mAChR-dependent decrease in proteasome activity in the gustatory cortex is necessary for novel taste learning

The ubiquitin-proteasome system and learning-dependent synaptic plasticity - A 10 year update

Over 25 years ago, a seminal paper demonstrated that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) was involved in activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. Interest in this topic began to expand around 2008 following another seminal paper showing that UPS-mediated protein degradation controlled the "destabilization" of memories following retrieval, though we remained with only a basic understanding of how the UPS regulated activity- and learning-dependent synaptic plasticity. However, over the last 10 years there has been an explosion of papers on this topic that has significantly changed our understanding of how ubiquitin-proteasome signaling regulates synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Importantly, we now know that the UPS controls much more than protein degradation, is involved in plasticity underlying drugs of abuse and that there are significant sex differences in how ubiquitin-proteasome signaling is used for memory storage processes. Here, we aim to provide a critical 10-year update on the role of ubiquitin-proteasome signaling in synaptic plasticity and memory formation, including updated cellular models of how ubiquitin-proteasome activity could be regulating learning-dependent synaptic plasticity in the brain.

Proteasome-independent K63 polyubiquitination selectively regulates ATP levels and proteasome activity during fear memory formation in the female amygdala

Females are more likely than males to develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the neurobiological mechanisms responsible for these sex differences remain elusive. The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is involved in fear memory formation and implicated in PTSD development. Despite this, proteasome-independent functions of the UPS have rarely been studied in the brain. Here, using a combination of molecular, biochemical, proteomic, behavioral, and novel genetic approaches, we investigated the role of proteasome-independent lysine-63 (K63)-polyubiquitination, the second most abundant ubiquitin modification in cells, in the amygdala during fear memory formation in male and female rats. Only females had increased levels of K63-polyubiquitination targeting in the amygdala following fear conditioning, which targeted proteins involved in ATP synthesis and proteasome function. CRISPR-dCas13b-mediated knockdown of K63-polyubiquitination in the amygdala via editing of the K63 codon in the major ubiquitin gene, Ubc, impaired fear memory in females, but not males, and caused a reduction in learning-related increases in ATP levels and proteasome activity in the female amygdala. These results suggest that proteasome-independent K63-polyubiquitination is selectively involved in fear memory formation in the female amygdala, where it is involved in the regulation of ATP synthesis and proteasome activity following learning. This indicates the first link between proteasome-independent and proteasome-dependent UPS functions in the brain during fear memory formation. Importantly, these data are congruent with reported sex differences in PTSD development and may contribute to our understanding of why females are more likely to develop PTSD than males.

Protein SUMOylation is a sex-specific regulator of fear memory formation in the amygdala

Strong evidence has implicated ubiquitin signaling in the process of fear memory formation. While less abundant than ubiquitination, evidence suggests that protein SUMOylation may also be involved in fear memory formation in neurons. However, the importance of amygdala protein SUMOylation in fear memory formation has never been directly examined. Furthermore, while recent evidence indicates that males and females differ significantly in the requirement for ubiquitin signaling during fear memory formation, whether sex differences also exist in the importance of protein SUMOylation to this process remains unknown. Here we found that males and females differ in the requirement for protein SUMOylation in the amygdala during fear memory formation. Western blot analysis revealed that while females had higher resting levels of SUMOylation, both sexes showed global increases following fear conditioning. However, SUMOylation-specific proteomic analysis revealed that only females have increased targeting of individual proteins by SUMOylation following fear conditioning, some of which were heat shock proteins. This suggests that protein SUMOylation is more robustly engaged in the amygdala of females following fear conditioning. In vivo siRNA mediated knockdown of Ube2i, the coding gene for the essential E2 ligase for SUMOylation conjugation, in the amygdala impaired fear memory in males without any effect in females. Importantly, higher siRNA concentrations than what was needed to impair memory in males reduced Ube2i levels in the amygdala of females but resulted in an increase in SUMOylation levels, suggesting a compensatory effect in females that was not observed in males. Collectively, these data reveal a novel, sex-specific role for protein SUMOylation in the amygdala during fear memory formation and expand our understanding of how ubiquitin-like signaling regulates memory formation.

Proteomic Analysis Reveals Sex-Specific Protein Degradation Targets in the Amygdala During Fear Memory Formation

Ubiquitin-proteasome mediated protein degradation has been widely implicated in fear memory formation in the amygdala. However, to date, the protein targets of the proteasome remain largely unknown, limiting our understanding of the functional significance for protein degradation in fear memory formation. Additionally, whether similar proteins are targeted by the proteasome between sexes has yet to be explored. Here, we combined a degradation-specific K48 Tandem Ubiquitin Binding Entity (TUBE) with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) to identify the target substrates of the protein degradation process in the amygdala of male and female rats following contextual fear conditioning. We found that males (43) and females (77) differed in the total number of proteins that had significant changes in K48 polyubiquitin targeting in the amygdala following fear conditioning. Many of the identified proteins (106) had significantly reduced levels in the K48-purified samples 1 h after fear conditioning, suggesting active degradation of the substrate due to learning. Interestingly, only 3 proteins overlapped between sexes, suggesting that targets of the protein degradation process may be sex-specific. In females, many proteins with altered abundance in the K48-purified samples were involved in vesicle transport or are associated with microtubules. Conversely, in males, proteins involved in the cytoskeleton, ATP synthesis and cell signaling were found to have significantly altered abundance. Only 1 protein had an opposite directional change in abundance between sexes, LENG1, which was significantly enhanced in males while lower in females. This suggests a more rapid degradation of this protein in females during fear memory formation. Interestingly, GFAP, a critical component of astrocyte structure, was a target of K48 polyubiquitination in both males and females, indicating that protein degradation is likely occurring in astrocytes following fear conditioning. Western blot assays revealed reduced levels of these target substrates following fear conditioning in both sexes, confirming that the K48 polyubiquitin was targeting these proteins for degradation. Collectively, this study provides strong evidence that sex differences exist in the protein targets of the degradation process in the amygdala following fear conditioning and critical information regarding how ubiquitin-proteasome mediated protein degradation may contribute to fear memory formation in the brain.

Females, but not males, require protein degradation in the hippocampus for contextual fear memory formation

Strong evidence supports a role for protein degradation in fear memory formation. However, these data have been largely done in only male animals. Here, we found that following contextual fear conditioning, females, but not males, had increased levels of proteasome activity and K48 polyubiquitin protein targeting in the dorsal hippocampus, the latter of which occurred at chaperones or RNA processing proteins. In vivo CRISPR–dCas9-mediated repression of protein degradation in the dorsal hippocampus impaired contextual fear memory in females, but not males. These results suggest a sex-specific role for protein degradation in the hippocampus during the consolidation of a contextual fear memory.

Sex-Specific Linear Polyubiquitination Is a Critical Regulator of Contextual Fear Memory Formation

Strong evidence supports that protein ubiquitination is a critical regulator of fear memory formation. However, as this work has focused on protein degradation, it is currently unknown whether polyubiquitin modifications that are independent of the proteasome are involved in learning-dependent synaptic plasticity. Here, we present the first evidence that atypical linear (M1) polyubiquitination, the only ubiquitin chain that does not occur at a lysine site and is largely independent of the proteasome, is critically involved in contextual fear memory formation in the amygdala in a sex-specific manner. Using immunoblot and unbiased proteomic analyses, we found that male (49) and female (14) rats both had increased levels of linear polyubiquitinated substrates following fear conditioning, though none of these protein targets overlapped between sexes. In males, target protein functions involved cell junction and axonal guidance signaling, while in females the primary target was Adiponectin A, a critical regulator of neuroinflammation, synaptic plasticity, and memory, suggesting sex-dependent functional roles for linear polyubiquitination during fear memory formation. Consistent with these increases, in vivo siRNA-mediated knockdown of Rnf31, an essential component of the linear polyubiquitin E3 complex LUBAC, in the amygdala impaired contextual fear memory in both sexes without affecting memory retrieval. Collectively, these results provide the first evidence that proteasome-independent linear polyubiquitination is a critical regulator of fear memory formation, expanding the potential roles of ubiquitin-signaling in learning-dependent synaptic plasticity. Importantly, our data identify a novel sex difference in the functional role of, but not a requirement for, linear polyubiquitination in fear memory formation.

Males and females differ in the regulation and engagement of, but not requirement for, protein degradation in the amygdala during fear memory formation

Over the last decade, strong evidence has emerged that protein degradation mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is critical for fear memory formation in the amygdala. However, this work has been done primarily in males, leaving unanswered questions about whether females also require protein degradation during fear memory formation. Here, we found that male and female rats differed in their engagement and regulation of, but not need for, protein degradation in the amygdala during fear memory formation. Male, but not female, rats had increased protein degradation in the nuclei of amygdala cells after fear conditioning. Conversely, females had elevated baseline levels of overall ubiquitin-proteasome activity in amygdala nuclei. Gene expression and DNA methylation analyses identified that females had increased baseline expression of the ubiquitin coding gene Uba52, which had increased DNA 5-hydroxymethylation (5hmc) in its promoter region, indicating a euchromatin state necessary for increased levels of ubiquitin in females. Consistent with this, persistent CRISPR-dCas9 mediated silencing of Uba52 and proteasome subunit Psmd14 in the amygdala reduced baseline protein degradation levels and impaired fear memory in male and female rats, while enhancing baseline protein degradation in the amygdala of both sexes promoted fear memory formation. These results suggest that while both males and females require protein degradation in the amygdala for fear memory formation, they differ in their baseline regulation and engagement of this process following learning. These results have important implications for understanding the etiology of sex-related differences in fear memory formation.

Taste Processing: Insights from Animal Models

Taste processing is an adaptive mechanism involving complex physiological, motivational and cognitive processes. Animal models have provided relevant data about the neuroanatomical and neurobiological components of taste processing. From these models, two important domains of taste responses are described in this review. The first part focuses on the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological bases of olfactory and taste processing. The second part describes the biological and behavioral characteristics of taste learning, with an emphasis on conditioned taste aversion as a key process for the survival and health of many species, including humans.

Males and Females Differ in the Subcellular and Brain Region Dependent Regulation of Proteasome Activity by CaMKII and Protein Kinase A

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) controls the degradation of ~90% of short-lived proteins in cells and is involved in activity- and learning-dependent synaptic plasticity in the brain. Calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and Protein Kinase A (PKA) can regulate activity of the proteasome. However, there have been a number of conflicting reports regarding under what conditions CaMKII and PKA regulate proteasome activity in the brain. Furthermore, this work has been done exclusively in males, leaving questions about whether these kinases also regulate the proteasome in females. Here, using subcellular fractionation protocols in combination with in vitro pharmacology and proteasome activity assays, we investigated the conditions under which CaMKII and PKA regulate proteasome activity in the brains of male and female rats. In males, nuclear proteasome chymotrypsin activity was regulated by PKA in the amygdala but CaMKII in the hippocampus. Conversely, in females CaMKII regulated nuclear chymotrypsin activity in the amygdala, but not hippocampus. Additionally, in males CaMKII and PKA regulated proteasome trypsin activity in the cytoplasm of hippocampal, but not amygdala cells, while in females both CaMKII and PKA could regulate this activity in the nucleus of cells in both regions. Proteasome peptidylglutamyl activity was regulated by CaMKII and PKA activity in the nuclei of amygdala and hippocampus cells in males. However, in females PKA regulated nuclear peptidylglutamyl activity in the amygdala, but not hippocampus. Collectively, these results suggest that CaMKII- and PKA-dependent regulation of proteasome activity in the brain varies significantly across subcellular compartments and between males and females.

Distinct subcellular changes in proteasome activity and linkage-specific protein polyubiquitination in the amygdala during the consolidation and reconsolidation of a fear memory

Numerous studies have supported a critical role for the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) in the memory consolidation and reconsolidation processes. The protein targets and functional role of ubiquitin-proteasome activity can vary widely across cellular compartments, however, it is unknown how UPS activity changes within the nuclear, cytoplasmic, and synaptic regions in response to learning or memory retrieval. Additionally, while previous studies have focused on degradation-specific protein polyubiquitination, it is unknown how learning alters other polyubiquitin tags that are not targeted by the proteasome. Using cellular fractionation protocols in combination with linkage-specific polyubiquitin antibodies, we examined subcellular changes in ubiquitin-proteasome activity in the amygdala during memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Following memory acquisition, overall protein ubiquitination and proteasome activity simultaneously increased in the nucleus and decreased in the synaptic and cytoplasmic regions. The nuclear increases were associated with upregulation of degradation-specific (K48) and degradation-independent (K63, M1) polyubiquitin tags, suggesting multiple functions for ubiquitin signaling within this region. Interestingly, retrieval induced a very different pattern of ubiquitin-proteasome activity in the amygdala, consisting of increases in overall protein ubiquitination and proteasome activity and K48-, K63-, and M1-polyubiquitin tags in the synaptic, but not nuclear or cytoplasmic regions. Collectively, learning and memory retrieval dynamically and differentially alter degradation-dependent and degradation-independent ubiquitin-proteasome activity across different cellular compartments, suggesting that the UPS may serve unique functions during memory consolidation and reconsolidation.

The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Memory: Moving Beyond Protein Degradation

Cellular models of memory formation have focused on the need for protein synthesis. Recently, evidence has emerged that protein degradation mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is also important for this process. This has led to revised cellular models of memory formation that focus on a balance between protein degradation and synthesis. However, protein degradation is only one function of the UPS. Studies using single-celled organisms have shown that non-proteolytic ubiquitin-proteasome signaling is involved in histone modifications and DNA methylation, suggesting that ubiquitin and the proteasome can regulate chromatin remodeling independent of protein degradation. Despite this evidence, the idea that the UPS is more than a protein degradation pathway has not been examined in the context of memory formation. In this article, we summarize recent findings implicating protein degradation in memory formation and discuss various ways in which both ubiquitin signaling and the proteasome could act independently to regulate epigenetic-mediated transcriptional processes necessary for learning-dependent synaptic plasticity. We conclude by proposing comprehensive models of how non-proteolytic functions of the UPS could work in concert to control epigenetic regulation of the cellular memory consolidation process, which will serve as a framework for future studies examining the role of the UPS in memory formation.

The Insula and Taste Learning

The sense of taste is a key component of the sensory machinery, enabling the evaluation of both the safety as well as forming associations regarding the nutritional value of ingestible substances. Indicative of the salience of the modality, taste conditioning can be achieved in rodents upon a single pairing of a tastant with a chemical stimulus inducing malaise. This robust associative learning paradigm has been heavily linked with activity within the insular cortex (IC), among other regions, such as the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex. A number of studies have demonstrated taste memory formation to be dependent on protein synthesis at the IC and to correlate with the induction of signaling cascades involved in synaptic plasticity. Taste learning has been shown to require the differential involvement of dopaminergic GABAergic, glutamatergic, muscarinic neurotransmission across an extended taste learning circuit. The subsequent activation of downstream protein kinases (ERK, CaMKII), transcription factors (CREB, Elk-1) and immediate early genes (c-fos, Arc), has been implicated in the regulation of the different phases of taste learning. This review discusses the relevant neurotransmission, molecular signaling pathways and genetic markers involved in novel and aversive taste learning, with a particular focus on the IC. Imaging and other studies in humans have implicated the IC in the pathophysiology of a number of cognitive disorders. We conclude that the IC participates in circuit-wide computations that modulate the interception and encoding of sensory information, as well as the formation of subjective internal representations that control the expression of motivated behaviors.