Low adherence to antidepressants is associated with increased mortality in Parkinson disease patients

Depression After Parkinson's Disease: Treated Differently or Not At All?

Depression is a common, potentially debilitating non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease which may manifest at any time and can respond to treatment. Although depression is a known primary mediator of health-related quality of life, it is currently unknown whether the timing of depression diagnosis relative to PD diagnosis affects receipt of depression treatment. Electronic health record data were examined to explore differences in depression treatment among patients diagnosed with depression before or after PD diagnosis. Compared to PD patients diagnosed with depression prior to PD, those diagnosed with depression following PD are less likely to receive any treatment, either pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic, indicating a temporal association between the time of PD diagnosis and receipt of depression treatment. This highlights a potentially substantial treatment gap, despite the existence of efficacious treatment. Diagnosis with PD appears to alter depression treatment and further research is warranted to determine potential causes and effective interventions.

Association between antidepressants, benzodiazepine and all-cause mortality in elderly hip fracture: A Korean nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between the preoperative and postoperative use of antidepressant and benzodiazepine and all-cause mortality in elderly hip fracture patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical treatment for hip fracture over 65 years old were classified into Past-user, Current-user, and Non-users for each period according to use history for antidepressants or benzodiazepines. And, for the subgroup analysis, patients were classified by presence of past history for psychiatric medication. A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the effects of antidepressants and benzodiazepines on all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 15,576 patients were included in this study. Past users of antidepressants and benzodiazepines were 5699 (36.59%) patients and 11,319 (72.67%) patients, respectively. Current users of antidepressants and benzodiazepines were 2888 (18.54%) patients and 6287 (40.36%) patients, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the adjusted hazard for death compared to the non-users for both the past and the current users (p > 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, there were 12,502 once-users and 3074 never-users according to psychiatric medication. Current uses of antidepressants and benzodiazepine in the once-user did not increase adjusted hazard for death compared to the non-users (p>0.05). However, current uses of antidepressants by never-users increased the adjusted hazard for death compared to the non-user (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08-1.59; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

No association was observed between the uses of antidepressants and benzodiazepines after hip fracture and mortality risk in elderly patients who received psychiatric medication before hip fracture. However, the use of these medications was associated with increased all-cause mortality risk in patients who had no history of psychiatric medication before hip fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Examining the Use of Antidepressants for Adolescents with Depression/Anxiety Who Regularly Use Cannabis: A Narrative Review

Depression and anxiety disorders are two of the most common and growing mental health concerns in adolescents. Consequently, antidepressant medication (AD) use has increased widely during the last decades. Several classes of antidepressants are used mainly to treat depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorders by targeting relevant brain neurochemical pathways. Almost all randomized clinical trials of antidepressants examined patients with no concomitant medications or drugs. This does not address the expected course of therapy and outcome in cannabis users. Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit substance globally. Substantial changes in its regulation are recently taking place. Many countries and US states are becoming more permissive towards its medical and recreational use. The psychological and physiological effects of cannabis (mainly of its major components, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD)) have been extensively characterized. Cannabis use can be a risk factor for depressive and anxiety symptoms, but some constituents or mixtures may have antidepressant and/or anxiolytic potential. The aim of this literature review is to explore whether simultaneous use of AD and cannabis in adolescence can affect AD treatment outcomes. Based on the current literature, it is reasonable to assume that antidepressants are less effective for adolescents with depression/anxiety who frequently use cannabis. The mechanisms of action of antidepressants and cannabis point to several similarities and conjunctions that merit future investigation regarding the potential effectiveness of antidepressants among adolescents who consume cannabis regularly.

Prevalence and predictors of medication non-adherence among people living with multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to describe medication non-adherence among people living with multimorbidity according to the current literature, and synthesise predictors of non-adherence in this population.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched for relevant articles published in English language between January 2009 and April 2019. Quantitative studies reporting medication non-adherence and/or predictors of non-adherence among people with two or more chronic conditions were included in the review. A meta-analysis was conducted with a subgroup of studies that used an inclusive definition of multimorbidity to recruit participants, rather than seeking people with specific conditions. Remaining studies reporting prevalence and predictors of non-adherence were narratively synthesised.

RESULTS

The database search produced 10 998 records and a further 75 were identified through other sources. Following full-text screening, 178 studies were included in the review. The range of reported non-adherence differed by measurement method, at 76.5% for self-report, 69.4% for pharmacy data, and 44.1% for electronic monitoring. A meta-analysis was conducted with eight studies (n=8949) that used an inclusive definition of multimorbidity to recruit participants. The pooled prevalence of non-adherence was 42.6% (95% CI: 34.0 - 51.3%, k=8, I²=97%, p<0.01). The overall range of non-adherence was 7.0%-83.5%. Frequently reported correlates of non-adherence included previous non-adherence and treatment-related beliefs.

CONCLUSIONS

The review identified a heterogeneous literature in terms of conditions studied, and definitions and measures of non-adherence used. Results suggest that future attempts to improve adherence among people with multimorbidity should determine for which conditions individuals require most support. The variable levels of medication non-adherence highlight the need for more attention to be paid by healthcare providers to the impact of multimorbidity on chronic disease self-management.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019133849.

Psychiatric Comorbidities Affect the Hospitalization Course of Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Cross-Sectional Inpatient Study

Objectives

We aim to delineate the differences in demographic characteristics and hospitalization outcomes including the severity of illness, hospitalization length of stay (LOS) and cost, utilization of deep brain stimulation (DBS), and disposition in Parkinson’s disease (PD) inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities versus without psychiatric comorbidities.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), included 56,844 PD inpatients (age ≥40 years), and subdivided them by inpatients into those without psychiatric comorbidities (N = 38,629) and with psychiatric comorbidities (N = 18,471). We compared the distributions of demographic characteristics and hospitalization outcomes (severity of illness, utilization ofDBS, and disposition) by performing Pearson’s chi-square test, and we measured the differences in continuous variables (i.e., age, LOS, and cost) by using the independent samples t-test. 

Results

A significantly higher proportion of PD inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities were female (44.4%) and white (83%) and had a moderate loss of functioning (48.8%) compared to those without psychiatric comorbidities. PD inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities had an increased mean LOS (4.7 days vs. 3.7 days, P <0.001) but a lower mean cost ($37,445 vs. $ 41,957, P <0.001). Also, there was a significantly lower utilization of DBS in PD inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities (19.2% vs. 26.9%, P <0.001) compared to those without psychiatric comorbidities, and an adverse disposition of transfer to a skilled nursing facility/intermediate care facility (47.1% vs. 39.6%, P <0.001) compared to PD inpatients without psychiatric comorbidities.

Conclusion

Although PD patients with psychiatric comorbidities had a moderate loss of functioning, there was significant underutilization of DBS. Meanwhile, psychiatric comorbidities among PD patients led to increased LOS and transfer to skilled facilities.

Association between Adherence to SSRI Treatment and Mortality among Individuals with Metabolic Syndrome Components

INTRODUCTION

Depression and anxiety have been associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome, major causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The effect of antidepressants in this association is unknown. This study aimed to examine the association between adherence to selective serotonin receptor inhibitors (SSRIs) and all-cause mortality among individuals with metabolic syndrome components (hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus).

METHODS

Data on 201 777 patients who were prescribed SSRIs during the years 2008-2011 were analyzed retrospectively. Adherence was measured using prescription purchase records. The moderating effect of SSRI and statin adherence on the association between metabolic syndrome load and mortality hazard risk (HR) during the study period were analyzed. The Cox-proportional hazard model adjusted to background variables was used to this end.

RESULTS

During the study period, the maximal metabolic load was associated with mortality HR=1.89 (95% CI: 1.79-2) compared to participants without metabolic risk factors. A slight reduction in mortality HR was demonstrated among those with low and moderate SSRI adherence rates. Adherence to statins was negatively associated with the risk of mortality across all levels of adherence. A significant association (r=0.214, p<0.01) was found between adherence to statins and adherence to SSRIs, with higher rates of adherence to statins across all metabolic load categories.

DISCUSSION

While a high metabolic load is associated with a higher risk of mortality, adherence to SSRIs only partially moderated the risk of mortality, in contrast to the protective effect of statins. Adherence differences to statins and SSRIs among individuals prescribed both medications merit further investigation.

Focus on Depression in Parkinson's Disease: A Delphi Consensus of Experts in Psychiatry, Neurology, and Geriatrics

Major and minor forms of depression are significant contributors to Parkinson's disease morbidity and caregiver burden, affecting up to 50% of these patients. Nonetheless, symptoms of depression are still underrecognized and undertreated in this context due to scarcity of evidence and, consequently, consistent clinical guideline recommendations. Here, we carried out a prospective, multicentre, 2-round modified Delphi survey with 49 questions about the aetiopathological mechanisms of depression in Parkinson's disease (10), clinical features and connections with motor and nonmotor symptoms (10), diagnostic criteria (5), and therapeutic options (24). Items were assessed by a panel of 37 experts (neurologists, psychiatrists, and a geriatrist), and consensus was achieved in 81.6% of them. Depressive symptoms, enhanced by multiple patient circumstances, were considered Parkinson's disease risk factors but not clinical indicators of motor symptom and disease progression. These patients should be systematically screened for depression while ruling out both anhedonia and apathy symptoms as they are not necessarily linked to it. Clinical scales (mainly the Geriatric Depression Scale GDS-15) can help establishing the diagnosis of depression, the symptoms of which will require treatment regardless of severity. Efficacious and well-tolerated pharmacological options for Parkinson's comorbid depression were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (especially sertraline), dual-action serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, and duloxetine), multimodal (vortioxetine, bupropion, mirtazapine, and tianeptine), and anti-Parkinsonian dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine). Tricyclic antidepressants and combining type B monoamine oxidase inhibitors with serotonergic drugs have serious side effects in these patients and therefore should not be prescribed. Electroconvulsive therapy was indicated for severe and drug-refractory cases. Cognitive behavioural therapy was recommended in cases of mild depression. Results presented here are useful diagnostic and patient management guidance for other physicians and important considerations to improve future drug trial design.

Impact of Antidepressants on Cardiac Events and All-Cause Mortality in Parkinson's Disease: A National Data-Linkage Study

PURPOSE

This study investigated the 1-year risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), all cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality among newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease (PD) patients who used antidepressants compared to those who did not.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with PD aged 40 years or older were identified using data from 2000 through 2016 held within the Welsh Secure Anonymized Information Linkage (SAIL) databank. Antidepressant users were propensity-score matched 1:1 with non-users, adjusting for patients' demographics, socioeconomic status, and multiple comorbidities. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the antidepressants and the study outcomes. The follow-up period was 1 year after the initial prescription of antidepressants.

RESULTS

The study group comprised a total of 3364 participants, with numbers split equally between the antidepressant-user and non-user groups, based on the propensity score-matching process. Overall, the propensity score-adjusted model showed that antidepressant usage in PD patients was not significantly associated with the risk of IHD (HR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.63-1.75) or all cardiovascular events (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.71-1.45) compared to non-users. The propensity score-adjusted model also showed that the use of any antidepressant, regardless of its category, was not statistically significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.65-1.02). However, this association reached statistical significance in the multivariate adjusted model (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.54-0.84).

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence that antidepressant use was associated with an increased risk of IHD or all cardiovascular events in newly diagnosed PD patients who suffered from depression. Furthermore, antidepressant use might reduce the mortality rate in PD patients during the first year after initiation.

CAUSES, mortality rates and risk factors of death in community-dwelling Europeans aged 50 years and over: Results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe 2013-2015

OBJECTIVE

To determine mortality rates and to rank the causes and predictors of mortality using a wide range of sociodemographic and clinical variables.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It is a prospective population-based cohort study of adults living in the community, 2013-15 N = 48,691, age ≥50; deceased = 1,944. Clinical and sociodemographic data were obtained from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe SHARE: Age, Gender, Marital Status, Years of Schooling, Income, Loneliness, Cognition, Self-Rated Health, Diseases, Activities of daily living ADL, and Frailty. Mortality rates were calculated. A Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine risk-adjusted mortality ratios.

RESULTS

The crude mortality rate was 18.39 (1000 person-years at risk), (99 % CI, 18.37-18.42). The factors most associated with an increased mortality risk were older age, lower self-rated health, lower cognition, male gender, ADL deficits, higher comorbidity, frailty and loneliness. The diseases with a higher mortality risk were: cancer (Hazard ratio, HR = 2.67), dementia (HR = 2.19), depressive symptoms (HR = 2.10), fractures (hip, femur) (HR = 1.57), stroke (HR = 1.55), chronic lung disease (HR = 1.52), diabetes (HR = 1.36) and heart attack (HR = 1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The main mortality risk factors, associated independently in the eight diseases were: older age, poor self-rated health, ADL deficits, male gender, lower cognition, comorbidity and the presence of depressive symptoms, with a different influence in the European regions. The need to evaluate and treat the depressive symptoms that accompanies diseases with higher risk of mortality is stressed.

Adherence to antidepressant medications is associated with reduced premature mortality in patients with cancer: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are common in cancer and antidepressants (AD) are efficacious treatment. The relationship between AD adherence and mortality in cancer is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between adherence to AD and all-cause mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a 4-year historical prospective cohort study including 42,075 patients with cancer who purchased AD at least once during the study period. Adherence to AD was modeled as nonadherence (<20%), poor (20-50%), moderate (50-80%), and good (>80%) adherence. We conducted multivariable survival analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical variables that may affect mortality.

RESULTS

During 1,051,489 person-years at risk follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for mortality were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.95), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.72), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.85) for the poor, moderate, and good adherence groups, respectively, compared to the nonadherent group. Analysis of the entire sample and a subgroup with depression, for cancer subtypes, revealed similar patterns for breast, colon, lung, and prostate cancers, but not for melanoma patients. Multivariate predictors of premature mortality included male gender (HR 1.48 [95% CI: 1.42-1.55]), current/past smoking status (HR 1.1, [95% CI: 1.04-1.15]; P < .0001), low socioeconomic status (HR 1.1, [95% CI: 1.03-1.17]; P < .0001) and more physical comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first to demonstrate that higher adherence to AD is associated with a decrease of all-cause mortality in a large nationwide cohort of cancer patients. Our data add to the pressing need to encourage adherence to AD among cancer patients.

Adherence to Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Taking Three and More Daily Doses of Medication

Background: Once-daily treatment formulation is associated with better adherence in comparison to more complex medication regimens. The study aimed to detect the extent of adherence to pharmacotherapy in Parkinson disease (PD) patients who take a minimum of three daily doses of drugs, and to identify factors associated with lower levels of adherence.

Methods: The cohort was selected from non-demented PD patients. The 8-Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Non-Motor Symptom Assessment Scale (NMSS), 9-Item Wearing-off Questionnaire (WOQ-9), MDS-UPDRS III (motor examination), and IV (motor complications) scales were used in this study.

Results: From a total of 124 subjects, 33.9% reported a high level of adherence, 29.8% reported a medium level of adherence, and 36.3% reported a low level of adherence to their pharmacotherapy. The level of non-adherence correlated with gender, longer disease duration, higher scores of PDQ-8, NMSS, WOQ-9, and MDS-UPDRS IV. Detailed analysis of NMSS demonstrated a correlation between the level of adherence and domains sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, and urinary symptoms. Independent risk factors for non-adherence were excessive daytime sleepiness, anhedonia, and forgetfulness.

Conclusion: Non-adherence to more complicated medication regimens is frequent in PD patients and is associated with gender, longer PD duration, poorer quality of life, frequency and severity of non-motor symptoms, and more severe motor and non-motor fluctuations. Non-adherence was predicted by non-motor symptoms including fatigue, mood disturbances, and subjective cognitive complaints.

Pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatments of depression in Parkinson's disease

Depression is the most common non-motor manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD), which significantly affects the rate of disease progression and increases the risk of motor complications and dementia. The paper considers the etiology and pathogenesis, cause-and-effect factors of depression in PD, and features of its diagnosis and treatment. Attention is paid to the algorithm for a physician's actions in the detection of depressive disorder in a patient with PD, to the choice of an antidepressant, and to the promising areas of therapy.

All-cause mortality with current and past use of antidepressants or benzodiazepines after major osteoporotic and hip fracture

In the first year, after an osteoporotic fracture of a hip, forearm, upper arm, or spine, the dispensing rates of antidepressants and benzodiazepines increased significantly. After those fractures, recent and past use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines was associated with increased all-cause mortality; current use was not associated with mortality risk.

INTRODUCTION

It remains unclear to what extent use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines is associated with mortality risk after a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). We aimed to study the cumulative use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines during the year after MOF or hip fracture (HF) and whether the use was associated with mortality.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed within the Dutch PHARMO Database Network including all patients aged 65+ with a first record of MOF (hip, humerus, forearm, and clinical vertebral fracture) between 2002 and 2011. Data were analyzed using Cox regression models, adjusted for comorbidities, and concomitant medication use and broken down to index fracture type.

RESULTS

A total of 4854 patients sustained a first MOF, of whom 1766 patients sustained a HF. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years, divided in 30-day periods. The cumulative antidepressant and benzodiazepine use during the first year after MOF increased from 10.6 to 14.7% and from 24.0 to 31.4%, respectively. Recent (31-92 days before each follow-up period) and past use (> 92 days before) of antidepressants and benzodiazepines after MOF or HF was associated with an increased all-cause mortality risk but current use (< 30 days before) was not.

CONCLUSION

There is a considerable increase in dispensing rate of antidepressants and benzodiazepines in the first year after a MOF. Recent and past use of these medications was associated with all-cause mortality. The finding that current use was not associated with mortality should be further explored and may probably be explained by the healthy survivor's bias.

Pharmacist-led medication non-adherence intervention: reducing the economic burden placed on the Australian health care system

Background: Scarcity of prospective medication non-adherence cost measurements for the Australian population with no directly measured estimates makes determining the burden medication non-adherence places on the Australian health care system difficult. This study aims to indirectly estimate the national cost of medication non-adherence in Australia comparing the cost prior to and following a community pharmacy-led intervention. Methods: Retrospective observational study. A de-identified database of dispensing data from 20,335 patients (n=11,257 on rosuvastatin, n=6,797 on irbesartan and n=2,281 on desvenlafaxine) was analyzed and average adherence rate determined through calculation of PDC. Included patients received a pharmacist-led medication adherence intervention and had twelve months dispensing records; six months before and six months after the intervention. The national cost estimate of medication non-adherence in hypertension, dyslipidemia and depression pre- and post-intervention was determined through utilization of disease prevalence and comorbidity, non-adherence rates and per patient disease-specific adherence-related costs. Results: The total national cost of medication non-adherence across three prevalent conditions, hypertension, dyslipidemia and depression was $10.4 billion equating to $517 per adult. Following enrollment in the pharmacist-led intervention medication non-adherence costs per adult decreased $95 saving the Australian health care system and patients $1.9 billion annually. Conclusion: In the absence of a directly measured national cost of medication non-adherence, this estimate demonstrates that pharmacists are ideally placed to improve patient adherence and reduce financial burden placed on the health care system due to non-adherence. Funding of medication adherence programs should be considered by policy and decision makers to ease the current burden and improve patient health outcomes moving forward.