A new index to simplify the screening of hypertension in overweight or obese youth

Static cutoffs or tables for the diagnosis of hypertension? Effect on identification of organ damage in youths with obesity

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently, the European Society of Cardiology task force released a Consensus document (ESC-CD) on pediatric hypertension (HTN) supporting the use of normative tables (age range 6-16 years) for the diagnosis of HTN, while the Hypertension Canada Guidelines (HTN-CGs) proposed static cutoffs. We aimed to assess the prevalence of HTN by ESC-CD or HTN-CGs and their association with glomerular function and left ventricular (LV) geometry in youths with overweight/obesity (OW/OB).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data of 3446 youths were analyzed. HTN by was defined using normative tables (ESC-CD) or static cutoffs of BP ≥ 120/80 in children (age <12 years) and ≥130/85 mmHg in adolescents (age ≥12 years) (HTN-CGs). Mildly reduced glomerular filtration rate was defined by GFR <90 ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Concentric LV hypertrophy (cLVH) was assessed in 500 youths and defined by LVH and high relative wall thickness as proposed by ESC-CD. Prevalence of HTN was 27.9% by ESC-CD and 22.7% by HTN-CGs. The association with mildly reduced glomerular filtration rate was significant only in hypertensive adolescents classified by HTN-CGs [Odds Ratio (OR), 95%Cl] 2.16 (1.44-3.24), whereas the association with cLVH was significant using both criteria: children OR 2.18 (1.29-3.67) by ESC-CD and 2.27 (1.32-3.89) by HTN-CGs; adolescents OR 2.62 (1.17-5.84) by ESC-CD and 2.83 (1.14-7.02) by HTN-CGs.

CONCLUSION

Although static cutoffs may represent a simplification for HTN identification, tables by ESC-CD detect a higher number of hypertensive youths before a clear appearance of glomerular impairment, which offers advantages in terms of primary cardiovascular prevention.

Guidelines for screening and managing hypertension in children

ABSTRACT

Pediatric hypertension has risen to an overall prevalence of 16.3%. If left untreated, hypertension in children and adolescents can have significant implications for cardiovascular and renal health into adulthood, including stroke, coronary artery disease, kidney disease, and heart failure. In 2017, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released updated guidelines for the screening, evaluation, and management of pediatric hypertension. This article reviews the definition of pediatric hypertension, describes why the guidelines were updated, and defines treatment protocol. By familiarizing themselves with and applying these guidelines, clinicians will be able to appropriately screen and manage hypertension in children to prevent morbidity into adulthood.

Exploration and Validation of the Performance of Hemoglobin A1c in Detecting Diabetes in Community-Dwellers With Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Diabetes can complicate hypertension management by increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. Studies targeting diabetes detection in hypertensive individuals demonstrating an increased risk of diabetes are lacking. We aimed to assess the performance of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and its cut-off point in detecting diabetes in the abovementioned population.

METHODS

Data from 4,096 community-dwellers with hypertension but without known diabetes were obtained from the Study on Evaluation of iNnovated Screening tools and determInation of optimal diagnostic cut-off points for type 2 diaBetes in Chinese muLti-Ethnic (SENSIBLE) study; these data were randomly split into exploration (70% of the sample) and internal validation (the remaining 30%) datasets. The optimal HbA1c cut-off point was derived from the exploration dataset and externally validated using another dataset from 2,431 hypertensive individuals. The oral glucose tolerance test was considered the gold-standard for confirming diabetes.

RESULTS

The areas under the ROC curves for HbA1c to detect diabetes were 0.842, 0.832, and 0.829 for the exploration, internal validation, and external validation datasets, respectively. An optimal HbA1c cut-off point of 5.8% (40 mmol/mol) yielded a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 74.5%. Individuals who were not diagnosed as having diabetes by HbA1c at 5.8% (40 mmol/mol) had a lower 10-year CVD risk score than those diagnosed as having diabetes (P=0.01). HbA1c≤5.1% (32 mmol/mol) and ≥6.4% (46 mmol/mol) could indicate the absence and presence of diabetes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HbA1c could detect diabetes effectively in community-dwellers with hypertension.

A new simple formula built on the American Academy of Pediatrics criteria for the screening of hypertension in overweight/obese children

We evaluated the performance of a new simple formula (NSF) for the screening of hypertension by American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines 2017 (AAPG₂₀₁₇) in children with overweight/obesity (OW/OB). The performance of the NSF and the modified blood pressure to height ratio (MBPHR3) thresholds against AAPG₂₀₁₇ was evaluated; both methods were also compared to assess the association with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (cLVH). The study included 3259 OW/OB children (5-13 years). Two centers served as learning sample (LS) (n = 1428), four centers served as validation sample (VS) (n = 1831), and the echocardiographic evaluation was available in 409 children in VS. The NSF was [1.5 × systolic blood pressure (mmHg) + diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)] - [(26 × height (m)] - age (years). A cut-off of the NSF ≥ 193 mmHg showed sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 0.92, 0.93, 0.83, and 0.97, respectively, versus the standard procedure. Against AAPG₂₀₁₇, the NSF showed higher specificity and positive predictive values than the MBPHR3 thresholds. Among hypertensive children defined by AAPG₂₀₁₇, NSF, or MBPHR3, the odds ratio (95%CI) for cLVH was respectively 1.73 (1.06-2.83), 1.69 (1.05-2.75), and 1.18 (0.75-1.85).Conclusions: The NSF shows a very high performance for the screening of OW/OB children at risk of hypertension and cLVH. What is Known: • The American Academy of Pediatrics released updated guidelines (AAPG 2017) to classify hypertension (HTN) in children. • The process needs categorization of height percentiles and comparison of blood pressure versus gender and age-adjusted values. What is New: • A user-friendly formula built on the AAPG 2017 was validated for the categorization of HTN in children with overweight/obesity. • The formula showed high performance in identifying children with HTN versus the standard procedure (sensitivity 0.92, specificity 0.93) and similar ability in identifying hypertensive children with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy versus the standard procedure (40% and 39% respectively).

Impact of the 2017 Blood Pressure Guidelines by the American Academy of Pediatrics in overweight/obese youth

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the impact of the European Society of Hypertension Guidelines 2016 (ESHG2016) and the American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines 2017 (AAPG2017) on the screening of hypertension and classification of abnormal left ventricular geometry (ALVG) in overweight/obese youth.

METHODS

This study included 6137 overweight/obese youth; 437 had echocardiographic assessment. Hypertension was defined using either ESHG2016 or AAPG2017. ALVG was defined using 95th percentile for age and sex of left ventricular mass index (LVMi) and/or relative wall thickness (RWT) more than 0.38 (juvenile cut-offs) according to ESHG2016 or LVMi more than 51 g/h and/or RWT more than 0.42 (adult cut-offs) according to AAPG2017.

RESULTS

Prevalence of youth at a high risk of hypertension was 13% higher using AAPG2017 than ESHG2016. The increase was larger in overweight youth at least 13 years of age (+43%). Using the juvenile cut-offs for ALVG, youth at a high risk of hypertension by ESHG2016 had an odds ratio [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] of 3.03 (1.31-7.05) for left ventricular concentric remodelling (LVcr) and 2.53 (1.43-4.47) for concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (cLVH) as compared with youth with normal LVG. Similarly, in youth at a high risk of hypertension by AAPG2017, the odds ratio for LVcr was 3.28 (1.45-7.41, P < 0.001) and 3.02 (95% CI: 1.73-5.27, P < 0.001) for cLVH. Using the adult cut-offs, no significant difference in ALVG was found with both guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of overweight/obese youth at a high risk of hypertension increased by 13% comparing AAPG2017 vs. ESHG2016. The juvenile cut-offs for ALVG were more effective than the adult criteria in intercepting individuals with a potentially higher cardiovascular risk.