Visual cortical contributions to associative cerebellar learning

Layer 5 Circuits in V1 Differentially Control Visuomotor Behavior

Neocortical sensory areas are thought to act as distribution hubs, transmitting information about the external environment to downstream areas. Within primary visual cortex, various populations of pyramidal neurons (PNs) send axonal projections to distinct targets, suggesting multiple cellular networks may be independently engaged during behavior. We investigated whether PN subpopulations differentially support visual detection by training mice on a novel eyeblink conditioning task. Applying 2-photon calcium imaging and optogenetic manipulation of anatomically defined PNs, we show that layer 5 corticopontine neurons strongly encode sensory and motor task information and are selectively necessary for performance. Our findings support a model in which target-specific cortical subnetworks form the basis for adaptive behavior by directing relevant information to distinct brain areas. Overall, this work highlights the potential for neurons to form physically interspersed but functionally segregated networks capable of parallel, independent control of perception and behavior.

Intracerebellar cannabinoid administration impairs delay but not trace eyeblink conditioning

Intracerebellar administration of cannabinoid agonists impairs cerebellum-dependent delay eyeblink conditioning (EBC) in rats. It is not known whether the cannabinoid-induced impairment in EBC is found with shorter interstimulus intervals (ISI), longer ISIs, or with trace EBC. Moreover, systemic administration of cannabinoid agonists does not impair trace EBC, suggesting that cannabinoid receptors within the cerebellum are not involved in trace EBC. To more precisely assess the effects of cannabinoids on cerebellar learning mechanisms the current study examined the effects of the cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN) infusion into the area of the cerebellar cortex necessary for EBC (the eyeblink microzone) in rats during short delay (250 ms CS), long delay (750 ms CS), and trace (250 ms CS, 500 ms trace interval) EBC. WIN was infused into the eyeblink microzone 30 min before pretraining sessions and five EBC training sessions, followed by five EBC training sessions without infusions to assess recovery from drug effects and savings. WIN had no effect on spontaneous blinks or non-associative responses to the CS or US during the pretraining sessions. Short and long delay EBC were impaired by WIN but trace EBC was unaffected. The results indicate that trace EBC is mediated by mechanisms that are resistant to cannabinoid agonists.

Cannabinoid agonist administration within the cerebellar cortex impairs motor learning

Systemic administration of cannabinoid agonists impairs cerebellum-dependent motor learning. The cannabinoid-induced impairment of motor learning has been hypothesized to be due to disruption of Purkinje cell plasticity within the cerebellar cortex. In the current study, we tested this hypothesis in rats with localized microinfusions of cannabinoid agonists and antagonists into the cerebellar cortex during eyeblink conditioning, a type of cerebellum-dependent motor learning. Infusions of the cannabinoid agonists WIN55,212-2 or ACEA directly into the eyeblink conditioning microzone of the cerebellar cortex severely impaired acquisition of eyeblink conditioning, whereas the CB1R antagonist SR141716A did not produce a significant impairment. Infusions of WIN55,212-2 outside of the eyeblink conditioning microzone did not impair motor learning, establishing anatomical specificity for the agonist effects. The motor learning impairment caused by WIN55,212-2 and ACEA was rescued by SR141716A, indicating that the learning deficit was produced through CB1Rs. The current findings demonstrate that the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on motor learning are localized to CB1Rs within a discrete microzone of the cerebellar cortex.

Sensory system development influences the ontogeny of hippocampal associative coding and trace eyeblink conditioning

Until recently, it was believed that hippocampal development was the primary rate-limiting factor in the developmental emergence of hippocampal forms of learning, such as trace eyeblink conditioning (EBC). Indeed, hippocampal neuronal activity shows an age-related increase in both complexity and task responsiveness during trace EBC. However, recent work from our laboratory suggests that sensory system development may also play a role. Training with the earlier-developing somatosensory system results in an earlier emergence of trace EBC in rats, suggesting that the development of sensory input to the hippocampus may influence the development of trace EBC. The goal of the current study was to examine the activity of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells during acquisition of trace EBC with an early-developing somatosensory CS. Rat pups were trained with a vibration CS on postnatal days (P) 17-19, P21-23, and P24-26 while CA1 pyramidal cell activity was recorded. Results indicated that CA1 neurons show an age-related increase in responsiveness to trial events. Although the magnitude of neuronal responding showed age-related increases in activity, all three age groups demonstrated learning-related increases in firing rate magnitude and peaks in firing rate were evident both at CS onset and offset. These findings suggest that the ontogeny of trace eyeblink conditioning is related to both hippocampal and sensory system development.

Prolonged deficits of associative motor learning in cynomolgus monkeys after long-term administration of phencyclidine

Phencyclidine (PCP) is a potent drug of abuse that induces sustained schizophrenia-like symptoms in humans by blocking neurotransmission at N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptors. Alterations in NMDA receptor function have been linked to numerous behavioral deficits and cognitive dysfunction. Classical eye-blink conditioning (EBC), including delay (dEBC) and trace (tEBC) paradigms, provides an effective means to study the neurobiology of associative motor learning in rodents, mammals and primates. To assess whether administration of low-dosage PCP for extended periods has prolonged effect to alter associative motor learning, in this study 19 adult cynomolgus monkeys were administered PCP (0.3mg/kg, intramuscularly) or saline twice a day for 14days. Twelve-fifteen months after PCP or saline injection, monkeys received dEBC, tEBC, or pseudo-paired training for 6 or 12 successive daily sessions, respectively. The results of this study show that percentage of conditioned response (CR) in dEBC increased as a function of training sessions in both PCP-treated and control monkeys and there was no significant CR% difference between the two groups. However, the CR timing in dEBC of PCP-treated monkeys was significantly impaired, as manifested by shorter CR peak latencies than those of the control group. PCP-treated animals showed significantly lower percentage of CR in tEBC compared to controls. PCP-treated animals were also more sensitive to outside stimuli in tEBC because the UR peak latency of PCP-treated group was significantly lower than the control group. These results indicated that cynomolgus monkeys manifested prolonged deficits in associative motor learning after long-term administration of phencyclidine.

Sensory system development influences the ontogeny of trace eyeblink conditioning

The developmental emergence of delay eyeblink conditioning (EBC) is dependent on the development of the sensory system stimulated by the conditioned stimulus (CS). However, trace EBC has traditionally been believed to be dependent on the development of forebrain structures, such as the hippocampus. If hippocampal development alone is limiting the developmental emergence of trace EBC, then using an earlier developing sensory modality should not affect the rate or asymptote of conditioning. The goal of the current study was to investigate whether using a vibration CS would facilitate the ontogeny of trace EBC relative to an auditory CS. Rat pups received six sessions of trace EBC or unpaired training using either a tone or vibration CS on postnatal day (P) 17-18, 21-22, or 24-25. Training with a vibration CS resulted in rapid conditioning as early as P17-18, whereas training with a tone CS did not result in rapid conditioning until after P17-18. The results suggest that the ontogeny of trace EBC depends, at least in part, on sensory system development.

The Anatomy and Physiology of Eyeblink Classical Conditioning

This chapter reviews the past research toward identifying the brain circuit and its computation underlying the associative memory in eyeblink classical conditioning. In the standard delay eyeblink conditioning paradigm, the conditioned stimulus (CS) and eyeblink-eliciting unconditioned stimulus (US) converge in the cerebellar cortex and interpositus nucleus (IPN) through the pontine nuclei and inferior olivary nucleus. Repeated pairings of CS and US modify synaptic weights in the cerebellar cortex and IPN, enabling IPN neurons to activate the red nucleus and generate the conditioned response (CR). In a variant of the standard paradigm, trace eyeblink conditioning, the CS and US are separated by a brief stimulus-free trace interval. Acquisition in trace eyeblink conditioning depends on several forebrain regions, including the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex as well as the cerebellar-brainstem circuit. Details of computations taking place in these regions remain unclear; however, recent evidence supports a view that the forebrain encodes a temporal sequence of the CS, trace interval, and US in a specific environmental context and signals the cerebellar-brainstem circuit to execute the CR when the US is likely to occur. Together, delay eyeblink conditioning represents one of the most successful cases of understanding the neural substrates of long-term memory in mammals, while trace eyeblink conditioning demonstrates its utility for uncovering detailed computations in the whole brain network underlying long-term memory.

The ontogeny of associative cerebellar learning

Ontogenetic changes in associative cerebellar learning have been examined extensively using eyeblink conditioning in infant humans and rats. The cerebellum is essential for eyeblink conditioning in adult and infant animals. The cerebellum receives input from the conditional stimulus (CS) through the pontine mossy fiber projection and unconditional stimulus (US) input through the inferior olive climbing fiber projection. Coactivation of the CS and US pathways induces synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum, which is necessary for the conditional response. Ontogenetic changes in eyeblink conditioning are driven by developmental changes in the projections of subcortical sensory nuclei to the pontine nuclei and in the inhibitory projection from the cerebellar deep nuclei to the inferior olive. Developmental changes in the CS and US pathways limit the induction of learning-related plasticity in the cerebellum and thereby limit acquisition of eyeblink conditioning.