Optic Neuritis and Cranial Neuropathies Diagnosis Rates before Coronavirus Disease 2019, in the Initial Pandemic Phase, and Post-Vaccine Introduction

Demographic and Metabolic Risk Factors Associated with Development of Diabetic Macular Edema among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus

Purpose

Diabetic macular edema (DME), a leading cause of visual impairment, can occur regardless of diabetic retinopathy (DR) stage. Poor metabolic control is hypothesized to contribute to DME development, although large-scale studies have yet to identify such an association. This study aims to determine whether measurable markers of dysmetabolism are associated with DME development in persons with diabetes.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Participants

Using data from the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) repository, patients with diabetes mellitus and no preexisting DME were identified and followed over time to see what factors associated with DME development.

Methods

Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to assess the relationship between demographic variables, diabetes type, smoking history, baseline DR status, blood pressure (BP), lipid profile, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), and new onset of DME.

Main Outcome Measures

Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of developing DME with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Of 47 509 eligible patients from 10 SOURCE sites (mean age 63 ± 12 years, 58% female sex, 48% White race), 3633 (7.6%) developed DME in the study period. The mean ± standard deviation time to DME was 875 ± 684 days (∼2.4 years) with those with baseline nonproliferative DR (HR 3.67, 95% CI: 3.41-3.95) and proliferative DR (HR 5.19, 95% CI: 4.61-5.85) more likely to develop DME. There was no difference in DME risk between type 1 and type 2 patients; however, Black race was associated with a 40% increase in DME risk (HR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.30-1.51). Every 1 unit increase in HbA1C had a 15% increased risk of DME (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.13-1.17), and each 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP was associated with a 6% increased DME risk (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09). No association was identified between DME development and BMI, triglyceride levels, or high-density lipoprotein levels.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that in patients with diabetes modifiable risk factors such as elevated HbA1C and BP confer a higher risk of DME development; however, other modifiable systemic markers of dysmetabolism such as obesity and dyslipidemia did not. Further work is needed to identify the underlying contributions of race in DME.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Race, Social Determinants of Health, and the Quality of Diabetic Eye Care

Importance

Besides race, little is known about how other social determinants of health (SDOH) affect quality of diabetic eye care.

Objective

To evaluate the association between multiple SDOH and monitoring for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in accordance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was conducted in 11 US medical centers and included adult patients (18-75 years old) with diabetes. Patients received care from 2012 to 2023 and had 18 months or more of follow-up.

Exposures

Multiple SDOH and associated factors, including ethnicity, urbanicity of residence, health insurance type, and diabetes type.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of receiving 1 or more eye-care visits and 1 or more dilated fundus examinations in accordance with CPGs.

Results

The study cohort included 37 397 adults with diabetes: 10 157 Black patients and 27 240 White patients. The mean (SD) age was 58 (11) years for Black patients and 59 (11) years for White patients. Of the Black patients, 6422 (63.2%) were female and 3735 (36.8%) male; of the White patients, 13 120 (48.1) were female and 14 120 (51.8) were male. Compared with those of the same race in urban communities, Black patients (aOR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.31) and White patients (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91) with diabetes living in rural communities had 88% and 25% lower odds of having eye-care visits, respectively. Sicker Black and White patients, defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index, had 4% (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06) and 5% (aOR, 1.05, CI 1.04-1.06) higher odds of having an eye-care visit, respectively. Black patients with preexisting DR had 15% lower odds of visits (aOR, 0.85, CI 0.73-0.99) compared with those without preexisting DR while White patients with preexisting DR had 16% higher odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28). White patients with Medicare (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and Medicaid (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) had lower odds of eye-care visits vs patients with commercial health insurance. Hispanic White patients had 15% lower odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98) vs non-Hispanic White patients. White patients with type 1 diabetes had 17% lower odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) vs those with type 2 diabetes. Among patients who had eye-care visits, those with preexisting DR (Black: aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11-2.53; White: aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96) were more likely to undergo dilated fundus examinations.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that certain SDOH affected monitoring for DR similarly for Black and White patients with diabetes while others affected them differently. Patients living in rural communities, Black patients with preexisting DR, and Hispanic White patients were not receiving eye care in accordance with CPGs, which may contribute to worse outcomes.

Changes in the incidence of optic neuritis before and after COVID-19: A nationwide study 2017-2022

PURPOSE

To determine the risk of optic neuritis (ON) during non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), vaccination and infection phase of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in comparison to pre-outbreak levels in pediatric and adult populations in South Korea.

DESIGN

A nationwide, population-based, retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

South Korean individuals with a primary diagnosis of ON between January 2017 and December 2022.

METHODS

The Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database was queried for new diagnoses of ON between January 2017 and December 2022. Data were divided into 4 periods: pre-COVID-19 (2017-2019), NPI (2020), nationwide vaccination (2021) and nationwide infection (2022). The risk of ON development for each period was calculated and compared to pre-COVID-19 levels with 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence rate ratio (IRR) of ON for each period.

RESULTS

A total of 7,216 patients (52.7 % females) were included in the study, with 3,770 patients diagnosed with ON pre-COVID-19 (2017-2019), 1,193 patients during NPI, 1,135 patients during the vaccination and 1,118 patients during the infection phases. The annual incidence of ON during NPI (IRR 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-1.00), P=0.043), vaccination (IRR 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95), P=0.001) and infection (IRR 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.93), P<0.001) phases significantly decreased compared to pre-COVID-19 levels when adjusted for age and sex. The proportions of diagnosis with multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica (NMO), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) among patients who developed ON significantly increased in 2021 in comparison to the pre-outbreak levels (9.87% vs. 5.81%; P=0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The risks of ON development during NPI, vaccination and infection phases of COVID-19 did not increase in comparison to the pre-outbreak levels in general population. However, COVID-19 vaccination may be associated with increased risks of ON associated with diseases such as ADEM, MS and NMOSD.

Ocular manifestations of COVID-19

There is an increasing body of knowledge regarding how COVID-19 may be associated with ocular disease of varying severity and duration. This article discusses the literature on the ocular manifestations associated with COVID-19, including appraisal of the current evidence, suggested mechanisms of action, associated comorbidities and risk factors, timing from initial infection to diagnosis and clinical red flags. The current literature primarily comprises case reports and case series which inevitably lack control groups and evidence to support causality. However, these early data have prompted the development of larger population-based and laboratory studies that are emerging. As new data become available, a better appraisal of the true effects of COVID-19 on the eye will be possible. While the COVID-19 pandemic was officially declared no longer a "global health emergency" by the World Health Organization (WHO) in May 2023, case numbers continue to rise. Reinfection with different variants is predicted to lead to a growing cumulative burden of disease, particularly as more chronic, multi-organ sequelae become apparent with potentially significant ocular implications. COVID-19 ocular manifestations are postulated to be due to three main mechanisms: firstly, there is a dysregulated immune response to the initial infection linked to inflammatory eye disease; secondly, patients with COVID-19 have a greater tendency towards a hypercoagulable state, leading to prothrombotic events; thirdly, patients with severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation and are immunosuppressed due to administered corticosteroids or comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of secondary infections, including endophthalmitis and rhino-orbital-mucormycosis. Reported ophthalmic associations with COVID-19, therefore, include a range of conditions such as conjunctivitis, scleritis, uveitis, endogenous endophthalmitis, corneal graft rejection, retinal artery and vein occlusion, non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy, glaucoma, neurological and orbital sequelae. With the need to consider telemedicine consultation in view of COVID-19's infectivity, understanding the range of ocular conditions that may present during or following infection is essential to ensure patients are appropriately triaged, with prompt in-person ocular examination for management of potentially sight-threatening and life-threatening diseases.

Central nervous system manifestations following vaccination against COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has become the most effective countermeasure in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. However, vaccination is associated with side effects. This narrative review focuses on central nervous system (CNS) manifestations following COVID-19 vaccination and provides a summary of the potential underlying mechanisms and methods of diagnosis and management of the vaccination-related CNS manifestations. Headache, myalgia, optic neuritis, seizure, multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and encephalitis, delirium, acute transverse myelitis, and stroke have been reported after COVID-19 vaccination. Constant headache and myalgia are common manifestations that may necessitate further clinical investigation for stroke. To limit consequences, it is imperative to follow standard treatment protocols for each neurological disorder following COVID-19 vaccination. Immunosuppressive medication can be helpful in the treatment of seizures following vaccination since the immune response is involved in their etiology. Clinicians should be aware of the manifestations after COVID-19 vaccination to respond promptly and effectively. Clinical guidelines for the management of CNS manifestations following COVID-19 vaccination are in high demand and would be useful in each new SARS-CoV-2 variant pandemic.

A review of neuro-ophthalmic sequelae following COVID-19 infection and vaccination

Background

It has become increasingly clear that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can affect most organs in the human body, including the neurologic and ophthalmic systems. Vaccination campaigns have been developed at rapid pace around the world to protect the population from the fast-mutating virus. This review seeks to summarise current knowledge of the neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of both COVID-19 infection and vaccination.

Evidence acquisition

Electronic searches for published literature were conducted using EMBASE and MEDLINE on the 30th of July 2023. The search strategy comprised of controlled vocabulary and free-text synonyms for the following terms in various combinations: "coronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, 2019-nCoV, vaccination, vaccine, immunisation and neuro-ophthalmology". No time range limits were set for the literature search. Published English abstracts for articles written in a different language were screened if available.

Results

A total of 54 case reports and case series were selected for use in the final report. 34 articles documenting neuro-ophthalmic manifestations following COVID-19 infection and 20 articles with neuro-ophthalmic complications following COVID-19 vaccination were included, comprising of 79 patients in total. The most commonly occurring condition was optic neuritis, with 25 cases following COVID-19 infection and 27 cases following vaccination against COVID-19.

Conclusions

The various COVID-19 vaccines that are currently available are part of the global effort to protect the most vulnerable of the human population. The incidence of neuro-ophthalmic consequences following infection with COVID-19 is hundred-folds higher and associated with more harrowing systemic effects than vaccination against the virus.