Orexin receptor type-1 antagonist SB-334867 decreases morphine-induced antinociceptive effect in formalin test

Antinociceptive in vivo activity and chemical profiling by UHPLC-MS/MS of stem bark and leaves extracts of Ficus maxima Mill. (Moraceae)

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Ficus maxima is a medicinal plant extensively used in traditional medicine by Indigenous peoples across Central and South America. It is a member of the family Moraceae, subgenus Pharmacosycea, employed in treating various conditions, including intestinal parasites, gingivitis, internal inflammations, and snake bites. Despite its significant pharmacological potential, the species remains underrepresented in scientific literature.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to evaluate the in vivo antinociceptive properties of leaf (ELFM) and stem bark (EBFM) extracts from Ficus maxima. Additionally, the chemical composition of these extracts was determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material was collected in Abaetetuba, Pará, Brazil, in October 2013 and subjected to static maceration to obtain crude ELFM and EBFM. Bio-guided fractionation was performed by sequential liquid-liquid partitioning with hexane (Hex), dichloromethane (DCM), and ethyl acetate (EtOAc), yielding the following fractions: ELFM-Hex and EBFM-Hex, ELFM-DCM and EBFM-DCM, and ELFM-EtOAc and EBFM-EtOAc. The biological activity of EBFM, ELFM, and their respective fractions were evaluated using the formalin-induced pain test and the hot plate test, followed by an assessment of their mechanisms of action. The UHPLC-MS/MS analysis was conducted using electrospray ionization (ESI) in both positive and negative modes. Metabolite annotation was facilitated by MS/MS libraries and molecular networks constructed on the GNPS platform.

RESULTS

The reactivity time to formalin in the neurogenic phase was reduced from 84.7 ± 7.6 s (100%) to 37.3 ± 4.7 s (44%), 33.1 ± 6.3 s (39%), 40.7 ± 7.4 s (48%), 57.2 ± 2.6 s (77%), 49.7 ± 4.1 s (58%), 46.8 ± 8.1 s (55%), and 52.4 ± 5.3 s (61%) after treatment with ASA, morphine, EBFM, ELFM, ELFM-Hex, ELFM-DCM, and ELFM-EtOAc at doses of 30 mg/kg, respectively. In the inflammatory phase, the reactivity time to formalin was reduced from 124.3 ± 25.9 s (100%) to 49.7 ± 4.7 s (40%), 9.8 ± 4.3 s (8%), 32.5 ± 8.5 s (26%), 59.8 ± 16.8 s (48%), and 54.4 ± 7.3 s (44%) after treatment with ASA, morphine, EBFM, ELFM, and ELFM-Hex at doses of 30 mg/kg, respectively. A reversal of the antinociceptive action of EBFM and ELFM was observed in the inflammatory phase after treatment with atropine, a muscarinic antagonist, and naloxone, an opioid antagonist, respectively. In the hot plate test, EBFM showed Antinociceptive Activity (AA) of 62.6 ± 9.2% after 90 min; however, there was a reversal of AA to 8.6 ± 2.8% when naloxone was used. The UHPLC-MS/MS metabolite analysis revealed the presence of loliolide (3), luteolin (13), lupeol (14), gallic acid (15), chlorogenic acid (16), pygenic acid A (17), and other metabolites from the alkaloids and fatty acids classes.

Blockade of orexin receptor type-1 by SB-334867 and activation of orexin receptor type-2 attenuate morphine tolerance in rats

Purpose

The interaction of orexinergic neurons with the opioidergic system and their effects on morphine analgesia and tolerance have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of the orexin-1 and orexin-2 receptor (OX1R and OX2R) agonist and antagonist on morphine analgesia and tolerance in rats.

Material and methods

A total of 90 Wistar albino male rats weighing 180–220 g were used in the experiments. To induce morphine tolerance, rats were injected with a single dose of morphine (50 mg kg−1, s.c.) for 3 days. Morphine tolerance was assessed on day 4 in randomly selected rats by analgesia tests. In order to evaluate morphine tolerance situation, orexin-A, SB-334867, orexin-B and TCS OX2 29 were administered together with morphine for 3 days. The analgesic effects of orexin-A (10 μg kg−1), OXR1 antagonist SB-334867 (10 mg kg−1), OXR2 agonist orexin-B (15 μg kg−1), OXR2 antagonist TCS OX2 29 (0.5 mg kg−1) and morphine (5 mg kg−1) were measured at 15 or 30-min intervals by tail-flick and hot-plate antinociceptive tests.

Results

The results suggested that the combination of orexin-1 receptor antagonist SB-334867 and orexin-B with morphine significantly increased the analgesic effect compared to morphine-tolerant rats. In addition, administration of orexin-A and -B alone showed significant analgesic effects compared to the saline group. However, co-administration of orexin-A and -B with morphine did not increase the analgesic efficacy of morphine.

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrated that co-administration of SB-334867 and orexin-B with morphine attenuated morphine tolerance. Further studies are needed to elucidate the details of the interaction between orexin receptors and the opioidergic system.

GPR171 activation regulates morphine tolerance but not withdrawal in a test-dependent manner in mice

A newly deorphanized G protein-coupled receptor, GPR171, is found to be highly expressed within the periaqueductal gray, a pain-modulating region in the brain. Our recent research has shown that a GPR171 agonist increases morphine antinociception in male mice and opioid signaling in vitro . The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of combination treatment in females as well as whether chronic treatment can be used without exacerbating morphine-induced tolerance and withdrawal in female and male mice. Our results demonstrate that activation of GPR171 with an agonist attenuates morphine tolerance in both female and male mice on the tail-flick test, but not the hotplate test. Importantly, the GPR171 agonist in combination with morphine does not exacerbate morphine-induced tolerance and withdrawal during long-term morphine treatment. Taken together, these data suggest that the GPR171 agonist may be combined with morphine to maintain antinociception while reducing the dose of morphine and therefore reducing side effects and abuse liability. The outcome of this study is clearly an important step toward understanding the functional interactions between opioid receptors and GPR171 and developing safer therapeutics for long-term pain management.

Role of orexinergic receptors within the ventral tegmental area in the development of morphine sensitization induced by forced swim stress in the rat

The ventral tegmental area (VTA) has been suggested as part of a common system for reward, stress, and morphine sensitization. Repeated exposure to stress enhances sensitivity to drugs such as morphine. The role of orexin receptor type 1 (OX1R) and type 2 (OX2R) within the VTA in cross-sensitization of morphine with stress was assessed in this study. Various doses of OX1R antagonist (SB334867) and OX2R antagonist (TCS OX2 29) were microinjected into the VTA of 134 adult male albino Wistar rats through cannulae, which had been bilaterally implanted above this region. Five min after microinjection, animals were forced to swim for 6 min, and 10 min after forced swim stress (FSS) termination, a low dose of morphine (i.e., ineffective dose for sensitization) was subcutaneously injected (1 mg/kg; sc). This procedure was repeated for three consecutive days as a sensitization period followed by a 5-day drug/stress-free period. On the 9th day, sensitivity to morphine was examined by measuring antinociceptive responses to the ineffective dose of morphine via tail-flick test. The obtained findings revealed that while concurrent administration of FSS and an ineffective dose of morphine (1 mg/kg; sc) for three consecutive days induced sensitivity to morphine, intra-VTA administration of OX1R- and OX2R antagonists, dose-dependently blocked this sensitization. These results suggested that both orexin receptors located in the VTA have a considerable role in morphine sensitization induced by concurrent administration of FSS and a low dose of morphine. So, there is a contribution of the orexin system partly to stress-induced sensitization to morphine.

Research progress on the mechanism of orexin in pain regulation in different brain regions

Orexin is a neuropeptide that is primarily synthesized and secreted by the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and includes two substances derived from the same precursor (orexin A [OXA] and orexin B [OXB]). Studies have shown that orexin is not only involved in the regulation of eating, the sleep–wake cycle, and energy metabolism, but also closely associated with various physiological functions, such as cardiovascular control, reproduction, stress, reward, addiction, and the modulation of pain transmission. At present, studies that have been performed both domestically and abroad have confirmed that orexin and its receptors are closely associated with pain regulation. In this article, the research progress on acute pain regulation involving orexin is reviewed.

Persistent effects of the orexin-1 receptor antagonist SB-334867 on naloxone precipitated morphine withdrawal symptoms and nociceptive behaviors in morphine dependent rats

AIM OF THE STUDY

In this study, we investigated the effect of long-term administration of orexin receptor 1 (OXR1) antagonist on naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal symptoms and nociceptive behaviors in morphine-dependent rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wistar rats received subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine (6, 16, 26, 36, 46, 56, and 66 mg/kg, 2 ml/kg) at an interval of 24 h for 7 days. In chronic groups, the OXR1 antagonist, SB-334867 (20 mg/kg, i.p.), or its vehicle, was injected repetitively from postnatal day 1 (PND1)-PND23 and then for the following seven days before each morphine injection. Meanwhile, in acute groups, SB-334867, or its vehicle, was administered before each morphine injection. In groups of rats that were designated for withdrawal experiments, naloxone (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered after the last injection of morphine. In the formalin-induced pain, the effect of OXR1 inhibition on the antinociceptive effects of morphine was measured by injecting formalin after the final morphine injection.

RESULTS

Animals that received long-term SB-334867 administration before morphine injection demonstrated a significant reduction in chewing, defecation, diarrhea, grooming, teeth chattering, wet-dog shake, and writhing. Inhibiting OXR1 for a long time increased formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors in interphase and phase II of the formalin-induced pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that the inhibition of OXR1 significantly reduces the development of morphine dependence and behavioral signs elicited by the administration of naloxone in morphine-dependent rats. Furthermore, the prolonged blockade of OXR1 might be involved in formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors.

Opioid-Induced Signaling and Antinociception Are Modulated by the Recently Deorphanized Receptor, GPR171

ProSAAS is one of the most widely expressed proteins throughout the brain and was recently found to be upregulated in chronic fibromyalgia patients. BigLEN is a neuropeptide that is derived from ProSAAS and was recently discovered to be the endogenous ligand for the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR171. Although BigLEN-GPR171 has been found to play a role in feeding and anxiety behaviors, it has not yet been explored in pain and opioid modulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this novel neuropeptide-receptor system in opioid-induced antinociception. We found that GPR171 is expressed in GABAergic neurons within the periaqueductal gray, which is a key brain area involved in pain modulation and opioid functions. We also found that, although the GPR171 agonist and antagonist do not have nociceptive effects on their own, they oppositely regulate morphine-induced antinociception with the agonist enhancing and antagonist reducing antinociception. Lastly, we showed that the GPR171 antagonist or receptor knockdown decreases signaling by the mu-opioid receptor, but not the delta-opioid receptor. Taken together, these results suggest that antagonism of the GPR171 receptor reduces mu opioid receptor signaling and morphine-induced antinociception, whereas the GPR171 agonist enhances morphine antinociception, suggesting that GPR171 may be a novel target toward the development of pain therapeutics. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: GPR171 is a recently deorphanized receptor that is expressed within the periaqueductal gray and can regulate mu opioid receptor signaling and antinociception. This research may contribute to the development of new therapeutics to treat pain.

Analgesic tolerance induced by repeated morphine injections induces cross-tolerance to the analgesic effect of orexin-A in rats

Repeated administration of morphine or orexin-A produces tolerance to their antinociceptive effects. We investigated the possible incidence of cross-tolerance between orexin-A and morphine. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g) were used. Under deep anesthesia, a stereotaxic apparatus was used to implant a 23 G cannula into the lateral ventricle for an intracerebroventricular (ICV) microinjection. The antinociceptive effect of three different doses of orexin-A (5, 20, and 40 µM; dissolved in 5 µl sterile saline; ICV) was examined using the hot-plate test at 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after infusion. To evaluate tolerance, orexin-A (20 µM; ICV) or morphine (10 mg/kg; intraperitoneal) was administered for 7 consecutive days (twice per day) and the analgesic response was assessed at days 1, 4, and 7. Cross-tolerance was investigated at day 8 with a single injection of morphine (10 mg/kg; intraperitoneal) to the repeated orexin-A group and a single microinjection of orexin-A (20 µM; ICV) to the repeated morphine group. Analgesic responses were then examined. Administration of both orexin-A and morphine produced significant antinociception at day 1 (P<0.001 compared with the saline group). However, a significant reduction in the analgesic effects of both morphine and orexin-A appeared at day 7, following repeated administration (P<0.01). Orexin-A microinjection at day 8 in the repeated morphine group did not result in significant antinociception (P>0.05), whereas morphine injection in the repeated orexin-A group at day 8 showed a significant analgesic effect (P<0.001). These results indicate cross-tolerance to the analgesic effect of orexin-A following morphine tolerance.

Simultaneous targeting of MOR/DOR: A useful strategy for inflammatory pain modulation

Development of new analgesics endowed with mu/delta opioid receptor (MOR/DOR) activity represents a promising alternative to MOR selective compounds because of their better therapeutic and tolerability profile. Lately, we have synthetized the MOR/DOR agonist LP2 that showed a long lasting antinociceptive activity in the tail flick test, an acute pain model. Here, we investigate whether LP2 is also effective in the mouse formalin test, a model of inflammatory pain sustained by mechanisms of central sensitization. Moreover, we evaluated a possible peripheral component of LP2 analgesic activity. Different doses of LP2 were tested after either intraperitoneal (i.p.) or intraplantar (i.pl.) administration. LP2 (0.75-1.00 mg/kg, i.p.), dose-dependently, counteracted both phases of the formalin test after i.p. administration. The analgesic activity of LP2 (0.75-1.00 mg/kg) was completely blocked by a pretreatment with the opioid antagonist naloxone (3 mg/kg, i.p.). Differently, the pretreatment with naloxone methiodide (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a peripherally restricted opioid antagonist, completely blocked the lower analgesic dose of LP2 (0.75 mg/kg) but only partially relieved the antinociceptive effects of LP2 at the dose of 1.00 mg/kg, thus revealing a peripheral analgesic component of LP2. I.pl. injections of LP2 (10-20 μg/10 μl) were also performed to investigate a possible effect of LP2 on peripheral nerve terminals. Nociceptive sensitization, which occur both at peripheral and central level, is a fundamental step for pain chronicization, thus LP2 is a promising drug for pain conditions characterized by nociceptive sensitization.

Yokukansan (Kampo medicinal formula) prevents the development of morphine tolerance by inhibiting the secretion of orexin A

Background

Yokukansan (YKS), a traditional herbal (Kampo) medicine consisting of seven herbs, is effective in the treatment of pain disorders, such as headache, postherpetic neuralgia, fibromyalgia, and trigeminal neuralgia, and we have previously shown it to be effective against morphine analgesic tolerance in rats. It has been reported that orexin receptor antagonists prevent the development of morphine tolerance and that YKS inhibits the secretion of orexin A in the hypothalamus. This study examined whether the inhibition of the secretion of orexin A by YKS is one mechanism underlying its effect against morphine analgesic tolerance.

Methods

Male Wistar rats were administered a subcutaneous injection of morphine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg/day) for 5 days. One group was preadministered YKS, starting 3 days before the morphine. The withdrawal latency following thermal stimulation was measured daily using a hot plate test. On day 5, the levels of orexin A in the plasma and the midbrain were measured, and the appearance of activated astrocytes in the midbrain was examined by immunofluorescence staining.

Results

The preadministration of YKS prevented the development of morphine tolerance. The repeated administration of morphine significantly increased the plasma and midbrain levels of orexin A and the activation of astrocytes. These increases were significantly inhibited by the preadministration of YKS.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the preadministration of YKS attenuated the development of antinociceptive morphine tolerance and that the inhibition of orexin A secretion may be one mechanism underlying this phenomenon.

Characterization of Nociceptive Behaviors Induced by Formalin in the Glabrous and Hairy Skin of Rats

Introduction:

Glabrous skin and hairy skin are innervated by different types of noxious fibers. However, the different nociceptive behaviors induced by formalin, a commonly used model of acute inflammatory pain, have not yet been systematically examined in the glabrous and hairy skin.

Methods:

In this study, we compared nociceptive behaviors induced by formalin injections (2%, 4%, and 8%) into either glabrous skin (plantar surface) of the hind paw or hairy skin of the hind limb in adult rats.

Results:

A typical biphasic nociceptive response was seen after formalin injection into the plantar surface of the hind paw. A brief interphase separates the first and second phases where nociceptive behaviors were barely spotted. However, following subcutaneous injection into the hairy skin nociceptive behaviors were only seen after 10 minutes of formalin injection, which correlates in time with the second phase of the formalin response. First phase nociceptive behaviors were never seen with hairy skin injection, even following multiple injections of formalin.

Conclusion:

These data suggest that nociceptive behaviors and spinal responses induced by formalin injections to glabrous and hairy skin areas are different, and that the first and second phases may be mediated through different noxious afferent fibers.

Modulation of nociception by medial pre-optic area orexin a receptors and its relation with morphine in male rats

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have shown that medial pre-optic area (MPOA) of hypothalamus are involved in nociception. Orexin A (hypocretin 1) has been found to have numerous applications including pain modulation. However, the role of orexin A receptors in the MPOA on the nociception has not been yet studied. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of orexin A microinjection on MPOA on the nociception transmission and morphine induced analgesia in adult male rats.

METHODS

Using stereotaxic surgery, a cannula was implanted at a site 1mm above the MPOA in the anesthetized rats. After the recovery period, tail-flick (TF) latency was measured as 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60min following the onset of two experimental protocols. Two experiments were carried out. Experiment 1: The male rats received intra-MPOA of 25, 100, 1000, 10000pmol/0.5μl orexin A or 0.5μl of aCSF (control, just 5min before the TF assay. Experiment 2: The aim of this experiment was to examine the effect of orexin microinjection into MPOA on morphine analgesia (3mg/kg,s.c). Morphine was administered 30min before orexin A intra-MPOA microinjection (four doses similar to experiment 1) or aCSF, then TF latency was measured.

RESULTS

The results indicated that microinjection of orexin A into the MPOA showed anti-nociceptive effect in a time-dependent manner. Dose response curve results also revealed that the maximum effective dose of orexin A injection into MPOA for pain inhibition is 1000pmol/0.5μl. Co-administration of systemic morphine and orexin into the MPOA has additive analgesia with different time course compared morphine or orexin alone.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that MPOA OrexinA receptors play an important role in the modulation of pain in normal and morphine treated male rats.

Orexin-A and Endocannabinoid Activation of the Descending Antinociceptive Pathway Underlies Altered Pain Perception in Leptin Signaling Deficiency

Pain perception can become altered in individuals with eating disorders and obesity for reasons that have not been fully elucidated. We show that leptin deficiency in ob/ob mice, or leptin insensitivity in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in mice with high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity, are accompanied by elevated orexin-A (OX-A) levels and orexin receptor-1 (OX1-R)-dependent elevation of the levels of the endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG). In ob/ob mice, these alterations result in the following: (i) increased excitability of OX1-R-expressing vlPAG output neurons and subsequent increased OFF and decreased ON cell activity in the rostral ventromedial medulla, as assessed by patch clamp and in vivo electrophysiology; and (ii) analgesia, in both healthy and neuropathic mice. In HFD mice, instead, analgesia is only unmasked following leptin receptor antagonism. We propose that OX-A/endocannabinoid cross talk in the descending antinociceptive pathway might partly underlie increased pain thresholds in conditions associated with impaired leptin signaling.

Orexin A activates hypoglossal motoneurons and enhances genioglossus muscle activity in rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Orexins have been demonstrated to play important roles in many physiological processes. However, it is not known how orexin A affects the activity of the hypoglossal motoneuron (HMN) and genioglossus (GG) muscle.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

GG muscle electromyograms (GG-EMG) were recorded in anaesthetized adult rats after orexin A or orexin receptor antagonists were applied to the hypoglossal nucleus, and in adult rats in which orexin neurons were lesioned with the neurotoxin orexin-saporin (orexin-SAP). HMN membrane potential and firing were recorded from neonatal rat brain slices using whole-cell patch clamp after an infusion of orexin A or orexin receptor antagonists.

KEY RESULTS

Unilateral micro-injection of orexin A (50, 100 or 200 μM) into the hypoglossal nucleus significantly enhanced ipsilateral GG activity in adult rats. Orexin A (4, 20, 100 or 500 nM) depolarized the resting membrane potential and increased the firing rate of HMNs in a dose-dependent manner in the medullary slices of neonatal rats. Both SB 334867, a specific OX1 receptor antagonist and TCS OX2 29, a specific OX2 receptor antagonist not only blocked the depolarized membrane potential and the increased firing rate of HMNs by orexin A in the neonatal model but also attenuated GG-EMG in the adult model. A significant decrease in GG-EMG was observed in adult orexin neuron-lesioned rats compared with sham animals.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Orexin A activates OX1 and OX2 receptors within the hypoglossal motor pool and promotes GG activity, indicating that orexin A is involved in controlling respiratory motor activity.

Changes in hippocampal orexin 1 receptor expression involved in tooth pain-induced learning and memory impairment in rats

Orexin 1 receptor signaling plays a significant role in pain as well as learning and memory processes. This study was conducted to assess the changes in orexin 1 receptor expression levels in hippocampus following learning and memory impairment induced by tooth inflammatory pulpal pain. Adult male Wistar rats received intradental injection of 100 µg capsaicin to induce pulpal pain. After recording the pain scores, spatial learning and memory were assessed using Morris Water Maze test. The hippocampal levels of orexin 1 receptor mRNA and protein were determined by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunoblotting respectively. The data showed that capsaicin-induced tooth inflammatory pulpal pain was correlated with learning and memory impairment. Intra-hippocampal injection of orexin A inhibited pain-induced learning and memory impairment. However, orexin 1 receptor antagonist, SB-334867, had no effect on learning and memory impairment. Moreover, capsaicin-induced pain significantly decreased hippocampal orexin 1 receptor mRNA and protein levels. Meanwhile, reversed changes took place in the ibuprofen-pretreated group (p < 0.05). It seems that decrease in orexin 1 receptor density and signaling could be involved in tooth pain-induced learning and memory impairment.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2013

This paper is the thirty-sixth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2013 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia; stress and social status; tolerance and dependence; learning and memory; eating and drinking; alcohol and drugs of abuse; sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology; mental illness and mood; seizures and neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity and neurophysiology; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunological responses.