rodent proprioceptive cortex with wide-field calcium imaging and optogenetic silencing experiments during behavior. Our results reveal that proprioception is represented in both sensory and motor cortical areas. In addition, behavioral measurements and responses of layer 2/3 neurons imaged with two-photon microscopy reveal that passive limb movements are both perceived and encoded in the mouse cortex as a spatial direction vector that interfaces the limb with the body's peripersonal space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Alonso
- Department of Neuroscience and Movement Science, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Irina Scheer
- Department of Neuroscience and Movement Science, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Mélanie Palacio-Manzano
- Department of Neuroscience and Movement Science, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Noémie Frézel-Jacob
- Department of Neuroscience and Movement Science, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Antoine Philippides
- Department of Basic Neurosciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mario Prsa
- Department of Neuroscience and Movement Science, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alessandro C, Prashara A, Tentler DP, Tresch MC. Inhibition of knee joint sensory afferents alters covariation across strides between quadriceps muscles during locomotion. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2023; 134:957-968. [PMID: 36759157 PMCID: PMC10069963 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00591.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Sport-related injuries to articular structures often alter the sensory information conveyed by joint structures to the nervous system. However, the role of joint sensory afferents in motor control is still unclear. Here, we evaluate the role of knee joint sensory afferents in the control of quadriceps muscles, hypothesizing that such sensory information modulates control strategies that limit patellofemoreal joint loading. We compared locomotor kinematics and muscle activity before and after inhibition of knee sensory afferents by injection of lidocaine into the knee capsule of rats. We evaluated whether this inhibition reduced the strength of correlation between the activity of vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) both across strides and within each stride, coordination patterns that limit net mediolateral patellofemoral forces. We also evaluated whether this inhibition altered correlations among the other quadriceps muscle activity, the time-profiles of individual EMG envelopes, or movement kinematics. Neither the EMG envelopes nor limb kinematics was affected by the inhibition of knee sensory afferents. This perturbation also did not affect the correlations between VM and VL, suggesting that the regulation of patellofemoral joint loading is mediated by different mechanisms. However, inhibition of knee sensory afferents caused a significant reduction in the correlation between vastus intermedius (VI) and both VM and VL across, but not within, strides. Knee joint sensory afferents may therefore modulate the coordination between the vasti muscles but only at coarse time scales. Injuries compromising joint afferents might result in altered muscle coordination, potentially leading to persistent internal joint stresses and strains.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sensory afferents originating from knee joint receptors provide the nervous system with information about the internal state of the joint. In this study, we show that these sensory signals are used to modulate the covariations among the activity of a subset of vasti muscles across strides of locomotion. Sport-related injuries that damage joint receptors may therefore compromise these mechanisms of muscle coordination, potentially leading to persistent internal joint stresses and strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Alessandro
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
- School of Medicine and Surgery/Sport and Exercise Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Adarsh Prashara
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States
| | - David P Tentler
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Matthew C Tresch
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Keogh C, FitzGerald JJ. Decomposition into dynamic features reveals a conserved temporal structure in hand kinematics. iScience 2022; 25:105428. [PMID: 36388974 PMCID: PMC9641230 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The human hand is a unique and highly complex effector. The ability to describe hand kinematics with a small number of features suggests that complex hand movements are composed of combinations of simpler movements. This would greatly simplify the neural control of hand movements. If such movement primitives exist, a dimensionality reduction approach designed to exploit these features should outperform existing methods. We developed a deep neural network to capture the temporal dynamics of movements and demonstrate that the features learned allow accurate representation of functional hand movements using lower-dimensional representations than previously reported. We show that these temporal features are highly conserved across individuals and can interpolate previously unseen movements, indicating that they capture the intrinsic structure of hand movements. These results indicate that functional hand movements are defined by a low-dimensional basis set of movement primitives with important temporal dynamics and that these features are common across individuals. Hand movements are comprised of a low-dimensional set of movement primitives Primitive movements have an important temporal component Spatiotemporal movement primitives are conserved across individuals New complex movements can be flexibly reconstructed using these primitives
Collapse
|
14
|
Yan Y, Sobinov AR, Bensmaia SJ. Prehension kinematics in humans and macaques. J Neurophysiol 2022; 127:1669-1678. [PMID: 35642848 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00522.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-human primates, especially rhesus macaques, have been a dominant model to study sensorimotor control of the upper limbs. Indeed, human and macaques have similar hands and homologous neural circuits to mediate manual behavior. However, few studies have systematically and quantitatively compared the manual behaviors of the two species. Such comparison is critical for assessing the validity of using the macaque sensorimotor system as a model of its human counterpart. In this study, we systematically compared the prehensile behaviors of humans and rhesus macaques using an identical experimental setup. We found human and macaque prehension kinematics to be generally similar with a few subtle differences. While the structure of the pre-shaping hand postures is similar in humans and macaques, human postures are more object-specific and human joints are less intercorrelated. Conversely, monkeys demonstrate more stereotypical pre-shaping behaviors that are common across all objects and more variability in their postures across repeated presentations of the same object. Despite these subtle differences in manual behavior between humans and monkeys, our results bolster the use of the macaque model to understand the neural mechanisms of manual dexterity in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuke Yan
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.,Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Anton R Sobinov
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.,Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.,Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li Y, Wang P, Li R, Tao M, Liu Z, Qiao H. A Survey of Multifingered Robotic Manipulation: Biological Results, Structural Evolvements, and Learning Methods. Front Neurorobot 2022; 16:843267. [PMID: 35574228 PMCID: PMC9097019 DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.843267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Multifingered robotic hands (usually referred to as dexterous hands) are designed to achieve human-level or human-like manipulations for robots or as prostheses for the disabled. The research dates back 30 years ago, yet, there remain great challenges to effectively design and control them due to their high dimensionality of configuration, frequently switched interaction modes, and various task generalization requirements. This article aims to give a brief overview of multifingered robotic manipulation from three aspects: a) the biological results, b) the structural evolvements, and c) the learning methods, and discuss potential future directions. First, we investigate the structure and principle of hand-centered visual sensing, tactile sensing, and motor control and related behavioral results. Then, we review several typical multifingered dexterous hands from task scenarios, actuation mechanisms, and in-hand sensors points. Third, we report the recent progress of various learning-based multifingered manipulation methods, including but not limited to reinforcement learning, imitation learning, and other sub-class methods. The article concludes with open issues and our thoughts on future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinlin Li
- State Key Laboratory for Management and Control of Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Wang
- State Key Laboratory for Management and Control of Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Hong Kong Institute of Science and Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hong Kong, China
| | - Rui Li
- School of Automation, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Mo Tao
- Science and Technology on Thermal Energy and Power Laboratory, Wuhan Second Ship Design and Research Institute, Wuhan, China
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyong Liu
- State Key Laboratory for Management and Control of Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Qiao
- State Key Laboratory for Management and Control of Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pandarinath C, Bensmaia SJ. The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands. Physiol Rev 2022; 102:551-604. [PMID: 34541898 PMCID: PMC8742729 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in our understanding of brain function, along with the development of neural interfaces that allow for the monitoring and activation of neurons, have paved the way for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which harness neural signals to reanimate the limbs via electrical activation of the muscles or to control extracorporeal devices, thereby bypassing the muscles and senses altogether. BMIs consist of reading out motor intent from the neuronal responses monitored in motor regions of the brain and executing intended movements with bionic limbs, reanimated limbs, or exoskeletons. BMIs also allow for the restoration of the sense of touch by electrically activating neurons in somatosensory regions of the brain, thereby evoking vivid tactile sensations and conveying feedback about object interactions. In this review, we discuss the neural mechanisms of motor control and somatosensation in able-bodied individuals and describe approaches to use neuronal responses as control signals for movement restoration and to activate residual sensory pathways to restore touch. Although the focus of the review is on intracortical approaches, we also describe alternative signal sources for control and noninvasive strategies for sensory restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chethan Pandarinath
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology, and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wandelt SK, Kellis S, Bjånes DA, Pejsa K, Lee B, Liu C, Andersen RA. Decoding grasp and speech signals from the cortical grasp circuit in a tetraplegic human. Neuron 2022; 110:1777-1787.e3. [PMID: 35364014 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The cortical grasp network encodes planning and execution of grasps and processes spoken and written aspects of language. High-level cortical areas within this network are attractive implant sites for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs). While a tetraplegic patient performed grasp motor imagery and vocalized speech, neural activity was recorded from the supramarginal gyrus (SMG), ventral premotor cortex (PMv), and somatosensory cortex (S1). In SMG and PMv, five imagined grasps were well represented by firing rates of neuronal populations during visual cue presentation. During motor imagery, these grasps were significantly decodable from all brain areas. During speech production, SMG encoded both spoken grasp types and the names of five colors. Whereas PMv neurons significantly modulated their activity during grasping, SMG's neural population broadly encoded features of both motor imagery and speech. Together, these results indicate that brain signals from high-level areas of the human cortex could be used for grasping and speech BMI applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K Wandelt
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; T&C Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
| | - Spencer Kellis
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; T&C Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - David A Bjånes
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; T&C Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | - Kelsie Pejsa
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; T&C Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | - Brian Lee
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Charles Liu
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, USA
| | - Richard A Andersen
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; T&C Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Intramuscle Synergies: Their Place in the Neural Control Hierarchy. Motor Control 2022; 27:402-441. [PMID: 36543175 DOI: 10.1123/mc.2022-0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
We accept a definition of synergy introduced by Nikolai Bernstein and develop it for various actions, from those involving the whole body to those involving a single muscle. Furthermore, we use two major theoretical developments in the field of motor control—the idea of hierarchical control with spatial referent coordinates and the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis—to discuss recent studies of synergies within spaces of individual motor units (MUs) recorded within a single muscle. During the accurate finger force production tasks, MUs within hand extrinsic muscles form robust groups, with parallel scaling of the firing frequencies. The loading factors at individual MUs within each of the two main groups link them to the reciprocal and coactivation commands. Furthermore, groups are recruited in a task-specific way with gains that covary to stabilize muscle force. Such force-stabilizing synergies are seen in MUs recorded in the agonist and antagonist muscles but not in the spaces of MUs combined over the two muscles. These observations reflect inherent trade-offs between synergies at different levels of a control hierarchy. MU-based synergies do not show effects of hand dominance, whereas such effects are seen in multifinger synergies. Involuntary, reflex-based, force changes are stabilized by intramuscle synergies but not by multifinger synergies. These observations suggest that multifinger (multimuscle synergies) are based primarily on supraspinal circuitry, whereas intramuscle synergies reflect spinal circuitry. Studies of intra- and multimuscle synergies promise a powerful tool for exploring changes in spinal and supraspinal circuitry across patient populations.
Collapse
|
19
|
Davis M, Wang Y, Bao S, Buchanan JJ, Wright DL, Lei Y. The Interactions Between Primary Somatosensory and Motor Cortex during Human Grasping Behaviors. Neuroscience 2021; 485:1-11. [PMID: 34848261 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Afferent inputs to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) are differentially processed during precision and power grip in humans. However, it remains unclear how S1 interacts with the primary motor cortex (M1) during these two grasping behaviors. To address this question, we measured short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI), reflecting S1-M1 interactions via thalamo-cortical pathways, using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during precision and power grip. The TMS coil over the hand representation of M1 was oriented in the posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) direction to activate distinct sets of corticospinal neurons. We found that SAI increased during precision compared with power grip when AP, but not PA, currents were applied. Notably, SAI tested in the AP direction were similar during two-digit than five-digit precision grip. The M1 receives movement information from S1 through direct cortico-cortical pathways, so intra-hemispheric S1-M1 interactions using dual-site TMS were also evaluated. Stimulation of S1 attenuated M1 excitability (S1-M1 inhibition) during precision and power grip, while the S1-M1 inhibition ratio remained similar across tasks. Taken together,our findings suggest that distinct neural mechanisms for S1-M1 interactions mediate precision and power grip, presumably by modulating neural activity along thalamo-cortical pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison Davis
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States
| | - Yiyu Wang
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States
| | - Shancheng Bao
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States
| | - John J Buchanan
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States
| | - David L Wright
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States
| | - Yuming Lei
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sobinov AR, Bensmaia SJ. The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2021; 22:741-757. [PMID: 34711956 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-021-00528-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The hand endows us with unparalleled precision and versatility in our interactions with objects, from mundane activities such as grasping to extraordinary ones such as virtuoso pianism. The complex anatomy of the human hand combined with expansive and specialized neuronal control circuits allows a wide range of precise manual behaviours. To support these behaviours, an exquisite sensory apparatus, spanning the modalities of touch and proprioception, conveys detailed and timely information about our interactions with objects and about the objects themselves. The study of manual dexterity provides a unique lens into the sensorimotor mechanisms that endow the nervous system with the ability to flexibly generate complex behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton R Sobinov
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
O'Connor DH, Krubitzer L, Bensmaia S. Of mice and monkeys: Somatosensory processing in two prominent animal models. Prog Neurobiol 2021; 201:102008. [PMID: 33587956 PMCID: PMC8096687 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of the neural basis of somatosensation is based largely on studies of the whisker system of mice and rats and the hands of macaque monkeys. Results across these animal models are often interpreted as providing direct insight into human somatosensation. Work on these systems has proceeded in parallel, capitalizing on the strengths of each model, but has rarely been considered as a whole. This lack of integration promotes a piecemeal understanding of somatosensation. Here, we examine the functions and morphologies of whiskers of mice and rats, the hands of macaque monkeys, and the somatosensory neuraxes of these three species. We then discuss how somatosensory information is encoded in their respective nervous systems, highlighting similarities and differences. We reflect on the limitations of these models of human somatosensation and consider key gaps in our understanding of the neural basis of somatosensation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H O'Connor
- Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States; Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, United States
| | - Leah Krubitzer
- Department of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, United States
| | - Sliman Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, United States; Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, United States; Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology, and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lutz OJ, Bensmaia SJ. Proprioceptive representations of the hand in somatosensory cortex. CURRENT OPINION IN PHYSIOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cophys.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
23
|
Mirdamadi JL, Block HJ. Somatosensory versus cerebellar contributions to proprioceptive changes associated with motor skill learning: A theta burst stimulation study. Cortex 2021; 140:98-109. [PMID: 33962318 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is well established that proprioception (position sense) is important for motor control, yet its role in motor learning and associated plasticity is not well understood. We previously demonstrated that motor skill learning is associated with enhanced proprioception and changes in sensorimotor neurophysiology. However, the neural substrates mediating these effects are unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine whether suppressing activity in the cerebellum and somatosensory cortex (S1) affects proprioceptive changes associated with motor skill learning. METHODS 54 healthy young adults practiced a skill involving visually-guided 2D reaching movements through an irregular-shaped track using a robotic manipulandum with their right hand. Proprioception was measured using a passive two-alternative choice task before and after motor practice. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) was delivered over S1 or the cerebellum (CB) at the end of training for two consecutive days. We compared group differences (S1, CB, Sham) in proprioception and motor skill, quantified by a speed-accuracy function, measured on a third consecutive day (retention). RESULTS As shown previously, the Sham group demonstrated enhanced proprioceptive sensitivity after training and at retention. The S1 group had impaired proprioceptive function at retention through online changes during practice, whereas the CB group demonstrated offline decrements in proprioceptive function. All groups demonstrated motor skill learning. However, the magnitude of learning differed between the CB and Sham groups, consistent with a role for the cerebellum in motor learning. CONCLUSION Overall, these findings suggest that the cerebellum and S1 are important for distinct aspects of proprioceptive changes during skill learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine L Mirdamadi
- Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - Hannah J Block
- Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Francesco Edoardo V, Stefano D, Matteo F, Claudio G, Patrizia F. A Poisson generalized linear model application to disentangle the effects of various parameters on neurophysiological discharges. STAR Protoc 2021; 2:100413. [PMID: 33870221 PMCID: PMC8042415 DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The protocol provides an extensive guide to apply the generalized linear model framework to neurophysiological recordings. This flexible technique can be adapted to test and quantify the contributions of many different parameters (e.g., kinematics, target position, choice, reward) on neural activity. To weight the influence of each parameter, we developed an intuitive metric (“w-value”) that can be used to build a “functional fingerprint” characteristic for each neuron. We also provide suggestions to extract complementary useful information from the method. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Diomedi et al. (2020). GLM applied to neuronal discharges reveals parameters that modulate their activity Applying regularizers helps to discard minority parameters and reduces noise Each neuron can be characterized by the weight assigned to each parameter tested Results are well suited for population analyses (i.e., clustering, correlation, etc)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diomedi Stefano
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy
| | - Filippini Matteo
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy
| | - Galletti Claudio
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy
| | - Fattori Patrizia
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Suresh AK, Goodman JM, Okorokova EV, Kaufman M, Hatsopoulos NG, Bensmaia SJ. Neural population dynamics in motor cortex are different for reach and grasp. eLife 2020; 9:e58848. [PMID: 33200745 PMCID: PMC7688308 DOI: 10.7554/elife.58848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Low-dimensional linear dynamics are observed in neuronal population activity in primary motor cortex (M1) when monkeys make reaching movements. This population-level behavior is consistent with a role for M1 as an autonomous pattern generator that drives muscles to give rise to movement. In the present study, we examine whether similar dynamics are also observed during grasping movements, which involve fundamentally different patterns of kinematics and muscle activations. Using a variety of analytical approaches, we show that M1 does not exhibit such dynamics during grasping movements. Rather, the grasp-related neuronal dynamics in M1 are similar to their counterparts in somatosensory cortex, whose activity is driven primarily by afferent inputs rather than by intrinsic dynamics. The basic structure of the neuronal activity underlying hand control is thus fundamentally different from that underlying arm control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneesha K Suresh
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
| | - James M Goodman
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
| | | | - Matthew Kaufman
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
- Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology and Human Behavior, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
| | - Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
- Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology and Human Behavior, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
- Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology and Human Behavior, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Diomedi S, Vaccari FE, Filippini M, Fattori P, Galletti C. Mixed Selectivity in Macaque Medial Parietal Cortex during Eye-Hand Reaching. iScience 2020; 23:101616. [PMID: 33089104 PMCID: PMC7559278 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The activity of neurons of the medial posterior parietal area V6A in macaque monkeys is modulated by many aspects of reach task. In the past, research was mostly focused on modulating the effect of single parameters upon the activity of V6A cells. Here, we used Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) to simultaneously test the contribution of several factors upon V6A cells during a fix-to-reach task. This approach resulted in the definition of a representative “functional fingerprint” for each neuron. We first studied how the features are distributed in the population. Our analysis highlighted the virtual absence of units strictly selective for only one factor and revealed that most cells are characterized by “mixed selectivity.” Then, exploiting our GLM framework, we investigated the dynamics of spatial parameters encoded within V6A. We found that the tuning is not static, but changed along the trial, indicating the sequential occurrence of visuospatial transformations helpful to guide arm movement. The parietal cortex integrates a variety of sensorimotor inputs to guide reaching GLM disentangled the effect of various reaching parameters upon cell activity V6A neurons were not functionally clustered, but characterized by mixed selectivity Spatial selectivity was dynamic and reached its peak during the movement phase
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Diomedi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco E. Vaccari
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Filippini
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Corresponding author
| | - Patrizia Fattori
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Corresponding author
| | - Claudio Galletti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gaglianese A, Branco MP, Groen IIA, Benson NC, Vansteensel MJ, Murray MM, Petridou N, Ramsey NF. Electrocorticography Evidence of Tactile Responses in Visual Cortices. Brain Topogr 2020; 33:559-570. [PMID: 32661933 PMCID: PMC7429547 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-020-00783-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
There is ongoing debate regarding the extent to which human cortices are specialized for processing a given sensory input versus a given type of information, independently of the sensory source. Many neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies have reported that primary and extrastriate visual cortices respond to tactile and auditory stimulation, in addition to visual inputs, suggesting these cortices are intrinsically multisensory. In particular for tactile responses, few studies have proven neuronal processes in visual cortex in humans. Here, we assessed tactile responses in both low-level and extrastriate visual cortices using electrocorticography recordings in a human participant. Specifically, we observed significant spectral power increases in the high frequency band (30-100 Hz) in response to tactile stimuli, reportedly associated with spiking neuronal activity, in both low-level visual cortex (i.e. V2) and in the anterior part of the lateral occipital-temporal cortex. These sites were both involved in processing tactile information and responsive to visual stimulation. More generally, the present results add to a mounting literature in support of task-sensitive and sensory-independent mechanisms underlying functions like spatial, motion, and self-processing in the brain and extending from higher-level as well as to low-level cortices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gaglianese
- The Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology, University Hospital Center, University of Lausanne, Rue Centrale 7, Lausanne, 1003, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mariana P Branco
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris I A Groen
- Department of Psychology, New York University, Washington Place 6, New York, 10003, NY, USA
| | - Noah C Benson
- Department of Psychology, New York University, Washington Place 6, New York, 10003, NY, USA
- eScience Institute, University of Washington, 15th Ave NE, Seattle, 98195, WA, USA
| | - Mariska J Vansteensel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Micah M Murray
- The Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology, University Hospital Center, University of Lausanne, Rue Centrale 7, Lausanne, 1003, Switzerland
- Sensory, Perceptual and Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Station 6, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland
- Ophthalmology Service, Fondation Asile des aveugles and University of Lausanne, Avenue de France 15, Lausanne, 1004, Switzerland
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, 21st Avenue South 1215, Nashville, 37232, TN, USA
| | - Natalia Petridou
- Department of Radiology, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nick F Ramsey
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Okorokova EV, Goodman JM, Hatsopoulos NG, Bensmaia SJ. Decoding hand kinematics from population responses in sensorimotor cortex during grasping. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:046035. [PMID: 32442987 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab95ea] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The hand-a complex effector comprising dozens of degrees of freedom of movement-endows us with the ability to flexibly, precisely, and effortlessly interact with objects. The neural signals associated with dexterous hand movements in primary motor cortex (M1) and somatosensory cortex (SC) have received comparatively less attention than have those associated with proximal upper limb control. APPROACH To fill this gap, we trained two monkeys to grasp objects varying in size and shape while tracking their hand postures and recording single-unit activity from M1 and SC. We then decoded their hand kinematics across tens of joints from population activity in these areas. MAIN RESULTS We found that we could accurately decode kinematics with a small number of neural signals and that different cortical fields carry different amounts of information about hand kinematics. In particular, neural signals in rostral M1 led to better performance than did signals in caudal M1, whereas Brodmann's area 3a outperformed areas 1 and 2 in SC. Moreover, decoding performance was higher for joint angles than joint angular velocities, in contrast to what has been found with proximal limb decoders. SIGNIFICANCE We conclude that cortical signals can be used for dexterous hand control in brain machine interface applications and that postural representations in SC may be exploited via intracortical stimulation to close the sensorimotor loop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizaveta V Okorokova
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Center for Bioelectric Interfaces, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|