1
|
Lecy E, Linn-Evans ME, Amundsen-Huffmaster SL, Palnitkar T, Patriat R, Chung JW, Noecker AM, Park MC, McIntyre CC, Vitek JL, Cooper SE, Harel N, Johnson MD, MacKinnon CD. Neural pathways associated with reduced rigidity during pallidal deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. J Neurophysiol 2024; 132:953-967. [PMID: 39110516 PMCID: PMC11427047 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00155.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) can markedly reduce muscle rigidity in people with Parkinson's disease (PD); however, the mechanisms mediating this effect are poorly understood. Computational modeling of DBS provides a method to estimate the relative contributions of neural pathway activations to changes in outcomes. In this study, we generated subject-specific biophysical models of GPi DBS (derived from individual 7-T MRI), including pallidal efferent, putamenal efferent, and internal capsule pathways, to investigate how activation of neural pathways contributed to changes in forearm rigidity in PD. Ten individuals (17 arms) were tested off medication under four conditions: off stimulation, on clinically optimized stimulation, and on stimulation specifically targeting the dorsal GPi or ventral GPi. Quantitative measures of forearm rigidity, with and without a contralateral activation maneuver, were obtained with a robotic manipulandum. Clinically optimized GPi DBS settings significantly reduced forearm rigidity (P < 0.001), which aligned with GPi efferent fiber activation. The model demonstrated that GPi efferent axons could be activated at any location along the GPi dorsal-ventral axis. These results provide evidence that rigidity reduction produced by GPi DBS is mediated by preferential activation of GPi efferents to the thalamus, likely leading to a reduction in excitability of the muscle stretch reflex via overdriving pallidofugal output.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Subject-specific computational models of pallidal deep brain stimulation, in conjunction with quantitative measures of forearm rigidity, were used to examine the neural pathways mediating stimulation-induced changes in rigidity in people with Parkinson's disease. The model uniquely included internal, efferent and adjacent pathways of the basal ganglia. The results demonstrate that reductions in rigidity evoked by deep brain stimulation were principally mediated by the activation of globus pallidus internus efferent pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Lecy
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Maria E Linn-Evans
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | | | - Tara Palnitkar
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Remi Patriat
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Jae Woo Chung
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Angela M Noecker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Michael C Park
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Jerrold L Vitek
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Scott E Cooper
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Noam Harel
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Matthew D Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Colum D MacKinnon
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bulut E, Johansen PM, Elbualy A, Kalman C, Mayer R, Kato N, Salmeron de Toledo Aguiar R, Pilitsis JG. How Long Does Deep Brain Stimulation Give Patients Benefit? Neuromodulation 2024:S1094-7159(24)00128-4. [PMID: 39001725 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One of the most common questions patients ask when they are contemplating deep brain stimulation (DBS) is how long it will last. To guide physicians in answering this query, we performed a scoping review to assess the current state of the literature and to identify the gaps that need to be addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from January 1987 (advent of DBS literature) to June 2023 including human and modeling studies written in English. For longevity of therapy data, only studies with a mean follow-up of ≥three years were included. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers (JP and RM) performed a title screen. Of the 734 articles, 205 were selected by title screen and 109 from abstract review. Ultimately, a total of 122 articles were reviewed. The research questions we explored were 1) how long can the different components of the DBS system maintain functionality? and 2) how long can DBS remain efficacious in treating Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, and other disorders? RESULTS We showed that patients with PD, ET, and dystonia maintain a considerable long-term benefit in motor scores seven to ten years after implant, although the percentage improvement decreases over time. Stimulation off scores in PD and ET show worsening, consistent with disease progression. Battery life varies by the disease treated and the programming settings used. There remains a paucity of literature after ten years, and the impact of new device technology has not been classified to date. CONCLUSION We reviewed existing data on DBS longevity. Overall, outcomes data after ten years of therapy are substantially limited in the current literature. We recommend that physicians who have data for patients with DBS exceeding this duration publish their results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esin Bulut
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - P Mitchell Johansen
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Alya Elbualy
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Cheyenne Kalman
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Ryan Mayer
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Nicholas Kato
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | | | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cavallieri F, Mulroy E, Moro E. The history of deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2024; 121:105980. [PMID: 38161106 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is an established and effective treatment for several movement disorders (tremor, Parkinson's disease, and dystonia), and is under investigation in numerous other neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, the origins and development of this neurofunctional technique are not always well understood and recognized. In this mini-review, we review the history of DBS, highlighting important milestones and the most remarkable protagonists (neurosurgeons, neurologists, and neurophysiologists) who pioneered and fostered this therapy throughout the 20th and early 21st century. Alongside DBS historical markers, we also briefly discuss newer developments in the field, and the future challenges which accompany such progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cavallieri
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor & Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Eoin Mulroy
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mathiopoulou V, Rijks N, Caan MWA, Liebrand LC, Ferreira F, de Bie RMA, van den Munckhof P, Schuurman PR, Bot M. Utilizing 7-Tesla Subthalamic Nucleus Connectivity in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:333-339. [PMID: 35216874 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a highly effective surgical treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Combining 7.0-Tesla (7T) T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences allows for selective segmenting of the motor part of the STN and, thus, for possible optimization of DBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS 7T T2 and DWI sequences were obtained, and probabilistic segmentation of motor, associative, and limbic STN segments was performed. Left- and right-sided motor outcome (Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) scores were used for evaluating the correspondence between the active electrode contacts in selectively segmented STN and the clinical DBS effect. The Bejjani line was reviewed for crossing of segments. RESULTS A total of 50 STNs were segmented in 25 patients and proved highly feasible. Although the highest density of motor connections was situated in the dorsolateral STN for all patients, the exact partitioning of segments differed considerably. For all the active electrode contacts situated within the predominantly motor-connected segment of the STN, the average hemi-body Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor improvement was 80%; outside this segment, it was 52% (p < 0.01). The Bejjani line was situated in the motor segment for 32 STNs. CONCLUSION The implementation of 7T T2 and DWI segmentation of the STN in DBS for PD is feasible and offers insight into the location of the motor segment. Segmentation-guided electrode placement is likely to further improve motor response in DBS for PD. However, commercially available DBS software for postprocessing imaging would greatly facilitate widespread implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Niels Rijks
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthan W A Caan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luka C Liebrand
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francisca Ferreira
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Rob M A de Bie
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maarten Bot
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim A, Yang HJ, Kwon JH, Kim MH, Lee J, Jeon B. Mortality of Deep Brain Stimulation and Risk Factors in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A National Cohort Study in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e10. [PMID: 36647215 PMCID: PMC9842484 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate 1) long-term outcomes of deep brain stimulation (DBS), such as mortality after DBS as well as the causes of death, 2) demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing mortality, and 3) comorbidities affecting mortality after DBS in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS This study analyzed the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Information Database. Data on patients with PD diagnosis codes from 2002 to 2019 were extracted and analyzed. Data on the causes of death were obtained by linking the causes of death to data from Statistics Korea. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was used for survival analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals. Regarding comorbidities such as PD dementia and fracture, which did not satisfy the assumption for the proportional HR, time-dependent Cox analysis with the Mantel-Byar method was used. RESULTS From 2005 to 2017, among 156,875 patients diagnosed with PD in Korea, 1,079 patients underwent DBS surgery, and 251 (23.3%) had died by 2019. The most common cause of death (47.1%) was PD. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the higher the age at diagnosis and surgery, the higher the mortality rate. The men and medical aid groups had significantly higher mortality rates. PD dementia and fracture were identified as risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION Older age at diagnosis and surgery, being male, the use of medical aid, and the comorbidity of dementia and fractures were associated with a higher risk of mortality after DBS in patients with PD. Neurologists should consider these risk factors in assessing the prognosis of PD patients undergoing DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahro Kim
- Department of Neurology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Hui-Jun Yang
- Department of Neurology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Jee-Hyun Kwon
- Department of Neurology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Min-Ho Kim
- Informatization Department, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jiho Lee
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
| | - Beomseok Jeon
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim A, Kim HJ, Kim A, Kim Y, Kim A, Ong JNA, Park HR, Paek SH, Jeon B. The mortality of patients with Parkinson's disease with deep brain stimulation. Front Neurol 2023; 13:1099862. [PMID: 36726749 PMCID: PMC9885091 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1099862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is effective in improving motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aimed to investigate mortality associated with bilateral STN DBS in patients with PD and to assess the factors associated with mortality and causes of death after DBS. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 257 patients with PD who underwent bilateral STN DBS at the Movement Disorder Center at Seoul National University Hospital between March 2005 and November 2018. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and annually thereafter. The cause and date of death were obtained from interviews with caregivers or from medical certificates at the last follow-up. Results Of the 257 patients with PD, 48 patients (18.7%) died, with a median time of death of 11.2 years after surgery. Pneumonia was the most common cause of death. Older age of disease onset, preoperative falling score while on medication, and higher preoperative total levodopa equivalent daily dose were associated with a higher risk of mortality in time-dependent Cox regression analysis. Conclusion These results confirm the mortality outcome of STN DBS in patients with advanced PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahro Kim
- Department of Neurology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Han-Joon Kim
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Aryun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Kim
- Department of Neurology, Young Tong Hyo Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ahwon Kim
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jed Noel A. Ong
- Department of Neurosciences, Makati Medical Center, Makati, Philippines
| | - Hye Ran Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Ha Paek
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea,Sun Ha Paek ✉
| | - Beomseok Jeon
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea,*Correspondence: Beomseok Jeon ✉
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Park HR, Im HJ, Park J, Yoon BW, Lim YH, Song EJ, Kim KR, Lee JM, Park K, Park KH, Park HJ, Shin JH, Woo KA, Lee JY, Park S, Kim HJ, Jeon B, Paek SH. Long-Term Outcomes of Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Patients With Parkinson's Disease: 10 Years and Beyond. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:726-733. [PMID: 36084204 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) represents an effective treatment for severe Parkinson's disease (PD), but little is known about the long-term benefit. OBJECTIVE To investigate the survival rate and long-term outcome of DBS. METHODS We investigated all 81 patients including 37 males and 44 females who underwent bilateral STN DBS from March 2005 to March 2008 at a single institution. The current survival status of the patients was investigated. Preoperative and postoperative follow-up assessments were analyzed. RESULTS The mean age at the time of surgery was 62 (range 27-82) years, and the median clinical follow-up duration was 145 months. Thirty-five patients (43%) died during the follow-up period. The mean duration from DBS surgery to death was 110.46 ± 40.8 (range 0-155) months. The cumulative survival rate is as follows: 98.8 ± 1.2% (1 year), 95.1 ± 2.4% (5 years), and 79.0 ± 4.5% (10 years). Of the 81 patients, 33 (40%) were ambulatory up to more than 11 years. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score was significantly improved until 5 years after surgery although it showed a tendency to increase again after 10 years. The patient group with both electrodes located within the STN showed a higher rate of survival and maintained ambulation. CONCLUSION STN DBS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with advanced PD. This study based on the long-term follow-up of large patient populations can be used to elucidate the long-term fate of patients who underwent bilateral STN DBS for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Ran Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung-Jun Im
- Department of Applied Bioengineering, Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeongbin Park
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Woo Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Hoon Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Jin Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Ran Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Meen Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Kawngwoo Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Kwang Hyon Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea
| | - Hyun Joo Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Hwan Shin
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Ah Woo
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Young Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suyeon Park
- Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han-Joon Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Beomseok Jeon
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Ha Paek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Hypoxia/Ischemia Disease Institute, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernández-García C, Monje MH, Gómez-Mayordomo V, Foffani G, Herranz R, Catalán MJ, González-Hidalgo M, Matias-Guiu J, Alonso-Frech F. Long-term directional deep brain stimulation: Monopolar review vs. local field potential guided programming. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:727-736. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
9
|
Bjerknes S, Toft M, Brandt R, Rygvold TW, Konglund A, Dietrichs E, Andersson S, Skogseid IM. Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: 5-Year Extension Study of a Randomized Trial. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2022; 9:48-59. [PMID: 35005065 PMCID: PMC8721829 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Parkinson's disease (PD) long-term motor outcomes of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) are well documented, while comprehensive reports on non-motor outcomes are fewer and less consistent. Objective To report motor and non-motor symptoms after 5-years of STN-DBS. Methods We performed an open 5-year extension study of a randomized trial that compared intraoperative verification versus mapping of STN using microelectrode recordings. Changes from preoperative to 5-years of STN-DBS were evaluated for motor and non-motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS I-IV), sleep disturbances (PDSS), autonomic symptoms (Scopa-Aut), quality of life (PDQ-39) and cognition through a neuropsychological test battery. We evaluated whether any differences between the two randomization groups were still present, and assessed preoperative predictors of physical dependence after 5 years of treatment using logistic regression. Results We found lasting improvement of off-medication motor symptoms (total MDS-UPDRS III, bradykinetic-rigid symptoms and tremor), on-medication tremor, motor fluctuations, and sleep disturbances, but reduced performance across all cognitive domains, except verbal memory. Reduction of verbal fluency and executive function was most pronounced the first year and may thus be more directly related to the surgery than worsening in other domains. The group mapped with multiple microelectrode recordings had more improvement of bradykinetic-rigid symptoms and of PDQ-39 bodily discomfort sub-score, but also more reduction in word fluency. Older age was the most important factor associated with physical dependence after 5 years. Conclusion STN-DBS offers good long-term effects, including improved sleep, despite disease progression. STN-DBS surgery may negatively impact verbal fluency and executive function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Bjerknes
- Department of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - Mathias Toft
- Department of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - Reidun Brandt
- Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | | | - Ane Konglund
- Department of Neurosurgery Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - Espen Dietrichs
- Department of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - Stein Andersson
- Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway.,Department of Psychosomatic and CL Psychiatry Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chau MJ, Quintero JE, Monje PV, Voss SR, Welleford AS, Gerhardt GA, van Horne CG. Using a Transection Paradigm to Enhance the Repair Mechanisms of an Investigational Human Cell Therapy. Cell Transplant 2022; 31:9636897221123515. [PMID: 36169034 PMCID: PMC9523845 DOI: 10.1177/09636897221123515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
One promising strategy in cell therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD) is to harness a patient's own cells to provide neuroprotection in areas of the brain affected by neurodegeneration. No treatment exists to replace cells in the brain. Thus, our goal has been to support sick neurons and slow neurodegeneration by transplanting living repair tissue from the peripheral nervous system into the substantia nigra of those with PD. Our group has pioneered the transplantation of transection-activated sural nerve fascicles into the brain of human subjects with PD. Our experience in sural nerve transplantation has supported the safety and feasibility of this approach. As part of a paradigm to assess the reparative properties of human sural nerve following a transection injury, we collected nerve tissue approximately 2 weeks after sural nerve transection for immunoassays from 15 participants, and collected samples from two additional participants for single nuclei RNA sequencing. We quantified the expression of key neuroprotective and select anti-apoptotic genes along with their corresponding protein levels using immunoassays. The single nuclei data clustered into 10 distinctive groups defined on the basis of previously published cell type-specific genes. Transection-induced reparative peripheral nerve tissue showed RNA expression of neuroprotective factors and anti-apoptotic factors across multiple cell types after nerve injury induction. Key proteins of interest (BDNF, GDNF, beta-NGF, PDGFB, and VEGF) were upregulated in reparative tissue. These results provide insight on this repair tissue's utility as a neuroprotective cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica J. Chau
- Brain Restoration Center, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jorge E. Quintero
- Brain Restoration Center, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Paula V. Monje
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Department of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Stephen Randal Voss
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Andrew S. Welleford
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Greg A. Gerhardt
- Brain Restoration Center, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Craig G. van Horne
- Brain Restoration Center, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bove F, Mulas D, Cavallieri F, Castrioto A, Chabardès S, Meoni S, Schmitt E, Bichon A, Di Stasio E, Kistner A, Pélissier P, Chevrier E, Seigneuret E, Krack P, Fraix V, Moro E. Long-term Outcomes (15 Years) After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Parkinson Disease. Neurology 2021; 97:e254-e262. [PMID: 34078713 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) on motor complications in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) beyond 15 years after surgery. METHODS Data on motor complications, quality of life (QoL), activities of daily living, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores, dopaminergic treatment, stimulation measures, and side effects of STN-DBS were retrospectively retrieved and compared before surgery, at 1 year, and beyond 15 years after bilateral STN-DBS. RESULTS Fifty-one patients with 17.06 ± 2.18 years STN-DBS follow-up were recruited. Compared to baseline, the time spent with dyskinesia and the time spent in the "off" state were reduced by 75% (p < 0.001) and by 58.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, dopaminergic drugs were reduced by 50.6% (p < 0.001). Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire total score and the emotional function and social function domains improved 13.8% (p = 0.005), 13.6% (p = 0.01), and 29.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. Few and mostly manageable device-related adverse events were observed during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS STN-DBS is effective beyond 15 years from the intervention, notably with significant improvement in motor complications and stable reduction of dopaminergic drugs. Furthermore, despite the natural continuous progression of PD with worsening of levodopa-resistant motor and nonmotor symptoms over the years, patients undergoing STN-DBS could maintain an improvement in QoL. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that, for patients with PD, STN-DBS remains effective at treating motor complications 15 years after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Bove
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Delia Mulas
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Cavallieri
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Anna Castrioto
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Chabardès
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Sara Meoni
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Emmanuelle Schmitt
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Amélie Bichon
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Enrico Di Stasio
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Kistner
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Pélissier
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Eric Chevrier
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Eric Seigneuret
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Paul Krack
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Valerie Fraix
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Elena Moro
- From the Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology (F.B., D.M., F.C., A.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., V.F., E.M.), CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Neurology Unit (F.B.) and Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (E.D.S.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Department of Neurosciences (F.B.) and Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (E.D.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Institute of Neurology (D.M.), Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia; Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department (F.C.), Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program (F.C.), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (A.C., S.C., S.M., E.S., A.B., A.K., P.P., E.C., E.S., V.F., E.M.), University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble; Division of Neurosurgery (S.C., E.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Grenoble Alpes University, France; Department of Health Sciences (S.M.), University of Milan, Italy; and Department of Neurology (P.K.), Bern University Hospital, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boura I, Haliasos N, Giannopoulou ΙA, Karabetsos D, Spanaki C. Combining Device-Aided Therapies in Parkinson's Disease: A Case Series and a Literature Review. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021; 8:750-757. [PMID: 34307748 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS), levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) and subcutaneous apomorphine infusion are device-aided therapies (DATs) for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). We present a case series from the Cretan PD Registry who required 2 DATs for optimal management along with a systematic review of similar studies. Cases From 2009 to 2020, we retrospectively studied all PD patients who were simultaneously treated with 2 DATs. Six patients on DBS required an infusion treatment for persisting or re-emergent fluctuations because of disease progression. Two patients on LCIG infusion received DBS as a levodopa-sparing strategy because of drug-induced complications. Fluctuations and quality of life improved in all patients. Literature review We identified 4 case series, 1 prospective and 1 retrospective study that included a total of 50 DBS-treated patients who required an infusion therapy. Improvement in motor outcomes, assessed in different ways, was a constant finding. Conclusions Selected PD patients on 1 DAT may experience additional benefit from a second DAT, for several reasons along the course of their disease. Although infusion therapies optimize dopaminergic drug delivery in fluctuating DBS-treated patients, DBS added on LCIG treatment has an additive symptomatic effect that allows levodopa dose reduction in patients with drug-induced side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iro Boura
- University of Crete, School of Medicine Crete Greece.,Department of Neurology University Hospital of Heraklion Crete Greece
| | - Nikolaos Haliasos
- Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital of Heraklion Crete Greece.,Essex Neurosciences Center Queen Mary University of London London United Kingdom
| | - Ιrene-Areti Giannopoulou
- University of Crete, School of Medicine Crete Greece.,Department of Neurology University Hospital of Heraklion Crete Greece
| | | | - Cleanthe Spanaki
- University of Crete, School of Medicine Crete Greece.,Department of Neurology University Hospital of Heraklion Crete Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Volonté MA, Clarizio G, Galantucci S, Scamarcia PG, Cardamone R, Barzaghi LR, Falautano M, Mortini P, Comi G, Filippi M. Long term follow-up in advanced Parkinson's disease treated with DBS of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurol 2021; 268:2821-2830. [PMID: 33598766 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10430-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, affecting both motor and non-motor systems. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) has been an approved treatment for PD for more than 30 years, but few data are available regarding its long-term effectiveness. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate patients' outcome, both from a motor and non-motor perspective, 9 to 14 years after DBS implantation. We have investigated patients with advanced PD and treated with STN-DBS, in relation to key clinical features of PD. METHODS 18 patients were assessed both retrospectively and prospectively. They underwent motor examination, neuropsychological evaluation and questionnaires on the quality of life, preoperatively, as well as 1, 9 and 14 years after DBS surgery. All patients were implanted with STN-DBS at San Raffaele Hospital between 2004 and 2010. RESULTS 13 males and five females underwent DBS implantation with a mean PD duration of 11 years. Stimulation significantly improved med-off/stim-on condition up to 9 years, compared to the preoperative off state, and med-on/stim-on condition at 14 years, compared to med-on/stim-off state. Long term improvement specifically involved tremor and rigidity, as well as dopaminergic daily dose. At the same time, STN-DBS had no long-lasting effect on axial symptoms and cognitive functions. CONCLUSIONS STN-DBS remains an effective therapy for advanced PD, also over the years. Despite the underlying progression of the disease, this treatment extends the period in which the overall quality of life is still acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giacomo Clarizio
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Lina Raffaella Barzaghi
- Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery Gamma Knife Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Falautano
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery Gamma Knife Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. .,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. .,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. .,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. .,Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Julien C, Hache G, Dulac M, Dubrou C, Castelnovo G, Giordana C, Azulay JP, Fluchère F. The clinical meaning of levodopa equivalent daily dose in Parkinson's disease. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2021; 35:620-630. [PMID: 33458868 DOI: 10.1111/fcp.12646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Levodopa (L-dopa) remains the basis of pharmacological treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, L-dopa therapy is associated with the development of complications and presents major challenges in the long-term treatment. Thus, other medications may be suggested to delay and/or reduce the doses of L-dopa in order to prevent complications. The interpretation of treatment evolution reported in clinical trials on PD may be tricky, especially due to some variability in medications and dose regimens. Some authors have suggested a conversion factor to generate a total L-dopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), calculated as a sum of each parkinsonian medication. Therefore, LEDD provides an artificial summary of the total daily medication a patient is receiving, and to date, there is no report focusing on the clinical interpretation of this parameter. Thus, based on a 3-year, multi-center retrospective study assessing the impact of second-line therapy initiation on LEDD in PD patients, the aim of our article was to discuss LEDD as a quantitative outcome to estimate the impact of second-line therapies on medication regimens; and in the second part of the discussion, to provide a narrative review of the clinical outcomes associated with LEDD in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Julien
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Pharmacie, Marseille, France
| | - Guillaume Hache
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Pharmacie, Marseille, France
| | - Morgane Dulac
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Pharmacie, Marseille, France
| | - Cléa Dubrou
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Pharmacie, Marseille, France
| | - Giovanni Castelnovo
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, Service de Neurologie, Nîmes, France
| | - Caroline Giordana
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Service de Neurologie, Nice, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Azulay
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Neurologie pathologies du mouvement, Centre expert et de coordination interrégional pour la maladie de Parkinson, Marseille, France
| | - Frédérique Fluchère
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Neurologie pathologies du mouvement, Centre expert et de coordination interrégional pour la maladie de Parkinson, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Long term mortality of patients with Parkinson's disease treated with deep brain stimulation in a reference center. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 202:106486. [PMID: 33493881 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder, with a higher risk of death than general population. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been used to treat PD for more than 2 decades, but few studies exist concerning mortality in this subset of patients. Our goal is to analyse mortality in PD patients treated with DBS in our centre. METHODS retrospective evaluation of clinical files of patients with PD who underwent DBS surgery consecutively between October 2002 and May 2019. RESULTS 346 patients were included in the analysis, 60 % male, with a mean age at disease onset of 48± 8 years (18-64), mean age at surgery of 60 ± 7 years (33-75), and mean disease duration until surgery of 14 ± 6 years (3-52). Mean follow-up after surgery was 7 ± 4 years (range 1-17). Overall mortality rate was 17.9 % and mean age at time of death was 71 ± 6 years. The main causes of death were pneumonia, dementia and acute myocardial infarction. In our series, male gender and disease duration until surgery were the only predictors of mortality in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Our study showed a long-term survival higher than previously described, and suggests that the treatment of patients with shorter disease evolution might have a survival benefit. The leading causes of death in PD patients treated with DBS seems unrelated to surgery, as the main causes of death are comparable to non-DBS patients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Management of Parkinson's disease patients after DBS by remote programming: preliminary application of single center during quarantine of 2019-nCoV. J Neurol 2020; 268:1295-1303. [PMID: 33104873 PMCID: PMC7586381 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10273-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). On time follow-up and timely programing of symptoms are important measures to maintain the effectiveness of DBS. Due to the highly contagious nature of 2019-nCoV, patients were quarantined. With the help of Internet technologies, we continued to provide motor and non-motor symptom assessment and remote programming services for postsurgical PD-DBS patients during this extraordinary period. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on postsurgical PD-DBS patients who could not come to our hospital for programming due to the impact of the 2019-nCoV. The differences between the pre- and post-programming groups were analyzed. We designed a 5-level Likert rating scale to evaluate the effects and convenience of the remote programming and Internet self-evaluation procedures. Results Of the 36 patients engaged in the remote programming, 32 patients met the inclusion criteria. Four of the 32 patients set initiated stimulation parameters, and the other 28 patients had significant improvement in UPDRS-III. Nearly all the 28 patients were satisfied with the effect of the remote programming. Most of the patients were willing to use remote programming again. Conclusion Remote programming based on the online evaluation of patient’s symptoms can help improve motor symptoms of postsurgical DBS patients with PD during the quarantine period caused by 2019-nCoV. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10273-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim MS, Ryu HS, Park KW, Choi N, You S, Kim MJ, Kim YJ, Kim J, Kim K, Chung SJ. Age-dependent efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in young- and late-onset Parkinson's disease based on a 10 year follow-up. J Neurol Sci 2020; 416:117004. [PMID: 32622084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-term efficacy and safety of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in patients with young-onset Parkinson's disease (YOPD) and late-onset PD (LOPD) (i.e. motor symptom initial appearance at ages ≤40 and > 40 years, respectively) was compared to identify relationships between PD onset age and the efficacy of DBS. METHODS Statistical analyses compared specific motor and non-motor features among 13 patients with YOPD and 11 with LOPD. Medication reduction patterns and dyskinesia severity scores at baseline and after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of follow-up were also analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA tests. Lastly, a correlation analysis identified relationships between the impact of DBS settings (volume of activated tissue) and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LED), dyskinesia severity scores, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III, and UPDRS part II (disability) scores. RESULTS Ten years after DBS surgery, the reduction of LED from baseline (85.9 ± 592.6 mg versus 623.2 ± 464.9 mg; p = .023) and levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) scores (Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale [UDysRS] parts III items 16-22; 1.6 ± 2.8 versus 5.5 ± 4.1; p = .013) were significantly lower in YOPD patients than LOPD patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding UPDRS part III score improvement in response to levodopa, psychosis occurrence, or adverse effects. CONCLUSION Ten years after STN DBS surgery, LOPD patients showed greater LED reduction, and YOPD patients showed greater LID improvement, although the general long-term outcomes were similar between YOPD and LOPD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Sun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea.
| | - Ho-Sung Ryu
- Department of Neurology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 41944, South Korea
| | - Kye Won Park
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea
| | - Nari Choi
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea
| | - Sooyeoun You
- Department of Neurology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, South Korea
| | - Mi-Jung Kim
- Department of Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, 155-7 Daewangpangyo-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13552, South Korea
| | - Young Jin Kim
- Department of Neurology, Bestheals Hospital, 17, Seonjinan-gil, Sangnok-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Juyeon Kim
- Department of Neurology, Raonheal Hospital, 13, Yanghyeon-ro 405beon-gil, Jungwon-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13439, South Korea
| | - Kiju Kim
- Department of Neurology, Good Light Hospital, Gwangju, 119, Gyeongchung-daero 1926beon-gil, Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Sun Ju Chung
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare long-term survival of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) to matched controls, and examine whether DBS was associated with differences in injurious falls, long-term care, and home care. METHODS Using administrative health data (Ontario, Canada), we examined DBS outcomes within a cohort of individuals diagnosed with PD between 1997 and 2012. Patients receiving DBS were matched with non-DBS controls by age, sex, PD diagnosis date, time with PD, and a propensity score. Survival between groups was compared using the log-rank test and marginal Cox proportional hazards regression. Cumulative incidence function curves and marginal subdistribution hazard models were used to assess effects of DBS on falls, long-term care admission, and home care use, with death as a competing risk. RESULTS There were 260 DBS recipients matched with 551 controls. Patients undergoing DBS did not experience a significant survival advantage compared to controls (log-rank test p = 0.50; HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65-1.22). Among patients <65 years of age, DBS recipients had a significantly reduced risk of death (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.84). Patients receiving DBS were more likely than controls to receive care for falls (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.19-2.05) and home care (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.32-1.90), while long-term care admission was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Receiving DBS may increase survival for younger PD patients who undergo DBS. Future studies should examine whether survival benefits may be attributed to effects on PD or the absence of comorbidities that influence mortality.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ng JH, See AAQ, Xu Z, King NKK. Longitudinal medication profile and cost savings in Parkinson's disease patients after bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. J Neurol 2020; 267:2443-2454. [PMID: 32367298 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09741-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN DBS) has been shown to reduce antiparkinsonian medication in Parkinson's disease. We aimed to investigate the changes in long-term medication profile with STN DBS. METHODS Antiparkinsonian medication data for 56 patients were collected from as early as 3 years before STN DBS up to 10 years after. Cost spending on medication changes was analyzed. Mean levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was projected 10 years into the future based on preoperative data to create a comparator group wherein the patients did not undergo STN DBS. Use of neuroleptics and antidepressants was also recorded. RESULTS LEDD requirement was significantly reduced by a mean of 31 ± 2% over 10 years after DBS, from 1049 ± 381 mg at pre-DBS baseline, to 713 ± 392 mg at 1 year post-DBS, and 712 ± 385 mg at 10 years post-DBS. This was associated with a mean reduction of 35 ± 3% in medicine cost. Modeled LEDD requirements for not having STN DBS were in the range of 1489 mg to 2721 mg at 10 years post-DBS (109-282% higher than the observed mean LEDD in DBS cohort). The proportion of patients increased from 5% before STN DBS to 14% at 10 year post-DBS for neuroleptics, and 11-23% for antidepressants. CONCLUSION STN DBS led to LEDD reduction and antiparkinsonian medication cost savings in our South-East Asian cohort. Medication reduction with STN DBS in our cohort over the 10-year period was comparable to those reported in Western populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077, Singapore
| | - Angela An Qi See
- Department of Neurosurgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore
| | - Zheyu Xu
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore
| | - Nicolas Kon Kam King
- Department of Neurosurgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become an established therapeutic tool for treating patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have troublesome motor fluctuations and dyskinesias refractory to best medical therapy. In addition to its proven efficacy in patients with late PD, the EARLYSTIM trial not only demonstrated the efficacy of DBS in patients with early motor complications but also showed that it did not lose its therapeutic efficacy as the years passed by. However, like all other therapies for PD, DBS is not offered to patients either as a cure for this disease nor is it expected to stop the progression of the neurodegenerative process underlying PD; these important issues need to be highlighted to patients who are considering this therapy. This article aims to provide an introduction to residents or trainees starting a career in movement disorders of the technical aspects of this therapy and the evidence base for its use. For the latter objective, PUBMED was searched from 1946 to 2017 combining the search terms "deep brain stimulation" and "Parkinson's disease" looking for studies demonstrating the efficacy of this therapy in PD. Inclusion criteria included studies that involved more than 20 patients with a physician confirmed diagnosis of PD and a follow-up of greater than or equal to at least 12 months. The findings from those studies on motor symptoms, medication requirements, quality of life, and independence in activities of daily living in PD patients are summarized and presented in tabulated form in this paper at the end.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveed Malek
- Department of Neurology, Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Limousin P, Foltynie T. Long-term outcomes of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 15:234-242. [PMID: 30778210 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-019-0145-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 228] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD) is well established for up to 1 or 2 years, but long-term outcome data are still limited. In this Review, we critically discuss the evidence on the long-term outcomes of DBS and consider the clinical implications. Although many patients are lost to follow-up, the evidence indicates that subthalamic nucleus DBS improves motor function for up to 10 years, although the magnitude of improvement tends to decline over time. Functional scores recorded during on-medication periods worsen more quickly than those recorded in off periods, consistent with the degeneration of non-dopaminergic pathways. Dyskinesia, motor fluctuations and activities of daily living in off periods remain improved at 5 years, but quality-of-life scores have usually fallen below preoperative levels. The incidence and severity of dementia among patients receiving DBS are comparable to those among patients who receive medical treatment. Severe adverse events are rare, but adverse events such as dysarthria are common and probably under-reported. Long-term data on the outcomes of globus pallidus interna DBS are limited and mostly confirm the efficacy for dyskinesia. A trend towards offering DBS in the earlier stages of PD creates a need to identify factors that predict long-term outcomes and to discuss realistic expectations with patients preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Limousin
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. .,National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
| | - Tom Foltynie
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.,National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Muller J, Alizadeh M, Mohamed FB, Riley J, Pearce JJ, Trieu B, Liang TW, Romo V, Sharan A, Wu C. Clinically applicable delineation of the pallidal sensorimotor region in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: study of probabilistic and deterministic tractography. J Neurosurg 2019; 131:1520-1531. [PMID: 30554176 DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.jns18541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective procedure in improving motor symptoms for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) through the use of high-frequency stimulation. Although one of the most commonly used target sites for DBS, sensorimotor regions of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) have yet to be thoroughly described with advanced neuroimaging analysis in vivo for human subjects. Furthermore, many imaging studies to date have been performed in a research setting and bring into question the feasibility of their applications in a clinical setting, such as for surgical planning. This study compares two different tractography methods applied to clinically feasible acquisition sequences in identifying sensorimotor regions of the GPi and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with advanced PD selected to undergo DBS. METHODS Seven patients with refractory PD selected for DBS were examined by MRI. Diffusion images were acquired with an average acquisition time of 15 minutes. Probabilistic and deterministic tractography methods were applied to each diffusion-weighted data set using FSL and MRtrix, respectively. Fiber assignment was performed using combined sensorimotor areas as initiation seeds and the STN and GPi, separately, as inclusion masks. Corticospinal tracts were excluded by setting the cerebral peduncles as exclusion masks. Variability between proposed techniques was shown using center of gravity (CoG) coordinates. RESULTS Deterministic and probabilistic corticopallidal and corticosubthalamic pathways were successfully reconstructed for all subjects across all target sites (bilaterally). Both techniques displayed large connections between the sensorimotor cortex with the posterolateral aspect of the ipsilateral GPi and the posterosuperolateral aspect of the ipsilateral STN. The average variability was 2.67 mm, with the probabilistic method identifying the CoG consistently more posterior and more lateral than the deterministic method. CONCLUSIONS Successful delineation of the sensorimotor regions in both the GPi and STN is achievable within a clinically reasonable timeframe. The techniques described in this paper may enhance presurgical planning with increased accuracy and improvement of patient outcomes in patients undergoing DBS. The variability found between tracking techniques warrants the use of the probabilistic tractography method over the deterministic method for presurgical planning. Probabilistic tractography was found to have an advantage over deterministic tractography in its sensitivity, in accurately describing previously described tracts, and in its ability to detect a larger number of fibers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin Trieu
- 4College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Victor Romo
- 6Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fernandez-Garcia C, Alonso-Frech F, Monje MHG, Matias-Guiu J. Role of deep brain stimulation therapy in the magnetic resonance-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound era: current situation and future prospects. Expert Rev Neurother 2019; 20:7-21. [PMID: 31623494 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1677465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment of movement disorders; but recently there has been an increasing trend toward the ablative procedure magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFU). DBS is an efficient neuromodulatory technique but associated with surgical complications. MRIgFUS is an incision-free method that allows thermal lesioning, with fewer surgical complications but irreversible effects.Areas covered: We look at current and prospective aspects of both techniques. In DBS, appropriate patient selection, improvement in surgical expertise, target accuracy (preoperative and intraoperative imaging), neurophysiological recordings, and novel segmented leads need to be considered. However, increased number of older patients with higher comorbidities and risk of DBS complications (mainly intracranial hemorrhage, but also infections, hardware complications) make them not eligible for surgery. With MRgFUS, hemorrhage risks are virtually nonexistent, infection or hardware malfunction are eliminated, while irreversible side effects can appear.Expert commentary: Comparison of the efficacy and risks associated with these techniques, in combination with a growing aged population in developed countries with higher comorbidities and a preference for less invasive treatments, necessitates a review of the indications for movement disorders and the most appropriate treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fernandez-Garcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Research Health Institute (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.,Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Alonso-Frech
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Research Health Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.,HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, Universidad CEU-San Pablo, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - M H G Monje
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, Universidad CEU-San Pablo, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Matias-Guiu
- Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Research Health Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Towards unambiguous reporting of complications related to deep brain stimulation surgery: A retrospective single-center analysis and systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198529. [PMID: 30071021 PMCID: PMC6071984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and objective To determine rates of adverse events (AEs) related to deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery or implanted devices from a large series from a single institution. Sound comparisons with the literature require the definition of unambiguous categories, since there is no consensus on the reporting of such AEs. Patients and methods 123 consecutive patients (median age 63 yrs; female 45.5%) treated with DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (78 patients), ventrolateral thalamus (24), internal pallidum (20), and centre médian-parafascicular nucleus (1) were analyzed retrospectively. Both mean and median follow-up time was 4.7 years (578 patient-years). AEs were assessed according to three unambiguous categories: (i) hemorrhages including other intracranial complications because these might lead to neurological deficits or death, (ii) infections and similar AEs necessitating the explantation of hardware components as this results in the interruption of DBS therapy, and (iii) lead revisions for various reasons since this involves an additional intracranial procedure. For a systematic review of the literature AE rates were calculated based on primary data presented in 103 publications. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with the I2 statistic and analyzed further by a random effects meta-regression. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plots. Results Surgery- or hardware-related AEs (23) affected 18 of 123 patients (14.6%) and resolved without permanent sequelae in all instances. In 2 patients (1.6%), small hemorrhages in the striatum were associated with transient neurological deficits. In 4 patients (3.3%; 0.7% per patient-year) impulse generators were removed due to infection. In 2 patients electrodes were revised (1.6%; 0.3% per patient-year). There was no lead migration or surgical revision because of lead misplacement. Age was not statistically significant different (p>0.05) between patients affected by AEs or not. AE rates did not decline over time and similar incidences were found among all patients (423) implanted with DBS systems at our institution until December 2016. A systematic literature review revealed that exact AE rates could not be determined from many studies, which could not be attributed to study designs. Average rates for intracranial complications were 3.8% among studies (per-study analysis) and 3.4% for pooled analysis of patients from different studies (per-patient analysis). Annual hardware removal rates were 3.6 and 2.4% for per-study and per-patient analysis, respectively, and lead revision rates were 4.1 and 2.6%, respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 ranged between 77% and 91% for the three categories; p< 0.0001). For hardware removal heterogeneity (I2 = 87.4%) was reduced by taking study size (p< 0.0001) and publication year (p< 0.01) into account, although a significant degree of heterogeneity remained (I2 = 80.0%; p< 0.0001). Based on comparisons with health care-related databases there appears to be publication bias with lower rates for hardware-related AEs in published patient cohorts. Conclusions The proposed categories are suited for an unequivocal assessment of AEs even in a retrospective manner and useful for benchmarking. AE rates in the present cohorts from our institution compare favorable with the literature.
Collapse
|
25
|
Rahmani M, Benabdeljlil M, Bellakhdar F, Faris MEA, Jiddane M, Bayad KE, Boutbib F, Razine R, Gana R, Hassani MRE, Fatemi NE, Fikri M, Sanhaji S, Tassine H, Balrhiti IEA, Hadri SE, Kettani NEC, Abbadi NE, Amor M, Moussaoui A, Semlali A, Aidi S, Benhaddou EHA, Benomar A, Bouhouche A, Yahyaoui M, Khamlichi AE, Ouahabi AE, Maaqili RE, Tibar H, Arkha Y, Melhaoui A, Benazzouz A, Regragui W. Deep Brain Stimulation in Moroccan Patients With Parkinson's Disease: The Experience of Neurology Department of Rabat. Front Neurol 2018; 9:532. [PMID: 30108543 PMCID: PMC6080137 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is known as a therapy of choice of advanced Parkinson's disease. The present study aimed to assess the beneficial and side effects of STN DBS in Moroccan Parkinsonian patients. Material and Methods: Thirty five patients underwent bilateral STN DBS from 2008 to 2016 in the Rabat University Hospital. Patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up for 6 to 12 months using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in four conditions (stimulation OFF and ON and medication OFF and ON), the levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), dyskinesia and fluctuation scores and PDQ39 scale for quality of life (QOL). Postoperative side effects were also recorded. Results: The mean age at disease onset was 42.31 ± 7.29 years [28-58] and the mean age at surgery was 54.66 ± 8.51 years [34-70]. The median disease duration was 11.95 ± 4.28 years [5-22]. Sixty-three percentage of patients were male. 11.4% of patients were tremor dominant while 45.71 showed akinetic-rigid form and 42.90 were classified as mixed phenotype. The LEDD before surgery was 1200 mg/day [800-1500]. All patients had motor fluctuations whereas non-motor fluctuations were present in 61.80% of cases. STN DBS decreased the LEDD by 51.72%, as the mean LEDD post-surgery was 450 [188-800]. The UPDRS-III was improved by 52.27%, dyskinesia score by 66.70% and motor fluctuations by 50%, whereas QOL improved by 27.12%. Post-operative side effects were hypophonia (2 cases), infection (3 cases), and pneumocephalus (2 cases). Conclusion: Our results showed that STN DBS is an effective treatment in Moroccan Parkinsonian patients leading to a major improvement of the most disabling symptoms (dyskinesia, motor fluctuation) and a better QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mounia Rahmani
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology A and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Maria Benabdeljlil
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology A and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Fouad Bellakhdar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital Ibn Sina, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Mustapha El Alaoui Faris
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology A and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Mohamed Jiddane
- Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Khalil El Bayad
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology B and Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Fatima Boutbib
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology A and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Rachid Razine
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Rachid Gana
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital Ibn Sina, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Moulay R El Hassani
- Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Nizar El Fatemi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital Ibn Sina, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Meryem Fikri
- Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Siham Sanhaji
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology A and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Hennou Tassine
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology B and Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Imane El Alaoui Balrhiti
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology A and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Souad El Hadri
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology A and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Najwa Ech-Cherif Kettani
- Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Najia El Abbadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital Ibn Sina, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Mourad Amor
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Abdelmjid Moussaoui
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Afifa Semlali
- Department of Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital Ibn Sina, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Saadia Aidi
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology A and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - El Hachmia Ait Benhaddou
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology B and Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Ali Benomar
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology B and Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Ahmed Bouhouche
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology B and Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Mohamed Yahyaoui
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology B and Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Abdeslam El Khamlichi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Centre de Rehabilitation et de Neurosciences, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Abdessamad El Ouahabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Centre de Rehabilitation et de Neurosciences, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Rachid El Maaqili
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital Ibn Sina, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Houyam Tibar
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology B and Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Yasser Arkha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Centre de Rehabilitation et de Neurosciences, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Adyl Melhaoui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Centre de Rehabilitation et de Neurosciences, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Abdelhamid Benazzouz
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, Univ. de Bordeaux UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Wafa Regragui
- Research Team in Neurology and Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology B and Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hôpital des Spécialités ONO, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Polanski WH, Martin KD, Günther S, Schackert G, Klingelhoefer L, Fauser M, Storch A, Sobottka SB. Application of the Six Sigma concept for quality assessment of different strategies in DBS surgery†. Int J Qual Health Care 2018; 30:760-768. [DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Witold H Polanski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, Germany
| | - K Daniel Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, Germany
| | - Swen Günther
- Faculty of Business Administration, University of applied Science HTW Dresden, Friedrich-List-Platz 1, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gabriele Schackert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lisa Klingelhoefer
- Division of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Department of Neurology, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mareike Fauser
- Division of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Department of Neurology, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Storch
- Division of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Department of Neurology, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Stephan B Sobottka
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang D, Liu X, Zhou B, Kuang W, Guo T. Advanced research on deep brain stimulation in treating mental disorders. Exp Ther Med 2017; 15:3-12. [PMID: 29250146 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.5366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is a method that involves using an electric stimulus on a specific target in the brain with stereotaxis. It is a minimally invasive, safe, adjustable and reversible nerve involvement technology. At present, this technique is widely applied to treat movement disorders and has produced promising effects on mental symptoms, including combined anxiety and depression. Deep brain stimulation has therefore been employed as a novel treatment for depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, habituation, Tourette's syndrome, presenile dementia, anorexia nervosa and other refractory mental illnesses. Many encouraging results have been reported. The aim of the present review was to briefly describe the mechanisms, target selection, side effects, ethical arguments and risks associated with deep brain stimulation. Although deep brain stimulation is a developing and promising treatment, a large amount of research is still required to determine its curative effect, and the selection of patients and targets must be subjected to strict ethical standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongxin Wang
- Mental Health Institute of Hunan Province, The Brain Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan 410007, P.R. China
| | - Xuejun Liu
- Mental Health Institute of Hunan Province, The Brain Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan 410007, P.R. China
| | - Bin Zhou
- Surgery Department of Mental Disease, The Brain Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan 410007, P.R. China
| | - Weiping Kuang
- Surgery Department of Mental Disease, The Brain Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan 410007, P.R. China
| | - Tiansheng Guo
- Mental Health Institute of Hunan Province, The Brain Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan 410007, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jitkritsadakul O, Bhidayasiri R, Kalia SK, Hodaie M, Lozano AM, Fasano A. Systematic review of hardware-related complications of Deep Brain Stimulation: Do new indications pose an increased risk? Brain Stimul 2017; 10:967-976. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
29
|
Zhang J, Wang T, Zhang CC, Zeljic K, Zhan S, Sun BM, Li DY. The safety issues and hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation therapy: a single-center retrospective analysis of 478 patients with Parkinson's disease. Clin Interv Aging 2017; 12:923-928. [PMID: 28652714 PMCID: PMC5472429 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s130882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established therapy for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) in patients experiencing motor fluctuations and medication-refractory tremor. Despite the relative tolerability and safety of this procedure, associated complications and unnatural deaths are still unavoidable. METHODS In this study, hardware-related complications and the causes of unnatural death were retrospectively analyzed in 478 patients with PD who were treated with DBS. RESULTS The results showed a 3-year survival rate of 98.6% and a 5-year survival rate of 96.4% for patients with PD who underwent DBS treatment at the study center. Pneumonia was the cause of death with the highest frequency. Prophylactic antibiotics and steroids or antihistamine drugs were adopted to reduce the risk of infection. Twenty-two patients (4.6%) experienced hardware-related complications. CONCLUSION Deaths of PD patients who receive DBS are typically unrelated to the disease itself or complications associated with the surgery. Pneumonia, malignant tumors, asphyxia, and multiple-organ failure are the common causes of death. Swallowing-related problems may be the most important clinical symptom in late-stage PD, as they cannot be stabilized or improved by DBS alone, and are potentially lethal. Although prophylactic antibiotics and steroids or antihistamine drugs may reduce the risk of infection, it is imperative to identify high-risk patients for whom a therapeutic approach not requiring an implantable device is more suitable, for example, pallidotomy and potentially transcranial ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zhang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Chen-Cheng Zhang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Kristina Zeljic
- Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Shikun Zhan
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Bo-Min Sun
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Dian-You Li
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Faggiani E, Benazzouz A. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease: From history to the interaction with the monoaminergic systems. Prog Neurobiol 2017; 151:139-156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
31
|
Cossu G, Pau M. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation and gait in Parkinson's Disease: a not always fruitful relationship. Gait Posture 2017; 52:205-210. [PMID: 27915226 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2016] [Revised: 11/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) provides efficient treatment for the alleviation of motor signs in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but its specific effects on gait is sometimes less successful as it may even lead to an aggravation of freezing of gait. To better understand when axial symptoms can be expected to improve and when they may worsen or be resistant to STN-DBS, we propose here a narrative review that considers the recent literature evidences based on instrumental gait analysis data. Our aim is to report about the efficacy of STN-DBS on PD gait, analyzing the clinical and procedural factors involved, and discussing the strategies for optimizing such effectiveness in patients with advanced PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Cossu
- "G. Brotzu" General Hospital, Department of Neurology, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Pau
- Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Krack P, Martinez-Fernandez R, del Alamo M, Obeso JA. Current applications and limitations of surgical treatments for movement disorders. Mov Disord 2017; 32:36-52. [DOI: 10.1002/mds.26890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Krack
- Neurology Division, Department of Clinical Neurosciences; University Hospital of Geneva; Geneva Switzerland
| | | | - Marta del Alamo
- CINAC-Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur; CEU-San Pablo University; Madrid Spain
- Neurosurgery Department; Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal; Madrid Spain
| | - Jose A. Obeso
- CINAC-Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur; CEU-San Pablo University; Madrid Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas; Madrid Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Improvement of Advanced Parkinson's Disease Manifestations with Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus: A Single Institution Experience. Brain Sci 2016; 6:brainsci6040058. [PMID: 27983589 PMCID: PMC5187572 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci6040058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Revised: 12/03/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We present our experience at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) in deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), describing our surgical technique, and reporting our clinical results, and morbidities. Twenty patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) who underwent bilateral STN-DBS were studied. Patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up for one year using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in “on” and “off” medication and “on” and “off” stimulation conditions. At one-year follow-up, we calculated significant improvement in all the motor aspects of PD (UPDRS III) and in activities of daily living (UPDRS II) in the “off” medication state. The “off” medication UPDRS improved by 49.3%, tremors improved by 81.6%, rigidity improved by 50.0%, and bradykinesia improved by 39.3%. The “off” medication UPDRS II scores improved by 73.8%. The Levodopa equivalent daily dose was reduced by 54.1%. The UPDRS IVa score (dyskinesia) was reduced by 65.1%. The UPDRS IVb score (motor fluctuation) was reduced by 48.6%. Deep brain stimulation of the STN improves the cardinal motor manifestations of the idiopathic PD. It also improves activities of daily living, and reduces medication-induced complications.
Collapse
|
34
|
Mortality of advanced Parkinson's disease patients treated with deep brain stimulation surgery. J Neurol Sci 2016; 369:230-235. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Revised: 07/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
35
|
Fundament T, Eldridge PR, Green AL, Whone AL, Taylor RS, Williams AC, Schuepbach WMM. Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease with Early Motor Complications: A UK Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0159340. [PMID: 27441637 PMCID: PMC4956248 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parkinson's disease (PD) is a debilitating illness associated with considerable impairment of quality of life and substantial costs to health care systems. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established surgical treatment option for some patients with advanced PD. The EARLYSTIM trial has recently demonstrated its clinical benefit also in patients with early motor complications. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DBS, compared to best medical therapy (BMT), among PD patients with early onset of motor complications, from a United Kingdom (UK) payer perspective. METHODS We developed a Markov model to represent the progression of PD as rated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) over time in patients with early PD. Evidence sources were a systematic review of clinical evidence; data from the EARLYSTIM study; and a UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) dataset including DBS patients. A mapping algorithm was developed to generate utility values based on UPDRS data for each intervention. The cost-effectiveness was expressed as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore the effect of parameter uncertainty. RESULTS Over a 15-year time horizon, DBS was predicted to lead to additional mean cost per patient of £26,799 compared with BMT (£73,077/patient versus £46,278/patient) and an additional mean 1.35 QALYs (6.69 QALYs versus 5.35 QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £19,887 per QALY gained with a 99% probability of DBS being cost-effective at a threshold of £30,000/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses suggested that the results were not significantly impacted by plausible changes in the input parameter values. CONCLUSION These results indicate that DBS is a cost-effective intervention in PD patients with early motor complications when compared with existing interventions, offering additional health benefits at acceptable incremental cost. This supports the extended use of DBS among patients with early onset of motor complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul R. Eldridge
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust and Liverpool University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander L. Green
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alan L. Whone
- Bristol Brain Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rod S. Taylor
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian C. Williams
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - W. M. Michael Schuepbach
- Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre d’Investigation Clinique 9503, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Département de Neurologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie–Paris 6 et INSERM, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jiang LL, Liu JL, Fu XL, Xian WB, Gu J, Liu YM, Ye J, Chen J, Qian H, Xu SH, Pei Z, Chen L. Long-term Efficacy of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A 5-year Follow-up Study in China. Chin Med J (Engl) 2016; 128:2433-8. [PMID: 26365958 PMCID: PMC4725566 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.164925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is effective against advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), allowing dramatic improvement of Parkinsonism, in addition to a significant reduction in medication. Here we aimed to investigate the long-term effect of STN DBS in Chinese PD patients, which has not been thoroughly studied in China. Methods: Ten PD patients were assessed before DBS and followed up 1, 3, and 5 years later using Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS III), Parkinson's Disease Questionnatire-39, Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-Chinese Version, Mini-mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression Scale. Stimulation parameters and drug dosages were recorded at each follow-up. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA for repeated measures. Results: In the “off” state (off medication), DBS improved UPDRS III scores by 35.87% in 5 years, compared with preoperative baseline (P < 0.001). In the “on” state (on medication), motor scores at 5 years were similar to the results of preoperative levodopa challenge test. The quality of life is improved by 58.18% (P < 0.001) from baseline to 3 years and gradually declined afterward. Sleep, cognition, and emotion were mostly unchanged. Levodopa equivalent daily dose was reduced from 660.4 ± 210.1 mg at baseline to 310.6 ± 158.4 mg at 5 years (by 52.96%, P < 0.001). The average pulse width, frequency and amplitude at 5 years were 75.0 ± 18.21 μs, 138.5 ± 19.34 Hz, and 2.68 ± 0.43 V, respectively. Conclusions: STN DBS is an effective intervention for PD, although associated with a slightly diminished efficacy after 5 years. Compared with other studies, patients in our study required lower voltage and medication for satisfactory symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ling Chen
- Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases, National Key Clinical Department, National Key Discipline, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
All-on-4 concept implantation for mandibular rehabilitation of an edentulous patient with Parkinson disease: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114:745-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Revised: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
38
|
Blumenfeld Z, Brontë-Stewart H. High Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation and Neural Rhythms in Parkinson's Disease. Neuropsychol Rev 2015; 25:384-97. [PMID: 26608605 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-015-9308-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
High frequency (HF) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). It effectively treats the cardinal motor signs of PD, including tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity. The most common neural target is the subthalamic nucleus, located within the basal ganglia, the region most acutely affected by PD pathology. Using chronically-implanted DBS electrodes, researchers have been able to record underlying neural rhythms from several nodes in the PD network as well as perturb it using DBS to measure the ensuing neural and behavioral effects, both acutely and over time. In this review, we provide an overview of the PD neural network, focusing on the pathophysiological signals that have been recorded from PD patients as well as the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic benefits of HF DBS. We then discuss evidence for the relationship between specific neural oscillations and symptoms of PD, including the aberrant relationships potentially underlying functional connectivity in PD as well as the use of different frequencies of stimulation to more specifically target certain symptoms. Finally, we briefly describe several current areas of investigation and how the ability to record neural data in ecologically-valid settings may allow researchers to explore the relationship between brain and behavior in an unprecedented manner, culminating in the future automation of neurostimulation therapy for the treatment of a variety of neuropsychiatric diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zack Blumenfeld
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Helen Brontë-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Rm A343, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Liang J, Hu X, Zhou X, Jiang X, Cao Y, Wang L, Jin A, Liu J. Five-year follow-up of 23 asymmetrical Parkinson's disease patients treated with unilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Neural Regen Res 2015; 7:1428-35. [PMID: 25657677 PMCID: PMC4308795 DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.18.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2012] [Accepted: 04/23/2012] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, 23 asymmetrical Parkinson's disease patients were treated with unilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and followed up for 5 years. At 5 years after stimulation treatment, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale II, III and axial symptom scores in the off-drug condition were significantly increased compared those at baseline. However, total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale II, III and axial symptom scores were significantly lower with stimulation-on compared with the synchronous stimulation-off state in off-drug condition, and the motor symptoms of contralateral side limbs were effectively controlled. Only low Hoehn-Yahr stage was correlated with good long-term postoperative improvement in motor symptoms. The mean levodopa-equivalent daily dose after stimulation treatment was significantly lower than that before treatment, but dyskinesias became worse. Our experimental findings indicate that unilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for improving motor symptoms in well selected asymmetrical Parkinson's disease patients presenting no severe axial symptoms and dyskinesias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinchuan Liang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Xiaowu Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Xiaoping Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Xiufeng Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Yiqun Cao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Laixing Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Aiguo Jin
- Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Jianmin Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Umemura A, Miyata M, Oka Y, Okita K, Oyama G, Shimo Y, Hattori N. Five-Year Outcomes of Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Japanese Patients with Parkinson’s Disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.4236/apd.2015.42004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
41
|
Nabli F, Ben Sassi S, Amouri R, Duda JE, Farrer MJ, Hentati F. Motor phenotype of LRRK2-associated Parkinson's disease: A tunisian longitudinal study. Mov Disord 2014; 30:253-8. [DOI: 10.1002/mds.26097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2013] [Revised: 08/23/2014] [Accepted: 09/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Nabli
- Neurology Department; National Institute Mongi Ben Hmida of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar; Tunis Tunisia
| | - Samia Ben Sassi
- Neurology Department; National Institute Mongi Ben Hmida of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar; Tunis Tunisia
| | - Rim Amouri
- Neurology Department; National Institute Mongi Ben Hmida of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar; Tunis Tunisia
| | - John E. Duda
- Parkinson's Disease Research; Education and Clinical Center, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Philadelphia PA USA
| | - Matthew J. Farrer
- Djavad Mowafhaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia; Vancouver Canada
| | - Fayçal Hentati
- Neurology Department; National Institute Mongi Ben Hmida of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar; Tunis Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
[Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: timing and patient selection]. DER NERVENARZT 2014; 85:137-46. [PMID: 24463646 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-013-3876-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective and evidence-based treatment option for Parkinson's disease. Studies have shown that DBS has good and long-term effects on motor function and quality of life for patients in an advanced stage of the disease and that it is more effective than medical therapy alone. Moreover, a favorable effect of DBS could also be detected at an earlier stage of the disease. On the other hand, possible risks and side effects of the procedure need to be taken into consideration. These can manifest as procedure-related complications, such as bleeding and infections in addition to stimulation-associated phenomena, such as neuropsychiatric disorders and motor side effects. Despite the good effects of DBS important issues still need to be addressed which will be discussed in this article considering the results of several new randomized and controlled clinical studies. For patients with Parkinson's disease with early fluctuations and dyskinesia, DBS has been found to be superior to the best pharmaceutical treatment; therefore, DBS can be considered as a treatment option in the earlier course of the disease. The diagnostic evaluation and the exclusion of contraindications are crucial for patient selection. The choice of the target should be based on the individual symptoms in patients although the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can be considered the standard target. In every case an individual assessment of chances and risks must be conducted and realistic goals and reasonable expectations must be defined.
Collapse
|
43
|
Fluchere F, Witjas T, Eusebio A, Bruder N, Giorgi R, Leveque M, Peragut JC, Azulay JP, Regis J. Controlled general anaesthesia for subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85:1167-73. [PMID: 24249783 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the short-term (1 year) and long-term (5 years) outcome of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation operated upon under controlled general anaesthesia (GA). METHODS 213 consecutive patients with PD were included between January 2000 and March 2009 and operated upon under a particular type of GA with close control of the level of sedation allowing intraoperative recordings. 188 patients were assessed 1 year postoperatively. 65 patients also completed the long-term observation period and were evaluated 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS The Unified PD Rating Scale III score in the 'Off drug--On stim' condition was improved at 1 year and 5 years by 61% and 37%, respectively, (p<0.001). Motor complications decreased at short-term and long-term by 68% and 65%, respectively, for dyskinesia and by 52% and 48%, respectively, for fluctuations, (p<0.001). Dopaminergic treatment could also be reduced at short-term and long-term by 46% and 49%, respectively (p<0.001). There was no significant modification of mood and cognition assessments (Mattis scale and Beck depression inventory) at 1 year and 5 years. Concerning the main adverse events related to the surgery, we report four haematomas (1.9%) with two deaths (0.9%), eight cases of transient confusion (3.7%) and no epileptic seizure. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm that STN stimulation performed under controlled GA is efficient and has similar short-term and long-term motor effects than intervention under local anaesthesia. Furthermore, this specific procedure is not associated with more adverse events. The success of such an intervention requires strict anaesthetic monitoring and accurate STN identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Fluchere
- Department of Neurology and Movement Disorders, APHM, La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences cliniques, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France
| | - T Witjas
- Department of Neurology and Movement Disorders, APHM, La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences cliniques, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Marseille, Cedex, France
| | - A Eusebio
- Department of Neurology and Movement Disorders, APHM, La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences cliniques, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Marseille, Cedex, France
| | - N Bruder
- Department of Anesthesiology, APHM, La Timone, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France
| | - R Giorgi
- Service de Santé Publique et d'Information Médicale and LERTIM, APHM, La Timone, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France
| | - M Leveque
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, APHM, La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences cliniques, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France
| | - J-C Peragut
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, APHM, La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences cliniques, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France
| | - J-P Azulay
- Department of Neurology and Movement Disorders, APHM, La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences cliniques, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Marseille, Cedex, France
| | - J Regis
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, APHM, La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences cliniques, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Merola A, Rizzi L, Zibetti M, Artusi CA, Montanaro E, Angrisano S, Lanotte M, Rizzone MG, Lopiano L. Medical therapy and subthalamic deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease: a different long-term outcome? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85:552-9. [PMID: 23847290 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Few clinical trials reported the comparative short-term efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) versus medical therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the comparative efficacy, safety and the potential disease-modifying effect of these treatments have not been investigated over a longer follow-up period. METHODS In this study, we organised a 'retrospective control group' to compare medical and surgical therapies over a long-term period. We assessed a group of PD patients suitable for STN-DBS but successively treated with medical therapies for reasons not related to PD, and a group of similar consecutive STN-DBS patients. We thus obtained two groups comparable at baseline, which were re-evaluated after an average follow-up of 6 years (range 4-11). RESULTS Patients treated with STN-DBS showed a long-lasting superior clinical efficacy on motor fluctuations, with a significant reduction in the average percentage of the waking day spent in 'OFF' and in the duration and disability of dyskinesia. Moreover, operated patients showed a better outcome in the activities of daily living in 'Medication-OFF' condition. On the other hand, a similar progression of motor score and cognitive/behavioural alterations was observed between the two groups, apart from phonemic verbal fluency, which significantly worsened in STN-DBS patients. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first long-term comparison between medical and surgical therapies; a superior efficacy of STN-DBS was observed on motor disability, while no significant differences were observed in the progression of motor symptoms and, apart from phonemic verbal fluency, of neuropsychological alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristide Merola
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Torino, , Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bloch J, Brunet JF, McEntire CRS, Redmond DE. Primate adult brain cell autotransplantation produces behavioral and biological recovery in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced parkinsonian St. Kitts monkeys. J Comp Neurol 2014; 522:2729-40. [PMID: 24610674 DOI: 10.1002/cne.23579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2013] [Revised: 10/25/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The potential for "replacement cells" to restore function in Parkinson's disease has been widely reported over the past 3 decades, rejuvenating the central nervous system rather than just relieving symptoms. Most such experiments have used fetal or embryonic sources that may induce immunological rejection and generate ethical concerns. Autologous sources, in which the cells to be implanted are derived from recipients' own cells after reprogramming to stem cells, direct genetic modifications, or epigenetic modifications in culture, could eliminate many of these problems. In a previous study on autologous brain cell transplantation, we demonstrated that adult monkey brain cells, obtained from cortical biopsies and kept in culture for 7 weeks, exhibited potential as a method of brain repair after low doses of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) caused dopaminergic cell death. The present study exposed monkeys to higher MPTP doses to produce significant parkinsonism and behavioral impairments. Cerebral cortical cells were biopsied from the animals, held in culture for 7 weeks to create an autologous neural cell "ecosystem" and reimplanted bilaterally into the striatum of the same six donor monkeys. These cells expressed neuroectodermal and progenitor markers such as nestin, doublecortin, GFAP, neurofilament, and vimentin. Five to six months after reimplantation, histological analysis with the dye PKH67 and unbiased stereology showed that reimplanted cells survived, migrated bilaterally throughout the striatum, and seemed to exert a neurorestorative effect. More tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive neurons and significant behavioral improvement followed reimplantation of cultured autologous neural cells as a result of unknown trophic factors released by the grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyne Bloch
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Long-term mortality analysis in Parkinson's disease treated with deep brain stimulation. PARKINSONS DISEASE 2014; 2014:717041. [PMID: 24772365 PMCID: PMC3960527 DOI: 10.1155/2014/717041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2013] [Revised: 01/25/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background. Few data have been published regarding long-term mortality in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with DBS. Methods. This study analyzed long-term mortality rates, causes, and correlates in PD patients treated with DBS. Results. 184 consecutive patients were included; mean follow-up was 50 months. Fifteen deaths occurred (total 8.15%, annual mortality rate 1.94%). Mean age at disease onset and at surgery was 48 ± 2.4 and 63 ± 1.6 years, respectively. Mean disease duration until death was 21 ± 7.8 years. Most deaths related to stroke, myocardial infarction, other vascular/heart disorders, or severe infection; one suicide was recorded. Deceased PD patients were mostly male and had lower motor benefit after DBS, but univariate analysis failed to show significant differences regarding gender and motor benefit. Survival was 99% and 94% at 3 and 5 years. Conclusions. Long-term survival is to be expected in PD patients treated with DBS, possibly higher than previously expected. Death usually supervenes due to vascular events or infection.
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Subthalamic neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease with early fluctuations: balancing the risks and benefits. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12:1025-34. [PMID: 24050735 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70151-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an established treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease with pharmacologically unresponsive fluctuations. Compared with pharmacological treatment, subthalamic neurostimulation significantly improves motor symptoms, particularly during the phases of poor response to drug treatment, and reduces the severity of dyskinesias. Importantly, it also significantly improves quality of life and other integral measures of disease severity. The treatment response can last for more than 10 years, although there is no evidence that levodopa-resistant symptoms are delayed by subthalamic neurostimulation. At present, the mean disease duration for patients at the time of implantation is 12 years. In a recent study (EARLYSTIM) in patients with a disease duration of 7·5 years and fluctuations for 1·5 years, similar improvements in clinical outcomes were reported. These findings suggest that neurostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus could be used earlier in the disease course for carefully selected patients if the benefits of the treatment are weighed against the surgical risks and the lifelong need for specialised care by an experienced team. As mobility is consistently improved during the times with poor mobility by reducing fluctuations and delaying levodopa-sensitive complications, we propose that this treatment changes the disease course.
Collapse
|
49
|
Kim HY, Chang WS, Kang DW, Sohn YH, Lee MS, Chang JW. Factors related to outcomes of subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013; 54:118-24. [PMID: 24175026 PMCID: PMC3809437 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2013.54.2.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2012] [Revised: 05/22/2013] [Accepted: 08/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment of choice for patients with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) who have motor complication with medication. The objectives of this study are to analyze long-term follow-up data of STN DBS cases and to identify the factors related to outcomes. METHODS Fifty-two PD patients who underwent STN DBS were followed-up for more than 3 years. The Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and other clinical profiles were assessed preoperatively and during follow-up. A linear regression model was used to analyze whether factors predict the results of STN DBS. We divided the study individuals into subgroups according to several factors and compared subgroups. RESULTS Preoperative activity of daily living (ADL) and the magnitude of preoperative levodopa response were shown to predict the improvement in UPDRS part II without medication, and preoperative ADL and levodopa equivalent dose (LED) were shown to predict the improvement in UPDRS part II with medication. In UPDRS part III with medication, the magnitude of preoperative levodopa response was a predicting factor. CONCLUSION The intensity of preoperative levodopa response was a strong factor for motor outcome. And preoperative ADL and LED were strong factors for ADL improvement. More vigorous studies should be conducted to elucidate how levodopa-induced motor complications are ameliorated after STN DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae Yu Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ; Department of Neurosurgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kasasbeh A, Abulseoud OA, Matsumoto JY, Stead SM, Goerss SJ, Klassen BT, Huston J, Min HK, Lee KH, Frye MA. Lack of differential motor outcome with subthalamic nucleus region stimulation in Parkinson's disease. J Clin Neurosci 2013; 20:1520-6. [PMID: 23906524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2013] [Accepted: 02/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a viable therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). The impact of subthalamic nucleus (STN) lead placement (lateral versus medial) on motor outcome, however, has not been systematically evaluated. Forty-eight patients with PD underwent STN-DBS surgery and were evaluated postoperatively for 48 weeks for motor improvement as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (standardized motor examination) and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). Postoperative MRI was used to identify the location of the active stimulating contact and motor outcome was analyzed. STN-DBS was associated with significant improvement in motor outcome as determined by a reduction in the UPDRS part III subscore from 34.44 ± 1.29 at baseline to 18.76 ± 1.06 at end visit (p<0.0001) and a reduction in LEDD from 1721 ± 152 mg/day at baseline to 1134 ± 119 mg/day at end visit (p=0.0024). Patients with stimulating contacts in the medial STN compared to the lateral STN did not demonstrate any significant differences in motor outcome (UPDRS, p=0.5811; LEDD, p=0.7341). No significant differences were found in motor outcome between patients with STN stimulation compared to stimulation of surrounding fiber tracts (p=0.80). No significant difference in stimulation voltage was noted with respect to lead location. Our study did not find a significant effect for the location of active contact and motor outcome neither within the subregions of the STN nor between the STN and surrounding fibers. Further research is needed to better understand the neurophysiological basis for these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimen Kasasbeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|