Sleep does not enhance the recovery of deprived eye responses in developing visual cortex

Enriched binocular experience followed by sleep optimally restores binocular visual cortical responses in a mouse model of amblyopia

Studies of primary visual cortex have furthered our understanding of amblyopia, long-lasting visual impairment caused by imbalanced input from the two eyes during childhood, which is commonly treated by patching the dominant eye. However, the relative impacts of monocular vs. binocular visual experiences on recovery from amblyopia are unclear. Moreover, while sleep promotes visual cortex plasticity following loss of input from one eye, its role in recovering binocular visual function is unknown. Using monocular deprivation in juvenile male mice to model amblyopia, we compared recovery of cortical neurons' visual responses after identical-duration, identical-quality binocular or monocular visual experiences. We demonstrate that binocular experience is quantitatively superior in restoring binocular responses in visual cortex neurons. However, this recovery was seen only in freely-sleeping mice; post-experience sleep deprivation prevented functional recovery. Thus, both binocular visual experience and subsequent sleep help to optimally renormalize bV1 responses in a mouse model of amblyopia.

The formation of compensatory contextual fear memory in the absence of dorsal hippocampus does not change sleep architecture

Although the dorsal hippocampus (DH) plays an essential role in the consolidation of contextual fear-conditioned (CxFC) memory, this consolidation may also occur in the absence of DH. It is, however, not known if the development of a compensatory circuit for CxFC memory is time-dependent. The DH-dependent contextual fear memory influences sleep architecture, but whether the compensatory fear memory can influence sleep, is not known. Here, we have studied (a) the temporal progression of compensatory contextual fear memory in the absence of DH and (b) the influence of compensatory contextual fear memory on sleep architecture. Rats were surgically prepared for chronic polysomnographic recordings and drug injections in the DH. They were divided into four groups: DH-non-lesioned and fear-conditioned, DH-non-lesioned and non-fear-conditioned, DH-lesioned and fear-conditioned and DH-lesioned and non-fear-conditioned groups. The DH was lesioned with ibotenic acid. The animals were conditioned to contextual fear twice: 1^st training on Day 5 and testing on Day 6; 2^nd training on Day 10 and testing on Day 11. The DH-lesioned and fear-conditioned animals did not exhibit freezing response during the first testing but showed a robust freezing response when re-trained after a gap of three days. In addition, wakefulness and NREM sleep amount did not change, but REM sleep significantly decreased in the DH-dependent CxFC memory group. Interestingly, REM sleep did not decrease in the DH-independent CxFC memory group. Our findings suggest that the development of compensatory CxFC memory is a time-dependent process and the compensatory CxFC memory may not influence sleep architecture.

Sleep, synaptic homeostasis and neuronal firing rates

The synaptic homeostasis hypothesis (SHY) states that wake brings about a net overall increase in synaptic strength in many brain circuits that needs to be renormalized by sleep. I will review recent studies that were either specifically designed to test SHY or were interpreted accordingly, including several experiments that focused on changes in neuronal firing rates. I will emphasize that central to SHY is the idea that what is being regulated across the sleep/wake cycle is synaptic strength, not firing rate, and firing rate taken in isolation is not necessarily an adequate proxy for synaptic strength.

Sleep and synaptic plasticity in the developing and adult brain

Sleep is hypothesized to play an integral role in brain plasticity. This has traditionally been investigated using behavioral assays. In the last 10-15 years, studies combining sleep measurements with in vitro and in vivo models of synaptic plasticity have provided exciting new insights into how sleep alters synaptic strength. In addition, new theories have been proposed that integrate older ideas about sleep function and recent discoveries in the field of synaptic plasticity. There remain, however, important challenges and unanswered questions. For example, sleep does not appear to have a single effect on synaptic strength. An unbiased review of the literature indicates that the effects of sleep vary widely depending on ontogenetic stage, the type of waking experience (or stimulation protocols) that precede sleep and the type of neuronal synapse under examination. In this review, I discuss these key findings in the context of current theories that posit different roles for sleep in synaptic plasticity.

Organization and origin of spatial frequency maps in cat visual cortex

It remains controversial whether and how spatial frequency (SF) is represented tangentially in cat visual cortex. Several models were proposed, but there is no consensus. Worse still, some data indicate that the SF organization previously revealed by optical imaging techniques simply reflects non-stimulus-specific responses. Instead, stimulus-specific responses arise from the homogeneous distribution of geniculo-cortical afferents representing X and Y pathways. To clarify this, we developed a new imaging method allowing rapid stimulation with a wide range of SFs covering more than 6 octaves with only 0.2 octave resolution. A benefit of this method is to avoid error of high-pass filtering methods which systematically under-represent dominant selectivity features near pinwheel centers. We show unequivocally that SF is organized into maps in cat area 17 (A17) and area 18 (A18). The SF organization in each area displays a global anteroposterior SF gradient and local patches. Its layout is constrained to that of the orientation map, and it is suggested that both maps share a common functional architecture. A17 and A18 are bound at the transition zone by another SF gradient involving the geniculo-cortical and the callosal pathways. A model based on principal component analysis shows that SF maps integrate three different SF-dependent channels. Two of these reflect the segregated excitatory input from X and Y geniculate cells to A17 and A18. The third one conveys a specific combination of excitatory and suppressive inputs to the visual cortex. In a manner coherent with anatomical and electrophysiological data, it is interpreted as originating from a subtype of Y geniculate cells.

Activation of NMDA receptors is necessary for the recovery of cortical binocularity

Classic experiments have indicated that monocular deprivation (MD) for a few days during a critical period of development results in a decrease in the strength of connections mediating responses to the deprived eye, leading to a dramatic breakdown of cortical neuron binocularity. Despite the substantial functional change in the visual cortex, recovery from the effects of MD can be obtained if binocular vision is promptly restored. While great efforts have been made to elucidate the mechanisms regulating loss of deprived eye function, the mechanisms that underlie the recovery of cortical binocularity are poorly understood. Here, we examined whether activation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is required for the recovery of cortical binocularity by pharmacologically blocking the NMDAR using d,l-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic (APV). Ferrets (n = 10) were monocularly deprived for 6 days, and osmotic minipumps, filled with APV (5.6 mg/ml) or saline, were surgically implanted into the primary visual cortex. One day after surgery, the deprived eye was reopened, and the animals were allowed 24 h of binocular vision. Extracellular recordings showed that intracortical infusion of the NMDAR antagonist, APV, prevented recovery of cortical binocularity while preserving neuronal responsiveness. These findings provide an important new insight for a specific role of NMDARs in the recovery of cortical binocularity from the effects of MD.

Cortical firing and sleep homeostasis

The need to sleep grows with the duration of wakefulness and dissipates with time spent asleep, a process called sleep homeostasis. What are the consequences of staying awake on brain cells, and why is sleep needed? Surprisingly, we do not know whether the firing of cortical neurons is affected by how long an animal has been awake or asleep. Here, we found that after sustained wakefulness cortical neurons fire at higher frequencies in all behavioral states. During early NREM sleep after sustained wakefulness, periods of population activity (ON) are short, frequent, and associated with synchronous firing, while periods of neuronal silence are long and frequent. After sustained sleep, firing rates and synchrony decrease, while the duration of ON periods increases. Changes in firing patterns in NREM sleep correlate with changes in slow-wave activity, a marker of sleep homeostasis. Thus, the systematic increase of firing during wakefulness is counterbalanced by staying asleep.

Sleep function: current questions and new approaches

The mammalian brain oscillates through three distinct global activity states: wakefulness, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and REM sleep. The regulation and function of these 'vigilance' or 'behavioural' states can be investigated over a broad range of temporal and spatial scales and at different levels of functional organization, i.e. from gene expression to memory, in single neurons, cortical columns or the whole brain and organism. We summarize some basic questions that have arisen from recent approaches in the quest for the functions of sleep. Whereas traditionally sleep was viewed to be regulated through top-down control mechanisms, recent approaches have emphasized that sleep is emerging locally and regulated in a use-dependent (homeostatic) manner. Traditional markers of sleep homeostasis, such as the electroencephalogram slow-wave activity, have been linked to changes in connectivity and plasticity in local neuronal networks. Thus waking experience-induced local network changes may be sensed by the sleep homeostatic process and used to mediate sleep-dependent events, benefiting network stabilization and memory consolidation. Although many questions remain unanswered, the available data suggest that sleep function will best be understood by an analysis which integrates sleep's many functional levels with its local homeostatic regulation.

Mechanisms of sleep-dependent consolidation of cortical plasticity

Sleep is thought to consolidate changes in synaptic strength, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We investigated the cellular events involved in this process during ocular dominance plasticity (ODP)-a canonical form of in vivo cortical plasticity triggered by monocular deprivation (MD) and consolidated by sleep via undetermined, activity-dependent mechanisms. We find that sleep consolidates ODP primarily by strengthening cortical responses to nondeprived eye stimulation. Consolidation is inhibited by reversible, intracortical antagonism of NMDA receptors (NMDARs) or cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) during post-MD sleep. Consolidation is also associated with sleep-dependent increases in the activity of remodeling neurons and in the phosphorylation of proteins required for potentiation of glutamatergic synapses. These findings demonstrate that synaptic strengthening via NMDAR and PKA activity is a key step in sleep-dependent consolidation of ODP.

The non-benzodiazepine hypnotic zolpidem impairs sleep-dependent cortical plasticity

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The effects of hypnotics on sleep-dependent brain plasticity are unknown. We have shown that sleep enhances a canonical model of in vivo cortical plasticity, known as ocular dominance plasticity (ODP). We investigated the effects of 3 different classes of hypnotics on ODP.

DESIGN

Polysomnographic recordings were performed during the entire experiment (20 h). After a baseline sleep/wake recording (6 h), cats received 6 h of monocular deprivation (MD) followed by an i.p. injection of triazolam (1-10 mg/kg i.p.), zolpidem (10 mg/kg i.p.), ramelteon (0.1-1 mg/kg i.p.), or vehicle (DMSO i.p.). They were then allowed to sleep ad lib for 8 h, after which they were prepared for optical imaging of intrinsic cortical signals and single-unit electrophysiology.

SETTING

Basic neurophysiology laboratory

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Cats (male and female) in the critical period of visual development (postnatal days 28-41)

INTERVENTIONS

N/A.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Zolpidem reduced cortical plasticity by approximately 50% as assessed with optical imaging of intrinsic cortical signals. This was not due to abnormal sleep architecture because triazolam, which perturbed sleep architecture and sleep EEGs more profoundly than zolpidem, had no effect on plasticity. Ramelteon minimally altered sleep and had no effect on ODP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that alterations in sleep architecture do not necessarily lead to impairments in sleep function. Conversely, hypnotics that produce more "physiological" sleep based on polysomnography may impair critical brain processes, depending on their pharmacology.

Adult visual experience promotes recovery of primary visual cortex from long-term monocular deprivation

Prolonged visual deprivation from early childhood to maturity is believed to cause permanent visual impairment. However, there have been case reports of substantial improvement of binocular vision in human adults following lifelong visual impairment or deprivation. These observations, together with recent findings of adult ocular dominance plasticity in rodents, led us to re-examine whether adult primary visual cortex (V1) is capable of any recovery following long-term monocular deprivation starting in development. Using mice as a model, we find that monocular deprivation from early development to mature ages (well past the critical period) severely impaired binocular vision by reducing the amplitude of responses elicited by stimulation of the deprived eye. Surprisingly, we find little effect on nondeprived eye responses. Restoration of binocular vision in mature adults yields modest but significant improvement of visual responses in V1. Remarkably, we find that when binocular vision is followed by occlusion of the nondeprived eye, visual responses in V1 recover almost fully, as measured by visual evoked potential amplitude, spatial frequency threshold, and single-unit activity. We conclude that adult V1 can recover from long-term deprivation when provided with an optimal regimen of visual experience.