Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% (Xibrom) for postoperative ocular pain and inflammation

A very early steroid responder after cataract surgery: a case report

BACKGROUND

Increased intraocular pressure (IOP), a side effect of corticosteroid eye drops, typically develops during the first few weeks of administration, and steroid response is not generally considered a cause of increased IOP immediately after cataract surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, I report a rare case of increased IOP due to steroid eye drops immediately after surgery. A man in his 80s presented with vision loss. Bilateral cataracts and pseudoexfoliation syndrome were confirmed. Postoperative eye drops including steroid eye drops were started immediately after cataract surgery in the right eye. High IOP was observed at the next and subsequent morning visits, but IOP normalized when steroid eye drops were discontinued. After surgery on the left eye, steroids were not administered postoperatively, and no increase in IOP was observed.

CONCLUSION

This case report highlights that a very early steroid response may be potential cause of elevated IOP immediately after cataract surgery.

Topical 0.1% Nepafenac versus 0.09% Bromfenac Eye Drops for Inflammation after Laser Peripheral Iridotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of 0.1% nepafenac versus 0.09% bromfenac eye drops in controlling inflammation after neodymium yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI).

DESIGN

Single-masked, single-center, randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and sixty eyes of patients with primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) and primary angle closure (PAC) undergoing bilateral LPI.

METHODS

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 0.1% nepafenac thrice daily or 0.09% bromfenac eye drops twice daily for 2 weeks after neodymium YAG LPI. Assessment was performed by masked investigators at 2 weeks after LPI. A Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS) questionnaire was administered both at baseline and 2 weeks after LPI. Subjective comfort scores to the study medications were assessed on the basis of a Likert scale at 2 weeks after LPI. In patients with bilateral PACS or PAC, the right eye was analyzed, and in asymmetrical disease (i.e., when one eye had PACS and the other eye had PAC), the eye with PAC was analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome (end point) was uncontrolled inflammation, defined as symptomatic inflammation within 1 week after LPI, the presence of anterior chamber cells at 2 weeks, or rebound inflammation after medication discontinuation. The secondary outcome was patient-reported comfort levels with study medications based on the GSS and Likert scale.

RESULTS

At 2 weeks after LPI, 7 patients (6 with PACS and 1 with PAC) in the nepafenac group and 2 patients with PACS in the bromfenac group achieved the primary end point, without a difference between the medication groups (P = 0.09). Post-LPI burning, smarting, and stinging was more common in the bromfenac group (P = 0.01), which also had a higher comfort score on the Likert scale (P = 0.004). The need for repeat LPI was comparable (10.0% in the nepafenac group vs. 15.4% in the bromfenac group; P = 0.22). A multivariate analysis revealed that a greater number of laser shots was associated with the need for repeat LPI (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.10; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical 0.09% bromfenac is noninferior to 0.1% nepafenac in controlling inflammation after LPI in eyes with PACS and PAC. Nepafenac may be associated with higher patient-reported comfort.

Comparative evaluation of once-daily and twice-daily dosing of topical bromfenac 0.09%: aqueous pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy study

PURPOSE

To evaluate aqueous pharmacokinetics of topical bromfenac 0.09% and compare clinical outcomes of once- and twice-daily dosing in phacoemulsification.

SETTING

Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional study.

METHODS

In phase I, single-drop aqueous pharmacokinetics of topical bromfenac was estimated at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in 60 eyes. In phase II, 45 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification were enrolled: group I (control, n = 15), group II (once-daily bromfenac, n = 14), and group III (twice-daily bromfenac, n = 16). Intraoperative pupillary miosis, postoperative anterior chamber (AC) flare, Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS), central macular thickness (CMT), and pain scores were assessed. Follow-up was performed at 1 day, 7 days, 28 days, and 90 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Half-life of topical bromfenac was 3.6 hours, mean residence time 5.5 hours, and peak concentration (63.73 ng/mL) achieved after 2 hours. Aqueous concentration was more than inhibitory concentration (IC50) at 12 hours but not at 24 hours. Cumulative effect was observed with repeated dosing with aqueous levels more than IC50 in once-daily and twice-daily groups at 5 days. Significant intraoperative miosis was observed in group I. Pain score, AC flare, and SOIS were significantly more in group I (P < .001) and comparable in groups II and III at all timepoints. CMT was comparable in all groups; no case developed cystoid macular edema.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose topical bromfenac did not maintain therapeutic aqueous concentration over 24 hours; however, cumulative effect was observed with repeated dosing. Clinical efficacy of once-daily and twice-daily dosing was comparable.

Dynamic monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 level as predictors of perceived pain during first and second phacoemulsification eye surgeries in patients with bilateral cataract

Background

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether dynamic monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) level might be as predictors of perceived pain during the first and second phacoemulsification eye surgeries in patients with bilateral cataract.

Methods

Consecutive bilateral cataract patients undergoing bilateral sequential phacoemulsification were retrospectively enrolled. Patients’ preoperative anxiety score and intraoperative pain score were registered. Aqueous humor samples were obtained during surgery. MCP-1 level in the aqueous humor was measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Elisa). Patients were assigned to seven subgroups based on the interval between first-eye and second-eye cataract surgery. Comparisons were performed for a subjective sensation and MCP-1 levels among different subgroups.

Results

pain score during second-eye surgery was significantly higher than during first-eye surgery. Whereas there was no statistical difference in anxiety score between both surgeries. Result from subgroups comparison showed that the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score was statistically greater in 1-group and 6-group during the second eye surgery. Anxiety score did not statistically differ in subgroups. Additionally, the second-eye MCP-1 level was significantly higher at week 1and 6 intervals. Preoperative MCP-1 level was positively correlated with perceiving pain score during both surgeries.

Conclusions

MCP-1 level in aqueous humor significantly correlated with perceived pain during cataract surgery. Dynamic MCP-1 level could function as predictors of perceived pain during the first and second phacoemulsification eye surgeries in patients with bilateral cataract, which might support clinicians in treatment optimization and clinical decision-making.

Comparing Combination Drop Therapy to a Standard Drop Regimen After Routine Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of a combined steroid/antibiotic/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drop relative to a regimen of multiple drops after cataract surgery.

SETTING

Single clinical practice in the USA.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized contralateral eye study.

METHODS

Subjects presenting for bilateral cataract surgery were enrolled with contralateral eyes randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Test eyes received a combination therapy (prednisolone acetate 1%, gatifloxacin 0.5%, and bromfenac sodium 0.075%) while control eyes received the same medications in separate drops (bromfenac sodium was 0.07%). Subjects were examined 1, 15 and 30 days after surgery. Visual acuities were measured, along with the refraction, intraocular pressure, patient pain and satisfaction, macular thickness and corneal pachymetry. The primary measure of interest was the change in macular thickness from baseline to the 15- and 30-day visits. The frequency and severity of reported ocular adverse events were tabulated for each group and compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-three subjects completed the study. Changes in central macular thickness were similar between groups, with only one control eye exhibiting significant macular edema. No differences in visual acuity, corneal edema, cells or flare were observed between groups. There were eight mild adverse events reported for all eyes of all subjects; the difference in the number of eyes experiencing adverse events was not statistically significantly different between groups (p ≥ 0.05 for all comparisons). While subjective symptoms were similar, all subjects indicated that they preferred the combination drop.

CONCLUSION

A combination drop showed similar efficacy to multiple drops and was overwhelmingly preferred by subjects.

Persistence of Inflammation After Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery: A 6-Month Laser Flare Photometry Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate, by laser photometry, the persistency of anterior chamber flare after uneventful phacoemulsification in asymptomatic patients with no signs of inflammation on slit lamp examination.

METHOD

Seventy-five patients previously enrolled in a randomized clinical trial that evaluated inflammation after uneventful phacoemulsification in eyes treated with dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension (group 1) or bromfenac 0.09% ophthalmic solution (group 2) for 2 weeks. Anterior chamber inflammation was investigated by laser flare photometry. At 30 days after surgery, laser flare showed persistently elevated values. For this reason, patients were further analyzed at 3 and 6 months. Additionally, optical coherence tomography was used to measure the central macular thickness (CMT) and to assess for postoperative pseudophakic macular edema.

RESULTS

When compared to preoperative values, laser flare photometry demonstrated persistent ocular inflammation at postoperative days 90 and 180 in group 1, but not in group 2. Laser flare values showed a significant reduction in group 2 compared to group 1 throughout all the follow-up (p < 0.001). The increase in mean CMT at days 90 and 180 with respect to baseline was statistically significant in group 1 but not in group 2, in which it decreased to levels similar to preoperative value. Group 1 showed a higher increase in mean CMT compared to group 2 throughout all the follow-up (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients that developed pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CME) was 14% (n = 5) and 0% (n = 0) in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p = 0.02). The bivariate analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between laser flare and CMT values in group 1 but not in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Anterior chamber inflammation persists for more than 30 days in a significant proportion of patients after uncomplicated cataract surgery and may be responsible for late onset of cystoid macular edema cases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03317847.

[Effectiveness of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in the treatment of chronic non-infectious blepharitis]

Anti-inflammatory therapy is a type of etiopathogenetic treatment of chronic mixed blepharitis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have pronounced anti-inflammatory effect comparable to the action of corticosteroids.

PURPOSE

To assess of the effectiveness of a NSAID - 0.09% bromfenac - in the treatment of chronic blepharitis of non-infectious etiology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 37 patients (74 eyes), 31 women (62 eyes) and 6 men (12 eyes) with chronic blepharitis. All patients underwent clinical, functional, instrumental and laboratory examination. The treatment of patients of the main group consisted of instillations of 0.09% bromfenac ('Broxinac', Sentiss, India) once per day and artificial tears with lipid component 3 times a day for 30 days. Patients in the control group only used artificial tears with lipid component 3 times a day for 30 days. The follow-up included examinations at one week, one and two months.

RESULTS

The positive clinical and functional response after treatment corresponded to optimization of the state of microvasculature in both groups, however, the dynamics of changes in the control group were less pronounced.

CONCLUSION

Elimination of microcirculatory disorders in the eyelids and signs of inflammation of the ocular surface determine the etiopathogenetic direction of using 0.09% bromfenac in the conservative treatment of chronic mixed blepharitis.

Topical Bromfenac Sodium in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative 0.09% bromfenac ophthalmic solution for the reduction of intraoperative miosis and pain in patients who have undergone femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

METHODS

This prospective randomized clinical study included 65 patients with senile cataracts in the absence of significant ocular comorbidity. The patients received 0.09% bromfenac ophthalmic solution or control placebo twice a day for 3 days before surgery. Pupil diameter was measured at the initiation and finalization of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, and pain quantification was assessed by an analogous pain scale after one day of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were randomly divided into two groups. Five patients were excluded due to defective coupling with the laser interface. Each of the 60 patients was randomized to receive preoperative topical treatment with either 0.09% bromfenac or 0.1% sodium hyaluronate. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups for age and gender. The mean change in horizontal and vertical pupil diameter from the preoperative to post-femtosecond laser measurements were significantly less in the bromfenac group than in the placebo group (0.43 ± 0.6 vs. 1.71 ± 0.9, P < 0.001 and 0.40 ± 0.6 vs. 1.78 ± 0.9, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with untreated patients, the quantification of pain one day after the procedure was significantly lower in the 0.09% bromfenac group (46.7% with a score of 3 vs. 50% with a score of 1, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The maintenance of pupil dilation and the prevention of miosis were more effective in the 0.09% bromfenac group than in the control group. Likewise, the greater control of postoperative pain represented an additional significant benefit.

Anterior Chamber Inflammation After Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bromfenac 0.09% to Dexamethasone 0.1

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of bromfenac 0.09% and dexamethasone 0.1% in the treatment of anterior chamber inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with senile cataracts and no other ocular comorbidities who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification were randomized 1:1 to receive dexamethasone ophthalmic suspension 0.1% or bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% for 2 weeks. All patients were examined on the day before surgery and postoperatively at day 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 14 and 30. Laser flare photometry was used to quantify anterior chamber inflammation and optical coherence tomography to measure macular thickness.

RESULTS

Bromfenac was as effective as dexamethasone in reducing inflammation in the anterior chamber of the eye. Laser flare increased the day after surgery and progressively decreased after starting the treatment with no statistically significant difference between dexamethasone and bromfenac at all time points. Visual acuity improved steadily after surgery in both groups. Mean macular thickness was similar in both the dexamethasone and bromfenac arms at 1 month.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term therapy with topical bromfenac alone is as effective as dexamethasone in low-risk cataract surgery patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03317847; EudraCT # 2016-004358-14.

FUNDING

Santa Maria Nuova Hospital IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07% Versus Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension 0.3% for Post-Cataract Surgery Inflammation: A Pilot Study of Identical Dosing Regimens with Pre-Surgical "Pulse" Dose

Introduction

This small pilot study is the first direct comparison of the currently marketed formulations of bromfenac (0.07% solution) and nepafenac (0.3% suspension) using identical dosing regimens and including an extra pre-surgical “pulse” dose in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Methods

Adults scheduled for unilateral phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation were randomly assigned to bromfenac 0.07% or nepafenac 0.3%, each given once-daily 1 day prior to surgery, on the day of surgery plus an extra dose 1 h before surgery, and for 14 days after surgery. Assessments included summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS), visual acuity (VA), and retinal thickness measured via optical coherence tomography.

Results

The study population included 49 patients (bromfenac, n = 24; nepafenac, n = 25). The percentage of patients with a SOIS = 0 (no cells or flare) at post-surgical day 15 (primary efficacy endpoint) was statistically similar between the bromfenac (57.1%) and nepafenac (50.0%) treatment groups (intent-to-treat with last observation carried forward) (P = 0.6318). The proportions of patients with an SOIS of 0 at days 3 and 8 were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the bromfenac group (23.8 and 52.4%, respectively) versus the nepafenac group (0.0 and 20.8%, respectively). Visual acuity was similar between groups at each study visit, as were mean retinal thickness and change from baseline in retinal thickness. Rescue medication (typically difluprednate) was given on or before day 15 to 13 patients in each treatment group (bromfenac, 54.2%; nepafenac, 52.0%). There were no adverse events considered to be related to either treatment.

Conclusions

The results of this small pilot study suggest that once-daily bromfenac 0.07% produces similar benefits with regard to postsurgical inflammation, VA, and retinal thickness as once-daily nepafenac 0.3%, and possibly has a faster onset of anti-inflammatory action, when compared using identical dosing regimens.

Funding

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.

Trial Registration

NCT03886779.

Comparison of Once-Daily Bromfenac 0.07% Versus Once-Daily Nepafenac 0.3% in Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification

AIM

Randomized pilot study comparing clinical outcomes with bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% versus nepafenac 0.3% ophthalmic suspension administered as identical dosing regimens in patients undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

METHODS

Forty-nine subjects were treated with bromfenac (n = 25) or nepafenac (n = 24) once daily starting 3 days before cataract surgery, continued on the day of surgery, and for 21 days following surgery, in addition to standard of care. Subjects were followed at 1 day and 7, 21, and 42 days postoperatively. Assessments included best-corrected visual acuity [Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)], summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS; anterior chamber cells plus flare grading), macular volume and thickness (spectral domain optical coherence tomography), intraocular pressure, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Treatment groups were similar at baseline. Outcomes for mean letters read (p = 0.20), mean change in macular volume (p = 0.98), and retinal thickness (p = 0.93) were not statistically different between the groups at day 42. Mean SOIS dropped markedly and similarly from post-surgical day 1 to day 7 in both treatment groups and was statistically equivalent to baseline in both groups by day 21. At day 42, 87% of subjects in the bromfenac group and 82% of subjects in the nepafenac group demonstrated stable or improved visual acuity. The proportions of eyes with mean retinal thickness of 10 µm or less at days 7, 21, and 42 were similar for the bromfenac (95.8%, 78.3%, 73.9%, respectively) and nepafenac (91.7%, 87.5%, 66.7%) groups (all p = NS, bromfenac vs. nepafenac).

CONCLUSION

Both bromfenac 0.07% and nepafenac 0.3% produced positive and similar clinical outcomes with regard to ETDRS visual acuity post-cataract surgery when dosed using identical regimens. Increases in mean retinal thickness and mean macular volume were small and similar between treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01847638.

FUNDING

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.

Ascorbic acid versus placebo in postoperative lid edema postphotorefractive keratectomy: A double-masked, randomized, prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is a proper type of refractive surgery used to remodel corneal stroma to compensate refractive errors. Corneal haze was reported as one of the side effects in several studies. This study was conducted for investigation of the effect of preventive effect of Vitamin C on eyelid edema, corneal haze, corneal epithelial healing, mitigation of pain, and epiphora.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study has been performed as a double-blind clinical trial on 51 patients who underwent PRK surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as follows: case group who received oral ascorbic acid 250 mg once daily for 7 days and control group that took placebo 3 days before and 4 days after the surgical operation. The patients underwent a surgical operation on day 0. Then, the following factors were evaluated as the main outcome: postoperative lid edema, pain, corneal haze, and corneal reepithelialization.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 28.52 ± 8.05 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of the subjective pain scores along with corneal haze and corneal reepithelialization between the treatment and placebo groups at any point during the postoperative period; however, there was a statistically significant difference and trend for lower lid edema in the ascorbic acids group on postoperative day 1 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that ascorbic acid may provide an alternative or add-on option for lid edema relief after PRK.

Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% as an adjunctive therapy to topical steroids after cataract surgery in pseudoexfoliation syndrome

PURPOSE

To study with laser flare photometry the antiinflammatory effect of bromfenac added to a topical steroid versus a topical steroid alone in patients with pseudoexfoliation (PXF) syndrome after cataract surgery.

SETTING

Ophthalmology Unit, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Patients with cataract and clinical signs of PXF were randomized to dexamethasone 0.1% and tobramycin 0.3% ophthalmic solution (Group 1) or with the adjunct of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% (Group 2). All patients were examined on the day of surgery (baseline) and postoperatively at 1, 3, 7, and 30 days. Laser flare photometry was used to quantify anterior chamber inflammation and optical coherence tomography to measure macular thickness.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included. Postoperatively, the mean flare was 31% lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 at 3 days (11.92 ph/msec ± 8.14 [SD] versus 17.13 ± 9.03 ph/msec; P = .025) and 43% lower at 7 days (10.77 ± 6.17 ph/msec versus 18.72 ± 12.37 ph/msec; P = .003). There were no significant differences in postoperative visual acuity, symptoms, or ocular pain between groups. The mean macular thickness 1 month after surgery was increased in Group 1 but not Group 2; the difference between groups was significant at 4 weeks (P = .03). The incidence of intraretinal cysts was higher in Group 1 (n = 4) than in Group 2 (n = 0).

CONCLUSION

The addition of bromfenac to topical steroids after cataract surgery in eyes with PXF was associated with greater reductions in inflammation than steroids alone.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Effects of Pranoprofen on Aqueous Humor Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Level and Pain Relief During Second-Eye Cataract Surgery

The aim of our present study is to evaluate the efficacy of pranoprofen eye drops as pain relief during sequential second-eye cataract surgery and to investigate the possible mechanism. Seventy-six patients scheduled for bilateral sequential cataract surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: (1) treatment group (administered pranoprofen eye drops), or (2) control group (administered artificial tears). Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative pain were assessed. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in the aqueous humor was measured with a suspension cytokine array. An extracapsular lens extraction model was established in the Wistar rat and the MCP-1 concentrations were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We found that in the control group, the pain scores were significantly higher during second-eye surgery than during first-eye surgery (both scores P < 0.001). In the treatment group, there was no significant difference in the pain scores during first-eye and second-eye surgery (both scores P > 0.1). The pain during second-eye surgery was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (both scores P < 0.01). And in the 1-week and 6-week interval subgroups, the pain scores during second-eye surgery were significantly lower in the treatment group than the control group (P = 0.047 and P = 0.035, respectively). While the second-eye MCP-1 level was significantly lower after a 1-week interval in the treatment group than in the control group (P = 0.012), but did not differ significantly after a 6-week interval (P > 0.1). A parallel trend in the MCP-1 concentration was detected in the rat model. In conclusion, the preoperative administration of pranoprofen eye drops reduced the perceived pain during second-eye cataract surgery, especially when performed after 1-week and 6-week intervals between the first-eye and second-eye surgery. MCP-1, a pain-related cytokine, was associated with the pain-relief mechanism of pranoprofen when second-eye surgery was performed 1 week after second-eye surgery.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus corticosteroids for controlling inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

Cataract is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Cataract surgery is commonly performed but can result in postoperative inflammation of the eye. Inadequately controlled inflammation increases the risk of complications. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids are used to prevent and reduce inflammation following cataract surgery, but these two drug classes work by different mechanisms. Corticosteroids are effective, but NSAIDs may provide an additional benefit to reduce inflammation when given in combination with corticosteroids. A comparison of NSAIDs to corticosteroids alone or combination therapy with these two anti-inflammatory agents will help to determine the role of NSAIDs in controlling inflammation after routine cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of topical NSAIDs (alone or in combination with topical corticosteroids) versus topical corticosteroids alone in controlling intraocular inflammation after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. To assess postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), patient-reported discomfort, symptoms, or complications (such as elevation of IOP), and cost-effectiveness with the use of postoperative NSAIDs or corticosteroids.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify studies relevant to this review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register (2016, Issue 12), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to December 2016), Embase Ovid (1947 to 16 December 2016), PubMed (1948 to December 2016), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database) (1982 to 16 December 2016), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com; last searched 17 June 2013), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov; searched December 2016), and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en; searched December 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which participants were undergoing phacoemulsification for uncomplicated cataract extraction. We included both trials in which topical NSAIDs were compared with topical corticosteroids and trials in which combination therapy (topical NSAIDs and corticosteroids) was compared with topical corticosteroids alone. The primary outcomes for this review were inflammation and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the full-text articles, extracted data from included trials, and assessed included trials for risk of bias according to Cochrane standards. The two review authors resolved any disagreements by discussion. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included 48 RCTs conducted in 17 different countries and two ongoing studies. Ten included studies had a trial registry record. Fifteen studies compared an NSAID with a corticosteroid alone, and 19 studies compared a combination of an NSAID plus a corticosteroid with a corticosteroid alone. Fourteen other studies had more than two study arms. Overall, we judged the studies to be at unclear risk of bias. NSAIDs alone versus corticosteroids aloneNone of the included studies reported postoperative intraocular inflammation in terms of cells and flare as a dichotomous variable. Inflammation was reported as a continuous variable in seven studies. There was moderate-certainty evidence of no difference in mean cell value in the participants receiving an NSAID compared with the participants receiving a corticosteroid (mean difference (MD) -0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.19 to 0.99), and there was low-certainty evidence that the mean flare value was lower in the group receiving NSAIDs (MD -13.74, 95% CI -21.45 to -6.04). Only one study reported on corneal edema at one week postoperatively and there was uncertainty as to whether the risk of edema was higher or lower in the group that received NSAIDs (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.29). No included studies reported BCVA as a dichotomous outcome and no study reported time to cessation of treatment. None of the included studies reported the proportion of eyes with cystoid macular edema (CME) at one week postoperatively. Based on four RCTs that reported CME at one month, we found low-certainty evidence that participants treated with an NSAID alone had a lower risk of developing CME compared with those treated with a corticosteroid alone (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.41). No studies reported on other adverse events or economic outcomes. NSAIDs plus corticosteroids versus corticosteroids aloneNo study described intraocular inflammation in terms of cells and flare as a dichotomous variable and there was not enough continuous data for anterior chamber cell and flare to perform a meta-analysis. One study reported presence of corneal edema at various times. Postoperative treatment with neither a combination treatment with a NSAID plus corticosteroid or with corticosteroid alone was favored (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.16). We judged this study to have high risk of reporting bias, and the certainty of the evidence was downgraded to moderate. No included study reported the proportion of participants with BCVA better than 20/40 at one week postoperatively or reported time to cessation of treatment. Only one included study reported on the presence of CME at one week after surgery and one study reported on CME at two weeks after surgery. After combining findings from these two studies, we estimated with low-certainty evidence that there was a lower risk of CME in the group that received NSAIDs plus corticosteroids (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.97). Seven RCTs reported the proportion of participants with CME at one month postoperatively; however there was low-certainty evidence of a lower risk of CME in participants receiving an NSAID plus a corticosteroid compared with those receiving a corticosteroid alone (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.06). The few adverse events reported were due to phacoemulsification rather than the eye drops.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found insufficient evidence from this review to inform practice for treatment of postoperative inflammation after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Based on the RCTs included in this review, we could not conclude the equivalence or superiority of NSAIDs with or without corticosteroids versus corticosteroids alone. There may be some risk reduction of CME in the NSAID-alone group and the combination of NSAID plus corticosteroid group. Future RCTs on these interventions should standardize the type of medication used, dosing, and treatment regimen; data should be collected and presented using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) outcome measures so that dichotomous outcomes can be analyzed.

Topical bromfenac for prevention and treatment of cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery: a review

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids, alone or in combination, have historically been used off label in the US to prevent and treat postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME). This literature review presents available data on the use of bromfenac 0.07% or 0.09% to prevent and treat CME following cataract surgery. Bromfenac is an NSAID approved to treat postoperative inflammation and reduce ocular pain following cataract surgery. Few cases of clinical CME were observed with bromfenac use in a total of 19 reviewed studies. There were no significant differences in CME incidence between bromfenac and corticosteroid-treated patients or between bromfenac- and bromfenac plus corticosteroid-treated patients. Bromfenac demonstrated comparable efficacy to other NSAIDs in preventing CME. Compared with corticosteroids, bromfenac alone or plus a corticosteroid showed similar or better efficacy in minimizing changes in retinal thickness and macular volume. In diabetic cataract surgery patients, bromfenac was comparable or superior to corticosteroids for minimizing changes in retinal thickness; also, combination therapy with bromfenac and corticosteroids may be associated with smaller changes in foveal thickness, macular thickness, and macular volume versus monotherapy with either treatment alone in this patient population. In two randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trials with bromfenac 0.07%, CME was reported as an adverse event in 0.5% and 1.5% of patients receiving bromfenac and placebo, respectively. In an analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with bromfenac 0.09%, macular edema was reported in 0.7% and 1.4% of patients receiving bromfenac and placebo, respectively. When evaluated as treatment for acute or chronic CME, bromfenac was associated with improvement in visual acuity and reduction in retinal thickness, but few studies are available. Overall, published data suggest that bromfenac is safe and effective when used to prevent or treat CME. Large-scale placebo-controlled trials and greater standardization of CME measures are needed to establish optimal bromfenac regimens for the prophylaxis and treatment of CME following cataract surgery.

Sustained-release dexamethasone for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone as a sustained-release drug depot when placed in the canaliculus for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain in cataract surgery patients.

SETTING

Four private practice sites in the United States.

DESIGN

Multicenter randomized double-masked clinical trial.

METHODS

Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either the sustained-release dexamethasone or a placebo vehicle punctum plug inserted into the inferior distal canaliculus of the operated eye intraoperatively during cataract surgery. The primary endpoints were the proportions of patients with absence of cells or pain in the anterior chamber at 8 days. Secondary endpoints included cells, flare, pain, and the presence of the device at various timepoints through 30 days.

RESULTS

Approximately one fifth (20.7%) of patients in the sustained-release dexamethasone group had an absence of anterior chamber cells at 8 days compared with 10.0% in the placebo group (P = .1495). A higher proportion of patients in the sustained-release dexamethasone group (79.3%) than in the placebo group (30.0%) had an absence of ocular pain at 8 days (P < .0001) and at all other timepoints (P < .0002). There were significantly higher proportions of patients in the sustained-release dexamethasone group than in the placebo group with an absence of anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, and pain at several timepoints through 30 days (P ≤ .0251).

CONCLUSION

Sustained-release dexamethasone provided elution of drug for up to 1 month after cataract surgery, providing clinically significant reductions in inflammation and pain.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Dr. Masket is a consultant to and shareholder in Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Bromfenac 0.09% bioavailability in aqueous humor, prophylactic effect on cystoid macular edema, and clinical signs of ocular inflammation after phacoemulsification in a Mexican population

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the aqueous humor bioavailability and clinical efficacy of bromfenac 0.09% vs nepafenac on the presence of cystoid macular edema (CME) after phacoemulsification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Phase II, double-blind, masked, active-controlled, multicenter, clinical trial of 139 subjects, randomized to either a bromfenac 0.09% ophthalmic solution (n=69) or nepafenac 0.1% (n=70). Subjects instilled a drop three times a day for a period of 30 days. Follow-up visits were on days 2, 7, 15, 30, and 60. Biomicroscopy, clinical ocular signs, and assessment of posterior segment were performed. The primary efficacy endpoints included the presence of CME evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Safety evaluation included intraocular pressure, transaminase enzymes, lissamine green, and fluorescein stain.

RESULTS

The demographic and efficacy variables were similar between groups at baseline. The presence of pain, photophobia, conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, cellularity, and corneal edema disappeared by day 30 in both groups. The central retinal thickness did not show significant changes after treatment when compared to baseline as follows: in the bromfenac group (247.2±32.9 vs 252.0±24.9 μm; P=0.958) and in nepafenac group (250.8±34 vs 264.0±34.1 μm; P=0.137), respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed between bromfenac and nepafenac group: (252.0±24.9 vs 264.0±34.1 μm; P=0.022), at day 30, respectively; even though there was no clinical relevance in the presentation of CME. There were no significant alterations in intraocular pressure, either lissamine green or fluorescein stains. The adverse events were not related to the interventions.

CONCLUSION

Bromfenac 0.09% ophthalmic solution showed similar clinical efficacy to reduce the presentation of CME after phacoemulsification compared to nepafenac 0.01%.

A comparative study of various topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to steroid drops for control of post cataract surgery inflammation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative inflammation continues to be a cause of patient discomfort, delayed recovery, and in some cases, suboptimal visual results. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and steroid are commonly used in the management and prevention of noninfectious ocular inflammation following cataract surgery.

AIMS

The aim was to study the safety and efficacy of various NSAIDs drops for control of postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery and compare with steroid eye drops in a patient following cataract surgery.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Totally, 200 patients undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation were randomly assigned to receive either nepafenac 0.1% 3 times daily, bromfenac 0.09% twice daily, ketorolac 0.5% 4 times daily for 1 month or 1% prednisolone eye drops as their postoperative anti-inflammatory medication with 50 cases in each group. The patients were examined at the 1^st day (baseline), 1^st week, 2^nd week, and 4^th week after surgery. Postoperative inflammation was evaluated subjectively by intraocular pressure, slit-lamp assessment of signs of inflammation, including conjunctival hyperemia, ocular pain, and aqueous cells and flare.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS program for Windows, version 17.0.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found that prednisolone 1% was more effective in controlling postoperative intraocular inflammation in terms of reducing anterior chamber cells and flare. We found that ketorolac 0.5% and nepafenac 0.1% were equally effective in controlling postoperative ocular pain and inflammation. All four drugs are effective in controlling post cataract surgery ocular inflammation. Intraocular inflammation is best controlled with prednisolone 1%, while ocular pain and hyperemia are better controlled with NSAIDs in the early postoperative periods.

Lipid-Based Therapy for Ocular Surface Inflammation and Disease

Ocular surface diseases such as dry eye, allergic keratoconjunctivitis, and infection are very prevalent conditions and involve ocular surface stress and inflammation. Recently, various lipid-based therapies have been advocated for the modulation of ocular surface inflammation. Here we review the latest developments and challenges of these strategies. These include administration of essential fatty acids, cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors and resolvin analogs. Lipids form part of the tear film and are crucial for tear film stability; loss of tear film stability can aggravate ocular surface inflammation. Strategies to replenish tear film lipids - namely, eyelid warming and eye drops containing natural or synthetic lipids - are evaluated. Recent advances in the use of lipids as ocular drug delivery vehicles, antioxidants, and diagnostic markers are discussed.

The Effects of Two Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, Bromfenac 0.1% and Ketorolac 0.45%, on Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the additive effects of two types of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), bromfenac 0.1% or ketorolac 0.45%, relative to topical steroid alone in cataract surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total 91 subjects scheduled to undergo cataract operation were randomized into three groups: Group 1, pre/postoperative bromfenac 0.1%; Group 2, pre/postoperative preservative-free ketorolac 0.45%; and Group 3, postoperative steroid only, as a control. Outcome measures included intraoperative change in pupil size, postoperative anterior chamber inflammation control, change in macular thickness and volume, and ocular surface status after operation.

RESULTS

Both NSAID groups had smaller intraoperative pupil diameter changes compared to the control group (p<0.05). There was significantly less ocular inflammation 1 week and 1 month postoperatively in both NSAID groups than the control group. The changes in central foveal subfield thickness measured before the operation and at postoperative 1 month were 4.30±4.25, 4.87±6.03, and 12.47±12.24 μm in groups 1 to 3, respectively. In the control group, macular thickness and volume increased more in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), compared to those without DM. In contrast, in both NSAID groups, NSAIDs significantly reduced macular changes in subgroups of patients with or without DM. Although three ocular surface parameters were worse in group 1 than in group 2, these differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Adding preoperative and postoperative bromfenac 0.1% or ketorolac 0.45% to topical steroid can reduce intraoperative miosis, postoperative inflammation, and macular changes more effectively than postoperative steroid alone.

Topical bromfenac for post-cataract extraction: A systematic review and pooled analysis

Bromfenac, a promising ophthalmic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been used once daily for postoperative ocular inflammation and pain with satisfying efficacy, however, no integrated conclusion on its safety in clinical settings has been drawn. The purpose of this pooled analysis is to investigate the safety and efficacy of once daily bromfenac for ocular inflammation and pain among patients after cataract extraction (CE). MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to September 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied topical bromfenac after CE were analyzed. Included studies were systemically reviewed, and effects were summarized using odds ratio (OR) with suitable effect model. Four RCTs involving 2294 participants were included. Topical bromfenac significantly increased the proportion of cleared ocular inflammation (OR, 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83–3.07; P <0.00001), ocular pain free (OR, 5.14; 95% CI, 4.07–6.49; P <0.00001), and decreased risk of overall adverse events (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38–0.58; P <0.00001). Bromfenac has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for postoperative pain and inflammation in subjects undergoing CE. This is evidenced by the lower incidence of adverse events and the low scores for ocular pain and inflammation across multiple RCTs. However, demographics, co-morbidities of study participants, and the amount of co-medication were not reported, these possible sources of heterogeneity should be examined in future clinical trials.

Efficacy and vitreous levels of topical NSAIDs

INTRODUCTION

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly prescribed medications and are routinely used for their analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Because of their potent cyclooxygenase-inhibitory activity, they can inhibit pro-inflammatory prostaglandin synthesis, leading to complex inflammatory cascades. NSAIDs have been broadly used systemically for many decades and have recently become commercially available in the form of topical ophthalmic formulations. NSAIDs are weak acids with pKa values mostly between 3.5 and 4.5 and are poorly water-soluble. New, aqueous ophthalmic solutions of NSAIDs that afford better tissue penetration have recently been developed. In ophthalmological practice, topical NSAIDs are mostly used to stabilize pupillary dilation during intraocular surgery, manage postoperative pain and inflammation, and treat pseudophakic cystoid macular edema.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the vitreous penetration of topical NSAIDs and their potential clinical applications in the treatment of retinal diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

A growing body of evidence suggests that NSAIDs may be beneficial in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and ocular tumors. Recent studies from our group and other authors have shown that the vitreous levels of NSAID exceed the median inhibitory concentration, which can significantly decrease vitreous PGE2 levels.

Comparing the Efficacy of Ophthalmic NSAIDs in Common Indications

Objective: To review the commercially available ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), identify opportunities for therapeutic substitutions within and outside of their Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications, and identify clinically superior drugs within the class for specific indications. Data Source: A PubMed search (1992 through January 2014) was performed on the terms diclofenac, ketorolac, flurbiprofen, bromfenac, and nepafenac. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Clinical trials, meta-analyses, and review articles were evaluated if they were written in English and pertained to human subjects. Studies were excluded if they were in vitro studies, solely evaluated pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties, did not relate to the topical ophthalmic route, did not evaluate the FDA-approved indications of any available ophthalmic NSAID, or compared a reviewed drug with a nonreviewed drug (without placebo comparison). Data Synthesis: A total of 67 articles met the criteria for evaluation. Article quality, study design, and dosing of the medications were assessed to determine the clinical applicability of the results. The quality of the article was determined using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence 1. Conclusions: Many formulations of the 5 reviewed NSAIDs have been studied across the 4 primary indications. These indications are (1) pain and inflammation associated with cataract surgery, (2) pain associated with corneal refractive surgery, (3) inhibition of intraoperative miosis, and (4) seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Several studies have directly compared drugs within this class and have identified instances in which certain selections are therapeutically superior or equivalent to another. This information provides practitioners with guidance in selecting an optimal medication.

Treatment Paradigm After Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Evaluation

PURPOSE

To compare 3 clinical variables, namely, visual recovery, anterior chamber inflammation, and macular edema, between 2 different regimens after uncomplicated cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, single-blind study at a single center, private, teaching practice in Las Vegas, NV.

METHODS

Patients randomized to group I (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, n = 113) received besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% and bromfenac 0.09%, whereas those randomized to group II (steroid, n = 109) received besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% and prednisolone acetate 1%.Preoperative evaluation included a baseline macular optical coherence tomography. Postoperative data collected included visual acuity, direct visual anterior segment cell and flare counts, and macular optical coherence tomographies. Foveal thickness and total macular volume were used to assess the presence of cystoid macular edema.

RESULTS

Visual recovery was statistically insignificant with P values at 0.7, 0.10, 0.2, and 0.7 at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months, respectively.The degree of anterior segment inflammation was not statistically significant (P = 0.8) between the studied populations.The foveal thickness (1 week, P = 0.8; 1 month, P = 0.2; 2 months, P = 0.2) and total macular volume (1 week, P = 0.7; 1 month, P = 0.1; 2 months, P = 0.2) were not statistically significant between the groups, and the observed power were 0.902 and 0.666, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that bromfenac was equally efficacious when compared with a potent topical steroid in restoring visual function, decreasing and resolving anterior chamber inflammation, and preventing the development of macular edema.

The efficacy of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% dosed once daily in achieving zero-to-trace anterior chamber cell severity following cataract surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% dosed once daily in achieving zero-to-trace (0–5 cells) anterior chamber cells, following cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

Methods

The study designed employed two Phase III, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trials of 440 subjects, randomized to either bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% (n=222) or placebo (n=218). Subjects self-dosed once daily, beginning 1 day before undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation (day –1) and again on the day of surgery (day 0) and for 14 days postoperatively. Follow-up was on days 1, 3, 8, and 15. The outcome measures included the percentage of subjects with zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells at each visit, as determined by the percentage of subjects with ≤5 anterior chamber cells, overall anterior chamber cell grades, and summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS) (combined anterior chamber cell and flare scores).

Results

The proportion of subjects with zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells was significantly higher in the bromfenac 0.07% group compared with the placebo group as early as day 3 (P=0.0007), continued at day 8 (P<0.0001), and through day 15 (P<0.0001). At day 15, 80.2% of subjects in the bromfenac 0.07% group achieved zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells compared with 47.2% of subjects who did so in the placebo group. The overall anterior chamber cell scores were significantly lower in the bromfenac 0.07% group compared with the placebo group at days 3, 8, and 15 (P<0.0001 at each visit). The SOIS were also significantly lower in the bromfenac group compared with the placebo group at days 3, 8, and 15 (P<0.0001 at each visit).

Conclusion

Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07%, dosed once daily was clinically effective in achieving zero-to-trace anterior chamber cell severity after cataract surgery and was superior to placebo in all anterior chamber cell severity and inflammation outcome measures.

Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of topically applied nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in retinochoroidal tissues in rabbits

Purpose

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of topically applied nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the retinochoroidal tissues of rabbits.

Methods

The cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitory activity of diclofenac, bromfenac, and amfenac, an active metabolite of nepafenac, were determined using human-derived COX-1 and COX-2. Each of the three NSAIDs was applied topically to rabbits, and after 0.5 to 8 hrs, the concentration of each drug in the aqueous humor and the retinochoroidal tissues was measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs in the tissues after repeated doses as is done on patients was calculated by a simulation software. The inhibitory effect of each NSAID on the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier was assessed by the vitreous protein concentration on concanavalin A-induced retinochoroidal inflammation in rabbits.

Results

The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of diclofenac, bromfenac, and amfenac was 55.5, 5.56, and 15.3 nM for human COX-1, and 30.7, 7.45, and 20.4 nM for human COX-2, respectively. The three NSAIDs were detected in the aqueous humor and the retinochoroidal tissue at all-time points. Simulated pharmacokinetics showed that the levels of the three NSAIDs were continuously higher than the IC₅₀ of COX-2, as an index of efficacy, in the aqueous humor, whereas only the bromfenac concentration was continuously higher than the IC₅₀ at its trough level in the retinochoroidal tissues. The intravitreous concentration of proteins was significantly reduced in rabbits that received topical bromfenac (P = 0.026) but not the other two NSAIDs.

Conclusions

Topical bromfenac can penetrate into the retinochoroidal tissues in high enough concentrations to inhibit COX-2 and exerts its inhibitory effect on the blood-retinal barrier breakdown in an experimental retinochoroidal inflammation in rabbits. Topical bromfenac may have a better therapeutic benefit than diclofenac and nepafenac for retinochoroidal inflammatory diseases.

Efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors in controlling inflammation and capsular opacification after phacoemulsification cataract removal

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of 0.9% bromfenac (Xibrom™) or a celecoxib-impregnated intraocular lens (celecoxib-IOL) compared with 1% prednisolone acetate (PA) in controlling postoperative inflammation and posterior capsule opacification (PCO).

ANIMAL STUDIED

Fifty-nine dogs undergoing cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.

PROCEDURE

Bilateral patients received bromfenac or celecoxib-IOL plus PA in one eye, and PA in the contralateral eye. Unilateral patients received bromfenac or PA. Complete ophthalmic examination including tonometry, slit-lamp grading of flare and PCO, and digital image acquisition for masked PCO evaluation was performed within 24 h and 1, 4, 12, 24, and 56 weeks following surgery.

RESULTS

Celecoxib-IOL/PA-treated eyes had significantly less flare than PA-treated eyes, which had significantly less flare than bromfenac-treated eyes 24 h postoperatively. There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) postoperatively, or at 1, 24, or 56 weeks. Celecoxib-IOL/PA-treated eyes had significantly lower IOP measurements than bromfenac and PA-treated eyes at 4 and 12 weeks. There was no significant difference in PCO level between groups using slit-lamp biomicroscopy at any time point. Masked evaluation of digital images revealed significantly less PCO in celecoxib-IOL/PA- vs. bromfenac-treated eyes at 4 weeks, and in bromfenac- vs. PA-treated eyes at 56 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes receiving celecoxib-IOL/PA had better initial control of inflammation. Bromfenac was equally effective compared with PA in controlling inflammation. There was no association between COX-2 inhibitor administration and ocular hypertension. Celecoxib-IOL/PA-treated eyes showed better initial control of PCO (up to 12 weeks), while eyes receiving bromfenac had better long-term control of PCO (56 weeks).

Bromfenac ophthalmic solution for the treatment of postoperative ocular pain and inflammation: safety, efficacy, and patient adherence

Ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used by clinicians to manage ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery. Over the past decade, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved multiple topical NSAIDs for these purposes, including several reformulated products. One of these medications, bromfenac ophthalmic solution, has a long and extensive history, with proven efficacy and safety in patients following cataract surgery. The evolution of bromfenac ophthalmic solution over the years has involved either lowering the concentration of the active ingredient or extending the dosing interval to improve patient adherence/compliance. This review will focus on the history and progression of bromfenac ophthalmic solution and report the available patient preference and adherence data regarding this ocular NSAID throughout its evolution.

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for macular edema

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are nowadays widely used in ophthalmology to reduce eye inflammation, pain, and cystoid macular edema associated with cataract surgery. Recently, new topical NSAIDs have been approved for topical ophthalmic use, allowing for greater drug penetration into the vitreous. Hence, new therapeutic effects can be achieved, such as reduction of exudation secondary to age-related macular degeneration or diabetic maculopathy. We provide an updated review on the clinical use of NSAIDs for retinal diseases, with a focus on the potential future applications.

Efficacy and safety of indomethacin 0.1% eye drops compared with ketorolac 0.5% eye drops in the management of ocular inflammation after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To determine whether indomethacin 0.1% eye drops are at least as effective as ketorolac 0.5% eye drops in treating ocular inflammation following cataract surgery.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial. Cataract patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive indomethacin or ketorolac administered QID for 3 weeks beginning 1 day before surgery. The primary end-point was aqueous flare measured by laser flare meter at postoperative Days 1 and 7. Secondary end-points included retinal thickness, slit lamp and funduscopic examinations and postsurgical pain ratings. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were included in the per protocol population (n = 43 per treatment group). Indomethacin was found non-inferior to ketorolac for comparison of aqueous flare at postoperative Days 1 and 7 (Day 1: 95% CI: -2.37, 5.50; non-inferiority upper margin, 15 ph/ms and Day 7: 95% CI: -7.83, -0.94; non-inferiority upper margin, 8 ph/ms) and statistically better than ketorolac at Day 7 (p = 0.013). There were no significant between-group differences in aqueous flare and change from baseline in retinal thickness at postoperative Days 30 and 90. Indomethacin showed a higher subjective tolerance rating than ketorolac at postoperative Days 7 and 30 (p ≤ 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Indomethacin 0.1% was at least as effective as ketorolac 0.5% at Day 1 and more effective than ketorolac 0.5% at Day 7 in treating ocular inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Indomethacin was better tolerated than ketorolac. There were no clinically meaningful safety concerns with either treatment.

Comparative assessment of the cytotoxicity of six anti-inflammatory eyedrops in four cultured ocular surface cell lines, as determined by cell viability scores

Purpose

Anti-inflammatory eyedrops are often used in the treatment of corneal epithelial disorders. In the present study, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of six anti-inflammatory eyedrops in four ocular surface cell lines.

Methods

The cytotoxicity of six commercially available anti-inflammatory ophthalmic solutions (ie, diclofenac, bromfenac, pranoprofen, betamethasone, and fluoromethorone) was assessed in three corneal cell lines and one conjunctival cell line. Cell viability was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2 thiazoyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide and neutral red assays after exposing the cells to 10, 30, and 60 minutes of onefold, twofold, and tenfold dilutions of the drugs. Cytotoxicity was compared using the cell viability score (CVS), an integrated cytotoxic parameter that takes various factors into account, such as dilution by tear fluid or concentration by evaporation, drug exposure time, and ocular surface cell type.

Results

Based on the CVS scores, the order of the anti-inflammatory eyedrops tested from least to most cytotoxic, with the active ingredient %CVS₅₀, and %CVS_40/80 for each solution given in parentheses, was as follows: Rinderon^® (betamethasone, 100%, 100%) >0.02% Flumethoron^® (fluoromethorone, 68%, 22%) = 0.1% Flumethoron^® (fluoromethorone, 76%, 22%) >Bronuck^® (0.1% bromfenac, 53%, −8%) = Diclod^® (0.1% diclofenac, 44%, −15%) = Niflan^® (pranoprofen, 50%, −19%). Rinderon^® exhibited the least toxicity of all the anti-inflammatory eyedrops tested. Eyedrops containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs exhibited greater cytotoxicity than those containing steroids with benzalkonium at comparable concentrations. Concentration was the most significant factor affecting cell viability.

Conclusion

The cytotoxicity of the anti-inflammatory eyedrops evaluated in the present study depended on both the pharmaceutical components and preservatives. The CVS is a concise indicator of drug cytotoxicity.

Pain and Its Determinants in Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

To assess the determinants of early postoperative pain in photorefractive keratectomy.

DESIGN

A prospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

One hundred and four myopic-astigmatic patients undergoing bilateral standard photorefractive keratectomy were evaluated for early postoperative pain severity. On day 1 postoperatively, the level of pain experienced was reported by the patient on a visual analog scale of 0 to 10. At the preoperative interview, data were collected on clinical, demographic, and social characteristics to find potential pain determinants.

RESULTS

The median reported pain level was 3. About 20% of subjects reported a pain score of 6 or higher, and 2.9% (6 eyes of 4 patients) reported the highest pain score. The presence of external eye inflammatory signs was associated with higher levels of pain (P < 0.001). Patients with a higher body mass index reported more severe pain (P = 0.006). An inverse association was found between pain and harmful lifestyle choices (P = 0.008). Demographic characteristics, history of contact lens wear, history of major operation, past experience of severe pain, knowledge about the operation's adverse effects, preoperative insomnia, preoperative anxiety, operative factors, and refractive indices were not related to the severity of pain experienced (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The association of pain with ocular surface inflammation suggests that inflammatory processes have a role in early postoperative pain, supporting the use of anti-inflammatory agents for pain management. Prescription of weight-adjusted dosages of analgesics is recommended on the basis of the association between severity of postoperative pain and body mass index.

Prophylactic nepafenac and ketorolac versus placebo in preventing postoperative macular edema after uneventful phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic ketorolac 0.5% versus nepafenac 0.1% versus placebo on macular volume 1 month after uneventful phacoemulsification and evaluate the health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) of topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the context of cataract surgery.

SETTING

Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

DESIGN

Prospective placebo-controlled parallel-assignment double-masked randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

In this study, patients 18 years or older scheduled for routine phacoemulsification were randomized to a placebo, ketorolac 0.5%, or nepafenac 0.1% and dosed 4 times a day starting 1 day before surgery and continuing for 4 weeks. Spectral-domain macular cube ocular coherence tomography scans measuring central subfield thickness, macular cube volume, and average macular cube thickness were performed at baseline and 1 month postoperatively. The HRQOL metrics were determined with the Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for Tolerability (COMTOL) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Each study group comprised 54 patients. One month postoperatively, although a trend toward significance occurred for nepafenac and ketorolac, analysis of the means of differences showed no statistically significant differences between the 3 study groups (P=.2901). The COMTOL analysis found no difference in tolerability, compliance, side-effect frequency and bother, and effects on HRQOL between ketorolac and nepafenac compared with the placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

One month after uneventful phacoemulsification, there was no difference in macular volume between the placebo, ketorolac, and nepafenac. Ketorolac and nepafenac were well tolerated with minimal side-effect profiles. Thus, for patients without risk factors having routine surgery, prophylactic topical NSAIDs are not recommended.

Comparison of bromfenac 0.09% QD to nepafenac 0.1% TID after cataract surgery: pilot evaluation of visual acuity, macular volume, and retinal thickness at a single site

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% once daily (QD) and nepafenac 0.1% ophthalmic suspension three times daily following cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation, specifically looking at any differences in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuities, macular volume, and/or retinal thickness changes.

Methods

Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either bromfenac (n = 10) QD or nepafenac (n = 10) three times daily. Dosing began 3 days before cataract surgery, continuing to day 21 postsurgery. In addition to the investigated nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug regimen, all subjects received antiinfective intraoperative and postoperative standard of care. Subjects were followed at 1 day and 1, 3, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Study visit assessments included best-corrected visual acuity, biomicroscopy, summed ocular inflammation score (anterior chamber cells and flare grading), intraocular pressure measurement, adverse event recording, and concomitant medication review. Optical coherence tomography was performed at 1, 3, and 6 weeks.

Results

Both treatment groups had similar baseline measurements. Outcomes for mean letters read (P = 0.318), mean change in macular volume (P = 0.665), and retinal thickness (P = 0.552) were not statistically different between the groups from baseline through week six, although independently only the bromfenac group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in letters gained from baseline to week six (P = 0.040). In the same time period, mean macular volume and retinal thickening worsened in the nepafenac group, demonstrating a statistically significant increase (P = 0.006) at week six for macular volume when compared to baseline. One subject in the nepafenac group experienced recurrent inflammation at week six, was unmasked, and then rescued with bromfenac 0.09% QD and difluprednate 0.05% QD.

Conclusion

Both bromfenac and nepafenac resulted in positive clinical outcomes of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuities. Postoperative measurements of macular volume and retinal thickness of bromfenac subjects showed a trend toward improved vision, less retinal thickening, and more stable macular volumes overall.

Prostaglandin E2 inhibition of ketorolac 0.45%, bromfenac 0.09%, and nepafenac 0.1% in patients undergoing phacoemulsification

INTRODUCTION

We compared the prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) inhibition of three topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): ketorolac 0.45%, bromfenac 0.09%, and nepafenac 0.1% at peak dosing levels in patients previously scheduled to undergo phacoemulsification.

METHODS

This was a single-center, double-masked observational study of 121 patients randomized to one of three NSAID treatment arms. Patients were instructed to take the NSAID per on-label dosing (twice daily [b.i.d.] for ketorolac 0.45% and bromfenac 0.09%, three times a day [t.i.d.] for nepafenac 0.1%) for 1 day before surgery, and were to instill one drop the morning of surgery. Each patient received an additional four doses 1 hour prior to undergoing phacoemulsification. After completion of the paracentesis site with a super blade, aqueous humor (0.15 mL) was collected through the peripheral clear cornea with a 30 G needle attached to a tuberculin (TB) syringe. Aqueous humor samples were stored at -40°C prior to analysis, and diluted 1:10 with diluent. Assays were conducted on multiple plates in duplicate (seven standards per plate).

RESULTS

The mean (±SD) PGE(2) concentrations were 224.8±164.87 pg/mL for ketorolac 0.45% (n=42), 288.7±226.05 pg/mL for bromfenac 0.09% (n=41), and 320.4±205.6 pg/mL for nepafenac 0.1% (n=38). The difference between ketorolac 0.45% and nepafenac 0.1% was statistically significant (P=0.025). The difference between bromfenac 0.09% and nepafenac 0.1% was not significantly different (P=0.516).

CONCLUSIONS

Ketorolac 0.45% achieved the greatest inhibition of PGE(2) compared to nepafenac 0.1% and bromfenac 0.09%. Ketorolac 0.45% may be more efficacious at controlling inflammation at the time of cataract surgery versus nepafenac 0.1% and bromfenac 0.09%.

A randomized comparison of to-aqueous penetration of ketorolac 0.45%, bromfenac 0.09% and nepafenac 0.1% in cataract patients undergoing phacoemulsification

OBJECTIVE

To compare the peak to-aqueous penetration of three nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: ketorolac tromethamine 0.45%, bromfenac 0.09%, nepafenac 0.1%, and amfenac (the active metabolite of nepafenac) in patients undergoing phacoemulsification.

METHODS

A single center, double-masked study randomized 122 patients to receive one of three treatment arms. On-label dosing of ketorolac (BID), bromfenac (BID), and nepafenac (TID) was instructed for 1 day prior to surgery. Patients were instructed to instill one drop the morning of surgery. The patients received four additional doses 1 hour prior to phacoemulsification. After completion of the paracentesis site with a superblade, aqueous humor (0.15 cc) was collected through the peripheral clear cornea with a 30-gauge needle attached to a TB syringe. Following collection, aqueous samples were stored at -40°C prior to analysis. Drug concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry using positive turbo-ion spray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring mode for quantification. An independent sample Student's t-test was used to detect between-group differences.

RESULTS

The peak aqueous concentration of ketorolac 0.45% was 10 times the concentration of bromfenac 0.09%, and five times the concentration of and 54% greater than the metabolically inactive nepafenac 0.1%. The mean peak aqueous concentration of ketorolac 0.45% was 688.87 ± 749.6 ng/ml. Bromfenac achieved a mean peak aqueous concentration of 67.64 ± 62.4 ng/ml. The mean peak aqueous concentrations of nepafenac and amfenac were 447.10 ± 225.7 ng/ml and 140.37 ± 56.6 ng/ml, respectively. The peak concentration of ketorolac was statistically significantly greater than bromfenac (P ≤ 0.0005), nepafenac (P ≤ 0.05), and amfenac (P ≤ 0.005). A limitation of this study is that aqueous samples were collected just prior to surgery and not during the postoperative period due to ethical considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketorolac 0.45% achieved significantly greater aqueous concentrations when compared to bromfenac 0.09% and the active metabolite of nepafenac 0.1% (amfenac) in patients undergoing phacoemulsification.

Evaluation of analgesic efficacy of bromfenac sodium ophthalmic solution 0.09% versus ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5% following LASEK or Epi-LASIK

Background

To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of bromfenac sodium ophthalmic solution 0.09% compared with ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5% in laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) or epithelial keratomileusis (epi-LASEK), sometimes referred to as epi-LASIK.

Methods

Eighty eyes (from 40 patients, 18 men and 22 women) undergoing bilateral simultaneous LASEK or epi-LASEK were randomized to receive ketorolac in one eye and bromfenac in the other. Mean age was 33.13 ± 9.34 years. One drop of bromfenac or ketorolac was instilled in each eye 15 minutes and one minute prior to surgery, and two and four hours following surgery. Patients were instructed to instill the medications on-label each day through postoperative day 4. The subjects completed pain and visual blurriness assessments from day of surgery to postoperative day 4. Uncorrected visual acuity was tested on postoperative days 1 and 6.

Results

For each of the five days, pain scores for bromfenac-treated eyes were significantly less than that for ketorolac-treated eyes (P < 0.01). Of the 40 patients, 32 (80%) said bromfenac provided better postoperative analgesia than ketorolac. There was no statistically significant difference in visual blurriness scores between the two groups (P > 0.1). Uncorrected visual acuity did not vary significantly between the treatment groups (P > 0.1). No serious adverse events were noted.

Conclusion

Bromfenac is subjectively superior to ketorolac in reducing postoperative pain following LASEK or epi-LASEK. The subjects tolerated the drugs well with no serious adverse outcomes and no difference in uncorrected visual acuity.

Phase II placebo-controlled study of nepafenac ophthalmic suspension 0.1% for postoperative inflammation and ocular pain associated with cataract surgery in Japanese patients

Objective

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of nepafenac ophthalmic suspension compared to placebo in the management of postoperative inflammation and ocular pain in Japanese patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Methods

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical study. Patients received nepafenac or placebo TID beginning 1 day before cataract surgery and continuing on the day of surgery for 14 days. One additional drop was administered on the day of surgery. The primary efficacy variables were the percentage of patients cured at postoperative day 14 visit (cure defined as aqueous cells score + aqueous flare score = 0) and the percentage of patients who were pain free at all postoperative visits.

Results

The cure rate on day 14 after surgery was 71.4% (75/105) in the nepafenac group and 28.6% (30/105) in the placebo group, showing a significant difference in cure rate between groups. The nepafenac group demonstrated higher cure rates than those in the placebo group, with a significant difference in cure rate on days 7 and 14 postoperatively. The ocular pain-free rate was 96.2% (102/106) in the nepafenac group and 67.6% (71/105) in the placebo group, showing a significant difference between groups. Concerning adverse events (AEs), 26 AEs were reported in 21 subjects (19.6%) in the nepafenac group and 31 AEs were reported in 24 subjects (22.4%) in the placebo group.

Conclusion

Nepafenac ophthalmic suspension is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug effective in the prevention of postoperative inflammation and ocular pain associated with cataract surgery.

Once daily dosing of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% for postoperative ocular inflammation and pain

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and ocular safety of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% dosed once daily for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain following cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

METHODS

A total of 455 subjects (455 study eyes: 230 bromfenac, 225 placebo) were enrolled in two randomized double-masked, placebo-controlled, clinical trials at 64 ophthalmology clinics in the United States. Subjects were randomized to receive either bromfenac 0.09% or placebo dosed once daily. Dosing began 1 day before cataract surgery (Day -1), continued on day of surgery (Day 0), and for 14 days following surgery. Evaluations were completed on Days 1, 3, 8, 15 and 22. The primary efficacy endpoint was cleared summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS) by Day 15. The secondary efficacy endpoint was the number of subjects who were pain-free at Day 1.

RESULTS

The bromfenac 0.09% group was significantly higher compared to the placebo group in the primary endpoint of the proportion of subjects who had cleared ocular inflammation by Day 15 (P < 0.0001). The mean SOIS for the bromfenac 0.09% group was lower than the placebo group at Days 3, 8, 15, and 22 (P < 0.0001). More bromfenac 0.09% subjects were pain free at Days 1, 3, 8, and 15 (P < 0.0001). Fewer subjects in the bromfenac 0.09% group withdrew from the clinical trials due to lack of efficacy at Day 15 (P < 0.0001). Fewer adverse events were reported in the bromfenac 0.09% group than the placebo group. Limitations included advanced age, female predominance, and surgical nuances among cataract surgeons, making cross-trial comparisons difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% dosed once daily is clinically safe and effective for the treatment of ocular inflammation and the reduction of ocular pain associated with cataract surgery.

Safety and efficacy of bromfenac ophthalmic solution (Bromday) dosed once daily for postoperative ocular inflammation and pain

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and ocular safety of bromfenac ophthalmic solution (bromfenac) 0.09% dosed once daily for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain after cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled or active-controlled, multicenter, clinical trials.

PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS

A total of 872 subjects (872 study eyes: bromfenac in 584, placebo in 288).

METHODS

Four randomized, double-masked, vehicle or active-controlled, clinical trials were conducted at 134 ophthalmology clinics in the United States. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years were randomized to receive either bromfenac 0.09% or placebo dosed once daily beginning 1 day before cataract surgery (day -1), continuing on the day of surgery (day 0), and continuing for an additional postoperative 14 days. Subjects were evaluated for efficacy and safety on days 1, 3, 8, 15, and 22. The primary efficacy end point was cleared ocular inflammation, measured by the summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS; anterior chamber cells and flare) by day 15. The secondary efficacy end point was the number of subjects who were pain-free at day 1. The data from the 4 trials were pooled for analyses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The SOIS and ocular pain.

RESULTS

The proportion of subjects who had cleared ocular inflammation by day 15 was significantly higher in the bromfenac 0.09% group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). The mean SOIS in the bromfenac 0.09% group was significantly lower than in the placebo group at days 3, 8, 15, and 22 (P < 0.0001). The proportion of subjects who were pain-free at days 1, 3, 8, and 15 was significantly higher in the bromfenac 0.09% group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). The incidence of adverse events reported in the bromfenac 0.09% group was significantly lower than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). On day 15, 84.0% of the bromfenac subjects had ≥ 1-line improvement in visual acuity compared with 66.1% of placebo subjects (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bromfenac 0.09% dosed once daily was clinically safe and effective for reducing and treating ocular inflammation and pain associated with cataract surgery.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Efficacy and safety of bromfenac for the treatment of corneal ulcer pain

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% (Xibrom™, ISTA Pharmaceuticals Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) for treating pain associated with corneal ulcers.

METHODS

Twenty-five eyes of 24 patients with corneal infiltrates (bacterial or fungal) were treated with appropriate anti-infective agents along with bromfenac twice daily for up to 102 days to treat the pain caused by the infection. Follow-up visits were frequent in the first 2 weeks upon initiation of treatment, then at least weekly until infections were resolved. The best corrected visual acuity, location, size, and density of corneal infiltrates, the size and presence of a corneal epithelial defect, subjective eye pain (scale of 0-4) and time to pain resolution, the ability to conduct daily activities, and adverse events were recorded at each follow-up visit. The results of these treated patients were compared with those of 10 control eyes with corneal infiltrates (bacterial or fungal) where appropriate anti-infectives were used without adjunct medications.

RESULTS

Fifty-two percent of bromfenac-treated patients reported no pain by day 3, compared with 0% of untreated controls (P=0.023). Most of the treated patients' epithelium healed by day 20 (68%) compared with only 10% of controls (P=0.040). Most bromfenac-treated patients (71%) returned to normal activities within 2 days of starting treatment with bromfenac, compared with 0% of controls (P=0.018). No adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Bromfenac was effective in treating pain associated with infectious keratitis and did not delay corneal epithelialization nor cause any corneal adverse events in this group of 25 eyes.

Difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Durezol) administered two times daily for managing ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Durezol(®)) versus placebo administered before surgery for managing inflammation and pain following cataract extraction.

METHODS

Eligible subjects (N = 121) were randomized 2:1 to topical treatment with 1 drop difluprednate or placebo administered twice daily for 16 days, followed by a 14-day tapering period. Dosing was initiated 24 hours before unilateral ocular surgery. Clinical signs of inflammation (anterior chamber [AC] cell and flare grade, bulbar conjunctival injection, ciliary injection, corneal edema, and chemosis), ocular pain/discomfort, intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Clearing of inflammation on day 14 (primary endpoint), defined as an AC cell grade of 0 (≤5 cells) and a flare grade of 0 (complete absence), was achieved in a significantly greater percentage of subjects treated with difluprednate, compared with placebo (74.7% vs 42.5%; P = 0.0006). A significantly greater percentage of difluprednate-treated subjects were free of ocular pain/discomfort on day 14 than placebo-treated subjects (64.6% vs 30.0%; P = 0.0004). Three subjects (3.7%) in the difluprednate group had a clinically significant IOP rise (defined as ≥21 mmHg and a change from baseline ≥10 mmHg at same visit).

CONCLUSIONS

Difluprednate, administered 2 times daily starting 24 hours before cataract surgery, was highly effective for managing ocular inflammation and relieving pain and discomfort postoperatively. Difluprednate was well tolerated and provides a convenient twice-daily option for managing postoperative ocular inflammation.

Evaluating exaggerated, prolonged, or delayed postoperative intraocular inflammation

PURPOSE

To provide a diagnostic approach for the evaluation of patients with exaggerated, prolonged, or delayed postoperative intraocular inflammation.

DESIGN

Perspective.

METHODS

Selected articles on normal and abnormal postoperative intraocular inflammation were reviewed and interpreted in the context of the authors' clinical and research experience.

RESULTS

In addition to infectious endophthalmitis, a number of noninfectious conditions characterized by exaggerated, prolonged, or delayed postoperative inflammation have been described. Heuristically, increased postsurgical inflammation may be categorized by time from surgery to first recognition using the following general guidelines: as immediate and occurring within 2 days after surgery; as early and occurring after 2 days, but within the first 2 weeks, after surgery; and as delayed and occurring more than 2 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although infectious endophthalmitis always must be excluded as a cause of increased postoperative intraocular inflammation, potential noninfectious causes also exist. We review both infectious and noninfectious causes of increased postoperative inflammation and provide a diagnostic framework for evaluating such patients.