The analgesic effect of orexin-A in a murine model of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain

The stress-induced antinociceptive responses to the persistent inflammatory pain involve the orexin receptors in the nucleus accumbens

Stress suppresses the sense of pain, a physiological phenomenon known as stress-induced analgesia (SIA). Brain orexin peptides regulate many physiological functions, including wakefulness and nociception. The contribution of the orexinergic system within the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in the modulation of antinociception induced by forced swim stress (FSS) remains unclear. The present study addressed the role of intra-accumbal orexin receptors in the antinociceptive responses induced by FSS during the persistent inflammatory pain model in the rat. Stereotaxic surgery was performed unilaterally on 106 adult male Wistar rats weighing 250-305 g. Different doses (1, 3, 10, and 30 nmol/ 0.5 μl DMSO) of orexin-1 receptor (OX1r) antagonist (SB334867) or OX2 receptor antagonist (TCS OX2 29) were administered into the NAc five minutes before exposure to FSS for a 6-min period. The formalin test was carried out using formalin injection (50 μl; 2.5%) into the rat's hind paw plantar surface, which induces biphasic pain-related responses. The first phase begins immediately after formalin infusion and takes 3-5 min. Subsequently, the late phase begins 15-20 min after formalin injection and takes 20-40 min. The findings demonstrated that intra-accumbal microinjection of SB334867 or TCS OX2 29 attenuated the FSS-induced antinociception in both phases of the formalin test, with the TCS OX2 29 showing higher potency. Moreover, the effect of TCS OX2 29 was more significant during the early phase of the formalin test. The results suggest that OX1 and OX2 receptors in the NAc might modulate the antinociceptive responses induced by the FSS.

Antagonism of the orexin receptors in the ventral tegmental area diminished the stress-induced analgesia in persistent inflammatory pain

As a part of descending pain inhibitory system, orexin (OXs) in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are implicated in nociceptive responses. The current study aimed to evaluate the role of OX receptors (OXRs) in the VTA in stress-induced analgesia in persistent inflammatory pain. Ninety-nine adult male Wistar rats underwent forced swim stress (FSS) following intra-VTA infusion of various doses of SB334867 or TCS OX2 29 (1, 3, 10, and 30 nmol/0.3 μL) as an OX1R or OX2R antagonist, respectively. The nociceptive threshold was evaluated using the formalin test as an animal model of persistent inflammatory pain. Current results demonstrated FSS as acute stress produced analgesic responses in the persistent inflammatory pain. Moreover, either OX1R or OX2R antagonist infusion in the VTA hindered the FSS-induced analgesia in both early and late phases. The inhibitory effect of SB334768 in the FSS-induced analgesia was stronger than TCS OX2 29 in both early and late phases of the formalin test. Neither SB334768 nor TCS OX2 29 alone affects pain-related behaviors in formalin tests. Intra-VTA microinjection of each treatment could not modify locomotion in rats. The findings suggest that OX1R and OX2R in the VTA are implicated in FSS-induced analgesia mechanisms.

An interaction between basolateral amygdala orexinergic and endocannabinoid systems in inducing anti-nociception in the rat formalin test

The amygdala has emerged as the main brain center for the emotional affective dimension of pain and pain modulation. In the amygdala, orexin and cannabinoid receptors are expressed in relatively high concentrations. To investigate the possible interaction between the amygdala orexin and cannabinoid systems on the modulation of inflammatory pain, we conducted formalin, rotarod, and plethysmometer tests, as well as analyzing mRNA expression of orexin and cannabinoid receptors in male rats. The basolateral amygdala (BLA) was unilaterally implanted by a guide cannula. Our results showed that, compared to saline and DMSO/saline, intra-BLA microinjection of orexin-A (50 and 100 µM) decreased flinch response in the early phase, but not in the late phase of the formalin test. However, these injections had no significant effect on the mRNA expression level of BLA, orexin receptor type-1 (Orx₁), and cannabinoid receptor type-1 (Cb1). Moreover, intra-BLA administration of Orx₁ receptor antagonist (SB-334867; 50 nM) and Cb1 receptor antagonist (AM251; 250 and 500 nM) decreased flinch response only in the early phase of the formalin test as compared to the DMSO group. Although the intra-BLA infusion of orexin-A alone and along with SB-334867 or AM251 decreased flinch response in the early phase of the formalin test, intra-BLA co-microinjection of SB-334867/AM251/OrxA increased flinch response in both early and late phases of the formalin test when compared to the DMSO/OrxA group. Interestingly, in the SB-334867/AM251/OrxA group, the Cb1 receptor was upregulated in all groups in comparison to Orx₁ receptors. Our results revealed an interaction between BLA, orexin-A, and Cb1 receptors in inducing anti-nociception in the formalin test.

Intra-CA1 injection of orexin receptors antagonism attenuates the stress-induced analgesia in a rat acute pain model

Orexins or hypocretins are excitatory neuropeptides predominantly produced by neuronal clusters in the lateral hypothalamus. The orexinergic system's involvement in pain modulation makes it a candidate for pain control alternative to the opioid system. Moreover, orexin-1 and orexin -2 receptors (OX1r and OX2r, respectively) play a role in responsiveness to stressful stimuli. Some evidence indicates that the Cornu Ammonis 1 (CA1) region of the hippocampus potentially participates in the modulation of both pain and stress. In quest of better understanding the interaction between orexin receptors and stress-induced analgesia (SIA), The present study examined the involvement of OX1r and OX2r within the CA1 in response to acute pain after exposure to forced swim stress (FSS) for a 6-min period. Adult male Wistar rats received different doses of OX1r antagonist (SB334867; 1, 3, 10, and 30 nmol), OX2r antagonist (TCS OX2 29; 3, 10, 30 and 100 nmol), or vehicle (0.5 μl DMSO) through an implanted cannula. After that, animals individually experienced acute pain by performing the tail-flick test. Results indicated that FSS produces antinociceptive responses in the tail-flick test. Blockade of both orexin receptors within the CA1 region attenuated the analgesic effect of FSS. The antinociceptive effect of swim stress was prevented by lower doses of SB334867 than TCS OX2 29. These findings show that the orexinergic system might be partially involved in the SIA via the OX1 and OX2 receptors in the hippocampal CA1 region.

Role of hippocampal orexin receptors in antinociception elicited by chemical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus in the tail-flick test

The lateral hypothalamus (LH) orexinergic neurons project to numerous brain regions implicated in pain perception, including the CA1 part of the hippocampal formation. Moreover, the roles of orexin receptors (OXRs) in the CA1 in anti-analgesic consequences of the LH chemical stimulation by carbachol, muscarinic receptor agonist, in acute pain have not been clarified. The current research showed OXRs antagonist administration's effect in the CA1 on analgesia elicited by the LH chemical stimulation in a tail-flick test as an acute model of pain. The control groups, including vehicle-control groups, were given intra-LH administration of saline (0.5 μL), following intra-CA1 infusion of DMSO (12 %; 0.5 μL), and carbachol-control groups were treated with carbachol (250 nM/0.5 μL saline) into the LH following DMSO in the CA1. Treated groups received SB334867 (1, 3, 10, and 30 nM/0.5 μL DMSO) or TCS OX2 29 (0.1, 1, 10, and 20 nM/0.5 μL DMSO) as OX1R or OX2R antagonist, respectively, in the CA1 prior intra-LH administration of carbachol. After all injections, all rats underwent the tail-flick test over a 60-min time. Infusion of SB334867 or TCS OX2 29 in the CA1 impaired the analgesic consequences following chemical stimulation of the LH in acute pain. Meanwhile suppressive impact of the OX1R or OX2R antagonist on the analgesic impact of LH chemical stimulation was approximately identical. The current investigation provided a new document about the critical involvement of hippocampal orexinergic system in the modulatory role of the LH-CA1 path in pain perception.

Review of the Role of the Brain in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common, debilitating, and dose-limiting side effect of many chemotherapy regimens yet has limited treatments due to incomplete knowledge of its pathophysiology. Research on the pathophysiology of CIPN has focused on peripheral nerves because CIPN symptoms are felt in the hands and feet. However, better understanding the role of the brain in CIPN may accelerate understanding, diagnosing, and treating CIPN. The goals of this review are to (1) investigate the role of the brain in CIPN, and (2) use this knowledge to inform future research and treatment of CIPN. We identified 16 papers using brain interventions in animal models of CIPN and five papers using brain imaging in humans or monkeys with CIPN. These studies suggest that CIPN is partly caused by (1) brain hyperactivity, (2) reduced GABAergic inhibition, (3) neuroinflammation, and (4) overactivation of GPCR/MAPK pathways. These four features were observed in several brain regions including the thalamus, periaqueductal gray, anterior cingulate cortex, somatosensory cortex, and insula. We discuss how to leverage this knowledge for future preclinical research, clinical research, and brain-based treatments for CIPN.

Intermittent REM sleep deprivation attenuates the development of morphine tolerance and dependence in male rats

Opioid agonists are used in clinic for pain management, however this application is challenged by development of tolerance and dependence following prolonged exposure. Various approaches have been suggested to address this concern, however, there is still no consensus among the researchers. Neural processing of sleep and nociception are co-regulated through shared brain regions having bidirectional interplays. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether application of REM sleep deprivation (REM-SD) could affect morphine analgesic tolerance and dependence. To this end, adult male rats underwent sleep deprivation during light and dark phases (LSD and DSD, respectively) using the inverted flower pot method and then tolerance and dependence was induced by repeated injection of morphine for 7 days (10 mg/kg, daily, i.p.). Results indicated that REM-SD delays the development of tolerance to morphine during both phases; however this effect was more potent following LSD. Moreover, LSD decreased the baseline thermal threshold and total withdrawal score. One possible hypothesis for our observations is REM-SD-induced attenuation of orexin system which is still controversial among the researchers. Other stronger possibilities might be down-regulation of opioid receptors in response to sleep loss experience. Finally, it seems that modification of sleep periods may assist to decrease the severity of opioid tolerance and dependence.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Nursing Implications

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an unsolved and potentially life-compromising problem for most patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. It manifests with numbness, tingling, and possibly neuropathic pain and motor and autonomic symptoms. This review aims to provide an evidence synthesis that prepares nurses to comprehensively assess, provide supportive care for, and critically evaluate the literature on CIPN. The prevalence, significance, characteristics, mechanisms, and risk factors of CIPN will be discussed, as well as nursing-relevant evidence on the assessment, prevention, and management of CIPN. The importance of critical literature evaluation before clinical implementation to reduce physical and financial harms to patients will also be highlighted.

Therapeutic Agents for Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy; Experimental and Clinical Evidence

Oxaliplatin is an essential drug in the chemotherapy of colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers, but it frequently causes peripheral neuropathy as a dose-limiting factor. So far, animal models of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy have been established. The mechanisms of development of neuropathy induced by oxaliplatin have been elucidated, and many drugs and agents have been proven to have neuroprotective effects in basic studies. In addition, some of these drugs have been validated in clinical studies for their inhibitory effects on neuropathy. In this review, we summarize the basic and clinical evidence for the therapeutic effects of oxaliplatin. In basic research, there are many reports of neuropathy inhibitors that target oxidative stress, inflammatory response, sodium channel, transient receptor potential (TRP) channel, glutamate nervous system, and monoamine nervous system. Alternatively, very few drugs have clearly demonstrated the efficacy for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in clinical trials. It is important to activate translational research in order to translate basic research into clinical research.

Therapeutic Agents for Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy; Experimental and Clinical Evidence

Oxaliplatin is an essential drug in the chemotherapy of colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers, but it frequently causes peripheral neuropathy as a dose-limiting factor. So far, animal models of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy have been established. The mechanisms of development of neuropathy induced by oxaliplatin have been elucidated, and many drugs and agents have been proven to have neuroprotective effects in basic studies. In addition, some of these drugs have been validated in clinical studies for their inhibitory effects on neuropathy. In this review, we summarize the basic and clinical evidence for the therapeutic effects of oxaliplatin. In basic research, there are many reports of neuropathy inhibitors that target oxidative stress, inflammatory response, sodium channel, transient receptor potential (TRP) channel, glutamate nervous system, and monoamine nervous system. Alternatively, very few drugs have clearly demonstrated the efficacy for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in clinical trials. It is important to activate translational research in order to translate basic research into clinical research.

Therapeutic Agents for Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy; Experimental and Clinical Evidence

Oxaliplatin is an essential drug in the chemotherapy of colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers, but it frequently causes peripheral neuropathy as a dose-limiting factor. So far, animal models of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy have been established. The mechanisms of development of neuropathy induced by oxaliplatin have been elucidated, and many drugs and agents have been proven to have neuroprotective effects in basic studies. In addition, some of these drugs have been validated in clinical studies for their inhibitory effects on neuropathy. In this review, we summarize the basic and clinical evidence for the therapeutic effects of oxaliplatin. In basic research, there are many reports of neuropathy inhibitors that target oxidative stress, inflammatory response, sodium channel, transient receptor potential (TRP) channel, glutamate nervous system, and monoamine nervous system. Alternatively, very few drugs have clearly demonstrated the efficacy for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in clinical trials. It is important to activate translational research in order to translate basic research into clinical research.

Antinociceptive effects of oleuropein in experimental models of neuropathic pain in male rats

Background

The present investigation explored the therapeutic actions of oleuropein along with the possible signaling pathway involved in attenuating neuropathic pain in chronic constriction injury (CCI) and vincristine-induced neuropathic pain in male rats.

Methods

Four loose ligatures were placed around the sciatic nerve to induce CCI, and vincristine (50 μg/kg) was injected for 10 days to develop neuropathic pain. The development of cold allodynia, mechanical allodynia, and mechanical hyperalgesia was assessed using different pain-related behavioral tests. The levels of H₂S, cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE), cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS), orexin, and nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) were measured in the sciatic nerve.

Results

Treatment with oleuropein for 14 days led to significant amelioration of behavioral manifestations of neuropathic pain in two pain models. Moreover, oleuropein restored both CCI and vincristine-induced decreases in H₂S, CSE, CBS, orexin, and Nrf2 levels. Co-administration of suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, significantly counteracted the pain-attenuating actions of oleuropein and Nrf2 levels without modulating H₂S, CSE and CBS.

Conclusions

Oleuropein has therapeutic potential to attenuate the pain manifestations in CCI and vincristine-induced neuropathic pain, possibly by restoring the CSE, CBS, and H₂S, which may subsequently increase the expression of orexin and Nrf2 to ameliorate behavioral manifestations of pain.

Differential role of specific cardiovascular neuropeptides in pain regulation: Relevance to cardiovascular diseases

In many instances, the perception of pain is disproportionate to the strength of the algesic stimulus. Excessive or inadequate pain sensation is frequently observed in cardiovascular diseases, especially in coronary ischemia. The mechanisms responsible for individual differences in the perception of cardiovascular pain are not well recognized. Cardiovascular disorders may provoke pain in multiple ways engaging molecules released locally in the heart due to tissue ischemia, inflammation or cellular stress, and through neurogenic and endocrine mechanisms brought into action by hemodynamic disturbances. Cardiovascular neuropeptides, namely angiotensin II (Ang II), angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)], vasopressin, oxytocin, and orexins belong to this group. Although participation of these peptides in the regulation of circulation and pain has been firmly established, their mutual interaction in the regulation of pain in cardiovascular diseases has not been profoundly analyzed. In the present review we discuss the regulation of the release, and mechanisms of the central and systemic actions of these peptides on the cardiovascular system in the context of their central and peripheral nociceptive (Ang II) and antinociceptive [Ang-(1-7), vasopressin, oxytocin, orexins] properties. We also consider the possibility that they may play a significant role in the modulation of pain in cardiovascular diseases. The rationale for focusing attention on these very compounds was based on the following premises (1) cardiovascular disturbances influence the release of these peptides (2) they regulate vascular tone and cardiac function and can influence the intensity of ischemia - the factor initiating pain signals in the cardiovascular system, (3) they differentially modulate nociception through peripheral and central mechanisms, and their effect strongly depends on specific receptors and site of action. Accordingly, an altered release of these peptides and/or pharmacological blockade of their receptors may have a significant but different impact on individual sensation of pain and comfort of an individual patient.

Involvement of descending pain control system regulated by orexin receptor signaling in the induction of central post-stroke pain in mice

Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a type of neuropathic pain for which the mechanism and relevant drug pathways remain unknown. Recently, it was reported that intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of orexin-A suppresses pain and ischemia. In this study, we tested the role of orexin-A in CPSP induction in mice. Male ddY mice were subjected to 30 min of bilateral carotid artery occlusion (BCAO). CPSP was assessed by von Frey test. Colocalization of orexin 1 receptor (OX1R) with various neuron markers were determined by double-immunofluorescence. The hindpaw withdrawal responses to mechanical stimuli were significantly increased 3 days post-BCAO compared with those of sham groups. ICV injection of orexin-A dose-dependently suppressed BCAO-induced mechanical allodynia. These effects were inhibited by pre-treatment with SB334867 (an OX1R antagonist; ICV injection), yohimbine (a noradrenaline α₂ receptor antagonist; intrathecal (IT) injection), and WAY100635 (a serotonin 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist; IT injection), but not TCS OX2 29 (an OX2R antagonist; ICV injection). OX1R colocalized with TH (a noradrenergic neuron marker) and TPH (a serotonergic neuron marker) in the locus ceruleus (LC) and the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), respectively. The number of c-Fos positive cells in the LC and the RVM of BCAO mice was increased at 90 min after ICV injection of orexin-A compared to saline group. These results indicate that orexin-A/OX1R signaling plays an important role through activation of the descending pain control system in the induction of CPSP in mice.

Sleep deficiency and chronic pain: potential underlying mechanisms and clinical implications

Pain can be both a cause and a consequence of sleep deficiency. This bidirectional relationship between sleep and pain has important implications for clinical management of patients, but also for chronic pain prevention and public health more broadly. The review that follows will provide an overview of the neurobiological evidence of mechanisms thought to be involved in the modulation of pain by sleep deficiency, including the opioid, monoaminergic, orexinergic, immune, melatonin, and endocannabinoid systems; the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis; and adenosine and nitric oxide signaling. In addition, it will provide a broad overview of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for the management of chronic pain comorbid with sleep disturbances and for the management of postoperative pain, as well as discuss the effects of sleep-disturbing medications on pain amplification.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy-part 2: focus on the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is regarded as one of the most common dose-limiting adverse effects of several chemotherapeutic agents, such as platinum derivatives (oxaliplatin and cisplatin), taxanes, vinca alkaloids and bortezomib. CIPN affects more than 60% of patients receiving anticancer therapy and although it is a nonfatal condition, it significantly worsens patients' quality of life. The number of analgesic drugs used to relieve pain symptoms in CIPN is very limited and their efficacy in CIPN is significantly lower than that observed in other neuropathic pain types. Importantly, there are currently no recommended options for effective prevention of CIPN, and strong evidence for the utility and clinical efficacy of some previously tested preventive therapies is still limited.

METHODS

The present article is the second one in the two-part series of review articles focused on CIPN. It summarizes the most recent advances in the field of studies on CIPN caused by oxaliplatin, the third-generation platinum-based antitumor drug used to treat colorectal cancer. Pharmacological properties of oxaliplatin, genetic, molecular and clinical features of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy are discussed.

RESULTS

Available therapies, as well as results from clinical trials assessing drug candidates for the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy are summarized.

CONCLUSION

Emerging novel chemical structures-potential future preventative pharmacotherapies for CIPN caused by oxaliplatin are reported.

Mechanisms, Predictors, and Challenges in Assessing and Managing Painful Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the known predictors and pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in cancer survivors and the challenges in assessing and managing it.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO.

CONCLUSION

The research on chronic painful CIPN is limited. Additional research is needed to identify the predictors and pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic painful CIPN to inform the development of assessment tools and management options for this painful and possibly debilitating condition.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Recognition of the predictors of chronic painful CIPN and proactive CIPN assessment and palliative management are important steps in reducing its impact on physical function and quality of life.

Searching for analgesic drug candidates alleviating oxaliplatin-induced cold hypersensitivity in mice

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation, platinum-based derivative used to treat advanced colorectal cancer. Within the patient population on oxaliplatin therapy, a lower incidence of hematological adverse effects and gastrointestinal toxicity is noted, but severe neuropathic pain episodes characterized by increased cold and tactile hypersensitivity are present in ~95% of patients. This drug is also used to induce a rodent model of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)-related neuropathic pain which is widely used in the search for novel therapies for CIPN prevention and treatment. This paper provides a step-by-step, detailed description of the prevention and intervention protocols used in our laboratory for the assessment of oxaliplatin-induced cold allodynia in mice. To establish cold sensitivity in mice, the cold plate test was used. Latencies to pain reaction in response to cold stimulus (2.5°C) for vehicle-treated non-neuropathic mice, vehicle-treated mice injected with oxaliplatin (neuropathic control), and oxaliplatin-treated mice treated additionally with duloxetine are compared. Duloxetine is a serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor which was found to produce significant pain relief in patients with CIPN symptoms. In our present study, duloxetine administered intraperitoneally at the dose of 30 mg/kg served as a model antiallodynic drug which attenuated or partially prevented cold allodynia caused by oxaliplatin.

Neuroprotective and antihyperalgesic effects of orexin-A in rats with painful diabetic neuropathy

AIM OF STUDY

Diabetes mellitus is related to the development of neuronal tissue injury in different peripheral and central nervous system regions. A common complication of diabetes is painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDN). We have studied the neuroprotective and anti-nociceptive properties of neuropeptide orexin-A in an animal experimental model of diabetic neuropathy.

METHODS

All experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats (220-250 g). Diabetes was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of 55 mg/kg (i.p.) streptozotocin (STZ). Orexin-A was chronically administrated into the implanted intrathecal catheter (0.6, 2.5 and 5 nM/L, daily, 4 weeks). The tail-flick and rotarod treadmill tests were used to evaluate the nociceptive threshold and motor coordination of these diabetic rats, respectively. Cleaved caspase-3, Bax, Bcl2 and the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, as the biochemical indicators of apoptosis, were investigated in the dorsal half of the lumbar spinal cord tissue by western blotting method.

RESULTS

Treatment of the diabetic rats with orexin-A (5 nM/L) significantly attenuated the hyperalgesia and motor deficit in diabetic animals. Furthermore, orexin-A (5 nM/L) administration suppressed pro-apoptotic cleaved caspase-3 and Bax proteins. Also, orexin-A (5 nM/L) reduced the expression of Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in spinal cord dorsal half of rats with PDN.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether our data suggest that the orexin-A has anti-hyperalgesic and neuroprotective effects in rats with PDN. Cellular mechanisms underlying the observed effects may, at least partially, be related to reducing the neuronal apoptosis.

An updated understanding of the mechanisms involved in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy

The burdensome condition of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy occurs with various chemotherapeutics, including bortezomib, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel and vincristine. The symptoms, which include pain, numbness, tingling and loss of motor function, can result in therapy titrations that compromise therapy efficacy. Understanding the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is therefore essential, yet incompletely understood. The literature presented here will address a multitude of molecular and cellular mechanisms, beginning with the most well-understood cellular and molecular-level changes. These modifications include alterations in voltage-gated ion channels, neurochemical transmission, organelle function and intracellular pathways. System-level alterations, including changes to glial cells and cytokine activation are also explored. Finally, we present research on the current understanding of genetic contributions to this condition. Suggestions for future research are provided.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a review of recent findings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common, frequently chronic condition characterized by pain and decreased function. Given the growing number of cancer survivors and an increasing recognition of opioid therapy limitations, there is a need for critical analysis of the literature in directing an informed and thoughtful approach for the management of painful CIPN.

RECENT FINDINGS

A PubMed search for 'chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy AND pain' identifies 259 publications between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2017. Based on review of this literature, we aim to present a clinically relevant update of painful CIPN. Notably, the use of duloxetine as a first-line agent in treatment of CIPN is confirmed. Moreover, clinical trials focus on nonpharmacologic strategies for managing painful CIPN.

SUMMARY

Despite the volume of recent publications, there are limited preventive or therapeutic strategies for CIPN supported by high-level evidence. Duloxetine remains the only pharmacologic agent with demonstrated benefit; its clinical use should be routinely considered. Moving forward, nonopioid analgesic therapies will likely play an increasing role in CIPN treatment, but further research is necessary to confirm their utility. Promising therapies include vitamin B12 supplementation, physical therapy, and various forms of neuromodulation.

A double blind, placebo controlled, phase II randomised cross-over trial investigating the use of duloxetine for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant side effect of cancer treatment, potentially leading to early cessation of chemotherapy, enduring symptoms and long-lasting disability. Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies suggests that duloxetine, a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, may be effective in the symptomatic treatment of CIPN. This double blind, placebo controlled, phase II randomised cross-over trial aims to determine whether treatment with duloxetine results in a reduction in chronic neuropathic symptoms experienced as a result of neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment.

METHODS/DESIGN

Participants who have received neurotoxic chemotherapy and experience daily symptoms as a consequence of peripheral neuropathy will be randomly allocated to control or experimental group with a 1:1 allocation, stratified by chemotherapy type. The primary endpoint will be patient-reported CIPN symptoms, as assessed via the FACT/GOG-Ntx. As a secondary objective, the trial will investigate whether duloxetine improves neurophysiological parameters and functional status in patients who have received neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment.

DISCUSSION

This trial will investigate the effectiveness of duloxetine in reducing neuropathic symptoms following chemotherapy treatment, and aims to provide insight into the mechanisms underlying the symptomatic relief that duloxetine may provide. These results will be informative in advancing clinical knowledge regarding the treatment of CIPN.