1
|
Mazzoleni B, Ferrari G, Savioni F, Gravante F, Lopane D, Dacomi A, Coldani C, Tomaiuolo G, Cattani D, Anastasi G, Mancin S. Non-pharmacological strategies to alleviate dysgeusia in patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2024; 70:102569. [PMID: 38593535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dysgeusia is a common side effect in oncology patients, significantly impacting their quality of life. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological strategies in treating dysgeusia in patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy. METHODS Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across five databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and the British Nursing Database. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools to assess the quality of the included studies. A harvest plot was used to synthesise evidence about the differential effects of population-level interventions. RESULTS Nine studies of non-pharmacological strategies to manage dysgeusia were included. These studies encompassed a variety of interventions, including oral applications and supplements, instrumental techniques, and educational programs. The review identified promising interventions such as cryotherapy and Miraculine supplementation, which showed potential in mitigating taste alterations. Instrumental techniques like photobiomodulation therapy and complementary and integrative medicine approaches, including acupuncture and herbs, were also found to be beneficial. Educational and self-management strategies emerged as effective interventions for empowering patients to manage dysgeusia. Despite the diversity of interventions and the limitations of the included studies, such as small sample sizes and geographical differences, these findings underscore the potential of non-pharmacological strategies in managing dysgeusia. CONCLUSION The results support the integration of these strategies into clinical practice, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to improve patient care. Further research should prioritize rigorous studies to enhance evidence and explore long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Mazzoleni
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Ferrari
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Gravante
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit, Local Health Autority of Caserta, Caserta, Italy
| | - Diego Lopane
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Dacomi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Coldani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Tomaiuolo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Cattani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuliano Anastasi
- Department of Trauma, AOU G. Martino University Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancin
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chow PI, Cohn WF, Finan PH, Eton DT, Anderson RT. Investigating psychological mechanisms linking pain severity to depression symptoms in women cancer survivors at a cancer center with a rural catchment area. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:193. [PMID: 38409388 PMCID: PMC10896770 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08391-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women cancer survivors, especially those in rural areas, with high levels of depression may be acutely susceptible to pain due to the ways they think, feel, and behave. The current study seeks to elucidate the relationship between symptoms of depression and pain severity in women cancer survivors, by examining the putative mediators involved in this relationship, specifically their self-efficacy for managing their health, how overwhelmed they were from life's responsibilities, and relational burden. METHODS Self-report data were collected from 183 cancer survivors of breast, cervical, ovarian, or endometrial/uterine cancer, who were between 6 months and 3 years post-active therapy. RESULTS Women cancer survivors with higher (vs. lower) symptoms of depression had more severe pain. Individual mediation analyses revealed that survivors with higher levels of depression felt more overwhelmed by life's responsibilities and had lower self-efficacy about managing their health, which was associated with greater pain severity. When all mediators were simultaneously entered into the same model, feeling overwhelmed by life's responsibilities significantly mediated the link between survivors' symptoms of depression and their pain severity. CONCLUSIONS The relationship between symptoms of depression and pain severity in women cancer survivors may be attributed in part to their self-efficacy and feeling overwhelmed by life's responsibilities. Early and frequent assessment of psychosocial factors involved in pain severity for women cancer survivors may be important for managing their pain throughout the phases of cancer survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip I Chow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
- University of Virginia NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | - Wendy F Cohn
- University of Virginia NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Patrick H Finan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - David T Eton
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Roger T Anderson
- University of Virginia NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Haenen V, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Bernar K, Morlion B, Moloney N, Fieuws S, De Groef A, Meeus M. Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education on somatosensory functioning after surgery for breast cancer: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2024; 307:248-272. [PMID: 36594663 DOI: 10.1002/ar.25127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Pain is one of the most prevalent and long-term adverse effects described by people who have undergone breast cancer surgery. Non-helpful perceptions and thoughts about pain may contribute to the transition of acute to persistent pain. Adding educational interventions to the current physical therapy program in this population may help to improve or prevent persistent pain. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a type of educational intervention that addresses the experience of pain in a broader sense by explaining pain not only from a biomedical perspective, but also from a psychological and social perspective. A double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial) investigated whether PNE, in addition to a standard physiotherapy program immediately after surgery for breast cancer, was more effective on somatosensory functioning in the short (4 months postoperatively) and long term (18 months postoperatively), than providing a biomedical explanation for pain. Somatosensory functioning was evaluated using a self-reported questionnaire as well as a comprehensive quantitative sensory testing evaluation. The findings of this study revealed that adding six sessions of PNE to a standard physical therapy program (n = 184) did not result in a significantly different course of somatosensory functioning up to 18 months postoperatively as compared to biomedical pain education. These findings provide an interesting basis for future research into who should receive PNE after surgery for breast cancer (e.g., patient profiling or phenotyping) and how we can tailor it to the individual to increase its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Dams
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elien Van der Gucht
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haenen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Lymphedema, UZ Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KUL Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Bernar
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Morlion
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Section Anaesthesiology and Algology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Steffen Fieuws
- Interuniversity Center for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, University of Leuven and University of Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An De Groef
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Pain In Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Munter J, Dodlek N, Khmaladze A, Parreira ST, Ullgren H, de Man R, de Jong FA, Oldenmenger WH. The role of cancer nurses in cancer-related pain management in Europe. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2023; 17:26323524231216996. [PMID: 38106339 PMCID: PMC10725126 DOI: 10.1177/26323524231216996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer pain is a common symptom in patients with cancer and can largely affect their quality of life. Pain management is important to minimize the impact of pain on daily activities. Cancer nurses are significantly involved in all steps of pain management and contribute to the success of therapy through their knowledge and expertise. While they generally play an important role in the screening, assessment, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients and their (pain) symptoms, this varies from country to country in Europe. An important aspect is their role in educating patients and their families about what pain is, what impact it can have, how it can be treated pharmacologically or non-pharmacologically and what effects or problems can occur during treatment. While there is a great discrepancy between education and training opportunities for cancer nurses in different European countries, there is a continued need for education and training in pain management. Cancer is increasingly becoming a chronic disease, and the management of pain in cancer survivors will be crucial to maintain an adequate quality of life. With this, the crucial role of cancer nurses is becoming even more important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Helena Ullgren
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, ME Head & Neck, Lung & Skin Cancer, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rik de Man
- Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals B.V., Leusden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wendy H. Oldenmenger
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abahussin AA, West RM, Wong DC, Ziegler LE, Allsop MJ. Supporting Pain Self-Management in Patients With Cancer: App Development Based on a Theoretical and Evidence-Driven Approach. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e49471. [PMID: 37812491 PMCID: PMC10594136 DOI: 10.2196/49471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To inform the development of an intervention, it is essential to have a well-developed theoretical understanding of how an intervention causes change, as stated in the UK Medical Research Council guidelines for developing complex interventions. Theoretical foundations are often ignored in the development of mobile health apps intended to support pain self-management for patients with cancer. OBJECTIVE This study aims to systematically set a theory- and evidence-driven design for a pain self-management app and specify the app's active features. METHODS The Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework, a step-by-step theoretical approach to the development of interventions, was adopted to achieve the aim of this study. This started by understanding and identifying sources of behavior that could be targeted to support better pain management. Ultimately, the application of the BCW framework guided the identification of the active contents of the app, which were characterized using the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy version 1. RESULTS The theoretical analysis revealed that patients may have deficits in their capability, opportunity, and motivation that prevent them from performing pain self-management. The app needs to use education, persuasion, training, and enablement intervention functions because, based on the analysis, they were found the most likely to address the specified factors. Eighteen behavior change techniques were selected to describe precisely how the intervention functions can be presented to induce the desired change regarding the intervention context. In other words, they were selected to form the active contents of the app, potentially reducing barriers and serving to support patients in the self-management of pain while using the app. CONCLUSIONS This study fully reports the design and development of a pain self-management app underpinned by theory and evidence and intended for patients with cancer. It provides a model example of the BCW framework application for health app development. The work presented in this study is the first systematic theory- and evidence-driven design for a pain app for patients with cancer. This systematic approach can support clarity in evaluating the intervention's underlying mechanisms and support future replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma A Abahussin
- Department of Biomedical Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Robert M West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - David C Wong
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy E Ziegler
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J Allsop
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spiegel BMR, Fuller G, Liu X, Dupuy T, Norris T, Bolus R, Gale R, Danovitch I, Eberlein S, Jusufagic A, Nuckols T, Cowan P. Cluster-Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Physician-Directed Clinical Decision Support Versus Patient-Directed Education to Promote Appropriate Use of Opioids for Chronic Pain. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:1745-1758. [PMID: 37330159 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
We compared the effectiveness of physician-directed clinical decision support (CDS) administered via electronic health record versus patient-directed education to promote the appropriate use of opioids by conducting a cluster-randomized trial involving 82 primary care physicians and 951 of their patients with chronic pain. Primary outcomes were satisfaction with patient-physician communication consumer assessment of health care providers and system clinician and group survey (CG-CAHPS) and pain interference patient-reported outcomes measurement information system. Secondary outcomes included physical function (patient-reported outcomes measurement information system), depression (PHQ-9), high-risk opioid prescribing (>90 morphine milligram equivalents per day [≥90 mg morphine equivalent/day]), and co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. We used multi-level regression to compare longitudinal difference-in-difference scores between arms. The odds of achieving the maximum CG-CAHPS score were 2.65 times higher in the patient education versus the CDS arm (P = .044; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-6.80). However, baseline CG-CAHPS scores were dissimilar between arms, making these results challenging to interpret definitively. No difference in pain interference was found between groups (Coef = -0.64, 95% CI -2.66 to 1.38). The patient education arm experienced higher odds of Rx ≥ 90 milligrams morphine equivalent/day (odds ratio = 1.63; P = .010; 95% CI 1.13, 2.36). There were no differences between groups in physical function, depression, or co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. These results suggest that patient-directed education may have the potential to improve satisfaction with patient-physician communication, whereas physician-directed CDS via electronic health records may have greater potential to reduce high-risk opioid dosing. More evidence is needed to ascertain the relative cost-effectiveness between strategies. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the results of a comparative-effectiveness study of 2 broadly used communication strategies to catalyze dialog between patients and primary care physicians around chronic pain. The results add to the decision-making literature and offer insights about the relative benefits of physician-directed versus patient-directed interventions to promote the appropriate use of opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennan M R Spiegel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Garth Fuller
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California
| | - Xiaoyu Liu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California
| | - Taylor Dupuy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tom Norris
- American Chronic Pain Association, Rocklin, California
| | - Roger Bolus
- Research Solutions Group, Encinitas, California
| | - Rebecca Gale
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California
| | - Itai Danovitch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sam Eberlein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alma Jusufagic
- Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Teryl Nuckols
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California
| | - Penney Cowan
- American Chronic Pain Association, Rocklin, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang J, Chan DNS, Liu X, Cai Y, Chen J, Xie M. Effects of self-management interventions for cancer patients with pain: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:5652-5667. [PMID: 36929168 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the effects of self-management interventions targeting individuals with cancer-related pain on pain intensity, self-efficacy, quality of life (QoL), pain medication adherence, and pain-related knowledge and provide recommendations for the content and format of self-management interventions based on the existing evidence. DESIGN A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES A search of six electronic databases, including Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and Scopus. REVIEW METHODS This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published from January 2011 to March 2022 in English were retrieved. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess quality. Data were summarised using narrative synthesis. RESULTS This systematic review included six RCTs involving 748 patients with cancer-related pain. The results support the effectiveness of the intervention on QoL and pain-related knowledge. Mixed results were observed in the effectiveness on pain intensity, self-efficacy and medication adherence. Overall, the quality of the evidence was low. The content of self-management interventions varied across studies but with similar formats (face-to-face coaching and telephone follow-up). CONCLUSION The existing evidence supports the effectiveness of self-management interventions on pain-related knowledge and QoL. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to determine the most effective interventions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Self-management is recommended to improve cancer patients' pain awareness, self-management behaviour and adaptability. Components for self-management of cancer pain, including patient attitude and knowledge assessment, nurse coaching and counselling, reinforcement during follow-up period, and provision of supplementary materials on pain management and medication adherence, could be covered in the intervention. In the future, it is worthwhile exploring an effective intervention using Internet-based information technology, for example WeChat, to aid the delivery of self-management intervention. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This systematic review does not necessarily involve patients or public members in this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junfeng Zhang
- Department of Nursing, SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan, People's Republic of China
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Dorothy N S Chan
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Xingling Liu
- Department of Nursing, SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yingying Cai
- Department of Nursing, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiawen Chen
- Department of Nursing, SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan, People's Republic of China
| | - Minjuan Xie
- School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
González-Martín AM, Aguilera-García I, Castellote-Caballero Y, Rivas-Campo Y, Bernal-Suárez A, Aibar-Almazán A. Effectiveness of Therapeutic Education in Patients with Cancer Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4123. [PMID: 37627151 PMCID: PMC10452673 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Objective: To review the existing evidence on pain education in patients with pain derived from an oncological process. (2) Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the databases Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, and Scopus. The selected studies had to incorporate instruction about the neurophysiology of pain into their educational program. The target population was cancer patients who had suffered pain for at least one month. The methodological quality of the articles collected was assessed using the PEDro scale. (3) Results: Some 698 studies were initially identified, of which 12 were included in this review. Four different models of pain education programs were found in the studies' interventions. Pain intensity, pain experience, quality of life, pain tolerance, and catastrophism were the variables that appeared most frequently. (4) Conclusions: This review demonstrates that pain education in patients with cancer pain may produce effects such as decreased pain intensity and catastrophism. Knowledge about pain also seems to increase. However, no benefit was reported for patients' overall quality of life. Therefore, more research is needed to clarify the effects of these interventions on the oncology population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana María González-Martín
- Department of Education and Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Atlántico Medio, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
- Department of Psychology, Higher Education Center for Teaching and Educational Research, Plaza de San Martín 4, 28013 Madrid, Spain
| | - Iván Aguilera-García
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
| | | | - Yulieth Rivas-Campo
- Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of San Buenaventura-Cali, Santiago de Cali 760016, Colombia
| | - Antonio Bernal-Suárez
- Department of Education and Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Atlántico Medio, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Agustín Aibar-Almazán
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Bernar K, Morlion B, Godderis L, Haenen V, De Vrieze T, Fieuws S, Moloney N, Van Wilgen P, Meeus M, De Groef A. Effect of pain neuroscience education after breast cancer surgery on pain, physical, and emotional functioning: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial). Pain 2023; 164:1489-1501. [PMID: 36637138 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pain is one of the most common and long-lasting side effects reported by women surgically treated for breast cancer. Educational interventions may optimize the current physical therapy modalities for pain prevention or relief in this population. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is an educational intervention that explains the pain experience not only from a biomedical perspective but also the psychological and social factors that contribute to it. Through a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial) it was investigated if PNE, in addition to the standard physiotherapy program immediately after breast cancer surgery, was more effective over the course of 18 months postoperatively than providing a biomedical explanation for pain. Primary outcome was the change in pain-related disability (Pain Disability Index, 0-70) over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included change in pain intensity, upper limb function, physical activity level, and emotional functioning over 4, 6, 8, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Multivariate linear models for repeated (longitudinal) measures were used to compare changes. Preoperative and postoperative moderators of the change in pain-related disability were also explored. Of 184 participants randomized, the mean (SD) age in the PNE and biomedical education group was 55.4 (11.5) and 55.2 (11.4) years, respectively. The change in pain-related disability from baseline to 12 months postoperatively did not differ between the 2 groups (PNE 4.22 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-7.03], biomedical 5.53 [95% CI: 2.74-8.32], difference in change -1.31 [95% CI: -5.28 to 2.65], P = 0.516). Similar results were observed for all secondary outcomes. Future research should explore whether a more patient-tailored intervention would yield better results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Dams
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elien Van der Gucht
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Lymphedema, UZ Leuven-University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Bernar
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Morlion
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Section Anaesthesiology and Algology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lode Godderis
- Centre for Environment and Health, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- IDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haenen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tessa De Vrieze
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steffen Fieuws
- Interuniversity Center for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, University of Leuven and University of Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Paul Van Wilgen
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Transcare, Transdisciplinary Pain Management Centre, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mira Meeus
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - An De Groef
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Makhlouf SM, Ahmed S, Bennett MI. Libyan Healthcare Professionals', Patients' and Caregivers' Perceptions and Religious Beliefs about Cancer Pain and its Management: A Descriptive Qualitative Study. JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND HEALTH 2023; 62:1897-1919. [PMID: 36810722 PMCID: PMC10133376 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-023-01763-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Cancer pain remains a significant problem worldwide. It is often undertreated and presents in about half of cancer patients. Although several guidelines and pharmacological interventions for cancer pain management (CPM) exist, inadequate assessment and undertreatment of cancer pain are well-documented globally, especially in developing countries, including Libya. Perceptions, cultural and religious beliefs of healthcare professionals (HCP), patients, and caregivers about cancer pain and opioids are reported as barriers to CPM globally. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore Libyan HCPs', patients', and caregivers' views and religious beliefs about CPM and involved semi-structured interviews with 36 participants: 18 Libyan cancer patients, 6 caregivers, and 12 Libyan HCPs. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Patients, caregivers, and newly qualified HCPs were concerned about poor tolerance and drug addiction. HCPs perceived a lack of policies and guidelines, pain rating scales, and professional education and training as CPM barriers. Some patients were unable to pay for medicines if they faced financial difficulties. Instead, patients and caregivers emphasised religious and cultural beliefs for managing cancer pain, including the use of the Qur'an and cautery. Our results suggest that religious and cultural beliefs, lack of knowledge and training in CPM among HCPs, and economic and Libyan healthcare system-related factors negatively affect CPM in Libya.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim M Makhlouf
- School of Medicine, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, LIHS, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
| | - Shenaz Ahmed
- School of Medicine, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, LIHS, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Michael I Bennett
- School of Medicine, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, LIHS, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
De Groef A, Evenepoel M, Van Dijck S, Dams L, Haenen V, Wiles L, Catley M, Vogelzang A, Olver I, Hibbert P, Morlion B, Moseley GL, Heathcote LC, Meeus M. Feasibility and pilot testing of a personalized eHealth intervention for pain science education and self-management for breast cancer survivors with persistent pain: a mixed-method study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:119. [PMID: 36645526 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07557-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Here, we describe the development and pilot study of a personalized eHealth intervention containing a pain science education program and self-management support strategies regarding pain and pain-related functioning in female survivors of breast cancer. First, we aimed to evaluate the eHealth intervention's acceptability, comprehensibility, and satisfaction; second, we aimed to assess its preliminary efficacy. METHODS A mixed-method study design was used. Breast cancer survivors with persistent pain were recruited. After 6 weeks of engagement with the eHealth intervention, acceptability, comprehensibility, and satisfaction were measured quantitatively with a self-constructed questionnaire and described qualitatively using focus groups. A joint display was used to present the meta-interferences between data. Efficacy was assessed via mixed effects models with repeated measures (outcomes assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks). RESULTS Twenty-nine women with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery participated. Overall, the eHealth program was well received and experienced as easy to use and helpful. The eHealth intervention seems useful as an adjunct to comprehensive cancer aftercare. Efficacy estimates suggested a significant improvement in pain-related functioning, physical functioning, and quality of life. CONCLUSION A personalized eHealth intervention appears valuable for persistent pain management after breast cancer surgery. A large controlled clinical trial to determine effectiveness, and a full process evaluation, seems warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An De Groef
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT Research Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Belgium.
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Margaux Evenepoel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Van Dijck
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT Research Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lore Dams
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT Research Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haenen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT Research Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Louise Wiles
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Catley
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anna Vogelzang
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Hibbert
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bart Morlion
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Section Anesthesiology and Algology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lauren C Heathcote
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT Research Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alsaraireh M, Albashtawy M, Abdalrahim A, Alkhawaldeh A, Khatatbeh M, Qaddumi J, Albashtawy S, Albashtawy Z, Ibnian A, Ayed A, Suliman M, Alhroub N. Cancer pain management program: Patients' experiences-A qualitative study. Nurs Forum 2022; 57:773-784. [PMID: 35690909 DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients frequently experience unrelieved pain as a significant symptom. However, several studies have found that cancer-related pain is frequently undertreated. PURPOSE This study aimed to understand the pain experiences of cancer patients who were newly engaged in a multidisciplinary pain management program (PMP) at King Hussein Cancer Centre and still receiving cancer treatments and cancer pain management. METHODS A qualitative study design and semi-structured interviews were used to obtain data from 21 cancer patients who were purposefully selected. All patients had advanced cancer, including skeleton metastases. All female participants had breast cancer, and all male participants had prostate cancer. RESULTS It was found that the patient-healthcare professional relationship and satisfaction with services emerged as two themes in healthcare professionals' pain management. CONCLUSION The results from this study can offer a new understanding of the knowledge related to satisfaction of patients with cancer in terms of the quality of pain management. Additional qualitative studies are required to replicate the findings in populations from different backgrounds, ethnicities, and cultures experiencing cancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Asem Abdalrahim
- Community and Mental Health Department, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, AL al-Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan
| | | | | | - Jamal Qaddumi
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | | | | | - Ali Ibnian
- Faculty of Medicine, JUST, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Ahmad Ayed
- Faculty of Nursing, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine
| | - Mohammad Suliman
- Community and Mental Health Department, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, AL al-Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dziadzko M, Bouteleux A, Minjard R, Harich J, Joubert F, Pradat P, Pantel S, Aubrun F. Preoperative Education for Less Outpatient Pain after Surgery (PELOPS trial) in orthopedic patients-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:422. [PMID: 35598000 PMCID: PMC9123724 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06387-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Successful pain management after outpatient surgery requires proper education leading to correct decisions on the analgesics use at home. Despite different strategies adopted, up to ½ of patients receive little or no information about the treatment of postoperative pain, 1/3 of them are not able to follow postoperative analgesia instructions. This leads to higher rates of unmet needs in pain treatment, post-discharge emergency calls, and readmissions. Structured educational interventions using psychological empowering techniques may improve postoperative pain management. We hypothesize that preoperative education on use of an improved pain scale to make correct pain management decisions will improve the quality of post-operative pain management at home and reduce analgesics-related side effects. Methods A total of 414 patients scheduled for an outpatient orthopedic surgery (knee/shoulder arthroscopic interventions) are included in this randomized (1:1) controlled trial. Patients in the control arm receive standard information on post-discharge pain management. Patients in the experimental arm receive structured educational intervention based on the rational perception of postoperative pain and discomfort (anchoring and improved pain scale), and the proper use of analgesics. There is no difference in post-discharge analgesics regimen in both arms. Patients are followed for 30 days post-discharge, with the primary outcome expressed as total pain relief score at 5 days. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of severe pain during 30 days, changes in sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Assessment), and patients’ perception of postoperative pain management assessed with the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire at day 30 post-discharge. Discussion The developed intervention, based on an improved pain scale, offers the advantages of being non-surgery-specific, is easily administered in a short amount of time, and can be delivered individually or in-group, by physicians or nurses. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT03754699. Registered on November 27, 2018. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06387-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail Dziadzko
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. .,RESHAPE Lab, U1920, INSERM and Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France. .,Department of Pain treatment, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
| | - Axelle Bouteleux
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Raphael Minjard
- Department of Pain treatment, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Center of Research in Clinical Psychopathology and Psychology (CRPPC) University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Jack Harich
- BS Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Fanny Joubert
- Center for Clinical Research, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Pradat
- Center for Clinical Research, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Solene Pantel
- Center for Clinical Research, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Frederic Aubrun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,RESHAPE Lab, U1920, INSERM and Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.,Department of Pain treatment, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Evenepoel M, Haenen V, De Baerdemaecker T, Meeus M, Devoogdt N, Dams L, Van Dijck S, Van der Gucht E, De Groef A. Pain Prevalence During Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e317-e335. [PMID: 34563628 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Pain is one of the most complex and prevalent symptoms in the cancer population. Despite the protective role of acute cancer-related pain, it is also an important predictor for the likelihood of developing chronic pain after cancer treatment. OBJECTIVES Since the last systematic review on pain prevalence rates during cancer treatment dates already from 2016, the aim of the present systematic review was to provide an overview of pain prevalence rates during cancer treatment since this previous review. METHODS A systematic search of the literature, including studies between 2014 and 2020, was conducted using the databases Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane. Studies reporting pain prevalence rates during or within three months after curative cancer treatment was included. Title/abstract and full-text was screened double-blinded, followed by independent evaluation of the risk of bias. All prevalence rates were pooled within meta-analyses and a meta-regression was performed to clarify the amount of heterogeneity. RESULTS Of the 9052 studies, 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis of which 10 included breast cancer and two lung cancer patients. The pooled pain prevalence rate was 40% (95%CI 0.29-0.51), with a heterogeneity of 96%. Out of the meta-regression, only the covariate "method of pain measurement" significantly clarified the heterogeneity (P < 0.05), resulting in a residual heterogeneity of 94.88%. CONCLUSION Five years after the last systematic review published on this topic, pain is still very prevalent during cancer treatment. However, the pain prevalence rates were also very heterogeneous. These two findings emphasize the need for further research on the development of adequate pain assessment and pain management approaches during cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaux Evenepoel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (M.E., V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haenen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (M.E., V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (V.H., T.D.B., N.D., L.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tom De Baerdemaecker
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (V.H., T.D.B., N.D., L.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (M.E., V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (M.M.), Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (V.H., T.D.B., N.D., L.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (N.D.), Center for Lymphoedema, UZ Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lore Dams
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (M.E., V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (V.H., T.D.B., N.D., L.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sophie Van Dijck
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (M.E., V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elien Van der Gucht
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (M.E., V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (V.H., T.D.B., N.D., L.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - An De Groef
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (M.E., V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (V.H., T.D.B., N.D., L.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (V.H., M.M., L.D., S.V.D., E.V.G., A.D.G.), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Effects of Pharmacist Interventions on Pain Intensity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2022; 62:1313-1320.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
16
|
Lifestyle and Pain following Cancer: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2021; 11:jcm11010195. [PMID: 35011937 PMCID: PMC8745758 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This review discusses chronic pain, multiple modifiable lifestyle factors, such as stress, insomnia, diet, obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption and physical activity, and the relationship between these lifestyle factors and pain after cancer. Chronic pain is known to be a common consequence of cancer treatments, which considerably impacts cancer survivors' quality of life when it remains untreated. Improvements in lifestyle behaviour are known to reduce mortality, comorbid conditions (i.e., cardiovascular diseases, other cancer, and recurrence) and cancer-related side-effects (i.e., fatigue and psychological issues). An inadequate stress response plays an important role in dysregulating the body's autonomic, endocrine, and immune responses, creating a problematic back loop with pain. Next, given the high vulnerability of cancer survivors to insomnia, addressing and treating those sleep problems should be another target in pain management due to its capacity to increase hyperalgesia. Furthermore, adherence to a healthy diet holds great anti-inflammatory potential for relieving pain after cancer. Additionally, a healthy diet might go hand in hand with weight reduction in the case of obesity. Consuming alcohol and smoking have an acute analgesic effect in the short-term, with evidence lacking in the long-term. However, this acute effect is outweighed by other harms on cancer survivors' general health. Last, informing patients about the benefits of an active lifestyle and reducing a sedentary lifestyle after cancer treatment must be emphasised when considering the proven benefits of physical activity in this population. A multimodal approach addressing all relevant lifestyle factors together seems appropriate for managing comorbid conditions, side-effects, and chronic pain after cancer. Further research is needed to evaluate whether modifiable lifestyle factors have a beneficial influence on chronic pain among cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
17
|
Eisen T, Kooijstra EM, Groeneweg R, Verseveld M, Hidding J. The Needs and Experiences of Patients on Pain Education and the Clinical Reasoning of Physical Therapists Regarding Cancer-Related Pain. A Qualitative Study. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2021; 2:675302. [PMID: 35295492 PMCID: PMC8915681 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.675302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study offers direction for interaction between physical therapists and patients about cancer-related pain during physical training. The study may increase awareness of rehabilitation strategies for cancer-related pain during and after cancer treatment. Methods: Qualitative study, evaluating results of two qualitative studies. Data has been collected using semi-structured interviews, in which topics were discussed with patients and physical therapists. Respondents were adult patients with cancer in the Northern Netherlands with moderate to severe pain who followed physical training with a (oncologic) physical therapist. The physical therapists were respondents specialized in oncology and working with patients with cancer in a primary care setting in in the Netherlands. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Eighteen patients and fifteen physical therapists were interviewed. Data was categorized in statements regarding "patients' needs", "patients' experiences" and "clinical reasoning of the physical therapist". "Patients' needs" for education were personal and included needs for information about the cause, course and effect of pain in relation to cancer and/or medical treatment, needs for practical tools for reducing pain, needs for strategies dealing with pain in daily activities, and needs for information about additional treatment and care options. When discussing 'patients' experiences', patients mentioned that physical therapists are cautious to express their expectations of the progress of pain and to offer pain education with respect to the cause of pain, dealing with pain and limitations in daily life, exercising, posture, learning self-care and information about additional treatment and care options in cancer-related pain. Patients provided insight into their educational, mental, and social support relative to experiences with physical therapists. Additionally, when discussing the communication they experienced with physical therapists, patients used descriptors such as accessibility, empathy, trust, knowledge and eliminating uncertainties. Interviews with physical therapists regarding their clinical reasoning process in cancer-related pain described that they identified pain from anamnesis (medical history review) and performed screening and analysis for pain secondary to cancer (treatment), as type of pain and pain influencing factors. Thoughts and experiences about pain, the use of pain clinometry, the establishment of objectives and interventions for physical therapy and multidisciplinary treatment of cancer-related pain were also described. Conclusion: Patients with cancer-related pain during physical training have personal needs regarding pain education and experience that specialized oncologic physical therapists focus on patient-centered information and self-management support. Specialized oncologic physical therapists analyze pain in the anamnesis and keep in mind the origin and impact of pain for the patient during screening and treatment. Different methods of pain management are used. It is recommended that physical therapists who give physical training take the initiative to repeatedly discuss pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Michelle Verseveld
- Avans+, Master Oncologic Physical Therapy, University of Applied Sciences, Breda, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bennett MI, Allsop MJ, Allen P, Allmark C, Bewick BM, Black K, Blenkinsopp A, Brown J, Closs SJ, Edwards Z, Flemming K, Fletcher M, Foy R, Godfrey M, Hackett J, Hall G, Hartley S, Howdon D, Hughes N, Hulme C, Jones R, Meads D, Mulvey MR, O’Dwyer J, Pavitt SH, Rainey P, Robinson D, Taylor S, Wray A, Wright-Hughes A, Ziegler L. Pain self-management interventions for community-based patients with advanced cancer: a research programme including the IMPACCT RCT. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background
Each year in England and Wales, 150,000 people die from cancer, of whom 110,000 will suffer from cancer pain. Research highlights that cancer pain remains common, severe and undertreated, and may lead to hospital admissions.
Objective
To develop and evaluate pain self-management interventions for community-based patients with advanced cancer.
Design
A programme of mixed-methods intervention development work leading to a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial of a multicomponent intervention for pain management compared with usual care, including an assessment of cost-effectiveness.
Participants
Patients, including those with metastatic solid cancer (histological, cytological or radiological evidence) and/or those receiving anti-cancer therapy with palliative intent, and health professionals involved in the delivery of community-based palliative care.
Setting
For the randomised controlled trial, patients were recruited from oncology outpatient clinics and were randomly allocated to intervention or control and followed up at home.
Interventions
The Supported Self-Management intervention comprised an educational component called Tackling Cancer Pain, and an eHealth component for routine pain assessment and monitoring called PainCheck.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was pain severity (measured using the Brief Pain Inventory). The secondary outcomes included pain interference (measured using the Brief Pain Inventory), participants’ pain knowledge and experience, and cost-effectiveness. We estimated costs and health-related quality-of-life outcomes using decision modelling and a separate within-trial economic analysis. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per quality-adjusted life-year for the trial period.
Results
Work package 1 – We found barriers to and variation in the co-ordination of advanced cancer care by oncology and primary care professionals. We identified that the median time between referral to palliative care services and death for 42,758 patients in the UK was 48 days. We identified key components for self-management and developed and tested our Tackling Cancer Pain resource for acceptability. Work package 2 – Patients with advanced cancer and their health professionals recognised the benefits of an electronic system to monitor pain, but had reservations about how such a system might work in practice. We developed and tested a prototype PainCheck system. Work package 3 – We found that strong opioids were prescribed for 48% of patients in the last year of life at a median of 9 weeks before death. We delivered Medicines Use Reviews to patients, in which many medicines-related problems were identified. Work package 4 – A total of 161 oncology outpatients were randomised in our clinical trial, receiving either supported self-management (n = 80) or usual care (n = 81); their median survival from randomisation was 53 weeks. Primary and sensitivity analyses found no significant treatment differences for the primary outcome or for other secondary outcomes of pain severity or health-related quality of life. The literature-based decision modelling indicated that information and feedback interventions similar to the supported self-management intervention could be cost-effective. This model was not used to extrapolate the outcomes of the trial over a longer time horizon because the statistical analysis of the trial data found no difference between the trial arms in terms of the primary outcome measure (pain severity). The within-trial economic evaluation base-case analysis found that supported self-management reduced costs by £587 and yielded marginally higher quality-adjusted life-years (0.0018) than usual care. However, the difference in quality-adjusted life-years between the two trial arms was negligible and this was not in line with the decision model that had been developed. Our process evaluation found low fidelity of the interventions delivered by clinical professionals.
Limitations
In the randomised controlled trial, the low fidelity of the interventions and the challenge of the study design, which forced the usual-care arm to have earlier access to palliative care services, might explain the lack of observed benefit. Overall, 71% of participants returned outcome data at 6 or 12 weeks and so we used administrative data to estimate costs. Our decision model did not include the negative trial results from our randomised controlled trial and, therefore, may overestimate the likelihood of cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions
Our programme of research has revealed new insights into how patients with advanced cancer manage their pain and the challenges faced by health professionals in identifying those who need more help. Our clinical trial failed to show an added benefit of our interventions to enhance existing community palliative care support, although both the decision model and the economic evaluation of the trial indicated that supported self-management could result in lower health-care costs.
Future work
There is a need for further research to (1) understand and facilitate triggers that prompt earlier integration of palliative care and pain management within oncology services; (2) determine the optimal timing of technologies for self-management; and (3) examine prescriber and patient behaviour to achieve the earlier initiation and use of strong opioid treatment.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18281271.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael I Bennett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew J Allsop
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Bridgette M Bewick
- Psychological and Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Julia Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S José Closs
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Zoe Edwards
- School of Pharmacy, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Kate Flemming
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Marie Fletcher
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Division of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mary Godfrey
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julia Hackett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Geoff Hall
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Suzanne Hartley
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel Howdon
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Claire Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Jones
- Yorkshire Centre for Health Informatics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew R Mulvey
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John O’Dwyer
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sue H Pavitt
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Sally Taylor
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Angela Wray
- Psychological and Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Lucy Ziegler
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Park YJ, Lee MK. Effects of nurse-led nonpharmacological pain interventions for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nurs Scholarsh 2021; 54:422-433. [PMID: 34847285 DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to review the types of nurse-led nonpharmacological pain interventions (NPI) offered to cancer patients and/or family caregivers, and to determine a comprehensive and robust estimate of the effect size of nurse-led NPI for cancer patients on various pain-related outcomes. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies assessing nurse-led NPIs targeting cancer patients and published between January 2008 and December 2020 were identified by searching multiple literature databases, including MEDLINE® , EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ProQuest Medical Library, and CINAHL® . METHODS This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The selected randomized clinical trials were independently assessed for methodological quality. The effect sizes (ESs) of treatment were presented as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). FINDINGS A meta-analysis was performed to analyze data from 22 randomized clinical trials. Three types of nurse-led NPI were offered, mainly to cancer patients but also to some caregivers: music, physical, and psycho-educational interventions. The dose and duration of nonpharmacological interventions varied widely. The study participants ranged in age from 44.1 to 67.3 years. Meta-analysis indicated that, although these interventions had small effects in long-term (g = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.06-0.43, p = 0.011) to medium effects in short-term (g = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.001), they significantly reduced patients' pain, increased their knowledge of pain management, reduced barriers to pain management and pain coping, and improved other physical and emotional symptoms. The significance of the ES differed according to the type of intervention, with psycho-educational and physical NPIs having a significant but medium short-term ES, whereas music NPI had a significant but large short-term ES. Only psycho-educational NPIs had significant long-term effects. CONCLUSION The combined ES showed that these nurse-led NPIs were significantly effective in both the short and long-term. Types of intervention as a potential moderator were associated with short-term and long-term effects of nonpharmacological interventions on patient outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Research-tested interventions should be provided to help patients cope effectively with pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youn Jin Park
- College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Myung Kyung Lee
- College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Azizoddin DR, Adam R, Kessler D, Wright AA, Kematick B, Sullivan C, Zhang H, Hassett MJ, Cooley ME, Ehrlich O, Enzinger AC. Leveraging mobile health technology and research methodology to optimize patient education and self-management support for advanced cancer pain. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:5741-5751. [PMID: 33738594 PMCID: PMC8410657 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06146-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient education is critical for management of advanced cancer pain, yet the benefits of psychoeducational interventions have been modest. We used mobile health (mHealth) technology to better meet patients' needs. METHODS Using the Agile and mHealth Development and Evaluation Frameworks, a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, researchers, patients, and design specialists followed a four-phase iterative process to develop comprehensive, tailored, multimedia cancer pain education for a patient-facing smartphone application. The target population reviewed the content and provided feedback. RESULTS The resulting application provides comprehensive cancer pain education spanning pharmacologic and behavioral aspects of self-management. Custom graphics, animated videos, quizzes, and audio-recorded relaxations complemented written content. Computable algorithms based upon daily symptom surveys were used to deliver brief, tailored motivational messages that linked to more comprehensive teaching. Patients found the combination of pharmacologic and behavioral support to be engaging and helpful. CONCLUSION Digital technology can be used to provide cancer pain education that is engaging and tailored to individual needs. A replicable interdisciplinary and patient-centered approach to intervention development was advantageous. mHealth interventions may be a scalable approach to improve cancer pain. Frameworks that merge software and research methodology can be useful in developing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desiree R Azizoddin
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Thorn Building, Boston, MA, 13-1303, USA.
| | - Rosalind Adam
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Daniela Kessler
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexi A Wright
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Kematick
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clare Sullivan
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Haipeng Zhang
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham Digital Innovation Hub, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Ehrlich
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea C Enzinger
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Deshields TL, Wells-Di Gregorio S, Flowers SR, Irwin KE, Nipp R, Padgett L, Zebrack B. Addressing distress management challenges: Recommendations from the consensus panel of the American Psychosocial Oncology Society and the Association of Oncology Social Work. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71:407-436. [PMID: 34028809 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Distress management (DM) (screening and response) is an essential component of cancer care across the treatment trajectory. Effective DM has many benefits, including improving patients' quality of life; reducing distress, anxiety, and depression; contributing to medical cost offsets; and reducing emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Unfortunately, many distressed patients do not receive needed services. There are several multilevel barriers that represent key challenges to DM and affect its implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used as an organizational structure to outline the barriers and facilitators to implementation of DM, including: 1) individual characteristics (individual patient characteristics with a focus on groups who may face unique barriers to distress screening and linkage to services), 2) intervention (unique aspects of DM intervention, including specific challenges in screening and psychosocial intervention, with recommendations for resolving these challenges), 3) processes for implementation of DM (modality and timing of screening, the challenge of triage for urgent needs, and incorporation of patient-reported outcomes and quality measures), 4) organization-inner setting (the context of the clinic, hospital, or health care system); and 5) organization-outer setting (including reimbursement strategies and health-care policy). Specific recommendations for evidence-based strategies and interventions for each of the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research are also included to address barriers and challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa L Deshields
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Stacy R Flowers
- Department of Family Medicine, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio
| | - Kelly E Irwin
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan Nipp
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lynne Padgett
- Department of Psychology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Brad Zebrack
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The Experience of Complex Pain Dynamics in Oncology Outpatients: A Longitudinal Qualitative Analysis. Cancer Nurs 2021; 44:136-144. [PMID: 31569180 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few qualitative studies of cancer patients' everyday experiences with pain exist within the large body of cancer pain research. Longitudinal qualitative studies are particularly sparse, and no studies have qualitatively described patients' pain experience over time during participation in a self-management intervention. OBJECTIVE To longitudinally describe patients' pain experiences during a 10-week pain self-management intervention. METHODS This qualitative study was embedded in a randomized controlled trial of a psychoeducational pain management intervention. The data consisted of transcribed audio recordings of each intervention session. An emergent, interpretive approach was used in this longitudinal qualitative analysis. RESULTS Forty-two adult patients were included. The analysis revealed the strikingly dynamic nature of individual patient's pain experiences. Multiple facets of pain contributed to its dynamic nature, including pain in changing locations, co-occurring sources of pain, and varying patterns of pain intensity over time. For individual patients, the cumulative effect of these multiple facets resulted in a phenomenon we termed "complex pain dynamics." CONCLUSION The results contribute to knowledge about the dynamic nature of cancer patients' pain experiences over a relatively short period. They suggest the need for a new paradigm for management of pain in cancer patients and raise questions about the interpretation of randomized controlled trial results in the absence of qualitative data. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Frequent assessments and reassessments of pain are needed in cancer patients with the ongoing development of highly individualized self-management strategies. A large repertoire of interventions is needed to effectively manage pain in cancer patients over time.
Collapse
|
23
|
Ehrlich O, Brandoff D, Gorman DP, Berry DL. Nurse-Led Motivational Interviewing for Setting Functional Cancer Pain Goals. Pain Manag Nurs 2021; 22:716-723. [PMID: 33962871 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Persons with advanced cancers experience high rates of pain. Nursing interventions for pain, which are tailored to the individual patient, may support motivation to engage in self-management and should include setting of realistic functional goals. For patients with advanced cancer, functional pain goals include personally important activities, measurable across clinical encounters. However, limited evidence exists regarding nursing assessment of functional pain goals. To address this gap, we piloted use of a motivational interviewing intervention. Motivational interviewing is a clinical technique for clarifying goals and related impediments, such as cognitive and emotional factors underlying pain management behaviors. DESIGN Pilot feasibility testing. METHODS Palliative care patients with cancer-related pain completed up to four intervention sessions, the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and an author-developed acceptability questionnaire. Feasibility success was determined by 60% of participants completing at least two interventions. Fidelity to the intervention was assessed using the Motivational Interviewing Skills for Healthcare Encounters tool. RESULTS Sixty-seven percent completed two interventions. Participants reported that interventions were helpful, worthwhile, and recommended. Mean pain self-efficacy scores (0-60 possible) rose from 31.5 (SD = 11.2) at intervention 1 to 35.5 (SD = 13) after intervention 4. Intervention fidelity was maintained. CONCLUSIONS Participants were willing to engage in multiple motivational interviewing conversations focused on pain management behaviors related to functional goals. Based on these findings about motivational interviewing for functional goals and patient willingness to set them, these conversations may have a place in clinical care as an element of pain assessment and intervention tailoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Ehrlich
- University of Massachusetts Amherst, College of Nursing, Amherst, Massachusetts; Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Douglas Brandoff
- Schwartz Center Rounds, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel P Gorman
- Adult Palliative Care Clinic, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donna L Berry
- University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Van der Gucht E, Dams L, Haenen V, Godderis L, Morlion B, Bernar K, Evenepoel M, De Vrieze T, Vandendriessche T, Asnong A, Geraerts I, Devoogdt N, De Groef A, Meeus M. Effectiveness of perioperative pain science education on pain, psychological factors and physical functioning: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35:1364-1382. [PMID: 33813914 DOI: 10.1177/02692155211006865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of pain science education on pain, psychological factors and physical functioning in adults who underwent surgery. DATA SOURCES A systematic literature search of English articles using PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS The search strategy was constructed as follows: (((pain) AND (education)) OR (pain education)) AND (surgery). Only controlled quantitative studies in adults reporting outcome(s) on pain, psychological factors and/or physical functioning were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools. P-values and corresponding effect sizes for interaction-effect (time × group) portrayed the difference in change over time between groups were of interest. The last search was conducted on February 28, 2021. RESULTS Nine papers (n = 1078) were deemed eligible for this review. Two randomized controlled trials showed significant interaction effects. Breast cancer patients who had received one preoperative pain science education session showed a significant increase in postoperative pain compared to controls (P-value = 0.0394). Furthermore, psychological factors (pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia) decreased in participants who had received pain science education before total knee arthroplasty, while this was not the case in the control group (P-value < 0.001, ƞ2p:0.11). CONCLUSIONS Overall, pain science education did not result in any significant postoperative effects on pain, psychological factors and/or physical functioning compared to controls. There is currently no strong evidence for the implementation of pain science education in the perioperative period.Registration number: PROSPERO: ID 161267, registration number CRD42020161267.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elien Van der Gucht
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lore Dams
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haenen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lode Godderis
- Centre for Environment and Health, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,IDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Morlion
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Section Anaesthesiology & Algology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Bernar
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Margaux Evenepoel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Tessa De Vrieze
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Anne Asnong
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Inge Geraerts
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Lymphoedema, UZ Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An De Groef
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tyson DM, Chavez MN, Lubrano B, Lake P, Gutierrez A, Marshall VK, Rigg KK, Henderson H, Pabbathi S, Sherry P, Rajasekhara S. Understanding Cancer Survivors' Educational Needs About Prescription Opioid Medications: Implications for Cancer Education and Health Literacy. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:215-224. [PMID: 33428119 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-01957-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Cancer survivors' perceptions of prescription opioid medication (POM) and the health communications they receive about POM's safety and effectiveness are embedded within the national discourse of the opioid epidemic. Using qualitative methods, this community-based study explored the health communication and the educational needs of diverse cancer survivors who received opioid agonist treatment to manage cancer pain. Our community-based sample consisted of 25 cancer survivors, 24 healthcare providers, and six community-level stakeholders. Over half of the cancer survivors interviewed were from underrepresented minority groups (52% African American and 12% Hispanic/Latino). The data were analyzed using applied thematic analysis techniques. The over-arching themes include the need to (1) provide clear, consistent, and comprehensive education and information about POM to ensure safe use; (2) discuss the risks, benefits, and proper use of POM in the treatment of cancer-related pain; (3) communicate realistic expectations and address common misconceptions about pain; and (4) address cancer survivor beliefs and concerns surrounding fear of addiction. Our findings highlight the need for effective cancer education and communication about opioid agonist treatment and POM in plain simple language that is easy to understand, relevant, and culturally appropriate. Recommendations for cancer education and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinorah Martinez Tyson
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612-3805, USA.
| | - Melody N Chavez
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612-3805, USA
| | - Barbara Lubrano
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Paige Lake
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612-3805, USA
| | - Ana Gutierrez
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612-3805, USA
| | - Victoria K Marshall
- College of Nursing, University of South Florida, 12912 Bruce B. Downs, MDC 22, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Khary K Rigg
- Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Heather Henderson
- Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. SOC 107, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA
| | - Smitha Pabbathi
- College of Nursing, University of South Florida, 12912 Bruce B. Downs, MDC 22, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Peggie Sherry
- Faces of Courage, 10006 Cross Creek Blvd #519, Tampa, FL, 33647-2595, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Manfuku M, Nishigami T, Mibu A, Yamashita H, Imai R, Tanaka K, Kitagaki K, Hiroe K, Sumiyoshi K. Effect of perioperative pain neuroscience education in patients with post-mastectomy persistent pain: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:5351-5359. [PMID: 33677717 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06103-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Central sensitization (CS)-related symptoms and pain catastrophizing contribute to persistent post-mastectomy pain (PPMP). Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is effective in reducing CS-related symptoms and pain catastrophizing in patients with chronic pain. However, to date, no intervention study of PNE has been conducted to patients with PPMP. This study was aimed to examine whether PNE is more effective than biomedical education (BME) for PPMP. METHODS In this retrospective case-control study, 118 patients were included. We intervened different patients at different times as follows: (1) a BME group (n = 58) of patients who received BME combined with physiotherapy and (2) a PNE group (n = 60) of patients who received PNE combined with physiotherapy. One year after surgery, we assessed pain intensity and interference (brief pain inventory [BPI]), CS-related symptoms (central sensitization inventory [CSI]), and pain catastrophizing (pain catastrophizing scale [PCS]). Propensity score matching was used to reduce or minimize selection bias and confounding biases and to make the number of cases in both groups match 1:1. RESULTS Propensity score matching generated the BME group (n = 51) and the PNE group (n = 51). The BPI score, CSI score, and PCS score were statistically significantly lower in the PNE group than in the BME group (all, p < 0.05). The effect sizes for the BPI intensity (r = 0.31) were moderate. CONCLUSIONS PNE resulted in a better outcome of pain management with less functional disability and CS-related symptoms compared to BME after breast surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Manfuku
- Department of Rehabilitation, Breast Care Sensyu Clinic, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Nishigami
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | - Akira Mibu
- Department of Physical Therapy, Konan Women's University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Yamashita
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nozomi Orthopaedic Clinic Saijo, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ryota Imai
- Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka Kawasaki Rehabilitation University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kazufumi Kitagaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kanamori Hiroe
- Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Care Sensyu Clinic, Osaka, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rosa WE, Riegel B, Ulrich CM, Chittams J, Quinn R, Meghani SH. The Association Between Analgesic Treatment Beliefs and Electronically Monitored Adherence for Cancer Pain. Oncol Nurs Forum 2021; 48:45-58. [PMID: 33337438 DOI: 10.1188/21.onf.45-58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether clusters based on analgesic treatment beliefs among patients with cancer predict objective analgesic adherence. SAMPLE & SETTING 207 patients with cancer in the outpatient setting who were aged 18 years or older, self-identified as White or African American, were diagnosed with solid tumor or multiple myeloma, and were prescribed at least one around-the-clock analgesic prescription for reported cancer pain. METHODS & VARIABLES This study is a secondary analysis of an existing dataset. General linear modeling with a backward elimination approach was applied to determine whether previously identified analgesic treatment belief clusters, as well as sociodemographic, clinical, and pain variables, were associated with adherence behaviors. RESULTS Significant explanatory factors were experiential in nature and included sociodemographic, clinical, and pain-related variables, explaining 21% of the variance in analgesic adherence. Analgesic belief clusters were not predictive of adherence. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Future research should examine sociodemographic and other clinical factors, as well as the influence of analgesic treatment beliefs, to better understand adherence behaviors among patients with cancer.
Collapse
|
28
|
Fu MR, McTernan ML, Qiu JM, Ko E, Yazicioglu S, Axelrod D, Guth A, Fan Z, Sang A, Miaskowski C, Wang Y. The Effects of Kinect-Enhanced Lymphatic Exercise Intervention on Lymphatic Pain, Swelling, and Lymph Fluid Level. Integr Cancer Ther 2021; 20:15347354211026757. [PMID: 34160294 PMCID: PMC8226364 DOI: 10.1177/15347354211026757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The-Optimal-Lymph-Flow (TOLF) intervention aims to promote lymph flow through therapeutic lymphatic exercises to relieve lymphatic pain, swelling, lymphedema symptoms, and to decrease lymph fluid levels among breast cancer survivors. To enhance the efficacy of the TOLF intervention, an innovative, intelligent, Kinect-enhanced lymphatic exercise intervention (Kinect-TOLF) was developed to teach patients to perform the lymphatic exercises correctly. OBJECTIVES This feasibility trial aimed to determine the feasibility, usability, and effects of the Kinect-TOLF on lymphatic pain, swelling, lymphedema symptoms, and lymph fluid levels. METHODS A single-arm feasibility trial with a pre- and post-test design was employed to recruit 30 breast cancer survivors with persistent lymphatic pain or swelling. Patients received a single training session to learn how to perform the lymphatic exercises using the Kinect-TOLF program. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, t-test, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, linear regressions, and Cohen's d were performed for data analysis. Qualitative data were assessed for common themes. RESULTS The Kinect-TOLF was effective in training patients to perform the lymphatic exercises correctly with high user satisfaction. Significant reductions were found in scores of lymphatic pain (MedΔ = -1.00, CI = [-1.5, -0.1], P = .004), arm/hand swelling (MedΔ = -1.00, CI = [-1.5, -0.5], P = .004), total swelling (MedΔ = -1.5, CI = [-2.0, -1.0], P = .003), number of lymphedema symptoms (MΔ = -3.8, CI = [-5.5, -2.1], P < .001), and lymphedema symptom severity (MΔ = -5.3, CI = [-9.5, -1.1], P = .016). A significant reduction in lymph fluid levels was found in mean L-Dex scores (MΔ = -2.68, CI = [-4.67, -0.69], P = .010). Greater decrease in mean L-Dex scores were found in patients with abnormal lymph fluid levels (L-Dex ≥ 7.1) (MΔ = -5.19, CI = [-1.75, -8.63], P = .008). Patients' qualitative feedback supported the results of the study. CONCLUSIONS The Kinect-TOLF is safe, feasible, and effective in reducing lymphatic pain, swelling, lymphedema symptoms, and in decreasing lymph fluid levels. Future research should focus on a randomized clinical trial to confirm the unique or synergistic efficacy of the Kinect-TOLF in comparison with current lymphedema treatment and other forms of exercises or movement therapy. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with US ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03999177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei R. Fu
- Boston College William F. Connell
School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Eunjung Ko
- The Ohio State University College of
Nursing, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Simay Yazicioglu
- New York University Tandon School of
Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | | | - Amber Guth
- New York University School of Medicine,
New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhipeng Fan
- New York University Tandon School of
Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Anna Sang
- New York University College of Arts and
Science, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Yao Wang
- New York University Tandon School of
Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pas R, Leysen L, De Goeij W, Vossebeld L, Van Wilgen P, De Groef A, De Kooning M. Pain Neuroscience Education in cancer survivors with persistent pain: A pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2020; 24:239-244. [PMID: 33218517 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the Pilot Study: Pain Neuroscience Education in Cancer Survivors and describe the innovative educational component of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE). DESIGN Quasi experimental design. METHOD The PNE program, encompassing a one-on-one education session and an information leaflet was given to 30 cancer survivors. At baseline and two weeks after the PNE, participants were asked to fill out following outcome measures; pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and HRQoL. FINDINGS Following PNE, a significant decrease on pain intensity (p = 0.001), on the SF-36 subscale pain (p = 0.003) and for the following PCS subscales: Helplessness (p < 0.001), Rumination (p = 0.002) and Total score (p < 0.001) was found compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS Although the current results need to be verified in a larger randomized, controlled trial, preliminary evidence shows a decrease in pain intensity and pain catastrophizing following PNE in cancer survivors with persistent pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roselien Pas
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Laurence Leysen
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wanda De Goeij
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium; The Berekuyl Academy, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - Leonieke Vossebeld
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium; The Berekuyl Academy, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Van Wilgen
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium; Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Centre, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - An De Groef
- KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Margot De Kooning
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zielińska A, Włodarczyk M, Makaro A, Sałaga M, Fichna J. Management of pain in colorectal cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103122. [PMID: 33171427 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review we focus on the pathophysiology of CRC-related pain and discuss currently applied pain management. Pain is a symptom reported by over 70 % of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. It remains a feared and debilitating consequence of both cancer and cancer-related treatment. There are many options for pain management in CRC, consisting of intravenous, oral or topical medications. In order to address the full spectrum of pain, proper treatment should address the nociceptive, neuropathic and/or psychogenic pain component. Currently available methods do not bring pain relief to satisfying number of patients and, if used improperly, can cause a number of complications. Therefore, future treatments should focus primarily on alleviating pain, but also on reducing possible side effects. In this article we cover recent and promising pharmacological and non- pharmacological developments emerging in the field of CRC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Zielińska
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Marcin Włodarczyk
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland; Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Adam Makaro
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Maciej Sałaga
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Jakub Fichna
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chi NC, Barani E, Fu YK, Nakad L, Gilbertson-White S, Herr K, Saeidzadeh S. Interventions to Support Family Caregivers in Pain Management: A Systematic Review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:630-656.e31. [PMID: 32339651 PMCID: PMC7483228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Family caregivers encounter many challenges when managing pain for their loved ones. There is a lack of clear recommendations on how to prepare caregivers in pain management. OBJECTIVES To evaluate existing interventions that support family caregivers in providing pain management to patients with all disease types. METHODS Four electronic databases were systematically searched (PubMed, Cumulative Index for Nursing Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Scopus) using index and keyword methods for articles published before December 2019. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality. RESULTS The search identified 6851 studies, and 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only two studies exclusively focused on noncancer populations (8%). Three types of interventions were identified in this review: educational interventions, cognitive-behavioral interventions, and technology-based interventions. Both educational and cognitive-behavioral interventions improved family caregiver and patient outcomes, but the content and intensity of these interventions in these studies varied widely, and there was a limited number of randomized clinical trials (68%). Hence, it is unclear what strategies are most effective to prepare family caregivers in pain management. Technology-based interventions were feasible to support family caregivers in providing pain management. CONCLUSION Providing adequate pain management training can improve patient and family caregiver outcomes. However, the most effective interventions for family caregivers are still unclear. More rigorous and replicable clinical trials are needed to examine the effects of educational interventions, cognitive-behavioral interventions, and technology-based interventions. Also, more studies are needed in patients with a noncancer diagnosis or multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nai-Ching Chi
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
| | - Emelia Barani
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Kai Fu
- College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Lynn Nakad
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Keela Herr
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Villegas Estévez F, López Alarcón MD, Alonso Babarro A, Olay Gayoso L, de Castro J, Lería-Gelabert M, Melogno-Klinkas M. Breakthrough cancer pain treatment in Spain: physicians' perception of current opioids utilization and prescription. Curr Med Res Opin 2020; 36:1383-1391. [PMID: 32453602 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1775073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Multiple reasons for suboptimal treatment of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) have been reported in the literature. We aimed to ascertain the perception of physicians on the potential inappropriate use and prescription of rapid-onset opioids (ROOs) for breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) and the causes thereof.Methods: Observational study based on an online survey addressed to doctors from different specialties (radiation oncology, medical oncology, anesthesia, palliative care and general practitioners) with experience in the management of BTcP in the Spanish public health setting.Results: A total of 114 eligible specialists mainly from radiation oncology (37.7%), medical oncology (24.6%) and pain units (18.4%) participated in the study. Most agreed on important aspects of BTcP management, such as their preference for ROOs or the need for early follow-up after treatment initiation. However, their answers revealed a lack of standardization of BTcP diagnosis. Half of respondents believed that their BTcP patients might misuse ROOs. Physicians polled believed that lack of training in pain management (71.9%) and inadequate BTcP diagnosis and evaluation (66.7%) were the greatest obstacles for prescribing opioids. Specialists also thought that they do not provide the necessary information to patients (51.8%) and caregivers (57.9%) to guarantee the correct use of these drugs.Conclusions: These results are of utmost importance as they highlight the need to increase physicians' awareness of BTcP and its management and the need to improve communication with patients and their caregivers. Our findings also indicate the need for future research on the possible misuse of opioids in BTcP patients and its causes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Luis Olay Gayoso
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Javier de Castro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Implementation of a nurse-led self-management support intervention for patients with cancer-related pain: a cluster randomized phase-IV study with a stepped wedge design (EvANtiPain). BMC Cancer 2020; 20:559. [PMID: 32546177 PMCID: PMC7296932 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06729-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pain self-management support interventions were effective in controlled clinical trials and meta analyses. However, implementation of these complex interventions may not translate into identical effects. This paper evaluates the implementation of ANtiPain, a cancer pain self-management support intervention in routine clinical practice according to the Reach Efficacy-Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework. Methods In this cluster randomized study with a stepped wedge design, N = 153 adult patients with cancer-related pain were recruited from 01/17 to 05/18 on 17 wards of 3 hospitals in Vienna, Austria. ANtiPain entailed a face-to-face in-hospital session by a trained nurse to prepare discharge according to key strategies, information on pain self-management, and skills building. After discharge, cancer-pain self-management was coached via phone calls. Patient-level data were collected at recruitment, and 2, 4 and 8 weeks after discharge via postal or online questionnaire. Primary outcome was pain interference with daily activities. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, self-efficacy, and patient satisfaction. Organizational-level data (e.g., on implementation procedures) were collected by study or intervention nurses. The mixed model to analyze patient-level data included a random intercept and a random slope for individual and a random intercept for ward. Results Recruitment was slower than expected and unevenly distributed over wards and hospitals. The face-to-face session was clinically feasible (mean duration = 33 min) as well as the mean amount (n = 2) and duration of phone calls (mean = 17 min). Only 16 (46%) of 35 trained nurses performed the intervention on nine wards. To deal with the loss of power, analyses were adapted. Overall effects on pain interference were not significant. However, effects were significant in sub analyses of the nine wards that recruited patients in the intervention period (p = .009). Regarding secondary outcomes, the group-by-time effect was significant for self-efficacy (p = .033), and patient satisfaction with information on pain-self-management (p = .002) and in-hospital pain management (p = .018). Conclusions The implementation of ANtiPain improved meaningful patient outcomes on wards that applied the intervention routinely. Our analyses showed that the implementation benefited from being embedded in larger scale projects to improve cancer pain management and that the selection of wards with a high percentage of oncology patients may be crucial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02891785 Date of registration: September 8, 2016.
Collapse
|
34
|
"Theory Does Not Get You From Bed to Wheelchair": A Qualitative Study on Patients' Views of an Education Program in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. Rehabil Nurs 2020; 44:247-253. [PMID: 29889696 DOI: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate a new nurse-guided patient education program in spinal cord injury rehabilitation with particular focus on the patients' perspectives and experiences. DESIGN Longitudinal qualitative study. METHODS We conducted face-to-face interviews with 10 rehabilitation patients and used the content analysis method to analyze the data. FINDINGS Patients emphasized the importance of the practical training of the education program. This impacted their well-being as well as their autonomy. They rated discussions with primary nurses and peers about physical or psychological concerns. However, after discharge, the learning process was ongoing, and patients experienced the transition to living at home as a major challenge. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE This research provides valuable information from the patients' perspective for enhancing spinal cord injury patient education. Situational learning, based on the practical parts of patient education and working with peers, is highlighted.
Collapse
|
35
|
Chapman EJ, Edwards Z, Boland JW, Maddocks M, Fettes L, Malia C, Mulvey MR, Bennett MI. Practice review: Evidence-based and effective management of pain in patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med 2020; 34:444-453. [PMID: 31980005 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319896955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain of a moderate or severe intensity affects over half of patients with advanced cancer and remains undertreated in at least one-third of these patients. AIM The aim of this study was to provide a pragmatic overview of the evidence supporting the use of interventions in pain management in advanced cancer and to identify where encouraging preliminary results are demonstrated but further research is required. DESIGN A scoping review approach was used to examine the evidence supporting the use of guideline-recommended interventions in pain management practice. DATA SOURCES National or international guidelines were selected if they described pain management in adult cancer patients and were written within the last 5 years in English. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 2014 to January 2019) was searched for 'cancer' AND 'pain' in the title, abstract or keywords. A MEDLINE search was also made. RESULTS A strong opioid remains the drug of choice for treating moderate or severe pain. Bisphosphonates and radiotherapy are also effective for cancer-related bone pain. Optimal management requires a tailored approach, support for self-management and review of treatment outcomes. There is likely a role for non-pharmacological approaches. Paracetamol should not be used in patients taking a strong opioid to treat pain. Cannabis-based medicines are not recommended. Weak opioids, ketamine and lidocaine are indicated in specific situations only. CONCLUSION Interventions commonly recommended by guidelines are not always supported by a robust evidence base. Research is required to evaluate the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-convulsants, anti-depressants, corticosteroids, some invasive anaesthetic techniques, complementary therapies and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma J Chapman
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
| | - Zoe Edwards
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
| | - Jason W Boland
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Fettes
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Matthew R Mulvey
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael I Bennett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Makhlouf SM, Pini S, Ahmed S, Bennett MI. Managing Pain in People with Cancer-a Systematic Review of the Attitudes and Knowledge of Professionals, Patients, Caregivers and Public. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:214-240. [PMID: 31119708 PMCID: PMC7076060 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01548-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Cancer pain is a common symptom experienced by patients, caused either by the disease or its treatment. Morphine remains the most effective and recommended treatment for cancer pain. However, cancer patients still do not receive appropriate management for their pain, and under-treatment is common. Lack of knowledge and negative attitudes towards cancer pain and analgesia among professionals, patients and family caregivers are reported as one of the most common barriers to effective cancer pain management (CPM). To systematically review research on the nature and impact of attitudes and knowledge towards CPM, a systematic literature search of 6 databases (the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE) was undertaken in July 2018. Additionally, hand-searching of Google, Google Scholar and reference lists was conducted. The inclusion criteria were adult (18-65 years of age), studies which included attitudes and knowledge towards CPM, studies written in English, published literature only and cross-sectional design. Included studies were critically appraised by two researchers independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute Analytical Cross Sectional Studies Assessment (JBI-ACSSA). A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The main finding was that among professionals, patients, caregivers and the public there were similar attitudinal barriers to effective CPM. The most commonly cited barriers were fear of drug addiction, tolerance of medication and side effects of opioids. We also found differences between professional groups (physicians versus nurses) and between different countries based on their potential exposure to palliative care training and services. There are still barriers to effective CPM, which might result in unrelieved cancer pain. Therefore, more educational programmes and training for professionals on CPM are needed. Furthermore, patients, caregivers, and the public need more general awareness and adequate level of knowledge about CPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim M Makhlouf
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
| | - Simon Pini
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Shenaz Ahmed
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Michael I Bennett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mubita WM, Richardson C, Briggs M. Patient satisfaction with pain relief following major abdominal surgery is influenced by good communication, pain relief and empathic caring: a qualitative interview study. Br J Pain 2020; 14:14-22. [PMID: 32110394 DOI: 10.1177/2049463719854471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Monitoring and improving the quality of care is an ever increasing concern for health care organisations. Measuring the effectiveness of clinical outcomes is done by looking at specific markers of high quality care. Pain management is considered one of the markers of high quality care and satisfaction with pain management is a crucial and important quality assurance marker; yet, we know little about what contributes to a patient's decision about satisfaction. Methods A qualitative study drawing on phenomenological approach aiming to evaluate the perspective of patients experiencing post-operative pain. Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were recruited from a Renal Transplant and Urology ward in the North of England, UK. Data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews and were analysed using Colaizzi's approach. Results Ten patients participated in the study and three themes emerged from the analysis. The findings of this study revealed that in order to achieve satisfaction with the management of pain, patient care has to include information delivery which is timely and adequate according to a patient's individual needs, nurses should have a caring attitude and pain should be well controlled. Conclusion Satisfaction with pain management is influenced by good communication and information transfer, appropriate pain management and an empathic presence throughout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Womba Musumadi Mubita
- Research and Innovation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Clinical Trials Management Offices, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Cliff Richardson
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Briggs
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper aims to give the specialist and non-specialist alike an overview of the considerations involved in the management of cancer-related pain in the older population. RECENT FINDINGS Comprehensive guidelines on cancer pain management have been published recently by expert bodies. Cancer pain differs in many respects to other pain conditions and we are likely to encounter it more frequently in older patients in the future. The elderly are more sensitive to the effects of many analgesic medications. The elderly patient with cancer pain presents a unique challenge to the treating physician. The biological effects of ageing impact on the efficacy of many pain management strategies as well as its diagnosis and assessment. Treatment options can be broadly divided into pharmacological, non-pharmacological and interventional. A multidisciplinary approach and frequent re-assessment are essential in achieving favourable outcomes in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Finnerty
- Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Level 4, Whitty Building, Eccles Street, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
| | - Áine O'Gara
- Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Level 4, Whitty Building, Eccles Street, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland
| | - Donal J Buggy
- Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Level 4, Whitty Building, Eccles Street, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Salim N, Joshua R, AbuBaker N, Chehab F, Jose A. Effect of a Nursing In-Service Education Program on Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitudes towards Pain Management in a Governmental Hospital in the United Arab Emirates: Experimental Random Assignment Study. DUBAI MEDICAL JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.1159/000503560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
40
|
Joypaul S, Kelly F, McMillan SS, King MA. Multi-disciplinary interventions for chronic pain involving education: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223306. [PMID: 31577827 PMCID: PMC6774525 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There have been growing recommendations to include education in multi-disciplinary interventions targeting chronic pain management. However, effects of this strategy on short- and long-term self-management of chronic pain, remain largely unexplored. OBJECTIVES 1. To provide an updated overview of studies that report on the impact of patient education in multi-disciplinary interventions, on self-management of chronic pain; 2. To explore associations between education and chronic pain self-management techniques; and 3. To identify the format and duration of suitable chronic pain interventions targeted at patient self-management. METHODS Design: Narrative systematic literature review of randomised or controlled study designs. Data Sources: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO. Participants: Adult patients with chronic pain of any aetiology participating in multi-disciplinary programs that included education. Main outcome measures: Assessments of level of pain, function, quality of life, self-efficacy, self-management, and any other relevant assessments. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: PRISMA guidelines, Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and TIDieR model. RESULTS Database searching identified 485 potential papers. After removal of duplicates, and irrelevant articles by title and abstract, 120 full-text articles were reviewed and 27 studies were included in this systematic review. Studies were predominantly from the United States (n = 8; 29.6%). Over one hundred outcome measures were identified across all studies, with significant variation also observed in terms of how chronic pain duration was defined, and how education was delivered to participants. Overall, positive benefits of education were reported. CONCLUSIONS Education, as part of multi-disciplinary programs, is likely to improve self-management and self-efficacy in people with chronic pain of any aetiology. Heterogeneity in terms of: chronic pain duration; educational resources; healthcare professionals; and outcome measures, were identified as limitations. Further research, in the form of Randomised Controlled Trials addressing these limitations, is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirdhya Joypaul
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Fiona Kelly
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sara S. McMillan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michelle A. King
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Söderlund Schaller A, Dragioti E, Liedberg GM, Larsson B. Are patient education and self-care advantageous for patients with head and neck cancer? A feasibility study. Nurs Open 2019; 6:1528-1541. [PMID: 31660181 PMCID: PMC6805323 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM This study evaluates whether patient education and individually self-care reduces pain and improves QoL, mood and sleep during and after radiotherapy treatment for patients with head and neck cancer. DESIGN A longitudinal, two-armed feasibility study design was performed. METHODS Sixty-four participants with curative intent were included in the study. All participants answered questions about pain three times a week and completed a survey questionnaire about pain, QoL, psychological aspects and barriers towards pain management at baseline, at 4 weeks and at 10 weeks. Thirty-four of the participants attended in two education sessions on pain based on their beliefs about pain and received individualized self-care instructions based on their weekly rating of pain. RESULT This study did not find any significant group differences for the pain, QoL, mood and sleep.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Söderlund Schaller
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Medical and Health SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Elena Dragioti
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Medical and Health SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Gunilla M. Liedberg
- Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Social and Welfare StudiesFaculty of Health Sciences, Campus Norrkoping, Linköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Britt Larsson
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Medical and Health SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nijs J, Wijma AJ, Leysen L, Pas R, Willaert W, Hoelen W, Ickmans K, Wilgen CPV. Explaining pain following cancer: a practical guide for clinicians. Braz J Phys Ther 2019; 23:367-377. [PMID: 30606621 PMCID: PMC6823686 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is one of the most prevalent and debilitating symptom following cancer treatment. OBJECTIVES This paper entails a practical guide for clinicians willing to apply pain neuroscience education (PNE) in this specific population, or clinical researchers willing to examine the effects of PNE in patients suffering from pain following cancer. RESULTS Patient-specific information (i.e. beliefs, cognitions, pain memories, social factors) as well as identification of the dominant pain mechanism are needed to tailor the education to the specific needs and beliefs of the patient. Therapists require an in-depth understanding of pain mechanisms, the skills to explain to their patients various pain mechanisms, specific communication skills (e.g. Socratic-style dialogof education) and experience with current evidence-based biopsychosocially-driven pain management strategies for successful implementation of PNE in the clinic. Rather than purely focusing on the biomedical characteristics of pain following cancer (e.g., tissue damage due to past cancer treatment), PNE implies teaching patients about the underlying biopsychosocial mechanisms of pain. Its application is backed-up by mounting evidence supporting the effectiveness of PNE in non-cancer pain populations, and a pilot study in patients having pain following cancer. CONCLUSION PNE is a potential solution to improve pain outcome in cancer survivors. Further research using sufficiently powered and well-designed randomized clinical trials should be conducted to examine the potential of PNE in patients having pain following cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Nijs
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Amarins J Wijma
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laurence Leysen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roselien Pas
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ward Willaert
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wouter Hoelen
- De Berekuyl, Private Practice for Physiotherapy in Oncology & Lymphology, Hierden, The Netherlands; The Berekuyl Academy, Hierden, The Netherlands
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Paul van Wilgen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Testing the Implementation of a Pain Self-management Support Intervention for Oncology Patients in Clinical Practice: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study (ANtiPain). Cancer Nurs 2019; 41:367-378. [PMID: 28537957 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In oncology, pain control is a persistent problem. Significant barriers to cancer pain management are patient related. Pain self-management support interventions have shown to reduce pain intensity and patient-related barriers. Comparative effectiveness research is a suitable approach to test whether effects are sustained in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE In this pilot randomized controlled trial, the implementation of the ANtiPain intervention into clinical practice was tested to assess the effects on pain intensity, function-related outcomes, self-efficacy, and patient-related barriers to pain management to prepare a larger effectiveness trial. METHODS Within 14 months, 39 adult oncology patients with pain scores of 3 or higher on a 10-point numeric rating scale were recruited in an academic comprehensive cancer center in Southern Germany. Patients in the control group (n = 19) received standard care. Patients in the intervention group (n = 20) received ANtiPain, a cancer pain self-management support intervention based on 3 key strategies: provision of information, skill building, and nurse coaching. An intervention session was performed in-hospital. After discharge, follow-up was provided via telephone calls. Data were collected at baseline and 1 and 6 weeks after discharge. Effect sizes were calculated for all outcomes. RESULTS Large effects were found for activity hindrance (Cohen d = 0.90), barriers (d = 0.91), and self-efficacy (d = 0.90). Small to moderate effects were found for average and worst pain (Cohen d = 0.17-0.45). CONCLUSIONS Key findings of this study involved function-related outcomes and self-efficacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Because these outcomes are particularly meaningful for patients, the integration of ANtiPain to routine clinical practice may be substantial. A larger study will be based on these findings.
Collapse
|
44
|
Tanzi S, Leo SD, Mazzini E, Castagnetti M, Turrà C, Peruselli C, Costantini M. Long-term sustainability of a quality improvement program on cancer pain management: a complex intervention in an inpatient setting. TUMORI JOURNAL 2019; 106:25-32. [DOI: 10.1177/0300891619869513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Several approaches towards pain control for admitted cancer patients have been suggested by the literature without achieving satisfactory results. In this quality improvement project, we proposed a multicomponent intervention. Measures: A set of indicators was established for each component of the project. The feasibility of both the intervention and its evaluation system was measured. According to the literature review and the analysis of the local context, 5 active components were identified, piloted, and assessed: training of ward professionals, education of patients and nonprofessional caregivers, regular pain assessment, specialist-level pain consultation procedures, and involvement of hospital management. Results: Multiprofessional training programs with daily discussions, daily pain assessment, and a readily available specialized palliative care service seem to be the active components of this complex intervention. The quality improvement project achieved 2 years sustainability. Conclusion: Consolidated educational and organizational methodologies support the feasibility of this complex intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Tanzi
- Palliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Silvia Di Leo
- Psycho-oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Elisa Mazzini
- Medical Direction, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Mattia Castagnetti
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Caterina Turrà
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Costantini
- Scientific Directorate, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Swarm RA, Paice JA, Anghelescu DL, Are M, Bruce JY, Buga S, Chwistek M, Cleeland C, Craig D, Gafford E, Greenlee H, Hansen E, Kamal AH, Kamdar MM, LeGrand S, Mackey S, McDowell MR, Moryl N, Nabell LM, Nesbit S, O'Connor N, Rabow MW, Rickerson E, Shatsky R, Sindt J, Urba SG, Youngwerth JM, Hammond LJ, Gurski LA. Adult Cancer Pain, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:977-1007. [PMID: 31390582 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 270] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Adult Cancer Pain have undergone substantial revisions focusing on the appropriate and safe prescription of opioid analgesics, optimization of nonopioid analgesics and adjuvant medications, and integration of nonpharmacologic methods of cancer pain management. This selection highlights some of these changes, covering topics on management of adult cancer pain including pharmacologic interventions, nonpharmacologic interventions, and treatment of specific cancer pain syndromes. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Adult Cancer Pain addresses additional aspects of this topic, including pathophysiologic classification of cancer pain syndromes, comprehensive pain assessment, management of pain crisis, ongoing care for cancer pain, pain in cancer survivors, and specialty consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Swarm
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Judith A Paice
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Doralina L Anghelescu
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ellin Gafford
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Heather Greenlee
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | - Susan LeGrand
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | -
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Nina O'Connor
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Jill Sindt
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Edwards H, Bennett M. Access to Opioids for Patients with Advanced Disease. Curr Pharm Des 2019; 25:3203-3208. [PMID: 31333089 DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190716095337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Pain at the end of life is common in both malignant and non-malignant disease. It is feared by patients, their families and careers, and professionals. Effective pain control can be achieved for the majority of patients at the end of life using a multimodal approach. Pharmacological management relies predominantly on strong opioids. In spite of this, evidence suggests that under treatment of pain is common resulting in unnecessary suffering. Multiple barriers to use of opioids have been identified. Patient barriers include reluctance to report pain and to take analgesics. Professional barriers include inadequate pain assessment and lack of specialist knowledge and confidence in opioid therapy. Fear of side effects including respiratory depression affects patients and professionals alike. The impact of the "opioid epidemic", with increasing prescribed and illicit opioid use around the world, has also led to increasingly stringent regulation and concern about under prescribing in palliative care. System barriers to use of opioids at the end of life result from limited opioid availability in some countries and also inconsistent and limited access to palliative care. Multiple interventions have been developed to address these barriers, targeted at patients, professionals and systems. There is increasing evidence to suggest that complex interventions combining a number of different approaches are most effective in optimising pain outcomes for patients at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Edwards
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Bennett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Prevost V, Heutte N, Leconte A, Licaj I, Delorme C, Clarisse B. Effectiveness of a therapeutic patient education program in improving cancer pain management: EFFADOL, a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:673. [PMID: 31286871 PMCID: PMC6615097 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5836-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite numerous guidelines, nearly one of two patients with cancer pain remains undertreated, thereby affecting their quality of life. Active patient involvement through Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) is considered as a relevant strategy to overcoming hurdles in pain management. The aim of the EFFADOL study is to assess the effectiveness of a TPE program in improving cancer pain management. Methods/design The EFFADOL study is a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. A total of 260 cancer patients with unbalanced background pain will be randomised over the institutional level, i.e. stepped-wedge cluster design. Six clusters will be formed, one at the regional level of “Basse-Normandie” for patients receiving the educational approach by health providers already trained to TPE. Then, five additional centers will be gradually included at the national level, making it possible to compare the “conventional” management of pain (before medical staff training to TPE) with the educational approach (after being trained). The main study parameter is pain interference on daily life assessed with the self-administrated and validated Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire. Secondary objectives comprised the evaluation of patients’ adherence to pain education program, the description of pain intensity, pain relief, analgesic adherence and pain emotional impact. Educational dimension of the program will be evaluated through the patients’ acquisition of knowledge and skills about their pain and treatment as well as their self-efficacy to participate actively in pain management. The patient’s feeling of pain changes will be measured. Finally, the satisfaction of participants and educators will be reported. We hypothetise active involvement of patients in TPE will lead to an improved pain management compared to standard care. Discussion Analyzing the impact of a TPE program in cancer pain patients will improve their pain management and quality of life. We expect that the dissemination of our project educational approach through the French territory will be accompanied by long term change in clinical practices with mutual benefit to patients and caregiver-educators. Trial registration NCT03297723, registered: 09/28/2017. Protocol version: Version n°1.1 dated from 2016/09/08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Prevost
- University of Normandy, 14000, Caen, France. .,UMR 1086 INSERM « ANTICIPE », Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
| | - Natacha Heutte
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Alexandra Leconte
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Idlir Licaj
- UMR 1086 INSERM « ANTICIPE », Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.,Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Claire Delorme
- Bayeux Hospital, 14400, Bayeux, France.,Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy, 14400, Bayeux, France
| | - Bénédicte Clarisse
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8070979. [PMID: 31284377 PMCID: PMC6678417 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8070979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain during, and especially after, cancer remains underestimated and undertreated. Moreover, both patients and health care providers are not aware of potential benefits of rehabilitation strategies for the management of pain during and following cancer treatment. In this paper, we firstly provided a state-of-the-art overview of the best evidence rehabilitation modalities for patients having (persistent) pain during and following cancer treatment, including educational interventions, specific exercise therapies, manual therapies, general exercise therapies and mind-body exercise therapies. Secondly, the findings were summarized from a clinical perspective and discussed from a scientific perspective. In conclusion, best evidence suggests that general exercise therapy has small pain-relieving effects. Supporting evidence for mind-body exercise therapy is available only in breast cancer patients. At this moment, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the use of specific exercises and manual therapy at the affected region for pain relief during and after cancer treatment. No clinically relevant results were found in favor of educational interventions restricted to a biomedical approach of pain. To increase available evidence these rehabilitation modalities should be applied according to, and within, a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial pain management approach. Larger, well-designed clinical trials tailored to the origin of pain and with proper evaluation of pain-related functioning and the patient’s pain experience are needed.
Collapse
|
49
|
Smith TG, Troeschel AN, Castro KM, Arora NK, Stein K, Lipscomb J, Brawley OW, McCabe RM, Clauser SB, Ward E. Perceptions of Patients With Breast and Colon Cancer of the Management of Cancer-Related Pain, Fatigue, and Emotional Distress in Community Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1666-1676. [PMID: 31100037 PMCID: PMC6804889 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pain, fatigue, and distress are common among patients with cancer but are often underassessed and undertreated. We examine the prevalence of pain, fatigue, and emotional distress among patients with cancer, as well as patient perceptions of the symptom care they received. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventeen Commission on Cancer-accredited cancer centers across the United States sampled patients with local/regional breast (82%) or colon (18%) cancer. We received 2,487 completed surveys (61% response rate). RESULTS Of patients, 76%, 78%, and 59% reported talking to a clinician about pain, fatigue, and distress, respectively, and 70%, 61%, and 54% reported receiving advice. Sixty-one percent of patients experienced pain, 74% fatigue, and 46% distress. Among those patients experiencing each symptom, 58% reported getting the help they wanted for pain, 40% for fatigue, and 45% for distress. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed that patients experiencing symptoms were significantly more likely to have talked about and received advice on coping with these symptoms. In addition, patients who were receiving or recently completed curative treatment reported more symptoms and better symptom care than did those who were further in time from curative treatment. CONCLUSION In our sample, 30% to 50% of patients with cancer in community cancer centers did not report discussing, getting advice, or receiving desired help for pain, fatigue, or emotional distress. This finding suggests that there is room for improvement in the management of these three common cancer-related symptoms. Higher proportions of talk and advice among those experiencing symptoms imply that many discussions may be patient initiated. Lower rates of talk and advice among those who are further in time from treatment suggest the need for more assessment among longer-term survivors, many of whom continue to experience these symptoms. These findings seem to be especially important given the high prevalence of these symptoms in our sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Neeraj K. Arora
- Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Kevin Stein
- Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Cancer Support Community, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Prevost V, Delorme C, Heutte N, Leconte A, Bechet C, Licaj I, Bignon R, Bisson C, Cauchin S, Gicquère M, Grach MC, Guillaumé C, Le Garrec J, Ropartz MC, Roux N, Sep Hieng V, Le Chevalier A, Clarisse B. Evaluation of patients' needs to design and assess a patient education program in cancer pain. J Pain Res 2019; 12:1813-1823. [PMID: 31239759 PMCID: PMC6560184 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s197920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Patient education constitutes a relevant strategy to improve pain management. In the field of therapeutic patient education (TPE), we aimed 1) to assess pain impact in cancer patients, 2) to identify patients' educative needs in pain management, and 3) to refine research criteria for its future evaluation. Patients and methods: Pain intensity, relief and interference were assessed in 75 cancer patients with unbalanced background pain. Self-assessment questionnaire evaluated i) patients' pain management and ii) their knowledge and needs in TPE. Results: Most patients experienced pain for more than 6 months and 41.6% reported adequate pain relief. Understanding pain and pain management were major patients' preferences (>58%). Most patients declared they knew their pain treatments, but fewer than half of them were able to name them. However, education concerning pain treatment was considered as essential in <30% of patients. Almost all patients (97.1%) stated pain education as beneficial, with a preference for individualized sessions (41.2%). In addition, the assessment criteria for its future evaluation were refined. Conclusion: Targeted population mainly concerned patients with persistent pain. Only half of patients reported pain relief despite antalgics. Patient education was declared as beneficial for almost all participants. Practice implications: Tailoring a pain TPE on patients' needs has the potential to help them to optimally manage their pain daily.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Prevost
- UMR 1086 Inserm ANTICIPE (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancer Treatment and Prevention) and University of Normandy , Caen, France
| | - C Delorme
- Pain Assessment and Treatment Centre, Bayeux Hospital , Bayeux, France.,Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France
| | - N Heutte
- Clinical Research Unit, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - A Leconte
- Clinical Research Unit, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - C Bechet
- Pharmacie de la Croix d'Or , Paris, France
| | - I Licaj
- Clinical Research Unit, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - R Bignon
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain and Palliative Care Unit, Lisieux Hospital , Lisieux, France
| | - C Bisson
- Pain Assessment and Treatment Centre, Bayeux Hospital , Bayeux, France.,Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France
| | - S Cauchin
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain Assessment and Treatment Consultation, Alençon-Mamers Intercommunal Hospital , Alençon, France
| | - M Gicquère
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain and Palliative Care Unit, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - M C Grach
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain and Palliative Care Unit, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - C Guillaumé
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain and Palliative Care Unit, University Hospital , Caen, France
| | - J Le Garrec
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain Assessment and Treatment Consultation, Alençon-Mamers Intercommunal Hospital , Alençon, France
| | - M C Ropartz
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain Assessment and Treatment Centre, Avranches-Granville Hospital , Avranches, France
| | - N Roux
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain and Palliative Care Unit, University Hospital , Caen, France
| | - V Sep Hieng
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain and Palliative Care Unit, Lisieux Hospital , Lisieux, France
| | - A Le Chevalier
- Regional Pain Network for Lower Normandy , Bayeux, France.,Pain Assessment and Treatment Centre, Avranches-Granville Hospital , Avranches, France
| | - B Clarisse
- Clinical Research Unit, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|