1
|
Ji Y, Yang C, Pang X, Yan Y, Wu Y, Geng Z, Hu W, Hu P, Wu X, Wang K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: effects on neural and synaptic rehabilitation. Neural Regen Res 2025; 20:326-342. [PMID: 38819037 PMCID: PMC11317939 DOI: 10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-23-01201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is a neurodegenerative disease resulting from deficits in synaptic transmission and homeostasis. The Alzheimer's disease brain tends to be hyperexcitable and hypersynchronized, thereby causing neurodegeneration and ultimately disrupting the operational abilities in daily life, leaving patients incapacitated. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a cost-effective, neuro-modulatory technique used for multiple neurological conditions. Over the past two decades, it has been widely used to predict cognitive decline; identify pathophysiological markers; promote neuroplasticity; and assess brain excitability, plasticity, and connectivity. It has also been applied to patients with dementia, because it can yield facilitatory effects on cognition and promote brain recovery after a neurological insult. However, its therapeutic effectiveness at the molecular and synaptic levels has not been elucidated because of a limited number of studies. This study aimed to characterize the neurobiological changes following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment, evaluate its effects on synaptic plasticity, and identify the associated mechanisms. This review essentially focuses on changes in the pathology, amyloidogenesis, and clearance pathways, given that amyloid deposition is a major hypothesis in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Apoptotic mechanisms associated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation procedures and different pathways mediating gene transcription, which are closely related to the neural regeneration process, are also highlighted. Finally, we discuss the outcomes of animal studies in which neuroplasticity is modulated and assessed at the structural and functional levels by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, with the aim to highlight future directions for better clinical translations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Ji
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Chaoyi Yang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Xuerui Pang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Yibing Yan
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Yue Wu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Zhi Geng
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Wenjie Hu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Panpan Hu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Xingqi Wu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
- Department of Psychology and Sleep Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wischnewski M, Edwards L, Revill KP, Drake D, Hobbs G, Buetefisch CM. Intensity-Dependent Effects of Low-Frequency Subthreshold rTMS on Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Elderly Participants: A Randomized Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2024:15459683241292615. [PMID: 39462433 DOI: 10.1177/15459683241292615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) protocols targeting primary motor cortex (M1) are used in rehabilitation of neurological diseases for their therapeutic potential, safety, and tolerability. Although lower intensity LF-rTMS can modulate M1 neurophysiology, results are variable, and a systematic assessment of its dose effect is lacking. OBJECTIVES To determine the dose-response of LF-rTMS on stimulated and non-stimulated M1. METHODS In a sham-controlled randomized double-blind crossover study the effect of LF-TMS protocols were determined in 20 right-handed older healthy participants. In 3 sessions, 1 Hz rTMS at 80% (rTMS80), 90% (rTMS90) of motor threshold or sham stimulation were applied to left upper extremity M1. Outcome measures were curve parameters of the stimulus-response curve (maximum motor evoked potential [MEPMAX], slope and the intensity to evoke 50% MEPMAX), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). RESULTS Within LF-rTMS sessions, rTMS90, increased MEPMAX in the stimulated M1. Furthermore, rTMS90, increased the slope in the non-stimulated M1. LF-rTMS effects on SICI were dependent on the participants' baseline SICI, hemisphere, and intensity of conditioning pulse. Finally, rTMS90 increased whereas rTMS80 decreased IHI, for both IHI directions. These changes were dependent on baseline IHI and hemisphere and were no longer significant when baseline IHI was accounted for. CONCLUSIONS Intensity of subthreshold LF-rTMS has differential effects on excitation and inhibition of stimulated and non-stimulated M1. The effects were small and were only demonstrated within the LF-rTMS sessions but were not different when compared to sham. rTMS related changes in SICI and IHI were dependent on baseline level. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT02544503, NCT01726218.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles Wischnewski
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lauren Edwards
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kate P Revill
- Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Daniel Drake
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Gerald Hobbs
- Department of Statistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Cathrin M Buetefisch
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Departments of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine and Radiology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilson MG, Riis TS, Kubanek J. Controlled ultrasonic interventions through the human skull. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1412921. [PMID: 38979100 PMCID: PMC11228146 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1412921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcranial focused ultrasound enables precise and non-invasive manipulations of deep brain circuits in humans, promising to provide safe and effective treatments of various neurological and mental health conditions. Ultrasound focused to deep brain targets can be used to modulate neural activity directly or localize the release of psychoactive drugs. However, these applications have been impeded by a key barrier-the human skull, which attenuates ultrasound strongly and unpredictably. To address this issue, we have developed an ultrasound-based approach that directly measures and compensates for the ultrasound attenuation by the skull. No additional skull imaging, simulations, assumptions, or free parameters are necessary; the method measures the attenuation directly by emitting a pulse of ultrasound from an array on one side of the head and measuring with an array on the opposite side. Here, we apply this emerging method to two primary future uses-neuromodulation and local drug release. Specifically, we show that the correction enables effective stimulation of peripheral nerves and effective release of propofol from nanoparticle carriers through an ex vivo human skull. Neither application was effective without the correction. Moreover, the effects show the expected dose-response relationship and targeting specificity. This article highlights the need for precise control of ultrasound intensity within the skull and provides a direct and practical approach for addressing this lingering barrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Wilson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Thomas S Riis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Jan Kubanek
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Smet S, Int-Veen I, Vanhollebeke G, Pulopulos MM, Barth B, Pasche S, Baeken C, Nuerk HC, Plewnia C, Nieratschker V, Jochen Fallgatter A, Ehlis AC, Vanderhasselt MA, Rosenbaum D. Trait-dependent effects of theta burst stimulation after psychosocial stress: a sham-controlled study in healthy individuals. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 162:235-247. [PMID: 38556367 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies suggest that theta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) might be a promising approach to modulate stress-reactive rumination and the associated psychophysiological stress response. Crucially, individuals showing higher levels of trait rumination might benefit more from prefrontal stimulation. METHODS In this sham-controlled study, 127 healthy individuals, with varying ruminative tendencies, received a single-session of intermittent TBS (iTBS), continuous TBS (cTBS) or sham TBS (sTBS) over the left DLPFC before being confronted with a Trier Social Stress Test. RESULTS Results showed significant TBS effects on salivary cortisol as a function of trait rumination. cTBS, as compared to sTBS and iTBS, resulted in an attenuated stress-induced cortisol response in high compared to low trait ruminators. Although independent of trait rumination levels, cTBS showed positive effects on stress-related changes in mood and, both cTBS and iTBS (versus sham) presented an enhanced heart rate recovery following the stressor. We found no evidence for (trait rumination-dependent) TBS effects on stress-reactive rumination, negative affect, subjective stress or heart rate variability. CONCLUSIONS cTBS shows beneficial effects on certain measures of stress, especially in high trait ruminators. SIGNIFICANCE These findings highlight the importance of accounting for individual differences when examining TBS effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie De Smet
- Department of Head and Skin, Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium; Brain Stimulation and Cognition (BSC) Lab, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Isabell Int-Veen
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Gert Vanhollebeke
- Department of Head and Skin, Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Belgium; Medical Imaging and Signal Processing (MEDISIP) Group, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matias M Pulopulos
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Beatrix Barth
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Germany
| | - Sarah Pasche
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Germany
| | - Chris Baeken
- Department of Head and Skin, Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital (UZBrussel), Brussels, Belgium; Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Christian Plewnia
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Germany
| | - Vanessa Nieratschker
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Germany
| | - Andreas Jochen Fallgatter
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Germany
| | - Ann-Christine Ehlis
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Germany
| | - Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
- Department of Head and Skin, Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium
| | - David Rosenbaum
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Y, Zhao J, Tang Z, Hsien Y, Han K, Shan L, Zhang X, Zhang H. Prolonged intermittent theta burst stimulation for post-stroke aphasia: protocol of a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1348862. [PMID: 38725649 PMCID: PMC11079432 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1348862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Post-stroke aphasia (PSA) is one of the most devastating symptoms after stroke, yet limited treatment options are available. Prolonged intermittent theta burst stimulation (piTBS) is a promising therapy for PSA. However, its efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to investigate the efficacy of piTBS over the left supplementary motor area (SMA) in improving language function for PSA patients and further explore the mechanism of language recovery. Methods This is a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial. A total of 30 PSA patients will be randomly allocated to receive either piTBS stimulation or sham stimulation for 15 sessions over a period of 3 weeks. The primary outcome is the Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) changes after treatment. The secondary outcomes include The Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39 g), resting-state electroencephalogram (resting-state EEG), Event-related potentials (ERP), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). These outcome measures are assessed before treatment, after treatment, and at 4-weeks follow up. This study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR23000203238). Discussion This study protocol is promising for improving language in PSA patients. Resting-state EEG, ERP, and blood examination can be used to explore the neural mechanisms of PSA treatment with piTBS. Clinical trial registration https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, ChiCTR2300074533.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Liu
- School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jingdu Zhao
- School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqing Tang
- School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yikuang Hsien
- School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Kaiyue Han
- School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Shan
- School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaonian Zhang
- School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goldenkoff ER, Deluisi JA, Destiny DP, Lee TG, Michon KJ, Brissenden JA, Taylor SF, Polk TA, Vesia M. The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1198222. [PMID: 37954875 PMCID: PMC10637360 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1198222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in neuroscience and clinical settings to modulate human cortical activity. The effects of TMS on neural activity depend on the excitability of specific neural populations at the time of stimulation. Accordingly, the brain state at the time of stimulation may influence the persistent effects of repetitive TMS on distal brain activity and associated behaviors. We applied intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to a region in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) associated with grasp control to evaluate the interaction between stimulation and brain state. Across two experiments, we demonstrate the immediate responses of motor cortex activity and motor performance to state-dependent parietal stimulation. We randomly assigned 72 healthy adult participants to one of three TMS intervention groups, followed by electrophysiological measures with TMS and behavioral measures. Participants in the first group received iTBS to PPC while performing a grasping task concurrently. Participants in the second group received iTBS to PPC while in a task-free, resting state. A third group of participants received iTBS to a parietal region outside the cortical grasping network while performing a grasping task concurrently. We compared changes in motor cortical excitability and motor performance in the three stimulation groups within an hour of each intervention. We found that parietal stimulation during a behavioral manipulation that activates the cortical grasping network increased downstream motor cortical excitability and improved motor performance relative to stimulation during rest. We conclude that constraining the brain state with a behavioral task during brain stimulation has the potential to optimize plasticity induction in cortical circuit mechanisms that mediate movement processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph A. Deluisi
- School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Danielle P. Destiny
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Taraz G. Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Katherine J. Michon
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - James A. Brissenden
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Stephan F. Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Thad A. Polk
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Michael Vesia
- School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gonterman F. A Systematic Review Assessing Patient-Related Predictors of Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2023; 19:565-577. [PMID: 36919097 PMCID: PMC10008378 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s388164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The safety and efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) is well established. However, it is not well understood which patient-related factors are associated with a more robust antidepressant response. Identifying predictive factors for therapeutic response to TMS treatment in depression will guide clinicians in patient selection. Methods By systematic review of clinical trial data, the current study aims to identify and analyze reported patient-specific predictors of response to an acute course of TMS treatment for MDD. PubMed was searched for randomized controlled trials of TMS for patients with depression. Studies were appraised for risk of bias using components recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Results TMS data were available from 375 studies, 18 of which were included in this review. Treatment response is inversely associated with treatment refractoriness and age. Conclusion Inadequate sample size and large heterogeneity in study parameters among clinical trials limit any strong conclusions from being drawn; nonetheless, despite these limitations, there is mounting evidence, which points to age and treatment refractoriness as candidate variables for predicting clinical outcome. Implications of these findings for treatment of MDD are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Gonterman
- Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Counseling & Clinical Psychology, Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fleury L, Koch PJ, Wessel MJ, Bonvin C, San Millan D, Constantin C, Vuadens P, Adolphsen J, Cadic Melchior A, Brügger J, Beanato E, Ceroni M, Menoud P, De Leon Rodriguez D, Zufferey V, Meyer NH, Egger P, Harquel S, Popa T, Raffin E, Girard G, Thiran JP, Vaney C, Alvarez V, Turlan JL, Mühl A, Léger B, Morishita T, Micera S, Blanke O, Van De Ville D, Hummel FC. Toward individualized medicine in stroke—The TiMeS project: Protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke. Front Neurol 2022; 13:939640. [PMID: 36226086 PMCID: PMC9549862 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.939640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite recent improvements, complete motor recovery occurs in <15% of stroke patients. To improve the therapeutic outcomes, there is a strong need to tailor treatments to each individual patient. However, there is a lack of knowledge concerning the precise neuronal mechanisms underlying the degree and course of motor recovery and its individual differences, especially in the view of brain network properties despite the fact that it became more and more clear that stroke is a network disorder. The TiMeS project is a longitudinal exploratory study aiming at characterizing stroke phenotypes of a large, representative stroke cohort through an extensive, multi-modal and multi-domain evaluation. The ultimate goal of the study is to identify prognostic biomarkers allowing to predict the individual degree and course of motor recovery and its underlying neuronal mechanisms paving the way for novel interventions and treatment stratification for the individual patients. A total of up to 100 patients will be assessed at 4 timepoints over the first year after the stroke: during the first (T1) and third (T2) week, then three (T3) and twelve (T4) months after stroke onset. To assess underlying mechanisms of recovery with a focus on network analyses and brain connectivity, we will apply synergistic state-of-the-art systems neuroscience methods including functional, diffusion, and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electrophysiological evaluation based on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coupled with electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG). In addition, an extensive, multi-domain neuropsychological evaluation will be performed at each timepoint, covering all sensorimotor and cognitive domains. This project will significantly add to the understanding of underlying mechanisms of motor recovery with a strong focus on the interactions between the motor and other cognitive domains and multimodal network analyses. The population-based, multi-dimensional dataset will serve as a basis to develop biomarkers to predict outcome and promote personalized stratification toward individually tailored treatment concepts using neuro-technologies, thus paving the way toward personalized precision medicine approaches in stroke rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Fleury
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Philipp J. Koch
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Maximilian J. Wessel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Julius-Maximilians-University, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andéol Cadic Melchior
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Julia Brügger
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Elena Beanato
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Martino Ceroni
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Pauline Menoud
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Diego De Leon Rodriguez
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Valérie Zufferey
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie H. Meyer
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, INX and BMI, EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Philip Egger
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Sylvain Harquel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Traian Popa
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Estelle Raffin
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Gabriel Girard
- CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Philippe Thiran
- CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Andreas Mühl
- Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | | | - Takuya Morishita
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Silvestro Micera
- The Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational Neuroengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olaf Blanke
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, INX and BMI, EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dimitri Van De Ville
- CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Medical Image Processing Lab, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Friedhelm C. Hummel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), EPFL, Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX and BMI, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
- Clinical Neuroscience, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Friedhelm C. Hummel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koch PJ, Park CH, Girard G, Beanato E, Egger P, Evangelista GG, Lee J, Wessel MJ, Morishita T, Koch G, Thiran JP, Guggisberg AG, Rosso C, Kim YH, Hummel FC. The structural connectome and motor recovery after stroke: predicting natural recovery. Brain 2021; 144:2107-2119. [PMID: 34237143 PMCID: PMC8370413 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Stroke patients vary considerably in terms of outcomes: some patients present 'natural' recovery proportional to their initial impairment (fitters), while others do not (non-fitters). Thus, a key challenge in stroke rehabilitation is to identify individual recovery potential to make personalized decisions for neuro-rehabilitation, obviating the 'one-size-fits-all' approach. This goal requires (i) the prediction of individual courses of recovery in the acute stage; and (ii) an understanding of underlying neuronal network mechanisms. 'Natural' recovery is especially variable in severely impaired patients, underscoring the special clinical importance of prediction for this subgroup. Fractional anisotropy connectomes based on individual tractography of 92 patients were analysed 2 weeks after stroke (TA) and their changes to 3 months after stroke (TC - TA). Motor impairment was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FMUE) scale. Support vector machine classifiers were trained to separate patients with natural recovery from patients without natural recovery based on their whole-brain structural connectomes and to define their respective underlying network patterns, focusing on severely impaired patients (FMUE < 20). Prediction accuracies were cross-validated internally, in one independent dataset and generalized in two independent datasets. The initial connectome 2 weeks after stroke was capable of segregating fitters from non-fitters, most importantly among severely impaired patients (TA: accuracy = 0.92, precision = 0.93). Secondary analyses studying recovery-relevant network characteristics based on the selected features revealed (i) relevant differences between networks contributing to recovery at 2 weeks and network changes over time (TC - TA); and (ii) network properties specific to severely impaired patients. Important features included the parietofrontal motor network including the intraparietal sulcus, premotor and primary motor cortices and beyond them also attentional, somatosensory or multimodal areas (e.g. the insula), strongly underscoring the importance of whole-brain connectome analyses for better predicting and understanding recovery from stroke. Computational approaches based on structural connectomes allowed the individual prediction of natural recovery 2 weeks after stroke onset, especially in the difficult to predict group of severely impaired patients, and identified the relevant underlying neuronal networks. This information will permit patients to be stratified into different recovery groups in clinical settings and will pave the way towards personalized precision neurorehabilitative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp J Koch
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Chang-Hyun Park
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
| | - Gabriel Girard
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
- CIBM Center for BioMedical Imaging, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Elena Beanato
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
| | - Philip Egger
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
| | - Giorgia Giulia Evangelista
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
| | - Jungsoo Lee
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 06351 Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Maximilian J Wessel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
| | - Takuya Morishita
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Non Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, Department of Behavioral and Clinical Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179 Rome, Italy
| | - Jean-Philippe Thiran
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
- CIBM Center for BioMedical Imaging, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Adrian G Guggisberg
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Rosso
- Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 UMR S 10 27, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, France; AP-HP, Stroke Unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Yun-Hee Kim
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 06351 Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Friedhelm C Hummel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
- Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva Medical School, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kearney-Ramos T, Haney M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2021; 109:110290. [PMID: 33677045 PMCID: PMC9165758 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The expanding legalization of cannabis across the United States is associated with increases in cannabis use, and accordingly, an increase in the number and severity of individuals with cannabis use disorder (CUD). The lack of FDA-approved pharmacotherapies and modest efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions means that many of those who seek treatment for CUD relapse within the first few months. Consequently, there is a pressing need for innovative, evidence-based treatment development for CUD. Preliminary evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be a novel, non-invasive therapeutic neuromodulation tool for the treatment of a variety of substance use disorders (SUDs), including recently receiving FDA clearance (August 2020) for use as a smoking cessation aid in tobacco cigarette smokers. However, the potential of rTMS for CUD has not yet been reviewed. This paper provides a primer on therapeutic neuromodulation techniques for SUDs, with a particular focus on reviewing the current status of rTMS research in people who use cannabis. Lastly, future directions are proposed for rTMS treatment development in CUD, with suggestions for study design parameters and clinical endpoints based on current gold-standard practices for therapeutic neuromodulation research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonisha Kearney-Ramos
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Margaret Haney
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA,Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Freedberg M, Cunningham CA, Fioriti CM, Murillo J, Reeves JA, Taylor PA, Sarlls JE, Wassermann EM. Multiple parietal pathways are associated with rTMS-induced hippocampal network enhancement and episodic memory changes. Neuroimage 2021; 237:118199. [PMID: 34033914 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the inferior parietal cortex (IPC) increases resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the hippocampus with the precuneus and other posterior cortical areas and causes proportional improvement of episodic memory. The anatomical pathway(s) responsible for the propagation of these effects from the IPC is unknown and may not be direct. In order to assess the relative contributions of candidate pathways from the IPC to the MTL via the parahippocampal cortex and precuneus, to the effects of rTMS on rsFC and memory improvement, we used diffusion tensor imaging to measure the extent to which individual differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) in these pathways accounted for individual differences in response. FA in the IPC-parahippocampal pathway and several MTL pathways predicted changes in rsFC. FA in both parahippocampal and hippocampal pathways was related to changes in episodic, but not procedural, memory. These results implicate pathways to the MTL in the enhancing effect of parietal rTMS on hippocampal rsFC and memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Freedberg
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| | - Catherine A Cunningham
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA
| | - Cynthia M Fioriti
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| | - Jorge Murillo
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| | - Jack A Reeves
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| | - Paul A Taylor
- Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | | | - Eric M Wassermann
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goldsworthy MR, Hordacre B, Rothwell JC, Ridding MC. Effects of rTMS on the brain: is there value in variability? Cortex 2021; 139:43-59. [PMID: 33827037 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The ability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to non-invasively induce neuroplasticity in the human cortex has opened exciting possibilities for its application in both basic and clinical research. Changes in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation has so far provided a convenient model for exploring the neurophysiology of rTMS effects on the brain, influencing the ways in which these stimulation protocols have been applied therapeutically. However, a growing number of studies have reported large inter-individual variability in the mean MEP response to rTMS, raising legitimate questions about the usefulness of this model for guiding therapy. Although the increasing application of different neuroimaging approaches has made it possible to probe rTMS-induced neuroplasticity outside the motor cortex to measure changes in neural activity that impact other aspects of human behaviour, the high variability of rTMS effects on these measurements remains an important issue for the field to address. In this review, we seek to move away from the conventional facilitation/inhibition dichotomy that permeates much of the rTMS literature, presenting a non-standard approach for measuring rTMS-induced neuroplasticity. We consider the evidence that rTMS is able to modulate an individual's moment-to-moment variability of neural activity, and whether this could have implications for guiding the therapeutic application of rTMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell R Goldsworthy
- Lifespan Human Neurophysiology Group, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia; Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Brenton Hordacre
- Innovation, IMPlementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - John C Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael C Ridding
- Innovation, IMPlementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bukowski H, Tik M, Silani G, Ruff C, Windischberger C, Lamm C. When differences matter: rTMS/fMRI reveals how differences in dispositional empathy translate to distinct neural underpinnings of self-other distinction in empathy. Cortex 2020; 128:143-161. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
14
|
Individual differences in local functional brain connectivity affect TMS effects on behavior. Sci Rep 2020; 10:10422. [PMID: 32591568 PMCID: PMC7320140 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67162-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Behavioral effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) often show substantial differences between subjects. One factor that might contribute to these inter-individual differences is the interaction of current brain states with the effects of local brain network perturbation. The aim of the current study was to identify brain regions whose connectivity before and following right parietal perturbation affects individual behavioral effects during a visuospatial target detection task. 20 subjects participated in an fMRI experiment where their brain hemodynamic response was measured during resting state, and then during a visuospatial target detection task following 1 Hz rTMS and sham stimulation. To select a parsimonious set of associated brain regions, an elastic net analysis was used in combination with a whole-brain voxel-wise functional connectivity analysis. TMS-induced changes in accuracy were significantly correlated with the pattern of functional connectivity during the task state following TMS. The functional connectivity of the left superior temporal, angular, and precentral gyri was identified as key explanatory variable for the individual behavioral TMS effects. Our results suggest that the brain must reach an appropriate state in which right parietal TMS can induce improvements in visual target detection. The ability to reach this state appears to vary between individuals.
Collapse
|
15
|
Jost LB, Pestalozzi MI, Cazzoli D, Mouthon M, Müri RM, Annoni JM. Effects of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Over the Left Dlpfc on Mother Tongue and Second Language Production In Late Bilinguals: A Behavioral and ERP Study. Brain Topogr 2020; 33:504-518. [DOI: 10.1007/s10548-020-00779-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
16
|
Vanbellingen T, Pastore-Wapp M, Kübel S, Nyffeler T, Schüpfer AC, Kiefer C, Zizlsperger L, Lutz K, Luft AR, Walther S, Bohlhalter S. Interhemispheric facilitation of gesturing: A combined theta burst stimulation and diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:457-463. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
17
|
Douw L, Quaak M, Fitzsimmons SM, de Wit SJ, van der Werf YD, van den Heuvel OA, Vriend C. Static and dynamic network properties of the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation target predict changes in emotion regulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:318-326. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
|
18
|
Freedberg M, Reeves JA, Toader AC, Hermiller MS, Kim E, Haubenberger D, Cheung YK, Voss JL, Wassermann EM. Optimizing Hippocampal-Cortical Network Modulation via Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Dose-Finding Study Using the Continual Reassessment Method. Neuromodulation 2019; 23:366-372. [PMID: 31667947 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can cause potentially useful changes in brain functional connectivity (FC), but the number of treatment sessions required is unknown. We applied the continual reassessment method (CRM), a Bayesian, adaptive, dose-finding procedure to a rTMS paradigm in an attempt to answer this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS The sample size was predetermined at 15 subjects and the cohort size was set with three individuals (i.e., five total cohorts). In a series of consecutive daily sessions, we delivered rTMS to the left posterior parietal cortex and measured resting-state FC with fMRI in a predefined hippocampal network in the left hemisphere. The session number for each successive cohort was determined by the CRM algorithm. We set a response criterion of a 0.028 change in FC between the hippocampus and the parietal cortex, which was equal to the increase seen in 87.5% of participants in a previous study using five sessions. RESULTS A ≥criterion change was observed in 9 of 15 participants. The CRM indicated that greater than four sessions are required to produce the criterion change reliably in future studies. CONCLUSIONS The CRM can be adapted for rTMS dose finding when a reliable outcome measure, such as FC, is available. The minimum effective dose needed to produce a criterion increase in FC in our hippocampal network of interest at 87.5% efficacy was estimated to be greater than four sessions. This study is the first demonstration of a Bayesian, adaptive method to explore a rTMS parameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Freedberg
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Behavioral Neurology Unit, MD, USA.,Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jack A Reeves
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Behavioral Neurology Unit, MD, USA
| | - Andrew C Toader
- Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA
| | - Molly S Hermiller
- Northwestern University Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Eunhee Kim
- Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Dietrich Haubenberger
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Behavioral Neurology Unit, MD, USA
| | - Ying Kuen Cheung
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joel L Voss
- Northwestern University Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Ken and Ruth Davee Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Eric M Wassermann
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Behavioral Neurology Unit, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guggisberg AG, Koch PJ, Hummel FC, Buetefisch CM. Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:1098-1124. [PMID: 31082786 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Stroke has long been regarded as focal disease with circumscribed damage leading to neurological deficits. However, advances in methods for assessing the human brain and in statistics have enabled new tools for the examination of the consequences of stroke on brain structure and function. Thereby, it has become evident that stroke has impact on the entire brain and its network properties and can therefore be considered as a network disease. The present review first gives an overview of current methodological opportunities and pitfalls for assessing stroke-induced changes and reorganization in the human brain. We then summarize principles of plasticity after stroke that have emerged from the assessment of networks. Thereby, it is shown that neurological deficits do not only arise from focal tissue damage but also from local and remote changes in white-matter tracts and in neural interactions among wide-spread networks. Similarly, plasticity and clinical improvements are associated with specific compensatory structural and functional patterns of neural network interactions. Innovative treatment approaches have started to target such network patterns to enhance recovery. Network assessments to predict treatment response and to individualize rehabilitation is a promising way to enhance specific treatment effects and overall outcome after stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian G Guggisberg
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Philipp J Koch
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland; Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Valais (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland
| | - Friedhelm C Hummel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland; Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Valais (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, 1951 Sion, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cathrin M Buetefisch
- Depts of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Comparison of Neuroplastic Responses to Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Subacute Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99:862-872.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
21
|
Schulz R, Park E, Lee J, Chang WH, Lee A, Kim YH, Hummel FC. Interactions Between the Corticospinal Tract and Premotor-Motor Pathways for Residual Motor Output After Stroke. Stroke 2017; 48:2805-2811. [PMID: 28904231 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.016834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Brain imaging has continuously enhanced our understanding how different brain networks contribute to motor recovery after stroke. However, the present models are still incomplete and do not fit for every patient. The interaction between the degree of damage of the corticospinal tract (CST) and of corticocortical motor connections, that is, the influence of the microstructural state of one connection on the importance of another has been largely neglected. METHODS Applying diffusion-weighted imaging and probabilistic tractography, we investigated cross-network interactions between the integrity of ipsilesional CST and ipsilesional corticocortical motor pathways for variance in residual motor outcome in 53 patients with subacute stroke. RESULTS The main finding was a significant interaction between the CST and corticocortical connections between the primary motor and ventral premotor cortex in relation to residual motor output. More specifically, the data indicate that the microstructural state of the connection primary motor-ventral premotor cortex plays only a role in patients with significant damage to the CST. In patients with slightly affected CST, this connection did not explain a relevant amount of variance in motor outcome. CONCLUSIONS The present data show that patients with stroke with different degree of CST disruption differ in their dependency on structural premotor-motor connections for residual motor output. This finding might have important implications for future research on recovery prediction models and on responses to treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Schulz
- From the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (R.S.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., W.H.C., Y.-H.K.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea (E.P.); Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., A.L., Y.-H.K.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (F.C.H.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), CRR (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation), Sion, Switzerland (F.C.H.); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland (F.C.H.)
| | - Eunhee Park
- From the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (R.S.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., W.H.C., Y.-H.K.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea (E.P.); Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., A.L., Y.-H.K.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (F.C.H.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), CRR (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation), Sion, Switzerland (F.C.H.); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland (F.C.H.)
| | - Jungsoo Lee
- From the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (R.S.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., W.H.C., Y.-H.K.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea (E.P.); Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., A.L., Y.-H.K.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (F.C.H.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), CRR (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation), Sion, Switzerland (F.C.H.); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland (F.C.H.)
| | - Won Hyuk Chang
- From the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (R.S.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., W.H.C., Y.-H.K.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea (E.P.); Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., A.L., Y.-H.K.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (F.C.H.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), CRR (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation), Sion, Switzerland (F.C.H.); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland (F.C.H.)
| | - Ahee Lee
- From the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (R.S.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., W.H.C., Y.-H.K.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea (E.P.); Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., A.L., Y.-H.K.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (F.C.H.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), CRR (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation), Sion, Switzerland (F.C.H.); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland (F.C.H.)
| | - Yun-Hee Kim
- From the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (R.S.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., W.H.C., Y.-H.K.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea (E.P.); Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., A.L., Y.-H.K.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (F.C.H.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), CRR (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation), Sion, Switzerland (F.C.H.); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland (F.C.H.)
| | - Friedhelm C Hummel
- From the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (R.S.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., W.H.C., Y.-H.K.); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea (E.P.); Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.L., A.L., Y.-H.K.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (F.C.H.); Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), CRR (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation), Sion, Switzerland (F.C.H.); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland (F.C.H.).
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Massie CL, White C, Pruit K, Freel A, Staley K, Backes M. Influence of Motor Cortex Stimulation During Motor Training on Neuroplasticity as a Potential Therapeutic Intervention. J Mot Behav 2017; 49:111-116. [DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1271298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal L. Massie
- Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Caylen White
- Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Katie Pruit
- Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Aubrey Freel
- Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Kaylin Staley
- Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Morgan Backes
- Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cazzoli D, Chechlacz M. A matter of hand: Causal links between hand dominance, structural organization of fronto-parietal attention networks, and variability in behavioural responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cortex 2017; 86:230-246. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2015] [Revised: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
24
|
Variation in left posterior parietal-motor cortex interhemispheric facilitation following right parietal continuous theta-burst stimulation in healthy adults. Neuroscience 2016; 330:229-35. [PMID: 27267243 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Revised: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 05/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Spatial neglect is modeled on an imbalance of interhemispheric inhibition (IHI); however evidence is emerging that it may not explain neglect in all cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the IHI imbalance model of visual neglect in healthy adults, using paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to probe excitability of projections from posterior parietal cortex (PPC) to contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) bilaterally. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interossei and facilitation was determined as ratio of conditioned to non-conditioned MEP amplitude. A laterality index reflecting the balance of excitability between the two hemispheres was calculated. A temporal order judgment task (TOJ) assessed visual attention. Continuous theta-burst stimulation was used to transiently suppress right parietal cortex activity and the effect on laterality and judgment task measured, along with associations between baseline and post stimulation measures. Stimulation had conflicting results on laterality, with most participants demonstrating an effect in the negative direction with no decrement in the TOJ task. Correlation analysis suggests a strong association between laterality direction and degree of facilitation of left PPC-to right M1 following stimulation (r=.902), with larger MEP facilitation at baseline demonstrating greater reduction (r=-.908). Findings indicate there was relative balance between the cortices at baseline but right PPC suppression did not evoke left PPC facilitation in most participants, contrary to the IHI imbalance model. Left M1 facilitation prior to stimulation may predict an individual's response to continuous theta-burst stimulation of right PPC.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wilson MT, St George L. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Call for Better Data. Front Neural Circuits 2016; 10:57. [PMID: 27536222 PMCID: PMC4971102 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus T Wilson
- School of Engineering, University of Waikato Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Lynley St George
- School of Engineering, University of Waikato Hamilton, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nicolo P, Fargier R, Laganaro M, Guggisberg AG. Neurobiological Correlates of Inhibition of the Right Broca Homolog during New-Word Learning. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10:371. [PMID: 27516735 PMCID: PMC4963391 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has demonstrated beneficial effects on motor learning. It would be important to obtain a similar enhancement for verbal learning. However, previous studies have mostly assessed short-term effects of rTMS on language performance and the effect on learning is largely unknown. This study examined whether an inhibition of the right Broca homolog has long-term impact on neural processes underlying the acquisition of new words in healthy individuals. Sixteen young participants trained a new-word learning paradigm with rare, mostly unknown objects and their corresponding words immediately after continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) or sham stimulation of right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in a cross-over design. Neural effects were assessed with electroencephalography (EEG) source power analyses during the naming task as well as coherence analyses at rest 1 day before and after training. Inhibition of the right Broca homolog did not affect new word learning performance at the group level. Behavioral and neural responses to cTBS were variable across participants and were associated with the magnitude of resting-state alpha-band coherence between the stimulated area and the rest of the brain before stimulation. Only participants with high intrinsic alpha-band coherence between the stimulated area and the rest of the brain before stimulation showed the expected inhibition during naming and greater learning performance. In conclusion, our study confirms that cTBS can induce lasting modulations of neural processes which are associated with learning, but the effect depends on the individual network state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Nicolo
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital GenevaGeneva, Switzerland; Laboratory of Cognitive Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medical School, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Fargier
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marina Laganaro
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Adrian G Guggisberg
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital GenevaGeneva, Switzerland; Laboratory of Cognitive Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medical School, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Carrette S, Boon P, Dekeyser C, Klooster DCW, Carrette E, Meurs A, Raedt R, Baeken C, Vanhove C, Aldenkamp AP, Vonck K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. Expert Rev Neurother 2016; 16:1093-110. [DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2016.1197119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
28
|
Hartwright CE, Hardwick RM, Apperly IA, Hansen PC. Resting state morphology predicts the effect of theta burst stimulation in false belief reasoning. Hum Brain Mapp 2016; 37:3502-14. [PMID: 27195942 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Revised: 04/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
When required to represent a perspective that conflicts with one's own, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) suggests that the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (rvlPFC) supports the inhibition of that conflicting self-perspective. The present task dissociated inhibition of self-perspective from other executive control processes by contrasting belief reasoning-a cognitive state where the presence of conflicting perspectives was manipulated-with a conative desire state wherein no systematic conflict existed. Linear modeling was used to examine the effect of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to rvlPFC on participants' reaction times in belief and desire reasoning. It was anticipated that cTBS applied to rvlPFC would affect belief but not desire reasoning, by modulating activity in the Ventral Attention System (VAS). We further anticipated that this effect would be mediated by functional connectivity within this network, which was identified using resting state fMRI and an unbiased model-free approach. Simple reaction-time analysis failed to detect an effect of cTBS. However, by additionally modeling individual measures from within the stimulated network, the hypothesized effect of cTBS to belief (but, importantly, not desire) reasoning was demonstrated. Structural morphology within the stimulated region, rvlPFC, and right temporoparietal junction were demonstrated to underlie this effect. These data provide evidence that inconsistencies found with cTBS can be mediated by the composition of the functional network that is being stimulated. We suggest that the common claim that this network constitutes the VAS explains the effect of cTBS to this network on false belief reasoning. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3502-3514, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte E Hartwright
- Aston Brain Centre, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, United Kingdom.,Centre for Behavioural Brain Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Robert M Hardwick
- Centre for Behavioural Brain Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ian A Apperly
- Centre for Behavioural Brain Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Peter C Hansen
- Centre for Behavioural Brain Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Royter V, Gharabaghi A. Brain State-Dependent Closed-Loop Modulation of Paired Associative Stimulation Controlled by Sensorimotor Desynchronization. Front Cell Neurosci 2016; 10:115. [PMID: 27242429 PMCID: PMC4861730 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pairing peripheral electrical stimulation (ES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) increases corticospinal excitability when applied with a specific temporal pattern. When the two stimulation techniques are applied separately, motor imagery (MI)-related oscillatory modulation amplifies both ES-related cortical effects-sensorimotor event-related desynchronization (ERD), and TMS-induced peripheral responses-motor-evoked potentials (MEP). However, the influence of brain self-regulation on the associative pairing of these stimulation techniques is still unclear. OBJECTIVE The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of MI-related ERD during associative ES and TMS on subsequent corticospinal excitability. METHOD The paired application of functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscle and subsequent single-pulse TMS (110% resting motor threshold (RMT)) of the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) was controlled by beta-band (16-22 Hz) ERD during MI of finger extension and applied within a brain-machine interface environment in six healthy subjects. Neural correlates were probed by acquiring the stimulus-response curve (SRC) of both MEP peak-to-peak amplitude and area under the curve (AUC) before and after the intervention. RESULT The application of approximately 150 pairs of associative FES and TMS resulted in a significant increase of MEP amplitudes and AUC, indicating that the induced increase of corticospinal excitability was mediated by the recruitment of additional neuronal pools. MEP increases were brain state-dependent and correlated with beta-band ERD, but not with the background EDC muscle activity; this finding was independent of the FES intensity applied. CONCLUSION These results could be relevant for developing closed-loop therapeutic approaches such as the application of brain state-dependent, paired associative stimulation (PAS) in the context of neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladislav Royter
- Division of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery, and Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Alireza Gharabaghi
- Division of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery, and Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Structural Organization of the Corpus Callosum Predicts Attentional Shifts after Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation. J Neurosci 2016; 35:15353-68. [PMID: 26586822 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2610-15.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in healthy participants has been shown to trigger a significant rightward shift in the spatial allocation of visual attention, temporarily mimicking spatial deficits observed in neglect. In contrast, rTMS applied over the left PPC triggers a weaker or null attentional shift. However, large interindividual differences in responses to rTMS have been reported. Studies measuring changes in brain activation suggest that the effects of rTMS may depend on both interhemispheric and intrahemispheric interactions between cortical loci controlling visual attention. Here, we investigated whether variability in the structural organization of human white matter pathways subserving visual attention, as assessed by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and tractography, could explain interindividual differences in the effects of rTMS. Most participants showed a rightward shift in the allocation of spatial attention after rTMS over the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS), but the size of this effect varied largely across participants. Conversely, rTMS over the left IPS resulted in strikingly opposed individual responses, with some participants responding with rightward and some with leftward attentional shifts. We demonstrate that microstructural and macrostructural variability within the corpus callosum, consistent with differential effects on cross-hemispheric interactions, predicts both the extent and the direction of the response to rTMS. Together, our findings suggest that the corpus callosum may have a dual inhibitory and excitatory function in maintaining the interhemispheric dynamics that underlie the allocation of spatial attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) controls allocation of attention across left versus right visual fields. Damage to this area results in neglect, characterized by a lack of spatial awareness of the side of space contralateral to the brain injury. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the PPC is used to study cognitive mechanisms of spatial attention and to examine the potential of this technique to treat neglect. However, large individual differences in behavioral responses to stimulation have been reported. We demonstrate that the variability in the structural organization of the corpus callosum accounts for these differences. Our findings suggest novel dual mechanism of the corpus callosum function in spatial attention and have broader implications for the use of stimulation in neglect rehabilitation.
Collapse
|
32
|
Harvey M, Kerkhoff G. Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on attention: Current debates, cognitive studies and novel clinical applications. Neuropsychologia 2015; 74:1-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
33
|
Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability. Neural Plast 2015; 2015:578620. [PMID: 26167305 PMCID: PMC4488255 DOI: 10.1155/2015/578620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2015] [Accepted: 06/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has the
potential to enhance corticospinal excitability (CSE)
and subsequent motor learning. However, the effects of
iTBS following motor learning are unknown. The purpose
of the present study was to explore the effect of iTBS
on CSE and performance following motor learning.
Therefore twenty-four healthy participants practiced a
ballistic motor task for a total of 150 movements.
iTBS was subsequently applied to the trained motor
cortex (STIM group) or the vertex (SHAM group).
Performance and CSE were assessed before motor
learning and before and after iTBS. Training
significantly increased performance and CSE in both
groups. In STIM group participants, subsequent iTBS
significantly reduced motor performance with smaller
reductions in CSE. CSE changes as a result of motor
learning were negatively correlated with both the CSE
changes and performance changes as a result of iTBS.
No significant effects of iTBS were found for SHAM
group participants. We conclude that iTBS has the
potential to degrade prior motor learning as a
function of training-induced CSE changes. That means
the expected LTP-like effects of iTBS are reversed
following motor learning.
Collapse
|