Rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers: A Paradigm Shift in Treatment Approach

Checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated substantial efficacy in the treatment of numerous solid tumors, including head and neck cancer. Their inclusion in the therapeutic paradigm in metastatic lines of treatment has certainly improved the outcomes of these patients. Starting from this assumption, numerous studies have been conducted on ICIs in other earlier disease settings, including studies conducted in patients in neoadjuvant settings. However, how many and which studies are truly significant? Can they lay concrete foundations for further future studies and therefore allow us to continue to have this interesting future perspective? Through a review of the existing literature, coupled with insights gleaned from clinical practice and from the main recently published studies, we aim to examine the therapeutic potential of ICIs in patients affected by head and neck cancer in a neoadjuvant treatment setting and encourage researchers to set up successful future clinical trials.

Apatinib potentiates the therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1 in locally advanced head and neck cancers

OBJECTIVES

Antiangiogenic inhibitors have been shown to synergize with immune checkpoint blockade, but the underlying mechanisms of the synergistic response are not fully understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigate the impact of VEGFR2 inhibition on tumor-infiltrating immune cells in vivo and the activity of the combination of apatinib and anti-PD-1 in synergistic mouse model of HNSCC. A patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the left tongue with cervical lymph node were received with combined induction treatment of camrelizumab and apatinib to validate the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery.

RESULTS

We found that apatinib increased the infiltration of CD8+T cells and decreased the population of Tregs in a preclinical syngeneic mouse model. The proportions of CD8+PD1+T cells were significantly increased in apatinib-treated tumors. The combined treatment of apatinib and anti-PD-1 demonstrated better therapeutic benefit than each treatment alone. The patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the left tongue with cervical lymph node achieved major pathologic response (MPR) after two cycles of combined induction treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that apatinib therapy synergized with an anti-PD-1 antibody in preclinical cancer models and in patient with advanced HNSCC. These results provide a new rationale for advancing this neoadjuvant immunotherapy in large scale of clinical trials of HNSCC.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy shows major pathological response and low recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade (neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy) for patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted. Patients with initially diagnosed, resectable HNSCCs who received the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and radical surgery were included. Correlation analysis between patients' clinical characteristics and pathological responses, and survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included. The majority of patients (55, 69.6%) were diagnosed at locally advanced stages and most of them (58, 73.4%) had tumor located at the oral cavity. Nearly half of patients (35, 44.3%) received two cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and the rest had three or more cycles. The R0 resection rate was 98.7%. In the pathological evaluation, 53.1% of patients reached pathological complete responses or major pathological responses. After a median follow-up of 17.0 months, the 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.2% and 97.4%, respectively. The pathological response showed a significantly positive association with survival benefits (p < 0.001). Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer had the best pathological response and survival outcomes. Besides, history of radiation at head and neck region and poor pathological response were found to be independent risk factors of DFS for patients receiving such treatments.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy of HNSCC showed high rate of pathological response and low recurrence rate, holding promise for becoming the new standard of care for resectable HNSCC.

Revisiting the concept of neoadjuvant and induction therapy in head and neck cancer with the advent of immunotherapy

The treatment of locally advanced (LA) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is based on surgery followed by (chemo)radiation or on curative (chemo)radiation, depending on site and stage. Despite optimal locoregional treatment, about 50% of patients recur, with a huge impact on prognosis and substantial morbidity. The advent of immunotherapy (IT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) changed the paradigm of systemic treatment for recurrent/metastatic (RM) disease, showing activity, efficacy, and safety in both platinum-resistant and platinum-naïve patients. Such data led clinicians to design clinical trials to investigate early administration of IT even in the neoadjuvant or window of opportunity setting. In this review, we examine the published and ongoing trials investigating IT in the neoadjuvant setting for LA HNSCC. We address the current challenges of this treatment modality: optimal patient selection for neoadjuvant IT; choosing the appropriate systemic approach to enhance response without compromising tolerability; determining the ideal study endpoint, with a focus on major pathological response as a potential surrogate for overall survival; evaluating treatment response through imaging, considering the discordance between radiological and pathological assessments; and the influence of neoadjuvant IT response on locoregional treatment de-escalation strategies.

Window-of-opportunity clinical trials for biomarker discovery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the window-of-opportunity clinical trials that have been reported in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and discuss their challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

Limited treatment options exist in HNSCC. Cetuximab, an mAb targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, and the PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, are the only drugs that improved overall survival in the recurrent and/or metastatic setting. Both cetuximab and nivolumab improve overall survival by less than 3 months, potentially because of the lack of predictive biomarkers. The only validated predictive biomarker to date is protein ligand PD-L1 expression that predicts the efficacy of pembrolizumab in first-line, nonplatinum refractory recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. The identification of biomarkers of efficacy of new drugs is key to avoid administering toxic drugs to patients who will not benefit from them, and to expect increased drug efficacy in the biomarker-positive group of patients. One way of identifying such biomarkers are the window-of-opportunity trials in which drugs are given for a short period of time before the definitive treatment, with the aim to collect samples for translational research. These trials differ from neoadjuvant strategies where efficacy is the primary endpoint.

SUMMARY

We show that these trials were safe and successful in identifying biomarkers.

Synthetic biology-inspired cell engineering in diagnosis, treatment, and drug development

The fast-developing synthetic biology (SB) has provided many genetic tools to reprogram and engineer cells for improved performance, novel functions, and diverse applications. Such cell engineering resources can play a critical role in the research and development of novel therapeutics. However, there are certain limitations and challenges in applying genetically engineered cells in clinical practice. This literature review updates the recent advances in biomedical applications, including diagnosis, treatment, and drug development, of SB-inspired cell engineering. It describes technologies and relevant examples in a clinical and experimental setup that may significantly impact the biomedicine field. At last, this review concludes the results with future directions to optimize the performances of synthetic gene circuits to regulate the therapeutic activities of cell-based tools in specific diseases.

Reliability of gene-expression profiling from tumor biopsy for refining neoadjuvant strategies in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

While recent clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors showed promising results in a subset of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), there is a need for the identification of robust biomarkers in tumor biopsies to improve patient selection. This context suggests unravelling transcriptomic heterogeneity between untreated paired samples from same patient with HNSCC. Based on previous studies and the analysis of publicly available gene expression profiles of paired tumor biopsies and surgical resection specimens, we discuss the reliability of tumor biopsy to capture the overall activation of targetable biological pathways in patients with HNSCC. Further studies investigating intratumor transcriptomic heterogeneity as well as the effect of sampling methods on gene expression are needed in patients with HNSCC, in order to develop innovative and relevant biomarker-driven neoadjuvant strategies.

Programmed cell death protein 1 axis blockade in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches

Immunotherapy and in particular programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been applied not only in the management of recurrent or metastatic disease but also as component of potentially curative treatment for many solid tumors. The incorporation of immunotherapy as neoadjuvant and /or adjuvant therapy in the treatment paradigm of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is appealing with the goals of enhancing antitumor efficacy and, at the same time, reduce toxicity. This review analyzes the rationale for employing immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, reviews the results of relevant clinical trials, and examines the potential benefits and caveats of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant approaches in patients with SCCHN.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Strategies in HPV-Related Head-and-Neck Cancer

Purpose of review

Herein, we review current evidence and future directions of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) by describing published data and ongoing clinical trials.

Recent findings

Although HNSCCs have shown response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent/metastatic disease, a limited number of patients benefit from this treatment. There is an expanding interest in clarifying the clinical benefit of immunotherapy in earlier stage disease setting including at initial presentation. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for HPV-related HNSCCs represents a rational approach, as these cancers bear strong viral antigens.

Summary

The majority of patients with HPV-related HNSCC have good prognosis and treatment de-intensification strategies are under evaluation to decrease toxicity and maintain efficacy. On the other hand, a subset of patients with HPV-related HNSCC have a poorer prognosis and additional treatment options are need to improve outcome. Multiple clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy will achieve these goals.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Surgery for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in 30‒50% five-year overall survival. In IMCISION (NCT03003637), a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, 32 HNSCC patients are treated with 2 doses (in weeks 1 and 3) of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) using nivolumab (NIVO MONO, n = 6, phase Ib arm A) or nivolumab plus a single dose of ipilimumab (COMBO, n = 26, 6 in phase Ib arm B, and 20 in phase IIa) prior to surgery. Primary endpoints are feasibility to resect no later than week 6 (phase Ib) and primary tumor pathological response (phase IIa). Surgery is not delayed or suspended for any patient in phase Ib, meeting the primary endpoint. Grade 3‒4 immune-related adverse events are seen in 2 of 6 (33%) NIVO MONO and 10 of 26 (38%) total COMBO patients. Pathological response, defined as the %-change in primary tumor viable tumor cell percentage from baseline biopsy to on-treatment resection, is evaluable in 17/20 phase IIa patients and 29/32 total trial patients (6/6 NIVO MONO, 23/26 COMBO). We observe a major pathological response (MPR, 90‒100% response) in 35% of patients after COMBO ICB, both in phase IIa (6/17) and in the whole trial (8/23), meeting the phase IIa primary endpoint threshold of 10%. NIVO MONO’s MPR rate is 17% (1/6). None of the MPR patients develop recurrent HSNCC during 24.0 months median postsurgical follow-up. FDG-PET-based total lesion glycolysis identifies MPR patients prior to surgery. A baseline AID/APOBEC-associated mutational profile and an on-treatment decrease in hypoxia RNA signature are observed in MPR patients. Our data indicate that neoadjuvant COMBO ICB is feasible and encouragingly efficacious in HNSCC.

Immune checkpoint blockade has become standard care for patients with recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here the authors present the results of a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, reporting safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab prior to standard-of-care surgery in patients with HNSCC. .

Neoadjuvant presurgical PD-1 inhibition in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a prevalent surgically treated subset of head and neck cancer with frequent recurrence and poor survival. Immunotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. However, whether antitumor responses could be fostered by neoadjuvant presurgical immunotherapy remains unclear. Using a Simon's two-stage design, we present results of a single-arm phase-II trial where 12 patients with stage II-IVA OCSCC received 3 to 4 biweekly doses of 3 mg/kg nivolumab followed by definitive surgical resection with curative intent. Presurgical nivolumab therapy in this cohort shows an overall response rate of 33% (n = 4 patients; 95% CI: 12%-53%). With a median follow up of 2.23 years, 10 out of 12 treated patients remain alive. Neoadjuvant nivolumab is safe, well-tolerated, and is not associated with delays in definitive surgical treatment in this study. This work demonstrates feasibility and safety for incorporation of nivolumab in the neoadjuvant setting for OCSCC (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03021993).

Neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Resectable Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The emerging approach of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for solid cancers has set the ground for the integration of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors into the neoadjuvant setting of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment.

Objective

To assess the reported efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable HNSCC.

Data Sources and Study Selection

Electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for published and ongoing cohort studies and randomized clinical trials that evaluate neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable HNSCC. The search results generated studies from 2015 to July 2021.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two investigators (R.M. and L.K.) independently identified and extracted articles for potential inclusion. Random and fixed models were used to achieve pooled odds ratios. All results are presented with 95% CIs. Data quality was assessed by means of the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were reported efficacy, evaluated by major pathological response and pathological complete response in the primary tumors and lymph nodes separately, and safety, assessed by preoperative grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events and surgical delay rate.

Results

A total of 344 patients from 10 studies were included. In 8 studies, neoadjuvant immunotherapy only was administered, and the other 2 studies combined immunotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The overall major pathological response rate in the primary tumor sites from studies reporting on neoadjuvant immunotherapy only was 9.7% (95% CI, 3.1%-18.9%) and the pathological complete response rate was 2.9% (95% CI, 0%-9.5%). Preoperative grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were reported at a rate of 8.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-23.2%) and surgical delay at a rate of 0% (95% CI, 0%-0.9%). There was a favorable association of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with all outcome measures. The subgroup analyses did not find one specific anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent to be superior to another, and the favorable association was demonstrated by either immunotherapy alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for resectable HNSCC was well tolerated and may confer therapeutic advantages implied by histopathological response. Long-term outcomes are awaited.

Preoperative Immunotherapy in the Multidisciplinary Management of Oral Cavity Cancer

Despite advances in multimodal treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, recurrence rates remain high, providing an opportunity for new therapeutic modalities that may improve oncologic outcomes. Much recent attention has been paid to the molecular interactions between the tumor cells with the adjacent peritumoral microenvironment, in which immunosuppressive molecular changes create a landscape that promotes tumor progression. The rationale for the introduction of immunotherapy is to reverse the balance of these immune interactions in a way that utilizes the host immune system to attack tumor cells. In the preoperative setting, immunotherapy has the advantage of priming the unresected tumor and the associated native immune infiltration, supercharging the adaptive anti-tumor immune response. It also provides the basis for scientific discovery where the molecular profile of responders can be interrogated to elucidate prognostic markers to aid in future patient selection. Preoperative immunotherapy is not without limitations. The risk of surgical delay due to immune adverse events must be carefully discussed by members of a multidisciplinary treatment team and patient selection will be critical. One day, the discovery of predictive biomarkers may allow for algorithms where pre-surgical immunotherapy decreases the size of surgical defect and impacts the intensity of adjuvant therapy leading to improved patient survival and decreased morbidity. With further study, immunotherapy could become a key component of future treatment algorithm.

[Current immuno-oncology in head and neck cancer]

For many years surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy dominated the treatment in head and neck malignancies. Refinements of the particular techniques, either in surgery or in radiooncology, brought some progress. However, clinical outcome data are still not satisfying and side effects and long term toxicities are significant. Apart of the improvement of overall results, the reduction of side effects stays a main goal in this field. Targeted therapies as well as immune modulating therapies represent a new generation in the treatment of cancer. The development of new and highly effective substances makes rapid progress and immunotherapy has become a standard in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer. The following chapter will give you an actual review about the status quo of immunotherapy in head neck malignancies.

A platform for locoregional T-cell immunotherapy to control HNSCC recurrence following tumor resection

Surgical resection of head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with high rates of local and distant recurrence, partially mitigated by adjuvant therapy. A pre-existing immune response in the patient's tumor is associated with better outcomes following treatment with conventional therapies, but improved options are needed for patients with poor anti-tumor immunity. We hypothesized that local delivery of tumor antigen-specific T-cells into the resection cavity following surgery would direct T-cells to residual antigens in the margins and draining lymphatics and present a platform for T-cell-targeted immunotherapy. We loaded T-cells into a biomaterial that conformed to the resection cavity and demonstrated that it could release T-cells that retained their functional activity in-vitro, and in a HNSCC model in-vivo. Locally delivered T-cells loaded in a biomaterial were equivalent in control of established tumors to intravenous adoptive T-cell transfer, and resulted in the systemic circulation of tumor antigen-specific T-cells as well as local accumulation in the tumor. We demonstrate that adjuvant therapy with anti-PD1 following surgical resection was ineffective unless combined with local delivery of T-cells. These data demonstrate that local delivery of tumor-specific T-cells is an efficient option to convert tumors that are unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors to permit tumor cures.

Induction chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients.

Methods

A total of 163 patients were prospectively enrolled; 98 patients received IC only, and 65 patients received IC with sintilimab. Following neoadjuvant therapy, patients either underwent surgery (31.9%) or chemoradiotherapy (68.1%). Objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities between the two groups were compared.

Results

The ORR in the IC group was significantly lower than that in the IC with sintilimab group (68.4% vs 84.6%, P = 0.019). Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity occurred in 15 (15.3%) and 12 (18.5%) patients in the IC and IC with sintilimab groups, respectively. However, this difference was not significant (P = 0.596). After follow-up with a median time of 28.0 months, the IC group had a 2-year PFS rate of 27% (95%CI: 18–36%), whereas the IC with sintilimab group had a 2-year PFS rate of 44% (95%CI: 32–56%), and this difference was significant (P = 0.041). The 2-year OS rates in the IC and IC with sintilimab groups were 61% (95%CI: 52–70%) and 70% (95%CI: 60–80%), respectively, the difference was not significant (P = 0.681).

Conclusions

Addition of sintilimab to IC could provide longer PFS time than traditional chemotherapy regimen, without increasing the toxicity events.

[Immuno oncology treatment in head and neck cancer]

In the near future, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors will not only reach the relevant ENT clinics, but also the oncologically integrated ENT practice, since more and more patients under long-term therapy (currently up to 2 years) also have to be seen during clinical follow-up in the specialist practice. In this respect, we also consider as necessary that the basics of immuno-oncology in head and neck tumors are already taught as part of the ENT specialist training. In this review article, the background and the definitions of the therapy sections (first, second line treatment, marker, etc.) should be discussed in detail and the basic tools for understanding this new therapy option should be provided. Since 2017, we have been experiencing a high level of approval dynamics for checkpoint inhibitors in Germany, which is to be assessed as an expression of a new effective principle of action and, after surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, is establishing a fourth strong pillar in the multimodal spectrum against head and neck tumors. Right from the start, the checkpoint inhibitors in the first phase 1b, 2 and 2b studies achieved overall response rates of 16-22 % with overall survival rates of 6-8 months in seriously ill patients with HNSCC who already had a first- and/or even second-line therapy. Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab are currently approved in Germany for the first and second line therapy of relapsed/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region (HNSCC), Cemiplimab for recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and Avelumab for metastatic recurrent Merkel-cell carcinoma. The synopsis article about immune checkpoint inhibitors is intended to convey the basic understanding of the principle of action, the indication, toxicity management and the further development within trials in head and neck oncology.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable head and neck cancer: oral cavity carcinoma as a potential research model

Squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity (OCSCC) accounts for approximately 25% of cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Tobacco and alcohol consumption are the main risk factors for both cancers. Surgical resection, combined with adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy in patients with high risk of relapse, is the key element in management in the initial stages. However, despite the availability of aggressive multidisciplinary treatments, advanced resectable OCSCC carries poor prognosis; only half of the patients are disease-free 5 years after the surgery. Immunotherapy based on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been proven to be effective in a wide variety of tumours, including recurrent and metastatic HNSCC. These positive results resulted in investigations into its effectiveness in earlier stages of the disease with OCSCC emerging as an interesting research model because of the accessible location of the tumours. This article reviews the potential advantages of emerging immunotherapeutic agents [mainly monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors] as neoadjuvant treatment for OCSCC at locoregional stages as well as the ongoing clinical trials, challenges in evaluating tumour response, and possible predictive biomarkers of response with highlights regarding the role of oral microbiota as modulators of immune response. The efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 drugs in these patients have been proven in preliminary trials. If there is a decrease in the relapse rate and an improvement in the overall survival after surgical resection in ongoing trials, preoperative immunotherapy may be established as a treatment option for patients with early stages of the disease.

Personalized cancer vaccination in head and neck cancer

Cancer is characterized by an accumulation of somatic mutations that represent a source of neoantigens for targeting by antigen-specific T cells. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a relatively high mutation burden across all cancer types, and cellular immunity to neoantigens likely plays a key role in HNSCC clinical outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have brought new treatment options and hopes to patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. However, many patients do not benefit from CPI therapies, highlighting the need for novel immunotherapy or combinatorial strategies. One such approach is personalized cancer vaccination targeting tumor-associated antigens and tumor-specific antigens, either as single agents or in combination with other therapies. Recent advances in next-generation genomic sequencing technologies and computational algorithms have enabled efficient identification of somatic mutation-derived neoantigens and are anticipated to facilitate the development of cancer vaccine strategies. Here, we review cancer vaccine approaches against HNSCC, including fundamental mechanisms of a cancer vaccine, considerations for selecting appropriate antigens, and combination therapies.

The right Timing, right combination, right sequence, and right delivery for Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy (CI) represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) presents a new paradigm for cancer treatment. However, the types of cancer that attain a therapeutic benefit from ICIs are limited, and the efficacy of these treatments does not meet expectations. To date, research on ICIs has mainly focused on identifying biomarkers and patient characteristics that can enhance the therapeutic effect on tumors. However, studies on combinational strategies for CI are being actively conducted to overcome the resistance to ICI treatment. Moreover, it has been confirmed that dramatic anticancer effects are achieved through "neoadjuvant" immunotherapy with ICIs in treatment-naïve cancer patients; consequently, it has become necessary to consider how to best apply cancer immunotherapies for patients, even with respect to their tumor stages. In this review, we sought to discuss the right timing of ICI treatment in consideration of the progression of cancer with a changing tumor-immune microenvironment. Furthermore, we investigated which types of combinational treatments and their corresponding sequences of administration could optimize the therapeutic effect of ICIs to expand the applicable target of ICIs and increase their therapeutic efficacy. Finally, we discussed several delivery pathways and methods that can maximize the effect of ICIs.

Examining the relationship of immunotherapy and wound complications following flap reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy agents are used to treat advanced head and neck lesions. We aim to elucidate relationship between immunotherapy and surgical wound complications.

METHODS

Retrospective multi-institutional case series evaluating patients undergoing ablative and flap reconstructive surgery and immunotherapy treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME

wound complications.

RESULTS

Eight-two (62%) patients received preoperative therapy, 89 (67%) postoperative, and 33 (25%) in both settings. Forty-one (31%) patients had recipient site complications, 12 (9%) had donor site. Nineteen (14%) had major recipient site complications, 22 (17%) had minor. There was no statistically significant difference in complications based on patient or tumor-specific variables. Preoperative therapy alone demonstrated increased major complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, p = 0.04), and trend to more donor site complications (OR 7.4, p = 0.06), however treatment in both preoperative and postoperative therapy was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative immunotherapy may be associated with increased wound complications. Controlled studies are necessary to delineate this association and potential risks of therapy.

Synergies Radiotherapy-Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers. A New Concept for Radiotherapy Target Volumes-"Immunological Dose Painting"

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and definitive radiotherapy is investigated for the multimodal treatment of cisplatin non-eligible locally advanced head and neck cancers (HNC). In the case of recurrent and metastatic HNC, immunotherapy has shown benefit over the EXTREME protocol, being already considered the standard treatment. One of the biggest challenges of multimodal treatment is to establish the optimal therapy sequence so that the synergistic effect is maximal. Thus, superior results were obtained for the administration of anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy, but the anti-PD-L1 therapy demonstrates the maximum potential of radio-sensitization of the tumor in case of concurrent administration. The synergistic effect of radiotherapy–immunotherapy (RT–IT) has been demonstrated in clinical practice, with an overall response rate of about 18% for HNC. Given the demonstrated potential of radiotherapy to activate the immune system through already known mechanisms, it is necessary to identify biomarkers that direct the “nonresponders” of immunotherapy towards a synergistic RT–IT stimulation strategy. Stimulation of the immune system by irradiation can convert “nonresponder” to “responder”. With the development of modern techniques, re-irradiation is becoming an increasingly common option for patients who have previously been treated with higher doses of radiation. In this context, radiotherapy in combination with immunotherapy, both in the advanced local stage and in recurrent/metastatic of HNC radiotherapy, could evolve from the “first level” of knowledge (i.e., ballistic precision, dose conformity and homogeneity) to “level two” of “biological dose painting” (in which the concept of tumor heterogeneity and radio-resistance supports the need for doses escalation based on biological criteria), and finally to the “third level“ ofthe new concept of “immunological dose painting”. The peculiarity of this concept is that the radiotherapy target volumes and tumoricidal dose can be completely reevaluated, taking into account the immune-modulatory effect of irradiation. In this case, the tumor target volume can include even the tumor microenvironment or a partial volume of the primary tumor or metastasis, not all the gross and microscopic disease. Tumoricidal biologically equivalent dose (BED) may be completely different from the currently estimated values, radiotherapy treating the tumor in this case indirectly by boosting the immune response. Thus, the clinical target volume (CTV) can be replaced with a new immunological-clinical target volume (ICTV) for patients who benefit from the RT–IT association (Image 1).

Combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy in definitive treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: review of current clinical trials

Background Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) presents as locally advanced disease in a majority of patients and is prone to relapse despite aggressive treatment. Since immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown clinically significant efficacy in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC (R/M HNSCC), a plethora of trials are investigating their role in earlier stages of disease. At the same time, preclinical data showed the synergistic role of concurrently administered radiotherapy and ICIs (immunoradiotherapy) and explained several mechanisms behind it. Therefore, this approach is prospectively tested in a neoadjuvant, definitive, or adjuvant setting in non-R/M HNSCC patients. Due to the intricate relationship between host, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, each of these approaches has its advantages and disadvantages. In this narrative review we present the biological background of immunoradiotherapy, as well as a rationale for, and possible flaws of, each treatment approach, and provide readers with a critical summary of completed and ongoing trials. Conclusions While immunotherapy with ICIs has already become a standard part of treatment in patients with R/M HNSCC, its efficacy in a non-R/M HNSCC setting is still the subject of extensive clinical testing. Irradiation can overcome some of the cancer's immune evasive manoeuvres and can lead to a synergistic effect with ICIs, with possible additional benefits of concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of this combination is not robust and details in trial design and treatment delivery seem to be of unprecedented importance.

Phase III study of nivolumab alone or combined with ipilimumab as immunotherapy versus standard of care in resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) often requires postoperative chemoradiation with high risk of toxicity. Disease-free survival (DFS) after 2 years is approximately 70%. Combining nivolumab (N), a PD-1-inhibitor and ipilimumab (I), a CTLA4- inhibitor, may improve DFS due to antitumor effects of immunotherapy. The IMSTAR-HN study compares neoadjuvant N and N ± I 6 months after adjuvant therapy versus standard therapy as first-line treatment for LA-HNSCC. Eligible patients have treatment-naive LA-HNSCC, Eastern cooperative oncology group performance score (PS) ≤1 and no distant metastasis. 276 patients will be randomized into two arms. Primary endpoint is DFS and secondary endpoint includes locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). This study is one of the first in HNSCCs implementing immunotherapy in first-line treatment in a curative setting. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03700905 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

John MA. Time for a Paradigm Shift in Head and Neck Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused physicians and surgeons to consider restructuring traditional cancer management paradigms. We aim to review the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of head and neck cancer, with an emphasis on the role of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) during a pandemic.

DATA SOURCES

COVID-19 resources from PubMed, Google Scholar, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and the American Head and Neck Society were examined.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies and guidelines related to the multidisciplinary management of head and neck cancer in the COVID-19 setting were reviewed. A total of 54 studies were included. Given the continuously evolving body of literature, the sources cited include the latest statements from medical and dental societies.

RESULTS

The unpredictable fluctuation of hospital resources and the risk of the nosocomial spread of SARS-CoV-2 have direct effects on head and neck cancer management. Using an MDT approach to help define "essential surgery" for immediately life- or function-threatening disease processes in the context of available hospital resources will help to maximize outcomes. Early enrollment in an MDT is often critical for considering nonsurgical options to protect patients and health care workers. The role of the MDT continues after cancer treatment, if delivered, and the MDT plays an essential role in surveillance and survivorship programs in these challenging times.

CONCLUSION

Head and neck cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic poses a unique challenge for all specialists involved. Early MDT involvement is important to maximize patient outcomes and satisfaction in the context of public and community safety.

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes after neoadjuvant IRX-2 immunotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Interim findings from the INSPIRE trial

OBJECTIVES

IRX-2 is a primary-cell-derived immune-restorative consisting of multiple human cytokines that act to overcome tumor-mediated immunosuppression and provide an in vivo tumor vaccination to increase tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). A randomized phase II trial was conducted of the IRX regimen 3 weeks prior to surgery consisting of an initial dose of cyclophosphamide followed by 10 days of regional perilymphatic IRX-2 cytokine injections and daily oral indomethacin, zinc and omeprazole (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2).

METHODS

A total of 96 patients with previously untreated, stage II-IV oral cavity SCC were randomized 2:1 to experimental (1) or control (2) regimens (64:32). Paired biopsy and resection specimens from 62 patients were available for creation of tissue microarray (n = 39), and multiplex immunohistology (n = 54). Increases in CD8+ TIL infiltrate scores of at least 10 cells/mm² were used to characterize immune responders (IR).

RESULTS

Regimen 1 was associated with significant increases in CD8+ infiltrates (p = 0.01) compared to Regimen 2. In p16 negative cancers (n = 26), significant increases in CD8+ and overall TILs were evident in Regimen 1 (p = 0.004, and 0.04 respectively). IRs were more frequent in Regimen 1 (74% vs 31%, p = 0.01). Multiplex immunohistology for PD-L1 expression confirmed an increase in PD-L1 H score for Regimen 1 compared to Regimen 2 (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate significant increases in TILs after perilymphatic IRX-2 injections. Three quarters of patients showed significant immune responses to IRX-2. (NCT02609386).

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resectable Locally Advanced, Human Papillomavirus-Unrelated Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Pembrolizumab improved survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aims of this study were to determine if pembrolizumab would be safe, result in pathologic tumor response (pTR), and lower the relapse rate in patients with resectable human papillomavirus (HPV)-unrelated HNSCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered and followed 2 to 3 weeks later by surgical tumor ablation. Postoperative (chemo)radiation was planned. Patients with high-risk pathology (positive margins and/or extranodal extension) received adjuvant pembrolizumab. pTR was quantified as the proportion of the resection bed with tumor necrosis, keratinous debris, and giant cells/histiocytes: pTR-0 (<10%), pTR-1 (10%-49%), and pTR-2 (≥50%). Coprimary endpoints were pTR-2 among all patients and 1-year relapse rate in patients with high-risk pathology (historical: 35%). Correlations of baseline PD-L1 and T-cell infiltration with pTR were assessed. Tumor clonal dynamics were evaluated (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02296684).

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients enrolled. After neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, serious (grades 3-4) adverse events and unexpected surgical delays/complications did not occur. pTR-2 occurred in eight patients (22%), and pTR-1 in eight other patients (22%). One-year relapse rate among 18 patients with high-risk pathology was 16.7% (95% confidence interval, 3.6%-41.4%). pTR ≥10% correlated with baseline tumor PD-L1, immune infiltrate, and IFNγ activity. Matched samples showed upregulation of inhibitory checkpoints in patients with pTR-0 and confirmed clonal loss in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with locally advanced, HPV-unrelated HNSCC, pembrolizumab was safe, and any pathologic response was observed in 44% of patients with 0% pathologic complete responses. The 1-year relapse rate in patients with high-risk pathology was lower than historical.

Genomics and precision surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The identification of the biological determinants that shape the response of tumors to medical therapies offers perspectives for better patient stratification and therapeutic targeting. Here, we discuss how genomics could help to improve the surgical treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We examine the potential use of genomic analyses for: i) refining and standardizing the indications for surgery, ii) the choice of surgical procedure, and iii) the follow-up of patients with resected tumors. We highlight the studies that used genomics to explore the contribution of tumor biology to the outcome of surgery. We discuss the important developments that are challenging current surgical practice in HNSCC, such as neoadjuvant immunotherapy and the analysis of circulating DNA. Genomic analyses provide practical tools that could help improve the pathological diagnosis and staging of HNSCC, and increase the appreciation of the importance of tumor biology in the outcome of surgery. Identification of biomarkers will likely contribute to a move toward precision surgery of HNSCC, i.e. the personalization of surgical practice based on tumor biology.

Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte and Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratios as Prognostic Markers of Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Tumours-Results of a Retrospective Multicentric Study

BACKGROUND

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may be useful for drawing conclusions about the survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients.

METHODS

Clinical data of 156 patients managed for HNSCC at two head and neck surgery centres were analyzed retrospectively. We studied the relationships between survival and PLR as well as NLR.

RESULTS

With regards to 5-year survival, the difference between the two groups with PLR values lower or higher than the threshold was statistically significant (p = 0.004), and we found the same for disease-free survival (p = 0.05), and tumour-specific mortality (p = 0.009). Concerning NLR, the difference in tumour-specific survival was statistically significant (p = 0.006). According to the multivariate analysis, NLR values higher than the threshold indicated an enhanced risk for overall as well as for tumour-specific mortality.

CONCLUSION

In HNSCC patients, a high NLR may be considered as an independent risk factor for 5-year overall survival.

Immunotherapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Despite many advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatments, only modest improvements in survival, function, and quality of life have been achieved after treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. With a better understanding of the biology and genetics of tumours, the emergence of a paradigm shift towards the further development of non-surgical treatments may result in less morbidity and better outcomes than are seen currently. SCC of the head and neck is known to be a complex disease that has a sophisticated interaction with the human immune system. At the forefront of emerging treatments is immunotherapy, which has already been established in many other areas of oncology. The rapidly evolving nature of immunotherapeutic agents and, sometimes, their complex mechanisms can make the understanding of these concepts challenging, and could discourage clinicians from engaging in clinical trials. The aim of this paper therefore was to review the current premise for immunotherapeutic approaches, and to provide a contemporary evidence-based rationale for their use.

Window of opportunity trials in head and neck cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a large global burden of disease and poor survival outcomes. Recent targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been explored in HNSCC, but there has been limited translation to clinical practice outside of recurrent or metastatic cases. Window of opportunity settings, where novel agents are administered between cancer diagnosis and planned definitive therapy, have begun to be employed in HNSCC. Tumor tissue biopsies are obtained at diagnosis and after the investigation treatment, along with other biospecimens and radiographic exams. Thus, this study design can characterize the safety profiles, pharmacodynamics, and initial tumor responses to novel therapies in a treatment-naïve subject. Early window studies have also identified potential biomarkers to predict sensitivity or resistance to treatments. However, these early investigations have revealed multiple challenges associated with this trial design. In this review, we discuss recent window of opportunity trials in HNSCC and how they inform design considerations for future studies.

Effect of Immunotherapy on Local Treatment of Genitourinary Malignancies

CONTEXT

Management of metastatic genitourinary malignancies has recently been transformed through the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The best way to integrate them into local treatment paradigms is still under investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate evidence regarding the use of immunotherapy in the treatment of local disease, in both the perioperative and the metastatic setting.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a critical review of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Prospective and retrospective studies between 2011 and 2018 were included. Twenty-four publications were selected for inclusion, including 10 on urothelial carcinoma, seven on renal cell carcinoma, six on prostate cancer, and one on germ-cell cancer.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Prospective early-phase trials investigating neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to cystectomy in urothelial carcinoma suggest a high rate of pathological complete response, from 29% with atezolizumab to 39.5% with pembrolizumab. Several neoadjuvant and adjuvant trials are still ongoing in bladder, renal, and prostate cancers, before or after surgery. The combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy is being explored and could offer an interesting strategy for definitive treatment modality with curative intent. Finally, in metastatic disease, delayed local treatment could be discussed after immunotherapy in selected patients with an excellent radiographic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Little evidence exists on the oncological impact of immunotherapy on the local treatment of genitourinary malignancies, but preliminary results are encouraging and many prospective trials are ongoing.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we review recent advances in immunotherapy and its role in local treatment. Immunotherapy is evaluated before or after surgery, or in combination with radiotherapy for localized disease. Ongoing trials will bring clarity on the local downstaging effect of immunotherapy and its association with oncological and functional outcomes.

The evolving role of immuno-oncology for the treatment of head and neck cancer

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target immune co‐signaling pathways have the potential to enable immune mediated tumor eradication. While early adoption of these agents for the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has produced some astounding clinical successes, the majority of patients fail to respond to therapy. The purpose of this review is to first provide a broad overview of the immuno‐oncology (I‐O) landscape and to then focus on the current status of mAb‐based I‐O (mAb:I‐O) for the treatment of SCCHN, with particular attention to the development of strategies for improving treatment responses.

High Density of Intratumor CD45RO+ Memory Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Predicts Favorable Prognosis in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Although tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been increasingly appreciated as novel biomarkers for prognostic prediction in cancer, little attention has been paid to the CD45RO⁺ memory TIL and its associations with clinical outcomes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The purpose of this study was to determine the associations between CD45RO⁺ TILs and clinicopathologic parameters and prognosis in OSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue sections of primary OSCC from 2 independent tertiary referral cancer centers (Nanjing and Wuxi, China) were retrospectively collected and subjected to immunohistochemical staining for CD45RO. Densities of CD45RO⁺ TILs in the tumor center (CT) and invasive margin were calculated. Optimal cutoff values of CD45RO⁺ TILs for patient stratification were generated by X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess associations between CD45RO⁺ TILs and overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Prognostic prediction of CD45RO⁺ TILs was estimated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine eligible patients with OSCC were included. No relevant associations between CD45RO⁺ TILs and clinicopathologic parameters were identified. Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated that a high density of CD45RO TILs in the CT was significantly associated with favorable overall and recurrence-free survival (P = .0018 and .0007 by log-rank test). Cox proportional regression analyses showed that presence of CD45RO TILs in the CT was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival of OSCC. ROC curves showed that presence of CD45RO TILs in the CT was comparable to clinical stage in predicting patient survival, whereas their combination was superior to either parameter alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings indicate that intratumor density of CD45RO TILs is a viable and independent prognostic predictor for OSCC.

DNA methylation derived systemic inflammation indices are associated with head and neck cancer development and survival

OBJECTIVES

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is often associated with chronic systemic inflammation (SI). In the present study, we assessed if DNA methylation-derived SI (mdSI) indices: Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (mdNLR) and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte ratio (mdLMR) are associated with the presence of HNSCC and overall survival (OS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used two peripheral blood DNA methylation datasets: an HNSCC case-control dataset (n = 183) and an HNSCC survival dataset (n = 407) to estimate mdSI indices. We then performed multivariate regressions to test the association between mdSI indices, HNSCC development and OS.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression revealed that elevated mdNLR was associated with increased odds of being an HNSCC case (OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.14-5.34, P = 4 × 10-7) while the converse was observed for mdLMR (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.90, P = 2 × 10-3). In the HNSCC survival dataset, HPV16-E6 seropositive HNSCC cases had an elevated mdLMR (P = 9 × 10-5) and a lower mdNLR (P = 0.003) compared to seronegative patients. Multivariate Cox regression in the HNSCC survival dataset revealed that lower mdLMR (HR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.30-2.95, P = 0.0013) but not lower mdNLR (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46-1.00, P = 0.0501) was associated with increased risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that mdSI estimated by DNA methylation data is associated with the presence of HNSCC and overall survival. The mdSI indices may be used as a valuable research tool to reliably estimate SI in the absence of cell-based estimates. Rigorous validation of our findings in large prospective studies is warranted in the future.