Dissociable contribution of nucleus accumbens and dorsolateral striatum to the acquisition of risk choice behavior in the rat

Medial orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens mediation in risk assessment behaviors in adolescents and adults

Risk assessment behaviors are necessary for gathering risk information and guiding decision-making. Risky decision-making heightens during adolescence, possibly as a result of low risk awareness and an increase in sensitivity to reward-associated cues and experiences. Higher adolescent engagement in high-risk behaviors may be, in part, due to developing circuits that contribute to risk assessment behaviors. Nucleus accumbens (NAc) activity is linked to risky decision-making and receives inputs carrying sensory and emotional information. Namely, the medial orbitofrontal cortex (MO) contributes to behavior guided by reward probability and sends direct projections to the NAc (MO→NAc), which may permit risk assessment in a mature circuit. Here, we evaluated risk assessment behaviors in adult and adolescent rats during elevated plus maze (EPM) exploration, including stretch and attend postures, head dips, and rears. We found that adolescents exhibited fewer EPM risk assessment behaviors than adults. We also quantified MO→NAc projections using a fluorescent anterograde tracer, Fluoro-Ruby, in both age groups. Labeled MO→NAc pathways exhibited greater total fluorescence in adults than in adolescents, indicating MO→NAc fibers increase over development. Using a disconnection approach to measure the contribution of the MO-NAc pathway in adults, we found that ipsilateral inactivation of the MO-NAc did not alter risk assessment behavior; however, MO-NAc disconnection reduced the number of stretch-and-attend postures. Together, this work suggests that the development of MO-NAc pathways can contribute to age-dependent differences in risk assessment.

Discovering the Lost Reward: Critical Locations for Endocannabinoid Modulation of the Cortico-Striatal Loop That Are Implicated in Major Depression

Depression, the most prevalent psychiatric disorder in the Western world, is characterized by increased negative affect (i.e., depressed mood, cost value increase) and reduced positive affect (i.e., anhedonia, reward value decrease), fatigue, loss of appetite, and reduced psychomotor activity except for cases of agitative depression. Some forms, such as post-partum depression, have a high risk for suicidal attempts. Recent studies in humans and in animal models relate major depression occurrence and reoccurrence to alterations in dopaminergic activity, in addition to other neurotransmitter systems. Imaging studies detected decreased activity in the brain reward circuits in major depression. Therefore, the location of dopamine receptors in these circuits is relevant for understanding major depression. Interestingly, in cortico-striatal-dopaminergic pathways within the reward and cost circuits, the expression of dopamine and its contribution to reward are modulated by endocannabinoid receptors. These receptors are enriched in the striosomal compartment of striatum that selectively projects to dopaminergic neurons of substantia nigra compacta and is vulnerable to stress. This review aims to show the crosstalk between endocannabinoid and dopamine receptors and their vulnerability to stress in the reward circuits, especially in corticostriatal regions. The implications for novel treatments of major depression are discussed.

Neurobiological changes in striatal glutamate are associated with trait impulsivity of differential reinforcement of low-rate-response behavior in male rats

Impulsive action can be measured using rat's responses on a differential reinforcement of low-rate-response (DRL) task in which performance may be varied between rats. Nevertheless, neurobiological profiles underlying the trait impulsivity of DRL behavior remain largely unknown. Here, in vivo non-invasive proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-MRS) and Western blot assay were performed to assess neurobiological changes in the dorsal striatum (DS) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) in relation to individual differences in DRL behavior. A cohort of rats was subjected to acquire a DRL task over 14 daily sessions. High impulsive (HI) and low impulsive (LI) rats were screened by behavioral measures displaying a lower response efficiency and performing more nonreinforced responses in HI rats and vice versa. MRS measurements indicated that the HI group had a lower NAc glutamate (Glu) level than did the LI group, whereas no such difference was found in the other five metabolites in this area. Moreover, no intergroup difference was observed in any metabolite in the DS. The results of Western blot assay revealed that protein expressions of GluN1 (but not GluN2B) subunit of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the DS and NAc were higher in the HI group than in the LI group. This inherent timing impulsivity was not attributed to risky behavioral propensity because both Hl and LI rats could acquire a risk-dependent choice. The findings of this study, supported by certain correlations among behavioral, brain imaging, and neuroreceptor indices, provide evidence of the neurobiological changes of striatal Glu underlying trait impulsive action of DRL behavior.

Differential effects of d-amphetamine and atomoxetine on risk-based decision making of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats

Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder tend to make risker choices during probabilistic-discounting procedures. Thus, how common attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications affect probabilistic discounting is of interest. In general, d-amphetamine increases risk-taking while atomoxetine has produced mixed effects in rats. Results from previous studies may result from genetic factors. Lewis and F344 rats have neurochemical differences that may be relevant to probabilistic discounting and how drugs affect such behavior. In this study, we evaluated dose-dependent effects of d-amphetamine and atomoxetine on probabilistic discounting of Lewis and F344. Male Lewis and F344 chose between one food pellet delivered 100% of the time and three food pellets delivered following decreasing probabilities of delivery (i.e. 100%, 66.7%, 33.3%, 16.5%, and 8.25%). Saline, d-amphetamine (0.1-1.8 mg/kg), and atomoxetine (0.1-7.8 mg/kg) were tested acutely. Lewis and F344 did not differ in choice at baseline. d-Amphetamine increased risky choice for both rat strains at low-to-moderate doses, although it did so at a lower dose (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) for F344 as compared to Lewis (0.3 mg/kg only). At high doses (1.0 and 1.8 mg/kg), d-amphetamine disrupted choice, increased frequencies of omitted trials, and reduced reinforcer sensitivity. Although atomoxetine increased frequencies of omitted trials at high doses (5.6 and 7.8 mg/kg), it had no effect on probabilistic discounting for either rat strain. Although Lewis and F344 differ in various types of impulsivity (i.e. motor, choice), with Lewis being the more impulsive of the two, the present results suggest that Lewis and F344 do not differ in risk-based decision-making. Effects of d-amphetamine on probabilistic discounting may be biology-dependent and differ from effects of atomoxetine.

Effects of striatal lesions on components of choice: Reward discrimination, preference, and relative valuation

The striatum is a key structure involved in reward processing and choice. Recently, we have developed a paradigm to explore how components of reward processing work together or independently during choice behavior. These components include reward discrimination, preference and relative valuation, and the goal of the present study was to determine how the striatum is involved in these dissociable components during this novel free choice paradigm. We tested choice utilizing two different outcome series with one being a more straightforward single-option discrimination anchored by a 0 reward outcome, and the other as a multi-option outcome discrimination of greater difficulty. We compared the free choice reward task to a sequential reward task and an extinction task. Striatal lesions impaired responding only in the free choice version with alterations in both appetitive and consummatory measures. Ventral striatal lesions had greater impact altering discrimination, preference and relative valuation in both the single and multi-option week studies. A major factor involved in these deficits was a significant aversion to the multi-option that contained a larger outcome option but with a longer delay to reward. Dorsal striatal lesions caused less impairment even leading to enhanced choice behavior compared to control animals during the more difficult multi-option free choice series. Overall, the results suggest that the context of action is crucial when linking striatal function to choice behavior and its diverse components. The implications include the idea that striatal involvement in decision-making is increased when responses are self-paced and diverse in a more naturalistic environment.