Shiroff JJ, Nemeth LS. Public Perceptions of Recessive Carrier Testing in the Preconception and Prenatal Periods.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2015;
44:717-25. [PMID:
26469803 DOI:
10.1111/1552-6909.12764]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To explore public perceptions of preconception and prenatal recessive carrier testing.
DESIGN
Qualitative, descriptive.
SETTING
Chat rooms located in four websites targeted to those who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy.
PARTICIPANTS
Anonymous comments (N = 1925) in online chat rooms.
METHODS
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Analytic validity, Clinical validity, Clinical utility, Ethical, legal, social implications Model Process (ACCE) for evaluating a genetic test guided this deductive-inductive content analysis.
RESULTS
Participant perceptions of the clinical utility of recessive carrier screening with universal carrier panels are multidimensional. Data analysis revealed four a priori deductive themes present in the data. Secondary inductive analysis produced 20 themes, which exceeded the scope of the CDC's ACCE Model Process for assessing the clinical utility of a genetic test.
CONCLUSION
Participant perceptions of carrier testing are important to consider in the clinical utility of carrier testing. Participant perceptions of clinical utility vary from those of the CDC's ACCE Model Process and should be considered in evaluation of the clinical utility of recessive carrier testing in the preconception and prenatal populations.
Collapse